I guess for a modern movie it is rather nice, though the power of the English kings and queens over the English realm has as much declined as the art created about them! Just think of the deep fall between Henry IV for example and George III so no wonder that the king did get mad; or the English mistook him: He may have only pretended to be mad in order to have the English resume the war against the Americans like Solon did in Athens because of Salamis; plus the Shakespeare quotes are amicable.
Contrary to what people think, George III wasn't insane, he was extremely ill and suffered from porphyria, his acting out was due to being in immense pain
chance Anthony Hopkins had never ever accepted the role of Hannibal Lector in the real classic horror movie Silence of the Lambs well from a neutral standpoint I do simply think Ian Holm would have been really tremendous I honestly believe portraying Lector he definitely has the look of playing an very evil clever sinister and remotely deranged character like Hannibal if you have ever witnessed him in Alien then of course you might know directly where I'm coming from, Ian Holm as Lector oh yeah
This very stunning movie has just literally always been a real personal favorite of mine a very fabulous breathtaking masterpiece, Ian Holm was quite simply in my very own estimationexceptional in just about every single way possible definitely a very talented wonderful extremely nice charming humble actor who I had the ultimate pleasure of meeting once he honestly is such a nice interesting talkative person with a good funny sense of humour, you know I have always wondered that if by any.
This King is unique in a sense that he sired so many children with his queen and had no mistress. It is rare to see a sovreign with such a high level of morality.
I personally support polygamy to secure a steady paternal line of succession for Japan.
@Kenta19191919 What is also amazing is that across the channel, King Louis XVI also had a scrupulous standard of morality. He loved his Queen, had no mistress and frowned on gambling and vice. He also was a good man that was overwhelmed by circumstances.
@Kenta19191919 Well I know his brother the Comte de Provence thought he would have been a better king and his first cousin, the Duc d'Orleans plotted constantly against the King and in the end voted for his death! With a family like that who needed enemies??
@Kenta19191919 Their plotting destroyed the monarchy and that was the greatest tragedy of all. France has never known stability since then and is now on its FIFTH republic. The history of France is one big bloodbath of revolution and coup d'etat. The greatest disgrace of the Western World.
It is an interesting debate for the Japanese like myself. He now have the oldest royal house in the world and we have enjoyed great continuities in some social aspects but we have become a nation with no bottom.
France is respected and well noted as a major power and she will never tolerate any diplomatic insult and will duly retaliate in desired either in obvious or subtle ways.
Look at Japan. Even a third rate country like North Korea can get away with kidnapping many Japanese.
@Kenta19191919 The defeat of Japan in WWII and the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki still weigh heavy on Japan. Until the WWII generation are gone I don't see a change from Japan. As for French diplomacy I think it always placates the Arab world and quickly criticizes Israel. I will never forget the French attack on Greenpeace; THAT was an affront to the earth. France still acts as a major power but really has feet of clay!
@fairgirl7 Too true. It's not just the five republics though, it's also the two French empires, the one Bourbon restoration, and who can forget Vichy France?
George III was only 50 when the story takes place. Hawthorne was 66 and looked it. They should have cast a younger actor. The worst miscasting though was a slim, 36-year-old 6'4" Rupert Everett as the obese, 5'6", 26-year-old Prince of Wales.
I agree with Everett. But I do think, despite the age difference, that Hawthorne is pretty much perfect in the role. I think it was right to ignore the age difference in that respect.
@PeterFirthFan nobody moans about Hugh Laurie in Blackadder III. I do agree about that though a lot of people now don't realise the prince regent was about as skinny as an american on holiday. Still even if he was 16 years older he played the part brilliantly, RIP Nigel Hawthorne
George was not mad, he was just very ill, with a condition no one understood at the time. But two world class actors the late great Sir Nigel Hawthorne and Sir Ian Holm
Aww. Not all of us Yanks feel like that. You know that America is England's child! We just get a little bit rebellious sometimes =} As our demographics change though as well as Englands our relationship might change. To have an English outlook seems to be a dying mindset. Our spoiled American college students want change and so they have it. A moraless and valueless society is on its way here in the states.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
His Majesty King George was a tyrant and a war criminal of the United States of America. His taxation without represention, the suppression of the rights of man, and the oppression of the American cause is due and just cause of King George to be equally compared to a modern day Adolf Hitler or Mao Zedong, or Joseph Stalin.
As for myself, my loyalties would lie with General Geroge Washington and not the Mad King.
No matter which way you percieve George R, the actions of Washington and every other colonial who took up arms against their King was an act of treason, plain and simple. At that time there was no such thing as "the United States of America". A convenient collection of disloyal colonies an little more. I notice you didn't see fit to turn away British Troops when the French were threatening Albany. "American cause, rights of man, Joseph Stalin"...Loyalty to a toothless slave owner.
