@DragonClutch That's because Mike Carriker was the pilot who is a LEGEND in the industry. He has so many hours in so many aircraft along with over 300 aircraft carrier landings among other distinctions. He works for Boeing and is an AMAZING pilot which is most likely an understatement.
hey boeing you got the build a bigger plane! the 747 + wide bodies has been pass up.YOU are now #2 because you allowed yourself to relax with good enough,has the leadership fell asleep at the wheel ???? your 787 is nice but it still smaller than airbus, people want a huge plane REMEMBER WHY EVERONE WANTED A 747
this was such a huge plane.. i wish i could pilot it...next year ill take my college and i'd like to be a pilot but we dont have enough money to take this course.. i'd like to ask who would like to be the sponsor so that i can study ...thanks so much..godbless.. please help me
@marold29, I'm a commercial aviation major at the University of North Dakota and our Air Force ROTC program is paying for all of my tuition so if you need money for school you should consider ROTC.
@hobbseltoff ah ok but her in philippines i thought no rotc here. you have your own to study air transportation...but it so expensive thats why i'm looking for a scholarship or financial assistance...its ok thank you
@marold29 here in chile you need more or less 30 thousand dollars for all the private, IFR and commercial pilot license, in total.... i think in canada or the US is more expensive, and we have really good pilots and a really good airline (LAN).... consider it....
@marold29 If you love flying, get a good paying job other than commercial flying and fly a private plane for fun. Or, join the military. Commercial pilots dont make as good money as they used to, the glamor is gone, and you really dont do much more than sit there and babysit instruments anyway, and as the latest technology become more commonplace it will become more and more hands off for the pilot. First 5 years, dont expect to make more than 30k pa. To make six figures you'd have to be top 5%
I have to admit, though I didn't see the big deal when Boeing announced the 787 it is a very...majestic looking aircraft, the way the wings curve during flight.
What was that thing hanging out from the tail?? It might have been a remote airspeed sensing device of some time, in order to see how accurately the onboard instruments were reporting actual fying conditions. That's just a guess!!! The plane seems to have a lot of dihedral in the wings!!! Pretty bird!
It measures static pressure. I think this to allow them to calibrate the instruments to what will be the permanent static source on the aircraft in the future.
AircraftCompare DOTcom provides exact details of around every aircraft in the world from the past present to the FUTURE FLYING CARS, with photos specs price and everything else. Compare side by side the Boeing 747 and the Airbus A380 or the MIG with the F16 etc, get access to category wise airplane and helicopter rankings, meet the prominent figures from the aerospace industry through the community..
0:43 seems unsteady at this point. There is low wind...the lights could be on cause of dense fog and visibilty issue. The landing looks like normal landing noticing an effort to keep the nose down 1:23. 1:33 the nose comes back up routinely. Other than that it maintaines a level landing.
its called flying a visual approach dude... its not going to be perfect, I didnt notice anything out of the ordinary when flying VFR. im sure boing remembered to install a trim tab, the bobbing of the nose is just standerd minor adjustments to the approach, again nothing abnormal, that was a beutiful approach, and landing.
Nooooo, Boeing have beautiful planes. She's not called Queen of the Skies because she's ugly. The 747 is a classically elegant design of which Boeing have been good at for a very long time.
I look at the aesthetic between Boeing and Airbus comparable to the automobiles- different people have different preferences. There is certainly no other plane like the 747. The 787 is elegant and sleek but not radically different from say an A330, a beauty in its own. You can tell i'm a bit of an airliner geek, can't you?
@onnomon I agree but compare the 747 to the hideously ugly a380! Boeings have always tended to be more aesthetically pleasing and this is another example.
@STFCcreamemlads I believe the highly swept wings are a new method for economic flying? i think, prove me if im wrong, but i think i remember reading somewhere that it improves fuel efficiency during all aspects of flight.
The new 747 is getting those sweptback wings; they are the future and the new A350, Airbus's late, late entry to compete with the 787 is getting them too.
