Yesterday I found a three headed cow and I think it evolved from a dolphin/tree hybrid because my retarded scientist friend Darwin said so... EVOLUTION IS BULL SH*T
There are 6800 and more genetic diseases caused by deleterious mutations, because there is no other kind of mutation.
READ TWICE: We know they are screwed up DNA coding because we can see the original fit condition in people who do not have the particular disease. Read AGAIN and again.
That means there is only genetic degradation shown in ALL the absolutely irrefutable physical evidence.
There is no evolution from simple towards complex.
The title is a fail. This video doesnt disproof creation at all. Nothing here showed how this REALLY happened, only what had to happen to have what we have today. Even more with the inbreeding, so so far-fetched... At the same time, why dont we have more fusions in chromosomes since that time? Probably because this one never really happened by chance (designed) and its only an attempt to explain the difference between us and chimps...
@Fantasticlist This video is not intended to disprove creation. Instead, it demonstrates how evolutionary theory can be used to generate testable predictions about what we should find IF evolution has occurred. Human chromosome #2 could have been designed to look as though it resulted from a fusion event, but such an assertion is not testable and therefore not scientific.
The fusion of chromosomes happens all the time in modern humans. Google "Robertsonian translocation."
@standup4REALscience We stay in the same. And sorry if the I misunderstood the intent of the video, but when you say that evolution is real immediately you have to assume that there is no creation. I do believe in evolution but also in a creation. A single root evolution is too far-fetched. They may happen today, but the result is not the same as going from 48 to 46 chromosomes.
@standup4REALscience Who the fuck cares?! Creation, Evolution both equally implausible. It is not true, it does not exist. Science is a game of theories and religion a game of speculation and hope-worship. They are both guessing! Anyway all this shit doesn't matter just function and die.
@gregrutz I'll stay with my pea brain and you can play around with your big brain and your useless theories and ideas that have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the realities of YOUR life NOW. Do you really care about 'evolution' and where you come from? How is this going to help you? Is it going to make you a better person? A more knowledgeable person? NO. You will only repeat facts like a computer and somehow feel good about this. Good luck to you!
@standup4REALscience This video is false. dinosaurs don't even exist it's just a hoax to convince us the world isn't flat even though it is. any smart person would know.
IF evolutionary argument were true, that we came from apes, the by the token of such, a homo sapiens should be able to breed with a genus gorilla, and produce offspring. But that is genetically improbable. Every known research has refuted it, thus the example above is bogus at best in relation to the chromosome theory..which is just that..THEORY!! Creation....Makes more sense.
@rmlrobl "IF evolutionary argument were true, that we came from apes, the by the token of such, a homo sapiens should be able to breed with a genus gorilla" => nope. If 2 species sharing a common descent has diverged far enough, they lose the ability to intermate. This can be seen with mosquitoes, seagulls...radiometric dating + genetic analysis indicate a divergence time between orangutan and humans to be ~ 18 Myr. That's more than enough for species to diverge far enough to prevent intermate.
@rmlrobl The video you linked to crams an amazing number of misconceptions, non sequitors, and outright falsehoods about evolution into 8 short minutes. It really should win an award for highest possible concentration of scientific ignorance. I mean really, it has them all: arguments from incredulity, the claim that there are no transitional fossils and no new species, confusing evolution and abiogenesis, and the 2nd law of thermodynamics! Truly magnificent!
C. The earth is not a closed system, it has a constant input of energy from the sun. As mentioned in the video you linked to, the 2LoT only applies to closed systems.
D. /watch?v=7e0Ic03c6f8
E. I'm a high school Biology teacher working to correct the misinformation promulgated by people like you. You can have a PhD in science and still be ignorant about evolution.
I agree..do you have a PhD? Nevermind, they may hurt you..
That aside,
You as an "educated" person must obviously know and realize there is some form of design in this world, some specific pattern & method it is following. If not, quit your day job. If so, then we come to what it all boils down to, an acceptance or rejection of God. Which I believe is the case here again.
You reject God bc u don't want to give up parts of ur life or the fallacy of control u think have.
@rmlrobl Sadly, you're wrong. I am a Christian. I believe in God. You are operating on the false assumption that acceptance of evolution means a rejection of God.
If you deny Genesis 1, then you reject God's Word, Read John 1. So yea, you are.
If you accept evolution within a species, fine. Evolution as how life began and we came from primordial soup..no. (Assuming you believe in the God of the Bible as you say you are a Christian.)
@rmlrobl I do not deny Genesis 1. I just interpret the creation story differently than you do. It's too bad that a literal interpretation of God's Word requires you to deny so much of the evidence contained in God's World. Maybe it's time to reconsider your method of interpretation?
@rmlrobl 1) The Creation stor(ies) in Genesis reflect the understandings of the people who wrote down the stories thousands of years ago. I think the knowledge we have gained since the Bible was written should inform how we interpret Biblical stories that describe prehistorical events. As described in this video, I accept the evidence that humans evolved from pre-human ancestors. This is not a belief based on scripture but a conclusion based on evidence.
Then you must question your Christianity. Sorry, but either the Bible is truth or it is not. If you are truly Christian, you must believe it is..al of it. Noah, Jonah, Creation, etc...if not...you have issues with God.
@rmlrobl Do you believe in the firmament (raqiya`) that separates the oceans from the water above (Genesis 1:6-8)? The author(s) of Genesis clearly did. If you don't believe in the firmament, then you are allowing our modern scientific knowledge to influence how you interpret the Bible.
Creationists are AWESOME! I mean, really, science thinks that smoking causes cancer...but thanks to creationists....I know not to trust science, so smoke away! Science also suggests that drug use is bad....but thankfully...someone who has an associates degree in truthology from christian tech outranks someone with a doctorate in biology...According to creationists....You don't need college to get an eduation, just sunday morning committments!
Creationists can only use arguments like "oh evolution is faith-based ,therefore it's a religion", or "evolutionists have no proof, only guesses". That's not scientific criticism. That's a person bitching and moaning. A true scientific criticism should go "in the article published in year X by authors Y in journal Z titled ABC, figure 4 shows this...etc etc. The presentation for this evidence is wrong because the following assumptions/assertions are violated: number 1...etc etc"
Not long ago, 2 evolutionary scientists named Dr. Sydney Fox, and Dr. Stanley Miller tried to create life from producing an electric spark into a mixture of chemicals and water (as they say this is how life started in evolution). All they succeeded in creating was a simple, lifeless amino acid.
@dj00009 No sane person wants science to stop. People have been brainwashed especially at universities to believe that evolution and science are the same thing.No wonder 74% of graduates in US believe in evolution according to the last gallup poll.Evolutionists claim thats because the grads have been highly educated. Evolution has been perpetuated byinterpretations of scientific facts with multitudes of assumptions,and witha bias to the belief that there is no intelligent design
Evolution can't be trusted as fact. Since we are discovering new information daily there is no way for any human being to say " This is the way it is " . New information will always be coming in and anyone who just accepts evolution as fact doesn't respect any information that may come at a later date.
nice video except for the fact that evolution is a THEORY, which means it is not proven and is probably false. so did some apes just stop evolving while others evolved into humans? yeah right. evolution can be disproven very easily while creation can NOT be disproven.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Charles Darwin wasn't even a scientist by our standards today. He wasn't smart enough to study medicine (as his parents wished), had only a bachelor's degree (no Ph.D. at all) not in science but in THEOLOGY, and just happened to draw nice pictures and invent a pseudoscientific theory that has never been proven. And to think this theory is taught as fact, is shoved down children's throats, and that Darwin is worshipped as a god is ridiculous.
@BachScholar Yes, it is ridiculous to think that "[evolutionary] theory is taught as fact" or that it is "shoved down children's throats" or that "Darwin is worshipped as a god."
Good thing no rational person would believe such ridiculous things!
@6630mcdo REAL scientific theories must be testable and falsifiable, and they must employ explanatory mechanisms that are observable and repeatable. As explained in my videos, the explanation of common ancestry is both testable and falsifiable. The mechanisms of evolutionary change are observable in nature and repeatable in laboratory experiments. Clearly, evolution is REAL science. It fulfills even the most restrictive definitions of science.
@standup4REALscience No, you are wrong. The entire process from beginning of the claimed science until the end must be repeatable. Picking a process of one billionth the time scale does NOT meant the requirement.
@6630mcdo In scientific method, the STEPS to do the experiment need to be repeatable. This is true for evolution. If I study homologs, and I use a series of steps to deduce approximately when two homologs diverge from a common ancestral gene, those series of steps are indeed repeatable. And not all scientific studies have to be observable. This relates to the whole field of bayesian inferences + Monte Carlo simulations.
