Mexicana 767-200 Hard Landing & others at Gatwick. View 1080P.

[LANCEGUBALLA]

Cebu pacific landing

[jjulius1985]

i closed it when the ad came up.

[klaprat]

There war no hard landing at all!

[TheHardstyleMasta]

SHEEPS!!! 2:13!



[klaprat]

@TheHardstyleMasta Poor sheeps-.-

[mrf12016]

I kew the pilot that flwe the Mexicana 767 :D, too bad they took his job, the same to many other pilots and crew.

[Drpepperman1885]

how many of those Virgin air 747's come in a day? I know of one that leave las vegas NV and i've been told it lands at Gatwick.

[Poppinit905]

Better then my landings in the Cessna :P

[carpfisherman25]

I enjoy watching airplans video more than porno

[sbentjies]

The second guy at least flared, the first guy just set his rate of descent and went for it

[MrCapi55]

It´s a sad thing that you don´t show even a single full stop landing. What is ovbious is that this is a short runway because in all landings, all pilots make imediate use of spoilers because they have to assure maximum brake/stop force.

[blueb0g]

@MrCapi55 This isn't a short runway at all. It's 3.3KM, longer than most. And you obviously don't understand how auto spoilers work; on all landings of large commercial airliners the spoilers deploy automatically as soon as the mains hit the ground.

[YMBatal]

@blueb0g Not to mention the telephoto lens effect on distance :D

[supermanzz2]

@blueb0g 3.3km? Thats really long

[seantification]

@blueb0g Wrong!

[LearPilot1020]

@MrCapi55 Another internet aviator on the lose! Watch out, guys. He obviously knows everything! Haha, classic. 

[carpfisherman25]

@MrCapi55 were the hell have u see an airplan landing without useing the spoilers

[craigwright1000]

@MrCapi55 immediate use of the spoilers is always used. Spoilers are set to the "armed" position and once positive weight is on the wheels they deploy, regardless to the length of runway used. Saves money on brakes ;-)

[deimos2k6]

diane vu venihe giu forte

[AlevliTurkGs]

wow they have very slow airplanes.

[Gian092]

Too much zoom, mediocre.

[johnairlines8]

Yesterday I saw a Boeing 747 Air Cargo jet come down HARD at Rickenbacker Airbase in Columbus Ohio

[CaptainMetalwing]

Musta been overloaded with drugs ;)

[qantas8888]

What camera do you use?

[Billyscccu]

What's Mexicana doing there?

[blueb0g]

@Billyscccu Flying planes

[jasaenz2]

@blueb0g BEAUTIFUL REPLY!

[sghost77]

@Billyscccu we used to fly to london from mexico.. mexicana is on ground since aug 26 2010

[AVIACIONEXPRES]

@Billyscccu Mexicana volaba a londres 1 vuelo a la semana a partir del 2009 y aeromexico 3 a la semana diarios

[100computerkid]

@Billyscccu maxicana is internatinal + lots of rich mexicans go around the world

[astoniz]

Panasonic HDC-HS60 ?

[j4cko56]

Guys! A320, 767, 757, 747, 777, not hard lol

[GolfPlayer96]

Not that hard like the Jumbolino landing in city from swiss

[rb21122b]

Where was the hard landing at? I must have missed it.

[MrSunwing]

@rb21122b gatwick

[marlo1204]

it's an airbus look at the wingtips

[blueb0g]

@marlo1204 The first aircraft is an Airbus, an A320, but the second one and the feature of the title is a Mexicana 767, as explained several times below...

[MrSunwing]

@marlo1204 the main gear is hanging forwared and only the 767 does that

[marlo1204]

@MrSunwing i didn't realize there was more than one airplane lol my bad :p

[MrSunwing]

@marlo1204 at the start i thought the same!

[MrPaki1996]

@marlo1204 its a friggin boeing 767 airbus has winglets im pretty sure you said this for attention because anyperson that would be watching this is an aviation lover and knows there planes very good

[marlo1204]

@MrPaki1996 theres more than one plane... one of them is 767 this was answered already LOL :P

[marlo1204]

@MrPaki1996 btw mr paki get your terrorist shits outta this aviation thing cus you gonna cause another 911

[MrPaki1996]

@marlo1204 shut up im from mexico mrpaki means something different so f u and get you aviation facts straigt

[blueb0g]

@marlo1204 Get the fuck off my video you disgusting creature. The guy even has a goddam 9/11 tribute video on his channel. There was abseloutely no need for that comment, not even sure where you're coming from - "he calls himself Paki so therefore terrorist." Go away and grow up.

