In other words, he sacrificed himself to himself because it was the only way that he could convince himself to forgive us the evil act of eating an apple from a tree. Not to mention that he himself created it all, so he was responsible for the "fall".
This isn't good enough to be even a fairy-tale book.
Specifically at 2:13: Jesus took on evil onto himself to ultimately contend with evil, itself. Not so much sacrifice self to self.
Also, recall the eating of the apple (or whatever fruit) related to free will, versus an automaton humanity, which arguably would insinuate a God who doesn't trust us to begin with, though we continue to let him down. Yet he would be willing to die for us anyway. Pretty shocking and not my level of sympathy, by far.
In other words, he sacrificed himself to himself because it was the only way that he could convince himself to forgive us the evil act of eating an apple from a tree. Not to mention that he himself created it all, so he was responsible for the "fall".
This isn't good enough to be even a fairy-tale book.
raoskaos 2 years ago
/watch?v=fxeZp0goEZI
Specifically at 2:13: Jesus took on evil onto himself to ultimately contend with evil, itself. Not so much sacrifice self to self.
Also, recall the eating of the apple (or whatever fruit) related to free will, versus an automaton humanity, which arguably would insinuate a God who doesn't trust us to begin with, though we continue to let him down. Yet he would be willing to die for us anyway. Pretty shocking and not my level of sympathy, by far.
mowriter 1 year ago
if not we would still be lost
hannahr77 2 years ago