@flyingscience2 sheesh, you creationists -_- your not a scientist ,are you ?? Evolution is accepted in the entire science community and in the whole education system , who do you think you are ?
Evolution is always argued , Still is , Well , why can't you just accept this , God created the big bang and then everything itself replicated and created life, Fine happy now ? btw only 96 % of our universe is made of the periodic table, means atoms ,Rest is just is possible to explain.
@flyingscience2 i know more history then you , also the world is wrong and you are right ? thats a wrong ideology , Also for a second If i deny Evolution and Big bang theory , Tell me how life arose ? tell me what hapened ? tell me who created us ? Tell me how we are created ? Tell me what is this universe and black holes ? Tell me , I want your theories on it , and theories which explain every detail of it, and of evolution , of cells, human bodies , Biology .Tell me .
@djay00009 I asked you for one piece of evidence for your ridicules theory of Darwinian evolution and you instead deflected the question.
I have studied the so called evidence for macro evolution and found fault in every bit of it.
I challenged you to support your stupid theory because I am confident that I have already seen the evidence before and have disputed it with fact and science.
@flyingscience2 Im getting tired of Explaining it , I'll write you in a mail then , Evidences cannot be shown in a comment :D I cannot dig a dinosaur bone and show you mate , Its ridiculous XD
I'll tell you a few basic ones in a message , fine ? :D
@djay00009 You can send a private message to me if you like.
I should say that since DNA makes evolution imposable I expect to get from you 1 or more of the following, speculation, assertion, wishful thinking or lies.
These have been the backbone of Darwin's evolutionary evidence since day 1.
But have at it mate.
Macro evolution has already been proven imposable by recent genetic research.
Evolutionists will not let go of their theory but that isn't my problem.
1) "The universal genetic code. All cells on Earth, from our white blood cells, to simple bacteria, to cells in the leaves of trees, are capable of reading any piece of DNA from any life form on Earth. This is very strong evidence for a common ancestor from which all life descended."
@flyingscience2 believe whatever you want to believe , but don't ever think science should stop , It never will . The Same science which studies biology helps to get you healthcare ,Do not forget , you have internet because of science . We have evolved so far , its amazing and staggering , People can believe in religion all they want , This happened during renaissance :) If your from a developed nation , you should owe it to Science and the humans who made it possible for u live like this.
@djay00009 2) "2. The fossil record. The fossil record shows that the simplest fossils will be found in the oldest rocks, and it can also show a smooth and gradual transition from one form of life to another."
This is a funny one.
They age the strata by the fossils found in them.
They age the fossils by the strata they are found in.
They calibrate radiometric dating systems by the expected age deduced from this circular reasoning, LOL.
@djay00009 Lets continue to prove your evidence wrong djay.
#3) "3. Genetic commonalities. Human beings have approximately 96% of genes in common with chimpanzees, about 90% of genes in common with cats (source), 80% with cows (source), 75% with mice (source), and so on."
Those numbers come from Yale DNA Hybridization Study by Charles Sibley and Jon Ahlquist.
The study was exposed as fraud almost as soon as it was published in the 1980s.
@djay00009 Lets continue to prove your evidence wrong djay.
#3) "3. Genetic commonalities. Human beings have approximately 96% of genes in common with chimpanzees, about 90% of genes in common with cats (source), 80% with cows (source), 75% with mice (source), and so on."
Those numbers come from Yale DNA Hybridization Study by Charles Sibley and Jon Ahlquist.
The study was exposed as fraud almost as soon as it was published in the 1980s.
4) "as embryos, all these life forms have gill slits, tails, and specific anatomical structures involving the spine. For humans (and other non-fish) the gill slits reform into the bones of the ear and jaw at a later stage in development."
This fraud was discovered over 100 years ago.
Ernst Haeckel totally made up his evidence for this.
Think about it.
If gill slits don't form into anything related to breathing, why say they are gill slits? LOL
4) "In fact, pig embryos are often dissected in biology classes because of how similar they look to human embryos. These common characteristics could only be possible if all members of the phylum Chordata descended from a common ancestor.
@djay00009 5) "5. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Bacteria colonies can only build up a resistance to antibiotics through evolution. It is important to note that in every colony of bacteria, there are a tiny few individuals which are naturally resistant to certain antibiotics. This is because of the random nature of mutations"
So a bacteria "evolved" into a ..................bacteria!!! LOL
@BachScholar Is there a point embedded somewhere in your rambling? Are you upset that evolution is irrefutable? By slamming Darwin do you feel slightly better that god did not create man? :( Darwin did not have a phd in truthology from bible university, but he was accurate and correct about evolution by natural selection. BTW - A theory explains a fact. The theory of plate tectonics explains the fact that continents drift. Evolution is proven by ERVs, chromosomal fusion and the fossil record.
there is no universal meaning to life, the meaning of life is what you make it. what you do with your life provides the meaning and every human being has the potential to provide meaning to their own existence. the purpose of religion has been to fill the void of what can not be expanded through science and exhibits an absolute refusal to to seek out this unexplained. we must cast asunder these puritanic ideals if we are to progress as a species.
It truly amazes me how people think the most advance information storage systems in the known universe, evolved randomly over millions of years. the most advanced optical systems evolved over millions of years. not only do these systems exists on a physical level but also on an almost digital level coded within the DNA structure. lets put this thing in its rightful place, all of nature looks like it was designed by a mastermind.
You believe in a made up fairy tale based on no evidence over the most scientifically respected theory on how we got here because it makes you feel happy, and HE'S the one that needs to grow up?
@slipperywhenwet5 Guess what, science has linked all mans mtDNA to one woman and guess what they call her? Mitochodrial EVE, science just proved the Genesis account LOL.
Look up microchodrial Eve, click the wikipedia link, scroll to "Common Fallacies". Oh, lookie!
"One of the misconceptions of mitochondrial Eve is that since all women alive today descended in a direct unbroken female line from her that she was the only woman alive at the time. However nuclear DNA studies indicate that the size of the ancient human population never dropped below some tens of thousands; there were many other women around at Eve's time with descendants alive today."
@RespectMyHate WIKIPEDIA, which is a accumulation of knowledge that occasionally is grieved by trolls to be stupid and very outlandish. This sentence and the sentences after that I couldn't fit into the comment (500 character limit) has a source that links to a valid scientific study on evolution.
Ill take peer reviewed scientific studies over the Bible (which is apparently true, because the Bible says so) any day.
You wanna believe we're made of magic dirt, go ahead.
@slipperywhenwet5 I can tell you've never took a biology class, because we are made of dirt. Carbon, Hydrogen, oxygen, Phosphorus, potassium, iodine, nitrogen, sulfur, calcium, and iron, along with 20 other trace amounts of other elements. If you really want to take this a step farther, you can go to home depot and buy everything it takes to build a human, I'll leave that task up to the God hating scientist though, BIBLE WINS AGAIN.
To say that evolution is real is to say that life was created at random and there is no point or purpose for living. It means that we are all basically worthless and unimportant. Sorry, I don't believe that. I think that there is a reason why I was born and my life is not purposeless.
@Tam15Singer Random processes produce the genetic variety that is the fount of evolutionary change. These are the very same processes that made you a genetically distinct individual. If you think evolution leads to a life without purpose, then so does meiosis and fertilization. Think about it.
@Tam15Singer Natural selection is not random. Sexual selection is not random. Is your ego so fragile that you have to believe that everything was specially made for you? Can you not see how much more it says about us that we adapted to become the dominate species on the planet by becoming smarter than the things that would kill us off? Why do you insist that your god can't use evolution as it's mechanism? Is it so important to you to have a small god?
Your argument is the classically based on your own ego and not science. You are effectively admitting that you CHOOSE to believe what you want to be true, regardless of whether or not it is. It is your self important ego that drives you to believe that your life is special and has a designed purpose. I think that everything in the universe is an absolute miracle, but not attributed to an invisible old man living in the sky.
@Tam15Singer "To say that evolution is real is to say that life was created at random.." Wrong. Evolution doesn't say how we were created, just what happens to already living things. I really wish people would get a proper education before spouting off nonsense, almost always religious in nature. Only a deeply religious person would have the gall, armed with less than a GED at times, to say that scientists all around the world are completely wrong.
@Tam15Singer First, I am a Christian that finds no problem with accepting evolution, and second, even if Christianity was wrong, we do have purpose, though perhaps a less glorious one. To carry on our DNA, to ensure our genetic code survives.
@Tam15Singer There is absolutely nothing about your having evolved that means you have to live a "meaningless" or "purposeless" life.
The theory of evolution does not address how life emerged. Only how new species emerge. Scientists are still working to find out how life came about. But it's already safe to say that much of it was not random. It had to be a process governed by the properties of several basic chemicals.
