Added: 5 years ago
From: jnthnwllr
Views: 784,606
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,522)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It would seem that someone in the buildings would have noticed though.

  • This is probably the most convincing of all the ufo vids. Very difficult to pull off a fake this convincing.

  • This is not fake you fucking retards. Can`t you see the fucking world trade center? This was before 9/11 bitches. As far as i know there was no such thing to edit something like that.

  • I heard about this, and apparently it was on the 8 o clock news in the morning, but by 10 o clock it was removed from the tv channels...

  • >:D... alien pilots @:21

  • Fake.we all know about editing

  • @mrcee212

    and we all know about spy planes

  • this is not fake , this is real

  • If all you fakers want to create another video then id be happy to watch.This apparently is the best fake ever.If im wrong and its fake then very well done to the idots that made it.

  • Fake my asse.This is real.in my opinion this is unfakeable.The technology involved to make this fake hasnt even been thought of yet,.Keep watching the skys people.Its just to good to be a fake..But all the idiots will be out soon to say fake as you like because they are empty headed retards that dont believe in nothing but themselves.

  • May be it's edited or not you know eyes can lie.....

  • fake as my grandparents' teeth

  • all they did was make something else look like a UFO

  • 0:21 the best

  • dude my aunt told me this and that girl is here friend i was like shit that colse of a ufo XO

  • oh well the red scar is not a big deal haha! It is the fran on the forhead.. the problem is solved now. But the missle comes out of the building for sure.

  • I saw this video years ago ,and here I am looking at it again. If you stop the video at 0.11 you will notice a big red scar on her forhead!!! what is that scar! wiered. Anyways this thing or missle comes out of world trade center and hits something in the sky.

  • I'm not sure if this was real or a commercial or whatever, but I kid you not I SAW THIS EXACT SAME THING a few years ago, it was just hovering over the parkway like you see on this video here and then it just flew away just the same way. I couldnt beleive it, theres nothing on this earth that can move that fast

  • this is not real. its was a commercial for the scifi channel.

  • Tech exists to solve all our energy and pollution problems and travel much faster than light between star systems. And it is very simple.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Do explain sir, what kind of "tech" can solve this and since it's so simple go into detail about how it works.

  • @24158010063574 Electrogravitics. Search on Youtube Search Engine

  • @Beamshipcaptain It's only a hypothesis, and has no evidence of working. And it doesn't really solve and type of energy crisis. You sir, are retarded.

  • @24158010063574 They work. I have built them. Check out my ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS, on YouTube. THis is free energy, and antigravity (artificial gravity).

  • @Beamshipcaptain The Biefeld-Brown Effcet. THe Searl Effect. The Kontrabaric Effect of Burkhard Heim, Marcel Pages, Petit Viton, etc.

  •  and how you now it? there`s too many people say the same but ..... leandro. Argentina.

  • @MrLeandrob777 My gut tells me. And the motion is exactly the same and the appearance, of UFOs that I have observed myself, with my Mom in New York, and with my girlfriend here in Pennsylvania. Are we alone in the universe? I think not. Are there techniques that are clean and non-fuel-burning and non-polluting that can allow travel between star systems? I think so. But do not look to the government or the military for your answers. Look within. You already know the answers.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Fuck You.

  • @skeebert Such hostility. Most unbecoming.

  • is this real ?

  • fake,, firstly she points at the ufo, while holding a camera, she does not take a single shot of the UFO with the camera, and also the UFO flies right up through the rotar blades of the helicoper... meaning if this happened the helicoper would be plummeting to the ground........... if these people are going to make a fake make it realisitic..

  • @bobbla1

    "does not take a single shot of the UFO"

    She's still trying to figure out what it is. The F in UFO hadn't happened yet. It was just a stationary bump sticking out on the tower at that point.

    It is flying thousands of miles an hour, fast enough to go between the rotor blades.

  • @bobbla1 so also has blood on her forehead

  • SO REAL!