[shaquallep]

@1.26 perfect landing

[gonetoworkbbackin5mi]

What's this little doodad right here? Whoops! AAAAAAIIIIIIEEEE! Earnest T Worrel, Senior Captain, US Air. (RIP)

[bokmanrocks]

does DHL still fly 767-200s?

[Frankrike99]

the first landing was soo hard just look at the wheels in slow motion.

[chfar072281]

Not a single one of the those landing's is considered a "hard landing".

[tomibewi]

That virgin 747 had a really soft landing!

[blueb0g]

@FeedCrayfish Just take a look at the aircraft. It's clearly a 767. And Mexicana DID have both 767s and A330s before they went bankrupt.

[blueb0g]

@aeromasterslefjohn No it's not. I note you've already removed your comment, so I think you agree with me.

[aeromasterslefjohn]

@blueb0g hahah yes i just realized it :)

[jonny96]

@FeedCrayfish

1. It has no winglets, so its a 767

2. It has forward drooping undercarriage, its a 767

3. The A330 has one of the most recognisable wings in service today! That ain't it!

4. Its a boeing, so it's a 767!

[zseartcc25]

@FeedCrayfish

u an idiot

[tomibewi]

@FeedCrayfish thats a 767

[fintanl43]

@FeedCrayfish its definetly a 767. take a closer look man

[qwechore]

@FeedCrayfish :O mexicana has B-767 :O a330 and a320

[j4cko56]

@FeedCrayfish Wrong.

[DFWdeno]

@FeedCrayfish really? Ive never seen an A330 without WINGLETS -_-

[Vincentcool16]

Damn I like the camera at the beginning! Wich one do u use?

[flyjet727]

Those are not hard landings

[jjaus]

Great stuff! Well done. The 762 landing was a dog, near as I can tell he didn't even flare. The VS744 was a beauty of a landing.

@nolifemerc the airline is Virgin Atlantic. Qantas is spelled thus and no, the spoilers were on time.

[blueb0g]

@jjaus Thanks mate! And yeah LOL, was thinking the same thing @nolifremerc, plus 747, not 474..

[legomovies64]

@blueb0g I think what he meant by 744 is 747-400.

It's just abbreviated :)

[blueb0g]

@legomovies64 Yes, thanks for that - if he'd said 744 that would have been correct but he didn't, he said 474.

[nolifemerc]

the boeing 474 from quantas the spoilers came on kinda early rigth?

[smartdon007]

U get paid for videotaping this shit ? Seriously ?

[blueb0g]

@smartdon007 Yup. What's your problem with that? Just because you're not interested in it doesn't make it shit. And your tune has changed since the last time you commented on my channel, which is interesting.

[smartdon007]

@blueb0g I don't have any problems w/ tht. I just didn't know tht You tube also pays ppl for taking videos and posting on their website. This is the 1st time i have heard it !

Did i comment on ur channel b4 ? I don't remember...

[MothWingthane]

Are you inside the airport boundary there?

[blueb0g]

@MothWingthane Nope, quite a way outside in fact.

[MothWingthane]

@blueb0g Oh neat. I haven't spotted at Gatwick for years and I had no idea you could get such a good view from outside.

[aeromexicofsx]

That is a 767-300

[blueb0g]

@aeromexicofsx Nope it's a -200.

[The214987]

The landing right after 0:35 is supposed to be the hard landing.

[justforever96]

So, "Gatwick" = airport? And what's "spotting"...is that a fancy way of saying "standing around watching planes land", or is there an actual job description?

[blueb0g]

@justforever96 Well, "GatwickSpotting" is just the name of another user I filmed this with. But yes, Gatwick refers to LGW (where this was filmed), and "spotting" is basically a word for watching aircraft yes, although it actually refers more to people with books of aircraft registrations crossing off ones they've seen or "spotted" but it's kinda spilled over to mean anybody watching/filming/photographing­ planes. So yes, you can make money off it (I get paid by Youtube for my channel.)

