Great advice and very useful tutorial. You could do with a better video editor and cinematographer though. The video is a little shaky and not that pleasant to watch!
Jeez... It's a clip from 2008, he says he uses a MkIII and a II.. And stop whinning about saying the wrong specs for the 70-200.. Instead try and learn.
Jeez... It's a clip from 2008, he says he uses a MkIII and a II.. And stop whinning about saying the wrong specs for the 70-200.. Instead try and learn.
@ihateyaacov NIKON. . hands down, Both the D3 and 3s are superior to anything Canon has. ISO performance in HS gyms is the means test. Also, combined w/ a 200 f2 and you are set. Of course, Canon users may not agree :)
I detect some sarcasm regarding the Mark III's quality from Mr. How. Strange that everyone complains about them but it's still the standard sports photographer's camera right now.
That's the 70-200mm f/2.8L iS. The 80-200mm f/2.8 lens was black. (Check Wikipedia) The70-200mm f/2.8L came out in 1995, the IS version in 2001. This clip is most definitely post-2001, given that he has a 1D Mk II.
The simplest explanation is that he made a mistake.
Fetthunderdome, one cannot say they "suck". ALL teleconverters affect image quality one way or another. Many lenses accept extenders very nicely, like the 400 2.8 IS. Others, like lenses with less sharpness and contrast, accept the 1.4x well, but really comprimise image quality with the 2x teleconverter. Like Harry mentions, use the teleconverters sparingly, as they do negatively affect image quality, especially sharpness and contrast.
if you have ever worked with a L telephoto lens you would not talk like that about canon. I am super stoked about the imagequality of the L lenses! the 2xtk II is good, in combination with a 300 2.8 IS for example it´s awesome!!!
Any current Canon EOS digital camera can fit to use on this lens, its heavy peace of lens but who's gonna hand held a 400mm lens? even Shwarzeneger will get cramps hand holding this. Anyhow yes you can use any eos dslr on this lens with a tripod or a monopod though.
He does not own that equipment, Getty Images own it. Do you think Getty lets every photographer keep the gear after letting them go for whatever reason?
If you worked for Mercedez Benz and left, do you think you would be driving away in a Benz? c'mon now people.
Actually some company like Getty allowing to loan the camera gears to the photographers who work for them, taking it bit by bit from their pay check until they paid it off.
How are you able to get passes to photograph for events?
I usually network with people and I'm able to slip right threw without having a pass, but just incase I'm on an assignment and I don't have connections for that event, how would I be able to receive one?
Every major event normally has a press-officer or PR. You'd need to contact them. Beware however, they normally only allow photographers who can bring some publication to the event. Depending on the size of the event, depends on which publication they see fit.
You lose a stop with teleconverters? I always thought that they cut the maximum aperture in half; so 2.8 becomes 5.6, 4 becomes 8 etc. Or have I understood wrong?
"You lose a stop with teleconverters? I always thought that they cut the maximum aperture in half"
Those two statements contradict themselves. a 1.4 converter will cut your max. aperture from 2.8 to 4. You are losing a stop of light. If your max aperture on the lens is 4, you would go to 5.6.
Probably. He did say "latest quote 'greatest' Canon" bodies. Safe to assume he had AF problems before shooting this video because he doesn't seem to thrilled to have these so called "latest and 'greatest' Canon cameras."
Great advice and very useful tutorial. You could do with a better video editor and cinematographer though. The video is a little shaky and not that pleasant to watch!
NUVFX 3 months ago
how much earns a sport photographer?
albulescucosmin17 1 year ago 7
Part 2 is better than part 1.
RedWine2go 1 year ago 5
surprised his lappy wasnt a mac. LOL
LTflipnote 1 year ago 10
I would like to know where I can get this "pad" for the monopod? the monopod itself is already purchased! :D
Flygvapnet 1 year ago
It would be helpful to tell the name of the tripod to the audiance :) I guess it is a NEOPOD N 84 but not sure. ;)
Flygvapnet 1 year ago
Comment removed
silaroongreangsri 1 year ago
Jeez... It's a clip from 2008, he says he uses a MkIII and a II.. And stop whinning about saying the wrong specs for the 70-200.. Instead try and learn.