  • FAKE !!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @CapFranz

    "I am not a Conspiracy Theorist"

    So 9/11 was done by one person acting alone? Or it was just a series of accidents, with not even one intentional perpetrator? Tell us more.

  • @CapFranz "not interested in WTC camouflaged Ufo's" There is none so blind as he who will not see. "PAREIDIOLIA" Not a word! To show that DOZENS of S11 ufos are just MISPERCEPTION, you need to show the SAME EFFECTS in NON-9/11 vids. Effects like rapid toggling btwn dark black and bright white jiggling shape droplet-like trails "shadows" of WHITE light cast TOWARD the sun giant 100mph bird-shaped shadows cast onto the open sky S11's 1st ufo: tinyurl com/flashframe
  • "Now that's what I cal a close encounter!"

  • Real. Notice the saucer between the twin towers at 0:11 when she turns around, then she ntices it immediately when it starts to emerge from behind the North tower. Either time travelers, or aliens. UFOs are commonplace in Manhattan, especially in the years prior to 911.

  • i think if it was real she wouldve been like "AHHH or WOAAAHH" when that thing shot out rather than all calmly saying "it'sover there"

  • @bkbnc1

    'calmly saying "it'sover there" '

    Calmly? I would say she blurts it out with a definite tone of surprise.

    Then if you listen close, the pilot says, "Oh, wow." (Would you have us think the pilot was an actor, to be given scripted lines?)

    After it flies by them, she gasps aloud.

    A version where you can use the arrow keys to examine it frame by frame is

    tinyurl com/scifichannelufoquicktime

    

  • FAKE!!!!!

  • Bullshit, Bullshit, BULLSHIT! That cameraman seemed to have such viewing accuracy and why would he zoom out @0:22?

  • @deathmetalshredify

    "That cameraman seemed to have such viewing accuracy"

    He zoomed in on the spot she was pointing at. Simply following her direction.

    "why would he zoom out @0.22?"

    By that time he had seen how fast it could move. He didn't want to lose it again like he did when he zoomed in the first time.

    Many WTC ufo's were filmed on 9/11. IMO the attacks were an inside job and the ufo's are exotic US military objects. The vid here caught something like a dress rehearsal.

  • @naudetsleuth So you believe that the bad acting in this is real? I'll believe some ufo videos are real, but this one! I'm not that gullible. There is no real proof that any footage on youtube is Authentic and there never will be any proof... btw if the "ufo" would swipe past the copter with that force, I think the fucking helicopter would of at least tipped a little.

  • @deathmetalshredify

    So you believe that helicopter pilots do acting on the side? The copter did tip away in reaction to the swiping past.

    Do you think these WTC ufo's are all fake too?

    tinyurl com/flashframe

    tinyurl com/truckwhatzit

    tinyurl com/canaleorbpair

    webfairy org/newwhatzits

    webfairy org/thing

    webfairy org/canale

  • @naudetsleuth Retard, I don't care if you believe in this and I don't like it when your being a fucking creep!

    Let me tell you something, when it comes to a phenomenon such as UFO's you get people that purposely make fake youtube videos that can be called as 97% fake, the other 3% is real! I am not a "non-believer" as you'd state me, I'm just not as gullible as you! Btw all of your so called "proof" was inconclusive since it was so pixelated, did you ever come to the conclusion?

  • @deathmetalshredify

    You yell and call names and speak of general 97% probabilities because you have no argument based on the evidence. Your only attempt was to say the helicopter did not tip, but you don't even stand by that anymore.

  • @deathmetalshredify

    "all of your so called "proof" was inconclusive since it was so pixelated"

    My so called proof? It was a question, not a proof. Doesn't the fact that many WTC ufo's appear in 9/11 footage put the SyFy vid in a new light which you have not addressed?

    Crying "pixelated" is baloney. Pixelated artifacts are random bits of video noise. The clips I linked to consistently show unusual flying objects persisting for dozens of consecutive frames in smooth paths of motion.

  • @naudetsleuth and btw this came from a fellow youtuber called GlowWorm1962 who actually made a rational comment compared to all of yours...

