Else how do unemployed people ever become involved in production ever again? Production initiates. Say's Law is a statement of reality. There are geniuses who can't understand this. Be better than a genius. So: 0 demand for a product doesn't stop you producing other products. No demand for products makes future-oriented production. Deferred finalisation of production period.
Unemployment comes from low demand for the products of employment. The products of employment come from...employment. Hm, there appears to be a slight confusion here Mr Keynes.
Could it be that production enables consumption, and not the other way around (so that 0 consumption does not inhibit further production nor eventual profits to motivate such production as an extreme version of extending capital structures)?
Now you understand that Say's Law=statement of reality. Production initiates
Unemployment comes from low demand for the products of employment.=Wrong
Cessation of a job (a job contingent on there being demand for its product) does not equal unemployment. There not being demand for product x, or indeed for all conceivable products, does not make all production of new products or products to be sold when there is demand (since 0 demand means; now, and future temporal quality makes the product inherently different) therefore 0 demand for commodities can have 100% emplymnt
Now this means that Keynes presumed that growth and the capacity for employment (in production for that growth) relied on private consumption. Yet recessions are a problem of malco-ordinated investment that needs to liquidate, not lack of consumption. Indeed consumption is not required for full employment. Consider the logical fallacy at the bottom of Keynesianism that was refuted by JB Say 200 years ago:
Everything Schiff says=common sense that Keynes attempted to refute in the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Keynes' idea was that government growth, higher tax, higher spending, protection of banks who printed money in excess of specie reserves (now they have no deficit of specie because the notes are iredeemable in gold, well let's see how iredeemable they are when we keep buying gold with the progressively worthless notes) WOULDN'T come at expense IF prvt consumption fell.
@aviomaster i wouldn't be surprised if this happens. Peter is speaking the truth to a corrupt government with its back against the wall right now. no amount of "stimulus" will jump start the economy without savings. by the way, his father who refused to pay income tax on the obvious principle is already in jail right now.
The only problem with peter schiff is that he endorses himself, he shouldn't do that - just stick to the issues and let people hear and decide if they want him as their senator - he shouldn't tell voters why they need to vote for him, it sounds a bit selfish.
Peter's been practicing, he's getting much better at compressing his thoughts and addressing one issue at a time, being concise and clear. I don't know what the other candidate's answers were but I don't see how they can come close to Peter's
I don't think the audience got the whole dose of Peter's message under the time restrictions. To get the whole message, you have to let him rant. It sounds boring in type, but I could listen to Peter bash the government all day long. He has a solid answer on just about every single issue you can ever think of.
It seems like we have a bunch good candidates running for this office, but Peter Schiff is the best candidate. McMahon and Simmons should just step down and back Peter Schiff. Then they can run in the next election.
I agree with some of the other commenters. Please post the other candidates opening speeches & their answers to the questions if you have them. It would really be helpful to get an idea as to how the other candidates compare. My guess is that Peter outshines them, but would like to see for myself. Thanks!
I've listened to both Linda McMahon and Rob Simmons on YouTube and realized that Peter should win by a landslide. Both Linda and Rob talk about key boring republican phases of today like Business as usual and throwing gasoline on the fire. They are stiff, unimaginative and phony. If CT doesn't vote for Peter, it's because they have not listened to each candidate.
Does anyone else find it amusing that even on the Linda McMahon and Rob Simmons page, all the comments are "Peter Schiff for Senate"? If this were a national election, he'd be killing them. Come on Connecticut, wake up!
its not what you stand for, its what you are able to pass. that is why ron paul has been, is, and always will be ineffective - hes not part of the "establishment" and is a political outcast - he cannot get things done in washington.
rofl.. before anyone actually emerges willing to waste time with you, actually that argument itself is quite pathetic before we get to a debate. even mainstream neo conservative hosts like sean hannity, newt gingrich and a few other establishment figures have stated again and again the republicans lost america's trust because of their inability to maintain their principles just about every day on evening news. it's quite pathetic when you're even more backward than republican establishment.
you wrote more than me therefore you've already wasted more time. its not an argument you dodo, its reality. ron paul got what % of the vote in the republican primaries? that is a fact, not any argument.
and what makes you think that someone is willing to waste time to debate a cretin like you?
