In your video you point to where South-Sudan is located as the origin of homo sapien. Is that factual, or are you just pointing to the Afican continent (more or less in the middle)? I am investigating climatological and nutritional circumstances of human origins, could you tell something about that?
@boomtao it's not actually my video (see description) but I think I can answer that for you. The geography shows only roughly where the concentration of Chromosome markers leads in terms of modern day populations, in this case, to the San people. The San however are spread over quite a wide geographical region of Central-East Africa. On nutrition - check out "shell middens". That'll take you back about 140,000 years.
@ay280 Yes the comments are working, but I have to wonder why you think you might be blocked before posting anything? Then of course your next comment shows exactly why. Look if you think this holy-numbers bullshit is valid then go do a video on it or something - you can even post it as a response here, as long as YOU actually contribute something, but don't spam all over my channel with links to bullshit sites. I won't put up with it.
@dangar45 oh you mean ACTUAL racist shit. I thought you were referring to the video. So who's been saying this stuff about blond haired Nord Europeans then?
@MrBritdog2 Eskimos live on a diet that's ridiculously high in vit D so they don't need the sunlight they would otherwise in order to produce serum vit D. This is well documented - not crap.
well crossing the straight from Russia is being proven that its not likely into America there is a few that did but only 6 Clovis sights in the west and Chesapeake bay alone in the east coast has 200 sights, so they came from Europe when the ocean was lower,......
There are couple of things in this video, I find hard to agree with. You state that populations, that stay put have more genetic markers. Yet, if the new markers appear among the groups, which left, as in your example, then the population, which stayed, doesn't have these markers, correct?
Also, how can living people be our ancestors? Does this mean their genetics have remained unchanged for 60,000 years?
@TheCrazyFinn Of the total starting population in Africa, a minority migrated, so a smaller sample of the genetic variation of that population went on to populate the rest of the world. This was a genetic bottleneck - a gene pool with less diversity which has only now been diversifying for 100,000 years or so, unlike the original population which had much longer and whose descendants still live in Africa today.
you havent explained anything here. You make a number of huge gaping leaps throughout. You're just another guy with crazy theories. You say you have explained human origin right back to the big bang! Joker
@robolicrawhe potholer54 who made the video, has explained the scientific evidence for us all being descended from an ancestral population in Africa. That's every human alive today, unless an as yet undiscovered population has DNA that suggests otherwise. The fact that you think this video even attempts to explain the origin of humans right back to the big bang tells me you haven't watched the video. I suggest you do so. Until such time, take a guess who the joker actually is ;o)
@unfukkkmee That was the late Oligocene period, apes as we know them had just appeared. It was a time of giants, nothing even close to man was around then.
@unfukkkmee Islamo-fascist? well that's a first. you realise that's a bit of self-contradictory term. oh and I love how you just assumed I'm Muslim - despite the fact that I was defending this video, which has an anti-religious mood to it. I don't need to tell you to go fuck yourself, because you're already doing it by making stupid comments.
@unfukkkmee I can see why you've got a bandage on your head now. It's either as a result of the lobotomy or someone gave you a well deserved kicking. I've invited you to say what you've got to say - and what you've got is nothing but some vague attempt at a cultural/ancestral slur. Is that it? Is that really all you've got? Why are you here?
@unfukkkmee you're the one swearing and hurling insults. It's my channel, my vid, my comments. If you don't want to talk with the grown-ups then piss off. I'm sure you and your Greek nationalist pals must have some real life mud-bloods to pick on. Go get yourself another kicking.
If Columbus sailed the ocean with no more than three wooden ships, easily stumbled accross land, and accidently found two continents, how much harder would it be for the Africans which science and historians now suggest.
wouldn't it make sense for the Africans to have travel accross the atlantic much sooner than the bearing strait theory arose? Modern science says humans first populated the Americas some 30,000 yrs ago. Yet we see similar pyramids and monument separated by entire oceans.
as for the mixing with neanders (in m.east / europe)...not only we know, now, that 4% of the genome of homo sapiens OUT of africa are from it..but, now, science only begin to try to figure out what are those 4%...very first results seem to indicate that inside those 4%, were extremely immunities genes against local diseases..giving so an hybrid much stronger & better suited to the new environment (so the world conquest later)..i guess will be the same with denisovan (asia) etc..^ fascinating :)
well.. video : 2008. 2011 : extremely interesting new discoveries leading to new paradigms...the 'Out of africa' (OA) theory is more&more disputed by now..with more&more new discordants discoveries..out of africa (precisely) ). The very new 'multiregionalism' theory begins to have serious points, even if by now, we can only creditate a 'middle of the road' scenario; sapiens out of africa, but uniquely mixing out with local unique (old erectus) species..neander, flores, denisovans, etc^)
All that this is saying is suspect and too simplistic. I personaly don't believe it. there must have been other creatures or prehistoric Humans that were not negroid or african. In either case.. if the africans exited Africa, 60.0000 years ago, then they evolved differently than the negroids that stayed behind in africa, they evolved more because of the exposure to other different problems, of weather and other creatures and dangers. All the great Cultures of the world were never sub saharan.
are primate origins maybe from african continent but not the human race
if all human share a gene marker then why is the linier route drawn to africa !
im pretty sure early sapien were globle before they evolved to modern homosapien human
example why do i have gene's that are only found northern parts of the world like ! R1B,J/J2 ,Q,I2b ect ? ... because my evolution is not african thats why ...
@okuma0kuma you have to think of it like a family tree. Every one on that tree has the genetic markers present in the original ancestor (mitochondrial Eve). Later generations, geographically separated, will still carry the original markers, plus some new ones that have appeared that the source population doesn't have - and so on. The markers we ALL have are found in the indigenous population in East Africa, but not the subsequent ones, showing they are the source population of us all.
@dj2baduk so, the fact that you have markers the San don't have, is proof of this out of Africa theory rather than a refutation of it. Because of the dispersal of new markers and the mutational "clock", we can get a pretty good picture of which markers appeared where and when, which also provides a pretty good picture of the migrational routes our ancestors took. Does that make sense?
@dj2baduk oh i see ,so all that information says the habitat is perfectly suited to them so there need to evolve has become stunted ,pesonally i think more gene types pop up the better it is for the future of the human race
quick search through web oldest sapien remains were about 160,000 and were discovered in "Afar Triangle" border of arabian and african tectoinc plates ,one thing is clear the diversity that makes humans diffrent is not from african or arabian origin ,non supremisist lol
@okuma0kuma I'm not sue I follow you. Look - to simplify, let's say your great grandmother from italy passed on a marker. She and her son stayed in Italy, but her daughter, your grandmother, moved to Ireland, where she gave birth to a son and a daughter who both inherited a new marker, the son stayed in Ireland but the daughter, your mother, moved to Spain where she had you and passed on a new marker. You carry all the markers, those in Ireland less, those in Italy fewest of all. Supremacist?
@dj2baduk i shorten the comment a little ,i just meant to say context wasnt meant to sound supremacists and could have been easly taken out of context
but yes like you suggest those markers what define us as diffrent ! species of human did not evolve from african habitat
like the diffrence in felis , canis or equus ect race's neither living species are ancestor of the other because they evolved to there surrounding habitat ! meta
example meta complication mule species can only remain as hybrid
homosapien did not come from africa ,perhaps you should watch documentary like type "The Incredible Human Journey" in your youtube's search bar and stop being linear you dumb cunt nugget
@okuma0kuma all the evidence so far is against what you've just said. Modern living homo-sapiens, based on the analysis of thousands of genomes of indigenous individuals from all over the globe, carry a trail of markers that leads to Africa in every single case. Any alternative you adhere to must be supported by evidence just as strong AND explain this pattern of inheritance. Good luck with that.
@dj2baduk all evidence is against me saying homosapiens(human race of primate) remains(bones) are found on every continent on the planet !? ... really please do prove that wrong,every geologist who doesn't believe in noahs ark will confirm that and like i typed earlier .... R1B,J/J2 ,Q,I2b and several more human genes are not from african continent
youtube search term for you "bbc origin of us" for a refreshing update to insight of how we evolved to modern human of today
@okuma0kuma except that's not what you actually said is it? Your comment "homosapien did not come from Africa" was a response to FourthStreetFair, who said "your are African...". In terms of the common ancestor of all living homo-sapiens, based on all the evidence, that is true. There may be exceptions, but no evidence has been found of any so far. You'd expect to have genes not from Africa. It has been tens of thousands of years after all.
