Of course the Elamites were indigenous to Iran by the time writing was invented, but linguistic surveys of the Elamite language reveal a high frequency of correlates between the vocabulary of the Dravidian family. Everybody came from somewhere, unless you come from some part of Africa.
I replied to a question in this thread in order to impart what I've studied, not to shove some politicized self-fellating mantra down anyone's throat.
@nsa04 Sure, when u want to make differences between the people of the World than u must call them Hamitic not Semitic, the tribes of Sam are the followers of Jews, the followers Ham Arabs. However we have also differences between the Arabs, Arabs of Syria or Mesopotamia are different than those in Egypt. Today the whole region is Islamic & that´s what is important. By the way the Indo-asian are people in Syria, Libanon, Iraq & Saudi Arabia too. Prophet Mohammed (SA) was Aryan, that means Noble.
@aJa7 u want to say that u know more than the scientiest in this video? ilam is today a province in iran and the province capital is also ilam. persians are part of iran like elamites and many other peoples. don´t try speak out what zionist regime wants.
@aJa7 archaeological studies and discoveries indicate 6,000 years of tribal residence in Ilam. Historical evidence indicates that Ilam province was part of the ancient Elamite Empire. The Ilamians named their territory Hetamiti, meaning the land of god
@ardalanhamrah Excuse me but some say the Elamites were not Aryans but something else and another race. Is this true and what sceintists have shown this.
@Natalie851000 The Elamites spoke a non indo-european language isolate which has nothing to do with the Aryans, Persians, or Medians, who appear in Iranian history somewhat later. Because of the uniqueness of the Elamite language it is still poorly understood. Elamite culture had a very profound influence on the early Achaemenid state, and Elamite was used as a language for administrative documents. a study of Elamite vocabulary suggests it may have a connection to the Dravidian languages.
@Natalie851000 No. Speaking as someone studying this subject in an academic setting, that's simply not what's happening in Elam.
There's a lot of evidence to suggest that the Dravidians were present as far north as Pakistan (and perhaps beyond) and later migrated south. The most likely explanation for the Indus civilization writing system is based on Dravidian. The Indus Valley civilization was clearly trading with Sumer and with Elam. A connection between Elamite and Indus language is probable
@Natalie851000 Secondly, Elamite doesn't have a connection to any indo-european language otherwise, believe me, we would be able to actually understand it intelligibly by this point. Elamite influenced the Achaemenid indo-european speaking populations and vice versa, which has aided us in translating the language, but otherwise it's somewhat obscure.
@Rookilius Yes but that is not true. Otherwise it would not have been called Iranian. Even my old father
told me about the Elamites and Susa. It is the Zionist attempt to distort and to racially degrade the Aryans
and call them anything they were not. They were Aryans and Indo - Iranians.
One I know or knew told me about this and these very laughable claims, makes no Iranian with some brains, wonder if it is not propaganda from somewhere from enemies who like to distort the
@Natalie851000 Thirdly, why are you so upset that the Indo-European aspects of Iranian culture may be, slightly, younger than you'd like to imagine? The antiquity of something doesn't equal its authenticity, it's a fallacious argument. The fact that the Indo-European populations of Iran established a vast and glorious culture so quickly is incredible in and of itself. Who cares who did what first? The issues of today's politics simply are not that of 800 B.C.
IRAN and PERSIA are the same for retards who dont know!
ahriman46 4 months ago
Kurds will be back :)
PurePerceptionRecord 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PurePerceptionRecord what the fuck are you on about?
ahriman46 4 months ago
@PurePerceptionRecord THIS IS NOT with kurds so ehmm stfu noob
iappleshahh 3 months ago
@famemonster1993
Yes, you're right. There aren't proven evidences that shows the Elamites were Semitics and also they aren't Persian.
thanks to comments
nsa04 7 months ago
@famemonster1993 Read a fucking book, Jesus Christ.
Of course the Elamites were indigenous to Iran by the time writing was invented, but linguistic surveys of the Elamite language reveal a high frequency of correlates between the vocabulary of the Dravidian family. Everybody came from somewhere, unless you come from some part of Africa.
I replied to a question in this thread in order to impart what I've studied, not to shove some politicized self-fellating mantra down anyone's throat.
Rookilius 7 months ago
summerians belong to iran not those iraqi arab fucker.
persianaryan12 7 months ago
@persianaryan12 SUMMER IS HISTORY OF IRAN NOT OF FUCKIN ARABIA
halve of iraq belongs to iran
iappleshahh 3 months ago
Elamites were the first inhabitants of India. Then other SemItic people came in & Mixed with the Elamites
dwalkerdon234 8 months ago
@dwalkerdon234
india was created by niggers.
persianaryan12 7 months ago
I thought the Elamite are Semitics not Indo-Asia people, aren't they?
nsa04 1 year ago
@nsa04 Sure, when u want to make differences between the people of the World than u must call them Hamitic not Semitic, the tribes of Sam are the followers of Jews, the followers Ham Arabs. However we have also differences between the Arabs, Arabs of Syria or Mesopotamia are different than those in Egypt. Today the whole region is Islamic & that´s what is important. By the way the Indo-asian are people in Syria, Libanon, Iraq & Saudi Arabia too. Prophet Mohammed (SA) was Aryan, that means Noble.
dawood6karbalai 1 year ago
Ilam is not Iran.