A new 747? Wow, do you know if they are going to redesign and try to get the largest commercial airliner record back? I hope so, I'd quite like to see what they do
lockerz(dot)com is a site where you can gather ptz points by answering ,playing or simply logging in to your free account ,with these points you can redeem some valuable prizes(like ipods,ps3,macbook,etc)..PM me((your email)) here in youtube if you are interested and i will instantly send you an invetation.. you cant join unless your invited from a member,sign quick and save up some ptz before it fully launches
lockerz(dot)com is a site where you can gather ptz points by answering ,playing or simply logging in to your free account ,with these points you can redeem some valuable prizes(like ipods,ps3,macbook,etc)..PM me((your email)) here in youtube if you are interested and i will instantly send you an invetation.. you cant join unless your invited from a member,sign quick and save up some ptz before it fully launches
I've flown both Airbus and Boeing planes for Virgin Atlantic for nearly 7 years folks. There is simply no comparison. The 747, 777 simply outperform the Airbus A380 and A300. Boeing has been doing it longer and better for decades now and it will take decades more (if ever) for Airbus to achieve anything close to what Boeing engineers have done. The 787 set the bar a tad higher today and in fine fashion i might add!
If you were a pilot, you'd know that despite some design philosophies that one may or may not like, Airbus a/c are every bit as good as boeing aircraft on a performance standpoint. They have a 50:50 market share for a reason.
Your profile doesn't seem like that of a pilot at all, and it says you are 24yrs old. So you fly long haul with Virgin Atlantic since your 17? ROFL.
Fucking liar.
Good job perpetuating this silly and irrational A vs B thing.
Virgin never flew 777s or A300s, the only airbus jets they fly or will fly are the A340, A330 (on order) and the A380 (on order). They also fly the 747 from boeing.
airboeingbus, I agree with you 100%. There's always gotta be someone to fire up an argument. I'm American, and I was excited to see the A380 fly it's maiden flight a while back. We will use technologies from others' studies, as they will use ours. Thats the way it works...
I just wonder how much the wings will flex when fully loaded.........Might scare the passengers to look out and see the wingtip 10 feet over the top of the fueslage and consider that normal
It is a beautiful aircraft and to see it flying is like watching a graceful bird soaring on the wind. Can't wait to have the chance to fly on it someday :-)
The curvature of the wing and the flex is nothing new on this bird...The wings of the 777 are dead stiff compared to the A330...this is the first Boeing aircraft to have true wing flex. The A380 wing is designed for high efficiency for its weight....in its class, it is far more efficient than anything flying, but the 787 has different requirements...like comparing apples with oranges.
The 787 is the first Boeing to have true wing flex??? You can't be serious...and please don't try and compare the super-efficient wing of the 777 with that of the pathetic A330/340 series aircraft. I love your quote about the A380 wing being designed for high efficiency, no seriously...and why would Airbus want that? Geez, thank you Mr. Obvious.
Go back to school kid....or when your Mummy lets you go and look at the first series 777, go compare with the 330 and tell me about wing flex. As for the A380...the inbuilt curves on the gull wing root make it need less speed on approach than a 747...horses for courses....ask your teacher at school to explain that to you.
Actually the 787 is a lot more fuel efficient than the A380. Transportation fuel efficiency is typically measured in the amount fuel (in liters) to transport one passenger 100 kilometers. The A380 is stated to be able to achieve 2.9 L/100 km per passenger while the 787 can achieve 2.4 L/100 km per passenger meaning it could save over 1500 gallons of fuel on a typical flight from KJFK to EGLL.
@hobbseltoff you're comparing two different types of aircraft..the a380 is a FULL double decker which weighs way more than the 787 which is obvious.. it's like comparing the fuel efficiency of a 757 and a 747..the fact that the a380 wastes .5L/100 KM more than the 787 is awesome for an aircraft of its size..
Actually no it doesn't. The Boeing museum in Everett has a mock-up of what the interior will be like and due to some major changes (most notable being the flat walls) the cabin will be a lot more roomy.
@hobbseltoff Meh, Airlines will have their choice of what they want in the interior and they will most likely go with a traditional accomidations with a 3 class configuration.