@dj2baduk / @FourthStreetFair before there were homo sapien there were homo ergaster (over 2 million years old) which is found in african ,india ,vietnam and china which ergaster is direct ancestor of homo heidelbergensis, homo neanderthalensis, and homo sapiens
800,000+ year old jaw bone was found in northern spain by José Bermúdez de Castro and Eudald Carbonell ... Dmanisi (russia) 1.7 million year old homo ergaster is oldest known outside africa ,"every one from africa" theory is wrong
@okuma0kuma extention to my reply to fourthstreet comment
homosapien did not come from africa because homo sapien was global ,there is no linear path of origin each of human race evolved to the habitats they made home ,
allot of what we are is based on are diet calcium for example in oriental regions milk is not a common source of intake in were the soft animal bone is substitute for calcium intake making practically every east asian on the the earth's surface lactose intolerant
@okuma0kuma there has been more than one migration of the homo genus from Africa, that's well documented and no-one is contesting it here. Modern humans are not descended from any of those ancestors, but from the ones who migrated from Africa during the most recent migration, so in a very real sense FourthStreetFair was correct - you are African by descent, as are all living homo-sapiens.
@okuma0kuma sorry but that was just gobbledygook. The question you should be asking is why you refer to yourself in the 3rd person and why you think the BBC's "Origin of us" series in any way refutes the out of Africa theory, when it clearly does no such thing. The simple conclusion is that you just don't understand what you're talking about or what the documentary you're referring to was talking about.
@dj2baduk lol the question instruction was specific (ask your self meaning the reader)
you know you have no knowledge in the origin of life ,to say we come from africa is an assumption ,if the origin of primates was a linear line from africa like you suggest how do you explain biretia fossils ?
you known if you separate race they will eventually evolve to a separate species but work in reverse as well
DOGS for example if german shephard and siberian husky mate what origin would the puppys be from ? lets cop out and call it an eurasian husky maybe !ok then lets extend that again what if those puppys then grew to mate with a dingo where is the origin of those puppys ?
irony to tree of life
branches may lead to a trunk but then the roots are more than twice as dense and just as fare spread out
true analysis is are origin is not as linear as creationists believe
@dj2baduk bbc origin of us explains how parts of are body evolved ,and i think one episodes does explain australopithecine being ancestor of homo genus ,by which time sapiens were global before they existed
heck just search homo in wiki you will get a lovely chart saying homo sapien is world wide
@okuma0kuma yes - homo sapiens lived worldwide - AFTER the migration from Africa as the map in the wiki article YOU directed me to clearly shows. You might want to note the subtitle under that map "Map of the migration of modern humans out of Africa, based on mitochondrial DNA" and it also shows... migration of homo-sapiens from Africa. I think you're picking things up wrong.
@dj2baduk i wish i were picking things up wrong then i would have learned something new but it is clear human(homo sapien) is not from africa as you just admitted us being worldwide which is why we have so much diversity in appearance,it wasn't the sapien but the heidelbergensis which migrated but primate origins show migrations pre-dating out of africa theory such as teilhardina magnoliana primate fossil which was dated about 55 million years old and found in north america not africa oops
if you are claiming that ! "black people" are the ancestor of the human race then you are racist
i repeat australopithecine are the descendant of homo genus(humans are homo genus) ,type human evolution in wiki australopithecine is in the second paragraph at the top of the page after you done that look up homo heidelbergensis to see investigation to it being direct ancestory branching sapien & neanderthal
That's exactly what i'm claiming & nice try attempting to flip "racist" around, but quite frankly idgaf about u calling me tht bc i'm stating facts w/ scientific proof. wikipedia is not a credible source by itself. My college professors won't even let me document them. A piece that actually has merit is a documentary called "Journey of Man" They break their research which includes hundreds of thousand DIFF DNA samples tht are all traced back to the same clan in Africa. its on u-tube
well mister racist my advice is to click the SEE ALL then see im not using online wiki as my source of information all my information is based scientists like dr alice roberts wiki youtube and personal observation in 3d cgi research ,i use multiple sources for all my information based on known science
i challenge you
question for your college professor which part of africa did the homo genus genes R1B,J/J2 ,Q,I2b come from , it will be interesting have that explained ? hehe
@okuma0kuma haplogroup (not gene) R1B is believed to have originated in Eurasia 18,500 ya - AFTER the migration. J/J2 Mesopotamia around the same time. Q central Asia 15-20,000 ya. Need I go on?
Look you either don't understand this or you're a clown. Either way - you've wasted enough time. You'd do better applying yourself elsewhere.
i wasnt clowning around sorry about that mishap haha ,but thanks for backing me up on that though dj lets hope that Divines college professor will say same thing
@okuma0kuma I'm not an expert, but, from what i understood, this video talks about our species, of which we are all descendent. Those species you talk about may (our may not) have influenced the world population (i heard that neanderthalensis did), but the evidence presented in this video shows that we are all descendants of the modern humans that migrated from Africa 50k years ago. If this is true, then we are all Africans.
@raviept video does do a good job of occam's razor but when you connect the dots to draw a tree you find that the tree trunk/s are hazier than you believe as the roots spread out wider than the branches plus parts of the vast puzzle are still undiscovered yet..
homosapien - sapiens is the technical name for human species which is a global race if you want to find out more about them geologists , anatomists and genealogist are the researchers who will give you the most accurate answers
@okuma0kuma the fields you mention do provide a good picture of human history, but if you want to nail down a genetic family tree of living humans, DNA is the best you can do. It's as simple as this; if we analysed every single human on the planet, we may find some anomalies e.g. some people who do not possess the DNA markers that the rest of us share. Until such time, based on the huge numbers of genomes analysed all showing an African ancestral trail, Out of Africa is the best explanation.
Wait a second if, as I understand it anyway, the earliest human woman lived 100,000 years ago and the earliest human man 60,000 years ago how did the species continue for the 40,000 inbetween? If I misunderstood please correct me but if I understood right please explain cause I'm confused.
@ProtestantIRA Mitochondrial Eve is the last female ancestor all modern humans have in common. She's the great, great, great.... grandmother of us all, not the earliest human woman. If she had sisters who had children, none of their line survives today. Likewise the man referred to is our last common male human ancestor, not the earliest human male. If he had brothers who fathered children, none of their line survives today.
@ProtestantIRA if you take yourself and any other person and trace their family tree back far enough, you'll find you share a female ancestor. However, she may have mated with more than one male. So you're common male ancestor may not be of the same generation. Similarly, if you trace your ancestry back to your common male ancestor, he may have fathered children by more than one woman. The picture is blurred further by the accuracy of dating possible from male/female DNA.
@dj2baduk Ok that helps a lot more but, and correct me if I'm still wrong, wouldnt our earliest female ancestor have been mating outside of the species? If so isnt that biologically impossible? Again thats as I understand it and if I'm still wrong please correct me.
@ProtestantIRA not at all. We're talking about homo-sapiens here. The homo-sapiens species far pre-dates our last common male and female ancestors. They're simply the male and female individuals whose descendants live on today. They would have had human brothers, sisters, cousins, distant cousins, fathers, mothers, aunts, uncles, grandparents etc.
@ProtestantIRA Sorry - I've misled you slightly and had to do a refresher myself. Mitochondrial "Eve" is the earliest female ancestor we can trace an unbroken line of females back to. There were doubtless other lines whose descendant are alive today, but if they are only survived by a son and no daughters at one point in the line, then the matrilineal line is broken.
@dj2baduk So that would mean, if I now understand this correctly anyway, that there were males of the same species as "Eve" at the same time but the line has become broken as you put it until several thousand years later? Am I right with this?
@ProtestantIRA there have been anatomically modern humans, male and female, for over 200 thousand years. We're only talking about lines of descent we can trace and on the female side, this matrilineal line can be traced unbroken (females descended from females) to mitochondrial Eve. On the male side, the patrilineal line can be traced unbroken (males descended from males) to Y Chomosom Adam, who lived more recently.
@sumerates no - the video is entirely the work of potholer54. I mirrored it here to help, in some small way, get him the viewership he clearly deserves. Check out his channel which as the rest of the "Made Easy" series and also his sister channel potholer54debunks.
@MsColdCanada precisely that is why all chinese people look like chinese, why anyone can tell an african frm a white person, and y most can tell an East Indian from a mile away. Genetics includes features as well as various biological predospitions: ie 1/12 Africans are carriers for Sickle Cell, most Chinese do not have similar enzymes Caucasians do for metabolizing alcohol, no other race has Afros except Africans and only Chinese have the eyes which tell them apart. Obviously genetics is tied.
Chinese and Melanesians are the closest blood siblings. They both share the same markers and same physical characteristics. Have a look at my new video
@Pyaar111 I suggest you check your sources. Trace fossils, which Adolf Sielachar specialises in, show that life began on earth nearly 4 billion years ago. You've simply pulled a bullshit quote from a website. A 1.1 billion yo fossil found in India wouldn't prove life began in India any more than a 3.5 billion year old fossil found in Australia proves life began in Australia. None of this has anything to do with this video. You've a long way to go. Best get started.