[1singleSh0t]

Jordi is quite chubby isnt he? xD

[laskieful]

Mexicana R.I.P :(

[sjtom57]

All were perfectly normal landings. Thumbs down for the misleading title.

[Luis7771000]

Who says mexicans can't fly? Please look up "aterrizando en la sierra" just like it, and see all the videos related to it... and we where just practicing....Viva Mexico.....777First officer for AMX.....

[citrus737]

I did not see any hard landings in the footage.

[hairybearz]

where does the kid at the start get the money from to buy a professional camera?!?!?!

[DDbRowN67]

Virgin airlines what a sense of humor!

[MrKerssing]

dat was niet echt een harde landing!

[dellave11]

the B767 of mexicana is mading a normal landing a too little hard but is a normal landing

[haga689]

i think it was almost to stall

[stevekach]

i thought it was a bit hard...he put it down quick...

[ekommamik]

well all are normal actually... well anything above 180 fpm rod is a hard landing....even 200... its g limited 1.0-1.3ish is acceptable.. :)

[gbriff]

this looks like a 767-300 or 400er looks too big to be a 200 series

[GatwickSpotting]

@gbriff Sorry, Mexicana only ever sent 767-200s to LGW.

[ducker1942]

all normal landings!!!this is a normal op . you dont know what is a hard touch

[Ameshdicto]

I agree @23087, Anything above 145Kts is a hard landing indeed. 767's have a MIN of 140 but may extend to 150 if required!

[iLearningToFly]

Let's talk about the landings folks :)

I think they were all alright to be honest :)

[7815987]

Hardies... Relax tigers....

[thelopespilot]

normal landings to me, except first one

[p5050]

No hard landings here..

[venividiviciboss]

the landing of virgins 747 was damn good :O

[23087]

My girlfriend and I are in school to be A&P mechanics and we didn't see any hard landings there all fairly normal landings actually

[blueb0g]

@23087 Well, you're correct that a mechanic might not recognise that as hard. But the definition of hard changes depending on who you're talking too. For a mechanic, like yourself, I guess a hard landing is one that damages the aircraft? But for spotters and pilots, anything over about -150FPM is a hard landing. As such, I would call that first landing as hard.

[iatakden]

@blueb0g Im a spotter to and im sorry i didnt see any hard landings . Ive also worked as a mech @ KDEN and nothing not one of those flight were " hard landings"

[myadder2]

@blueb0g I just read the other day that a 'hard landing' is defined as being 2.6g or more. Don't know if that's a universal thing, or just here in the UK, but I thought I'd tell you! :)

[wenzelsonthetube]

@blueb0g Baaaa haaa haaaa! Gee, I'm sure glad we can rest easy that spotters know what's what. What will you advise us next? Acceptable wing flex limits? Get off your perch mate. You'd be surprised how many A&P Mech's and Aircraft Engineers are also pilots.

Oh... and landing #2 was possibly the only questionable one there.

[blueb0g]

@wenzelsonthetube OK, first of all, the 2nd was the only one I ever called hard. Also, please read again my post, it seems you've misunderstood it. As I said, not everyone would recognise that as hard. However I am also a PPL and soon to be CPL/ATPL and I would call it a hard landing.

[wenzelsonthetube]

@blueb0g Okay, I'm sorry. For the record, I interpreted your comment to '23087' as "There there, dumb little engineer, run along and play with the other kids while us Pilots and very important Spotters talk about facts you don't understand". This is a common theme between Pilots and Engineers, hence my over-sensitive reaction. Reading over it a fews times it still sounds like that, but I concede that my interpretation was wrong.

[joepatroni77]

@23087

Yeah, that was a HARD landing

[23087]

I am a A&P mechanic and i didn't see a any hard landings

[hawk45653]

Mexicans cant fly planes

[mrbassyokel]

@hawk45653 americans suck at every thing fuckin white fuck face.

[eltfell]

@mrbassyokel Two times "fuck" in one short sentence - you must be really educated.

[mrbassyokel]

@eltfell fuk up u ugly nazi german fuck face.

just because ur accent sounds gay

[eltfell]

@mrbassyokel You should at least write Your lower class words in the right way. It's "fuck", not "fuk". And by the way, it's "you" not "u" and "your" not "ur".

