We had refugies comin to live here years ago brought by the church, the media made a following by first and unique time. .. They were inserted in society, given gov's homes, put in jobs, languange and educational programs etc all of this of course just to start , they were starting from the bottom but with equal opportunities. In the interviews they gave hatting words to us they wanted to start from above. women started to protitute tehmselves, others started using psychological attacks
cont] .. they even when they were appart in different places of our society they gathered together to take advantage of the more kind people.. At the end I think all came back to their country. Now the church still brings refugies, ..constantly.. but you know SSHHH..
This is the problem of the world, this is what the church is Refugies not willing to do right but to take advantage of the kind ones. Why so many people, why all living so close, ..refugies around a kind one. ..enslavement. !!!
1.4 billion people live in extreme poverty, and your solution is for large portions of entire countries not to have children? Can you imagine your whole state being told not to have kids? Poverty is the problem, not people being "idiots." Fewer children per family is good, but that takes strong education and health care systems. Those take countries with economic development and stable, corruption-free governments (and no wars). It also means less debt owed to rich countries like yours.
You forgot to mention what draw backs there are to over population. More child abuse, more disease, greater drain on resources. Increase human stress, increase reduciton of animals, fish.
You're thinking of just finding ways to feed more people when MORE PEOPLE is the root of the problem.
There is nothing wrong with decreasing population through fewer births. Everyone benefits and we get to keep this earth from becoming a waste land.
Last I checked our country was feeding yours; nice eh?
Your country is feeding the United States? Last time I checked, we grow most of our own food. And I didn't say that fewer births is a bad thing at all, just that you don't call entire countries of people "idiots" and tell them not to have babies. Your "solutions" are overly simplistic and out of touch with reality.
We had refugies comin to live here years ago brought by the church, the media made a following by first and unique time. .. They were inserted in society, given gov's homes, put in jobs, languange and educational programs etc all of this of course just to start , they were starting from the bottom but with equal opportunities. In the interviews they gave hatting words to us they wanted to start from above. women started to protitute tehmselves, others started using psychological attacks
paradigmproject1 2 years ago
cont] .. they even when they were appart in different places of our society they gathered together to take advantage of the more kind people.. At the end I think all came back to their country. Now the church still brings refugies, ..constantly.. but you know SSHHH..
This is the problem of the world, this is what the church is Refugies not willing to do right but to take advantage of the kind ones. Why so many people, why all living so close, ..refugies around a kind one. ..enslavement. !!!
paradigmproject1 2 years ago
What about population control? THese people are so poor yet they still bring kids into the world.
That's a form of child abuse. These kids are going to have a bad life and be in danger from their poverty.
Stop having babies you idiots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wetweasel56 2 years ago
1.4 billion people live in extreme poverty, and your solution is for large portions of entire countries not to have children? Can you imagine your whole state being told not to have kids? Poverty is the problem, not people being "idiots." Fewer children per family is good, but that takes strong education and health care systems. Those take countries with economic development and stable, corruption-free governments (and no wars). It also means less debt owed to rich countries like yours.
CrookdRiverWmn 2 years ago
You forgot to mention what draw backs there are to over population. More child abuse, more disease, greater drain on resources. Increase human stress, increase reduciton of animals, fish.
You're thinking of just finding ways to feed more people when MORE PEOPLE is the root of the problem.
There is nothing wrong with decreasing population through fewer births. Everyone benefits and we get to keep this earth from becoming a waste land.
Last I checked our country was feeding yours; nice eh?
wetweasel56 2 years ago
Your country is feeding the United States? Last time I checked, we grow most of our own food. And I didn't say that fewer births is a bad thing at all, just that you don't call entire countries of people "idiots" and tell them not to have babies. Your "solutions" are overly simplistic and out of touch with reality.
CrookdRiverWmn 2 years ago