@india000000000 I've blocked you and removed most of your comments, both under this account and the sock-puppet ones you used to post further bilge and thumb yourself up. You can't be surprised surely. Your comments are not worthy of any kind of response. You clearly have no intention of enquiring or responding honestly or reasonably and will not be swayed by argument or evidence. So - fuck off then. You've earned it and you're welcome to it.
Here's the funny thing, these maps and "so called" markers don't explain how not one Asian Indian has an afro or typical African facial structure (much different than Asian or East Indian).
I love how it just generalizes with "mutations"........but if you watch Origin of North Europeans, it proves mongoloids (Chinese) or Africans with blue eyes/blond hair (they exist) do not look like Europeans, yet East Indians do. That is where this video fails &everything is just "theories" anyway.
@Pyaar111 please explain how what anything you've just said, even if true, means that this video fails. You just spout a load of incoherent bullshit and then pull a conclusion out your ass that has nothing to do with what you've said. If you've nothing intelligent to contribute then piss off. If you've some legitimate questions then let's hear them.
b) the ones that do not interbred with East Indians (99% straight hair, smaller face, similar features)& this explains very few with straight hair in Afr
c) It has been found another race was present in Egypt, Asians
d) The Kabaa was once a Hindu temple, look it up on line, also look up Indus Valley Civilization (navigation is in origin Sanskrit meaning India travelled in 3000BC)
e)Loo up cow migrations from India to Africa in 3000 BC scientific article
@TheSunStars1 you're blocked for being a twat - again! Are you really so dumb as to think that setting up a new account who's only 2 friends are the other 2 accounts you already got blocked on for being a twat would go unnoticed!? Now fuck off! I won't put up with your bullshit. You were warned multiple times. Now you can fuck off multiple times!
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL you're the only person I've heard so far use the term negro-centrist, so the joke's on you. I VERY rarely block people but if they're behaviour is sufficiently twat-like I'll do so without compunction. It's even rarer for me to erase people's comments. More often, twats erase them themselves and then cry foul. It's classic twat behaviour. Extensive genetic studies entirely support the out of Africa theory. Where's the evidence to debunk this?
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL you mistake the mere use of words for a reasoned argument. Saying the same thing in capital letters will not do it.
There are many things genetics is not the answer to. Tracing ancestry and population migration are 2 things it categorically IS the answer to. It trumps all else. If "Out of Africa" is debunked, then you have to come up with something more compelling than genetics to back that up. You haven't because you can't. You won't do any time soon for the same reason.
1, DARWIN evolution theory is based on monkey theory. THERE is NO MISSING LINK!!
2, We are more closely related to PIGS then monkeys as DNA is closer. Which destroys the theory.
3, HUMANITY is linked back to ASIA as almost all race is traced to ASIA, which fits as it is ASIAN culture, religions, art, musical instruments, philosophy, pyramids, LANGUAGES, culture etc etc is root of all.
Go search where the word AFRICA comes from, its not ROMAN!!
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL what exactly is "monkey theory"? You're correct about one thing - there is no missing link. We are on the same ancestral tree as apes and are our closest non-human cousins are chimpanzees. You're just wrong about pigs. Categorically so. Many people can trace their ancestry to asia but the simple fact is EVERY asian's ancestry traces back to Africa, as does every other human's ancestry. I don't give a flying fuck where the word Africa comes from. It's irrelevant.
You resort to manipulation just shows how your RELIGION of DARWINISM is flawed!!
As I stated the MONKEY theory is based on many many believes, that we are linked to monkeys yet there is NO MISSING link!! Which is based on FAITH!!
We have nothing in common with monkeys, as for DNA all is linked, even banana we share 50% dna & ;pigs has is almost 98%!! I have stated FACTS about PIGS.
out of africa theory, DEBUNKED!!
WE DO NOT ORIGINATE FROM AFRICA, show me ONE EVIDENCE!!
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL my "religion" of Darwinism is right up there next to my "religion" of Newtonism and my "religion" of "Ampereism". LOL.
Manipulation? Please explain.
Yes, I agree, there is no missing link, though I can't see how you don't find that a defeater for your own argument. Nothing in common with chimps? Full body hair in the womb? Genes to grow a tail? Hands with opposable thumbs? Omnivorous teeth? 5 toes? 5 fingers? 16 Shared ERV insertions in exactly the same location? LOL
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL no one's even certain we couldn't interbreed with chimps, that's how similar we are. You're just wrong about pigs. We are more distantly related to them than we are to chimps. There's no argument.
Again, typing DEBUNKED in capital letters is not an argument. Cite me some compelling evidence.
Evidence FOR the out of Africa theory - erm - did you happen to watch the video? Perhaps you've heard of the genographic project? I'd start with their website.
I quote u "no ones certain we couldn't interbreed with chimps, thats how similar we are"YOUR WORDS, so UNCERTAIN, ZERO EVIDENCE, this alone shows how baseless the MONKEY theory is & based on FAITH FANTASY, yet you are deluded!!!
Its too funny!!
ps, MONEKY SPERM/EGGS failed to breed with humans!!
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL what's really funny is your complete inability to get the point. We are genetically similar enough to chimps that interbreeding could be possible. We are absolutely certain we cannot interbreed with pigs. Chimpanzees are not monkeys. We separated from monkeys longer ago than apes. Look, you might as well just face up to the fact that your just not very bright, which is why you keep making an ass of yourself. Either study up or keep your ignorance to yourself.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL pig organ transplants are more successful thanks to a single gene that means they aren't so readily rejected by humans. The same goes for cows. You've mistaken this to mean that the pig genome is a closer match to humans than chimps, which is categorically, scientifically, emphatically incorrect.
Pig stem cells are not used in humans - BS, though there has been research to reprogram chimp stem cells for use in humans BECAUSE they are such a close match to begin with.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL well you haven't yet remotely explained how it is you've "exposed" me. You're statements are factually incorrect as anyone, including you, can verify in a matter of minutes.
I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and say that these "many others" - who were the same person by the way, were/was a personal friend of yours, if not you yourself. I blocked him because he was spamming the comments and using sock-puppet accounts to thumb himself up. I make no apology for that.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL there's a difference between me not countering any of your points and you not realising you've been schooled. It's apparent you're just too dumb to realise that.
1. What missing link?
2. What missing link?
3. Since all life on earth is related by common ancestry, we'd expect to share a lot of DNA with other life, more so with things we're more closely related to like chimps, slightly less so with pigs, less so with carrots. You're demonstrably wrong about pigs.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL so as if we didn't have enough to go on to deduce you're an ignorant ass, you bring racism to the table as well.
I can forgive you're ranting nonsense, your deep level of ignorance on matters you yet feel compelled to comment on in the most obnoxious tone, even your attempts to slur me personally, but I won't tolerate racism. I'm actually surprised you have the internet in that cave you apparently live in. Fuck off pal. The journey is yours alone now.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL You've used the term '"black" ignorance' twice now. In native English this is a term attacking the intelligence of "black" people. So if that's not how you intended it then I retract my charge of racism. Can I ask you in that case, what is your first language?
Can I also ask you - have you looked at the genographic project website? Have you looked for scholarly articles related to human-chimp-pig DNA comparison? Do you understand what evidence is? or a theory?
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL Oh dear. It's pretty clear that I don't consider black to be a race, but people who use terms like you did, do. You've demonstrated repeatedly now that you're a dimwit, so it's entirely reasonable for me to assume you'd be dimwitted with a racial slur as well (even if that's not what you meant to say).
You're going to help me? Now that is funny ;o)
You're clearly a waste of space. That was my last olive branch. You burned it then pissed all over it. Now fuck off.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL so once again you've proven yourself to be an ignorant ass by espousing a conclusion not supported, in fact contradicted, by the facts of the matter.
You can call me a liar all you like. The only problem with that is that anyone can check the facts on this for themselves in minutes by looking them up on the internet, which is what you should have done before making an ass of yourself yet again.
Again, you're just not very bright. Best start facing up to it.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL well it's now apparent that as well as not understanding what a scientific theory is, you also don't understand what evidence is. Making a statement is not evidence - even if you put it in bold. You have to point me to some kind of scientific study that demonstrates the validity of your claims, specifically:
1. That humans are not ancestrally related to all other life on earth.
2. That modern human ancestry can't be traced to Africa.
Asian ancestry is traced back to Africa through distinctive genetic markers that are inherited. By following this trail of markers, you can tell quite clearly which populations are descended from which other populations, as the video clearly explains. If you don't agree with this, you have to show why it's wrong. Modern examples of cultural influence are irrelevant.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL 1. Monkeys are more closely related to humans than pigs. Humans and monkeys share a more recent common ancestor than humans and pigs. That's a matter of scientific fact supported by homology and DNA analysis and accepted, based on this evidence, by every biologist in the world. LOL indeed.