@Tam15Singer The reason you were born is because at some point, for better or worse, your father and mother decided to have sex. As a result of that, millions upon millions of sperm competed to fertilize your mother's egg, Even if you disregard evolution, for whatever pathetic reason that may be, it was simple chance that that specific sperm "won". It could have easily been a different one. And if it was, you wouldn't even be here to tell me that evolution isn't "real".
@Tam15Singer evolution says nothing about how it all began. What you're talking about is called abiogenesis. Evolution describes everything after the fact. Also your life is not purposeless. Stop looking for an external locus of control to give you that meaning, grab life by the balls and find it for yourself.
Wow! By the comments here our world is in real trouble. Facts and evidence just does not seem to be enough to get people to think for themselves yet. Think for yourselves people. Science has no reason or way to lie. But your preachers and clergy have every reason to continue the lie, they want your money and your votes. It continues to be the most successful fraud of all times. They feed on human fear and guilt shamelessly and promise a salvation they cannot give.
Someone explain this to me. If we exist at this point in time, something had to start the cycle of life. Let us just assume that you are right and evolution started it. What was before ev olution, what was before the big bang, what was before that, and what was before that, and what was before that? I mean, in order for something to exist...there has to be a cause for it to exist. SOMETHING HAD TO ALWAYS EXIST....AND IF IT WASN'T GOD...What was it? Energy? I don't think so.
@TheGreekMan1981 ok lets assume evolution is right. scientists dont have all the answers but if they got this one right(evolution). then u can make the assumption that the biblical idea of creation is wrong. now if we asume that the bible is wrong then we have to come up w/ another theory hence the big bang. its not some easy thing to prove like 2+2 =4. but they have looked far into space/ further than any one in biblical times. they can see that the universe was compact and possibly exploded.
@sariglenn My friend, evil-lution isn't fact at all. It has many holes. If you would prefer to believe that you evolved from a worm, you have every right to do so. I 100% know that I didn't evolve from anything. I am a creation of God Almighty.
Something has had to always exist. Since science itself proves that there was a start to time, we know that something has to be infinite. You go ahead and put your full faith in science. I just simply disagree.
@TheGreekMan1981 YOU STATED " lets assume ur right and evolution started it" . from that very comment we have to come up with another reason for the creation of the universe.and that is why we have the big bang & evolution. b/c its the best model there is. u cant take 1 idea( the bible) and say, ok its the truth we dont need to look any further. done deal there is a god...u have to look at other options. and in this information we should be able to conclude how we came to be. if by a god or not
@sariglenn I'm not angry that people accept evolution as their own personal truth ( although I disagree ). My problem is that evolution isn't as scientific as people make it out to be. I could take a weak minded person and convince them of Christianity, and a proffesor at a university could take a weak minded person and convince them evolution is fact.
The truth is, evolution isn't a fact. It cannot be proven. It is a religion. If it were fact you wouldn't have Christian Scientists
Maybe, that's the way God made it. Maybe, Adam and Eve were early representations of mankind through this evolution. Maybe, they were just a fairy tale and were just man's way of explaining away how they came to be. Maybe, there is a God and He laughs when we get it right just as much as when we get it wrong.
@DjRalfy : You are either a person who does not believe in a God or you are a Satanist who uses foul language to address the God of the universe. One of the most evil humans I ever met used that same description of God and he was a Satanist. I feel sorry for you.
@pmoyer50 I am nothing like a satanist. I am actually a very nice and considerate person who finds humor in religion. I am just an ordinary guy who lost faith just with the few years i've lived in this cruel world. Satanist are worth ridiculing also and I dont respect. I am sorry if I offended you with the "foul language" I used in my last comment. What I was trying to say that if there is a God who created this cruel world with cruel people.. doesnt that make him nothing but a cruel God?
@DjRalfy : Apology accepted and I must reciprocate for assuming things. I do know what you are expressing. For me, it's not that I deny the existence of God - rather I question why He has allowed people to do what they do. If God created all then that means emotions, too. Sin had to be a factor. Did you ever play army with little plastic men when you were a kid. It's just a game. In a way, God is playing the same game and it's for real with casualties and consequences if we don't dance right.
@pmoyer50 All deistic theory makes sense if you dont think about it. I recommend you type this in the youtube search bar and watch the first video that appears. >.> Re: 5 Questions for Atheists.
That kid explains everything I try to preach on the daily basis.
lol mybad about the caps. But ya that is what u think about God... i dint kno the world was based on what u say or when God does judge yu, he will judge you on what u think. No. he wil judge u as a judge if u broke his moral law like everyone has. But if you accept Jesus Christ God will judge u as a father =) and y wouldnt you want to have God answer your prayers and be in control of your life, we all fail without him. Its ur choice to accept Jesus and have prayers answerd, idk y wouldnt??
Cuz its the only one science PROVES to be true. all other bibles besides the Holy Bible fail when it comes to prophecy and science. Scientist have not found one error or proved not one single thing in the Holy bible to be untrue.How can man diss prove God lol?
REAL SCIENCE PROVES THE HOLY BIBLE TO BE TRUE. GOD KNEW PPL WERE GOING TO TRY TO PROVE IT WRONG AND THAT IS WHY HE HAD PROFITS WRITE THESE "DISCOVERIES" THAT SCIENTIST ARE JUST FINDING OUT NOW WHEN THEY COULD OF LOOKED WHAT WAS WRITTIN IN THE BIBLE THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. UNLESS YOU REPENT U WILL PERISH. UR MISSING OUT ON LIVING WITH GOD RIGHT NOW IF U DONT PERSONALLY KNOW JESUS CHRIST. IM NOT TELLIN YOU TO SERVE HIM, HE IS YOUR GOD, U CHOOSE TO SERVE HIM OR NOT. UR JUDGE IS WAITING AT THE DOOR
@travv444 Why just the bible true? lol who knows there is 1000 or even more religion that exist and suddenly the bible have to be the true one of all the ones....
i find it a threat that god says "believe in my son or die." don't you? ;)
also, i think a gos would be m,ore just than to just send you to hell even if you are lets say the Gandhi of your time and save millions, but don't believe in Jesus so u get to burn in hell ;)
and lastly, science and the bible are totally different. please prove to me how adam just popped into existence. thank you ;)
@boxtrap21 Your religion teacher is insane, that's about the best you can make of that. I can think of worse things to make of it though. Why, for example, is your religion teacher lying to you?
@rozeboosje - He clearly suffers from the inherited mental problems prevalent in his family, but his outsize ego won't let him get professional help and the medications he needs, unlike other family members. Normally I'd agree it's not appropriate to make fun of those who are 'not playing with a full deck', but GSFY is such an unpleasant, dishonest and abusive individual he deserves everything he gets.
@KrokrX I can see what you mean by "unpleasant" and "abusive" alright. He treated me to some of that when I commented on his video "Final Proof of Evolution Falsified" [snicker] but in fairness it doesn't really bother me; I see it for the impotent rage that it is.
@rozeboosje - you may like to watch a recent video by AlanCFA(v=6jTpiom836U) which deals with some of his dishonesty, vile accusations and abusive behavior, and 'imaginative' ideas about evolution(e.g. humans mated with gorillas!). GSFY has said he's preparing a series that will ''wipe out the religion of Evodelusionism from science' and that should give him a fair crack at the Golden Crocoduck he missed out on a few years ago(although he did beat Nephi that year).
@nolobede Evodelusionism is a religion. Evolution: "that theory which sees inn the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language. This never has happened in DNA. Only gene loss, atavisms, general degradation of genomic expressions from the fit to the less fit for survival.
@GSFY "...Only gene loss, atavisms, general degradation of genomic expressions from the fit to the less fit for survival." So, you think that atavisms show a degradation from a more advanced individual? Humans are sometimes born with tails - not simply "at sacks" like Creationists claim, but working tails with muscle and blood supply.
Per your theory, this means that the human ancestor DID have a tail (in agreement with the theory of evolution), but that ancestor was MORE advanced than humans
@nolobede What does creationism have to to with this; Evolution: "that theory which sees inn the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language. I have never seen this in evidence. It does not exist. It is an ideology only, a religious idea.
Lacking the ability to evaluate evidence without a bias (religious agenda for instance) does not diminish the vastness of evidence and fact of evolution.
