@Willowz I like to be open to all religion's lessons. Hard not to notice Islam in Dune, Hinduism in Avatar, etc. Using them to inspire books, plays or movies are common and I find interesting to take notice of.
I disagree. From a pragmatist standpoint, he's not necessarily wrong in using a person's socio-economic status to determine their propensity towards crime.
@skibidido Lee J. Cobb's character was convinced of the suspect's guilt throughout the movie and while personal prejudice undoubtedly had a role in that, the final few minutes in the jury's quarters reveal other issues in his life that cause him to not have faith in a young man.
This is a complete process error, jurors aren't allowed to do independent research over the case, they are only allowed to weigh the evidence presented based on their past experiences and knowledge. Great movie, but the judge/prosecutor would be furious if they found out about this. Then again, who the hell is the public defender in this case??
@RIBASAROUS Yeah, it's a good movie, but wholly inaccurate. I mean it's so illegal, if it were in real life, this case would have been retried like that.
@RIBASAROUS this is not an accurrate film about how the legal system works, it is a superior film about consensus building and leadership. It could also be appreciated as a Christian film as each jurror symbolically repents for the sin that made him raise his hand. Ford brings men to his side and then accepts without judgment for their initial vote, one of the classic Christ figures in movies --- made clear when this man in white is revealed as Davis, which means "son of David".
@itissomeoneelse Oh, do go around and start interpreting films based on religious undertones, sir. I guess, if the boy was a Muslim or a Jew the movie might have ended differently, eh?
Each individual is different. We must look at them with open eyes.
Some people commit crimes. It's not prejudice that sends them to court; it's their actions. We have to treat each situation as the unique event that it is.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This movie is bullcrap. Fonda is a con man with an anti-death penalty agenda. He does all these mental gymnastics, like accusing witnesses of LYING, with no proof at all. He manipulates the other gullible jurors into voting not guily. It also annoys me that almost everybody who strongly believes the kid is gulity is shown to be a racist, a sadist, or an idiot.
@Leatherbubba Not at all. Our justice system is founded on the belief that someone is innocent until proven guilty BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT. Juror #8 has reasonable doubt, and, upon reexamination of the situation, the rest of the jurors find that they also have reasonable doubt that the kid did it. If you weren't sure someone was guilty, would you be OK with deciding they were going to die?
@razormusik This is the clearest statement of law observed as applied to the film and surrounding issues. A good man has a hunch that everything is not as clear as it seems, the situation would seem to point to the obvious guilt of the accused, but the single most important point is....if you have a "reasonable doubt" given the circumstances, you have a duty to consider this and keep on track with your reasoning. Probabilities may be mentioned, racism referred to...who hears what?
@Leatherbubba Everyone thought he was guilty for sure when the movie started. Including the non-racists. Everybody changed their opinions at the end of the movie. I think Lee J. Cobb's character kept thinking he was guilty not because of the facts, but because of his prejudice. At the end of the movie he changed and his humanity took over the prejudice side of him, and he honestly didnt want the boy punished. Thats my take of it.
By your argument, you assume that the directors' intention of adding the speech was to inform the audience of the ongoing prejudice. The speech provided a nice ending to the movie and acts like a summation. I also took your post less seriously when you attacked a "particular stupid audience".
Personally, I think the scene would be improved without Fonda's little addendum speech about prejudice. The prejudice is obvious - only a particularly stupid audience needs it spelled out in detail.
The acting in this movie is first rate. A powerful thoughtful movie, and I would have expected this in the climate of the '60's. That's why it shows some awareness of social things that could have, but weren't broadly addressed in the '50's.It's amazing how the characters served every segment of society, and through excellent script writing and direction came together and became humane,decent, and justifiable. A Classic movie!
I don't know. I haven't seen the 1997 version, but I can't imagine it being as impactful as this one. Even the fact that it is in colour would detract from the sense of absolute concentration on what is important here.
It's interesting to wonder how they decided, based on the juror's character and personalities, who stands up and who remains seated and in what order they stand up. I'm not sure what to make of it but some thought must have gone into it. In the 1954 TV version, they all get early on in the speech, before it would have sunk in what he was saying and why he was saying it. It's properly done here.