2. You're talking about modern Africans and modern Asians. It's irrelevant. I'm talking about markers that go back tens of thousands of years.
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL have you looked at the genographic project website? If so, you have to explain how this is "zero evidence" and not in fact the strongest body of evidence we have for human ancestry and migration.
You do know that a "theory" in science is not a guess or a mere hypothesis but a framework that explains a body of evidence, don't you?
I've explained why pig/cow heart valves are used. You've ignored that, because you're an ass.
@TheSunStars1 ,,,sorry , but I'm going a lot back further than you,,,the hindu asiatic diagreeables were created with straight hollow black hair prior to the migration of africans populating the globe(pre-paleman) at a time when the only homo-sapiens on the planet were all negroid with no such thing as an indian or east indian,,,,try 45,000, b.c.,,,its a lot more going on than you have been taught,,take a trip to the motherland and get its real history,,," teach ".
"95-99% do have afro" what race are you speaking???
As for Egyptians, of course they are ASIAN, look at all of north Africa, they are from West Asia, which is where todays Arabs. The pyramid is a very very Asian architecture.
Adolf Seilachar & P.K. Bose, scientists: "One Billion-Year-Old fossil prove life began in India: AFP Washington reports in Science Magazine that German Scientist Adolf Seilachar and Indian Scientist P.K. Bose have unearthed fossil in Churhat a town in Madhya Pradesh, India which is 1.1 billion years old and has rolled back the evolutionary clock by more than 500 million years
im curious? if we migrated out of africa 60.000yrs ago why have they recently found a 1.2million yr old carcation skull in spain? why have there also been finds of carcation skeletons of simular ages found in newzealand? very odd? man thinks hes so clever today and has answer to everything yet when confronted with somthing that dosent fit in with common acceptance its locked away and fogoten about?
@ts3830 what's a carcation? At any rate, it's a well documented fact that there's been more than one migration from Africa of the "homo" lineage. That's not in dispute, nor is it "locked away and forgotten" as you say. That's utter bullshit. However that has nothing to do with the fact that modern humans are all descended from African's who left during the last migration. There is no human skeleton from New Zealand that's anything close to 1.2 million years old. That's just pure bullshit.
surprise... should we giva shit ?
TheMidgaardSerpent 2 days ago
In your video you point to where South-Sudan is located as the origin of homo sapien. Is that factual, or are you just pointing to the Afican continent (more or less in the middle)? I am investigating climatological and nutritional circumstances of human origins, could you tell something about that?
boomtao 1 week ago
@boomtao it's not actually my video (see description) but I think I can answer that for you. The geography shows only roughly where the concentration of Chromosome markers leads in terms of modern day populations, in this case, to the San people. The San however are spread over quite a wide geographical region of Central-East Africa. On nutrition - check out "shell middens". That'll take you back about 140,000 years.
dj2baduk 1 week ago
@dj2baduk -- Thank you, I appreciate it!
boomtao 1 week ago
Comment removed
bdf50 1 week ago
Thanks for posting this Potholer54 video!
Rationalific 1 week ago
@Rationalific you're welcome!
dj2baduk 1 week ago
This video is such BULLSHIT.
Skin color is the smallest difference between the Races. There are skeletal, intellectual, muscular, sexual, developmental etc...
Aryan Man is Cro-Magnon. Negros and Asians are not.
parasitesarefunny 3 weeks ago
Great video sir! Bravo!
erikabarker7 3 weeks ago
lol croc
ROCLewisken1 1 month ago
hey boysssss how good is this <3
ROCLewisken1 1 month ago
ITS NICK HEY HEY TELL ME IF YOU SEE THIS!!!
Pattersonic1 1 month ago 3
IT LACHLAN BISHOP HEYYYYYY
zFuJiAU 1 month ago 3
This backs it up folks.
w w w dot thegreatdesign dot c o m
ay280 1 month ago
Test
ay280 1 month ago
@ay280 Yes the comments are working, but I have to wonder why you think you might be blocked before posting anything? Then of course your next comment shows exactly why. Look if you think this holy-numbers bullshit is valid then go do a video on it or something - you can even post it as a response here, as long as YOU actually contribute something, but don't spam all over my channel with links to bullshit sites. I won't put up with it.
dj2baduk 1 month ago
Why would anyone waste time on this racist shit?
dangar45 1 month ago
@dangar45 what racist shit are you referring to?
dj2baduk 1 month ago
@dj2baduk Like saying all people with blond hair is Nord European or that you need blond hair and blue eyes to be "pure" European.
dangar45 1 month ago
@dangar45 oh you mean ACTUAL racist shit. I thought you were referring to the video. So who's been saying this stuff about blond haired Nord Europeans then?
dj2baduk 1 month ago
ok Eskimos are dark as hell so the Melanin lie is crap Eskimos are Dark as Hispanic Indians for 200,000 years and still are Dark this is crap.
MrBritdog2 1 month ago
@MrBritdog2 Eskimos live on a diet that's ridiculously high in vit D so they don't need the sunlight they would otherwise in order to produce serum vit D. This is well documented - not crap.
dj2baduk 1 month ago 2
well crossing the straight from Russia is being proven that its not likely into America there is a few that did but only 6 Clovis sights in the west and Chesapeake bay alone in the east coast has 200 sights, so they came from Europe when the ocean was lower,......
MrBritdog2 1 month ago
satanic hand sign at 8.04
TheX4honda 1 month ago
There are couple of things in this video, I find hard to agree with. You state that populations, that stay put have more genetic markers. Yet, if the new markers appear among the groups, which left, as in your example, then the population, which stayed, doesn't have these markers, correct?
Also, how can living people be our ancestors? Does this mean their genetics have remained unchanged for 60,000 years?
TheCrazyFinn 1 month ago
@TheCrazyFinn Of the total starting population in Africa, a minority migrated, so a smaller sample of the genetic variation of that population went on to populate the rest of the world. This was a genetic bottleneck - a gene pool with less diversity which has only now been diversifying for 100,000 years or so, unlike the original population which had much longer and whose descendants still live in Africa today.
dj2baduk 1 month ago
you havent explained anything here. You make a number of huge gaping leaps throughout. You're just another guy with crazy theories. You say you have explained human origin right back to the big bang! Joker
robolicrawhe 2 months ago
@robolicrawhe potholer54 who made the video, has explained the scientific evidence for us all being descended from an ancestral population in Africa. That's every human alive today, unless an as yet undiscovered population has DNA that suggests otherwise. The fact that you think this video even attempts to explain the origin of humans right back to the big bang tells me you haven't watched the video. I suggest you do so. Until such time, take a guess who the joker actually is ;o)
dj2baduk 2 months ago 8
Awesome video, and great series.
GoGadgetHookerClean 2 months ago
THE MOST OLD GREEK SKELETON HAS AGE 20.000.000 YEARS AGO
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
THE MOST OLDEST SKELETON IS GREEK SKELETON WHO HAS AGE 20.000.000 YEARS AGO
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee > His telling as about how early modern humans colonized our world.
Not what happened 20,000,000 years ago....That's a different subject!
Adelaidemark 2 months ago
@Adelaidemark THE MOST OLD GREEK SKELETON HAS AGE 20.000.000 YEARS AGO
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee That was the late Oligocene period, apes as we know them had just appeared. It was a time of giants, nothing even close to man was around then.
TheBardicDruid 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee according to who/what? Stop spamming my comments with your silly underscore comments. If you've got something to say, say it.
dj2baduk 2 months ago
@dj2baduk SHUT UP GYPSY ANGLO-BARBARIAN, SLAVOMONGOLIAN WTF ARE U. THE TRUTH IS ''SILLY' FOR UR RETARD ''BRAIN''
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee go stick a finger up your back-end orifice and fuck yourself you degenerate.
TheArabassist 2 months ago
@TheArabassist SHUT UP Islamo-FASCIST
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee Islamo-fascist? well that's a first. you realise that's a bit of self-contradictory term. oh and I love how you just assumed I'm Muslim - despite the fact that I was defending this video, which has an anti-religious mood to it. I don't need to tell you to go fuck yourself, because you're already doing it by making stupid comments.
TheArabassist 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee I can see why you've got a bandage on your head now. It's either as a result of the lobotomy or someone gave you a well deserved kicking. I've invited you to say what you've got to say - and what you've got is nothing but some vague attempt at a cultural/ancestral slur. Is that it? Is that really all you've got? Why are you here?
dj2baduk 2 months ago
@dj2baduk SHUT UP SON OF WHORE, DIRTY MONGOLOID
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee your quite tightly wound aren't you.
dj2baduk 2 months ago
@dj2baduk KKOZE UR DIRTY MOUTH
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
@unfukkkmee you're the one swearing and hurling insults. It's my channel, my vid, my comments. If you don't want to talk with the grown-ups then piss off. I'm sure you and your Greek nationalist pals must have some real life mud-bloods to pick on. Go get yourself another kicking.
dj2baduk 2 months ago
yey! im a bushman.
heldenkatze 2 months ago
Hold on... SO I'M RELATED TO BLACK PEOPLE!?!?! MY FRIENDS AT THE KKK ARE GOING TO HATE ME!!!!!
