"... both aircraft for a global war on terror". Like F-22 participated anywhere... And now when Talibans are US friends again Raptor missed its chance to dominate in skies of Afghanistan...
Like this system! No nasty probe jutting out the front (retractable or not) of the fighter, so no minimal impact on RCS. Its for the tanker to find the hole and stick it in!
It's a good thing the Raptor is considered an easier plane to refuel, because with it's somewhat short legs they'll be gassing it up quite a bit. Even more so the case with the F-35.
@IauthenticI He's no soldier, he's an airman. A pilot. One of the toughest positions to get into in ANY military. So show some respect for the guy that's probably 100 times more adept in every way than you.
@galatasarayfan67 what can you do to me, i am anonymous. i can just tell you to suck my dick and there is absolutely nothing you can do to shame me in society.
that pilot is a liberal douche bag. these a/c are the only reason hes in the air. A.. he didnt make fighter pilot......b didnt make chopper and...c didnt make cargo so now he thinks the world revolves around gas jockies...yet his future is nothing more than wall mart greeter. Ask your self what is a less boring job than yours??? douche!
My father was a KC 135 boom operator in the late 50s/early 60s, when I was just a child. I still recall getting to lie down in the bunks in the boom area, where he worked (while the aircraft was on the ground, of course!)
I don't know how the speaker gets the idea that the F-22 will be used in the war on terror. The Raptor is a great plane and all, but sending it to Afghanistan would be a waste of money and maintenance hours for an expensive publicity stunt.
There are few kc 135 that can be refueled in the air. at my base we have 63 135 and only 8 or have the ability to be refueled in the air. But they hold over 180,000 pounds of fuel so its hardly ever needed
only jealous idiots call it the craptor. Your only excuse for how it sucks is that it cost so much money, and that it needs so much maintenance...Well that's why we have the largest military budget, so that we can easily take care of that stuff. There is absolutely NO credible military analyst that would say that any other fighter could beat the f22. It's not even considered a fair fight.
Pissing contest aside, the Harrier GR7 is one of the few current service jets that hasen't been pitted against the F22. Why? because it would put it to shame! It is more agile, has a greater payload, in the right hands (Royal Navy), it can out smart any other fighter. If you want a demo, whatch some vids on the Faulklands......and before you say "Oh yes but the F22 has stealth technology, the Harrier couldn't even find it". The F22's stealth technology was developed by BAe Systems. The Brits!
lol not quite. What you call "stealth technology" is only a small part of the big picture. The F-22's aveonics are way beyond that of BAE. You need a top secret security clearence just to work on the aveonics. More agile? Again, that's completely untrue. The Raptor has thrust vectoring something no Brit plane can match. BTW the Harrier is being brushed aside for the F-35 joint strike fighter. The F-35, again which is REPLACING the Harrier GR7/GR9 is the downgraded less able version of the F-22.
@ShaneMac777 Heres some facts for you about the F22..against euro systems its not invisible...It cannot match the EF in a thrust to weight scenario...Does not have long range cutting edge RAM Technology missiles, these are European BTW...As for comparing your unproven F35 to a Harrier?..WTF?...Nobody has purchased your F35 yet..But your Navy lot bought into GR5...Clear now?
The Raptor carries AIM-120 AMRAAM mid-long range missiles. BTW the list of countries that already have committed to buy the F-35 is the UK, Italy, Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway, Denmark, Singapore, and Israel. And yes the F-22 is totally invisible to any European fighter. Do you know anything about avionics or are you just playing pretend soldier? I'm in the United States Air Force, I'm not just some pecker wood pretending to know what he's talking about like yourself.
@ShaneMac777 Oh, I see now, your a "grunt"...Well get up to speed, cos yr behind the times...All of the missiles you mentioned are inferior to "Meteor" clearly you know nothing about European Avionics either as such...yr F22 is not "Invisible" OK? Not to our detection systems anyway...As for the F35 mutirole, I believe RR and BAE are helping you guys with this?..And when its done, it still wont do what GR5 can,...like VTOL for instance....only STOL....Ok?...pretend soldier indeed...WTF?