Ilam is Ilam. The Kingdom of Ilam has nothing to do with persians or even the Iran which is today known, notice that.
aJa7 1 year ago
@aJa7 u want to say that u know more than the scientiest in this video? ilam is today a province in iran and the province capital is also ilam. persians are part of iran like elamites and many other peoples. don´t try speak out what zionist regime wants.
Zohor13 1 year ago
@aJa7 Ilam is one of the 30 provinces of Iran. It is in the south-west of the country, bordering Iraq. Its provincial center is the city of Ilam.
celinearcheo 1 year ago
@aJa7 archaeological studies and discoveries indicate 6,000 years of tribal residence in Ilam. Historical evidence indicates that Ilam province was part of the ancient Elamite Empire. The Ilamians named their territory Hetamiti, meaning the land of god
celinearcheo 1 year ago
@aJa7 By immigration of Aryans and establishment of Aryan kingdoms, Ilam became a part of their territory. It was also part of the Achaemenid Empire.
celinearcheo 1 year ago
@celinearcheo doesn´t matter, aryans, are god loving people and the Hakhamaneshian, means Hakha mind, Hakha is one names of God.
ardalanhamrah 1 year ago
@ardalanhamrah Excuse me but some say the Elamites were not Aryans but something else and another race. Is this true and what sceintists have shown this.
Natalie851000 11 months ago
@Natalie851000 The Elamites spoke a non indo-european language isolate which has nothing to do with the Aryans, Persians, or Medians, who appear in Iranian history somewhat later. Because of the uniqueness of the Elamite language it is still poorly understood. Elamite culture had a very profound influence on the early Achaemenid state, and Elamite was used as a language for administrative documents. a study of Elamite vocabulary suggests it may have a connection to the Dravidian languages.
Rookilius 8 months ago
@Rookilius Yes that is ZIONIST PROPAGANDA. Dravids are from Southern India and have nothing to do
with Iran. They were Indo - Aryans. One of my friends told me and he is educated.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Natalie851000 No. Speaking as someone studying this subject in an academic setting, that's simply not what's happening in Elam.
There's a lot of evidence to suggest that the Dravidians were present as far north as Pakistan (and perhaps beyond) and later migrated south. The most likely explanation for the Indus civilization writing system is based on Dravidian. The Indus Valley civilization was clearly trading with Sumer and with Elam. A connection between Elamite and Indus language is probable
Rookilius 8 months ago
@Natalie851000 Secondly, Elamite doesn't have a connection to any indo-european language otherwise, believe me, we would be able to actually understand it intelligibly by this point. Elamite influenced the Achaemenid indo-european speaking populations and vice versa, which has aided us in translating the language, but otherwise it's somewhat obscure.
Rookilius 8 months ago
@Rookilius Yes but that is not true. Otherwise it would not have been called Iranian. Even my old father
told me about the Elamites and Susa. It is the Zionist attempt to distort and to racially degrade the Aryans
and call them anything they were not. They were Aryans and Indo - Iranians.
One I know or knew told me about this and these very laughable claims, makes no Iranian with some brains, wonder if it is not propaganda from somewhere from enemies who like to distort the
history of ...
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Rookilius ... the Aryans. not only do they distort the Aryans, but also all other ancient civilazations and
call them SEMITIC just to replace the buduin wild barbarian Arabs somewhere in history.
They ruined ancient civilazations and they cannot speak the language of their ancestors because some
wild ARABS, attacked and forced them t be Arabs and Persians had to submit into the brutality of Islam
which in soo many ways, have mentally damaged them in finding their true Aryan race and roots
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Natalie851000 Thirdly, why are you so upset that the Indo-European aspects of Iranian culture may be, slightly, younger than you'd like to imagine? The antiquity of something doesn't equal its authenticity, it's a fallacious argument. The fact that the Indo-European populations of Iran established a vast and glorious culture so quickly is incredible in and of itself. Who cares who did what first? The issues of today's politics simply are not that of 800 B.C.
Rookilius 8 months ago
@Rookilius Because it is NOT TRUE. How would you feel if someone distorted your history ha.
And why can't you people not leave IRAN alone just because you people are soo fucking hot burning jelous
if Iran has got such a long term civilazation. I am pretty sure if Iran was not located where it is, they might
have had more which has been stolen, destroyed and sold out.
It is BULLSHIT to distort the history of others if not they race mix and you steal from their history.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@Rookilius I cannot stand back and sa, oh steal my history and fuck my race and lands. Oh please do that.
I am fucking sick of people who distort history I cannot take it. If not they racially degrade Aryans because
they are soo jelous.
Natalie851000 8 months ago
@aJa7
but its in present day iran you dumbass.
persianaryan12 7 months ago
Thank you Ardalan Hamrah. Would it ne possible to have more of such clips covering other periods of Iran's history (at least the pre-Islamic times)?
BachehMirdamad 1 year ago