Added: 5 years ago
From: Illtype
Views: 5,514
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lol this is comical. Fetzer is so dramatic with his delivery. He should win a fucktard award for being the biggest fucktard on the planet.

    That's all. 911 was an outside job!!! 911 was an outside job!!!

  • common non belivers the main reason were led to belive terroist did it because there god has told them to yet before they kill themselves they say the wrong line then there supposed to say when they kill themselves were they nervous and decided to say something else like what the hell

  • PkofPk... Either you are a government spook or you are a very very dumb person.

  • Come on guys, the US government relies on the stupidity of the masses. If you know science, you cannot believe in the government's account. It's not that complicated.

  • "Operation Northwoods" and "Bay of pigs" are operations that the CIA ran, trying to cause false flag terrorism. "But now, they would never do 9/11!" Wake the fuck up sheeple. We've got Nazis in the white house-seriously.

  • One of which never happened, the other which took place nearly 40 years ago and didn't involved attacks on civilians in the US. Color me convinced!

  • these guys are right...

  • PkoPk is on the gov't payroll.

  • PkofPk you are so dumb... you don't know physics so you can't understand the evidece so stfu...

  • those debunking websites miss many of the major points

  • Keep posting those shitty debunking sites,lol

  • http://911conspiracysmasher.bl­ogspot.com/2006/06/james-fetze­r-lunatic-at-large.html

  • pkwhatever, Fetzer is not an idiot. All you are doing is trying to post myth sites that just call mostly everything that happened that day a coincidence.

  • http://911conspiracysmasher.bl­ogspot.com/2006/05/alex-jones-­911-conspiracy-kook.html  http://911conspiracysmasher.bl­ogspot.com/2006/06/alex-jones-­wrong-so-far.html

  • Debunking 9/11 Myths.com

    http://911physics.atspace.com/­Pages/Debunking911Myths/WTC7.h­tm

  • 9/11 was an inside job. 911myths.com is filled with lies and distortions, for real 9/11 coverage, go to 911blogger.com

  • http://chronicle.com/temp/repr­int.php?id=j2dll9sp4mf4rtkp62d­hg6yxsm3jt43c

  • http://karim.co.nr/

  • INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

    INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

  • INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

    INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

  • 9/11myths.com is a CIA front group created to slopw down the progress of the 9/11 truth movement. go to 911blogger.com and prisonplanet.com for some REAL 9/11 coverage.

  • aranoia strikes deep..." --Buffalo Springfield http://911myths.com/html/site_­faq.html

  • Man,

    I look up these web sites you guys post. Absolute falacy, fairyland. Yes, it's a fearful thing to accept the truth that your own government (or a vicious, oath bound, secret element" within it would murder 3,000 of it's own citizens. Yes, that is more than most can accept and grasp at anything that will help refute such a nightmare. It's not Osama nor Saddam that are using the trajedy to legislate away the Bill of Rights and bring on the Police State.

  • I've replied to 911myths.com and it's lies. Why don't you address that? What is your motive? Do you truly seek truth? What did you think of the Benson stuff? Secretary of Agricluture speaking of treason so severe that he was viciously attacked by traitors in Washington. What do you think of that historical fact, and it continues today:

    http://www.awakeandarise.org/m­edia/EzraTaftBenson-selection7­min.mp3

  • http://911myths.com/WTCTHERM.p­df 

    http://911myths.com/Sulfur.pdf

  • http://911myths.com/WTCREPORT.­pdf

    http://911myths.com/Energy_Tra­nsfer_Addendum.pdf

  • Finally, after an hour, Youtube begins to post my comments again. I began to think after 20 times I was being censored. To follow up now with this, here is more commentary Here is a refutation of Dr. Firmages foolish and shallow objection to Dr. Jones http://www.911truthseekers.org­/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?t­opic_id=17&forum=3

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns.

  • hey pkofpkunt. do have anything to say? how does it feel to be in the total grip of fear?

  • Junping in here and speaking only for myself, how does it feel to look a right idiot by posting the exact same juvenile rant at least 3 times? Wooooo...I tell ya...I'd sure be a-shaking in MY boots after such as that. (sarcasm intended)

  • I did post it over 20 times, and wrote youtube complaining at their censoring me, as the posts didn't go up for over an hour. It appeared I was being censored, then the multiple posts came on-line all at once.