Fine, but give them some credit. Americans laughed in the 60s when they said they wanted to build jets to rival boeing & they have by pioneering a lot of stuff including, fly by wire, increased use of composites, health management systems etc. they do great work.
By the way airbus wings are made in the UK not France, their wings are British like the engines powering the 787 today & every airbus jet has a lot of stuff made in the USA in it, we can take pride in that.
no i dont think so. the A380 wings does not flex like this. all pictures i have seen of the A380 was a stiff wing supporting two heavy engines. the curvature of the 787 wing is distinctive and so i s the curvature on the 747-8i. boeing seriously needs to speed up development on the 777NG to stop the A350-900 dead in its tracks.
Watch some videos of A380, on landing you'll see the significant wing droop after the spoilers are deployed, on take-of as speed builds, those "gull" wings rise significantly. The A380s wing spars & some of the skin are carbon fibre & other composites u know. As for the 777 (perhaps my fav jet), boeing will need a new aircraft to compete especialy for the 772 market if airbus builds the A350 as well as the A380, the A350 & 787 are next gen, older models will struggle to compete with them.
Here's a great example of the flex you're talking about. Video X9YMXFkToac is a Quantas A380 landing.
Watch how much the wing flexes DOWNwards when she lands. I certainly wouldn't call it a "stiff wing." It's just that when the Airbus lifts off, the wings move into "neutral position" while the 787 flies with an upward flex.
They are both beautiful aircraft and both multinational efforts, so many different nations can be proud of recent aviation.
Agreed, though I wouldn't say they move into neutral, they flex up, with a span that long they have to flex a great deal. Any way you put it though, these are beautiful aircraft, its a great time for aviation fans, next stop the 747-8 and A350!
hey if you look closely its like there somethin hanging on the planes tail
brandan648 3 weeks ago
That is one Beautiful landing.
Kboman 6 months ago
it's called the dreamline because it's so boring it puts you to sleep
Bananayoghurt1000 6 months ago
I can never let my friend see this video if he finds out the 787 has wings like that I will never hear the end of his stupid jokes.
charlemagneischarles 1 year ago
SWEEETTT!
T1tansfan 1 year ago
the 747-8 also has these kind of wings!! go boeing!!! :D
Thebmwisthebest 1 year ago
WWHAT A LANDING !
SMOOOOOOOOOTH.
DragonClutch 1 year ago
@DragonClutch That's because Mike Carriker was the pilot who is a LEGEND in the industry. He has so many hours in so many aircraft along with over 300 aircraft carrier landings among other distinctions. He works for Boeing and is an AMAZING pilot which is most likely an understatement.
BarbaryPirates 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we love flying?
(2) Wy do we want to imagine that ocean animals can fly in the sky, especially children?
(3) Why do we like to imagine and to image aeroplanes as ocean animals? (eg. 747= whale & 787 = dolphin)
(4) Why do we want to build an aeroplane looking like a penguin in the ocean?
(5) Why do we enjoy to image sea animals are flying at sea?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we love flying?
(2) Wy do we want to imagine that ocean animals can fly in the sky, especially children?
(3) Why do we like to imagine and to image aeroplanes as ocean animals? (eg. 747= whale & 787 = dolphin)
(4) Why do we want to build an aeroplane looking like a penguin in the ocean?
(5) Why do we enjoy to image sea animals are flying at sea?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 1 year ago
softest landing I have ever seen
mazedarboy 1 year ago 3
brilliant!
Mystified012 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey boeing you got the build a bigger plane! the 747 + wide bodies has been pass up.YOU are now #2 because you allowed yourself to relax with good enough,has the leadership fell asleep at the wheel ???? your 787 is nice but it still smaller than airbus, people want a huge plane REMEMBER WHY EVERONE WANTED A 747
Conservativepacheat 1 year ago
wat is that at the rudder there .there is like a small ball thing.wads tat?
MysteryDark123 1 year ago
Boeing planes look better than airbus a/c
RoCalSan 1 year ago
i think the 787 will replace the 767
eventualty...
ronaldbuffalo2 1 year ago
Nice landing, Captain!
