Re: Re: Causality and Scientific Philosophy

[Rybot9000]

I know what non-existence is like. I was non-existent once, it's beautiful!

[ripperarn]

Hmm it sounds like the language has become in exact to what you are defining the words you are using could mean one thing to someone and another to someone else.This is why philosophy to me is too basic or can lead to generality.

[burnvictim77]

It's not as exact as pictures of half naked ladies, that's for sure.

[ripperarn]

What the hell is that supposed to mean anyway did you just pull that remark from your awkward inappropriate to the discussion vulgarity bin? Besides the inexact language, you couldn't think of one coherent comment to make towards this guy here other than comments like the above or just things that you didn't have the background for and it seemed like this entire blog just turned into an argument where you guys just call each other names in a half coherent manner.

[listeningriffin]

i thought u were gonna kiss the cam at the end =)

[tejayce]

my take on the reason to think there is no soul: actions assigned to be products of a soul can be explained with neural processes .. it gets extremly complex so that it cant be overviewed completly yet .. but its there. soul can be defined as the neural arousal "flowing" inside us. the soul is defined by which and how cells are connected.

[OPT42]

god is very self-conscious.

[Huesos138]

The reason you should not assume that is because you have no idea of knowing it. It is just wishful thinking.

[bigdaddydylan]

What do you have an idea of knowing?

[Huesos138]

No *way of knowing it is what I meant to say, sorry about that.

[bigdaddydylan]

Yes, Huesos, I am clear on what you meant to say. However, while you have negated the possibility of knowing of a thing, you have not provided anything that can be known. I am left curious with what it means to know of a thing for you and what it is that you would say can be known.