[mrbassyokel]

@eltfell germans dont under stand txt language coz theyre fukin german. and ur a ugly skin head fuckface.

So heres some txt language for you: FCK U, if u reply, ur just an ugly fuckface

[eltfell]

@mrbassyokel Get a life and some education, nigger.

[mrbassyokel]

@eltfell u replied. OMG, who needs education now. dumb german fuck face.i wondor why ur accent sounds gay

[blueb0g]

@mrbassyokel Text speak isn't the way to write online. You're abseloutely pathetic.

[Beech165]

Damn thought you using a Rifle 00:00

[turbonetic777]

Fantastic vid......please keep them coming. :)

[da20cent]

At 0:04 you can see a departured plane in the background :)

[Flightkid9]

what type of camera where you using? quality is great! keep it up!

[blueb0g]

@Flightkid9 HDC-HS60, thanks!

[simon1430]

2:11 SHEEPS !!!! :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD­DDDDDDDDDD

[DeadlyInertia]

Such a smooth runway! So Flat, our runway is bent....

[darcougar]

nice camera

[Cathaydude]

i saw a bunch of sheeps behind the runway

[nimrob]

i believe that spotters wait for windy days to records many hard landings...

[LDP555]

Jersey girl flys into manchester regular aswell

[flyboy8492]

that virgin atlantic 747-400 landing was BUTTER.. NICE

[welchyjd1]

Awesome as alway,s :)

[tbird209]

Spectacular!!!!!!!! I really like the Mexicana livery from this angle.

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

the last plane looks like an a330 lol but its a 767?

i love a330s xD

[blueb0g]

BA 777.

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@blueb0g oh yeah, i thought it had 2 rows of wheels at the back not 3, thats how i tell them apart haha

but yeah i see its a 777 now, thanks :P

[Cathaydude]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon i love a350-900 or a350-1000

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@Cathaydude they havnt even made a prototype of the a350 yet hahaha

it will be good when they make it though, it wont be for a fair few years though xD

[blueb0g]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon They've made A350 fuselages. Or one fuselage, and cabin mock ups. First flight 2012 I think.

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@blueb0g i think it will be later than that, they dont seem to focus on that at the minute, i would rather them build the a380-900 and 1000 before the a350 comes into production

but the first flight will be early 2013 maybe 2014

i doubt it will be sooner lol

[blueb0g]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon Well first flight scheduled for 2012, entry into service (for the -900) for 2013. And they really are focusing on it! If I was them, I'd put all my attention into the A350 - the A380 is a lost cause, it's hard hardly any orders and has lost Airbus massive piles of money. The A350, however, can make a real profit and break into the position the 777 has held for over 15 years now.

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@blueb0g well yeah i want them to build it but i would rather them build the a380 1000 because it will be the longest plane in the world :)

getting back the title from the 747-8 -_-

but yeah i dont think it will be flying before 2013, that includes the testing lol

[Aviationnation10]

@blueb0g its delayed already

[Cathaydude]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon i know just saying Lol

[Cathaydude]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon well at least they planned it Lol, i love to see a 787 in a airport or i would like to be in the 787 and experience how it feels in it. its gonna be good!

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

i'd be more excited to go on an a330/a340/a380 than a 747/767/777/787 xD

[Tigerwarhawk]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon I would be more scared to fly on ANY Airbus--wondering if the vertical stabilizer is going to sheer off....None of the other commercial airline manufacturers has a history of that! Not Boeing, Douglas (McDonnell), Lockheed, Bombardier, Embraer, Convair, or even Tupolev!!

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@Tigerwarhawk ive never heard of a vertical stabilizer sheering off, and i was ACI a lot

its not a common thing, clearly

but i would rather fly on airbus than any other, still

[blueb0g]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon I think he's refering to the AA A300 crash after takeoff from JFK in 2001. Vertical stabilizer came right off, due to excessive pilot input on the rudders (but the rudder did travel too far to be considered safe.) Since then there have been a few similar close calls with A320 family aircraft.

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@blueb0g oh, the plane didnt totally mess up though did it? well, not all of them at least, possibly, i hope theres a video of it on youtube, even though i dont like that youtube has people dying on it... lol

ill do some looking into it too

[blueb0g]

@BringEllisTheHoriZon There is. And it is a design flaw, and something Airbus should have fixed (and there was even an AD about it this summer from the FAA.) It doesn't cause a problem in "normal" operations, but if you're in, for instance, wake turbulence, it can be a real terror.

