When to move species struggling with climate change
.
As climate changes make native habitats unlivable to plants and animals, these species have two choices: Leave or go extinct.
Now, researchers are offering guidance on when conservationists should undertake the last-ditch strategy of transplanting struggling species to new habitats.
True Free energy devices exist,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
The story of AL GORE&CARLYLE Group-(S.Frisco)Its called EX PRESIDENTS club(GREENHOUSE-GLOBAL WARMING-CLIMATE CHANGE- GREEN ENERGY-SMART ENERGY)-It's LIE-LIE! Thats why NAME keeps changing like LIES chg! You can call it CAP&TAX-is what it does-Another Globalist Scheme so bunch of corrupt EX-Presidents-like BUSH,RAMOS (Philippians,) MAJOR(Brit,)Al GORE can steal more $BILLIONS from TAXES-(ROMANS taxed WORLD)the GOV. PUPPETS must have$B's to join Ruling Elites vs.FEMA death camps with us PLEBS!.
See folks. SSTTEEAALLTTHH is the typical leftist. He debates a musician whom everyone seems to think should be dumb? Not true in the least. I debate him honestly with facts. After he debates for awhile then i've givin him logical conclusions he calls me a moron and a troll. This is the lefts MO. Especially those on the Global Warming side. It's unfortunante that they WILL NOT LISTEN TO FACTS AND LOGIC!
May i suggest all the dickheads who want to protect their oil go do something productive instead of just looking up 'global warming' or 'al gore' and commenting 'it's a scam' without further evidence on every vid they find.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I do present evidence. You need to look at all my posts. Read AGENDA 21. That will educate you on what is behind it. Politicians, Scientists, and Corporations are benefactors from the agenda. The debate is over. It's not only a scam it's about NWO no question about it
No, you make a classic mistake, you provide conspiracy theories. Show me a proper peer-reviewed article from Nature or the Cell or another scientific magazine. That would be evidence
I didn't say you should post it! What are you, stupid? I said it was bullshit and that it is not evidence. It is a conspiracy theory! Give me a proper peer-reviewed article from a scientific journal which provides data that indicates there is no man-induced climate change. I wouldn't bother searching though, because you are not going to find any. You're basically doing the same thing as questioning evolution.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Garth Paltridge, Visiting Fellow ANU and retired Chief Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired Director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre."There are good and straightforward scientific reasons to believe that the burning of fossil fuel and consequent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide will lead to an increase in the average temperature of the world above that which would otherwise be the case.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I can go on and on and on and on. It's pointless. I have to get the crap out of your head first. You have to first see that there is no GW to see the what is behind it. Sorry, but this is a dead issue. Many like myself who started out concerned about GW, then finding that it was a scam, then studying further to find out what really was going on is about a 2 year process. Any IPCC study that is out is fraudulant and propaganda.
You are going to get crap out of my head? I'm sorry, but what scientific education did you enjoy at which university again? Sorry, but i'll take my chances with my education, my observations and my professors (who have studied for over 10 years post-academically).
Haha, there is no way to have a conversation with a conspiracy theorist. Every evidence I will provide you, you will simply reject as a scam, even though there have been studies, observations and reviews.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Your professors? Let me let you in on a little secret about your professors. They do not have jobs. Anyone, ANYONE who gets paid with a government check is employed by me and the nation. Of course those morons support government take over of everything. All they've ever known was public education. I laugh in the face of professors. I am a musician for a living and the professors that taught? CANT PLAY! I teach their students that have degrees
Here's what i heard: Blablabla, jealous of people with education, blabla conspiracy theory, blabla NWO, blabla crazy, blabla, need to get laid.
Care to throw in some Roswell, Rothshild, Illuminati and other crazy shit?
Hahah a musician? No kidding, like one who plays on the streets with a coffee cup to dump money in right? Not like one that has actual records. Don't flatter yourself to much, you probably aren't worth the gum under the bus seat.
With all due respect, you are a musician. You don't know anything about biology, ecology, geology, biochemistry or paleontology, and if you do, i'm sure it is not nearly as much as a student like me, let alone a professor. I doubt you can read a proper review from a scientific journal and comment on it (something which i too could not before university). So don't think you know and understand all about climate change, because you don't, not by a long shot, musician.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Let's just say this. I had a degree in comp sci and economics. Which I understand completely. As a both left and right brain thinker I consider myself to have the advantage over most. I do look at evidence and I have seen all of the pro Global Warming arguments. But there are holes in the theory of Global Warming. That coupled with the arguments coming form th IPCC (which is UN and not to be trusted) I can see BS all over it. The things that are out there are truth. (part 1)
What does your nationality mean? Nothing. Everyone was an immigrant once and it is retarded to brag about the country from which you are. You have no control over that, how can you be proud of a coincidence. People should be proud of what they achieved, not of which country they happened to be born in. Think about it. Nationality is completely irrational and irrelevant, if you think about it. And i was a nationalist once.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I can't explain this to you. You're using what you think is common sense logic. You trust that these scientist motives are pure. They are not. It's human nature to take the money, The evil isn't really them. The evil is the UN. You cannot simply believe what you're told. They treat you like a sheep. And you give them a sheep.
The same can be said of your conspiracy theorists. The difference is that i understand scientific logic and can reason about science, that is why i understand the scientific theories and you can't understand yours, you just follow them. So however you are going to twist or turn this, it all come down to opinion, and then whoever knows most on the subject, and that would be me. You don't have a clue how electron orbitals affect infrared refraction, i do.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Wow. You know more. WRONG. I can read data just as much as the next person. You are not scientifically superior to me. In the least. You follow IPCC reports. There is untainted data out there that isn't IPCC that credible scientists are tryin to get out that comes with death threats. The science is not fact. There is no twisting and turning. You are only listing to the UN IPCC and thats it. YOU are the one who isn't following science. PEACE!
You can read data,indeed i believe you can. You can read the clock, but do you now how it ticks? You don't. With all due respect if you read an article which claims greenhouse gases are myths, you'll believe it, whatever so called evidence they provide, because you don't understand the theories behind greenhouse gases. I will see how their 'evidence' is crap and dismiss it. Face it, you're a musician, not a scientist. You don't have a clue how this stuff works.
Please, i want to hear your theory, honestly. What is your theory surrounding greenhouse gases. Tell me and i will tell you whether i accept it, or whether it defies all laws of physics and is pure crap. Give it a shot, i dare you. But you are a musician, so i guess you're a little low on chemical models of infrared refraction, right? Then provide me on of your conspiracy sites. Not a conspiracy theory, but a scientific explanation to why these things i learned are wrong.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect. Interestingly, many "facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.