@EnglishTurbines A grunt? That'd be the Army. People that join the military but aren't very intelligent get grunt work. The USAF requires one of the highest applicant test scores just to qualify to join. Not to mention I'm doing Air Traffic Control which is one of the most stressful jobs in the service and held only by elite minds. You are blinded by your patriotism and narcissism towards the US military.
@ShaneMac777 Oh, dont be offended....I meant you dont get to play with the big boy toys, thats all....Millitary ATC? is that like worse than Chicargo O Hare on a busy Monday morning maybe?...Only kidding...:)
It is being used as a deterrent against those that might consider taking advantage of the USA while engaged in the global war on terror. fights that don't happen are the best fights of all. The f22 does to air supremacy what the Nimitz class carrier does to blue water confrontations. to wit, there are none. result? PEACE. Have a nice day.
huh? first its the GLOBAL war on terror, now the Middle East. OK, any likelyhood of Iranian invasion of iraq? viceversa? any probability of REAL war any where in the middle east?The current scene in the midde east is the closest thing to peace the region has ever experienced! The reason? obvious. what is your point?
Iran is building nuclear weapons and two presidents and the UN have given them a pass, Iraq killed THOUSANDS of people and buried them in PITS, Iran's dictator who just stole elections is on the record saying he would destroy a Jewish state and you think the Middle East is the closest thing to peace in the region??? What the hell are you smoking?????????
LOL, that was my whole point re the f22!! You didn,t read the earlier comments that lead to these comments. the F22 is a deterrant while we pursue the war on terror.The issues you mentioned re iraq are history BECAUSE we took out Saddam. I agree with u re IRAN and nukes. Hopefully, the people of Iran take care of the nut themselves,doubt it though.Just checked, the guy I was commenting to, removed his comments, read all the comments next time b4 you get ur dander up, ur preaching to the choir!!
Wrong, the F-35 is not, it's just cheaper. It cost too much to make the F-22. There's no need for such an advanced jet because there's no competition to keep making the jets that advanced. They have decided to make the F-35 which has a single engine, carries less munitions and it's slower than the F-22. F-22 cost $140 million vs the F-35 at the cheaper $83 million per aircraft. F-22 FTW
@frankysnow44 what do you mean the rafale is betterII???? If your rafale were good then why do you french beg on your knees asking to buy f35s from the US besides your rafale isn't stealth and requires afterburners to escape enemy guns.
The KC-10 is an HDLD (High Demand Low Density) asset. There aren't enough to go around the globe and keep us mission effective. That is why the KC-135 is so heavily used to support the air-refueling mission. However it is an old airframe that is requiring more and more dollars per hour to operate as more expensive maintenance is required to keep it flying. That is why we started the KC-X project, to find a tanker to replace the 135 and run at a fraction of the price at the same ops tempo.
I see that redfoxace's comment a thumbs-down but the fact of the matter is that he's right...DoD and congress need to stop their arguing and indecisiveness and just choose which aircraft the KC-X will be...otherwise I'll cry, and you wouldn't want to see me cry
really? ive worked with most of the aircraft in the United States Air Force and the Royal Air Force. And ya the F-16 is very good even though it's very cheap. But it's just "blah". And going into the 21st century the F-16 doesn't really stand a chance against 21st century aircraft.
@USSWISCONSIN64 I was referring to the fact that it's incredibly difficult to dominate the skies. Not all the bad guys are like Saddam, there are much tougher armies out there.
@mhatata91 Ah. Ok. Now that is true point u got there. But u got to think about which air force is superior to others. The USAF is the most advanced and most powerful in the world. And size doesn't matter as much as ling that u have the men and women to back u up and r smart where to put ur soldiers.
@USSWISCONSIN64 Yeah, The USAF is very superior to any other air force. But, they didn't face any real opponent since 1991's 1st Gulf War. The Serbs & The 2003 Iraqis didn't have any modern air defense weaponry, let alone any warplane. What I'm trying to say is that the Zero losses reputation the USAF enjoy, needs to be reviewed..At some point The NAZI Luftwaffe was the strongest one in Europe, but their supremacy vanished in few months.