Solidandras 1 year ago
Jeez... It's a clip from 2008, he says he uses a MkIII and a II.. And stop whinning about saying the wrong specs for the 70-200.. Instead try and learn.
Solidandras 1 year ago
canon or nikon for sports!!
ihateyaacov 1 year ago
@ihateyaacov Nikon. They have better focusing.
DirtyGhettoKids24 1 year ago
canon or nikon for sports!!
ihateyaacov 1 year ago
canon or nikon for sports!!?!?!?!
ihateyaacov 1 year ago
@ihateyaacov NIKON. . hands down, Both the D3 and 3s are superior to anything Canon has. ISO performance in HS gyms is the means test. Also, combined w/ a 200 f2 and you are set. Of course, Canon users may not agree :)
HMFRiverdale 1 year ago
nikon d90 good for sports photography or are canons better?
ihateyaacov 1 year ago
@ihateyaacov if you can not afford a Nikon D300(s) go with Canons 50D because of the fps
VSVFAN1212 1 year ago
@ihateyaacov if you can not afford a Nikon D300(s) go with Canons 50D because of the fps
VSVFAN1212 1 year ago
nikon d90 good for sports photography or are canons better?
ihateyaacov 1 year ago
at 7:05, that sure is a long time without the cap on.......have fun with the dust mate
sarzamineiran 1 year ago
uhhh, dude you forgot to put film in the camera
genophoto 1 year ago
uhhh, dude you forgot to put film in the camera
genophoto 1 year ago
uhhh, dude you forgot to put film in the camera
genophoto 1 year ago
uhhh, dude you forgot to put film in the camera
genophoto 1 year ago
uhhh, dude you forgot to put film in the camera
genophoto 1 year ago
uhhh, dude you forgot to put film in the camera
genophoto 1 year ago
Does anyone know the name of that UDMA card reader?
lew1310 2 years ago
Does anyone know the name of that UDMA card reader?
lew1310 2 years ago
why would you have 2 body's I dont get it..
wouterthebmxer 2 years ago
Does anyone know the name of the UDMA card reader?
lew1310 2 years ago
what does a converter do?
dansken92 2 years ago
if you like to make any good photo JUST DO WHAT THIS GUY TELL YOU TO DO
vreeke777 2 years ago
That lens is massive.
zzxzqwq 2 years ago
free camera bodies? : D sign me up!
SteU4IA 2 years ago
Can't believe that I watched the whole video of 9 minutes.. Sure is interesting for an amateur like me. lol :D
JoostyBoy 2 years ago 77
@JoostyBoy i know that is so true i can be on here for an hour watching others camera gear :)
thebigshelby 1 year ago
is that the 70-200 IS? or not
theSZ73 2 years ago
seems to... you have 4 switches on it... AF/MF, MFD, IS ON/OFF, IS Mode
AndreaPontPhoto 2 years ago
noo, the 70-200 is much smaller.
wolfpaws94 2 years ago
no, lens size
lukesullivan2525 2 years ago
Are you really a photography!!
When you are showing off your lens you said you have a 17 to 35 lens.
Canon does not make a 17 to 35 lens. Did you steal the equipment ?
Canon makes a 17 to 40 and 16 to 35 !
pantiesfuck12 2 years ago
it'n not quite correct, because canon produced a 17-35 2.8. it's the same age of the 28-70 2.8 ... still not in production but very very good lenses.
17-35 2.8 has been replaced now from the "top-of-choice" 16-35 2.8 and from the "economically choice" 17-40 4.
cheers
AndreaPontPhoto 2 years ago 2
before the 16-35 mark one you got a 17-35 f2.8 and no 17-40. before that a 20-35 f2.8
ivh009 2 years ago
wow this guy's really cool, I'd like to meet him one day. Also some Excellent gear hes got there!
Desolatorx2 2 years ago
I detect some sarcasm regarding the Mark III's quality from Mr. How. Strange that everyone complains about them but it's still the standard sports photographer's camera right now.