And you do realize that the average temperature only has to go up by some 3 degrees for massive extinction of species don't you? Some 1,5 for coastal cities to disappear.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic). Part 2
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate. Part 3
Even if that hypothesis was correct, which it is not, then you should think twice. Greenhouse gases exist in nature, they do, but we add them, not only by burning fuels but also by natural ways like life-stock. Never have there been more bovines then at this given moment in earth's history and all due to bio-industry. Now, maybe our biosphere could compensate for that, was it not that we have deforested more in the last 50 years then ever before.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28. You are talking not a blip. Not something if the earth were alive would even feel enough to scratch. It';s Insignifigant. Unimportant. Not even enough to have laws against CO2 that we currently have. We've already have sensors on cars, companies spending millions to cut their emissions. The only reason to have factories with regulation stardards is so we can breathe clean air. Global Warming? WTF
They are cutting down huge green zones everyday. You may recall that green plants contain chloroplasts, which regenerate O2. No problem, you can say, a lot of CO2 disappears into the ocean. True as well, but only because of the low CO2 and relatively neutral pH of the ocean. Both of these factors are being destroyed by the flow of nitrate to the oceans, by fertilizers. Nitrate not only causes the ocean to acidify directly, it also promotes chemothophs over autotrophs
And autotrophs are the ones that maintain low CO2 in the oceans and high O2, because the are the oceans 'green'. Chemotrophs on the other hand process ammonia and ammonium into nitrate, which acidifies the oceans again.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH " There is no dispute at all about the fact that even if punctiliously observed, (the Kyoto Protocol) would have an imperceptible effect on future temperatures -- one-twentieth of a degree by 2050. "
First of all, water vapor does not exist because of temperature in nature, but mostly because of the difference in pressure between water and air. Water vapor is exchangeable at rapid rates because of this same pressure gradient. Water vapor is also in no way comparable with CO2, because it behaves differently. It forms clouds and semi-dense structures, which behave like reflectors, canceling out incoming rays as well as outgoing ones.CO2 only contains heat, it doesn't shield
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH 0.28% my friend. INSIGNIFIGANT!!! Any attempts to curb temperatures due to Kyoto or Cap and Trade will have minut or no effect on temperatures. So now that we know how ridiculously overstated the GW crowd makes there case. And it really is grossly overstated the question would come down to why. And that there is my point. Power and Money. PERIOD. If anyone reads this who has not formed an opinion on GW, will see I am correct. It's obvious my arguments are correct
Why do you care so much about oil anyway? Would it be so heart-breaking for you to know your tv runs on power, coming from a wind-turbine? Would you die from that?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Oil? Who said anything about oil? Right now the private sector is working on alternative energy sources. But at this time it's to expensive and logistics haven't been worked through. But they will. And we will have wind turbine and a more efficient alternative to fossil fuels. That time has yet to arrive but will. Now? Oil is it. It's not going to cause the earth to explode in the solar system lol.
I meant fossil fuels, but i only get so much characters. Oh no, the universe won't be destroyed, not even the Earth, but just entire ecosystems. But you're fine with that i guess.
Do you watch the news? Oil spill? Ring any bells? Oh right i forgot, the news is being controlled by evil scientists
I'm done with you, i looked up your comments and it would appear you have nothing better to do then to type in 'Global Warming' in the search-box and comment your conspiracy theories of which you have no scientific idea on every vid that came up. You are a troll of the worst kind and a moron with no idea of any branch of science.
Go enjoy your Dunning-Kruger syndrome. Climatologists spend at least 10 years in college to got there doctorate, and work many years to become respected scientists. What does your curriculum vitae say concerning climatology? Nothing. So stop thinking you know more then respected scientists in the field. You don't know the smallest flying fuck about climatology.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH First, you need to grow up and talk like an adult or find a childs forum to play in. Second, you are telling me things I already know. Don't tell me what I care about. You obviously need to read everything I wrote.
No because i have the degree here, that doesn't mean i'm better but that means that i don't have to get my information from sites like globalwarminghoaxdotcom and i know a hell of a lot more about how biospheres work than you do.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You are still not responding to what I am saying. I say I know how things work and you say "no, because I have a degree here". Obviously, your degree isn't in communication. I also have a masters degree and enough education to have a PhD. I'm not saying I know more about it than you do, but I do think I'm able to respond to a comment better than you.
No, you don't. Read the whole discussion. Guitarman is under the impressions that there is a big conspiracy amongst scientists to create false models concerning global warning.Since he's not fit for re-education and still thinks he knows more about climatology than the scientists,although he has no background in it whatsoever, i decided the argument was useless and finished with a little sarcasm, saying that we (scientists who do realize it's man-influenced), control the media as well
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I knew it was sarcasm and agreed with you. I do realize it's not man made. I do realize we are in a global cool down right now. You are arguing with the wrong person. I had agreed with you!
No you don't get the concept of sarcasm. I said we, awg-defenders, are evil scientists who control the media. Hence we are not. There is no global coll-down going on right now, i don't know where you get that kind of information. You're just another raggedy-ass moron who wants to drive 4 tuns of pickup because you feel big on the road. You don't know shit of climatology, i suggest you stick to whatever you have a degree in, because it doesn't have anything to do with biosperes
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH It's a scam a fraud period. It as UN agenda 21 drivin farce to transfer wealth that's it. The scientific community anymore is a complete joke in all fields of study. It boils down to money and politics. If you think science is accurate or nobel in anyway anymore? You are out of your mind
@SuperGuitarman69 He said he has no idea where I come up with a global cooling. If he was who he said he is, even if he doesn't believe the earth is cooling, he would know there are scientists saying that we are in the 12th year of a global cooling. There's no way he wouldn't know it.
@gigman7 He is an agendist. Plain and simple. It is fun to debate them because the science proves them wrong time and time again. IPCC is a fraud plain and simple
And you suffer from Dunning-Kruger as well. Look it up. You're a musician, nothing wrong with that, the world would look a lot less fine without music, but you need to except the fact that that means there are thousands of scholars who know much, much more than you about the climate and how it works.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH My degrees are in Computer Science and Economics. So I have a science background. And I know music theory backwards and forwards. And I read and study. Once I figure something out, I either embrace or dismiss it. I believed in it at one point. I did research from all angles. Scientifically and politically. I had conversations with employees of Al Gore's (I live in Nashville) I used all the info to deduce my position logically. As that is what I do. So no, I do not believe in AGW
So at best scientists make you process data, and nor informatics nor economy has anything to do with climate change. If you think it does, then you are the agendist, because you know what banning oil drilling would do to your economy.
And concerning informatics, at best scientists let you type in the numbers, you still don't know a damn thing about how it all works.
If our informatics assistants knew the science behind the numbers we have them calculate, i wouldn't have a damn job, because they could do the entire project from theoretical model to execution, processing and conclusion.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I get sarcasm!! I get your sarcasm. I also get you have a hard time with English and you have a difficult time with your typing skills. In other words, it's you who is the moron. I have a science degree and have spent many years teaching science. Now, you stick to your education because you will need to go to high school when you get past the 7th and 8th grade. If you knew anything about climatology, you would know where I get the 'cool-down'.
My mother tongue is Dutch, give it try. Let's see your typing skills in Dutch. Stop the spelling-thing, be glad people take the effort to communicate in English on youtube because most Americans are to incapable to learn more then 2 languages.
What science might your degree be in? I'm not in high school, numbnuts, i' in the final master-year Biomedical Sciences and i specialize in environmental influences en surroundings, which goes from the toxicity of smoking to the effect of ....
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I don't speak Dutch. We are on an "English" forum. Your comments are irrelevant. I have no reason to learn it so why would I waste my time??
If you aren't in high school then stop acting like it.
Oh you don't care. Boo hoo, to fucking bad Captain Capslock. 3 languages? That's pretty pathetic, knowing you only know 2 if you don't count sign language. Maybe you should go back to high school, they thought us, in Belgium, at least 4 (English, German, Dutch, French) plus Latin and Italian in my case.
... climate changes on biospheres, which means i am a few courses short of a bachelor in climatology as well. You have what?
I suggest you read a scientific magazine, none of that globalwarminghoaxdotcom crap, but a real scientific magazine like Eos, Nature, The Cell, Science American or just National Geographic. You can find a lot of these articles on PNAS. They are the result of years of scientific research by people who know infinitely more than you when it comes to climatology.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Has absolutely nothing to do with anything I said nor anything that has anything to do with what we are talking about. Want to prove again that you are not worthy of being taken seriously on the things you say?