He's got people running for office in every state on his principles, and that's a far greater accomplishment than passing any legislation. The idea is to spread the message, and get like-minded people alongside you so that you can then begin repealing and taking back our government.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
firstly, thats complete BS. people in other states are not running on his principles. and even if their platform says they are, once they get into office, they will either become part of the system or they will be purged or sidelined.
nothing stops the machine. especially not some little piss ant like peter schiff with no money, no corporate sponsors, no military support and no political connections.
'grassroots' haha - yes, you people will be eating grass and roots pretty soon.
Oh, it's complete BS because you say it is, right? You're no authority on anything. You're simply some scrub behind a keyboard who likes to argue on YouTube to get his social fix since nobody will listen to you in real life.
For the record, Schiff is a multi-millionaire, has raised well over a million, and has pledged a million or two of his own disposable income. Look at Debra Medina once the debates started in Texas, went from 4% to 24% in the polls, and she only has $600,000.
a million? wow, maybe dr.evil would like that for a ransom, haha. a million bucks will pay for one party for high fliers, with nothing to spare. that sort of chump change will buy him a janitor position in washington.
sorry, but people pay for my advice in real life @US$9,500 per day. so the message stays the same for you - get used to eating grass and roots, peasant.
Get used to still being a douche... well take that back, you must already be used to it. I'd assume one of 2 pasts... either A, you were the jack ass jock in High School, who never really felt like one of the cool kids, but did douchey stuff anyways to impress the other douches... or B, you were the smart kid who got picked on by the Jocks, went out, got a huge ego from all that over-achieving, and in the end, became even Douchier than the Jocks who used to make your life a living hell... Ass
And, people pay $9,501 per day for my advice in real life.
The typical senate seat costs 8 to 10 million, and Peter Schiff, once the debates kick in, will close that gap. Doesn't mean he will win, but he will poll higher as things progress and folks find out who he is, Mr. YouTube Warrior.
I wish I was living in Connecticut again so I could Vote for Peter Schiff. To make up for that I am donating to The Peter Schiff Campain. I recommend that all of us nationwide get behind Peter Schiff and donate to his campain like i do. We definately need Peter to bring common sence to Government
peters idea about the employers tax free insurance, is golden. if he can keep explaining to the citizens in CT about these cost free ideas, common sense ideas, then they will vote for schiff. because linda and simmons don't have these economic plans, because they don't know a thing about economics and the u.s. economy. so schiff can win if he keeps bringing up the common sense economic ideas to save americans money and will grow our economy.
Funny, McMahon is holding her ear like a student needing to listen deeply to learn something, and Simmons is as stiff and brittle as a salty pretzel.
I would have liked to listen to all three, which also would have strengthened and enhanced all of Peter´s aces even more. Plus those CT citizens watching on youtube also get a chance to judge for themselves.
If Simmons and McMahon actually cared about the country they would drop out. Nothing against them, we just need someone who actually has a difference of opinion in the Republican party. We need someone who actually understands economics besides Ron Paul.
I agree, and know exactly what you mean, without wanting to offend the other two candidates.
After all, Peter said he will only serve for one term. The other two can wait six more years. It would give them time, if they still desire to serve in the Senate (and be GOOD at it), to learn about the issues in depth and make a serious run for office.
This is the first time I've heard Peter give some detail on why we need to save instead of spend. When you save your money in a bank or such, it is lent out to build up capital elsewhere. This increases productivity, increases jobs and greatly increases prosperity in the long run. The same things the government is TRYING to do by increasing debt, printing money and raising taxes.
government needs to either eliminate the fed reserve and let the market define rate of interest. OR the fed needs to raise interest rates dramatically to allow savings to occur. nobody is going to save when interest rates are near zero.
Simmons is slime and represents the problems in the Republican party and Washington as a whole which are destroying this country. He will pull every trick he can to win. Don't trust him.
Linda is a person who has gotten rich by staging fake wrestling matches were grown men act like monkeys, put on costumes, and wear makeup. She has no idea how to fix this country, no knowledge of economics or political theory and she knows it.