Tykell 2 years ago
I'd hardly say it's the standard. I see more 4 year old Mark IIn's than I do Mark III's almost anywhere I go.
rchelifreak 2 years ago
lucky lucky guy :)
very talented too
mattutubematt 2 years ago
dude you are pro photographer how can u servive with a PC!??! they are not the right computer for photo editing
lfshannu 2 years ago
its 70-200 not 80-200
jormis95 2 years ago
incorrect, he is talking about one of the previous models of that lens, which was 80-200mm
WhiterDeath 2 years ago
@WhiterDeath:
That's the 70-200mm f/2.8L iS. The 80-200mm f/2.8 lens was black. (Check Wikipedia) The70-200mm f/2.8L came out in 1995, the IS version in 2001. This clip is most definitely post-2001, given that he has a 1D Mk II.
The simplest explanation is that he made a mistake.
gslusher 2 years ago 18
@gslusher
Seeing how his Dodgers credential was for 2008 it's definitely post-2001.
Suomilainenmax 2 years ago
he says I use a 1D Mark !!! and a Mark II
lorikzzz 2 years ago
he has 2 1D Mark III-s
lorikzzz 2 years ago
did you watch the video to the end cause he uses 2 1D mark III-s and in the end he says 70-200 2.8 he did a mistake in the beginning
lorikzzz 2 years ago
@gslusher It's 2008 - when he's showing his credentials, they say year 2008 on them :)
ajlepisto 1 year ago
@gslusher
It's wierd cause Zack Arias always makes the same mistake with his 70-200.
Oscar3dM 1 year ago
@gslusher did you really say check wikipedia? wikipedia can be changed by anyone with a computer. Never backup what you say with check wikipedia
sirsh0talot 1 year ago
whats a monopod?
yyyy2999 2 years ago
a tripod - minus 2 legs.
j2willi4 2 years ago
I really appreciate it for making an effort for this video. Nice gear!!!
kenfrancis74 2 years ago
Fetthunderdome, one cannot say they "suck". ALL teleconverters affect image quality one way or another. Many lenses accept extenders very nicely, like the 400 2.8 IS. Others, like lenses with less sharpness and contrast, accept the 1.4x well, but really comprimise image quality with the 2x teleconverter. Like Harry mentions, use the teleconverters sparingly, as they do negatively affect image quality, especially sharpness and contrast.
voltlord 2 years ago
canon TC completely sucks and destroy the already poor sharpness of canon lenses.
fetthunderdome 2 years ago
That's a load of bunk. You obviously know nothing about Canon lenses or their TCs.
RikWriter 2 years ago
if you have ever worked with a L telephoto lens you would not talk like that about canon. I am super stoked about the imagequality of the L lenses! the 2xtk II is good, in combination with a 300 2.8 IS for example it´s awesome!!!
FDPictures 2 years ago
i prefer monopods wich have a head wich can move up and down. for bikes they're better
fetthunderdome 2 years ago
link to this monopod pls
norm86peterson 2 years ago
Hi Harry, Do you recommoned a canon 30D with your lens 400. 2.8? Thanks
S8clothing 2 years ago
Any current Canon EOS digital camera can fit to use on this lens, its heavy peace of lens but who's gonna hand held a 400mm lens? even Shwarzeneger will get cramps hand holding this. Anyhow yes you can use any eos dslr on this lens with a tripod or a monopod though.
rustynasty143 2 years ago
if you can afford a 400 2.8 dude buy a 1D even if second hand mark II. the 30D won't justify that lens.
ivh009 2 years ago
Lenses are more important that the cameras you mount on them.
ConstantlyQuestion 2 years ago 3
Very well stated.
PITTSBURGHFANFOREVER 2 years ago
that 400 2.8 is a massive peice of glass
thetttttttttttt 2 years ago
Hey people...
He does not own that equipment, Getty Images own it. Do you think Getty lets every photographer keep the gear after letting them go for whatever reason?
If you worked for Mercedez Benz and left, do you think you would be driving away in a Benz? c'mon now people.