I like the fact your country seems to conveniently forget the mass generside of the of the Native Americans or your countrys part in the Slave Trade when you bash on about the suppression of he rights of man. Nor can I comprehend the idea of comparing the "unfair taxation" of tea to the mass murder of over 6 million Jews. I think you need to get your facts right before start acting like an over opinionated turd!
This King is unique in a sense that he sired so many children with his queen and had no mistress. It is rare to see a sovreign with such a high level of morality.
I personally support polygamy to secure a steady paternal line of succession for Japan.
King George III actually stands as one of the longest reigning monarchs of an English throne. Some exciting things happened during his reign: American Revolution, French Revolution, Napoleanic Wars, American War of 1812, and the beginning erosions of the British Slave Trade. Rather progressive when compared with his predecessors, despite his conflicts with Americans.
Uh, I actually have a little more sympathy for George III, his problem was actually a physical medical condition. Bush's antics are from being an underdeveloped, over-grown frat house jerk.
Poor Fear E Uh? Poor as in lacking good judgement, Much Fear of something ahead of said sin, E as in Ecstasy which he craved, and Uh, as in what anyone reading this will say.
I guess for a modern movie it is rather nice, though the power of the English kings and queens over the English realm has as much declined as the art created about them! Just think of the deep fall between Henry IV for example and George III so no wonder that the king did get mad; or the English mistook him: He may have only pretended to be mad in order to have the English resume the war against the Americans like Solon did in Athens because of Salamis; plus the Shakespeare quotes are amicable.
FireEyedMaidOfWar 9 months ago
"NO SIR! YOU ARE THE PATIENT!" LOL classic!
oliverarado 1 year ago
King George III = Best King Ever
MajBlood 1 year ago
Fuck King George !
nemoyellow 1 year ago
Contrary to what people think, George III wasn't insane, he was extremely ill and suffered from porphyria, his acting out was due to being in immense pain
Zeruel3 1 year ago 2
Sometimes a little "restraint" is necessary!
farmerne 1 year ago
"I am the King of England."
"No sir, you are the patient."
Brilliant.
bythefault 1 year ago
@bythefault Shouldn't it have been King of the United Kingdom?
JuanMacready 1 year ago
@JuanMacready
The United Kingdom came into existence when the crowns of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland united in 1801.
chrisrants86 1 year ago
chance Anthony Hopkins had never ever accepted the role of Hannibal Lector in the real classic horror movie Silence of the Lambs well from a neutral standpoint I do simply think Ian Holm would have been really tremendous I honestly believe portraying Lector he definitely has the look of playing an very evil clever sinister and remotely deranged character like Hannibal if you have ever witnessed him in Alien then of course you might know directly where I'm coming from, Ian Holm as Lector oh yeah
moviebuff1986 1 year ago
@moviebuff1986 Luckily we got Sir William Gull a.k.a Jack the Ripper :)
Bilbo1209 1 year ago
This very stunning movie has just literally always been a real personal favorite of mine a very fabulous breathtaking masterpiece, Ian Holm was quite simply in my very own estimationexceptional in just about every single way possible definitely a very talented wonderful extremely nice charming humble actor who I had the ultimate pleasure of meeting once he honestly is such a nice interesting talkative person with a good funny sense of humour, you know I have always wondered that if by any.
moviebuff1986 1 year ago
This King is unique in a sense that he sired so many children with his queen and had no mistress. It is rare to see a sovreign with such a high level of morality.
I personally support polygamy to secure a steady paternal line of succession for Japan.
Kenta19191919 1 year ago
@Kenta19191919 What is also amazing is that across the channel, King Louis XVI also had a scrupulous standard of morality. He loved his Queen, had no mistress and frowned on gambling and vice. He also was a good man that was overwhelmed by circumstances.
fairgirl7 1 year ago
@fairgirl7
I also heard that some of his nobles plotted against him, even his own cousins.
Kenta19191919 1 year ago
@Kenta19191919 Well I know his brother the Comte de Provence thought he would have been a better king and his first cousin, the Duc d'Orleans plotted constantly against the King and in the end voted for his death! With a family like that who needed enemies??
fairgirl7 1 year ago
@fairgirl7
I think both of them eventually became Kings of France (Louis XVIII and Charles X?) but only as constitutional monarchs.
Did they not realise earlier that plotting against their own king was likely to destroy the absoluteness of the monarchy for good?
Kenta19191919 1 year ago
@Kenta19191919 Their plotting destroyed the monarchy and that was the greatest tragedy of all. France has never known stability since then and is now on its FIFTH republic. The history of France is one big bloodbath of revolution and coup d'etat. The greatest disgrace of the Western World.
fairgirl7 1 year ago
@fairgirl7
It is an interesting debate for the Japanese like myself. He now have the oldest royal house in the world and we have enjoyed great continuities in some social aspects but we have become a nation with no bottom.