Neither did my spelling, but your commons sense didn't figure that out. Off course i'm not taken you and your backyard science seriously. If scientists did that, national geographic would be full with articles by rednecks, saying : "There can't be no global warming, 'cause my crops froze last winter. Y'all don't have thermometers.". The fact that the last winter was cold doesn't prove there is no global warming. Have you ever had any classes in statistics or scientific methods?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Nor am I taking you and you lack of education seriously. Stop going to places like this and trying to prove people wrong just because you have had a couple of classes in college. It's not time for you yet. You are still learning from people who have degrees like myself.
"Have you ever had any classes in statistics or scientific methods?"
Not only have I had these classes, I have taught it.
Are you kidding me, your the 'global warming is a hoax'-guy. The only reason you watched this vid is because you type in 'global warming' or 'al gore' in the search box and comment your denial on every vid you encounter. You're the one who is just visiting these vids to comment on them. I came to watch this funny song, and saw a bunch of idiots like you, to whom i replied.
How can you teach at a university if you don't have a doctorate? You said you have a masters degree?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You really need to stop thinking you know something about someone you don't even know. No, that's not how I found this video.
I never said where I taught, and yes, you can teach at a university with a masters. Are you really in college or are you starting high school this year? You really don't seem to know much about it.
Oh, and stop calling someone an idiot when you have proven many times that you don't know what you are talking about.
The only way someone with a masters degree is teaching at my university, or in my neighboring countries is with a doctorate, or as an assistant, writing his or her doctoral work. Maybe that says something about quality of education. You teaching scientific methods? What's next, a creationist teaching evolution of life and species? Someone who thinks the earth is flat teaching cartography?
What did you prove exactly? I have yet to see a peer-reviewed scientific article...
Yes it does. Like the creationist you have tuns of evidence against you but for some reason you still clamp on to your views. You're in ways worse than the creationist. Like guitarman, the creationist doesn't know anything about science and his main argument is 'there is no evidence', while there is a lot. But you claim to know scientific methods, you have background and you still don't want to except conclusions that have been drawn after years of debated scientific research.
That means that, unlike guitarman, you are not ignorant, you are an actual idiot. So you're right, you're not like the creationist trying to teach evolution, you're actually worse. Why you still support your beliefs, while you must know that science has proved you wrong, if you indeed have a master in Life Science, is another question. My guess would be political motives, but it could be a variety of things. I take my words back, you don't suffer from Dunning-Kruger, you're just off.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH That's funny. In idiot calling me an idiot. Meaning that I am doing something right because he can't understand.
If you were who you said you were, education and all, you would know that science has NOT proven me wrong. More scientists believe in what I am saying than what you are saying.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Did you know that when the UN put together the group of 1,300 scientists they have working on global warming research, they interviewed over 70,000? Did you also know that in order for them to be approved for the team, that they not only had to already believe in global warming, they also had believe it was man made? Now they can say "we have 1,300 scientist who have "proven" global warming. Well, what they don't say is they let go over 70,000 who disagree with them!
The UN doesn't control the scientific press. Maybe you're one of those crazy NWO-conspiracy theorists again... And your statistics are pretty flawed if you conclude from that that 70 000 in 71 300 scientists think global warming is not man-made.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Oh and how does it feel to be schooled OVER and OVER again by gigma7n????? It appears to me that everything you quote or throw out there gets shot down in a fire ball of Bullshit by the guy. And, I'm being objective about it!!!
By the way, if you knew anything at all about ecology, you would know burning fossil fuels doesn't just affect climate change, but entire species. Because you are converting un-consumable nutrients to consumable non-nutrients. And you should look up how that disturbs the low of energy and the circle of matter in an ecosystem.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Do you know who is leading the way with NO MEDIA COVERAGE? GE. What network does GE own? MSNBC. Who would benefit most from the GW hysteria? GE. What network is in the tank for the left? MSNBC. Without the GW scare they might not get the tax dollars for research from the federal government. Instead of using capitalism. GE's own money. They want us to pick up the tab for their research. But guess in actuallity is leading the way? EXXON!
I'm not going to continue this troll-war with you, because you will defeat me. Not with science, but with experience in trolling. Don't bother replying, you're going to the spam-bin anyway.
Again, you miss the bigger picture. 0,28 is a lot to accomplish over a natural threshold, my friend. Science is not about big numbers, you can't just call what you think is a small amount insignificant. That would require statistic trials, which you also have no clue of i'm guessing. E;G. 2 ppm Cadmium can distort the growth of legumes by 200 %. Do you know how little 2 ppm is? Climate change is only a small part of the issue here, by the way, it's about messing up in total
I'm not making that up about the cadmium and no, it's not a government-issued book. It's an experiment we did single-handedly at the university, so don't even try to go there.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH there are 1000's of scientists out there who disagree on the IPCC assesment many who were a part of it that think either 1) there is no such thing as man made GW 2) there is a small part of it that man contributes to it but not to any major degree and it's absurd to think it 3) This is an agenda set forth by the un to start controlling countries. I have read AGENDA 21 and fully agree. So, the economic reprocussions are huge. Losing soveirgnty is a concern for sure.
No, that is not evidence, that is a conspiracy theory. Again, i study, i know how greenhouse gasses work, i know the principles of energy flow, i understand the logic behind it.
Those scientists are about as accepted as those who question evolution or those who claim Pythagoras had his triangular formulas wrong.
Losing sovereignty (whatever that has to do with this) is of no concern. I was once a nationalist but i realized 'who gives a damn'. There are more important things.
Scientists have known for some time that the great ice sheet was losing mass over southeastern portions of Greenland, but a new analysis describes "an on-going northward migration of increasing mass loss" along the western coast from the southern tip to the far north.
Global economic growth - in its current form - cannot continue if nations are serious about curbing climate change, says Andrew Simms. In this week's Green Room, he warns that the consumer society cannot "have its planet and eat it".
This has been one of the coolest summers on record. They've noticed it so now they aren't using "Global Warming" as much as they use "Climate Change". It is one of the biggest scams ever and Al Gore is the ring leader. Now the Nobel Peace Prize is just another "Idiot" award. Two of Americas Top Idiots have won.
Algore is in hiding. He'll come out in the middle of summer. I think he learned his lesson when he scheduled a climate conference and had to cancel because of freezing weather, ice, etc.
Didn't he just lie again, by saying the earths core is a few million degrees? HA HA HA!! Idiot. Ask him how BIG his carbon footprint is? Oh yeah, you'll get your mic shut off when you got a "gotcha" question for him. Hypocrites. Do as I say, but NOT as I do.
I do'n know bout this Global Warming thing, ya it's hot now. But it's also summer. But during winter we had one of the worst ice storms in the past 50 years here in the mid-west I wonder how that fits in to the global warming theory.
it's called disregard facts and believe what the environmental left tells you.. do not question the facts that disprove the myth! You will do exactly what they say..
If they could, they would control how many times you can flush your toilet, open your refridgerator, and use your television.
Enough is never enough for the global marxist because they invent a phony problem, and then sieze your liberty to say they will resolve it.
Mhmmm, just last night I was listening to FOX News Radio, and Alan Combs had a guy call in about Global Warming, and ask. "How do you explain that, planets like Mars have ALSO warmed up the same amount as Earth according to NASA" but Alan just could only really say "Well Mars has other factors but the it's defiantly human influence on Earth" Before cutting him off, then cut the guy off who was gonna say something along the same lines. Because he had no real way to explain it.