TheFlightFreak 1 year ago
this was such a huge plane.. i wish i could pilot it...next year ill take my college and i'd like to be a pilot but we dont have enough money to take this course.. i'd like to ask who would like to be the sponsor so that i can study ...thanks so much..godbless.. please help me
marold29 1 year ago
@marold29, I'm a commercial aviation major at the University of North Dakota and our Air Force ROTC program is paying for all of my tuition so if you need money for school you should consider ROTC.
hobbseltoff 1 year ago
@hobbseltoff ah ok but her in philippines i thought no rotc here. you have your own to study air transportation...but it so expensive thats why i'm looking for a scholarship or financial assistance...its ok thank you
marold29 1 year ago
Nice landing Boeing 787
TheFreighter747 1 year ago
@marold29 here in chile you need more or less 30 thousand dollars for all the private, IFR and commercial pilot license, in total.... i think in canada or the US is more expensive, and we have really good pilots and a really good airline (LAN).... consider it....
coxairman 1 year ago
@marold29 hobbseltoff is right, if your going to be a pilot, the Air Force is the best way to go.
nmbanana 1 year ago
@marold29 get the money yourself you lazy cunt. dont go expecting a bloody handout. get off your fat ass and get a job.
77magenta 10 months ago
@marold29 If you love flying, get a good paying job other than commercial flying and fly a private plane for fun. Or, join the military. Commercial pilots dont make as good money as they used to, the glamor is gone, and you really dont do much more than sit there and babysit instruments anyway, and as the latest technology become more commonplace it will become more and more hands off for the pilot. First 5 years, dont expect to make more than 30k pa. To make six figures you'd have to be top 5%
Tressiensia 6 months ago
Comment removed
marold29 1 year ago
thats was such a smooth fast landing
jemar121 1 year ago
flex your muscles, flex your wings baby!
Boeing ftw
ParasiteQueen1 1 year ago 6
Love the wings on this plane!
HorsesAndPlanes 1 year ago 6
look at that wing flex
backintack 1 year ago 3
I have to admit, though I didn't see the big deal when Boeing announced the 787 it is a very...majestic looking aircraft, the way the wings curve during flight.
RK1Hatty 1 year ago
humi am wearing red undies lol don't ask meh why i am telling you this
CareeLamberte4 1 year ago
rough landing much?
SpartanW98 1 year ago
@SpartanW98 How was that rough? To me that was pretty smooth! lol
1matt63 1 year ago
load!
drybones253 1 year ago
WHAT a Touchdown amazing soft^^
maybe a bit late but SOft
reverent1993 1 year ago
What was that thing hanging out from the tail?? It might have been a remote airspeed sensing device of some time, in order to see how accurately the onboard instruments were reporting actual fying conditions. That's just a guess!!! The plane seems to have a lot of dihedral in the wings!!! Pretty bird!
MrColorfulcat 1 year ago
@MrColorfulcat
It measures static pressure. I think this to allow them to calibrate the instruments to what will be the permanent static source on the aircraft in the future.
jizzmonger 1 year ago
AircraftCompare DOTcom provides exact details of around every aircraft in the world from the past present to the FUTURE FLYING CARS, with photos specs price and everything else. Compare side by side the Boeing 747 and the Airbus A380 or the MIG with the F16 etc, get access to category wise airplane and helicopter rankings, meet the prominent figures from the aerospace industry through the community..
dumpyku 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
was hoping it would crash
davewave57 1 year ago
THIS IS A PLANE! OMG!
Mateusey 1 year ago
what was that little thing hanging out from the tail ?
nzthunderboy 2 years ago 2
@nzthunderboy its a HF radio antenna
iitool 2 years ago 2
The thing coming out of the tail is special sensor used for measuring certain wind and a pressure perimeters. It's only used for test flights.
Alexgeo4975 1 year ago
Beautiful!!!
ihsanfauzi 2 years ago
I was there!!!
jacob6102 2 years ago
0:43 seems unsteady at this point. There is low wind...the lights could be on cause of dense fog and visibilty issue. The landing looks like normal landing noticing an effort to keep the nose down 1:23. 1:33 the nose comes back up routinely. Other than that it maintaines a level landing.