Peter Schiff is what this country needs - a real leader.
Peter had the only solution for healthcare previously but this theory as many future problems with it regarding the honesty of employers offering the tax free money. The best solutions I heard is #1 Tort Reform (a must to lower healthcare costs), #2 health insurance portability across state lines (more competition amongst insurance carriers), and #3 Taking doctors off the payroll of insurance and keep insurance exclusively for major catastrophies (this will force doctors to lower their rates).
I went on YT to see Linda's and Rob's responses. You didn't miss anything, but it would have been really great to see the whole thing unedited on Peter's Channel because it really makes him stand out and shine.
The other candidates are listening to Schiff thinking "holy shit, what did i get myself into??" haha. Peter Schiff understands the economy, these other fools are just here for the political game.
The time constraints really don't do Peter justice - really have to watch some previous videos to understand where he is coming from!
Its really funny, Linda is trying to be the next Palin while Rob shuffles papers the whole time. If you don't know what to say, then you better get out of politics!
I have been following Peter for years and if he gets in the debates it is game over!
youtube is the best thing that ever happened to Politics - now you know who is actually full of shit!
Because the neocon Simmons knows that Peter is telling the sheeple the truth. Simmons is afraid that Peter will wake people up from the matrix of the corrupt progressive 2 party globalist system.
It was cool seeing all 3 on stage together. I have been wanting to see how Linda and Rob react when Peter speaks and talks of the problems and common sense solutions for our economy. It will be interesting to see if one or both of them start of them start to tell people they have ideas that will avoid the pain Peter says is coming as a counter to Schiff's message that we have to face our mistakes now or go thru a dollar crisis
I love anyone who believes in The Constitution such as Rand Paul (but personally I think he's got it in the bag), although people like Schiff and Debra in Texas really need contributions if you can.
Why on earth did you cut out Linda and Rob's responses? You should give us the whole presentation. This really is incomplete to just show Peter. I was really interested in seeing the whole presentation.
well i do have a small desire to do the same somewhat, but i realize this channel is probably managed by campaign staffers that actually cost peter money, so i would expect and forgive a certain degree of bias.
Else how do unemployed people ever become involved in production ever again? Production initiates. Say's Law is a statement of reality. There are geniuses who can't understand this. Be better than a genius. So: 0 demand for a product doesn't stop you producing other products. No demand for products makes future-oriented production. Deferred finalisation of production period.
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
Unemployment comes from low demand for the products of employment. The products of employment come from...employment. Hm, there appears to be a slight confusion here Mr Keynes.
Could it be that production enables consumption, and not the other way around (so that 0 consumption does not inhibit further production nor eventual profits to motivate such production as an extreme version of extending capital structures)?
Now you understand that Say's Law=statement of reality. Production initiates
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
Unemployment comes from low demand for the products of employment.=Wrong
Cessation of a job (a job contingent on there being demand for its product) does not equal unemployment. There not being demand for product x, or indeed for all conceivable products, does not make all production of new products or products to be sold when there is demand (since 0 demand means; now, and future temporal quality makes the product inherently different) therefore 0 demand for commodities can have 100% emplymnt
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
Now this means that Keynes presumed that growth and the capacity for employment (in production for that growth) relied on private consumption. Yet recessions are a problem of malco-ordinated investment that needs to liquidate, not lack of consumption. Indeed consumption is not required for full employment. Consider the logical fallacy at the bottom of Keynesianism that was refuted by JB Say 200 years ago:
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
Everything Schiff says=common sense that Keynes attempted to refute in the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Keynes' idea was that government growth, higher tax, higher spending, protection of banks who printed money in excess of specie reserves (now they have no deficit of specie because the notes are iredeemable in gold, well let's see how iredeemable they are when we keep buying gold with the progressively worthless notes) WOULDN'T come at expense IF prvt consumption fell.
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
I expect Peter Shiff if he continues to speak like this ... He will be assasinated or sent to prison.
aviomaster 1 year ago
@aviomaster i wouldn't be surprised if this happens. Peter is speaking the truth to a corrupt government with its back against the wall right now. no amount of "stimulus" will jump start the economy without savings. by the way, his father who refused to pay income tax on the obvious principle is already in jail right now.