@mhatata91 that is true. the Luftwaffe was the most powerful in WW2 so was the RAF, and the IJN. but after it ended the USAAF was the most powerful till the USAF was made in 1947. the zero was the most deadly in the pacific but US air power jump because Americas industrial power was rising at the peak of 1944. then it went down cause the war ended. the country that is close to the United States Air Force is i think Russia or China. but that they don't have the tech to do it. maybe they do. idk?
@mhatata91 USAF vs China and russia would be most casualties would be in the millions i bet. but i doubt it. it would maybe USA vs Russia vs China vs the world.
@mhatata91 lol worng america would win they have as much planes as both countries combined and then they have their navy which has another 3700+ aircraft
@ironsaber2 Well, I'm not talking here about the equipment, it's about the resources and the man power..Vietnamese didn't have any serious weapons but they did what they did..in the case of China or Russia, those guys have some serious weapons, they got effective air defenses that might paralyze the US air wing, they can destroy carriers and air bases, they are not anything like Saddam or Qaddafi...it would be a real war.
@mhatata91 well man power yes but air defenses are not air force jobs except for air to air but liek figther on fighter over the ocean battle no ground to air us= complete domination. btw go back to the early 80s and canada would have dominated the Russian air force i mean we had a supply of air to air nukes designed to take out an entire air force battalion in 1 shot
Russia + China vs. USAF and rest of the allied forces = USAF and rest of the allied forces wins by default. Even communist nations have some common sense.
Cobra Jet (or Hobu) got its name from what the Japanese on Okinawa called the SR-71. Ford took the name to its muscle car line production in the 1960s, based on the "flying snake"
One small correction ... not "Hobu," but "Habu," meaning "snake." I was in Okinawa where we got to see the Blackbird SR-71 take off and fly many times. It was the most marvelous plane ever built, in my opinion. It didn't just fly ... it soared. Beautiful.
kadana air forcc 18 jaks Pals jr hiko ooshiro fujitv and contribotio composition Americans EAMI award aprize IRONCHEFA IONADOPTIN mer ice 1417 .. 0986340097
well i want 5.00 on pump ???? uh kc 135!!!!!!!!
ITANHOMI84 3 days ago
Now imagine a war time scenario with bad weather...
If I was sucking vapors I'd much rather be pulling up with a probe like the one on the Rafale and also a boom with the basket that's NOT RIDGED!!!
One can only imagine aerial refueling accidents with both F-22 and F-35 due to the design and ridged boom required.
justincgs 1 week ago
"... both aircraft for a global war on terror". Like F-22 participated anywhere... And now when Talibans are US friends again Raptor missed its chance to dominate in skies of Afghanistan...
BitnikGr 1 week ago
@1:27 ...Anyone notice how the F-22 pilot has a folded American flag tucked to the right of the HUD of his plane?
aussiebear22 3 weeks ago
Like this system! No nasty probe jutting out the front (retractable or not) of the fighter, so no minimal impact on RCS. Its for the tanker to find the hole and stick it in!
mnnh1 3 weeks ago
"global war on terror..." my ass. That's just politics 101, but hey still awesome plane
MentallyRaped 1 month ago
@MentallyRaped yup, noted the same ol' brainwashing -- if they were really fighting terror, they'd head for Tel Aviv, Jew York and Washing Tonne.
mshigorin 1 month ago
F-22 pilot is like pokerface. B|
pacrat90 1 month ago
I can do the same thing on DCS A-10c Warhog, or F-16 Falcon 4.32 BMS :D !
ANLQ84 1 month ago
American flag next to the HUD for the victory lap LOL
SubaruWRXtreme 2 months ago
It's a good thing the Raptor is considered an easier plane to refuel, because with it's somewhat short legs they'll be gassing it up quite a bit. Even more so the case with the F-35.
JimHadar1 2 months ago
@OfficialCrashVideos Yeah that line was priceless...
theeltea 3 months ago
look outn you could be giving free fuel to starscream.
kvnfln9000 3 months ago
I love Kadena, best AFB in the world hands down!!!!
dasaxophonist 4 months ago
That is a good one Noname2903 she is not a virgen anymore.
Brasil1966 4 months ago
"We have a 50 year old tanker refuling a 2 year old F-22..." What a gullible soldier.