BlackStoneFAA 2 years ago
its called flying a visual approach dude... its not going to be perfect, I didnt notice anything out of the ordinary when flying VFR. im sure boing remembered to install a trim tab, the bobbing of the nose is just standerd minor adjustments to the approach, again nothing abnormal, that was a beutiful approach, and landing.
C2dltCAP 2 years ago
Very nice airplane
ilike 787
youmsx 2 years ago
airbus is a boing made in taiwan
niiiicco 2 years ago
no the 787 is a mid size it will replace the aging 767 and 757 and in some cases the 737
Elios0000 2 years ago
it wont replace the 737 thats for sure but your right about the 767 and 757. The 737 is in a different market all together.
Zreik20 2 years ago
Airbus is nice! Nothing beats (Boeing)..
1MasonDePriest2 2 years ago
great work boeings, I think they'll do better than the Airbus :)
sideslide23 2 years ago 2
Perfect landing!!
francovance1 2 years ago
What's the sey plane 787!!!!!
GeraldKong2009 2 years ago
cant wait to see her in ANA's livery
marco78910 2 years ago
@marco78910 they already have some in ANA livery go to newairplane(dot)com and look at the gallery
ArmyofSeaturtles 2 years ago
We do that kind of weird stuff in the dorms too!
cameroncarina37 2 years ago
Plenty of Wing 'flex' on this near empty newpin - good luck in the stormy weather.
transeuropa 2 years ago
BRAVO!
ro7477 2 years ago
why would they test it out on a rainy day?!?!?
Anarchystars 2 years ago
WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK
marsape 2 years ago
you copied that of con air the film
ljmfilms 2 years ago
type in "Nathan hooper" into youtube. funnies video ever!! soo good
its the first one
guymanpigt646 2 years ago
amazing
kelok21 2 years ago
Boeing doing what it does best. Creating beautiful planes
Fordgirl 2 years ago
Airbus all the way :P
Tommiclio 2 years ago
LOL no, no, no. Boeing forever
Fordgirl 2 years ago
Well you say that.....I mean...wheres Boeing's concord ?
Sure they have some nice planes....but....Air Bus for me... Air Bus and Rolls engines...although GE are good too :)
Tommiclio 2 years ago
The archives most likely :)
Nooooo, Boeing have beautiful planes. She's not called Queen of the Skies because she's ugly. The 747 is a classically elegant design of which Boeing have been good at for a very long time.
Boeing and Rolls :)
Fordgirl 2 years ago
I look at the aesthetic between Boeing and Airbus comparable to the automobiles- different people have different preferences. There is certainly no other plane like the 747. The 787 is elegant and sleek but not radically different from say an A330, a beauty in its own. You can tell i'm a bit of an airliner geek, can't you?
onnomon 2 years ago
@onnomon I agree but compare the 747 to the hideously ugly a380! Boeings have always tended to be more aesthetically pleasing and this is another example.
CloudSurferUK 2 years ago 2
Good ol' European engineering can't be beaten. Airbus for me
STFCcreamemlads 2 years ago
TheerIsEre, the 787 will change passenger airplanes. Too much awesomeness to post it all here. It's called the "dreamliner" for a reason. Google it.
On another note, this is one sexy plane. Love the curved wings. Very nice!
MisterGreenGuy 2 years ago
smooth landing who knows whenqantas is gettin there 787
tylerboyd11 2 years ago
whats so special bout this plane?
TheerIsEre 2 years ago
which 787 is that one? -300 or -800?
Necrommancer 2 years ago
It's the 787-800.
hobbseltoff 2 years ago
amazing landing
1234567loading 2 years ago
love the wings supberb,flaps 10 .
licadapuss 2 years ago
Super Smooth Landing!
36hunters 2 years ago 2
I dont know if I would trust that plane tbh. Did you see the bend in the wings?