"I have never seen this in evidence. It does not exist"
@standup4REALscience the fossil record? there are clear gaps in the fossil record, you learn that in bio. do you know darwins occupation... he was a naturalist not an "EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGIST"(WOOOOOO). furthermore think about it why dont all the apes evolve already
@malikidmc "Think about why don't all apes evolve already." All of the ancestors of the great apes have long since been dead. The lineages split creating the great apes, with us being one of the species coming from the divergence. The ancestors of us are long dead. That is why there are still chimpanzees, because we did not come from chimpanzees. Chimps and Humans diverged from a common ancestor, that is why they are still here. Ardipithecus -- one of our famous ancestors -- is no longer here.
@malikidmc "furthermore think about it why dont all the apes evolve already" you are the one who needs to think about this, because it the question shows you have not studied evolutionary theory, at all. It's like asking "since the united states was originally a colony of england, why is there still england?"
@malikidmc thats like asking why were not all black or white not to be racist but different environments different variables im not trying to be racist
because my fine sir. they do not need to anymore, like us. they can no longer evolve to become as smart as us because we are already this smart. in essence, they cannot fill in a space that has already been taken
@standup4REALscience What evidence are you talking about? I have studied this for over 42 years, read over 21,000 papers on this and all there is is gene loss, gene expression loss, defects that cause genetic diseases, and reduced fitness.
GSFY - Jimmy, no-one believes you, you've never read anything like 21,000 papers, you're a failed hot-tub salesman who didn't even complete high-school, and you tell lies to try to gain the credibility you can't earn. You're so dishonest you embezzled funds from your own family, that's really low. Sadly, all those years with the Jehovah's Witnesses and Siddha Yoga cult(17yrs) must have scrambled what little intellect you were born with. Get professional help and take the medications offered.
Yesterday I found a three headed cow and I think it evolved from a dolphin/tree hybrid because my retarded scientist friend Darwin said so... EVOLUTION IS BULL SH*T
stat2211 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are 6800 and more genetic diseases caused by deleterious mutations, because there is no other kind of mutation.
READ TWICE: We know they are screwed up DNA coding because we can see the original fit condition in people who do not have the particular disease. Read AGAIN and again.
That means there is only genetic degradation shown in ALL the absolutely irrefutable physical evidence.
There is no evolution from simple towards complex.
There are ZERO positive mutations in humans.
GoodScienceForYou 1 week ago
EVOLUTION IS FAKE WHY DO YOU THINK THAT MONKEY DONT TURN INTO HUMANS ANYMORE!
Waffl3z321 2 weeks ago
THE EARTH IS FLAT. GOD IS THE ONLY WAY TO LIVE!!!!!
ikwhereyoulive00 3 weeks ago
bahahaha this is a joke
NWOkillaful 1 month ago
Pardon my ``tres terrible`` English .
pcrvg0808 1 month ago
My guess is 23 .
pcrvg0808 1 month ago
I wonder how many chromosome numbers does a sasquatch / yeti / big foot ( you know? ) have .
pcrvg0808 1 month ago
The title is a fail. This video doesnt disproof creation at all. Nothing here showed how this REALLY happened, only what had to happen to have what we have today. Even more with the inbreeding, so so far-fetched... At the same time, why dont we have more fusions in chromosomes since that time? Probably because this one never really happened by chance (designed) and its only an attempt to explain the difference between us and chimps...
Fantasticlist 1 month ago in playlist Proof of Evolution
@Fantasticlist This video is not intended to disprove creation. Instead, it demonstrates how evolutionary theory can be used to generate testable predictions about what we should find IF evolution has occurred. Human chromosome #2 could have been designed to look as though it resulted from a fusion event, but such an assertion is not testable and therefore not scientific.
The fusion of chromosomes happens all the time in modern humans. Google "Robertsonian translocation."
standup4REALscience 1 month ago 3
@standup4REALscience We stay in the same. And sorry if the I misunderstood the intent of the video, but when you say that evolution is real immediately you have to assume that there is no creation. I do believe in evolution but also in a creation. A single root evolution is too far-fetched. They may happen today, but the result is not the same as going from 48 to 46 chromosomes.
Fantasticlist 1 month ago
@standup4REALscience Who the fuck cares?! Creation, Evolution both equally implausible. It is not true, it does not exist. Science is a game of theories and religion a game of speculation and hope-worship. They are both guessing! Anyway all this shit doesn't matter just function and die.
Josephjoel3 1 month ago
@Josephjoel3 Science knows more than your pea brain can imagine.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz I'll stay with my pea brain and you can play around with your big brain and your useless theories and ideas that have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the realities of YOUR life NOW. Do you really care about 'evolution' and where you come from? How is this going to help you? Is it going to make you a better person? A more knowledgeable person? NO. You will only repeat facts like a computer and somehow feel good about this. Good luck to you!
Josephjoel3 1 month ago
@Josephjoel3 Stay stupid, I don't care.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@standup4REALscience This video is false. dinosaurs don't even exist it's just a hoax to convince us the world isn't flat even though it is. any smart person would know.
ikwhereyoulive00 3 weeks ago
@Fantasticlist The title is a fail. This video doesnt disproof creation at all.
And where, exactly, in the title does it say that this video disproves creation?
419Films 1 month ago
@SU4RS
IF evolutionary argument were true, that we came from apes, the by the token of such, a homo sapiens should be able to breed with a genus gorilla, and produce offspring. But that is genetically improbable. Every known research has refuted it, thus the example above is bogus at best in relation to the chromosome theory..which is just that..THEORY!! Creation....Makes more sense.
rmlrobl 2 months ago
@rmlrobl "IF evolutionary argument were true, that we came from apes, the by the token of such, a homo sapiens should be able to breed with a genus gorilla" => nope. If 2 species sharing a common descent has diverged far enough, they lose the ability to intermate. This can be seen with mosquitoes, seagulls...radiometric dating + genetic analysis indicate a divergence time between orangutan and humans to be ~ 18 Myr. That's more than enough for species to diverge far enough to prevent intermate.
Casshyr 2 months ago
/watch?NR=1&v=Ap3wZmXyh4A
rmlrobl 2 months ago
@rmlrobl The video you linked to crams an amazing number of misconceptions, non sequitors, and outright falsehoods about evolution into 8 short minutes. It really should win an award for highest possible concentration of scientific ignorance. I mean really, it has them all: arguments from incredulity, the claim that there are no transitional fossils and no new species, confusing evolution and abiogenesis, and the 2nd law of thermodynamics! Truly magnificent!
standup4REALscience 2 months ago
@standup4REALscience
OK, then:
A: Show proof of the transitional fossils
b: Show proof of NEW species in our lifetime that came from another species.
c: How do you refute the 2nd law of Thermodynamics as not able to refute evolution?
d DNA?
e: Scientific ignorance? What degree do you hold or what sources can you present?
rmlrobl 2 months ago
@rmlrobl
A. /watch?v=l_Dad_GhkT4
B. Google "Observed Instances of Speciation"
C. The earth is not a closed system, it has a constant input of energy from the sun. As mentioned in the video you linked to, the 2LoT only applies to closed systems.
D. /watch?v=7e0Ic03c6f8
E. I'm a high school Biology teacher working to correct the misinformation promulgated by people like you. You can have a PhD in science and still be ignorant about evolution.
standup4REALscience 2 months ago 5
@standup4REALscience
I agree..do you have a PhD? Nevermind, they may hurt you..
That aside,
You as an "educated" person must obviously know and realize there is some form of design in this world, some specific pattern & method it is following. If not, quit your day job. If so, then we come to what it all boils down to, an acceptance or rejection of God. Which I believe is the case here again.
You reject God bc u don't want to give up parts of ur life or the fallacy of control u think have.
rmlrobl 2 months ago
@rmlrobl Sadly, you're wrong. I am a Christian. I believe in God. You are operating on the false assumption that acceptance of evolution means a rejection of God.
standup4REALscience 2 months ago
@standup4REALscience
If you deny Genesis 1, then you reject God's Word, Read John 1. So yea, you are.
If you accept evolution within a species, fine. Evolution as how life began and we came from primordial soup..no. (Assuming you believe in the God of the Bible as you say you are a Christian.)
rmlrobl 2 months ago
@rmlrobl I do not deny Genesis 1. I just interpret the creation story differently than you do. It's too bad that a literal interpretation of God's Word requires you to deny so much of the evidence contained in God's World. Maybe it's time to reconsider your method of interpretation?
standup4REALscience 2 months ago
@standup4REALscience
I did the justice of watching a listening to the videos, as I should have.
1) Please explain how you see GENESIS 1. Namely, where humans/homo sapiens came from.