Rawego 1 year ago
This is awesome. Go Schiff!
aretlev 1 year ago
Linda looks real nervous when Schiff starts talking about spending less money. haha!
johnidavey 1 year ago
Daaaaamn Canton. This Peter Schiff looks like he'll give you a run for your money. Linda.... ehhh.
Wow... he's actually saying something lol.
Like a libertarian in drag.
Why is this happning in the school auditorium?
Why are so many people so dumb?
He's like a psuedo Ron Paul.
Whatever... have plenty
medici101 2 years ago
I Love You Peter אלוהים יברך אותך
elieakaMrextreme 2 years ago
@ 7:55
haha, sneeze!
Organjic 2 years ago
Schiff for President 2012
urdaddy4321 2 years ago
Schiff or Ron Paul or Rand Paul for president.
dont forget there are others like peter schiff (ron paul and rand paul).
hyylo 1 year ago
You can see the look on McMahon and Simmon's faces when Peter is talking. A look along the lines of "Oh shit!".
Thrice13 2 years ago 5
Hes almost got it hes close
Crucafixxx 2 years ago
I hope Peter Schiff doesn't get lung cancer because he just smoked Linda and Rob in that debate. I don't even need to see the rest of it!!
spernoadversa 2 years ago 6
awesome baby!
RDpapichulo 2 years ago
i love how the establishment puts peter schiff in the middle. he is not to be heard first nor last. HE SHOULD BE HEARD LAST EVERYWHERE HE SPEAKS.
We should hear the nimwits and then peter talking sense into them. That way people who came late can hear too.
tirmen8er 2 years ago 2
Schiff should be the next senator of Conn.
spernoadversa 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
07kman 2 years ago
Anyone have a link to the whole debate? I would like to hear the responses of Linda and Rob in order to compare them with Peter's.
07kman 2 years ago
@07kman
I'd bet that its boring, scripted, and the same ol.
Mann, it would be awesome to see Peter up there on the main stage of a Senate debate.
at1212b 2 years ago
The only problem with peter schiff is that he endorses himself, he shouldn't do that - just stick to the issues and let people hear and decide if they want him as their senator - he shouldn't tell voters why they need to vote for him, it sounds a bit selfish.
Wcoltd 2 years ago
what ws the feedback from most of the people who attended this event? Did Peter do well in their eyes...? what is the allure of the WWE lady?
ChristiansMustLearn 2 years ago
Why such a small crowd?
frank1600 2 years ago
@frank1600 I think this was when they got all the snow in the Northeast.
1972challenger 2 years ago
@frank1600
The Election is more then half a year ahead. It will get more busy with time
zUkUnFtsBeAt 2 years ago
Peter's been practicing, he's getting much better at compressing his thoughts and addressing one issue at a time, being concise and clear. I don't know what the other candidate's answers were but I don't see how they can come close to Peter's
chrrrr 2 years ago
I really wonder what Linda is thinking during Peter's answers.
chrrrr 2 years ago
@chrrrr SHE'S THINKING DAMN, THIS GUY IS SERIOUS
RDpapichulo 2 years ago
I don't think the audience got the whole dose of Peter's message under the time restrictions. To get the whole message, you have to let him rant. It sounds boring in type, but I could listen to Peter bash the government all day long. He has a solid answer on just about every single issue you can ever think of.
wachman 2 years ago 6
I like Schiff's insight. He's dead on.
1beinki 2 years ago
Peter owned them!
kobe88124 2 years ago
go to PALINSMITH's channel and you'll find the entire town hall to compare.
jyeah12 2 years ago
It seems like we have a bunch good candidates running for this office, but Peter Schiff is the best candidate. McMahon and Simmons should just step down and back Peter Schiff. Then they can run in the next election.
JesusIsMyHomeDogg 2 years ago
im glad to see linda clap for peter schiff, maybe she'll see him as a better candidate and step down. And then theres no stopping peter.