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@blueb0g yeah i looked into it some more, same thing happened with a a330 hahaha

and the tail that came off an AA a320, it just can clean off, as if they loosened the bolts and lifted it off lol

i would still be happy in any airbus, apart from a a300 and a310

none are worse than a DC-10 so it will be fine xD

[BringEllisTheHoriZon]

@Tigerwarhawk ive never heard of a vertical stabilizer sheering off, and i was ACI a lot

its not a common thing, clearly

but i would rather fly on airbus than any other, still

[energycondensed]

nice quality. what kind of camera did you use??

[AlohaMaggieSteele]

Cool, I LOVE mexicana!

[dickyco2]

Pity you didn't focus your camera a little longer on the 6-8 mile high Contrails and Contrail-Cirrus , the Climate Changing Cloud of Combustion made from the vast toxic exhaust gasses and aerosols spewed out of the engines of these Sky Rupturing Smogliners .

With a jumbo burning about 1 Tonne of Tax free Kerosene every 4 minutes forming

Contrail-Cirus a climate changing cloud of combustion, that by its physical presence will change Atmosphere weather climate and so life on this Planet.

[blueb0g]

Actually, it makes much less change than you might think. After 9/11, a report suggested that the temperature in the atmosphere changed by a few degrees, showing that contrails had an impact on the temp etc - this was later disproved. Contrails have very little impact. Anyway, who cares? Aviation produces only 2% of the world's man made Co2 emmisions - anyone focusing on Aviation with regard to climate change is missing the biggest picture. Take your trolling elswhere please.

[dickyco2]

Who Cares? well i do, go to NASA read the damming reports on this Environmental Disaster see the pictures from space of Britain / Europe covered with a highly reflective frozen Acid Rain exhaust cloud ( Contrail-Cirrus ) made by half empty Smogliners 6-8 miles up and how this Smogblanket of pollution affects the Ozone layer or the effect vast amounts Nitrous Oxides are having. You obviously prefer to believe Big Oil sponsored disinformation than the reality of you eyes and common sense.

[blueb0g]

I like the way you answered none of my points, like a troll.

[tinkandtory]

@blueb0g Give him hell brother

[flyerholland]

@dickyco2 so much bullshit right there. haha ur fucking retarded.

[dickyco2]

@flyerholland One half empty Jumbo Smogliner burning about 1 Tonne of Tax Free Kerosene every 4 minutes , Exhausting Climate Changing Clouds of Combustion Contrail-Cirrus 6-8 miles above this Planet on the edge of space will change atmosphere . Thousands burning up there will change everything including your lemming like Big Oil powered sad existence.

[flyerholland]

@dickyco2 well if thats that.. then i dont give a shit. because i want to travel and not go on a fucking boat and take 4 months to go somewhere. there is enough of these chemtrail bullshit that makes existence already a sad thing.. thankyou for that. id be rather happy to see this bullshit from the earth forever.

[dickyco2]

@flyerholland Its Contrails. Exhaust generated Contrails that spread to form Contrail-Cirrus a Climate Changing Cloud of Combustion. FairyChem Tales are just that FairyChem Tales.

fly "The Burning Sky" fly Air-Pollution non-stop to the End of the Earth. Because your worth it.

[flyerholland]

@dickyco2 u r are talking all mister know it all.. but there is no evidence.. i saw u earlier shouting out about tax free kerosines.. wich is bullshit.. u just assume thats the way and thats with whole of your thinking. because u have no hard proof of any of the shit you have said. for realz.. now ur just gonna get up with a new argument or say read this or that. i want PROOF.(wich ofcourse isnt there)

[dickyco2]

@flyerholland Oh dear, All jet aviation kerosene, Avgas is Globally Tax Free.

"Contrails form high in the atmosphere when the mixture of water vapor in the aircraft exhaust and the air condenses and freezes. Persisting contrails can spread into extensive cirrus clouds that tend to warm the Earth, because they reflect less sunlight than the amount of heat they trap. The balance between Earth's incoming sunlight and outgoing heat drives climate change". Patrick Minnis NASA Langley Va 27.4.04