Added: 3 years ago
From: KeithTruth
Views: 1,025
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nadir should not be debating.. I've watched his other debate with Dr. White.. all he does is keep posing ONE question and then refuses to pay attention to the replies given.. he never seems to build a solid argument.. and only relies on arguments that he couldn't apply to his own text. Well done Keith.. the muslims at least deserve a better debater than Nadir.. that was embarrassing.

  • test

  • Wow Great Job Keith!

    Nadir was making me laugh so hard!!

    God Bless you and yours Keith!

  • If there is a nuclear war someone needs to make a shelter out of Nadir's skull as it is sooooo thick it would block any gamma ray.

    From the debates i've seen with Nadir he always tries to make a fool out of his opponent nit realising he's wasting time talking dribble.

  • Nadir's coffin was sealed after the opening arguement. It was further sealed at 2Pe:3:15: And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

    Nadir instead suggested that neither Peter or Paul held apostleship. Poor guy sounded like a layperson.

    Good job Keith. You handed this guy his AZZ.

    Petra

  • I'm just pointing out how ridiculous this debate is, Keith is providing intelligent straight-to-the-point examples and reasons for everything but Nadir is simply ignoring them, no matter what Keith says Nadir won't listen, Nadir may sound convincing - but ONLY if you shut your speakers off when it's Keith's turn to talk.

    Or in other words:

    Negative - Nadir

    Positive - Keith

    This is without having biased opinions either, I'm not for or against Paul being an apostle.

  • Nadir Ahmed is the worst debater I have ever heard. He doesn't have any evidence at all that supports his claim that Paul was a liar. All he has is his own opinion which he cannot back up. What a pathetic debater!

  • Bullshit is deep.We follow Yeshua.not muhammid your god,not paul get a life and convert yourself on truth.Kudos keith

  • This has got to be one of the most annoying debates I have ever seen...

    Keith: Paul was an apostle, we have evidence, we have A, B, C.

    Nadir: you can't give me a single good reason to believe in A, all you have is faith.

    Keith: we have evidence, we have A, B, C.

    Nadir: you don't have any evidence, all you have is faith.

    Keith: we have evidence, we have A, B, C.

    ...

    This debate ended at part 3.

  • what's the problem with muslims keep saying "the prophet paul",, or "paul was not a prophet"? do you mean a prophet like Moses and Elijah? i will not even put Mohammad in the same category with Moses...of course Paul was not a prophet like Moses and Elijah...he was an APOSTLE ...an APOSTLE...stop saying prophet like you understand...but in the same time he was a prophet as we understand because he was talking the words from God, filled with the holy spirit..just as my pastor is a prophet too...

  • Nadir:"I gotta go" (he was actually thinking, oh my i am getting pwnd)

    He ran again...... Feels like deja vu lollllll

  • Nadir parrots his arguments as if he's reciting a verse from the Qur'an. He pulls his own absurd theory out of his poopshooter, based upon his personal ideas and denies all historical data that confirms our "Pauline" New Testament creed. Case closed.

    Good job on smoking that redundant parrot. You sent him flying back into his cage.

  • Nadir you are a loser, hahaha idiot the next time you debate, you need to pray more to leg...

  • how can paul be even classed as truthful and honest person he gives three statements of how he converted on the road to damascus sadly all three were different this would never stand up in any court of law

  • OZMY, that muslim lie is refuted here

    tektonics (dot) org / lp / paulthree (dot) html

  • so what you are saying is the bible is lying?the three statements are all in the bible

  • read the article before making assertions and straw men

  • OZMY, that muslim lie is refuted here

    tektonics ( dot ) org / lp / paulthree ( dot ) html

  • Keith, you really did a great job, Nadir did not............Truth wins out!

  • Kieth clearly put facts out while Nadir ran around like a chicken with its head cut off. The main point isn't about winning or losing though. Its about exposing the lies that these people project to cover the truth. Its quite disgusting the lengths these people go to to refute Jesus and the word of God.

  • I think this whole debate was useless. It wasted 1 hour and 20 minutes of precious time and yet no end. I watch all eight videos and came up with conclusion that both parties couldn't answer each other's questions. And both parties were talking on blind faith. In the end Nadir left because he had a class, this doesn't make Keith the winner. I think Keith should summarize this video and asnwer Nadir's questions one by one in another video. ANd post it here, May God bless you all. keep it up

  • well sabeershah, you are muslim that is why you won't admit that I answered Nadir and refuted him. You are just angry because your fellow muslim lost the debate. I understand.

  • Dear Keith, I'm not angry at all. I don't think my message is showing a little bit of anger even. Instead of this debate, instead of pointing fingers at each other, instead of cursing each other, instead of accusing each other of false religion I think we should work as a team to promote peace and work on common grounds.

    This will develope more understanding among us and of course it's good for the community.

    What do u think?

  • I welcome that and I am thankfull you would too however doesn't the quran say not to befriend Christians or Jews and that we are pigs and monkeys?

    I love all people that seems mean doesn't it?

  • Again there are verses in Qu'ran which say something like what you quoted above. But there are some other verses which tells us clearly that we can marry jews and christians(people of gospels).

    Now if I want to be an ass and reject every other religion of course i'll follow the first one(which actually doesn't mean 'friends' it means 'allies in war').

    But for the betterment of society i'll definitely chose the later one. in your whole debate i saw that you were not provoking at all, it's gud

  • @KeithTruth come on keith you know it doesnt say that

  • @KeithTruth Doesn't the Kooran actually say that they should lie to infiltrate and than convert or decapitate.