Global warming is a myth. The only global temperature change is cooling, which our earth has been doing for the last twenty years. The earht goes through cycles of heat and cold, its nothing new.
doctor up movie polar bears are breading like rabbits big scam to make al gore acorn and all there buddies rich and talking more of are rights away in the process
If it warms enough, newly melted cold water will flow into the gulf stream and we will experience colder globe temps. So yes, we will be cooling... and flooding
wow... Just wow. How can any of you think this is a hoax? The medieval warming period was only aabout a tenth of what we have now. ughh. It is basic science that what we are doing is causing a problem. Even if it is a minor temp change it will cause a chain reaction that could lead to serious problems. Y would ppl lie about it? To destroy an oil economy that could make them rich? To be president and LOSE money in the process? Nobody just wants to hear it. O and cooling is a natrual part of it.
Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse gas concentrations.
(continue) Anthropogenic warming and sea level rise would continue for centuries due to the timescales associated with climate processes and feedbacks, even if greenhouse gas concentrations were to be stabilized, although the likely amount of temperature
and sea level rise varies greatly depending on the fossil intensity of human activity during the next century
I agree pollution is bad, which is why whites shouldn't share our technology with the billions of third worlders. But Global Warming is bullshit designed to tax white countries to pay for free tech development for anti-white countries.
I bet you could also do with masses of rain, and many people DIEING and needing relocation because rising oceans due to melting ice caps will have destroyed cities. I bet you could also do with unpredictable weather, and massive storms and hurricanes, because these are all effects. Only a complete ignorant retard would think that the only effect of all this shit we are spewing out into the atmosphere will only result in nice sunny days.
The same reason he flew on a 747 to NY on the coldest day on record in decades, to bitch about "global warming." hahahhaaha Do we live in an alternate universe or something? kevyster (3 weeks ago)
+3
Reply | Spam
why didn't Al turn his lights off during Earth hour?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You're are COMPLETELY wrong. I suppose all this scientific evidence is pointless then? Emmissions can amplify the suns rays etc and WHY THE FUCK are you even trying to convince people that it's not real? Just because you can't be fucking arsed to turn off some lights it doesn't mean we should waste all the resources and create a hell for our decendents.
Do your research. The ice caps are at the same levels they were when measured back in the 70's. We are now in a cooling period.Global warming, and cooling, are caused by solar cycles. Yes, the sun has heating and cooling periods. We just entered one of it's colder cycles. The last century of human environmental emissions have contributed perhaps .4 centigrade or something like that. If you want to stop global warming, or cooling, I suggest you go bitch at the sun.
I bet you could also do with masses of rain, and many people DIEING and needing relocation because rising oceans due to melting ice caps will have destroyed cities. I bet you could also do with unpredictable weather, and massive storms and hurricanes, because these are all effects. Only a complete ignorant retard would think that the only effect of all this shit we are spewing out into the atmosphere will only result in nice sunny days.
Al is praying a Blizzard doesn't hit Las Vegas during his next Global Warming Conference, which if he really wanted to help, he would would just shut up.
Boring
LifeRockzification 1 month ago
AAAh.
zivkovicable 1 month ago
Evidence / impacts of climate change series…
.
When to move species struggling with climate change
.
As climate changes make native habitats unlivable to plants and animals, these species have two choices: Leave or go extinct.
Now, researchers are offering guidance on when conservationists should undertake the last-ditch strategy of transplanting struggling species to new habitats.
.
LiveScience
25 July 2011
Nightversionn 6 months ago
FUCK Al Gore!
cub19 1 year ago
@cub19 all for that one buddy! what a ding ding! i got 40 inches of snow this year!
tslabjr7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
True Free energy devices exist,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
ivylsp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you want to see something interesting about Global Warming and James Cameron, watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=TKZ4RolQxec
noteviljustwrong 1 year ago
Glad to see Tipper finally wised up, and dumped his ass!
skudaarkaat1 1 year ago
Superguitarman69 is so stupid!
HottieBrittany 1 year ago
@HottieBrittany For making a logical statement?
gigman7 1 year ago
People believed this clown?
tonylee1973 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
The story of AL GORE&CARLYLE Group-(S.Frisco)Its called EX PRESIDENTS club(GREENHOUSE-GLOBAL WARMING-CLIMATE CHANGE- GREEN ENERGY-SMART ENERGY)-It's LIE-LIE! Thats why NAME keeps changing like LIES chg! You can call it CAP&TAX-is what it does-Another Globalist Scheme so bunch of corrupt EX-Presidents-like BUSH,RAMOS (Philippians,) MAJOR(Brit,)Al GORE can steal more $BILLIONS from TAXES-(ROMANS taxed WORLD)the GOV. PUPPETS must have$B's to join Ruling Elites vs.FEMA death camps with us PLEBS!.
exposetruthwolf 1 year ago
See folks. SSTTEEAALLTTHH is the typical leftist. He debates a musician whom everyone seems to think should be dumb? Not true in the least. I debate him honestly with facts. After he debates for awhile then i've givin him logical conclusions he calls me a moron and a troll. This is the lefts MO. Especially those on the Global Warming side. It's unfortunante that they WILL NOT LISTEN TO FACTS AND LOGIC!
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
May i suggest all the dickheads who want to protect their oil go do something productive instead of just looking up 'global warming' or 'al gore' and commenting 'it's a scam' without further evidence on every vid they find.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I do present evidence. You need to look at all my posts. Read AGENDA 21. That will educate you on what is behind it. Politicians, Scientists, and Corporations are benefactors from the agenda. The debate is over. It's not only a scam it's about NWO no question about it
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
No, you make a classic mistake, you provide conspiracy theories. Show me a proper peer-reviewed article from Nature or the Cell or another scientific magazine. That would be evidence
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Post the entire AGENDA 21? READ IT YOURSELF
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
I didn't say you should post it! What are you, stupid? I said it was bullshit and that it is not evidence. It is a conspiracy theory! Give me a proper peer-reviewed article from a scientific journal which provides data that indicates there is no man-induced climate change. I wouldn't bother searching though, because you are not going to find any. You're basically doing the same thing as questioning evolution.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Garth Paltridge, Visiting Fellow ANU and retired Chief Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired Director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre."There are good and straightforward scientific reasons to believe that the burning of fossil fuel and consequent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide will lead to an increase in the average temperature of the world above that which would otherwise be the case.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I can go on and on and on and on. It's pointless. I have to get the crap out of your head first. You have to first see that there is no GW to see the what is behind it. Sorry, but this is a dead issue. Many like myself who started out concerned about GW, then finding that it was a scam, then studying further to find out what really was going on is about a 2 year process. Any IPCC study that is out is fraudulant and propaganda.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
You are going to get crap out of my head? I'm sorry, but what scientific education did you enjoy at which university again? Sorry, but i'll take my chances with my education, my observations and my professors (who have studied for over 10 years post-academically).
Haha, there is no way to have a conversation with a conspiracy theorist. Every evidence I will provide you, you will simply reject as a scam, even though there have been studies, observations and reviews.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Your professors? Let me let you in on a little secret about your professors. They do not have jobs. Anyone, ANYONE who gets paid with a government check is employed by me and the nation. Of course those morons support government take over of everything. All they've ever known was public education. I laugh in the face of professors. I am a musician for a living and the professors that taught? CANT PLAY! I teach their students that have degrees
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
Here's what i heard: Blablabla, jealous of people with education, blabla conspiracy theory, blabla NWO, blabla crazy, blabla, need to get laid.
Care to throw in some Roswell, Rothshild, Illuminati and other crazy shit?