    "This is a promo video, filmed for the Sci-Fi channel in 2000"

    "The woman is an actress called Barbara Sicuranza; if you look at her IMDb profile you'll see it's her."

    Now please stop trying to convince me that this has a chance of being real, 97% fake, 3% real.

    Get the picture?

  • @deathmetalshredify Just because she's an actress doesn't mean she can't witness a ufo. Anyway, she CHANGED HER STORY. The resume didn't appear until June 2002: tinyurl com/sicuranzaresume Before that, three different attributions to her called it real: original SyFy cover letter tinyurl com/sfcufoletter SyFy forum tinyurl com/sicuranza her own website in Nov.2001, BEFORE someone got to her. "HISTORICAL DOCUMENT," she called the vid. tinyurl com/sicuranzahistoricaldocumen­t
  • @naudetsleuth That they are news choppers?

  • @deathmetalshredify

    "That they are news choppers?"

    I think you mean

    tinyurl com/canaleorbpair

    tinyurl com/canaleorbpair2

    But news choppers do not fly in pair formation. Nor directly into zero-visibility dust & smoke. & choppers don't change shape like jiggling raindrops on a window. Nor emit bright white pulsing light from their entire bodies. Nor leave trails.

    In version 2 (larger) there is a bright white flashing in sync with them on the river surface.

  • @naudetsleuth There is an explanation for all of that, there could have been several news choppers recording the damage of the World Trade Centre, as for the bright lights, helicopters are metallic objects too so theycan reflect things as well and the raindrops thing is just terrible quality video with a low resolution, It's a copy of a video from youtube that came from the year 2001 man... Don't act like you have incontravertible evidence of there being UFO's at the 9/11 attacks.

  • @deathmetalshredify

    You attempted only two points in arguing that the SyFy vid is fake. I countered them both.

    You said the chopper did not react to the flyby. I countered that it tilts left.

    You said the woman is an actress who says it was a paid job. I countered that even actresses can see ufo's, and she changed her story. She said in 3 different places it was real before she ever said it was fake. I cited my sources.

    Do you have anything more to say about the SyFy vid?

  • @deathmetalshredify

    I made two points you didn't try to explain. Choppers don't leave trails. Choppers don''t cause a spot on the river surface to appear & emit bright white blinking light

    Here's a new point. Observe the very high-up entrance (& sharp turn). Was this "news team" from the stratosphere?? NYC is filled with news teams. Why wouldn't such "news helicopters" come from somewhere in the city?

    tinyurl com/canaleorbpair & canaleorbpair2

  • @naudetsleuth Are you a girl or something, can you not get over it? I'll just say this, if you reply again I'm just gonna ignore you, theres no evidence suggesting that I'm right or your right. Leave it at that...

  • @deathmetalshredify

    "can you not get over it?"

    I enjoy discussing the evidence. If you have a problem with that, you should not have asked me about my opinion.

    "theres no evidence suggesting that I'm right"

    Your side makes a valid point that the woman lists it as an acting job on her resume. But when I dug into it I discovered she didn't start saying that until 2002. Multiple attributions in her name in 2000 and 2001 say it is authentic video.

  • @deathmetalshredify

    "Don't act like you have incontravertible evidence of UFO's at 9/11 attacks"

    There are DOZENS of vids of unusual flying objects in NYC that day. You have WEAKLY addressed SOME of the aspects of ONE of those films. I don't say they're ET, just very high tech.

    Here might be the best example.

    tinyurl com/truckwhatzit

    Click 1st box for slow mo excerpt.

    Put frame numbers in 2nd box for full sequence.

    Full speed version from 0.25.31 - 36 at

    tinyurl com/naudetcomplete

  • @naudetsleuth WHY DON'T YOU FUCK OFF, I'M FUCKING BLOCKING YOU,

    YOU JUST CAN'T LEARN TO SHUT THE FUCK UP !!!!!