Carnosaurus1337 2 months ago
Niggers are lazy,they never will emigrate to another territory and ever are in the south thus down.
chu8894 2 months ago
@chu8894 For an albino nigger you're pretty dumb!
itsanillusion100 2 months ago
Wow, we sure have come a long way from the days of being Bush People. Well, unless of course you happen to be a Bush Person...
MaximusRelaximus 3 months ago
well i see a lot of bullshit vids on youtube but this is not amoung them. decent educational video
micap20078 3 months ago 10
If Columbus sailed the ocean with no more than three wooden ships, easily stumbled accross land, and accidently found two continents, how much harder would it be for the Africans which science and historians now suggest.
Mr7digit 3 months ago
wouldn't it make sense for the Africans to have travel accross the atlantic much sooner than the bearing strait theory arose? Modern science says humans first populated the Americas some 30,000 yrs ago. Yet we see similar pyramids and monument separated by entire oceans.
Mr7digit 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love truth about one race:)
Mrbigsnead1 3 months ago
incredibly fascinating.
hornybrownguy 4 months ago
nice video on general DNA principles though ) ps; DNA is not culture, cultures are not just DNA ! *)
sunset002007 4 months ago
as for the mixing with neanders (in m.east / europe)...not only we know, now, that 4% of the genome of homo sapiens OUT of africa are from it..but, now, science only begin to try to figure out what are those 4%...very first results seem to indicate that inside those 4%, were extremely immunities genes against local diseases..giving so an hybrid much stronger & better suited to the new environment (so the world conquest later)..i guess will be the same with denisovan (asia) etc..^ fascinating :)
sunset002007 4 months ago
well.. video : 2008. 2011 : extremely interesting new discoveries leading to new paradigms...the 'Out of africa' (OA) theory is more&more disputed by now..with more&more new discordants discoveries..out of africa (precisely) ). The very new 'multiregionalism' theory begins to have serious points, even if by now, we can only creditate a 'middle of the road' scenario; sapiens out of africa, but uniquely mixing out with local unique (old erectus) species..neander, flores, denisovans, etc^)
sunset002007 4 months ago
awesome video
tusi1390 4 months ago
I always thought these bushman were closer to Europeans then the ...u know the congo black man.
Wazztheweasel 4 months ago
All that this is saying is suspect and too simplistic. I personaly don't believe it. there must have been other creatures or prehistoric Humans that were not negroid or african. In either case.. if the africans exited Africa, 60.0000 years ago, then they evolved differently than the negroids that stayed behind in africa, they evolved more because of the exposure to other different problems, of weather and other creatures and dangers. All the great Cultures of the world were never sub saharan.
moigranespiritu12 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wwwyoutubecom/watch?v=T87GgyCqB4o&feature=related
mymay84 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wwwyoutubecom/watch?v=eQJ54qnBVNg
mymay84 4 months ago
are primate origins maybe from african continent but not the human race
if all human share a gene marker then why is the linier route drawn to africa !
im pretty sure early sapien were globle before they evolved to modern homosapien human
example why do i have gene's that are only found northern parts of the world like ! R1B,J/J2 ,Q,I2b ect ? ... because my evolution is not african thats why ...
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma you have to think of it like a family tree. Every one on that tree has the genetic markers present in the original ancestor (mitochondrial Eve). Later generations, geographically separated, will still carry the original markers, plus some new ones that have appeared that the source population doesn't have - and so on. The markers we ALL have are found in the indigenous population in East Africa, but not the subsequent ones, showing they are the source population of us all.
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk so, the fact that you have markers the San don't have, is proof of this out of Africa theory rather than a refutation of it. Because of the dispersal of new markers and the mutational "clock", we can get a pretty good picture of which markers appeared where and when, which also provides a pretty good picture of the migrational routes our ancestors took. Does that make sense?
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk oh i see ,so all that information says the habitat is perfectly suited to them so there need to evolve has become stunted ,pesonally i think more gene types pop up the better it is for the future of the human race
quick search through web oldest sapien remains were about 160,000 and were discovered in "Afar Triangle" border of arabian and african tectoinc plates ,one thing is clear the diversity that makes humans diffrent is not from african or arabian origin ,non supremisist lol
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma I'm not sue I follow you. Look - to simplify, let's say your great grandmother from italy passed on a marker. She and her son stayed in Italy, but her daughter, your grandmother, moved to Ireland, where she gave birth to a son and a daughter who both inherited a new marker, the son stayed in Ireland but the daughter, your mother, moved to Spain where she had you and passed on a new marker. You carry all the markers, those in Ireland less, those in Italy fewest of all. Supremacist?
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk i shorten the comment a little ,i just meant to say context wasnt meant to sound supremacists and could have been easly taken out of context
but yes like you suggest those markers what define us as diffrent ! species of human did not evolve from african habitat
like the diffrence in felis , canis or equus ect race's neither living species are ancestor of the other because they evolved to there surrounding habitat ! meta
example meta complication mule species can only remain as hybrid
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma IDIOT! You are African face it stop hating on your true ancestry. African!
FourthStreetFair 4 months ago
@FourthStreetFair im Riever lineage bitch
homosapien did not come from africa ,perhaps you should watch documentary like type "The Incredible Human Journey" in your youtube's search bar and stop being linear you dumb cunt nugget
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma all the evidence so far is against what you've just said. Modern living homo-sapiens, based on the analysis of thousands of genomes of indigenous individuals from all over the globe, carry a trail of markers that leads to Africa in every single case. Any alternative you adhere to must be supported by evidence just as strong AND explain this pattern of inheritance. Good luck with that.
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk all evidence is against me saying homosapiens(human race of primate) remains(bones) are found on every continent on the planet !? ... really please do prove that wrong,every geologist who doesn't believe in noahs ark will confirm that and like i typed earlier .... R1B,J/J2 ,Q,I2b and several more human genes are not from african continent
youtube search term for you "bbc origin of us" for a refreshing update to insight of how we evolved to modern human of today
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma except that's not what you actually said is it? Your comment "homosapien did not come from Africa" was a response to FourthStreetFair, who said "your are African...". In terms of the common ancestor of all living homo-sapiens, based on all the evidence, that is true. There may be exceptions, but no evidence has been found of any so far. You'd expect to have genes not from Africa. It has been tens of thousands of years after all.
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk / @FourthStreetFair before there were homo sapien there were homo ergaster (over 2 million years old) which is found in african ,india ,vietnam and china which ergaster is direct ancestor of homo heidelbergensis, homo neanderthalensis, and homo sapiens
800,000+ year old jaw bone was found in northern spain by José Bermúdez de Castro and Eudald Carbonell ... Dmanisi (russia) 1.7 million year old homo ergaster is oldest known outside africa ,"every one from africa" theory is wrong
okuma0kuma 4 months ago 4
@okuma0kuma extention to my reply to fourthstreet comment
homosapien did not come from africa because homo sapien was global ,there is no linear path of origin each of human race evolved to the habitats they made home ,
allot of what we are is based on are diet calcium for example in oriental regions milk is not a common source of intake in were the soft animal bone is substitute for calcium intake making practically every east asian on the the earth's surface lactose intolerant
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma there has been more than one migration of the homo genus from Africa, that's well documented and no-one is contesting it here. Modern humans are not descended from any of those ancestors, but from the ones who migrated from Africa during the most recent migration, so in a very real sense FourthStreetFair was correct - you are African by descent, as are all living homo-sapiens.
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk its your belief to agree with @FourthStreetFair :)
question you should ask your self is why is okuma the only one mentioning information on real physical evidence sofare ?
it is confirmed out of africa theory is a debunked theory ,it is nothing more than play of ideals used in racial and religious politics ,
second question at which point do we draw a line and say its origin
example im making theory are origin is 3.14159~(Pi) found with in every particle of every atom in are body 0_0
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma sorry but that was just gobbledygook. The question you should be asking is why you refer to yourself in the 3rd person and why you think the BBC's "Origin of us" series in any way refutes the out of Africa theory, when it clearly does no such thing. The simple conclusion is that you just don't understand what you're talking about or what the documentary you're referring to was talking about.