Watching it in my government class. I think it's the first black and white movie I'll ever be interested in and ever finish! And there's no actions in it!
12 Angry Men is as brilliant as film making and acting get. Wow, what a great movie and cast. Definately one of Henry Fonda's best. Love this move. Peace. : )
i know all about this shit i am Indian and i heard all kinds of shit come out of white ignorants peoples mouths all my life those idiots have hung innocent men women and children because of the color of skin !
i know all about this shit i am Indian and i heard all kinds of shit come out of white ignorants peoples mouths all my life those idiots have hung innocent men woemn and children because of the color of skin !
@mjstbnsn The content of fictional works will not change the reality. Go have a look at the videos in my favorites. That's a little slice of "diversity" reality in the safety of your own living room.
I love old american movies. This is one of the best, I've ever seen. It was also a big surprise, when I saw there the actor form my country Jiří (George) Voskovec.
This is an example of how the Constitution doesn't protect kids. You're guaranteed an impartial Jury, except for one thing: Juries can have men, women, blacks, white, latinos, but NO MINORS!
If you're 17 and on trial, you're not going to have any of your "peers" on the jury because 17 year olds can't serve on juries. You'll be judged by older people who are prejudiced against kids.
at that time the majority would have been racist and shared that view, so its a bit unrealistic how they all stand up and turn away, and they are all white.
Spiderman is a film for Saturday evenings, popcorn and drinking, just plain old fun-having... 12 Angry Men is a film for open minds, for thinking and thought-shaping, as well as fighting prejudice.
No, there are books for fun and books for mind-shaping, there are also movies for fun and for mind-shaping... Actually, anything that can affect mind or opinion should do so, and films are no exception. You should read a book here and there. A philosophical one.
@TheFounders Excluding that one of course...yeah i forgot about that one as i was writing that comment...I was more thinking of a Michael Bay remake staring Shia and the Pratt douche as the jurors...now THAT is scary
A long time ago my Dad used to let me watch late films on BBC2. Sunday night. Next day school. I asked if I could watch the film one night and it was 12 Angry Men. His reply: Watch this one son. You might learn something. Great advice and a great film. Should be shown in schools around the world.
Rush Limbaugh on jury duty.
TheLastOfTheFinest80 6 days ago
@TheLastOfTheFinest80 Exactly what I was thinking!
flyerflyer123123 5 days ago
Why was juror 4 already standing up?
Rasbiff 1 week ago
This movie is awesome. I'm So excited to play Juror #10 in the spring play!!!
Riderkick79 1 week ago
@Willowz I like to be open to all religion's lessons. Hard not to notice Islam in Dune, Hinduism in Avatar, etc. Using them to inspire books, plays or movies are common and I find interesting to take notice of.
itissomeoneelse 2 weeks ago
We need to Open our Mind and open our Heart and behumanbekind
OMHlogo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Law is not for punishing the guilt,But not to punish the innocent.The perfect example.So 100% prove is needed.
07sanjeewakaru 1 month ago
Comment removed
07sanjeewakaru 1 month ago
Very good acting.
MySilverr 1 month ago
I disagree. From a pragmatist standpoint, he's not necessarily wrong in using a person's socio-economic status to determine their propensity towards crime.
hedonism13 2 months ago
@hedonism13 I would argue that it is. Statistics are only proof of a general trend and should not be applied to individual cases.
But either way that's missing the point, it wasn't about socio-economic status, it was about race.
ladders1 4 days ago
Juror no.8 is badass
MrTimmyCahill 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Listen to me. Listen to me"
"I have. Now sit down and don't open your mouth again"
ShipwreckedRory 2 months ago
good job you people, i wish i could do that on a mexican court trial
conasol1 2 months ago
@skibidido Lee J. Cobb's character was convinced of the suspect's guilt throughout the movie and while personal prejudice undoubtedly had a role in that, the final few minutes in the jury's quarters reveal other issues in his life that cause him to not have faith in a young man.