STFCcreamemlads 2 years ago
@STFCcreamemlads Did you ever see an Antonov 124? Now there's bend, but they don't fall off!
goldieken 2 years ago
It's designed that way. It has been proven that more rigid wings have a greater susceptibility to damage.
hobbseltoff 2 years ago
I know that you need some flexibility to avoid the wings snapping, but (just my opinion) that looks like too much really
STFCcreamemlads 2 years ago
@STFCcreamemlads I believe the highly swept wings are a new method for economic flying? i think, prove me if im wrong, but i think i remember reading somewhere that it improves fuel efficiency during all aspects of flight.
HanGookBoi 2 years ago
Oh ok, makes sense. Cheers
STFCcreamemlads 2 years ago
its the design.... have you seen how much the a330s and a340's flex?
jesuistahmid 2 years ago
The new 747 is getting those sweptback wings; they are the future and the new A350, Airbus's late, late entry to compete with the 787 is getting them too.
antinotis 2 years ago
A new 747? Wow, do you know if they are going to redesign and try to get the largest commercial airliner record back? I hope so, I'd quite like to see what they do
STFCcreamemlads 2 years ago
@STFCcreamemlads yup its called the 747-8 they use some huge ge engines twice as tall as a normal person
airplaneman121 2 years ago
no.. they were aiming to improve the 747.. they just stretch it a bit more added more fuel efficient wings and engines.
jesuistahmid 2 years ago
very smooth touchdown! whew!
such a beautiful and graceful airplane
SpaceAudio 2 years ago
Fuck look at the bow in the wing tips
Ahoope07 2 years ago
is this plane ther already for fsx??
dordboy1 2 years ago
god..such massive engines..!! great Landing too
amitverma2000 2 years ago
Nice day for a flight, also enjoy the weather at Seattle...
Excalibur322 2 years ago
omg that boing flies nice
tubester4567 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
__read this__________________
lockerz(dot)com is a site where you can gather ptz points by answering ,playing or simply logging in to your free account ,with these points you can redeem some valuable prizes(like ipods,ps3,macbook,etc)..PM me((your email)) here in youtube if you are interested and i will instantly send you an invetation.. you cant join unless your invited from a member,sign quick and save up some ptz before it fully launches
dihsh 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
__read this__________________
lockerz(dot)com is a site where you can gather ptz points by answering ,playing or simply logging in to your free account ,with these points you can redeem some valuable prizes(like ipods,ps3,macbook,etc)..PM me((your email)) here in youtube if you are interested and i will instantly send you an invetation.. you cant join unless your invited from a member,sign quick and save up some ptz before it fully launches
dihsh 2 years ago
If it aint boeing, i aint going.
mithat87 2 years ago
don't like the window wipers......lol
reaperrowledge 2 years ago
nice landing, such a beautiful plane
shishengsun 2 years ago 2
Is it a bird? Is it a plane? NO, it's a Boeing!
bombaclaat 2 years ago
such beauty
Pilotsofer 2 years ago
YO this is the shit all i got to say is A350 just bring it BOEING FOR LIFE!
skbenergy 2 years ago
Hey guys why does the engine cover open up when landing on @1:41 ?? is it for noise reduction?
mjeed21 2 years ago
That's the thrust reversers in action. It helps slow the aircraft down when it's on the runway
speedymousey 2 years ago 2
LOL, you were faster with a few seconds then me, but we both answered to mjeed21's question :))))
neutrino006 2 years ago
no, it is used for reverse a part of a jet to increase the breaks efficiency.
neutrino006 2 years ago
I wanted to say that :-( , also old engine's on other planes had just a flap, this one looks much better :-)
PerfectHD 2 years ago 2
maybe he meant on MS flight simulator
bkamper9 2 years ago
matter of fact the wings of the A 380 are made in wales
eldairado 2 years ago
It looks the size of a 767-300 with 777-200 wings
gaguy1967 2 years ago
you are comparing the b777 to the a300? are you nuts? the boeing is almost 20 years newer.