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk lol the question instruction was specific (ask your self meaning the reader)
you know you have no knowledge in the origin of life ,to say we come from africa is an assumption ,if the origin of primates was a linear line from africa like you suggest how do you explain biretia fossils ?
you known if you separate race they will eventually evolve to a separate species but work in reverse as well
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
explaining reverse part of comment
DOGS for example if german shephard and siberian husky mate what origin would the puppys be from ? lets cop out and call it an eurasian husky maybe !ok then lets extend that again what if those puppys then grew to mate with a dingo where is the origin of those puppys ?
irony to tree of life
branches may lead to a trunk but then the roots are more than twice as dense and just as fare spread out
true analysis is are origin is not as linear as creationists believe
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@dj2baduk bbc origin of us explains how parts of are body evolved ,and i think one episodes does explain australopithecine being ancestor of homo genus ,by which time sapiens were global before they existed
heck just search homo in wiki you will get a lovely chart saying homo sapien is world wide
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma yes - homo sapiens lived worldwide - AFTER the migration from Africa as the map in the wiki article YOU directed me to clearly shows. You might want to note the subtitle under that map "Map of the migration of modern humans out of Africa, based on mitochondrial DNA" and it also shows... migration of homo-sapiens from Africa. I think you're picking things up wrong.
dj2baduk 4 months ago
@dj2baduk i wish i were picking things up wrong then i would have learned something new but it is clear human(homo sapien) is not from africa as you just admitted us being worldwide which is why we have so much diversity in appearance,it wasn't the sapien but the heidelbergensis which migrated but primate origins show migrations pre-dating out of africa theory such as teilhardina magnoliana primate fossil which was dated about 55 million years old and found in north america not africa oops
okuma0kuma 4 months ago
@okuma0kuma
-______-
u just have an issue with the idea of being descendants from black people. lmao get over it.
DivinelyMochaDipped 3 months ago
@DivinelyMochaDipped
O____O shocking
if you are claiming that ! "black people" are the ancestor of the human race then you are racist
i repeat australopithecine are the descendant of homo genus(humans are homo genus) ,type human evolution in wiki australopithecine is in the second paragraph at the top of the page after you done that look up homo heidelbergensis to see investigation to it being direct ancestory branching sapien & neanderthal
okuma0kuma 3 months ago
@okuma0kuma
That's exactly what i'm claiming & nice try attempting to flip "racist" around, but quite frankly idgaf about u calling me tht bc i'm stating facts w/ scientific proof. wikipedia is not a credible source by itself. My college professors won't even let me document them. A piece that actually has merit is a documentary called "Journey of Man" They break their research which includes hundreds of thousand DIFF DNA samples tht are all traced back to the same clan in Africa. its on u-tube
DivinelyMochaDipped 3 months ago
well mister racist my advice is to click the SEE ALL then see im not using online wiki as my source of information all my information is based scientists like dr alice roberts wiki youtube and personal observation in 3d cgi research ,i use multiple sources for all my information based on known science
i challenge you
question for your college professor which part of africa did the homo genus genes R1B,J/J2 ,Q,I2b come from , it will be interesting have that explained ? hehe
okuma0kuma 3 months ago
@okuma0kuma haplogroup (not gene) R1B is believed to have originated in Eurasia 18,500 ya - AFTER the migration. J/J2 Mesopotamia around the same time. Q central Asia 15-20,000 ya. Need I go on?
Look you either don't understand this or you're a clown. Either way - you've wasted enough time. You'd do better applying yourself elsewhere.
dj2baduk 3 months ago
@dj2baduk sorry the comment was reply i just had to remove the @DivinelyMochaDipped because of character limit
i wasnt clowning around sorry about that mishap haha ,but thanks for backing me up on that though dj lets hope that Divines college professor will say same thing
okuma0kuma 3 months ago
@okuma0kuma I'm not an expert, but, from what i understood, this video talks about our species, of which we are all descendent. Those species you talk about may (our may not) have influenced the world population (i heard that neanderthalensis did), but the evidence presented in this video shows that we are all descendants of the modern humans that migrated from Africa 50k years ago. If this is true, then we are all Africans.
raviept 2 months ago
@raviept video does do a good job of occam's razor but when you connect the dots to draw a tree you find that the tree trunk/s are hazier than you believe as the roots spread out wider than the branches plus parts of the vast puzzle are still undiscovered yet..
homosapien - sapiens is the technical name for human species which is a global race if you want to find out more about them geologists , anatomists and genealogist are the researchers who will give you the most accurate answers
okuma0kuma 2 months ago
@okuma0kuma the fields you mention do provide a good picture of human history, but if you want to nail down a genetic family tree of living humans, DNA is the best you can do. It's as simple as this; if we analysed every single human on the planet, we may find some anomalies e.g. some people who do not possess the DNA markers that the rest of us share. Until such time, based on the huge numbers of genomes analysed all showing an African ancestral trail, Out of Africa is the best explanation.
dj2baduk 2 months ago
@dj2baduk haha multiple global anomalies FTW
okuma0kuma 2 months ago
So we are all Africans?
JoshAlfred27 5 months ago
Wait a second if, as I understand it anyway, the earliest human woman lived 100,000 years ago and the earliest human man 60,000 years ago how did the species continue for the 40,000 inbetween? If I misunderstood please correct me but if I understood right please explain cause I'm confused.
ProtestantIRA 5 months ago
@ProtestantIRA Mitochondrial Eve is the last female ancestor all modern humans have in common. She's the great, great, great.... grandmother of us all, not the earliest human woman. If she had sisters who had children, none of their line survives today. Likewise the man referred to is our last common male human ancestor, not the earliest human male. If he had brothers who fathered children, none of their line survives today.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk Ok, that helps me understand a little better but I still dont quite get it.
ProtestantIRA 5 months ago
@ProtestantIRA if you take yourself and any other person and trace their family tree back far enough, you'll find you share a female ancestor. However, she may have mated with more than one male. So you're common male ancestor may not be of the same generation. Similarly, if you trace your ancestry back to your common male ancestor, he may have fathered children by more than one woman. The picture is blurred further by the accuracy of dating possible from male/female DNA.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk Ok that helps a lot more but, and correct me if I'm still wrong, wouldnt our earliest female ancestor have been mating outside of the species? If so isnt that biologically impossible? Again thats as I understand it and if I'm still wrong please correct me.
ProtestantIRA 5 months ago
@ProtestantIRA not at all. We're talking about homo-sapiens here. The homo-sapiens species far pre-dates our last common male and female ancestors. They're simply the male and female individuals whose descendants live on today. They would have had human brothers, sisters, cousins, distant cousins, fathers, mothers, aunts, uncles, grandparents etc.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@ProtestantIRA Sorry - I've misled you slightly and had to do a refresher myself. Mitochondrial "Eve" is the earliest female ancestor we can trace an unbroken line of females back to. There were doubtless other lines whose descendant are alive today, but if they are only survived by a son and no daughters at one point in the line, then the matrilineal line is broken.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk So that would mean, if I now understand this correctly anyway, that there were males of the same species as "Eve" at the same time but the line has become broken as you put it until several thousand years later? Am I right with this?
ProtestantIRA 5 months ago
@ProtestantIRA there have been anatomically modern humans, male and female, for over 200 thousand years. We're only talking about lines of descent we can trace and on the female side, this matrilineal line can be traced unbroken (females descended from females) to mitochondrial Eve. On the male side, the patrilineal line can be traced unbroken (males descended from males) to Y Chomosom Adam, who lived more recently.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk ok that clears it all up now. Thank you for helping me out with that.
ProtestantIRA 4 months ago
wow this is great i didnt know people were so sophisticated even before farming
sumerates 6 months ago
@sumerates no - the video is entirely the work of potholer54. I mirrored it here to help, in some small way, get him the viewership he clearly deserves. Check out his channel which as the rest of the "Made Easy" series and also his sister channel potholer54debunks.
dj2baduk 6 months ago
@MsColdCanada precisely that is why all chinese people look like chinese, why anyone can tell an african frm a white person, and y most can tell an East Indian from a mile away. Genetics includes features as well as various biological predospitions: ie 1/12 Africans are carriers for Sickle Cell, most Chinese do not have similar enzymes Caucasians do for metabolizing alcohol, no other race has Afros except Africans and only Chinese have the eyes which tell them apart. Obviously genetics is tied.