IauthenticI 4 months ago
@IauthenticI he'snot really a soldier he's probably a first officer or military pilot
tomibewi 4 months ago
@IauthenticI....soldier really? we are called aiman. and i'm a KC-135 crew chief most of the 135 fleet are 50 years old.
cumminsandcopenhagen 2 months ago
@IauthenticI He's no soldier, he's an airman. A pilot. One of the toughest positions to get into in ANY military. So show some respect for the guy that's probably 100 times more adept in every way than you.
pacrat90 1 month ago
@pacrat90
Calm down Sussie. Take your pick.
Noun: A person who serves in an army.
Verb: Serve as a soldier.
Synonyms: serviceman - warrior - man
IauthenticI 1 month ago
Thans guys, I love this!!
FlyKingRy 6 months ago
a mother breastfeeding her baby
aww... so beautiful
capespring 6 months ago
Boom operator - dick operator xD
FiFiGiN88 7 months ago
has the f22 been cancelled? does america still have any flying? my fav is eurofighter, one of the best fighters in the world, like 2, or 3
Pringles352 7 months ago
@Pringles352
We have a few hundred raptors I believe. They are currently grounded though, with a oxygen system problem, so they say.
normanmj 7 months ago
Can it fly or plane?
zerozas 8 months ago
Gas as in jp-8
whipplek 8 months ago
Chuck Norris was flying that f-22 Raptor!!
whateever876543 9 months ago
@whateever876543 Chuck Norris is that F-22 Raptor
5bStix 8 months ago
fill their tanks with gas ? or kerosene ?
samec666 10 months ago
@samec666
Well, gas is a general term, they do mean kerosene. I guess what they mean is fuel, because petrol and diesal is also called gas.
galatasarayfan67 9 months ago
@galatasarayfan67 gas is short for gasoline dumbass.
cerrutiboy1 6 months ago
@cerrutiboy1
I know, you don't hear people say ''I'm gonna get some diesal'' you hear them say ''I'm gonna get some gas''
When a person says 'gas' he usually means all the types of fuel...
You should really stop insulting people over the internet for very little things and maybe get a life.
galatasarayfan67 6 months ago
@galatasarayfan67 what can you do to me, i am anonymous. i can just tell you to suck my dick and there is absolutely nothing you can do to shame me in society.
cerrutiboy1 6 months ago
@cerrutiboy1
Yeah, I know, I couldn't bring you shame to society even if I wanted to, because you probably have no connections with society.
galatasarayfan67 6 months ago
rule 34 on anything
JRLOC488 1 year ago
prepare for global war on terror ???
charlieechovictor 1 year ago 2
@charlieechovictor yeah, seriously? Shit is global now????
light24bulbs 1 year ago
Yeah i agree. Fighting on the internet is very gay.
boeing7971 1 year ago
the pilot in the f-22 looks like a badass
pilot80920 1 year ago 51
@pilot80920 I think anyone who gets to fly a f-22 is a badass
tanmyman777 6 months ago
@pilot80920 That's because he is.
MrAnarmlessman 5 months ago
fire a missile, now!
siliconsurf 1 year ago
holy crap i gotta study i really wanna do that
kendall3451 1 year ago
@kendall3451 boom operator?
YanYan1337 1 year ago
"global war on terror ? 'terror' ?oh, you mean the Whitehouse
sweetypie000 1 year ago
that pilot is a liberal douche bag. these a/c are the only reason hes in the air. A.. he didnt make fighter pilot......b didnt make chopper and...c didnt make cargo so now he thinks the world revolves around gas jockies...yet his future is nothing more than wall mart greeter. Ask your self what is a less boring job than yours??? douche!
OTULP62 1 year ago
lol 1 dislike :D ahhaha his dick is the size of his vote. lol
redeljann 1 year ago
i think the F-22 lost its virginity
Noname2903 1 year ago 37
@Noname2903 Guess that makes the KC a pedophile...
yellow1247 1 month ago
Give that baby Raptor some go juice!:)
Tammicat21 1 year ago
fuck yeah air force
Getinsideit 1 year ago
Who the hell hated this video? Some peacenik hippie loser?