2) Explain your interpretation of this video that we came from apes and how that relates to Genesis 1.
rmlrobl 2 months ago
@rmlrobl 1) The Creation stor(ies) in Genesis reflect the understandings of the people who wrote down the stories thousands of years ago. I think the knowledge we have gained since the Bible was written should inform how we interpret Biblical stories that describe prehistorical events. As described in this video, I accept the evidence that humans evolved from pre-human ancestors. This is not a belief based on scripture but a conclusion based on evidence.
standup4REALscience 2 months ago
@standup4REALscience
Then you must question your Christianity. Sorry, but either the Bible is truth or it is not. If you are truly Christian, you must believe it is..al of it. Noah, Jonah, Creation, etc...if not...you have issues with God.
rmlrobl 2 months ago
@rmlrobl Do you believe in the firmament (raqiya`) that separates the oceans from the water above (Genesis 1:6-8)? The author(s) of Genesis clearly did. If you don't believe in the firmament, then you are allowing our modern scientific knowledge to influence how you interpret the Bible.
standup4REALscience 2 months ago
@standup4REALscience using big words doesn't make you Einstein, chief
ikwhereyoulive00 3 weeks ago
Creationists are AWESOME! I mean, really, science thinks that smoking causes cancer...but thanks to creationists....I know not to trust science, so smoke away! Science also suggests that drug use is bad....but thankfully...someone who has an associates degree in truthology from christian tech outranks someone with a doctorate in biology...According to creationists....You don't need college to get an eduation, just sunday morning committments!
pillowbugg 2 months ago
@Conoryoshiman said the ape using the internet.
Aanthanur 2 months ago
Excellent work here!
bushonomics 2 months ago
Creationists can only use arguments like "oh evolution is faith-based ,therefore it's a religion", or "evolutionists have no proof, only guesses". That's not scientific criticism. That's a person bitching and moaning. A true scientific criticism should go "in the article published in year X by authors Y in journal Z titled ABC, figure 4 shows this...etc etc. The presentation for this evidence is wrong because the following assumptions/assertions are violated: number 1...etc etc"
Casshyr 2 months ago
@Conoryoshiman I am afraid that we are all apes.
kairobinson 3 months ago
Not long ago, 2 evolutionary scientists named Dr. Sydney Fox, and Dr. Stanley Miller tried to create life from producing an electric spark into a mixture of chemicals and water (as they say this is how life started in evolution). All they succeeded in creating was a simple, lifeless amino acid.
PHELCAN 3 months ago
@PHELCAN the very basis of all living things. formed by natural causes without any gods or other fantasy creatures.
Aanthanur 2 months ago
@Aanthanur you need more than amino acids to create any life form.
PHELCAN 2 months ago
@PHELCAN i know, and meanwhile we have discovered more things need that can form without any gods :)
Aanthanur 2 months ago
@Aanthanur like I said, the deep questions won't ever be explained by science, just believe what you want, we'll see who's right.
PHELCAN 2 months ago
@dj00009 No sane person wants science to stop. People have been brainwashed especially at universities to believe that evolution and science are the same thing.No wonder 74% of graduates in US believe in evolution according to the last gallup poll.Evolutionists claim thats because the grads have been highly educated. Evolution has been perpetuated byinterpretations of scientific facts with multitudes of assumptions,and witha bias to the belief that there is no intelligent design
steventhr 3 months ago
Evolution is not even almost science.
watch?v=HoKVVYJ8KJM
JungleJargon 3 months ago
A good case for God's existence can be made - Richard Dawkins
shockofgod 4 months ago
@shockofgod Troll harder, shocky.
DrEvolutionQuest 4 months ago in playlist Evolution Is Real Science (standup4REALscience)
This has been flagged as spam show
@shockofgod
Why can't you provide any real evidence?
odinata 4 months ago
Evolution can't be trusted as fact. Since we are discovering new information daily there is no way for any human being to say " This is the way it is " . New information will always be coming in and anyone who just accepts evolution as fact doesn't respect any information that may come at a later date.
TheGreekMan1981 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheGreekMan1981
So you don't think foxes are related to wolves?
odinata 4 months ago
Evolution is so real just like the chin of Michael Jackson.
Riste1986 4 months ago
Evolution is a lie dude! I'm God the Holy Spirit! Check out my testimony!
NathanGDavis 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice video except for the fact that evolution is a THEORY, which means it is not proven and is probably false. so did some apes just stop evolving while others evolved into humans? yeah right. evolution can be disproven very easily while creation can NOT be disproven.
drite94 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Charles Darwin wasn't even a scientist by our standards today. He wasn't smart enough to study medicine (as his parents wished), had only a bachelor's degree (no Ph.D. at all) not in science but in THEOLOGY, and just happened to draw nice pictures and invent a pseudoscientific theory that has never been proven. And to think this theory is taught as fact, is shoved down children's throats, and that Darwin is worshipped as a god is ridiculous.
BachScholar 5 months ago
@BachScholar Yes, it is ridiculous to think that "[evolutionary] theory is taught as fact" or that it is "shoved down children's throats" or that "Darwin is worshipped as a god."
Good thing no rational person would believe such ridiculous things!
standup4REALscience 5 months ago 13
@standup4REALscience Evolution is not science. It is neither repeatable nor observable as required in the scientific method.
6630mcdo 2 months ago
@6630mcdo REAL scientific theories must be testable and falsifiable, and they must employ explanatory mechanisms that are observable and repeatable. As explained in my videos, the explanation of common ancestry is both testable and falsifiable. The mechanisms of evolutionary change are observable in nature and repeatable in laboratory experiments. Clearly, evolution is REAL science. It fulfills even the most restrictive definitions of science.
standup4REALscience 2 months ago
@standup4REALscience No, you are wrong. The entire process from beginning of the claimed science until the end must be repeatable. Picking a process of one billionth the time scale does NOT meant the requirement.
6630mcdo 2 months ago
@6630mcdo In scientific method, the STEPS to do the experiment need to be repeatable. This is true for evolution. If I study homologs, and I use a series of steps to deduce approximately when two homologs diverge from a common ancestral gene, those series of steps are indeed repeatable. And not all scientific studies have to be observable. This relates to the whole field of bayesian inferences + Monte Carlo simulations.
Casshyr 2 months ago
@BachScholar Charles Darwin didn't even come up with Evolution.
His grandfather Erasmus Darwin wrote two books on the subject before Charles was even born.
The idea goes back to the bronze age.
The discovery of DNA proves the impossibility of Darwinism.
Information doesn't just write itself and the proteins needed by DNA are made by RNA which needs DNA and RNA to make itself.
It's imposable without a designer.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@flyingscience2 sheesh, you creationists -_- your not a scientist ,are you ?? Evolution is accepted in the entire science community and in the whole education system , who do you think you are ?
Evolution is always argued , Still is , Well , why can't you just accept this , God created the big bang and then everything itself replicated and created life, Fine happy now ? btw only 96 % of our universe is made of the periodic table, means atoms ,Rest is just is possible to explain.
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 You haven't studied history have you?
Whole generations of people are often totally wrong.
Evolution will be laughed in the future because there is not one single piece of evidence for it that is factual yet so many people believe in it.
Please come up with one piece of evidence so I can show you it's a lie.
You want the truth, don't you?
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@flyingscience2 i know more history then you , also the world is wrong and you are right ? thats a wrong ideology , Also for a second If i deny Evolution and Big bang theory , Tell me how life arose ? tell me what hapened ? tell me who created us ? Tell me how we are created ? Tell me what is this universe and black holes ? Tell me , I want your theories on it , and theories which explain every detail of it, and of evolution , of cells, human bodies , Biology .Tell me .
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 I asked you for one piece of evidence for your ridicules theory of Darwinian evolution and you instead deflected the question.
I have studied the so called evidence for macro evolution and found fault in every bit of it.
I challenged you to support your stupid theory because I am confident that I have already seen the evidence before and have disputed it with fact and science.
I use science to dispute macro evolution.
I do not just "believe" as you do.
So where is your evidence?
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@flyingscience2 Im getting tired of Explaining it , I'll write you in a mail then , Evidences cannot be shown in a comment :D I cannot dig a dinosaur bone and show you mate , Its ridiculous XD
I'll tell you a few basic ones in a message , fine ? :D
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 You can send a private message to me if you like.
I should say that since DNA makes evolution imposable I expect to get from you 1 or more of the following, speculation, assertion, wishful thinking or lies.
These have been the backbone of Darwin's evolutionary evidence since day 1.
But have at it mate.
Macro evolution has already been proven imposable by recent genetic research.
Evolutionists will not let go of their theory but that isn't my problem.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@BachScholar Since the information in DNA can't exist without a writer then a higher power than us created life.
It's that easy.
If you don't include God in the list of creation possibilities then you are forced to except ridicules theories unsupported by fact.
It's not my problem that you won't except the possibility of God.
DNA proves the necessity of an author.