    YOU'VE GOTTA HAVE IT YOUR WAY DON'T YA,

    DOES IT HURT TO KNOW THAT I PROVED YOU WRONG? Several Times? GlowWorm1962 has the highest rating comment and why? Because he is right about this video which has totally mislead you to believe it's real...

    That so called evidence you have cannot be counted because it is so blurry that you cannot identify anything...

  • @deathmetalshredify

    "F OFF"

    U asked about my opinion.

    "GlowWorm is right"

    U fail to address that the woman's story changed.

    "evidence you have can't b counted b/c so blurry"

    Blurring them doesn't make choppers descend from on high in formation & do hairpin turns & emit bright pulsing white light & jiggle around & leave trails & induce river surface flashing lights.

  • @naudetsleuth I never asked for your opinion ever because I really didn't want you to keep commenting on everything I say. What do you mean by the "womans story"?

    Now how do you know it those "ufos" are actually jiggling around? It's obviously the pixels moving around which quite often happens when you have low quality video and when taking screenshots from these low quality videos. Stop attempting to convince me, you spend too much time trying to jump on people's opinions, they are opinions!

  • @deathmetalshredify

    "I never asked for your opinion"

    U asked "u believe bad acting is real?"

    Her story changed when she started calling it fake in '02. In '00&01 she called it real.

    I think someone got to her b/c of similarity btwn her film & many similar things filmed on 9/11.

    The jiggling of the orbs at tinyurl com/canaleorbpair is self-evident. Bad focus doesn't cause jiggling, trails, pulsing lights.

    "Stop attempting to convince me."

    Confusing your made-up mind w/facts!

  • @naudetsleuth Nadetsleuth: "I never asked for your opinion"

    U asked "u believe bad acting is real?"

    This came from you, your english is terrible by the way... and by the way if your going to quote someone, do it effectively and properly. If the quote is not 100% true, who would be expected to believe you. That question was meant to be hypothetical, You now have proven to me that you have a low IQ because you tried to answer a hypothetical question.

  • @deathmetalshredify

    The woman changed her story. Therefore her current claim that it was an acting job can't be trusted.

  • @naudetsleuth -- That's not true, you don't have any proof if the person who wrote or changed the story was indeed Barbara or other person. -- Do you have any proof of that 'naudetsleuth'?

  • Other writing in her name calls it real and seems like her. Orig. cover letter (unknown actresses don't get hired to play themselves!) includes refe. to her love life & friends - not stuff to lightly fictionalize about. In it, AND her SyFy forum posts, AND her website she CONSISTENTLY ID's herself as a Star Trek fan. Her forum posts complain of BAD TREATMENT BY SYFY & about being STALKED by phone - not lighthearted jokes that SyFy would want to invent.

    She was pressured to recant after 9/11.

  • @naudetsleuth "So you believe that the bad acting in this is real?" This is obviously a hypothetical question...

  • @naudetsleuth What about witnesses that actually saw 9/11 first hand, I don't think anyone reported UFO's, you can't convince me that there were UFO's there, because there wasn't any... Now I do believe there is some other intelligent life but I don't think they would be present there. Just give up and leave me alone!

  • @deathmetalshredify UFOs were filemed by tourists and Manhattanites in the years prior to and during 9-11. When else in Earth History had what were once the largest man-made buildings in the world been totally obliterated? Of course time-travelers and extraterrestrials would be intrested in covering and observing this unprecedented event!

  • @Beamshipcaptain I guess you have a point, I'm not denying that there were any there, I'm simply saying that there is NO Evidence of them being there at that time. If I'm around the time when the extraterrestrials show up to meet us, I'd be thrilled!

  • @naudetsleuth -- Flying stuff? It could be debris, or birds, or any other objects. Don't tell me you know what it was. Do you know what that stuff was 'naudetsleuth'?

  • for the longest time i thought this was real,the ufo on this vid.good job to plotted it in there like that,grahics n all.nice,nice job indeed.

  • It's a weather balloon...

  • If you think this is real you are a retard.