Hahah a musician? No kidding, like one who plays on the streets with a coffee cup to dump money in right? Not like one that has actual records. Don't flatter yourself to much, you probably aren't worth the gum under the bus seat.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
With all due respect, you are a musician. You don't know anything about biology, ecology, geology, biochemistry or paleontology, and if you do, i'm sure it is not nearly as much as a student like me, let alone a professor. I doubt you can read a proper review from a scientific journal and comment on it (something which i too could not before university). So don't think you know and understand all about climate change, because you don't, not by a long shot, musician.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Let's just say this. I had a degree in comp sci and economics. Which I understand completely. As a both left and right brain thinker I consider myself to have the advantage over most. I do look at evidence and I have seen all of the pro Global Warming arguments. But there are holes in the theory of Global Warming. That coupled with the arguments coming form th IPCC (which is UN and not to be trusted) I can see BS all over it. The things that are out there are truth. (part 1)
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
What does your nationality mean? Nothing. Everyone was an immigrant once and it is retarded to brag about the country from which you are. You have no control over that, how can you be proud of a coincidence. People should be proud of what they achieved, not of which country they happened to be born in. Think about it. Nationality is completely irrational and irrelevant, if you think about it. And i was a nationalist once.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I can't explain this to you. You're using what you think is common sense logic. You trust that these scientist motives are pure. They are not. It's human nature to take the money, The evil isn't really them. The evil is the UN. You cannot simply believe what you're told. They treat you like a sheep. And you give them a sheep.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
The same can be said of your conspiracy theorists. The difference is that i understand scientific logic and can reason about science, that is why i understand the scientific theories and you can't understand yours, you just follow them. So however you are going to twist or turn this, it all come down to opinion, and then whoever knows most on the subject, and that would be me. You don't have a clue how electron orbitals affect infrared refraction, i do.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Wow. You know more. WRONG. I can read data just as much as the next person. You are not scientifically superior to me. In the least. You follow IPCC reports. There is untainted data out there that isn't IPCC that credible scientists are tryin to get out that comes with death threats. The science is not fact. There is no twisting and turning. You are only listing to the UN IPCC and thats it. YOU are the one who isn't following science. PEACE!
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
You can read data,indeed i believe you can. You can read the clock, but do you now how it ticks? You don't. With all due respect if you read an article which claims greenhouse gases are myths, you'll believe it, whatever so called evidence they provide, because you don't understand the theories behind greenhouse gases. I will see how their 'evidence' is crap and dismiss it. Face it, you're a musician, not a scientist. You don't have a clue how this stuff works.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
Please, i want to hear your theory, honestly. What is your theory surrounding greenhouse gases. Tell me and i will tell you whether i accept it, or whether it defies all laws of physics and is pure crap. Give it a shot, i dare you. But you are a musician, so i guess you're a little low on chemical models of infrared refraction, right? Then provide me on of your conspiracy sites. Not a conspiracy theory, but a scientific explanation to why these things i learned are wrong.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect. Interestingly, many "facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.
Part 1
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
And you do realize that the average temperature only has to go up by some 3 degrees for massive extinction of species don't you? Some 1,5 for coastal cities to disappear.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic). Part 2
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate. Part 3
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
Even if that hypothesis was correct, which it is not, then you should think twice. Greenhouse gases exist in nature, they do, but we add them, not only by burning fuels but also by natural ways like life-stock. Never have there been more bovines then at this given moment in earth's history and all due to bio-industry. Now, maybe our biosphere could compensate for that, was it not that we have deforested more in the last 50 years then ever before.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28. You are talking not a blip. Not something if the earth were alive would even feel enough to scratch. It';s Insignifigant. Unimportant. Not even enough to have laws against CO2 that we currently have. We've already have sensors on cars, companies spending millions to cut their emissions. The only reason to have factories with regulation stardards is so we can breathe clean air. Global Warming? WTF
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
They are cutting down huge green zones everyday. You may recall that green plants contain chloroplasts, which regenerate O2. No problem, you can say, a lot of CO2 disappears into the ocean. True as well, but only because of the low CO2 and relatively neutral pH of the ocean. Both of these factors are being destroyed by the flow of nitrate to the oceans, by fertilizers. Nitrate not only causes the ocean to acidify directly, it also promotes chemothophs over autotrophs
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
And autotrophs are the ones that maintain low CO2 in the oceans and high O2, because the are the oceans 'green'. Chemotrophs on the other hand process ammonia and ammonium into nitrate, which acidifies the oceans again.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH " There is no dispute at all about the fact that even if punctiliously observed, (the Kyoto Protocol) would have an imperceptible effect on future temperatures -- one-twentieth of a degree by 2050. "
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
First of all, water vapor does not exist because of temperature in nature, but mostly because of the difference in pressure between water and air. Water vapor is exchangeable at rapid rates because of this same pressure gradient. Water vapor is also in no way comparable with CO2, because it behaves differently. It forms clouds and semi-dense structures, which behave like reflectors, canceling out incoming rays as well as outgoing ones.CO2 only contains heat, it doesn't shield
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH 0.28% my friend. INSIGNIFIGANT!!! Any attempts to curb temperatures due to Kyoto or Cap and Trade will have minut or no effect on temperatures. So now that we know how ridiculously overstated the GW crowd makes there case. And it really is grossly overstated the question would come down to why. And that there is my point. Power and Money. PERIOD. If anyone reads this who has not formed an opinion on GW, will see I am correct. It's obvious my arguments are correct
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
Why do you care so much about oil anyway? Would it be so heart-breaking for you to know your tv runs on power, coming from a wind-turbine? Would you die from that?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Oil? Who said anything about oil? Right now the private sector is working on alternative energy sources. But at this time it's to expensive and logistics haven't been worked through. But they will. And we will have wind turbine and a more efficient alternative to fossil fuels. That time has yet to arrive but will. Now? Oil is it. It's not going to cause the earth to explode in the solar system lol.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
I meant fossil fuels, but i only get so much characters. Oh no, the universe won't be destroyed, not even the Earth, but just entire ecosystems. But you're fine with that i guess.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Name one ecosystem that has been destroyed by fossil fuels?
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
Do you watch the news? Oil spill? Ring any bells? Oh right i forgot, the news is being controlled by evil scientists
I'm done with you, i looked up your comments and it would appear you have nothing better to do then to type in 'Global Warming' in the search-box and comment your conspiracy theories of which you have no scientific idea on every vid that came up. You are a troll of the worst kind and a moron with no idea of any branch of science.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You mean the "evil scientists" who say there is no global warming?
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
Go enjoy your Dunning-Kruger syndrome. Climatologists spend at least 10 years in college to got there doctorate, and work many years to become respected scientists. What does your curriculum vitae say concerning climatology? Nothing. So stop thinking you know more then respected scientists in the field. You don't know the smallest flying fuck about climatology.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH First, you need to grow up and talk like an adult or find a childs forum to play in. Second, you are telling me things I already know. Don't tell me what I care about. You obviously need to read everything I wrote.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
No because i have the degree here, that doesn't mean i'm better but that means that i don't have to get my information from sites like globalwarminghoaxdotcom and i know a hell of a lot more about how biospheres work than you do.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You are still not responding to what I am saying. I say I know how things work and you say "no, because I have a degree here". Obviously, your degree isn't in communication. I also have a masters degree and enough education to have a PhD. I'm not saying I know more about it than you do, but I do think I'm able to respond to a comment better than you.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
No, you don't. Read the whole discussion. Guitarman is under the impressions that there is a big conspiracy amongst scientists to create false models concerning global warning.Since he's not fit for re-education and still thinks he knows more about climatology than the scientists,although he has no background in it whatsoever, i decided the argument was useless and finished with a little sarcasm, saying that we (scientists who do realize it's man-influenced), control the media as well
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I knew it was sarcasm and agreed with you. I do realize it's not man made. I do realize we are in a global cool down right now. You are arguing with the wrong person. I had agreed with you!