MToshiro5575 2 months ago
This is a complete process error, jurors aren't allowed to do independent research over the case, they are only allowed to weigh the evidence presented based on their past experiences and knowledge. Great movie, but the judge/prosecutor would be furious if they found out about this. Then again, who the hell is the public defender in this case??
RIBASAROUS 3 months ago
@RIBASAROUS Yeah, it's a good movie, but wholly inaccurate. I mean it's so illegal, if it were in real life, this case would have been retried like that.
colinmcom14 3 months ago
@RIBASAROUS this is not an accurrate film about how the legal system works, it is a superior film about consensus building and leadership. It could also be appreciated as a Christian film as each jurror symbolically repents for the sin that made him raise his hand. Ford brings men to his side and then accepts without judgment for their initial vote, one of the classic Christ figures in movies --- made clear when this man in white is revealed as Davis, which means "son of David".
itissomeoneelse 1 month ago
@itissomeoneelse Oh, do go around and start interpreting films based on religious undertones, sir. I guess, if the boy was a Muslim or a Jew the movie might have ended differently, eh?
VVillowz 2 weeks ago
12 Angry Men is much better than The Godfather is
92af 3 months ago 11
What a great movie! #8 was not expressing reasonable doubt. He was expressing racism, that all Hispanics are guilty.
CHADOW66 4 months ago 2
@CHADOW66 Unless I'm mistaken, I think that he was talking about poor people in general, not Hispanics.
donteffwitme 3 months ago
@CHADOW66 you mean #9? #8 is the main character in the play who is on the non-guilty side. He is not prejudiced
thewanted1fan 6 days ago
First he said theres a few good apples and moments later he then said : theres not one of them thats any good. In the same minute.
sucharadder 4 months ago 2
Prejudice is one thing. Truth is another.
Each individual is different. We must look at them with open eyes.
Some people commit crimes. It's not prejudice that sends them to court; it's their actions. We have to treat each situation as the unique event that it is.
eastariel 4 months ago 4
This is what you call Jury Nullification and I would always demand a Jury over a judge any day of the week.
bxlxix69 4 months ago
who's the orginal teabagger
danirey02 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wupload.com/file/262284729 this is link for movie download, click on slow download and wait few minutes to download a movie...
roflmaogirlful 5 months ago
I love this movie.....and this is the perfect way to deal with prejudice
MsJedibitch 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@leatherbubba... you got some serious issues with this film. May be you wasnt loved as a child.
Andrew4511 5 months ago
leatherbubba... you got some serious issues with this film. May be you wasnt loved as a child.
Andrew4511 5 months ago
Awesome movie
Nkieffer000 5 months ago
the one was better then the remake
PureTamil 5 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
I love this movie.
eastariel 5 months ago
In removing toxic prejudice from our world, it helps to remove it from ourselves first.
eastariel 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This movie is bullcrap. Fonda is a con man with an anti-death penalty agenda. He does all these mental gymnastics, like accusing witnesses of LYING, with no proof at all. He manipulates the other gullible jurors into voting not guily. It also annoys me that almost everybody who strongly believes the kid is gulity is shown to be a racist, a sadist, or an idiot.
Leatherbubba 6 months ago
@Leatherbubba Not at all. Our justice system is founded on the belief that someone is innocent until proven guilty BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT. Juror #8 has reasonable doubt, and, upon reexamination of the situation, the rest of the jurors find that they also have reasonable doubt that the kid did it. If you weren't sure someone was guilty, would you be OK with deciding they were going to die?
razormusik 5 months ago 27
@razormusik This is the clearest statement of law observed as applied to the film and surrounding issues. A good man has a hunch that everything is not as clear as it seems, the situation would seem to point to the obvious guilt of the accused, but the single most important point is....if you have a "reasonable doubt" given the circumstances, you have a duty to consider this and keep on track with your reasoning. Probabilities may be mentioned, racism referred to...who hears what?