BratSimpson 2 years ago
I've flown both Airbus and Boeing planes for Virgin Atlantic for nearly 7 years folks. There is simply no comparison. The 747, 777 simply outperform the Airbus A380 and A300. Boeing has been doing it longer and better for decades now and it will take decades more (if ever) for Airbus to achieve anything close to what Boeing engineers have done. The 787 set the bar a tad higher today and in fine fashion i might add!
Ree109 2 years ago
I call that a big pile of steaming bullshit.
If you were a pilot, you'd know that despite some design philosophies that one may or may not like, Airbus a/c are every bit as good as boeing aircraft on a performance standpoint. They have a 50:50 market share for a reason.
Your profile doesn't seem like that of a pilot at all, and it says you are 24yrs old. So you fly long haul with Virgin Atlantic since your 17? ROFL.
Fucking liar.
Good job perpetuating this silly and irrational A vs B thing.
Sha1tan 2 years ago
Virgin never flew 777s or A300s, the only airbus jets they fly or will fly are the A340, A330 (on order) and the A380 (on order). They also fly the 747 from boeing.
dru4m 2 years ago
LOL ROFL someone flys Flight Simulator way too much "bench pilot"! LOL I agree with Sha1tan
fritschep505 2 years ago
first flight and first landing with gear problems already....???are they sure they want to compete Airbus A350..??
cruxader27 2 years ago
They didn't have landing gear problems, they intentionally flew gear down the entire flight.
hobbseltoff 2 years ago
love the fact that everytime something good for aviation happens it turns into a A vs B fight. you're ruining it for yourselves.
well done boeing :) she's a beauty
airboeingbus 2 years ago
airboeingbus, I agree with you 100%. There's always gotta be someone to fire up an argument. I'm American, and I was excited to see the A380 fly it's maiden flight a while back. We will use technologies from others' studies, as they will use ours. Thats the way it works...
70HeavyChevy 2 years ago 3
70HeavyChevy your comment must be smartest one of 400 I have read so far!
PaLx78 2 years ago
Agreed, true aviation fans enjoy great aircraft no matter who builds them.
dru4m 2 years ago
nice wing flex
anthonyyu521 2 years ago
I just wonder how much the wings will flex when fully loaded.........Might scare the passengers to look out and see the wingtip 10 feet over the top of the fueslage and consider that normal
5379bobmartin 2 years ago
LOL, I can't wait to see what the wings look like when fully loaded while flying!
cjracer1000 2 years ago
It is a beautiful aircraft and to see it flying is like watching a graceful bird soaring on the wind. Can't wait to have the chance to fly on it someday :-)
t3po3 2 years ago
ill be flying it one day
crawdaddy1819 2 years ago
The curvature of the wing and the flex is nothing new on this bird...The wings of the 777 are dead stiff compared to the A330...this is the first Boeing aircraft to have true wing flex. The A380 wing is designed for high efficiency for its weight....in its class, it is far more efficient than anything flying, but the 787 has different requirements...like comparing apples with oranges.
Willoz269 2 years ago
The 787 is the first Boeing to have true wing flex??? You can't be serious...and please don't try and compare the super-efficient wing of the 777 with that of the pathetic A330/340 series aircraft. I love your quote about the A380 wing being designed for high efficiency, no seriously...and why would Airbus want that? Geez, thank you Mr. Obvious.
quazimutato 2 years ago
Go back to school kid....or when your Mummy lets you go and look at the first series 777, go compare with the 330 and tell me about wing flex. As for the A380...the inbuilt curves on the gull wing root make it need less speed on approach than a 747...horses for courses....ask your teacher at school to explain that to you.
Willoz269 2 years ago
Actually the 787 is a lot more fuel efficient than the A380. Transportation fuel efficiency is typically measured in the amount fuel (in liters) to transport one passenger 100 kilometers. The A380 is stated to be able to achieve 2.9 L/100 km per passenger while the 787 can achieve 2.4 L/100 km per passenger meaning it could save over 1500 gallons of fuel on a typical flight from KJFK to EGLL.
hobbseltoff 2 years ago
@hobbseltoff you're comparing two different types of aircraft..the a380 is a FULL double decker which weighs way more than the 787 which is obvious.. it's like comparing the fuel efficiency of a 757 and a 747..the fact that the a380 wastes .5L/100 KM more than the 787 is awesome for an aircraft of its size..