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
No you don't get the concept of sarcasm. I said we, awg-defenders, are evil scientists who control the media. Hence we are not. There is no global coll-down going on right now, i don't know where you get that kind of information. You're just another raggedy-ass moron who wants to drive 4 tuns of pickup because you feel big on the road. You don't know shit of climatology, i suggest you stick to whatever you have a degree in, because it doesn't have anything to do with biosperes
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH It's a scam a fraud period. It as UN agenda 21 drivin farce to transfer wealth that's it. The scientific community anymore is a complete joke in all fields of study. It boils down to money and politics. If you think science is accurate or nobel in anyway anymore? You are out of your mind
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69 He has been lying about his background and education. He just proved it to me.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7 How?
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69 He said he has no idea where I come up with a global cooling. If he was who he said he is, even if he doesn't believe the earth is cooling, he would know there are scientists saying that we are in the 12th year of a global cooling. There's no way he wouldn't know it.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7 He is an agendist. Plain and simple. It is fun to debate them because the science proves them wrong time and time again. IPCC is a fraud plain and simple
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
And you suffer from Dunning-Kruger as well. Look it up. You're a musician, nothing wrong with that, the world would look a lot less fine without music, but you need to except the fact that that means there are thousands of scholars who know much, much more than you about the climate and how it works.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH My degrees are in Computer Science and Economics. So I have a science background. And I know music theory backwards and forwards. And I read and study. Once I figure something out, I either embrace or dismiss it. I believed in it at one point. I did research from all angles. Scientifically and politically. I had conversations with employees of Al Gore's (I live in Nashville) I used all the info to deduce my position logically. As that is what I do. So no, I do not believe in AGW
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
So at best scientists make you process data, and nor informatics nor economy has anything to do with climate change. If you think it does, then you are the agendist, because you know what banning oil drilling would do to your economy.
And concerning informatics, at best scientists let you type in the numbers, you still don't know a damn thing about how it all works.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
If our informatics assistants knew the science behind the numbers we have them calculate, i wouldn't have a damn job, because they could do the entire project from theoretical model to execution, processing and conclusion.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I get sarcasm!! I get your sarcasm. I also get you have a hard time with English and you have a difficult time with your typing skills. In other words, it's you who is the moron. I have a science degree and have spent many years teaching science. Now, you stick to your education because you will need to go to high school when you get past the 7th and 8th grade. If you knew anything about climatology, you would know where I get the 'cool-down'.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
My mother tongue is Dutch, give it try. Let's see your typing skills in Dutch. Stop the spelling-thing, be glad people take the effort to communicate in English on youtube because most Americans are to incapable to learn more then 2 languages.
What science might your degree be in? I'm not in high school, numbnuts, i' in the final master-year Biomedical Sciences and i specialize in environmental influences en surroundings, which goes from the toxicity of smoking to the effect of ....
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I don't speak Dutch. We are on an "English" forum. Your comments are irrelevant. I have no reason to learn it so why would I waste my time??
If you aren't in high school then stop acting like it.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
1) youtube can be accesed in a variety of languages, including dutch
2) you're comment on spelling is still irrelevant
3) i bet you couldn't learn more then 2 languages if someone locked you up with them.
4) you're the kid who's screaming about spelling
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH
1) I don't care. Means NOTHING to me!
2) No, it's not.
3) You don't even know how many languages I know. If you count sign language, I know 3.
4) I'm a 44 year old man who is not screaming about anything. Just pointing out facts.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
Oh you don't care. Boo hoo, to fucking bad Captain Capslock. 3 languages? That's pretty pathetic, knowing you only know 2 if you don't count sign language. Maybe you should go back to high school, they thought us, in Belgium, at least 4 (English, German, Dutch, French) plus Latin and Italian in my case.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@gigman7
... climate changes on biospheres, which means i am a few courses short of a bachelor in climatology as well. You have what?
I suggest you read a scientific magazine, none of that globalwarminghoaxdotcom crap, but a real scientific magazine like Eos, Nature, The Cell, Science American or just National Geographic. You can find a lot of these articles on PNAS. They are the result of years of scientific research by people who know infinitely more than you when it comes to climatology.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH My degree is in life science. I read many different things. I also have a lot of common and logical sense.
They also know much more than you do. Stay in school. You have a long way to go.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
Well, your common sense couldn't figure out that are more then 5,5 billion people in the world who's mother tongue isn't English...
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Has absolutely nothing to do with anything I said nor anything that has anything to do with what we are talking about. Want to prove again that you are not worthy of being taken seriously on the things you say?
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
Neither did my spelling, but your commons sense didn't figure that out. Off course i'm not taken you and your backyard science seriously. If scientists did that, national geographic would be full with articles by rednecks, saying : "There can't be no global warming, 'cause my crops froze last winter. Y'all don't have thermometers.". The fact that the last winter was cold doesn't prove there is no global warming. Have you ever had any classes in statistics or scientific methods?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Nor am I taking you and you lack of education seriously. Stop going to places like this and trying to prove people wrong just because you have had a couple of classes in college. It's not time for you yet. You are still learning from people who have degrees like myself.
"Have you ever had any classes in statistics or scientific methods?"
Not only have I had these classes, I have taught it.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
Are you kidding me, your the 'global warming is a hoax'-guy. The only reason you watched this vid is because you type in 'global warming' or 'al gore' in the search box and comment your denial on every vid you encounter. You're the one who is just visiting these vids to comment on them. I came to watch this funny song, and saw a bunch of idiots like you, to whom i replied.
How can you teach at a university if you don't have a doctorate? You said you have a masters degree?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You really need to stop thinking you know something about someone you don't even know. No, that's not how I found this video.
I never said where I taught, and yes, you can teach at a university with a masters. Are you really in college or are you starting high school this year? You really don't seem to know much about it.
Oh, and stop calling someone an idiot when you have proven many times that you don't know what you are talking about.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
The only way someone with a masters degree is teaching at my university, or in my neighboring countries is with a doctorate, or as an assistant, writing his or her doctoral work. Maybe that says something about quality of education. You teaching scientific methods? What's next, a creationist teaching evolution of life and species? Someone who thinks the earth is flat teaching cartography?
What did you prove exactly? I have yet to see a peer-reviewed scientific article...
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Same thing here. Says something about the quality of education here also.
Your examples of my teaching the scientific method has nothing to do with the examples you just gave.
You just proved it for me. Again.
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
Yes it does. Like the creationist you have tuns of evidence against you but for some reason you still clamp on to your views. You're in ways worse than the creationist. Like guitarman, the creationist doesn't know anything about science and his main argument is 'there is no evidence', while there is a lot. But you claim to know scientific methods, you have background and you still don't want to except conclusions that have been drawn after years of debated scientific research.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@gigman7
That means that, unlike guitarman, you are not ignorant, you are an actual idiot. So you're right, you're not like the creationist trying to teach evolution, you're actually worse. Why you still support your beliefs, while you must know that science has proved you wrong, if you indeed have a master in Life Science, is another question. My guess would be political motives, but it could be a variety of things. I take my words back, you don't suffer from Dunning-Kruger, you're just off.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH That's funny. In idiot calling me an idiot. Meaning that I am doing something right because he can't understand.