336kgf 1 year ago
@336kgf Russians/Euros love to hate on F22 videos
blindbubba 1 year ago
@blindbubba Hate when that happens. :P
336kgf 1 year ago
have the kc-135s been refitted with turbofan engines instead of turbo jets?
Farmerpilot13 1 year ago
@Farmerpilot13 I think in the early 90's they started changing them all out.
r1cw 1 year ago
@Farmerpilot13 yes, awhile ago.
RainbowManification 1 year ago
Comment removed
blessthefallmichael 1 year ago
The military loves the in-air gas station.
instructablesderin 2 years ago 2
My father was a KC 135 boom operator in the late 50s/early 60s, when I was just a child. I still recall getting to lie down in the bunks in the boom area, where he worked (while the aircraft was on the ground, of course!)
kinggagkk 2 years ago
lol @ 1:16
I don't know how the speaker gets the idea that the F-22 will be used in the war on terror. The Raptor is a great plane and all, but sending it to Afghanistan would be a waste of money and maintenance hours for an expensive publicity stunt.
dokaw 2 years ago
@dokaw besides stealth ur right but i can also be fitted with bombs under the wing and in the missile bay under it....
DuffusAndDuffy 2 years ago
@dokaw i ment it not i in last message
DuffusAndDuffy 2 years ago
@dokaw not sure if you heard him correctly, but he said 'Training Deployment'
whitewingsrich 1 year ago
So who refuels the KC-135 and fills it with fuel to refuel other jets?
TheGrerex 2 years ago
@TheGrerex Another KC-135 or KC-10
Atlantisfan119 2 years ago
There are few kc 135 that can be refueled in the air. at my base we have 63 135 and only 8 or have the ability to be refueled in the air. But they hold over 180,000 pounds of fuel so its hardly ever needed
Usernamecooldude 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Unofficial nick name given to the f22 by testors "craptor"
Tcstang1 2 years ago
only jealous idiots call it the craptor. Your only excuse for how it sucks is that it cost so much money, and that it needs so much maintenance...Well that's why we have the largest military budget, so that we can easily take care of that stuff. There is absolutely NO credible military analyst that would say that any other fighter could beat the f22. It's not even considered a fair fight.
andrewm153351 2 years ago
Pissing contest aside, the Harrier GR7 is one of the few current service jets that hasen't been pitted against the F22. Why? because it would put it to shame! It is more agile, has a greater payload, in the right hands (Royal Navy), it can out smart any other fighter. If you want a demo, whatch some vids on the Faulklands......and before you say "Oh yes but the F22 has stealth technology, the Harrier couldn't even find it". The F22's stealth technology was developed by BAe Systems. The Brits!
koromikoUK 2 years ago
@koromikoUK Yea, it's also really really REALLY slow. Major disadvantage.
Atlantisfan119 2 years ago
lol not quite. What you call "stealth technology" is only a small part of the big picture. The F-22's aveonics are way beyond that of BAE. You need a top secret security clearence just to work on the aveonics. More agile? Again, that's completely untrue. The Raptor has thrust vectoring something no Brit plane can match. BTW the Harrier is being brushed aside for the F-35 joint strike fighter. The F-35, again which is REPLACING the Harrier GR7/GR9 is the downgraded less able version of the F-22.
ShaneMac777 2 years ago
@ShaneMac777 Heres some facts for you about the F22..against euro systems its not invisible...It cannot match the EF in a thrust to weight scenario...Does not have long range cutting edge RAM Technology missiles, these are European BTW...As for comparing your unproven F35 to a Harrier?..WTF?...Nobody has purchased your F35 yet..But your Navy lot bought into GR5...Clear now?
EnglishTurbines 1 year ago
The Raptor carries AIM-120 AMRAAM mid-long range missiles. BTW the list of countries that already have committed to buy the F-35 is the UK, Italy, Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway, Denmark, Singapore, and Israel. And yes the F-22 is totally invisible to any European fighter. Do you know anything about avionics or are you just playing pretend soldier? I'm in the United States Air Force, I'm not just some pecker wood pretending to know what he's talking about like yourself.