TheSunStars1 6 months ago
Chinese and Melanesians are the closest blood siblings. They both share the same markers and same physical characteristics. Have a look at my new video
MelanesianChinese 6 months ago
@Pyaar111 I suggest you check your sources. Trace fossils, which Adolf Sielachar specialises in, show that life began on earth nearly 4 billion years ago. You've simply pulled a bullshit quote from a website. A 1.1 billion yo fossil found in India wouldn't prove life began in India any more than a 3.5 billion year old fossil found in Australia proves life began in Australia. None of this has anything to do with this video. You've a long way to go. Best get started.
dj2baduk 6 months ago
Comment removed
india000000000 6 months ago
@india000000000 I've blocked you and removed most of your comments, both under this account and the sock-puppet ones you used to post further bilge and thumb yourself up. You can't be surprised surely. Your comments are not worthy of any kind of response. You clearly have no intention of enquiring or responding honestly or reasonably and will not be swayed by argument or evidence. So - fuck off then. You've earned it and you're welcome to it.
dj2baduk 6 months ago
@india000000000 ,,,,funny cause in china,,,dog is a cuisine
getaura1 6 months ago
Here's the funny thing, these maps and "so called" markers don't explain how not one Asian Indian has an afro or typical African facial structure (much different than Asian or East Indian).
I love how it just generalizes with "mutations"........but if you watch Origin of North Europeans, it proves mongoloids (Chinese) or Africans with blue eyes/blond hair (they exist) do not look like Europeans, yet East Indians do. That is where this video fails &everything is just "theories" anyway.
Pyaar111 6 months ago
@Pyaar111 please explain how what anything you've just said, even if true, means that this video fails. You just spout a load of incoherent bullshit and then pull a conclusion out your ass that has nothing to do with what you've said. If you've nothing intelligent to contribute then piss off. If you've some legitimate questions then let's hear them.
dj2baduk 6 months ago
Comment removed
Pyaar111 6 months ago
@dj2baduk greetings are you the narrator of this vid?
joey143anna 6 months ago
@Pyaar111 You seem to have appearance confused with genetics. Only a small part of the human genome has anything to do with how we look.
MsColdCanada 6 months ago
@Pyaar111 ,,,,some ancient africans had strait black hair,,,naturally,,,not all africans have the same type hair , eye , and skin colors,,,simply
getaura1 6 months ago
@getaura1
a) 95-99 %% do have afro
b) the ones that do not interbred with East Indians (99% straight hair, smaller face, similar features)& this explains very few with straight hair in Afr
c) It has been found another race was present in Egypt, Asians
d) The Kabaa was once a Hindu temple, look it up on line, also look up Indus Valley Civilization (navigation is in origin Sanskrit meaning India travelled in 3000BC)
e)Loo up cow migrations from India to Africa in 3000 BC scientific article
TheSunStars1 6 months ago
@TheSunStars1 you're blocked for being a twat - again! Are you really so dumb as to think that setting up a new account who's only 2 friends are the other 2 accounts you already got blocked on for being a twat would go unnoticed!? Now fuck off! I won't put up with your bullshit. You were warned multiple times. Now you can fuck off multiple times!
dj2baduk 6 months ago
@dj2baduk
NEGRO CENTRISTS lol are a joke!!
Please tell the world where does the word Africa comes from??
Why block & eraze peoples comment that bring substance??
Out of Africa has been debunked loooong time ago1!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL you're the only person I've heard so far use the term negro-centrist, so the joke's on you. I VERY rarely block people but if they're behaviour is sufficiently twat-like I'll do so without compunction. It's even rarer for me to erase people's comments. More often, twats erase them themselves and then cry foul. It's classic twat behaviour. Extensive genetic studies entirely support the out of Africa theory. Where's the evidence to debunk this?
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
Your comments is laughable!! Just shows how u r scared of the truth.
GENETICS is not the answer to all!! In fact Genetics have shown. How it is UNLIKELY we came out of monekeys!
Out of AFRICA has been debunked a LOOOOOONG time ago!! in front HONEST INTELLECTUAL RIGOR it is destroyed.
There is NO EVIDENCE!"!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL you mistake the mere use of words for a reasoned argument. Saying the same thing in capital letters will not do it.
There are many things genetics is not the answer to. Tracing ancestry and population migration are 2 things it categorically IS the answer to. It trumps all else. If "Out of Africa" is debunked, then you have to come up with something more compelling than genetics to back that up. You haven't because you can't. You won't do any time soon for the same reason.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
Evidence against out of Africa-
1, DARWIN evolution theory is based on monkey theory. THERE is NO MISSING LINK!!
2, We are more closely related to PIGS then monkeys as DNA is closer. Which destroys the theory.
3, HUMANITY is linked back to ASIA as almost all race is traced to ASIA, which fits as it is ASIAN culture, religions, art, musical instruments, philosophy, pyramids, LANGUAGES, culture etc etc is root of all.
Go search where the word AFRICA comes from, its not ROMAN!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL what exactly is "monkey theory"? You're correct about one thing - there is no missing link. We are on the same ancestral tree as apes and are our closest non-human cousins are chimpanzees. You're just wrong about pigs. Categorically so. Many people can trace their ancestry to asia but the simple fact is EVERY asian's ancestry traces back to Africa, as does every other human's ancestry. I don't give a flying fuck where the word Africa comes from. It's irrelevant.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
You resort to manipulation just shows how your RELIGION of DARWINISM is flawed!!
As I stated the MONKEY theory is based on many many believes, that we are linked to monkeys yet there is NO MISSING link!! Which is based on FAITH!!
We have nothing in common with monkeys, as for DNA all is linked, even banana we share 50% dna & ;pigs has is almost 98%!! I have stated FACTS about PIGS.
out of africa theory, DEBUNKED!!
WE DO NOT ORIGINATE FROM AFRICA, show me ONE EVIDENCE!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL my "religion" of Darwinism is right up there next to my "religion" of Newtonism and my "religion" of "Ampereism". LOL.
Manipulation? Please explain.
Yes, I agree, there is no missing link, though I can't see how you don't find that a defeater for your own argument. Nothing in common with chimps? Full body hair in the womb? Genes to grow a tail? Hands with opposable thumbs? Omnivorous teeth? 5 toes? 5 fingers? 16 Shared ERV insertions in exactly the same location? LOL
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL no one's even certain we couldn't interbreed with chimps, that's how similar we are. You're just wrong about pigs. We are more distantly related to them than we are to chimps. There's no argument.
Again, typing DEBUNKED in capital letters is not an argument. Cite me some compelling evidence.
Evidence FOR the out of Africa theory - erm - did you happen to watch the video? Perhaps you've heard of the genographic project? I'd start with their website.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
I quote u "no ones certain we couldn't interbreed with chimps, thats how similar we are"YOUR WORDS, so UNCERTAIN, ZERO EVIDENCE, this alone shows how baseless the MONKEY theory is & based on FAITH FANTASY, yet you are deluded!!!
Its too funny!!
ps, MONEKY SPERM/EGGS failed to breed with humans!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL what's really funny is your complete inability to get the point. We are genetically similar enough to chimps that interbreeding could be possible. We are absolutely certain we cannot interbreed with pigs. Chimpanzees are not monkeys. We separated from monkeys longer ago than apes. Look, you might as well just face up to the fact that your just not very bright, which is why you keep making an ass of yourself. Either study up or keep your ignorance to yourself.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
"POSSIBLE" but unlikely as MONKEY HEARTS have failed on humans but PIG HEARTS are a success!!
In fact PIG STEM CELLS are far more polular in use, as they prived more success, as they are closer to humans then monkeys!!
Monkeys & chimps are different exactly just like HUMANS!!!
You have been TAKEN part & resort to FANTASY & LIES!!
You have shown nothing but delusion & a feeble attempt to manipulate!!
You have FAILED to counter any of my points!! FAILED., GO BACK & COUNTER!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL pig organ transplants are more successful thanks to a single gene that means they aren't so readily rejected by humans. The same goes for cows. You've mistaken this to mean that the pig genome is a closer match to humans than chimps, which is categorically, scientifically, emphatically incorrect.
Pig stem cells are not used in humans - BS, though there has been research to reprogram chimp stem cells for use in humans BECAUSE they are such a close match to begin with.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
You are looking very very foolish, I have exposed you, as many many others too!!! I can see hence you blocking them & erasing their comments!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL well you haven't yet remotely explained how it is you've "exposed" me. You're statements are factually incorrect as anyone, including you, can verify in a matter of minutes.
I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and say that these "many others" - who were the same person by the way, were/was a personal friend of yours, if not you yourself. I blocked him because he was spamming the comments and using sock-puppet accounts to thumb himself up. I make no apology for that.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
LOL your presumption is comical! WILD INDEED, just like black ignorance!!
u have NOT countered any of my points!! Not brought any evidence!!
1, MONKEY THEORY- baseless, as it relies on the MISSING LINK, which requires FAITH like any other religion but even more evidence against,
2, There is NO MISSING LINK found! Yet so many grand hoaxes, created to expand these lies.
3, BANANAS(50%), Lettuce(16%), share same DNA as human & PIGS almost 99%- Monkeys even less.
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL there's a difference between me not countering any of your points and you not realising you've been schooled. It's apparent you're just too dumb to realise that.