If you were who you said you were, education and all, you would know that science has NOT proven me wrong. More scientists believe in what I am saying than what you are saying.
gigman7 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Did you know that when the UN put together the group of 1,300 scientists they have working on global warming research, they interviewed over 70,000? Did you also know that in order for them to be approved for the team, that they not only had to already believe in global warming, they also had believe it was man made? Now they can say "we have 1,300 scientist who have "proven" global warming. Well, what they don't say is they let go over 70,000 who disagree with them!
gigman7 1 year ago
@gigman7
The UN doesn't control the scientific press. Maybe you're one of those crazy NWO-conspiracy theorists again... And your statistics are pretty flawed if you conclude from that that 70 000 in 71 300 scientists think global warming is not man-made.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH
"The UN doesn't control the scientific press"
I never said they did.
"Maybe you're one of those crazy NWO-conspiracy theorists again"
Maybe you need to quit making false assumptions.
"And your statistics are pretty flawed if you conclude from that that 70 000 in 71 300 scientists think global warming is not man-made."
Right. You are either bad at math or can't read.
gigman7 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH
"The UN doesn't control the scientific press"
I never said it did.
"Maybe you're one of those crazy NWO-conspiracy theorists"
Maybe you need to quit making false assumptions.
"And your statistics are pretty flawed if you conclude from that that 70 000 in 71 300 scientists think global warming is not man-made"
I didn't say it was. You either need to learn to read or you are bad at math.
gigman7 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Oh and how does it feel to be schooled OVER and OVER again by gigma7n????? It appears to me that everything you quote or throw out there gets shot down in a fire ball of Bullshit by the guy. And, I'm being objective about it!!!
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Who do you work for???
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69 none
gigman7 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
By the way, if you knew anything at all about ecology, you would know burning fossil fuels doesn't just affect climate change, but entire species. Because you are converting un-consumable nutrients to consumable non-nutrients. And you should look up how that disturbs the low of energy and the circle of matter in an ecosystem.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Do you know who is leading the way with NO MEDIA COVERAGE? GE. What network does GE own? MSNBC. Who would benefit most from the GW hysteria? GE. What network is in the tank for the left? MSNBC. Without the GW scare they might not get the tax dollars for research from the federal government. Instead of using capitalism. GE's own money. They want us to pick up the tab for their research. But guess in actuallity is leading the way? EXXON!
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
I'm not going to continue this troll-war with you, because you will defeat me. Not with science, but with experience in trolling. Don't bother replying, you're going to the spam-bin anyway.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
Again, you miss the bigger picture. 0,28 is a lot to accomplish over a natural threshold, my friend. Science is not about big numbers, you can't just call what you think is a small amount insignificant. That would require statistic trials, which you also have no clue of i'm guessing. E;G. 2 ppm Cadmium can distort the growth of legumes by 200 %. Do you know how little 2 ppm is? Climate change is only a small part of the issue here, by the way, it's about messing up in total
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
I'm not making that up about the cadmium and no, it's not a government-issued book. It's an experiment we did single-handedly at the university, so don't even try to go there.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Water vapor/ SSTTEEAALLTTHH is 95.000% of greenhouse gases natural WV 94.999 Manmade 0.001%. CO2/ 3.618% natural 3.502% Manmade 0.117%. Methane 0.3502% Manmade 0.006%. Nitrous Oxide 0.950% natural 0.903% Manmade 0.047%. Misc. gases 0.072% natural 00.25% manmade 0.047%. Natural 99.72 Manmade 0.28!!!!
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH there are 1000's of scientists out there who disagree on the IPCC assesment many who were a part of it that think either 1) there is no such thing as man made GW 2) there is a small part of it that man contributes to it but not to any major degree and it's absurd to think it 3) This is an agenda set forth by the un to start controlling countries. I have read AGENDA 21 and fully agree. So, the economic reprocussions are huge. Losing soveirgnty is a concern for sure.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
No, that is not evidence, that is a conspiracy theory. Again, i study, i know how greenhouse gasses work, i know the principles of energy flow, i understand the logic behind it.
Those scientists are about as accepted as those who question evolution or those who claim Pythagoras had his triangular formulas wrong.
Losing sovereignty (whatever that has to do with this) is of no concern. I was once a nationalist but i realized 'who gives a damn'. There are more important things.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
Oh that is funny! I'm starting to post one parody a day on my Facebook and this will be my next one. Lololol!!!
Lavenderrose73 1 year ago
Comment removed
Nightversionn 1 year ago
(continued)
Scientists have known for some time that the great ice sheet was losing mass over southeastern portions of Greenland, but a new analysis describes "an on-going northward migration of increasing mass loss" along the western coast from the southern tip to the far north.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Economic growth cannot buy the planet more time
VIEWPOINT
Andrew Simms
BBC NEWS Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Global economic growth - in its current form - cannot continue if nations are serious about curbing climate change, says Andrew Simms. In this week's Green Room, he warns that the consumer society cannot "have its planet and eat it".
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Global warming my butt. We got a foot of snow over here in VA.
hippiekyd416 2 years ago 10
@hippiekyd416 i know right, here in texas we got more snow in two months than we have had in two decades.
shiningnights14 1 year ago
@hippiekyd416 Some idiot told me yesterday that the extreme cold we had this past winter was caused by "global warming".
gigman7 1 year ago
This is freaking weird but I love it:D
AmberlaMaderia 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Global Warming is a pseudo-science like they had in the Soviet Union
The head of the Global warming Cult is a flake
The chief quack of the quacks at the IPCC is a railroad conductor
The head of the CUEI is an economist with ties to the IMF
The GW magical cure does not address the #1 factor for environmental degradation, wildlife declines, & GHG production
Yeah Global Warming is a pseudo-science
1984 Choo Choo!
THX 1138
Thisawareness 2 years ago
hey if you want snow, just let al gore come and give a speech about global warming
mnstormchaser 2 years ago
This has been one of the coolest summers on record. They've noticed it so now they aren't using "Global Warming" as much as they use "Climate Change". It is one of the biggest scams ever and Al Gore is the ring leader. Now the Nobel Peace Prize is just another "Idiot" award. Two of Americas Top Idiots have won.
jerryz71tw 2 years ago 5
Algore is in hiding. He'll come out in the middle of summer. I think he learned his lesson when he scheduled a climate conference and had to cancel because of freezing weather, ice, etc.
RobertGary1 2 years ago
An Inconvenient Douchebag!!!
postchevelle 2 years ago
Didn't he just lie again, by saying the earths core is a few million degrees? HA HA HA!! Idiot. Ask him how BIG his carbon footprint is? Oh yeah, you'll get your mic shut off when you got a "gotcha" question for him. Hypocrites. Do as I say, but NOT as I do.
rubyredlipstick71 2 years ago
why yes he did. You would think he would have his facts straight by now. I guess he tells so many lies just cant keep them straight.
2012vote 2 years ago 2
Fuck the ignorant (or sometimes, just scared shitless by lefties) environmentalists. Fuck 'em!
The ozone is not depleting. It patches itself up (that's how amazing our eco-system is) anyway. Ah, I'm too distracted by ...
fdantheman 2 years ago 2
I do'n know bout this Global Warming thing, ya it's hot now. But it's also summer. But during winter we had one of the worst ice storms in the past 50 years here in the mid-west I wonder how that fits in to the global warming theory.
LisaArinWolf 2 years ago
it's called disregard facts and believe what the environmental left tells you.. do not question the facts that disprove the myth! You will do exactly what they say..
If they could, they would control how many times you can flush your toilet, open your refridgerator, and use your television.