  • @jgum86

    "If you think this is real you are a retard."

    Name-calling is a lot easier than proving it's fake. That's why you name-call.

  • @naudetsleuth You'll find you qualify for a variety of mental; deficiencies for disagreeing with someone on youtube.

  • prove its not real

  • @Mr246886421

    "a ufo would not leave a contrail"

    Prove it. U means unidentified, so how would you have identified whether or not they leave contrails?

    Also how do you know it is even a contrail in the first place? How do you know it is not some smoke or vapor reaction between the air and the skin of the craft, during the great acceleration of that hairpin turn? What were the temperature, humidity and air pressure at the time of filming? Couldn't those factors have come in to play?

  • @naudetsleuth -- Humidity at JFK july 24 2000 was 51% ---bit. ly/oDkCVL--

    BARBARA POINTED HER ARM AT THE SAME TIME THE "UFO" START MOVING

    AND IT TOOK OFF WELL BEFORE IT GOT TO A STAND STILL POINT

    -alcione. org/FRAUDES/its_over_there_hap­pens_1.avi-

    FULL STORY:

    -alcione. org/VIDEONY1/videony1en.html-

    .

  • @CapFranz "POINTED ARM SAME TIME UFO START MOVING" LIAR! Object offscreen before arm onscreen. "IT TOOK OFF WELL BEFORE IT GOT TO A STAND STILL POINT." You don't know that, b/c it gets to that point OFFSCREEN. You are just MAKING STUFF UP! She CHANGED HER STORY. She was still calling it real ("HISTORICAL DOCUMENT") in Nov.2001: tinyurl com/sicuranzahistoricaldocumen­t She didn't start calling it an acting job 'til June2002: tinyurl com/sicuranzaresume Someone got to her.
  • @naudetsleuth -- I agree, I am a LIAR. it was a UFO. Barbara saw a UFO. She pointed at the UFO before it got to a stand still position over the Hudson river. There was NO MAYDAY call from chopper pilot to Air Traffic Control. There are NO witnesess from a more than 8 (eight) million populated NY City (year 2000), not ONE SINGLE REPORT from people in the TOWERS. Not a single call to FDNY or any emergency agency.

    SEE FULL STORY:

    -alcione. org/VIDEONY1/videony1en.html-

    .

  • @CapFranz

    "I agree, I'm a LIAR."

    U said orb & arm started moving at same time. But orb leaves frame b4 arm enters. So YES, U LIE.

    "NO MAYDAY/witnesses, not ONE REPORT"

    U make stuff up. U don't prove those things didn't happen. It's on less than 15sec, & usu moving, & very fast, & high up. That could explain lack of witness. Or maybe u just missed the report(s).

    How do u explain the fact that she changed her story? I think someone got to her b/c her footage resembles 9/11 ufo's.

  • @naudetsleuth --

    This is my investigation page:

    --alcione. org/VIDEONY1/videony1en.html-

    Whre is yours?

    .

  • @CapFranz

    "06/10/2003 - From: SciFiHappens - 'I say from now on we don't talk about any of the three completely fake and bogus videos on this site. okay?' "

    This is ambiguous, for two reasons.

    1

    There were FOUR SyFy Happens vids. Ufo, bugs, magnet boy, and Champ monster.

    2

    If they meant the ufo vid was fake, they are conveniently CHANGING THEIR STORY after 9/11, JUST LIKE BARBARA. Apparently to avoid the uncomfortable issue of such crafts' involvement in the attacks.

  • @naudetsleuth ---1.--- Distance from chopper to WTC is approx 1 to 2 km.-- The Craft travels that distance in less than a 1/4 of a second. We know this because it takes around 8 frames for it to reach the position of the Camera. (It is shot in standard NTSC 29 fps)-- If it travels 2km a 1/4 second.--It travels 8km every second.---It travels 480km every minute.-- Therefore it travels 28800km/h. -- Sound Travels through the Atmosphere at around 345 Meters a second (around 1242km/h)-- Contd - 2

  • @CapFranz

    I guess you concede that SyFy's "fake & bogus" comment is ambiguous.