ShaneMac777 1 year ago
@ShaneMac777 Oh, I see now, your a "grunt"...Well get up to speed, cos yr behind the times...All of the missiles you mentioned are inferior to "Meteor" clearly you know nothing about European Avionics either as such...yr F22 is not "Invisible" OK? Not to our detection systems anyway...As for the F35 mutirole, I believe RR and BAE are helping you guys with this?..And when its done, it still wont do what GR5 can,...like VTOL for instance....only STOL....Ok?...pretend soldier indeed...WTF?
EnglishTurbines 1 year ago
@EnglishTurbines A grunt? That'd be the Army. People that join the military but aren't very intelligent get grunt work. The USAF requires one of the highest applicant test scores just to qualify to join. Not to mention I'm doing Air Traffic Control which is one of the most stressful jobs in the service and held only by elite minds. You are blinded by your patriotism and narcissism towards the US military.
ShaneMac777 1 year ago
@ShaneMac777 Oh, dont be offended....I meant you dont get to play with the big boy toys, thats all....Millitary ATC? is that like worse than Chicargo O Hare on a busy Monday morning maybe?...Only kidding...:)
EnglishTurbines 1 year ago
@ShaneMac777 BTW...Take some guitar Lessons...soon.
EnglishTurbines 1 year ago
Straight off of AFN, lol.
Phyrex999 2 years ago
Comment removed
GriffndorK 2 years ago
It is being used as a deterrent against those that might consider taking advantage of the USA while engaged in the global war on terror. fights that don't happen are the best fights of all. The f22 does to air supremacy what the Nimitz class carrier does to blue water confrontations. to wit, there are none. result? PEACE. Have a nice day.
nwtruckerll 2 years ago
Comment removed
GriffndorK 2 years ago
huh? first its the GLOBAL war on terror, now the Middle East. OK, any likelyhood of Iranian invasion of iraq? viceversa? any probability of REAL war any where in the middle east?The current scene in the midde east is the closest thing to peace the region has ever experienced! The reason? obvious. what is your point?
nwtruckerll 2 years ago
Lets see dumbass,
Iran is building nuclear weapons and two presidents and the UN have given them a pass, Iraq killed THOUSANDS of people and buried them in PITS, Iran's dictator who just stole elections is on the record saying he would destroy a Jewish state and you think the Middle East is the closest thing to peace in the region??? What the hell are you smoking?????????
joelrthomas 2 years ago
PEACE! because we have the weapons to avoid war.
Dumbshit.
joelrthomas 2 years ago
LOL, that was my whole point re the f22!! You didn,t read the earlier comments that lead to these comments. the F22 is a deterrant while we pursue the war on terror.The issues you mentioned re iraq are history BECAUSE we took out Saddam. I agree with u re IRAN and nukes. Hopefully, the people of Iran take care of the nut themselves,doubt it though.Just checked, the guy I was commenting to, removed his comments, read all the comments next time b4 you get ur dander up, ur preaching to the choir!!
nwtruckerll 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
F-22 the greatest air superioty fighter ever.
airforcex15 2 years ago 38
@airforcex15 F-35 now
AH64RAPTOR 1 year ago
@AH64RAPTOR
Wrong, the F-35 is not, it's just cheaper. It cost too much to make the F-22. There's no need for such an advanced jet because there's no competition to keep making the jets that advanced. They have decided to make the F-35 which has a single engine, carries less munitions and it's slower than the F-22. F-22 cost $140 million vs the F-35 at the cheaper $83 million per aircraft. F-22 FTW
ahnubis 1 year ago
@airforcex15 the french rafale is better :)
frankysnow44 11 months ago
@airforcex15 the french rafale is better :)
frankysnow44 11 months ago
@frankysnow44 what do you mean the rafale is betterII???? If your rafale were good then why do you french beg on your knees asking to buy f35s from the US besides your rafale isn't stealth and requires afterburners to escape enemy guns.
RobertsDigital 11 months ago
@airforcex15 Could have said it better myself!
aandc2005 10 months ago
KC-135 is half a century old and desperately needs to be replaced.