    What is your motive in all this? To defend either Skull and Bones Kerry or Skull and Bones Bush as they usher in the North American Union, the merging of the US, Canada and Mexico?

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • hey pkofpkunt. you don't seem to have anything to say. how does it feel to be in the total grip of fear?

  • hey pkopk. you don't seem to have anything to say... how does it feel to be in the total grip of fear?

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns.

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns.

  • Okay Buddy,

    That whole thing you just posted is blown out of the water. Dr. Jones has had his paper peer reviewed 2 TIMES now. Peer review does not mean it must be published in a certain publication. Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote before knowing jack squat. He claims a "hollow tube" idea of the WTC. Here is a rebuttal to his foolishly shallow critique of Dr. Jones: http://www.911truthseekers.org­/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?t­opic_id=17&forum=3

  • Hmmm..I think I'll follow PkofPk's idea of responding like you do:

    "911truthseekers is nothing but lies! Squak sqauk! Polly wanta cracker! Squak!"  Yeah, he's right. Much easier than going to the trouble of posting FACTS. Kinda makes one feel dirty though, stooping into the gutter to reply to guttersnipes on their own level. Oh well!

    911myths.com

  • Oh golly and hot dog. C-SPAN might air some of this "symposium". Mainstream media at last, hallelujah! If it's a news-lite day they might wedge it in between the report of FooFoo the elephant giving birth and the latest NASCAR pile up. Cuz everybody needs a good laugh now and then, eh?

  • Now this is amusing...at the beginning of this clip Fetzer is finishing up a discourse wherein he displays his vast knowledge of fluent Arabic, Muslim custom, and Islamic theology. Wow. Not. Can a strawman actually grasp at straws? It appears so.

  • Dr. Jones has been peer reviewed 2 TIMES by PhD's, that is peer review. And now some lame "well, it wasn't published in xyz journal complaint is foolish. Take the evidence to task. Molten metal comeing out of the building? Explain that! Dr. Firmage foolishly wrote a critique of Dr. Jones before knowing the facts in deapth, he subscribes to the "hollow tube" theory of the tower, ignoring like the government the massive interior steel columns.

  • http://911myths.com/html/wtc_m­olten_steel.html

    http://www.geocities.com/debun­king911/moltensteel.htm  I also notice CTs as a rule will ignore any rebutal and then just keep sqwauking the same fantasy allegations ad infinitum.

  • Let's also have a look at all these "phonies" Edmond talks about: http://www.geocities.com/debun­king911/paper.htm

  • Know that God's wrath will soon overtake those who have combined to murder and who are now planning the next attack hoping then to destroy the US Constitution. God has made eternal decrees that when his cup of wrath is full, he will reign down justice upon the heads of these traitors, and PkofPk, you will in that day know horror and terror, seeing you have upheld and devoted yourself to a lie, and fought truth.

  • You have no clue or idea who and what and where I have fought you arrogant mollycoddled jerk. You take your freedoms for granted.

    Gee, I think I am finally geting ahold of this CT brand of debate. Boy, what fun! Do you guys stick out your tongues too while you type and scream "nyaah nyahh"?

  • For sec.. US coverment took your freedom.. :P

  • Brilliant, this will be a powerful piece airing on C-SPAN.

    PkofPk is on the loosing side, refusing to address the issues the scholars have brought forth. Why do you refuse to address the issues buddy? You roam around and post your phoney web sites and attack and name call these great men speaking truth, true Patriots. You love a lie, and seek to uphold and believe a lie.

  • LMAO. Juvenile naysaying, unfounded dismissals of webites - many of which contain articles by EXPERTS (MIT, firemen investigators, civil engineers, physicists, etc.), and then the above ends with libel and petty name calling. Here, let me stoop to your level: you ignorant snotnosed little anti-American, terrorist loving, petulant, assine twerp. Howz that? Am I getting the gist of you CTs' tactics yet?

  • LOL It's on cspan

  • you are terrorist... YOU ARE THE ONE THAT KILLS INNOCENT PEAPLE IN IRAQ

  • yep, but americans dont see it that way :(

  • Oh look, It's crackpot Fetzer....no wait, it's Elvis, no wait, it's Bigfoot, no wait, it's the grassy knoll shooter, no wait.....

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more