JackofAllTakes 4 months ago
@Leatherbubba Everyone thought he was guilty for sure when the movie started. Including the non-racists. Everybody changed their opinions at the end of the movie. I think Lee J. Cobb's character kept thinking he was guilty not because of the facts, but because of his prejudice. At the end of the movie he changed and his humanity took over the prejudice side of him, and he honestly didnt want the boy punished. Thats my take of it.
skibidido 4 months ago
I love this scene and I love this movie
JaqDanical 6 months ago
We just read this play in 10th grade english today
Stroker6L 6 months ago
By your argument, you assume that the directors' intention of adding the speech was to inform the audience of the ongoing prejudice. The speech provided a nice ending to the movie and acts like a summation. I also took your post less seriously when you attacked a "particular stupid audience".
exbrawler 6 months ago
Personally, I think the scene would be improved without Fonda's little addendum speech about prejudice. The prejudice is obvious - only a particularly stupid audience needs it spelled out in detail.
Bryan514 6 months ago
3 minute and 20 second single shot. Would of been very very difficult, I wonder how many takes they did.
bergerlemur 6 months ago
I remember acting in this play in my 8th grade reading class. i was jurer number eight.
ligetle15 7 months ago
There are quite a few liberals out there who could learn some thing from this
BigAl9432 7 months ago
The acting in this movie is first rate. A powerful thoughtful movie, and I would have expected this in the climate of the '60's. That's why it shows some awareness of social things that could have, but weren't broadly addressed in the '50's.It's amazing how the characters served every segment of society, and through excellent script writing and direction came together and became humane,decent, and justifiable. A Classic movie!
pbrucpaul 7 months ago 7
why dislike
i guess sarah palin made 13 accounts
nfsrf 7 months ago
Quality clip. I'm on jury service at the moment and what he says about being sure and outside prejudices is spot on. Great film. Great clip. Thanks
pompeypirate 7 months ago 9
My favorite role in a play ever": Juror 3. This is one of my favorite movies and I was lucky enough to be in the play.
SuspenseSmith 7 months ago
In extremely tense and stressful situations a person's true nature reveals itself.
HAsaxophone42 8 months ago
@HAsaxophone42 Yeah.
ARP7777777 7 months ago
I don't know. I haven't seen the 1997 version, but I can't imagine it being as impactful as this one. Even the fact that it is in colour would detract from the sense of absolute concentration on what is important here.
quitejaded 8 months ago
Comment removed
Muarkuss 8 months ago
RIP Sidney Lumet
This film made me appreciate the art of filmmaking.
maxpowers518 8 months ago
Juror #4 was a terrific character in this movie.
Dyluck387 8 months ago
EXCELLENT movie. If only every court case in the US had Henry Fonda's character in the jury.
Ringo84 9 months ago 16
It's interesting to wonder how they decided, based on the juror's character and personalities, who stands up and who remains seated and in what order they stand up. I'm not sure what to make of it but some thought must have gone into it. In the 1954 TV version, they all get early on in the speech, before it would have sunk in what he was saying and why he was saying it. It's properly done here.
44032 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SIMPLY'`'COPY`'`&';,PASTE',`
ＷＷＷ.ＮＥＷＭＯＶＩＥＳＮＯＷ.ＴＫ
SIMPLY;,;COPY''`&,::PASTE,''
DannyPrattab 9 months ago
OWND.
AtticWarrior1994 9 months ago
they should've renamed it "THOSE GUISE MAD LOL"
FiliPinoy95 9 months ago
which one says "i have, now sit down and dont open your mouth again"?
TheHiredAgent 9 months ago
@TheHiredAgent Probably juror no. 4
Gigatrio 9 months ago
@TheHiredAgent Juror #4. The one on the left that's still sitting down.
scraps992 9 months ago
@TheHiredAgent Juror 4
delvin726 8 months ago
Watching it in my government class. I think it's the first black and white movie I'll ever be interested in and ever finish! And there's no actions in it!
OGCrispy 10 months ago
I hope I end up in a film class that watches this movie. I would have so much to say about it.