RedFoxAce 2 years ago
It has, it's called the KC-10. Bigger fuel capacity.
pilot7893 2 years ago
Nah, KC-45 by Airbus/EADS/Northrop =P
I would have liked Boeing to put out a 777 civilian derivative, though
RedFoxAce 2 years ago
The KC-10 is an HDLD (High Demand Low Density) asset. There aren't enough to go around the globe and keep us mission effective. That is why the KC-135 is so heavily used to support the air-refueling mission. However it is an old airframe that is requiring more and more dollars per hour to operate as more expensive maintenance is required to keep it flying. That is why we started the KC-X project, to find a tanker to replace the 135 and run at a fraction of the price at the same ops tempo.
C4CHopeless 2 years ago
that's why the Air Force is trying to replace it. there are 2 companies fighting for that spot. Northrope Grumman and Airbus.
futuref22pilot 2 years ago
Check your intel...I"m pretty sure Boeing has a place at the competitive table...
viperfixr 2 years ago
OMG sorry, you're right it's boeing!!! can't believe that i typed that!!! thanks for the correction :)
futuref22pilot 2 years ago
But Northrope Grumman is said to be producing it. not really sure though.
futuref22pilot 2 years ago
I see that redfoxace's comment a thumbs-down but the fact of the matter is that he's right...DoD and congress need to stop their arguing and indecisiveness and just choose which aircraft the KC-X will be...otherwise I'll cry, and you wouldn't want to see me cry
tommytmt 2 years ago
I like the F-22, but I think the F-16 is the coolest plane.
KISSArmy110 2 years ago 3
im with u
governmentpilot016 2 years ago
really? ive worked with most of the aircraft in the United States Air Force and the Royal Air Force. And ya the F-16 is very good even though it's very cheap. But it's just "blah". And going into the 21st century the F-16 doesn't really stand a chance against 21st century aircraft.
ihavtugo 2 years ago
Even though F-14 tomcat is retired I think that is one of the best and coolest planes ever. Of course f-22 owns the sky now though :)
OlderG0ds 2 years ago 3
true dat f-16 is kool
RyVo2ALL 2 years ago
F-35 is replacing that though.
100PercentJoseph 2 years ago
Here's a thought:
F-22 Raptors
"Because kicking your ass with the F-15 and F-16 for 30 years got boring!"
CALanceGokongwei 2 years ago 2
lol fighting on the internet is gay..
0d1l1d0 3 years ago 30
@0d1l1d0 its not a fight the airforce is the youngest branch of the milatary so the other branches make fun of the young ones!
blessthefallmichael 1 year ago
@blessthefallmichael but the Air force kicks their ass cause AF has the Air and if u have the sky. u have the whole area.
USSWISCONSIN64 1 year ago
@USSWISCONSIN64 That's a big fucking "if"
mhatata91 1 year ago
@mhatata91 so why r u replying to me?
USSWISCONSIN64 1 year ago
@USSWISCONSIN64 I was referring to the fact that it's incredibly difficult to dominate the skies. Not all the bad guys are like Saddam, there are much tougher armies out there.
mhatata91 1 year ago
@mhatata91 Ah. Ok. Now that is true point u got there. But u got to think about which air force is superior to others. The USAF is the most advanced and most powerful in the world. And size doesn't matter as much as ling that u have the men and women to back u up and r smart where to put ur soldiers.
USSWISCONSIN64 1 year ago
@USSWISCONSIN64 Yeah, The USAF is very superior to any other air force. But, they didn't face any real opponent since 1991's 1st Gulf War. The Serbs & The 2003 Iraqis didn't have any modern air defense weaponry, let alone any warplane. What I'm trying to say is that the Zero losses reputation the USAF enjoy, needs to be reviewed..At some point The NAZI Luftwaffe was the strongest one in Europe, but their supremacy vanished in few months.
mhatata91 1 year ago
@mhatata91 that is true. the Luftwaffe was the most powerful in WW2 so was the RAF, and the IJN. but after it ended the USAAF was the most powerful till the USAF was made in 1947. the zero was the most deadly in the pacific but US air power jump because Americas industrial power was rising at the peak of 1944. then it went down cause the war ended. the country that is close to the United States Air Force is i think Russia or China. but that they don't have the tech to do it. maybe they do. idk?