1 trillion monkeys typing on 1 trillion typewriters for 1 trillion years will never produce anything that makes sense.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@flyingscience2 1 trillion ? wrong mate , the earth's age is 4.6 billion year ,,its only 6000 years for a creationist like yourself though :D
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 I didn't say the earth was any age mate.
I just said "1 trillion monkeys typing on 1 trillion typewriters for 1 trillion years will never produce anything that makes sense."
It was calculated that a single cells worth of information would fill a 3 gigabyte hard drive.
All that information has to work together or the organism dies.
Chance and time will never produce that which was my point.
Now if typing monkeys can't produce all that information, explain how water and rocks can
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@flyingscience2 i mailed you did you get it ? you asked for evidence
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 I got it, thanks.
Let's review it here.
1) "The universal genetic code. All cells on Earth, from our white blood cells, to simple bacteria, to cells in the leaves of trees, are capable of reading any piece of DNA from any life form on Earth. This is very strong evidence for a common ancestor from which all life descended."
It is no such thing.
That's an assertion.
You need to distinguish assertions from facts.
I assert it's evidence of one single creator.
See?
Assertion.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@flyingscience2 ahahahahahaha :) Cya bye bye , you responded just like i told you would right ? ;D
djay00009 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djay00009 "ahahahahahaha :) Cya bye bye , you responded just like i told you would right ? ;D"
Excuse me?
Are you a child?
I'm proving you wrong right now and will not deal with your infantile outbursts.
If you won't listen to real science and learn to distinguish fact from fantasy then what can I do for you?
Nothing.
Your a closed minded fool.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@flyingscience2 believe whatever you want to believe , but don't ever think science should stop , It never will . The Same science which studies biology helps to get you healthcare ,Do not forget , you have internet because of science . We have evolved so far , its amazing and staggering , People can believe in religion all they want , This happened during renaissance :) If your from a developed nation , you should owe it to Science and the humans who made it possible for u live like this.
djay00009 4 months ago 3
@djay00009 2) "2. The fossil record. The fossil record shows that the simplest fossils will be found in the oldest rocks, and it can also show a smooth and gradual transition from one form of life to another."
This is a funny one.
They age the strata by the fossils found in them.
They age the fossils by the strata they are found in.
They calibrate radiometric dating systems by the expected age deduced from this circular reasoning, LOL.
Fact.
The fossil record does not line up globally.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flyingscience2 lol at your ignorance about radiometric dating.
Aanthanur 2 months ago
@djay00009 Lets continue to prove your evidence wrong djay.
#3) "3. Genetic commonalities. Human beings have approximately 96% of genes in common with chimpanzees, about 90% of genes in common with cats (source), 80% with cows (source), 75% with mice (source), and so on."
Those numbers come from Yale DNA Hybridization Study by Charles Sibley and Jon Ahlquist.
The study was exposed as fraud almost as soon as it was published in the 1980s.
Evolutionists won't let the lie go away.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@djay00009 Lets continue to prove your evidence wrong djay.
#3) "3. Genetic commonalities. Human beings have approximately 96% of genes in common with chimpanzees, about 90% of genes in common with cats (source), 80% with cows (source), 75% with mice (source), and so on."
Those numbers come from Yale DNA Hybridization Study by Charles Sibley and Jon Ahlquist.
The study was exposed as fraud almost as soon as it was published in the 1980s.
Evolutionists won't let the lie go away.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@djay00009 Lets continue to prove you wrong.
4) "as embryos, all these life forms have gill slits, tails, and specific anatomical structures involving the spine. For humans (and other non-fish) the gill slits reform into the bones of the ear and jaw at a later stage in development."
This fraud was discovered over 100 years ago.
Ernst Haeckel totally made up his evidence for this.
Think about it.
If gill slits don't form into anything related to breathing, why say they are gill slits? LOL
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@djay00009
4) "In fact, pig embryos are often dissected in biology classes because of how similar they look to human embryos. These common characteristics could only be possible if all members of the phylum Chordata descended from a common ancestor.
"It looks like" means nothing.
"It looks like" is unscientific.
How can you argue a common ancestor from that?
You can assert it but there is no argument.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@djay00009 5) "5. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Bacteria colonies can only build up a resistance to antibiotics through evolution. It is important to note that in every colony of bacteria, there are a tiny few individuals which are naturally resistant to certain antibiotics. This is because of the random nature of mutations"
So a bacteria "evolved" into a ..................bacteria!!! LOL
What you just described is called "variation".
Nothing was added to the DNA of the bacteria.
flyingscience2 4 months ago
@BachScholar no body has proved religion either...
Heinoisurehero 3 months ago
@BachScholar Is there a point embedded somewhere in your rambling? Are you upset that evolution is irrefutable? By slamming Darwin do you feel slightly better that god did not create man? :( Darwin did not have a phd in truthology from bible university, but he was accurate and correct about evolution by natural selection. BTW - A theory explains a fact. The theory of plate tectonics explains the fact that continents drift. Evolution is proven by ERVs, chromosomal fusion and the fossil record.
Johnf85 3 months ago
Evolution is a fake. If ur saying that evolution is real then ur saying Adam and Eve are apes. God is the only way
darthdan1000 5 months ago
@darthdan1000 Wrong. We're not saying Adam and Eve were apes. We're saying Adam and Eve didn't exist, and that YOU are an ape - as is everyone else.
Only, you and your ilk tend to show it much more than some of the rest of us.
SummerSeale 4 months ago
You've missed one possibility that invalidates evolution: that the chromosome fissioned from humans to apes!
kc0itf 6 months ago
@iDaBestOnline So do I
ikaninjau2 6 months ago
@ikaninjau2 So do you
ikaninjau2 6 months ago
there is no universal meaning to life, the meaning of life is what you make it. what you do with your life provides the meaning and every human being has the potential to provide meaning to their own existence. the purpose of religion has been to fill the void of what can not be expanded through science and exhibits an absolute refusal to to seek out this unexplained. we must cast asunder these puritanic ideals if we are to progress as a species.
metalgearanarchist 8 months ago
It truly amazes me how people think the most advance information storage systems in the known universe, evolved randomly over millions of years. the most advanced optical systems evolved over millions of years. not only do these systems exists on a physical level but also on an almost digital level coded within the DNA structure. lets put this thing in its rightful place, all of nature looks like it was designed by a mastermind.
RespectMyHate 8 months ago
@RespectMyHate
"all of nature looks like it was designed by a mastermind."
even you cant be that stupid!
Does a mastermind design an animal with hip sockets and even tendons to attch the legs, but forgets the legs?
Gives bones designed for flying to a flightless bird?
Gives humans the exact same mislignments in DNA that the other great apes have? LOL Making that DNA useless LOL
gorilla199uncensored 8 months ago in playlist Proof of Evolution
@gorilla199uncensored Don't worry one day you'll snap to your senses, you might just need to mature a bit more.
RespectMyHate 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RespectMyHate
"Don't worry one day you'll snap to your senses, you might just need to mature a bit more."
Interesting you couldnt deny proof of evolution, you didnt even try!
gorilla199uncensored 8 months ago
@RespectMyHate
You believe in a made up fairy tale based on no evidence over the most scientifically respected theory on how we got here because it makes you feel happy, and HE'S the one that needs to grow up?
slipperywhenwet5 7 months ago
@slipperywhenwet5 Guess what, science has linked all mans mtDNA to one woman and guess what they call her? Mitochodrial EVE, science just proved the Genesis account LOL.
RespectMyHate 7 months ago
@RespectMyHate
Look up microchodrial Eve, click the wikipedia link, scroll to "Common Fallacies". Oh, lookie!
"One of the misconceptions of mitochondrial Eve is that since all women alive today descended in a direct unbroken female line from her that she was the only woman alive at the time. However nuclear DNA studies indicate that the size of the ancient human population never dropped below some tens of thousands; there were many other women around at Eve's time with descendants alive today."
slipperywhenwet5 7 months ago
@slipperywhenwet5 WIKIPEDIA, you make yourself look real bad.
RespectMyHate 7 months ago
@RespectMyHate WIKIPEDIA, which is a accumulation of knowledge that occasionally is grieved by trolls to be stupid and very outlandish. This sentence and the sentences after that I couldn't fit into the comment (500 character limit) has a source that links to a valid scientific study on evolution.
Ill take peer reviewed scientific studies over the Bible (which is apparently true, because the Bible says so) any day.
You wanna believe we're made of magic dirt, go ahead.
slipperywhenwet5 7 months ago
@slipperywhenwet5 I can tell you've never took a biology class, because we are made of dirt. Carbon, Hydrogen, oxygen, Phosphorus, potassium, iodine, nitrogen, sulfur, calcium, and iron, along with 20 other trace amounts of other elements. If you really want to take this a step farther, you can go to home depot and buy everything it takes to build a human, I'll leave that task up to the God hating scientist though, BIBLE WINS AGAIN.