VeeZeeB 2 years ago
Ya they all have getty stickesr on them.
ajlepisto 2 years ago
Actually some company like Getty allowing to loan the camera gears to the photographers who work for them, taking it bit by bit from their pay check until they paid it off.
rustynasty143 2 years ago
holy snap, he gets the cameras from getty, nice!
roger767 3 years ago
What do you think about the Body Mount Supporter ( CameraEQM ) when doing sport photography for your heavy lenses ?
Linayaya 3 years ago
Do you keep the gear after you have resigned or quit the job?
plz press reply button
thanks!
conoramoia 3 years ago
no they don't
themarsta 2 years ago
He said the bodies were "issued to" him , so I would assume yes. If you're freelance and own your own stuff you keep it obviously.
macman13 2 years ago
uh does he just put his camera back into the bag with the lens mount open?
littletallon 3 years ago 3
How are you able to get passes to photograph for events?
I usually network with people and I'm able to slip right threw without having a pass, but just incase I'm on an assignment and I don't have connections for that event, how would I be able to receive one?
Thanks and nice vid!
AllAmericanGuy01 3 years ago 2
Every major event normally has a press-officer or PR. You'd need to contact them. Beware however, they normally only allow photographers who can bring some publication to the event. Depending on the size of the event, depends on which publication they see fit.
scaredweepel 3 years ago
in order to get a press pass you need a news paper or wire service to back you up and say that you are covering the event for them.
legendsfell 3 years ago
awsome, straight to the point. nice
61862006 3 years ago
Do anyone know what type of Velbon momopod he is using??
ClaasPhoto 3 years ago
I think is Velbon Sherpa Pro Pod CF-7 Monopod !?
gixxer4646 3 years ago
Sick gear! I may be able to afford the bag or monopod, lol :-) j/k
Actually plan to add the 70-200mm f/2.8 to my collection next :-)
Hybrid93Hatch 3 years ago
Well, the bag and monopod combine for half the cost of a used 70-200 ....so maybe not.
I bought the Airport Security V2 a few months ago and it was $380.00
jknightglfr 3 years ago
im getting the 70-200mm 2.8 also. are you goin IS or non?
theone2225 3 years ago
You lose a stop with teleconverters? I always thought that they cut the maximum aperture in half; so 2.8 becomes 5.6, 4 becomes 8 etc. Or have I understood wrong?
flipwhiptofuf 3 years ago
I'm not sure what you mean by
"You lose a stop with teleconverters? I always thought that they cut the maximum aperture in half"
Those two statements contradict themselves. a 1.4 converter will cut your max. aperture from 2.8 to 4. You are losing a stop of light. If your max aperture on the lens is 4, you would go to 5.6.
Hope that helps!
jknightglfr 3 years ago
the cut depends on the converter:
with the 1.4x converter your max. aperture will be multiplied by 1.4 (2,8 becomes 4 etc.), a 2x teleconverter would make a 2,8 a 5,6 max aperture.
morulaborator 3 years ago
Did he not have a head on the monopod??
dryan2 3 years ago
No. You screw it right into the monopod/tripod lens mount on the camera. You can add one, but most people don't.
jknightglfr 3 years ago
Harry,
Is it true you are now shooting Nikon D3/D300 after problems with your 1dm3 focusing???
How do you like the Nikon compared to Canon?
samwebster123 3 years ago
Probably. He did say "latest quote 'greatest' Canon" bodies. Safe to assume he had AF problems before shooting this video because he doesn't seem to thrilled to have these so called "latest and 'greatest' Canon cameras."
jknightglfr 3 years ago
Thanks for the info.Very helpful.
moomman89 3 years ago
what kind of monopod was that?
watcherofmovies93 3 years ago
velbon
dryan2 3 years ago 5
can u tell me which version of velbon it is please ? :)
blank10123 3 years ago
i hear he throws away his lenses after each shoot to get fresh ones
randyp1234567 3 years ago
i really doubt he would throw away $1000's of dollars lenses away after one shoot..
either he'd sell them or give them to someone else.
Antho188188 3 years ago
lol
bmten10 3 years ago
do u get to keep the camera equipment for good?
telf10 3 years ago