Added: 4 years ago
From: explounet
Views: 26,098
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (110)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • demo please?

    

  • now that is something that doesnt happen very often.. good one! =D

  • OMFG AMAIZING

  • anyway its an awp, so i have my doubts

  • LUCK OMFG XDXD

  • the bullet cant cross 2 walls,

    to much intro for so shity video

  • @ftorresdiaz Obviously you see you can. Try it your self.

  • Zapraszam na Server Cs-Narc [FFA+BF2]+[FD] Mixowo.xaa.pl IP 91.203.223.84:27513

  • fake

  • haha lucky bastard :D

  • random shot XDXDXDXD

  • GOOD ....

    LOL

  • couldnt you just simply spawn kill...

  • omg how you do that i think you lucky :D

  • I want snack and salsa (:(:(:(:):)::)

  • song i:

  • neVer thats unbelievable :p

  • 2nd music.. Darude - Sandstorm

  • NICE

  • oMfG

  • name of 2nd music

  • haha thats nice

  • WOWOWOWOOWOWOWOWOOWOWO dude the guy must of SAID 1. WTF???? 2. WALLHACKER 3. AIMBOT LOL

  • lol xD

  • ahahahah

  • OMFG

  • no fucking way man!!that like 1 in 100000 shot !!!nice!!!

  • lol bullets go thru anything in that game

  • OMG !

  • Eh, one time, in Dust2, I was going mid as a T, and I jumped by by the double doors to long, and got HS'ed by some lucky guy on Awp (through the wall, not doors).

  • nice man :)

  • LOL

  • he can 2walls with awp.

  • does any one know the name of the 2nd song in this video?

  • darude-sandstorm

  • that was so nice :D

  • go back to source

  • @explounet HAHA agreed ;)

  • Shut up and kiss my ass...

    2 walls are availblee in 1.6...

    So stfu i you dont know the game.

  • with awp he can

  • junglemuffin your such a nobhead.

  • u can

  • in 1.6 you can

  • ROFL

    if u knew anything about 1.6 then you would know there are over 100,000 spam spots to shot in 1.6

  • 100,000 i dont know that might be a little over the top thats more then 10,000 per map ever if there was like 10 per wall on every war map it still would not make 100,000

  • go play source

  • you can shoot through 3 walls with awp

  • Its 2 walls idiot!

  • Its 2 walls=)

  • @junglemuffin

    It is a awp bullet, ofcourse it can

  • @junglemuffin u can with an awp

  • omg lucky guy :) or fake ??

  • pure luck

  • pure?:)

  • Comment removed

  • @markrh2650 fake, in cs 1.6, the wallbang feature, the shots only allows to get through 1 wall, not 2.

    and if it is real, must be a bug, anyway, there's no demo or HLTV link to substantiate the vid

  • Throw two walls? Um... Lucky shit man!

  • dem_record 1. ? :D

  • whats the name of the music

  • BARA TUR HAAHA MEN NCIE_:d

  • haha n1

  • how to you change look in demo ????????

  • LUCKY SHOT LUCKY LUCKY LUCKY LUCKY

  • Omg

    Nice wall shot

    u fake him :/O lol

  • w00t O.o

  • SOng ???? so fkking nice

  • 1.6 is random

  • Haha :D :: D

  • ETO SKILL. ;D

  • wall banging adds another dimension into the game.

  • Source = Spray = Frag

    No need to control recoil?

  • 1.6=shoot=they cant move=frag

    1.6=shoot through random wall=frag

    there are pros in both games that both of us would get owned from. so dont say source is easy even though u would get destroyed against a good team

  • Source-Terrible hitboxes.

    I admit, I'd prolly get owned by pro some source teams. But I'm just saying, the game is easier than 1.6.

    I only like it's graphics, the rest is bad.

  • "It's obviously prettier on the eyes than 1.6, I mean I will always and to this day I will, I will say that I think source is an awful game, I think it plays terribly, I think it looks fantastic. But it drives like crap. Yea, and I mean you know what, that's what it is and all the players will transition, and all the best players in 1.6 will be the best players in source, but they'll be riding around in a junker."

    -Josh "Dominator" Sievers

  • lol... its funny how u categorize ALL of source players playing it because of graphics. i dont play it because of graphics at all. i play it because its more fun to me than 1.6 and i actually like the reg way more in source than 1.6's shitty interp system. and thats my opinion. but dont be ignorant by saying all noobs play source and pros play 1.6. there are pros in both games and they would own you at source and 1.6. BTW that was said by moto, not sievers lol. shows how much of a 1.6 fan u are.

  • if you reread what i wrote, it doesnt categorize all teh source players, it categorizes most of the noobs. most of hte noobs to games will go out and say oh look its newer, it must inevitably be better. have u ever seen a noob go out and buy starcraft over tiberium wars? also, im not totally sure but i think source uses interp too. cl_interp instead of ex_interp. ok, so i was incorrect in crediting the quote. i dont like 3d that much anyways.

  • so why do u care if all of the noobs go play source? they are gonna play in pubs anyways.... the competetive scene should be equally as talented. and yes source also uses interp, but it doesnt effect the reg as much as it does in 1.6. ex_interp 0.1 is illegal in some 1.6 leagues because its "cheap" and allows you to shoot a little in front of the player and get a hit, so u can kill them before they round a corner. you wont find that in source. and 1.6 is full of 16 bitters.