RespectMyHate 7 months ago
30 people are christian.
Superdarkpit 8 months ago
To say that evolution is real is to say that life was created at random and there is no point or purpose for living. It means that we are all basically worthless and unimportant. Sorry, I don't believe that. I think that there is a reason why I was born and my life is not purposeless.
Tam15Singer 8 months ago
@Tam15Singer Random processes produce the genetic variety that is the fount of evolutionary change. These are the very same processes that made you a genetically distinct individual. If you think evolution leads to a life without purpose, then so does meiosis and fertilization. Think about it.
standup4REALscience 8 months ago 7
@Tam15Singer Natural selection is not random. Sexual selection is not random. Is your ego so fragile that you have to believe that everything was specially made for you? Can you not see how much more it says about us that we adapted to become the dominate species on the planet by becoming smarter than the things that would kill us off? Why do you insist that your god can't use evolution as it's mechanism? Is it so important to you to have a small god?
dodgermutt 8 months ago
@Tam15Singer
Your argument is the classically based on your own ego and not science. You are effectively admitting that you CHOOSE to believe what you want to be true, regardless of whether or not it is. It is your self important ego that drives you to believe that your life is special and has a designed purpose. I think that everything in the universe is an absolute miracle, but not attributed to an invisible old man living in the sky.
booksRbad 8 months ago
@Tam15Singer "To say that evolution is real is to say that life was created at random.." Wrong. Evolution doesn't say how we were created, just what happens to already living things. I really wish people would get a proper education before spouting off nonsense, almost always religious in nature. Only a deeply religious person would have the gall, armed with less than a GED at times, to say that scientists all around the world are completely wrong.
thelordmemnoch 8 months ago
@Tam15Singer To paraphrase the great House MD:
Its not about meaning and feeling good about yourself, it's about the truth.
I WANT to believe in a heaven, a loving god, and that there is a purpose to life. I just don't, because I hate lying ,especially to myself.
Whether or not you life has purpose has nothing to do with how we got here, it's about what you want to do, and how you want to get there.
To me, living because some greater being made me to fulfill his deeds is more depressing.
slipperywhenwet5 7 months ago
@Tam15Singer First, I am a Christian that finds no problem with accepting evolution, and second, even if Christianity was wrong, we do have purpose, though perhaps a less glorious one. To carry on our DNA, to ensure our genetic code survives.
griffithomi 6 months ago
@Tam15Singer You decide the reason for your own existence.
gpalmer12345 6 months ago
@Tam15Singer There is absolutely nothing about your having evolved that means you have to live a "meaningless" or "purposeless" life.
The theory of evolution does not address how life emerged. Only how new species emerge. Scientists are still working to find out how life came about. But it's already safe to say that much of it was not random. It had to be a process governed by the properties of several basic chemicals.
LukeScientiae 5 months ago
This is a very good set of videos, nicely introducing human evolution. Congratulations to the author!
LukeScientiae 5 months ago
@LukeScientiae Thank you very much.
standup4REALscience 5 months ago
@Tam15Singer Actually, no it doesn't mean that at all. And, for what it's worth, after reading your comment...I think you're pretty useless.
SummerSeale 4 months ago
@Tam15Singer The reason you were born is because at some point, for better or worse, your father and mother decided to have sex. As a result of that, millions upon millions of sperm competed to fertilize your mother's egg, Even if you disregard evolution, for whatever pathetic reason that may be, it was simple chance that that specific sperm "won". It could have easily been a different one. And if it was, you wouldn't even be here to tell me that evolution isn't "real".
JetRanger77 4 months ago
@Tam15Singer evolution says nothing about how it all began. What you're talking about is called abiogenesis. Evolution describes everything after the fact. Also your life is not purposeless. Stop looking for an external locus of control to give you that meaning, grab life by the balls and find it for yourself.
Grizzly0679 4 months ago
Evolution only happens in the textbooks
RespectMyHate 8 months ago
@RespectMyHate
"Evolution only happens in the textbooks"
And if you're reading valid textbooks, you'd know out it happens in real life too.
nolobede 8 months ago
Wow! By the comments here our world is in real trouble. Facts and evidence just does not seem to be enough to get people to think for themselves yet. Think for yourselves people. Science has no reason or way to lie. But your preachers and clergy have every reason to continue the lie, they want your money and your votes. It continues to be the most successful fraud of all times. They feed on human fear and guilt shamelessly and promise a salvation they cannot give.
corktech 9 months ago
Someone explain this to me. If we exist at this point in time, something had to start the cycle of life. Let us just assume that you are right and evolution started it. What was before ev olution, what was before the big bang, what was before that, and what was before that, and what was before that? I mean, in order for something to exist...there has to be a cause for it to exist. SOMETHING HAD TO ALWAYS EXIST....AND IF IT WASN'T GOD...What was it? Energy? I don't think so.
TheGreekMan1981 9 months ago
@TheGreekMan1981 ok lets assume evolution is right. scientists dont have all the answers but if they got this one right(evolution). then u can make the assumption that the biblical idea of creation is wrong. now if we asume that the bible is wrong then we have to come up w/ another theory hence the big bang. its not some easy thing to prove like 2+2 =4. but they have looked far into space/ further than any one in biblical times. they can see that the universe was compact and possibly exploded.
sariglenn 9 months ago
@sariglenn My friend, evil-lution isn't fact at all. It has many holes. If you would prefer to believe that you evolved from a worm, you have every right to do so. I 100% know that I didn't evolve from anything. I am a creation of God Almighty.
Something has had to always exist. Since science itself proves that there was a start to time, we know that something has to be infinite. You go ahead and put your full faith in science. I just simply disagree.
TheGreekMan1981 9 months ago
Comment removed
sariglenn 9 months ago
@TheGreekMan1981 YOU STATED " lets assume ur right and evolution started it" . from that very comment we have to come up with another reason for the creation of the universe.and that is why we have the big bang & evolution. b/c its the best model there is. u cant take 1 idea( the bible) and say, ok its the truth we dont need to look any further. done deal there is a god...u have to look at other options. and in this information we should be able to conclude how we came to be. if by a god or not
sariglenn 9 months ago
@sariglenn I'm not angry that people accept evolution as their own personal truth ( although I disagree ). My problem is that evolution isn't as scientific as people make it out to be. I could take a weak minded person and convince them of Christianity, and a proffesor at a university could take a weak minded person and convince them evolution is fact.
The truth is, evolution isn't a fact. It cannot be proven. It is a religion. If it were fact you wouldn't have Christian Scientists
TheGreekMan1981 9 months ago
@TheGreekMan1981 Where did you learn about evolution?
splicedenergy 9 months ago
Wowowowo!..
Brad Pitt is NOT human.
DjRalfy 9 months ago
God create a first organism giving it the ability to adapt to its surroundings and eventually it came to us
TheNioxen 9 months ago
UFOTV Presents...: Forbidden Science - Shattering the Myths of darwins theory
WATCH THIS
malikidmc 9 months ago
And will monkeys we have today turn into humans?
superduperawsome16 9 months ago
U know dogs and bears are as much related as the human and the apes so did bears come from dogs?
superduperawsome16 9 months ago
@superduperawsome16 No, dogs and bears have a common ancestor.
419Films 1 month ago
Maybe, that's the way God made it. Maybe, Adam and Eve were early representations of mankind through this evolution. Maybe, they were just a fairy tale and were just man's way of explaining away how they came to be. Maybe, there is a God and He laughs when we get it right just as much as when we get it wrong.
pmoyer50 10 months ago
@pmoyer50 God is an asshole if so LOL
DjRalfy 9 months ago
@DjRalfy : You are either a person who does not believe in a God or you are a Satanist who uses foul language to address the God of the universe. One of the most evil humans I ever met used that same description of God and he was a Satanist. I feel sorry for you.
pmoyer50 9 months ago
@pmoyer50 I am nothing like a satanist. I am actually a very nice and considerate person who finds humor in religion. I am just an ordinary guy who lost faith just with the few years i've lived in this cruel world. Satanist are worth ridiculing also and I dont respect. I am sorry if I offended you with the "foul language" I used in my last comment. What I was trying to say that if there is a God who created this cruel world with cruel people.. doesnt that make him nothing but a cruel God?
