Japanese Type 90 tank documentary

[Auge2011]

it looks like Abram tank

[Iggy82xl]

@Auge2011

As other people already wrote, Type-90 is based on Leopard 2, not Abrams.

[yamaraion91]

Type 90; T-90? c'mon people

[uptop84]

i bet the japanese has already invented flying tanks or swimming tanks but their just not showing it.

[Vot63]

@uptop84 Most tanks are already amphibious. And if you want a "flying" tank, look no further than the old Mi-24.

[Iggy82xl]

@Vot63

Tanks are not amphibous. They submerge to cross river, and only when they have snorkel aparatus. M1 Abrams doesn't have the snorkel aparatus developed for the particular gas engine it uses, and it cannot ford rivers deeper than 1.6-.1.8 meters.

[hotrod4you2]

its way to flat on front

[hotrod4you2]

we would to understand what your saying

[thunderbolt445]

M1A1 Abrams anyone? Looks alot like the Abrams

[gosciu555]

@thunderbolt445

No it looks a lot more like a leo2

[aijinndou]

全般的に軍オタの語りっぷりがぱねえww

あとナレータアムロの人に声似てる、かも？

[megamicruise]

@aijinndou これは、昔ＣＧＴＶ（カーグラフィックＴＶ）で放送したものです­。

アムロの声に似てるもなにも、その本人（古谷 徹）ですからｗ

[CookiesAndGuns95]

Does it come with a cupholder?

[Gabpopp]

Bloody thing is in japanese.

[chimera0036]

Super fuckin' hot the ideea with lowing the tank - that-s the main advantage, except that it's quite slow while doing this...

[theGoldenAgeOfBoredo]

whats not good about this are the flat areas-no slopes..not good..

[Namolis]

@theGoldenAgeOfBoredo You're stuck in WWII. To get any meaningful "bounce off" effect from modern HEAT or KPs requires the armour to be as flat as the glacial plate you see there (or on any other modern tank for that matter). Turrets, on the other hand, need to be big enough for the gun. You could ofc imagine sliding tiny slices of armour from the front forward until the net effect is a slope like the Merkava IV, but now you've suddenly made the armour THINNER if hit from a high position.

[TankNutDave]

Perhaps because its a japanese tank on a japanese TV show?

[tankie2ndrtr]

Not that impressed tbh.