DickeyRogers 2 years ago
woot! that was great.
nice to finally see him sitting between those two too.
subuey 2 years ago
peter's current support is like < 10% not even listed on the official website...
akathetruthteller 2 years ago
I agree with some of the other commenters. Please post the other candidates opening speeches & their answers to the questions if you have them. It would really be helpful to get an idea as to how the other candidates compare. My guess is that Peter outshines them, but would like to see for myself. Thanks!
mikef8080 2 years ago
that was incredible
spiggitybap 2 years ago
Peter will win this.
Vunks2000 2 years ago
Peter Schiff is on fire. He will win.
misternormL 2 years ago
I've listened to both Linda McMahon and Rob Simmons on YouTube and realized that Peter should win by a landslide. Both Linda and Rob talk about key boring republican phases of today like Business as usual and throwing gasoline on the fire. They are stiff, unimaginative and phony. If CT doesn't vote for Peter, it's because they have not listened to each candidate.
rayme4raw 2 years ago
Does anyone else find it amusing that even on the Linda McMahon and Rob Simmons page, all the comments are "Peter Schiff for Senate"? If this were a national election, he'd be killing them. Come on Connecticut, wake up!
MikeAnderson97 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hes dead last in the race just like ron paul was dead last in the national republican nomination for the presidency.
i think you need to wake up to the fact that these two losers will never make it.
trinomialtree 2 years ago
@trinomialtree I would imagine that the candidate you want to win, Rob Simmons or Linda McMahon, actually stands for something, right?
GOP1776 2 years ago
its not what you stand for, its what you are able to pass. that is why ron paul has been, is, and always will be ineffective - hes not part of the "establishment" and is a political outcast - he cannot get things done in washington.
if you smell what the rock is cooking~~~
trinomialtree 2 years ago
rofl.. before anyone actually emerges willing to waste time with you, actually that argument itself is quite pathetic before we get to a debate. even mainstream neo conservative hosts like sean hannity, newt gingrich and a few other establishment figures have stated again and again the republicans lost america's trust because of their inability to maintain their principles just about every day on evening news. it's quite pathetic when you're even more backward than republican establishment.
spyletu 2 years ago
you should look up what neoconservative means before using it
wpw232 2 years ago
you wrote more than me therefore you've already wasted more time. its not an argument you dodo, its reality. ron paul got what % of the vote in the republican primaries? that is a fact, not any argument.
and what makes you think that someone is willing to waste time to debate a cretin like you?
trinomialtree 2 years ago
@trinomialtree
He's got people running for office in every state on his principles, and that's a far greater accomplishment than passing any legislation. The idea is to spread the message, and get like-minded people alongside you so that you can then begin repealing and taking back our government.
nidhogge 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
firstly, thats complete BS. people in other states are not running on his principles. and even if their platform says they are, once they get into office, they will either become part of the system or they will be purged or sidelined.
nothing stops the machine. especially not some little piss ant like peter schiff with no money, no corporate sponsors, no military support and no political connections.
'grassroots' haha - yes, you people will be eating grass and roots pretty soon.
trinomialtree 2 years ago
Oh, it's complete BS because you say it is, right? You're no authority on anything. You're simply some scrub behind a keyboard who likes to argue on YouTube to get his social fix since nobody will listen to you in real life.
For the record, Schiff is a multi-millionaire, has raised well over a million, and has pledged a million or two of his own disposable income. Look at Debra Medina once the debates started in Texas, went from 4% to 24% in the polls, and she only has $600,000.
nidhogge 2 years ago
a million? wow, maybe dr.evil would like that for a ransom, haha. a million bucks will pay for one party for high fliers, with nothing to spare. that sort of chump change will buy him a janitor position in washington.
sorry, but people pay for my advice in real life @US$9,500 per day. so the message stays the same for you - get used to eating grass and roots, peasant.
trinomialtree 2 years ago
Get used to still being a douche... well take that back, you must already be used to it. I'd assume one of 2 pasts... either A, you were the jack ass jock in High School, who never really felt like one of the cool kids, but did douchey stuff anyways to impress the other douches... or B, you were the smart kid who got picked on by the Jocks, went out, got a huge ego from all that over-achieving, and in the end, became even Douchier than the Jocks who used to make your life a living hell... Ass
Syphalis1 2 years ago
And, people pay $9,501 per day for my advice in real life.