    A religion that stones their own sinners to death flies in the face of anything God shared with us.

  • Well done Keith keep up the good work, one thing i learnt when debating with people like this liar is you got to check their claims and especially their quotes from the bible, these kinds of people are so stupid they actually think you will not check the scriptures to see if what they are quoting is true.

  • Keith, nice piece of work man, you really did your homework. I have listened to this guy Nadir before and he cannot do a straight debate. Ask him one question and he quickly changes the subject or make jest when he can't answer

    Your video proves these muslims just make things up. They accept their rock god allah but reject the real God our ROCK. They worship a false prophet who told them to drink camel's urine but reject the true prophet of the New Testament who ofered them the water of life!!

  • .."All scripture is given...by the inspiration of God." There are no controdictions between the works of Paul..and the rest of scripture. I find it odd that someone would challenge that.

  • Paul is always attacked because he was a convert.He is an example for us.He was the one who"did not see"but believed.He was the one that focused on the unity betwen the Son and Father aspect.He is an example of one who is lead by the spirit of God up to and including his death. Paul is one of our best evidences for the 1st century church and for the attitudes towards them by Greeks,Romans and Hebrews.From bounty hunter to faithfull preacher,Pauls intentions are clear.Why would he lie?

  • got it, thank you Keith God bless you too

  • Is true that Paul was a apostle but I feel a little weird accepting him as someone to speak "the word of God". I accept Jesus easily but is hard to me with Paul because he never met Jesus, yes he saw him in a vision and was accepted by the apostles but is weird that he have that much space in the new testament if he didn´t knew him when he was alive. We got to believe in him and the apostles that his vision was true, that´s a little weird to me.

  • I´m learning a lot here,lucius trust and the new age lies what you´re doing here is great

    Peace & Love

  • Well read the historical account of acts where Paul goes all over the place with the desciples. He was well aquainted with everything they knew. He was martyred for his faith after trying to preach Jesus Christ's salvation to the world. No reason to deny Christ selected him for his mission.

    John also had a vision and wrote revelation. Jesus appeared to Peter, James and the rest. So Jesus did indeed appear to skeptics. He wasn't shy and he wanted his message all over the world.

    God bless.

  • Paul did meet Jesus, albeit the glorified Jesus.

    It doesn't matter about which person's books occupies which proportion of the bible. Rather it is God who inspires the writer. If He inspires a writer to write one book or twenty, we accept them because they are from God.

  • yeah but every religion claim that their books are inspired by God and because of that the believer must accept them. Is at least weird the story of Paul and his importance, and the fact that Jesus never said anything about him when he was alive.

    I believe more in Jesus as a valid word of God than the apostles, and Paul came after Jesus, and his word in the bible occupies so much space.Who decided to make the compilation and discard other books?not God I think

  • God inspired the books or the compilation?

    By the way I agree that Paul was a valid apostle but I think his importance in space to be someone that didn´t knew Jesus is weird

    with all my respect I say it, because I love God

  • He spent 3 years with the Lord in Arabia before he went and met with Peter and James in Jerusalem. So he did meet our Lord.

  • With Lord you mean Jesus right??I didn´t knew that! ah great I feel a lot better about Paul now.

    thanks!

  • With Jesus is right :)

    God bless

  • Comment removed

  • Matthew 5:10-12 Jesus declares, "Blessed are they which are persecuted for

    righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye,

    when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of

    evil against you falsely, for My sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad:

    for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets

    which were before you."

  • nadir ahmed is well-described as an intellectual coward, and a social bully. he has no awareness of truth, his surroundings, or of how transparent are his fake little shenanigans. he's lucky that keith was willing to debate him, 'cuz he's forfeited the right be to taken seriously, as keith has helped him demonstrate, by dr. james white, sam shamoun. nadir is scared to death of Chistian_prince. mohammedanism's credo ~ "death to the curious"

    great going keith,

  • we have only 1 father, the rest are just brothers

  • HAHA awesome, I enjoyed listening to this debate. Total ownage there Keith, well done.

    God bless

  • LOOOL! I'm willing to bet that Nadir will never really agree to a debate on the prophetship of Muhammad.

  • It's prophet hood.

    And I don't mind debating if he didn't !

  • All I saw is this 8 segment debate was Nadir's denial of historical evidence that which confirms the biblical claims and the teachings of Paul,some wacky Islamic claims that have absolutely no historical evidence or relevance,such as the falesy that Paul fabricated true Christianity,which Keith completely dismantles and destroys with historical evidence.

    Nadir says over and over that, "Christianity has no evidence." Well, he obviously has never read a history book of any kind.

    God Bless Keith!

  • ahahahahahaha. by nadirs formula nothing can be proved. t

  • Keith needs a much more talanted debater to challenge him. Who ever this guy is just got his butt handed to him.

    Praise Jesus! He is the truth!

  • Great job Keith!  God Bless!

  • You smoked him Keith, well done!

  • he blew his cover and gown pwned at the first 15 minutes of the opening against Keith. Keith you did amazing. Nadirs true colors are exposed.

  • 1 Corinthians 2

    Chapter 3:4-5

    For when one says, "I am of Paul" and another, "I am of Apollos," are you not carnal?

    Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers through whom you believed, as the Lord gave to each one?

    Perhaps i missed the point? If i did, forgive.

    An attack on Paul, to me, is nothing but proof of what they are trying to defeat.

  • nadir is a lying snake and a coward, i'm glad you got this recorded

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more