France is respected and well noted as a major power and she will never tolerate any diplomatic insult and will duly retaliate in desired either in obvious or subtle ways.
Look at Japan. Even a third rate country like North Korea can get away with kidnapping many Japanese.
Kenta19191919 1 year ago
@Kenta19191919 The defeat of Japan in WWII and the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki still weigh heavy on Japan. Until the WWII generation are gone I don't see a change from Japan. As for French diplomacy I think it always placates the Arab world and quickly criticizes Israel. I will never forget the French attack on Greenpeace; THAT was an affront to the earth. France still acts as a major power but really has feet of clay!
fairgirl7 1 year ago
@fairgirl7 Too true. It's not just the five republics though, it's also the two French empires, the one Bourbon restoration, and who can forget Vichy France?
moninoff 1 year ago
interesting choice of zadok the priest there....
HMservant 2 years ago
Yup! A little "restraint" is sometimes necessary, and can work wonders. Even with a crazy King.
zooeyhall 2 years ago
hahaha yep!
Lotusflowerism 2 years ago
Der Film ist genial, basta!
Es findet sich immer und überall jemand, der an allem und jedem herummäkeln muß!
Ätzend!
AudreyHorneII 2 years ago
The "Illness of King George" doesen't quite have the same ring to it....
happymax1 2 years ago
the mental instabilities of King George?
bulked 2 years ago
Nigel Hawthorne was far too old for the part.
PeterFirthFan 2 years ago
Absolute rubbish I am afraid - this is one of the best films I have watched and his performance is superb.
ivankinsman 2 years ago
George III was only 50 when the story takes place. Hawthorne was 66 and looked it. They should have cast a younger actor. The worst miscasting though was a slim, 36-year-old 6'4" Rupert Everett as the obese, 5'6", 26-year-old Prince of Wales.
PeterFirthFan 2 years ago
I agree with Everett. But I do think, despite the age difference, that Hawthorne is pretty much perfect in the role. I think it was right to ignore the age difference in that respect.
jammythedodger 2 years ago
@PeterFirthFan nobody moans about Hugh Laurie in Blackadder III. I do agree about that though a lot of people now don't realise the prince regent was about as skinny as an american on holiday. Still even if he was 16 years older he played the part brilliantly, RIP Nigel Hawthorne
RandomSam189 1 year ago
George was not mad, he was just very ill, with a condition no one understood at the time. But two world class actors the late great Sir Nigel Hawthorne and Sir Ian Holm
juzt156 2 years ago
I think the doctor is much more lunatic than the king....
kathykisslight 2 years ago
One of the most emotional scenes
kinkyplunk 2 years ago 2
poor king george
Berno10011001 2 years ago 2
Poor George :(
SaxonYear410 2 years ago 2
ian holm is a master actor
lamlyn 2 years ago 15
"No Sir! You are the patient!!"
nujac321 2 years ago 4
HAWTHORNE: "I am the King of England!"
HOLM: "No, sir! You are the PATIENT!"
XD
Jal8919536 2 years ago 6
Oscar worthy.
Sakamachi25 2 years ago 2
Agreed.
kutzak159 2 years ago
Indeed he was nominated for an Oscar..... unfortunately it was the same year a Tom Hanks and Forrest Gump.
RJY4356 2 years ago
I can think of a few people who could be helped by treatments like that LOL
mowriter 3 years ago 6
pleaz will sum1 upload the whole of this movie i cant find anywhere to watch it
Elliator101 3 years ago 2
Poor George was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
joeysn7hvn 3 years ago 4
Aww. Not all of us Yanks feel like that. You know that America is England's child! We just get a little bit rebellious sometimes =} As our demographics change though as well as Englands our relationship might change. To have an English outlook seems to be a dying mindset. Our spoiled American college students want change and so they have it. A moraless and valueless society is on its way here in the states.
vlovemeordiev 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thats just crap.
NaMgKCa 2 years ago
Yeah just like a yank take a look in your own corridoors of power.
ADZ4EVRE 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
His Majesty King George was a tyrant and a war criminal of the United States of America. His taxation without represention, the suppression of the rights of man, and the oppression of the American cause is due and just cause of King George to be equally compared to a modern day Adolf Hitler or Mao Zedong, or Joseph Stalin.
As for myself, my loyalties would lie with General Geroge Washington and not the Mad King.
YogaNate79 3 years ago
No matter which way you percieve George R, the actions of Washington and every other colonial who took up arms against their King was an act of treason, plain and simple. At that time there was no such thing as "the United States of America". A convenient collection of disloyal colonies an little more. I notice you didn't see fit to turn away British Troops when the French were threatening Albany. "American cause, rights of man, Joseph Stalin"...Loyalty to a toothless slave owner.