The typical senate seat costs 8 to 10 million, and Peter Schiff, once the debates kick in, will close that gap. Doesn't mean he will win, but he will poll higher as things progress and folks find out who he is, Mr. YouTube Warrior.
nidhogge 2 years ago
sorry, you are a peasant, i hope you will be able to make $9,501 per annum at a wal-mart checkout counter.
trinomialtree 2 years ago
Sorry, you live in your ma and pa's basement. Keep at it Mr. YouTube Warrior, take the internetz by the balls!
nidhogge 2 years ago
I wish I was living in Connecticut again so I could Vote for Peter Schiff. To make up for that I am donating to The Peter Schiff Campain. I recommend that all of us nationwide get behind Peter Schiff and donate to his campain like i do. We definately need Peter to bring common sence to Government
ForexRobotWorldCup 2 years ago
peters idea about the employers tax free insurance, is golden. if he can keep explaining to the citizens in CT about these cost free ideas, common sense ideas, then they will vote for schiff. because linda and simmons don't have these economic plans, because they don't know a thing about economics and the u.s. economy. so schiff can win if he keeps bringing up the common sense economic ideas to save americans money and will grow our economy.
PoliticsAddict 2 years ago
CT please give America Peter Schiff!
happyfacepq 2 years ago 2
Funny, McMahon is holding her ear like a student needing to listen deeply to learn something, and Simmons is as stiff and brittle as a salty pretzel.
I would have liked to listen to all three, which also would have strengthened and enhanced all of Peter´s aces even more. Plus those CT citizens watching on youtube also get a chance to judge for themselves.
SAPHIRA178 2 years ago 2
If Simmons and McMahon actually cared about the country they would drop out. Nothing against them, we just need someone who actually has a difference of opinion in the Republican party. We need someone who actually understands economics besides Ron Paul.
buckey2000 2 years ago 8
I agree, and know exactly what you mean, without wanting to offend the other two candidates.
After all, Peter said he will only serve for one term. The other two can wait six more years. It would give them time, if they still desire to serve in the Senate (and be GOOD at it), to learn about the issues in depth and make a serious run for office.
LastStandforLiberty 2 years ago 2
This is the first time I've heard Peter give some detail on why we need to save instead of spend. When you save your money in a bank or such, it is lent out to build up capital elsewhere. This increases productivity, increases jobs and greatly increases prosperity in the long run. The same things the government is TRYING to do by increasing debt, printing money and raising taxes.
mustang607 2 years ago
government needs to either eliminate the fed reserve and let the market define rate of interest. OR the fed needs to raise interest rates dramatically to allow savings to occur. nobody is going to save when interest rates are near zero.
PoliticsAddict 2 years ago
I love how Simmons has a stack of papers in front of him and Peter just has a bottle of water LOL
sirchilly 2 years ago 12
Simmons is slime and represents the problems in the Republican party and Washington as a whole which are destroying this country. He will pull every trick he can to win. Don't trust him.
Linda is a person who has gotten rich by staging fake wrestling matches were grown men act like monkeys, put on costumes, and wear makeup. She has no idea how to fix this country, no knowledge of economics or political theory and she knows it.
Peter Schiff is what this country needs - a real leader.
chuska8383 2 years ago 8
did this committee only take 30 minutes? Or did the other two get more time than Peter?
Schram1 2 years ago
to those who're about to lecture, we salute ya :)
please vote mr. peter schiff into us senate.
maddies1 2 years ago
Best solution to healthcare I've heard. Peter nails it.
nyfg56 2 years ago 2
Peter had the only solution for healthcare previously but this theory as many future problems with it regarding the honesty of employers offering the tax free money. The best solutions I heard is #1 Tort Reform (a must to lower healthcare costs), #2 health insurance portability across state lines (more competition amongst insurance carriers), and #3 Taking doctors off the payroll of insurance and keep insurance exclusively for major catastrophies (this will force doctors to lower their rates).
residentzombie 2 years ago
i kind of wish this wasnt edited..i want to see the answers of linda and rob too....
adam1trent 2 years ago 2
I went on YT to see Linda's and Rob's responses. You didn't miss anything, but it would have been really great to see the whole thing unedited on Peter's Channel because it really makes him stand out and shine.
rayme4raw 2 years ago
Why such a small crowd?
healthhavencom 2 years ago
Snow? Apathy? The other two candidates were not Peter Schiff.
rayme4raw 2 years ago
The other candidates are listening to Schiff thinking "holy shit, what did i get myself into??" haha. Peter Schiff understands the economy, these other fools are just here for the political game.