HeroOfLegend115 10 months ago
@HeroOfLegend115 We just watched it in my Civics and Economics class.
ha
emsway7 10 months ago
Begley sure hit it out of the park in the scene.
curlybobz 10 months ago
12 Angry Men is as brilliant as film making and acting get. Wow, what a great movie and cast. Definately one of Henry Fonda's best. Love this move. Peace. : )
MusicEd1 10 months ago
I just watched this in my English class, it was pretty good actually.
KaminaTheSpiralKing 11 months ago
@KaminaTheSpiralKing Woah! Dude same here! I saw this movie in my English class. We just about finished it today! I love this book/ movie so much!
DX4LIFFE 11 months ago
i know all about this shit i am Indian and i heard all kinds of shit come out of white ignorants peoples mouths all my life those idiots have hung innocent men women and children because of the color of skin !
nohealthcare62 11 months ago
i know all about this shit i am Indian and i heard all kinds of shit come out of white ignorants peoples mouths all my life those idiots have hung innocent men woemn and children because of the color of skin !
nohealthcare62 11 months ago
The original Teabagger.
AtlasShruggery 11 months ago 46
@AtlasShruggery Dumbest comment ever.
cpgrad07 4 months ago
Sidney Lumet,one of the great film directors (1924-2011).
JFBridge 11 months ago
Diversity is crap. Plain and simple. Don't believe me, go live in Detroit for the summer.
booncollection 11 months ago
@booncollection Hey stupid, perhaps you should go to Netflix and rent this movie, maybe it will open your mind
Reading stuff other than Mein Kampf or the Turner Diaries helps also(Try Mark Twain)
mjstbnsn 11 months ago
@mjstbnsn The content of fictional works will not change the reality. Go have a look at the videos in my favorites. That's a little slice of "diversity" reality in the safety of your own living room.
booncollection 11 months ago
@booncollection Like white people have never fought like that before? White people invented the atomic bomb.
antisadism 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@booncollection "Diversity is crap. Plain and simple. Don't believe me, go live in Detroit for the summer"
or you can spend the summer in Manhatten or Atlanta or San Francisco or Miami or LA or ...
You blame Detroit's problems on diversity?
You are a real racist dope.
goldhammerislame 11 months ago
Comment removed
BXCALI 11 months ago
@booncollection
You're crap. Now shut up and don't open your mouth again!
BXCALI 11 months ago
@BXCALI lol good come back bro
booncollection 10 months ago
What's going on with 11 people disliking this clip? Are they making a stand for prejudice?
gmacpurifier 11 months ago
@gmacpurifier Clearly, they were just looking for that 12th angry man.
doktorzoom 11 months ago
R.I.P
thalesdotnet 11 months ago
R.I.P. Sidney Lumet,
Ed Begley deserves huge credit for this scene!
garethmurtagh 11 months ago
one of my favorite movies. When i heard of Sidney's passing i thought of this scene
TomCollinsgirl 11 months ago
The name of Sidney Lumet will stand forever in the history of cinema as one of our greatest directors. Thank you, Sidney Lumet, for your genius.
haggisscouse 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He was one of the greats. R.I.P. Mr. Lumet.
charlesbrown02 11 months ago
He was one of the greats.
charlesbrown02 11 months ago
One of my favorite films. God bless Mr. Lumet's soul.
PrettyFrocks 11 months ago
RIP man...
momentlondon2 11 months ago
RIP lumet
joaoclima09 11 months ago
R.I.P. Sidney Lumet
KingKongMovie1 11 months ago
R.I.P. Sidney Lumet
AMember2 11 months ago 55
@AMember2 He's dead? When did this happen? He was still alive last time I checked . . .
MrHansBeckert 9 months ago
"This is how you deal with prejudice. "
And Trolls...
megaman8dvg 11 months ago 6
Interestingly enough, 10 is a Malcolm Expy in the 1997 movie.
deepshockonYT 11 months ago
This is my favorite movie
0j011 11 months ago
lololol
MsHateracists 11 months ago
Jury member #4 is my favorite.