    Yes these things can move thousands of miles an hour. See two more fast wtc ufo's compared to this one at

    tinyurl com/wtcufo

    Who knows whether they are conventional objects as we understand them with hard surfaces pushing through air. In other such vids they have a number of inexplicable properties like shapeshifting, and casting "shadows" comprised of white light and toward the sun.

  • Comment removed

  • @naudetsleuth -- Read my statement: "I believe in the possibility of existence of intelligent extraterrestrial beings

    who apparently are sailing with challenge their vehicles in our atmosphere or in space and whose real origin is unknown, but based on the anomalous behavior in various visible evidences shown and officially documented by several countriesthey have demonstrated a superior technology which allows us to think that those intelligent beings are aliens to Planet Earth" --

  • @CapFranz

    "Read my statement."

    Your grammar could be better, but at least you speak more than one language, unlike me. :) I respect your openness to the existence of ET life. But it's not relevant to me in this discussion. I think the SyFy and 9/11 WTC ufo's are terrestrial, US military objects. I never took ufo's seriously until 9/11.

  • it's real!

  • To all of you idiots saying this is fake IT IS REAL!! I was the one flying the ufo, you fucking douchebags

  • @OneJibed lololololol funny stuff

  • Comment removed

  • FAKE LIKE OBAMA

  • just a german engineered flying saucer :D

  • Fake but cool as hell.

  • i think its real ... why not ?

  • @MrKugelSicher It is real. And its not military/ black budget craft. One fact all scientists agree on: we are not alone in the universe. As of 2011, we know of overf 100 planets outside our own Sol system. The twin towers are not there any more. A pivotal event in Earth History. 300 people died. Time traveors and or extraterrestrial people woud beinterested in these structures, and 9/11.

  • @Beamshipcaptain

    "its not military/ black budget craft."

    The military hypothesis is simpler than the ET hypothesis and fits the evidence equally well, therefore it should be favored. Going from "other life is somewhere out there in the vastness" to "that ET life visits here and cares about our affairs" is your unjustified leap of fancy. You cannot justify that presumption logically.

  • @naudetsleuth It is totally logical that there is life elsewhere in the univere. It is totally logical that some of that life is old enough to have a technological civilization similar to ours. It is totally logical to assume that what we can do, others, elsewhere in the universe can do as well. It is totally logical to assume that aliens from off the earth are interested in our conflicts, wars, and mass-destructions. And that is what we have seen historically since the early days of WW -II.

  • fake like obama

  • film naprawde przekonywujący :D ten pióropusz dymu naprawde wygląda realnie LIKE REAL :P

  • That's super fake but actually a dope video. Now we know who's behind it XD

  • There are UFOs out there, watch the movie called "chariot of the gods" they will show some evidence about aliens that visited earth in the past. They located astronauts, space ships, ETs and some airplanes painted in the caves thousands of yrs ago. Even catholic church have spaceships painted next to Jesus by the artists of the time. Even the pyramids in egypt might have been built by aliens thousands of yrs because no one know how men built them with rocks that weight millions of pounds.

  • @proudtobebrazilian bullshit. millions of pounds? cmon

  • I had sex with that woman. That's all I can attest to at this point.

  • @popper666 so you had sex with that woman and the sexual deseases she got from you went to her brain?

  • fake as shit

  • its a bird no a fog no a plane huh its a flying mermaid hhahaha ;()

  • its roger smith visiting his family

  • sorry, my frisbee had a mind of his own

  • It's a squirrel.

  • Maybe a Stealth Bomber? :D

  • No.

  • /watch?v=mOZCdZ6i72I&feature=r­elated look its real

  • this is like porn for beleavers like me

  • --world trade center bombing was ufo coverup by us gov cia fbi

  • get the whole story at science fiction website!

  • fakest fake ive ever seen

  • This is a promo video, filmed for the Sci-Fi channel in 2000.