Thrice13 2 years ago 6
Nice job, Peter! We need more appearances with the other Republican candidates.
purplepamphleteer 2 years ago 2
The time constraints really don't do Peter justice - really have to watch some previous videos to understand where he is coming from!
Its really funny, Linda is trying to be the next Palin while Rob shuffles papers the whole time. If you don't know what to say, then you better get out of politics!
I have been following Peter for years and if he gets in the debates it is game over!
youtube is the best thing that ever happened to Politics - now you know who is actually full of shit!
bwheeler83 2 years ago 19
Well when and if Peter gets in the Senate he will only be allowed to speak for 3 to 5 minutes. He needs to get used to it.
residentzombie 2 years ago
I love how Rob gets all figity when peter is talking
soundmoneyfan 2 years ago 3
Because the neocon Simmons knows that Peter is telling the sheeple the truth. Simmons is afraid that Peter will wake people up from the matrix of the corrupt progressive 2 party globalist system.
residentzombie 2 years ago 4
That was the funniest part. For a moment there, they both got very still and their faces both went dead.
rayme4raw 2 years ago
I don't live in CT, but I hope you win Peter!
Gbroadcaster 2 years ago
ok, NOW the race begins...
ric0rich 2 years ago
what the heck is that thing linda is wearing? she looks like the queen.
michaelpshipley1 2 years ago
Is this Regis Philbin moderating the town hall? Anyways go Peter!
1972challenger 2 years ago 3
haha
CliveSinclairZX 2 years ago
Peter Schiff for senate 2010!
yushaos 2 years ago 4
Schiff 2010!
twinsrule8907 2 years ago 4
Schiff for Senate!!!
john2knj 2 years ago 5
Way to be CT!!
clemmens14 2 years ago 2
It was cool seeing all 3 on stage together. I have been wanting to see how Linda and Rob react when Peter speaks and talks of the problems and common sense solutions for our economy. It will be interesting to see if one or both of them start of them start to tell people they have ideas that will avoid the pain Peter says is coming as a counter to Schiff's message that we have to face our mistakes now or go thru a dollar crisis
clemmens14 2 years ago 4
wait til morning probably.. Go Pete!
YouSayYouWantA 2 years ago 3
I love anyone who believes in The Constitution such as Rand Paul (but personally I think he's got it in the bag), although people like Schiff and Debra in Texas really need contributions if you can.
Thanks.
shouldlistentoronpau 2 years ago 3
Why on earth did you cut out Linda and Rob's responses? You should give us the whole presentation. This really is incomplete to just show Peter. I was really interested in seeing the whole presentation.
LisaJ4Liberty 2 years ago 4
You should go film it next time, you got something for free and you're complaining?
worldgoingtozero 2 years ago 2
@LisaJ4Liberty They are irrelevant. You will vote for PS anyway, so why waste your time? :)
BlueSkies360 2 years ago 2
very pround of peter schiff. he's the man.
michaelpshipley1 2 years ago 3
well i do have a small desire to do the same somewhat, but i realize this channel is probably managed by campaign staffers that actually cost peter money, so i would expect and forgive a certain degree of bias.
spyletu 2 years ago
Peter Schiff is just brilliant! I can't get enough of him.
thane17 2 years ago 13
Looks like Peter Schiff OWNED!
cowboy219 2 years ago 9
excellent video! could you show the whole town meeting?
jyeah12 2 years ago 8
Schiff 4 senate!
TheChannelOfLiberty 2 years ago 4
If Linda wins, will she get her own theme music and fireworks when she struts into the Senate floor?
takerdust 2 years ago 7
Don't forget to donate a dollar or more to his campaign. I know you can afford that.
elbuggo 2 years ago 5