DjRalfy 9 months ago
@DjRalfy : Apology accepted and I must reciprocate for assuming things. I do know what you are expressing. For me, it's not that I deny the existence of God - rather I question why He has allowed people to do what they do. If God created all then that means emotions, too. Sin had to be a factor. Did you ever play army with little plastic men when you were a kid. It's just a game. In a way, God is playing the same game and it's for real with casualties and consequences if we don't dance right.
pmoyer50 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pmoyer50 All deistic theory makes sense if you dont think about it. I recommend you type this in the youtube search bar and watch the first video that appears. >.> Re: 5 Questions for Atheists.
That kid explains everything I try to preach on the daily basis.
DjRalfy 9 months ago
lol mybad about the caps. But ya that is what u think about God... i dint kno the world was based on what u say or when God does judge yu, he will judge you on what u think. No. he wil judge u as a judge if u broke his moral law like everyone has. But if you accept Jesus Christ God will judge u as a father =) and y wouldnt you want to have God answer your prayers and be in control of your life, we all fail without him. Its ur choice to accept Jesus and have prayers answerd, idk y wouldnt??
travv444 10 months ago
Cuz its the only one science PROVES to be true. all other bibles besides the Holy Bible fail when it comes to prophecy and science. Scientist have not found one error or proved not one single thing in the Holy bible to be untrue.How can man diss prove God lol?
travv444 10 months ago
oh absolutely. Science has proven that animals appeared by devine creation 6000 years ago. oh wait...
Offthehookdude 10 months ago
REAL SCIENCE PROVES THE HOLY BIBLE TO BE TRUE. GOD KNEW PPL WERE GOING TO TRY TO PROVE IT WRONG AND THAT IS WHY HE HAD PROFITS WRITE THESE "DISCOVERIES" THAT SCIENTIST ARE JUST FINDING OUT NOW WHEN THEY COULD OF LOOKED WHAT WAS WRITTIN IN THE BIBLE THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. UNLESS YOU REPENT U WILL PERISH. UR MISSING OUT ON LIVING WITH GOD RIGHT NOW IF U DONT PERSONALLY KNOW JESUS CHRIST. IM NOT TELLIN YOU TO SERVE HIM, HE IS YOUR GOD, U CHOOSE TO SERVE HIM OR NOT. UR JUDGE IS WAITING AT THE DOOR
travv444 10 months ago
@travv444 Why just the bible true? lol who knows there is 1000 or even more religion that exist and suddenly the bible have to be the true one of all the ones....
donatshabani 10 months ago
@travv444 calm down there caps lock
Offthehookdude 10 months ago
@travv444
dear mr. CapsLock,
i find it a threat that god says "believe in my son or die." don't you? ;)
also, i think a gos would be m,ore just than to just send you to hell even if you are lets say the Gandhi of your time and save millions, but don't believe in Jesus so u get to burn in hell ;)
and lastly, science and the bible are totally different. please prove to me how adam just popped into existence. thank you ;)
XDaylon 10 months ago
evolution= real
bible= ....... crikcey noise...... vreeee.. vreeeeee
TheDatsyukian 11 months ago
My religion teacher told me that they found a rock that was like 700 million years old and they compared it to very recent ones and it was the same?
What do I make of this
boxtrap21 11 months ago
@boxtrap21 Your religion teacher is insane, that's about the best you can make of that. I can think of worse things to make of it though. Why, for example, is your religion teacher lying to you?
rozeboosje 11 months ago
Here a few quotes taken from GoodScienceForYou on his forum, try not to laugh -
-Diamond are no longer carbon, they are diamonds.
-Photosynthesis is a carbon digesting process.
-The cause of sickle cell anemia is unknown, dumb ass.
-Carbon is the only thing that makes us "carbon" based creatures
-There is no answer for the diversity of life. It just is.
-There are only two species of bacteria.
Anyone think they can learn anything from this clown?
KrokrX 11 months ago
@KrokrX I feel bad now for making fun out of the poor guy. He's clearly not playing with a full deck.
rozeboosje 11 months ago
@rozeboosje - He clearly suffers from the inherited mental problems prevalent in his family, but his outsize ego won't let him get professional help and the medications he needs, unlike other family members. Normally I'd agree it's not appropriate to make fun of those who are 'not playing with a full deck', but GSFY is such an unpleasant, dishonest and abusive individual he deserves everything he gets.
KrokrX 11 months ago
@KrokrX I can see what you mean by "unpleasant" and "abusive" alright. He treated me to some of that when I commented on his video "Final Proof of Evolution Falsified" [snicker] but in fairness it doesn't really bother me; I see it for the impotent rage that it is.
rozeboosje 11 months ago
@rozeboosje - you may like to watch a recent video by AlanCFA(v=6jTpiom836U) which deals with some of his dishonesty, vile accusations and abusive behavior, and 'imaginative' ideas about evolution(e.g. humans mated with gorillas!). GSFY has said he's preparing a series that will ''wipe out the religion of Evodelusionism from science' and that should give him a fair crack at the Golden Crocoduck he missed out on a few years ago(although he did beat Nephi that year).
KrokrX 11 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
Goto: (google it) "GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum" and read, post questions and find out what is really going on in biology.
GoodScienceForYou 11 months ago
Novel about an alternative view of evolution see video trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
That evolution has/does/will happen... is fact. cold stone, rock solid fact.
The ignorance of creationists and their frailed arguments does not change the fact of evolution.
Time to grow up, santa is a myth too.
nolobede 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nolobede Evodelusionism is a religion. Evolution: "that theory which sees inn the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language. This never has happened in DNA. Only gene loss, atavisms, general degradation of genomic expressions from the fit to the less fit for survival.
GoodScienceForYou 11 months ago
@GSFY "...Only gene loss, atavisms, general degradation of genomic expressions from the fit to the less fit for survival." So, you think that atavisms show a degradation from a more advanced individual? Humans are sometimes born with tails - not simply "at sacks" like Creationists claim, but working tails with muscle and blood supply.
Per your theory, this means that the human ancestor DID have a tail (in agreement with the theory of evolution), but that ancestor was MORE advanced than humans
AlanCFA 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nolobede What does creationism have to to with this; Evolution: "that theory which sees inn the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language. I have never seen this in evidence. It does not exist. It is an ideology only, a religious idea.
GoodScienceForYou 11 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou
Lacking the ability to evaluate evidence without a bias (religious agenda for instance) does not diminish the vastness of evidence and fact of evolution.
"I have never seen this in evidence. It does not exist"
- Blind ignorance does nothing positive for you.
nolobede 11 months ago
Principles of evolution include difference, overpopulation, competition etc., etc.
Theories of evolution include Lamarckian evolution, natural selection, neo-darwinism etc.
can someone or everyone help me get all/some of the theories and principles please.
hopkin104 1 year ago
its a THEORY
malikidmc 1 year ago
@malikidmc A scientific theory is a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.
standup4REALscience 1 year ago 15
@standup4REALscience the fossil record? there are clear gaps in the fossil record, you learn that in bio. do you know darwins occupation... he was a naturalist not an "EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGIST"(WOOOOOO). furthermore think about it why dont all the apes evolve already
malikidmc 1 year ago
@malikidmc "Think about why don't all apes evolve already." All of the ancestors of the great apes have long since been dead. The lineages split creating the great apes, with us being one of the species coming from the divergence. The ancestors of us are long dead. That is why there are still chimpanzees, because we did not come from chimpanzees. Chimps and Humans diverged from a common ancestor, that is why they are still here. Ardipithecus -- one of our famous ancestors -- is no longer here.
italbello6t9 1 year ago
@malikidmc "furthermore think about it why dont all the apes evolve already" you are the one who needs to think about this, because it the question shows you have not studied evolutionary theory, at all. It's like asking "since the united states was originally a colony of england, why is there still england?"
BillKiernan 1 year ago
@malikidmc thats like asking why were not all black or white not to be racist but different environments different variables im not trying to be racist
mopesd1 1 year ago
@malikidmc
because my fine sir. they do not need to anymore, like us. they can no longer evolve to become as smart as us because we are already this smart. in essence, they cannot fill in a space that has already been taken
XDaylon 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@standup4REALscience What evidence are you talking about? I have studied this for over 42 years, read over 21,000 papers on this and all there is is gene loss, gene expression loss, defects that cause genetic diseases, and reduced fitness.
GoodScienceForYou 11 months ago
Comment removed
KrokrX 11 months ago
GSFY - Jimmy, no-one believes you, you've never read anything like 21,000 papers, you're a failed hot-tub salesman who didn't even complete high-school, and you tell lies to try to gain the credibility you can't earn. You're so dishonest you embezzled funds from your own family, that's really low. Sadly, all those years with the Jehovah's Witnesses and Siddha Yoga cult(17yrs) must have scrambled what little intellect you were born with. Get professional help and take the medications offered.
KrokrX 11 months ago