USSWISCONSIN64 1 year ago
@USSWISCONSIN64 Well, Personally I think the following
USAF Vs China AF would result in an American victory with some losses on both sides.
USAF Vs Russian AF would result in an American victory with heavy casualties and losses on both sides.
USAF Vs China+ Russia AFs would result in an American Defeat with huge losses & casualties especially on the US side.
mhatata91 1 year ago
@mhatata91 USAF vs China and russia would be most casualties would be in the millions i bet. but i doubt it. it would maybe USA vs Russia vs China vs the world.
USSWISCONSIN64 1 year ago
@mhatata91 lol worng america would win they have as much planes as both countries combined and then they have their navy which has another 3700+ aircraft
ironsaber2 11 months ago
@ironsaber2 Well, I'm not talking here about the equipment, it's about the resources and the man power..Vietnamese didn't have any serious weapons but they did what they did..in the case of China or Russia, those guys have some serious weapons, they got effective air defenses that might paralyze the US air wing, they can destroy carriers and air bases, they are not anything like Saddam or Qaddafi...it would be a real war.
mhatata91 11 months ago 2
@mhatata91 well man power yes but air defenses are not air force jobs except for air to air but liek figther on fighter over the ocean battle no ground to air us= complete domination. btw go back to the early 80s and canada would have dominated the Russian air force i mean we had a supply of air to air nukes designed to take out an entire air force battalion in 1 shot
ironsaber2 11 months ago
@mhatata91
Russia + China vs. USAF and rest of the allied forces = USAF and rest of the allied forces wins by default. Even communist nations have some common sense.
IauthenticI 8 months ago
Cobra Jet (or Hobu) got its name from what the Japanese on Okinawa called the SR-71. Ford took the name to its muscle car line production in the 1960s, based on the "flying snake"
default99telecom 3 years ago
Where did Ford get the name for the Pinto ? Beans ?
1947Chief 3 years ago
One small correction ... not "Hobu," but "Habu," meaning "snake." I was in Okinawa where we got to see the Blackbird SR-71 take off and fly many times. It was the most marvelous plane ever built, in my opinion. It didn't just fly ... it soared. Beautiful.
dorsy2 3 years ago
raptor bery bery cool fighter!!
JapaneseEagle204 3 years ago 3
I work with both of those booms; flown with Yarbough. It's funny to see them on YouTube.
Tofutacular 4 years ago
Haha I can immagine.
What is the "Coolest" thing you have ever done?
IT--
sadekgheidan 3 years ago
The coolest things are always those you can't talk about.
Tofutacular 3 years ago
Heh well, you've got a point there.
I once interviewed Jeff Latas (Former F-15 pilot - He has a Wikipedia page) and he gave me the exact same answer.
What was your job exactly if I may ask?
I am very interested since I want to join the Airforce.
IT--
sadekgheidan 3 years ago
hi JAKS pals Jr F22
hikomiu553 4 years ago
kadana air forcc 18 jaks Pals jr hiko ooshiro fujitv and contribotio composition Americans EAMI award aprize IRONCHEFA IONADOPTIN mer ice 1417 .. 0986340097
hikomiu553 4 years ago
The person reporting it is todd hunter lol and its on right now the island news break lol.
rodgerjohnson 4 years ago
Ha Ha those planes had to turn back to Hwi after they crassed the International datline.
The F-22 Will not play a role in The WoT It is stricly an Air-to-Air fighter.
Floridaman98 4 years ago
Depends on how the war on terror goes. If anyone ever finds that Iran is developing nuklear weapons it would play a role in crushing Irans airforce.
devinhallsworth 3 years ago
redneck.
And it's "nuclear" not nuklear.
sadekgheidan 3 years ago
Bite me. :p
devinhallsworth 3 years ago
No I won't "Bite you".
You sir are a warmonger.
How old are you? 15?
sadekgheidan 3 years ago
We don't need F-22s to "crush" Iran's Air Force. And it won't ever happen, anyway.
Tofutacular 3 years ago
@Floridaman98 It ain't a Air to Air plane only, it can drop JDAMs an SBDs, still it doesn't have the power of an A-10, for example, on CAS missions.
Stover36 1 year ago