  • well it depends on what you mean by competitive scene. if you mean scrims, there are so many scrubs i know personally that scrim and lose every time. if you mean competitive as in the former cgs players, those are probably equally talented. i have never seen any kind of interp rules in leagues i have played in, and 16 bit gets u an automatic ban in leagues. 0.1 doesnt even make that much of a difference, sometimes its the correct interp setting for the server.

  • clients catch 16 bitters and interpers.

    plus lan leagues is where it is at anyways. don't see much for source.

  • the main thing about source that pisses me off is that every single source player i know in real life goes up to me and says: "why do you play 1.6, the graphics are so bad" those r the scrubs i direct my comments to.

  • amen

  • they call me a noob for playing 1.6...reason...poor graphix...wtf?..i like 1.6 over source anyday...canadian is right. :D

  • there are so many bads in source. this friend of mine is so shitty at cs, he started like 3 months ago and he already got 3 aces in scrims. im just amazed at how shitty source players are. the first time i ever aced in 1.6 was against a main pug, yet that guy is shittier than ogl yet he already has 3 aces. the 1 and only time i ever scrimmed in source, i got an ace. the head hitbox is huge, and source is so easy. gg.

  • @theothercanadian There's a reason for that. Evolution. If you had a hatchet and a chainsaw, which one would you pick, if you wanted to chop down a tree? Maybe graphics doesn't do everything, but Counter-Strike 1.6 hasn't been receiving any major updates for years now. Call me casual, but playing that game in 2011 is just retarded.

  • @TocsDK The violin was first produced 500 years ago. Today it is relatively unchanged, so why do we still use it? A hatchet may seem primitive, but a hatchet won't malfunction. It won't jam, or tell you its out of fuel. Thats why the hatchet hasn't been "updated" often - it works. CS1.6 works, it doesn't need to be updated. At this point, whenever a "major" update hits 1.6, the community reels and valve receives a flood of complaints, because everything was fine the way it was.

  • @theothercanadian Relatively, yet scientists still tries to find the clue of the Stradivarius mystery. If you had piece of forest to chop, you would be damn ass bland to choose the hatchet. If we can't accept the fact that it's been 12 years now, we'll never realize it. Counter-Strike 1.6 has become a desperate attempt to keep things the way, they've always been. I just don't see the logic in that. YouTube is limited to 500 characters, but I could possibly write a book on this.

  • @TocsDK Stradivarius violins are overrated. They weren't the only good ones. Guarneris are also excellent. I don't understand how your comment is relevant.

    If I was honestly going for a whole forest, I'd go for a timberjack. Honestly, there's nothing wrong with keeping something the same. Why do people still play Starcraft, Tetris and even sports like hockey? I don't think the rules of hockey have changed substantially since the students at McGill started it all.

  • @theothercanadian Who said I'd enjoy games like Starcraft today? People played it because there wasn't a sequel coming out. 80% of the Koreans have switched to Starcraft 2 now. Tetris isn't really a competitive game, in the way Counter-Strike and Starcraft is. I don't believe you can win big money by playing Tetris. Maybe the rules of hockey hasn't been changed much, but I believe something has - like the equipment.

  • @TocsDK I never said you would, but many others do. The original Starcraft is much more popular in Korea. The sequel is only more popular in North America. Competition has little to do with enjoyment of a game. Rules of hockey haven't changed, so you want to say we're using better helmets and gear? Well I'm sure people are playing the same old games on better PC's. Your arguments make no sense and are irrational. They getting quite irritating.

  • source is easy xD

    when i play source , i have always the best scores xD

    1.6 is difficult , u need recoil and , and ,and

  • ok, but there are still pro teams in both games that would own the shit out of you. and the pro source teams would beat the pro 1.6 teams in source, and the 1.6 team would beat the source teams in 1.6...... and by how ur talking u sound like a pubber

  • lets just put it this way, all the noobs will goto source, because they just go "oh, it has better graphics therefore it is inevitably going to be a better game". source is horrible, its just prettier on the eyes. the registry isnt pretty at all, and neither is the gameplay. source recoil is so damn low, and the head hitboxes are bigger.

  • n1.. :D

  • o0 lucky on

  • OMG nice one dude :)))

  • roflmao dude that was pretty amazing luck ^^

  • Intro-Eye of the tiger

    End-Sandstorm

  • haha sick.

  • The last song. Darude - sandstorm

  • Haha nice one :D

  • OMFG no way, mega luck :P

  • yeah...this was just luck ;)

  • hahahahahahh

  • Please someone tell me that song in that video, me and my friends always wanted to know this song LOL!!

  • the song in the intro or the one in the end?

  • darude - sandstorm

  • Darude - Sandstorm

  • WOW! i see who you were aiming for though... hrm if i was the guy that got owned i'd think you cheat right away lol

  • lol yeah right no cheat?xD

  • just luck ^^

  • wow great shot...lucker :D

  • Lan =) LOL

  • Very nice HS!! :D Luck, but nice xD

  • Mega luck shot, noob MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE. :D

    very nice 5 stars.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more