europeanwonder2 1 year ago
yeah it probably still has the standard 18" wide seats and no leg room to speak of
5379bobmartin 2 years ago
Actually no it doesn't. The Boeing museum in Everett has a mock-up of what the interior will be like and due to some major changes (most notable being the flat walls) the cabin will be a lot more roomy.
hobbseltoff 2 years ago
@hobbseltoff Meh, Airlines will have their choice of what they want in the interior and they will most likely go with a traditional accomidations with a 3 class configuration.
RainbowManification 1 year ago
oh airbus, eat your heart out.
the wings of the 787 are curved. am in love with this aircraft
Ikembembe 2 years ago
Umm, aren't the wings on the A380 just as curved?
dru4m 2 years ago
these are better cause they are american and not french
crawdaddy1819 2 years ago
Fine, but give them some credit. Americans laughed in the 60s when they said they wanted to build jets to rival boeing & they have by pioneering a lot of stuff including, fly by wire, increased use of composites, health management systems etc. they do great work.
By the way airbus wings are made in the UK not France, their wings are British like the engines powering the 787 today & every airbus jet has a lot of stuff made in the USA in it, we can take pride in that.
dru4m 2 years ago
no i dont think so. the A380 wings does not flex like this. all pictures i have seen of the A380 was a stiff wing supporting two heavy engines. the curvature of the 787 wing is distinctive and so i s the curvature on the 747-8i. boeing seriously needs to speed up development on the 777NG to stop the A350-900 dead in its tracks.
Ikembembe 2 years ago
Watch some videos of A380, on landing you'll see the significant wing droop after the spoilers are deployed, on take-of as speed builds, those "gull" wings rise significantly. The A380s wing spars & some of the skin are carbon fibre & other composites u know. As for the 777 (perhaps my fav jet), boeing will need a new aircraft to compete especialy for the 772 market if airbus builds the A350 as well as the A380, the A350 & 787 are next gen, older models will struggle to compete with them.
dru4m 2 years ago
Here's a great example of the flex you're talking about. Video X9YMXFkToac is a Quantas A380 landing.
Watch how much the wing flexes DOWNwards when she lands. I certainly wouldn't call it a "stiff wing." It's just that when the Airbus lifts off, the wings move into "neutral position" while the 787 flies with an upward flex.
They are both beautiful aircraft and both multinational efforts, so many different nations can be proud of recent aviation.
athaker 2 years ago
Agreed, though I wouldn't say they move into neutral, they flex up, with a span that long they have to flex a great deal. Any way you put it though, these are beautiful aircraft, its a great time for aviation fans, next stop the 747-8 and A350!
dru4m 2 years ago
Wonderful Achievement and great looking plane and landing!! Congrats Boeing!!
Lilybro2806 2 years ago
Can't wait to see this beauty in regular airline service!
MrCunob 2 years ago 2
where ddi it fly for 3 hours? around?
777janek 2 years ago
they hopped up to YVR and picked up some good beer and tickets to the Olympics!
JohnyCanuck796 2 years ago
beautiful! amazing winflex both and takeoff and landing~!
777janek 2 years ago
what program did you use?
paivinha95 2 years ago
Comment removed
danlewis2344 2 years ago
It's form the Boeing website
danlewis2344 2 years ago
great plane nice landing
willmac1967 2 years ago
Thanks for uploading hobbseltoff. Nice landing. The landing gear (Messier-Dowty) and Engines (Rolls Royce) worked a treat. Well done to all involved!
tegoarcanadei 2 years ago
amazing wingflex
hamburgerjungs 2 years ago 4
Beautiful one :))
Chudy22 2 years ago
Great landing!
Karebear38 2 years ago
NICE!
raazmatazz94 2 years ago
i missed, thanks for uploading it. :)
briaproductions 2 years ago
No problem, I'm getting pretty good at this; I had this video up before it finished taxiing.
hobbseltoff 2 years ago
BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yankeesfan135 2 years ago 4