Hallenbach 3 years ago 7
I like the fact your country seems to conveniently forget the mass generside of the of the Native Americans or your countrys part in the Slave Trade when you bash on about the suppression of he rights of man. Nor can I comprehend the idea of comparing the "unfair taxation" of tea to the mass murder of over 6 million Jews. I think you need to get your facts right before start acting like an over opinionated turd!
LambrettaSXsepcial 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This genocide (learn to spell) started under the crown.
MacLanny 2 years ago
No, George III was not a tyrant, he was a constitutional monarch acting according to the advice of his ministers.
HarveyCartwright 3 years ago 18
This has been flagged as spam show
@HarveyCartwright
This King is unique in a sense that he sired so many children with his queen and had no mistress. It is rare to see a sovreign with such a high level of morality.
I personally support polygamy to secure a steady paternal line of succession for Japan.
Kenta19191919 1 year ago
Just my own opinion: the three best movies of the last 30 years are set in the 18th century; King George, Amadeus, and Danton.
fedtrooper 3 years ago 2
couldn't agree with you more.here here!
Hallenbach 3 years ago
Hey! Hey! What? What?
StJamesCourt 3 years ago
nigel hawthorne is/was one of the finest actors the world has/had ever seen.
noersang 3 years ago
In those days everyone spoke in platitudes.
procommenter 3 years ago
one of the best films ever
Mendisal 3 years ago
I can´t believe that fucking peasant ("doctor") did that to the King. And I can´t believe his bodyguards betrayed him, fucking rats.
BryceDawkins 3 years ago
what is that music called at the start of the film.. its when the king is getting dressed ??
john151988 3 years ago
is it not 'Zadok the Priest' from Handel's 'Messiah'? same as in this scene...?
roshagawa 2 years ago
It is not from the Messiah.
nujac321 2 years ago
The Overture to Handel's Oratorio 'Saul'.
muiris89 2 years ago
Batshit-insane kings are fucking awesome.
I would've just let George do what we he wanted to do, i'd be a good friend for him.
"Come on George! We need to light the castle on fire before the grass becomes upset with us!"
SirSmokeal0t 3 years ago 4
One of the more intelligent films out there..and the pot is dwindling. thanks. one of my very faves.
mithar 3 years ago
Okay. Thanks anyway.
83survivor 3 years ago
Can you post the whole movie, please? It's a classic. One of Nigel's best.
83survivor 3 years ago
Sorry but I can't do that! If you want to see it, try some videostore or the internet!
Bilbo1209 3 years ago
@83survivor Play.com are selling it for £4.49 at present. Snap it up! Great film.
truthseekerlee 10 months ago
King George III actually stands as one of the longest reigning monarchs of an English throne. Some exciting things happened during his reign: American Revolution, French Revolution, Napoleanic Wars, American War of 1812, and the beginning erosions of the British Slave Trade. Rather progressive when compared with his predecessors, despite his conflicts with Americans.
Flowbee79 4 years ago
That's footmen for you,to busy bumming each other than learning to fight!
j1o2h3n4n5y 4 years ago
so sad!
gotahc 4 years ago
God, medicine was so brutal back then.
gw7709 4 years ago
LOL, Hilarious, that king reminds me of King George Bush the lunatic, they both share so much in common.
XionXXXX 4 years ago
Uh, I actually have a little more sympathy for George III, his problem was actually a physical medical condition. Bush's antics are from being an underdeveloped, over-grown frat house jerk.
Flowbee79 4 years ago
Thank you!!! Porphyria is what he had!!!
Peace
SpiritCrazyHorse 2 years ago 2
Poor Fear E Uh? Poor as in lacking good judgement, Much Fear of something ahead of said sin, E as in Ecstasy which he craved, and Uh, as in what anyone reading this will say.
judahbenkenobi 2 years ago 2
XionXXXX I would take King George over George Bush any day.
smoky90210 2 years ago 3
Very, very impressive performances from both Holm and Hawthorne
TomthatiscalledTom 4 years ago 4
Two great actors indeed.
Flowbee79 4 years ago 2
If I were the King's doctor, I'd have the ego and fortitude to match the King himself.
ffairlane57 4 years ago
wats that music at the beginning?
Frostylude 4 years ago
Zadok the Priest - Handel ;)
czar2rodolfo 4 years ago
I fell in love with Nigel Hawthorne a little when I first saw this film. I'm still appalled that he lost the oscar to Tom Hanks.
talentissexy 4 years ago
for those of us who have, at any time, been deemed worthy of being restrained, i understand, i have been there myself.
...but remember, they can never restrain your
imagination.
peace
julianveronica 4 years ago 2
beautiful
nerdg0han 4 years ago