GripTightThin 11 months ago
Lulz I'm playing juror ten for my school play. I like this guys job tho
superballsification 11 months ago
wats this movie about? seems interesting, did they make a re-make?
kezzkezzkezz3 11 months ago
he's confusing his jew, gook and nigger sterytypes...but the kid was WHITE!
unassumption 1 year ago
@unassumption the kid is supposed to be latino.
misterbizzones 11 months ago
How did this guy get jury duty? He spouts racism every time he opens his mouth. lol.
Didymosrules 1 year ago
@Didymosrules
This film was made in 1957.
HumanMonolith 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Now sit down and don't open your mouth again."
MisterX731 1 year ago
"Now sit down and don't open your mouth again."
MisterX731 1 year ago
Greatest movie ever made.
jarjarbanks22 1 year ago
I love old american movies. This is one of the best, I've ever seen. It was also a big surprise, when I saw there the actor form my country Jiří (George) Voskovec.
Ondrus21 1 year ago
I am 18 and this is one of my favorite movies ever.
warren4570 1 year ago
did people in the 50's really behave and talk like that? please a senior citizen answer
jbeatles99 1 year ago
Check out the video 'Paper, Plastic, or Murder".
TheMoochmasta 1 year ago
The remake is a sin. This is the real version
SteelandSouls15 1 year ago
This is an example of how the Constitution doesn't protect kids. You're guaranteed an impartial Jury, except for one thing: Juries can have men, women, blacks, white, latinos, but NO MINORS!
If you're 17 and on trial, you're not going to have any of your "peers" on the jury because 17 year olds can't serve on juries. You'll be judged by older people who are prejudiced against kids.
MondoBeno 1 year ago
at that time the majority would have been racist and shared that view, so its a bit unrealistic how they all stand up and turn away, and they are all white.
innit27 1 year ago
@innit27 this film represents an ideal..also in 1957 i think blacks prob would have still been segregated, though im not sure.
milosbez 1 year ago
@milosbez my ideal film would be carry on shagging
innit27 1 year ago
@innit27 loool you just made me realise what a hilarious name 12 angry men would be for a porno
milosbez 1 year ago
@milosbez i thought it was a porno. 12 sweating men trapped in a room faced with a big dilemma..who do we fuck first.
innit27 1 year ago
@innit27 Lol :-D
Actually this is a porn. This is a porn for people, who like brilliant drama as well as I do.
Ondrus21 1 year ago
This is what people should be doing to the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck. But these days they get multi-million dollar contracts.
profnachos 1 year ago
ya know what I mean?
xADRENALINE1500x 1 year ago
I'm on a jury right now for murder and I am basically Henry Fonda right now ... it's not easy but i'm sticking to my beliefs
Leezer1340 1 year ago
I have jury duty in 2 weeks
kotraquin 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THANK YOU GOD FOR LETTING ME BE BORN IN 1980 SO I THAT I DONT HAVE TO WATCH THIS KIND OF MOVIES!!
HRVATZD 1 year ago
@HRVATZD Do you prefer "Spiderman" then? I bet you do. ;p
"12 Angry Men" is just a legend of a movie. End of.
EmpiresEagle 1 year ago
@EmpiresEagle
yes of course....spiderman is a modern classic
HRVATZD 1 year ago
@HRVATZD
Spiderman is a film for Saturday evenings, popcorn and drinking, just plain old fun-having... 12 Angry Men is a film for open minds, for thinking and thought-shaping, as well as fighting prejudice.
blackwater009 1 year ago
@blackwater009
movies are supossed to be for fun not for thought-shaping ....thats what books are for...
HRVATZD 1 year ago
@HRVATZD
No, there are books for fun and books for mind-shaping, there are also movies for fun and for mind-shaping... Actually, anything that can affect mind or opinion should do so, and films are no exception. You should read a book here and there. A philosophical one.
blackwater009 1 year ago
@blackwater009
No tnx....I have a life...
HRVATZD 1 year ago
@HRVATZD
If you did, we wouldn't be having this argument, would we?
blackwater009 1 year ago
@blackwater009
ha ha ha...I have a life and I feel sorry for you....but this was funny!