1. What missing link?
2. What missing link?
3. Since all life on earth is related by common ancestry, we'd expect to share a lot of DNA with other life, more so with things we're more closely related to like chimps, slightly less so with pigs, less so with carrots. You're demonstrably wrong about pigs.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
You deny the facts about pigs & MISSING LINK(which the monkey theory is hinged on), only exposes, your RELIGIOUS fervor.
Lets not forget these ancient MONKEY SKULLS are so rare, yet we find complete dinosaurs bones!!
THINK not reside in black ignorance!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL so as if we didn't have enough to go on to deduce you're an ignorant ass, you bring racism to the table as well.
I can forgive you're ranting nonsense, your deep level of ignorance on matters you yet feel compelled to comment on in the most obnoxious tone, even your attempts to slur me personally, but I won't tolerate racism. I'm actually surprised you have the internet in that cave you apparently live in. Fuck off pal. The journey is yours alone now.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
"RACISM"?? Your paranoia again!!
You are well in the BLACK abyss of ignorance, your words are meaningless!! I have brought evidence, which many, will ponder!! As they are doing!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL You've used the term '"black" ignorance' twice now. In native English this is a term attacking the intelligence of "black" people. So if that's not how you intended it then I retract my charge of racism. Can I ask you in that case, what is your first language?
Can I also ask you - have you looked at the genographic project website? Have you looked for scholarly articles related to human-chimp-pig DNA comparison? Do you understand what evidence is? or a theory?
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
LOL its too funny, BLACK is not a race you utter FOOL!! How ccan you cry racism#???
This is too funny!! Then you cry racism!!
YOU have a lot to learn about RACE!! BLACK has NEGATIVE QUALITY'S!!!
In fact to call people by colour not race is RACISM!!!
You can not tell the difference between RACE & colour only shows YOUR BLACK IGNORANCE & BLACK BIGOTRY!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@dj2baduk = BLACK with IGNORANCE!!
U THINK BLACK is a race LOLOLOL too funny!!! Is WHITE a race??? Pink??? YELLOW???? BLUE???
Too funny!!
No wonder you are in the BLACK ABYSS of pure IGNORANCE!!! Learn the difference between race & colour. No wonder u think we are from monkeys!!
I'll help you, COLOUR is not a racial feature!! We are different races, learn to KNOW different races!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL Oh dear. It's pretty clear that I don't consider black to be a race, but people who use terms like you did, do. You've demonstrated repeatedly now that you're a dimwit, so it's entirely reasonable for me to assume you'd be dimwitted with a racial slur as well (even if that's not what you meant to say).
You're going to help me? Now that is funny ;o)
You're clearly a waste of space. That was my last olive branch. You burned it then pissed all over it. Now fuck off.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
hehheheh you are too STUPID!!
How is "BLACK with ignorance" a racial slur??? Then you cry racism!! LEARN some CULTURE!!
Out of Africa- IS BLACK with BIGOTRY!!
Monkey theory- is BLACK with ignorance!!
As I already stated; Missing link+MONKEY theory+out of Africa= are all based on FANTASY with ZERO evidence as you have shown!
I have already stated with evidence. ie PIGS r closer to humans then monkeys, which shows!!
U have LOST in EPIC ways!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL keep telling yourself that, only do it while your fucking off please.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL so once again you've proven yourself to be an ignorant ass by espousing a conclusion not supported, in fact contradicted, by the facts of the matter.
You can call me a liar all you like. The only problem with that is that anyone can check the facts on this for themselves in minutes by looking them up on the internet, which is what you should have done before making an ass of yourself yet again.
Again, you're just not very bright. Best start facing up to it.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
So therefore we can not originate from Africa, as there is NO evidence!!
BRING SOLID EVIDENCE as I have done!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL well it's now apparent that as well as not understanding what a scientific theory is, you also don't understand what evidence is. Making a statement is not evidence - even if you put it in bold. You have to point me to some kind of scientific study that demonstrates the validity of your claims, specifically:
1. That humans are not ancestrally related to all other life on earth.
2. That modern human ancestry can't be traced to Africa.
3. That pigs are more human than chimps.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
Africans can be traced back to ASIA just look at EAST AFRICANS!!
"ASIANS can be traced back to Africa"= ABSOLUTE LIES show evidence!!
Why is it that there is AFRICAN INFLUENCE in civilization or human development BIT ASIA DOMINATES!??
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL what about East Africans? Please explain.
Asian ancestry is traced back to Africa through distinctive genetic markers that are inherited. By following this trail of markers, you can tell quite clearly which populations are descended from which other populations, as the video clearly explains. If you don't agree with this, you have to show why it's wrong. Modern examples of cultural influence are irrelevant.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
"Asian ancestry is traced back to Africa" what UTTER CRAP!!
1, YOU are not honest, you denied that PIGS are more closely related then monkeys NOW you think, that ASIANS have African genes, LOLOL!!
2, AFRICANS will have many many ASIAN GENES look at east/South Africa! No different to BANANAS as we share 50% DNA!!
THIS PROVES NOTHING
U are looking very desperate!! UR KIND thought KOLUMBUS discovered new worlds & imposed that racist belief.
U HAVE ZERO, ZERO EVIDENCE only FAITH!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL 1. Monkeys are more closely related to humans than pigs. Humans and monkeys share a more recent common ancestor than humans and pigs. That's a matter of scientific fact supported by homology and DNA analysis and accepted, based on this evidence, by every biologist in the world. LOL indeed.
2. You're talking about modern Africans and modern Asians. It's irrelevant. I'm talking about markers that go back tens of thousands of years.
You're a buffoon.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
hhehe Its too funny, I pity you!! I really do!! Like non free thinking being, you spew the same religious nonsense, with ZERO EVIDENCE!!
EVOLUTION is a THEORY!! MONKEY relation is a THEORY!! Out of AFRICA is another theory!! ALL BASELESS!! MISSING LINK
PIG HEARTS can be used yet monkeys cannot!
PIG DNA is closer, then monkeys!!
"by every biologist in the world" LOL go to ASIA/RUSSIA with this theory you will be laughed at!!
I have given EVIDENCE & FACTS, you have given A THEORY!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL have you looked at the genographic project website? If so, you have to explain how this is "zero evidence" and not in fact the strongest body of evidence we have for human ancestry and migration.
You do know that a "theory" in science is not a guess or a mere hypothesis but a framework that explains a body of evidence, don't you?
I've explained why pig/cow heart valves are used. You've ignored that, because you're an ass.
You give nothing. You're a buffoon.
dj2baduk 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
Everything will have a bit of everything, when it comes to DNA!!
The Monkey theory is baseless & debunked as I have shown. So the African theory is just that!
So will the geographic project!!
In fact you are doing more harm by spreading lies & misinfo!!
ALL WRONG, just like when people thought KULUMBUS discovered new worlds!! Same BIGOTS!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@dj2baduk
Show SOLID EVIDENCE!! Not DARWINIAN LIES!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
@TheSunStars1 ,,,sorry , but I'm going a lot back further than you,,,the hindu asiatic diagreeables were created with straight hollow black hair prior to the migration of africans populating the globe(pre-paleman) at a time when the only homo-sapiens on the planet were all negroid with no such thing as an indian or east indian,,,,try 45,000, b.c.,,,its a lot more going on than you have been taught,,take a trip to the motherland and get its real history,,," teach ".
getaura1 6 months ago
@TheSunStars1
"95-99% do have afro" what race are you speaking???
As for Egyptians, of course they are ASIAN, look at all of north Africa, they are from West Asia, which is where todays Arabs. The pyramid is a very very Asian architecture.
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 5 months ago
Adolf Seilachar & P.K. Bose, scientists: "One Billion-Year-Old fossil prove life began in India: AFP Washington reports in Science Magazine that German Scientist Adolf Seilachar and Indian Scientist P.K. Bose have unearthed fossil in Churhat a town in Madhya Pradesh, India which is 1.1 billion years old and has rolled back the evolutionary clock by more than 500 million years
Pyaar111 6 months ago
im curious? if we migrated out of africa 60.000yrs ago why have they recently found a 1.2million yr old carcation skull in spain? why have there also been finds of carcation skeletons of simular ages found in newzealand? very odd? man thinks hes so clever today and has answer to everything yet when confronted with somthing that dosent fit in with common acceptance its locked away and fogoten about?
ts3830 7 months ago
@ts3830 what's a carcation? At any rate, it's a well documented fact that there's been more than one migration from Africa of the "homo" lineage. That's not in dispute, nor is it "locked away and forgotten" as you say. That's utter bullshit. However that has nothing to do with the fact that modern humans are all descended from African's who left during the last migration. There is no human skeleton from New Zealand that's anything close to 1.2 million years old. That's just pure bullshit.
dj2baduk 7 months ago