Enough is never enough for the global marxist because they invent a phony problem, and then sieze your liberty to say they will resolve it.
beware...
xyberfunk 2 years ago 2
Mhmmm, just last night I was listening to FOX News Radio, and Alan Combs had a guy call in about Global Warming, and ask. "How do you explain that, planets like Mars have ALSO warmed up the same amount as Earth according to NASA" but Alan just could only really say "Well Mars has other factors but the it's defiantly human influence on Earth" Before cutting him off, then cut the guy off who was gonna say something along the same lines. Because he had no real way to explain it.
LisaArinWolf 2 years ago 4
rip teddy
nice 59 caddy Al
w. probably had something stupid like a gremlin
presidentbren 2 years ago
Global warming is a myth. The only global temperature change is cooling, which our earth has been doing for the last twenty years. The earht goes through cycles of heat and cold, its nothing new.
TriCIAnoVACK 2 years ago 3
global warming the BIGGEST MYTH !
sabei 2 years ago 4
globle warming is just abig fat lie
a
al
alg
algo
algor
algore
ALGORE LISE
transfan86 2 years ago 4
doctor up movie polar bears are breading like rabbits big scam to make al gore acorn and all there buddies rich and talking more of are rights away in the process
1969goatman 2 years ago
If it warms enough, newly melted cold water will flow into the gulf stream and we will experience colder globe temps. So yes, we will be cooling... and flooding
doctorwatchamacallit 2 years ago
yes, then the warning can't happen if it's cooling. know your facts before you talk.
there is no man caused warming, it is all bullshit. it is a natural cycle.
pimpxjuice 2 years ago 2
wow... Just wow. How can any of you think this is a hoax? The medieval warming period was only aabout a tenth of what we have now. ughh. It is basic science that what we are doing is causing a problem. Even if it is a minor temp change it will cause a chain reaction that could lead to serious problems. Y would ppl lie about it? To destroy an oil economy that could make them rich? To be president and LOSE money in the process? Nobody just wants to hear it. O and cooling is a natrual part of it.
doctorwatchamacallit 2 years ago
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007.
Warming of the climate system is unequivocal.
Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse gas concentrations.
Homerp68 2 years ago
(continue) Anthropogenic warming and sea level rise would continue for centuries due to the timescales associated with climate processes and feedbacks, even if greenhouse gas concentrations were to be stabilized, although the likely amount of temperature
and sea level rise varies greatly depending on the fossil intensity of human activity during the next century
Homerp68 2 years ago
stupid
but still....
Catlover45689 2 years ago
the only thing thats warmer is ALGORE'S PROSTATE FROM TIPPER'S RUSTY STRAP ON, tipper loves to give her manbearpig ROUGH TRADE.
garyowen4ever 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1.take ur middle finger and put on ur nose.
2.say a name of someone u like.
3.that person will ask u out or say they love u tomorrow.
4. heres the thing copy and paste to 2 other vids
Kiesellachen 2 years ago
I agree pollution is bad, which is why whites shouldn't share our technology with the billions of third worlders. But Global Warming is bullshit designed to tax white countries to pay for free tech development for anti-white countries.
stopglobalswarming 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I bet you could also do with masses of rain, and many people DIEING and needing relocation because rising oceans due to melting ice caps will have destroyed cities. I bet you could also do with unpredictable weather, and massive storms and hurricanes, because these are all effects. Only a complete ignorant retard would think that the only effect of all this shit we are spewing out into the atmosphere will only result in nice sunny days.
Egroeg4 2 years ago
al gore is an idiot
jtc8516 2 years ago 4
Al Gore is an idiot
LudwigVonKoopa101 2 years ago 3
The same reason he flew on a 747 to NY on the coldest day on record in decades, to bitch about "global warming." hahahhaaha Do we live in an alternate universe or something? kevyster (3 weeks ago)
+3
Reply | Spam
why didn't Al turn his lights off during Earth hour?
stopglobalswarming 2 years ago 3
Al Gore is a jackass. Global Warming is just a crock of shit to tax white countries and "spread the wealth" to 3rd world.
STOP GLOBAL SWARMING.
stopglobalswarming 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're are COMPLETELY wrong. I suppose all this scientific evidence is pointless then? Emmissions can amplify the suns rays etc and WHY THE FUCK are you even trying to convince people that it's not real? Just because you can't be fucking arsed to turn off some lights it doesn't mean we should waste all the resources and create a hell for our decendents.
Egroeg4 2 years ago
Do your research. The ice caps are at the same levels they were when measured back in the 70's. We are now in a cooling period.Global warming, and cooling, are caused by solar cycles. Yes, the sun has heating and cooling periods. We just entered one of it's colder cycles. The last century of human environmental emissions have contributed perhaps .4 centigrade or something like that. If you want to stop global warming, or cooling, I suggest you go bitch at the sun.
Civix1320 2 years ago 2
Where the heck is my global warming? We need warming now. Thousands of Americans die every winter.
RobertGary1 2 years ago 7
Remember The 70's?
These same scientist, were predicting an Ice Age!
they don't know what the hell's going on!
I wish global warming was true!
We could use another 10-20 Degrees in janurary, Feb & March!
My Gas Bill, About Bankrupted me!
rebelstang 2 years ago 4
You said it, dude!
paperboi007 2 years ago
I bet you could also do with masses of rain, and many people DIEING and needing relocation because rising oceans due to melting ice caps will have destroyed cities. I bet you could also do with unpredictable weather, and massive storms and hurricanes, because these are all effects. Only a complete ignorant retard would think that the only effect of all this shit we are spewing out into the atmosphere will only result in nice sunny days.
Egroeg4 2 years ago
great great great!!
ibbetsonusa 2 years ago
What a couple. Tipper Gore and her PMRC music label hysteria and Al with his global warming hysteria.
metalways 2 years ago
why didn't Al turn his lights off during Earth hour?
kevyster 2 years ago 4
Because Al Gore knows that Global warming is a load of crap.
theanimeradioshow 2 years ago
yep
lucasderraugh 2 years ago
Al Gore: " Life is like a box of melting chocolates, Jenn-ny."
HippiesAreNazis 2 years ago 2
Someone should shove a penguin up Al Gore's ass!
testubexclusive 2 years ago 4
as much I can't stand Al Gore, we shouldn't punish a penguin
kevyster 2 years ago 3
The penguin is innocent!
UTFort 2 years ago 2
With spring coming I'm expecting Algore is going to come out of his hole and start talking about Global Warming again until next winter.
RobertGary1 2 years ago 2
Al is praying a Blizzard doesn't hit Las Vegas during his next Global Warming Conference, which if he really wanted to help, he would would just shut up.
kevyster 2 years ago
This ish very funny.
And yes, Al gore is a douche nozzle.
xDD
You made my day!!
Ange0Pecheur 3 years ago 2
funny as hell
piplup10203854 3 years ago
The global warming convention was canceled last week, due to snow. Al Gore is a douche nozzle.
HarrySeeword 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Update for Tom,Albert & Stew,
I spoke today with an another female agent from Lyon France.
She told me to keep up defending the U.S.Constitution & keep posting Tom's intel reports with the Qui Tam.
I posted the Saturday report to the posting below which is "The Court Case that changes the Entire World"
This agent also showed me a photo of Peter Joyce & Lady Diana & I from 1992 in London.
I want to thank Interpol for working with Tom & Albert.
NoMoreFraud(.)blogspot (.)com
Viva La France
LoveAmericaStyle 3 years ago
TIPPER GORE'S A BITCH
BELACSAMOHT 3 years ago
random but super funny
doublekspartans 3 years ago
Funny, but he didn't run for the 2nd presidency.
kirara2tail 3 years ago
Gore ought to "run" into the ocean and keep on running.
Tweetyspet 3 years ago 2