I furnish you with the link to a video featuring testimonials by local people at the site of the area you 'debunk', people who are far more familiar with local conditions than you are ever likely to be. YOUR response?
While you are, doubtless, considering a carefully crafted reply to this last post, I point out to you that, during the Bush Administration, PAID environmental 'scientists' SKEWED their work to favorably augment the Bush agenda for pillaging the American forests. The research of one or two or a handful of scientists 'debunking' global warming is to be equally called into question, since it is just as easy for them to be bought as it is for anyone else.
Particularly in light of the fact that it is HIGHLY in the interest of industrialists and capitalists to debunk global warming, so as to maintain the security of their current profit margins without having to worry about retooling to ensure there even IS a planet on which to spend their money. It is YOU who face the uphill battle, sir...not those who have included an acknowledgment of global warming into the realm of accepted scientific study.
And it is highly in the interests of statists to promote climate catastrophism. Your dark murmurings about the tactics of opponents of climate catastrophism ring particularly hollow in the light of the fraud, exaggeration, and bullying of skeptics highlighted in the Climategate emails.
Misguided policies to "solve" the "climate crisis" have devastated more forests than any other in the last 10 years, particularly the NZ Kyoto forest massacre, and the felling of tropical rainforest to plant palm oil-subsidised the mandates for a certain % of biofuels in petrol.
Don't believe me about the Bush administration 'influencing' environmental data to allow for re-opening banned forest areas to logging? Look it up for yourself, moron...
What the hell has my geographical location got to do with it? I give a peer-reviewed reference to research which shows no warming. What is your response?
Amen, I love how the global warming people have no falsification criteria for their science. Apparently, no matter what happens, it is from global warming. If it gets hot, global warming. If it snows, global warming.
watch
"China's melting glacier"
watch?v=xE8Bm5fR_hY
Glaciers are melting in East Turkestan which is just north of Tibet.
I've also seen pictures of how much a glacier beside Everest has dropped. Its melting.
ChinaKillsTibetans 1 year ago
My response is - you cite ONE PAPER.
I furnish you with the link to a video featuring testimonials by local people at the site of the area you 'debunk', people who are far more familiar with local conditions than you are ever likely to be. YOUR response?
TheMercilessEye 2 years ago
While you are, doubtless, considering a carefully crafted reply to this last post, I point out to you that, during the Bush Administration, PAID environmental 'scientists' SKEWED their work to favorably augment the Bush agenda for pillaging the American forests. The research of one or two or a handful of scientists 'debunking' global warming is to be equally called into question, since it is just as easy for them to be bought as it is for anyone else.
TheMercilessEye 2 years ago
Particularly in light of the fact that it is HIGHLY in the interest of industrialists and capitalists to debunk global warming, so as to maintain the security of their current profit margins without having to worry about retooling to ensure there even IS a planet on which to spend their money. It is YOU who face the uphill battle, sir...not those who have included an acknowledgment of global warming into the realm of accepted scientific study.
TheMercilessEye 2 years ago
And it is highly in the interests of statists to promote climate catastrophism. Your dark murmurings about the tactics of opponents of climate catastrophism ring particularly hollow in the light of the fraud, exaggeration, and bullying of skeptics highlighted in the Climategate emails.
48hawai 2 years ago
Misguided policies to "solve" the "climate crisis" have devastated more forests than any other in the last 10 years, particularly the NZ Kyoto forest massacre, and the felling of tropical rainforest to plant palm oil-subsidised the mandates for a certain % of biofuels in petrol.
48hawai 2 years ago
Your one-sided analysis of my post is of no interest to me whatsoever, and does nothing to remove the validity of my statement. FAIL
TheMercilessEye 2 years ago
Subjective human memory is nortoriously unreliable. What old codger won't tell you how different EVERYTHING was in the past?
48hawai 2 years ago
And what young punk wouldn't tell you the same thing to make a fast buck? LOLOL....
TheMercilessEye 2 years ago
Don't believe me about the Bush administration 'influencing' environmental data to allow for re-opening banned forest areas to logging? Look it up for yourself, moron...
TheMercilessEye 2 years ago
So who do we trust...the local people, or some Kiwi git a half a world away from the scene?
watch?v=6Ut0dp6yU3M&feature=related
TheMercilessEye 2 years ago
@TheMercilessEye
What the hell has my geographical location got to do with it? I give a peer-reviewed reference to research which shows no warming. What is your response?
SteveWrathall 2 years ago
Amen, I love how the global warming people have no falsification criteria for their science. Apparently, no matter what happens, it is from global warming. If it gets hot, global warming. If it snows, global warming.
MetaMorphy 4 years ago
Similarly, in the UK they blamed the drought conditions of 2006 as well as the extra wet conditions of 2007 on global warming!
minilemur 4 years ago