    The woman is an actress called Barbara Sicuranza; if you look at her IMDb profile you'll see it's her.

    This clip is also listed on the resume page of her personal website at: w w w . mysteriousmysteries . com It's listed as "SCI-FI Promo (The Blimp) / Principal / Sci Fi Channel"

    Now behave yourselves ;-)

  • @GlowWorm1962 In 2000? well, I know this appeared a few days after 911 and it was said this couple was flying around in the helicopter or something and they saw this, this was supposedly a day before the attacks...

    But I don't know really, it seems it's fake after all.

  • it is like the one John Lennon seen......

  • I'VE SEEN ONE JUST LIKE THIS WITH MY YOUNGER BROTHER AND SISTER WHEN I WAS A KID....

  • Fake and gay.

    See, the woman in the video wears a mullet.

    No-one in the right mind wears a mullet nowadays.

  • @iTziiMuNeZz more fake than gay

  • But remember this was beofer 9/11 . lol

  • @ManOnTheMoonV2 You got me!

    :D

  • jarlath@live.ie my boss has a helicopter in ireland and anytime i travelled with him you had to wear a headset because you could not talk to each other............this video is too quiet to be in a chopper

  • if people only knew what this video really means!~~~~This shit for reals baby!

  • Only one country could do this with such finess & split second timing- You think an "ignorant Muslim" had all the skill to do such task> Friday, Sept14, 2001 "NYT reported Thurs that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tues, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards." Who do you think they were? Palestinians? Iraq? Al-Qaeda, surely? Wrong. They were Israelis and two of them were Israeli agents, working for Mossad, as in Israel

  • that is reflection of light

  • 0:11 real ufo

  • @007iloveJesus that's some algebraic equation you got there.

  • 0:20 Nitro ftw

  • Its amazing what they can do with computer effects these days.

  • Frankly, this is in bad taste, even for the Sci Fi channel. Unless they came out with this promo before 911.

  • @lonstar70 yeah, this was before 9/11. Happens was a scifi program. I think this clip was made just for promo use. In anycase the program was nolonger onair when 9/11 happened, nor any direct links to this video/happens page on scifi's website. However it was still on the sever for a year or so after 9/11, so people who remembered it could still visit scifi/happens and watch this video. After 9-11 of course people downloaded the video, and tried to spread it as some real 9-11 warning video.

  • if real & therefore unexpected by the people in the helicopter, how did the camera man know exactly where to very quickly move his camera to precisely capture the ufo suddenly blasting upward into the sky? this stuck out in my mind as suspect when i first saw it without knowing about its being a computer generated hoax for a sci-fi commercial. goes to show you really can't trust 100% in ufo videos & pictures in this new age of computers. a ufo video, to be good, needs additional corroboration.

  • She said "Its over there" before it was even "over there". People, this is from SciFi, totally fake!!

  • 0:16 the"ship" stay there about 3 seconds and after it speed UP! it's fake!

  • So aliens caused 911. I KNEW IT!!!

  • In that ship near World Trade Center, inside was Nostradamus with one alien groups, they show to Nostradamus the future flying from one year to another.

  • Dobrze, że nie mam monitora 3D, bo bym się z krzesła zjebał...

  • "is that the world trade center?" why would she ask that? that is pretty much common knowledge.

  • Comment removed

  • ugh... :P

  • johnny rocket fingers suck it ya

  • johnny rocket fingers suck it

  • the thing is this isn't fake my sub teacher told me and showed me this video at my school library he used to work for the government and make spy planes for them. and he showe me this video he told me it wasnt fake and it is the governments ufo they have produced in 2001 which has a base speed at 11 thousand miles per hour and he told me that they wernt meant to scare people it was meant to see how they react

  • @kaylamurphey

    LOL was your sub teacher a redneck alcoholic former President called George

  • !_( )!_

    

  • nice flair gun , I think i'm gonna go buy one right now

  • 0:11 look between the WTC you could see the UFO going alone the right side of the tower, thats when she points out to it!