HRVATZD 1 year ago
@HRVATZD
Budalo, da imaš život, pomislio bi: 'Ovo neki majmun', i ne bi se potrudio ni da mi otpišeš.
blackwater009 1 year ago
@blackwater009
HAhahah svima otpišem ali tebi mi je najdraže..luzeru...hahahhahhaa
HRVATZD 1 year ago
@HRVATZD
Svaka čast, baš si mi spustio, ko trogodišnjak.
blackwater009 1 year ago
@blackwater009
hvala, hvala..
HRVATZD 1 year ago
@HRVATZD
A što bi to trebalo značit? Povlačiš za jezik samo ili ti se stvarno ne sviđa film? Odgledaj cijeli, pa onda donosi sud.
blackwater009 1 year ago
10 viewers are fascists
mikeshanklin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
10 people are Fascists...
mikeshanklin 1 year ago
Comment removed
mikeshanklin 1 year ago
i had to watch this in my group dynamics class in college i love this movie the remake sucks though.
AmericanBulldog18 1 year ago
AMAZING MOVIE
Nilo719 1 year ago
MAZING MOVIE
Nilo719 1 year ago
What a fucking awesome film this is.
TheSpiritOfTheTimes 1 year ago
If we had a lot more like Henry Fonda coming in from the left, and Jimmy Stewart coming in from the right the world would be in safer hands..
Davis: No jury can declare a man guilty unless it's sure, we nine can't understand how you three are still so sure.
Smith: I wouldn't give two cents for all your fancy rules if, behind them, they didn't have a little bit of plain everyday kindness
Instead we have Glenn Beck and Rosie O'Donnell... Damn
krevno 1 year ago 20
@krevno Outstanding assessment.
MrFrankfromPA 1 year ago
@krevno yes. That is certainly true.
ARP7777777 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
slinkycode
sexykatie90 1 year ago
Red Buttons, Henry Fonda, and Humphrey Bogart. Epic.
reubenavery 1 year ago
The final scene where the juror rips his son's photo is the first time I've ever cried watching a movie.
woodenscissors 1 year ago
@TheFounders Excluding that one of course...yeah i forgot about that one as i was writing that comment...I was more thinking of a Michael Bay remake staring Shia and the Pratt douche as the jurors...now THAT is scary
JohnnyBRad 1 year ago
If this was ever remade, I would disown Hollywood...seriously, it just should NEVER be done
JohnnyBRad 1 year ago
Know what I mean?? love that phrase
morgantown1 1 year ago
One of THE BEST long takes ever :)
MrJDazz1230 1 year ago 4
Great part
kmed88714 1 year ago
this movie is shown in IIM Ahmedabad every year as part of there leadership training.
people, you can learn alot from this movie.
a must watch.
amitgulatiful 1 year ago
screw 12 angry jurors remake! they can suck the huge dick of this movie. It's the best!
SteelandSouls15 1 year ago
to quiet someone doesn't make prejudice go away. reasoning and discussing does
phille22 1 year ago
now sit down and dont open your mouth again.that goes to all the racists.
yassigole 1 year ago 3
only reasoning can kill prejudice ...reasoning from the listener's side...
vyomtatva 1 year ago
amazing film. shows that you don't need all kinds of special effects and stuff. all you need is a great story and great actors. simple yet elegant.
footballjava32 1 year ago 2
A long time ago my Dad used to let me watch late films on BBC2. Sunday night. Next day school. I asked if I could watch the film one night and it was 12 Angry Men. His reply: Watch this one son. You might learn something. Great advice and a great film. Should be shown in schools around the world.
Spraycando 1 year ago 4
Everybody in the world should do this to Glenn Beck.
Solar2 1 year ago 33
@Solar2 Jesus! I'm conservative and I think the guy is wacky at times, but do we have to bring up freaking politics into every god damn subject?
TideatMileHigh 11 months ago
@TideatMileHigh this subject is politics. . . Bringing in modern day talkshow personalities isnt off topic.
syphilisMan 11 months ago
HI MS DELANEY!!!! :)
wooshc 1 year ago