Saying that to disarm the future we will have to avoid a booming synthetic biology industry is to say that, to disarm the future, we will have to shut down every single type of industry in our world.
Killing people is not a hard thing to do and any field of technologycan breed deadly weapons.
On the other hand, technology does not destroy employment, but change the parameterrs in the labor market, causing a crisis in the beginning, but increasing employment overall in the long term.
But today we have the internet, which allows science and society to advance and apply those new technologies at a much faster, exponential rate than in the past.
His analogy overlooks this and assumes science and social awareness of technology and it's practical uses and applications develops in the same way it did in the 19th and 20th centuries. He couldn't be more mistaken.
What a dire video. Interesting comparison between synthetic biology, and synthetic chemistry. Compare the evil of synthetic chemical weapons to synthetic biological weapons and think of the seriousness with which this topic deserves.
But hey, it will result in cheaper commodities! Thats fun!
yes I have..and wouldn't it be better to follow the opinion of millions which is based on the experience of people who lived around the time of the WW2,instead of believing who where born after these crimes and have a - call it questionable unserious history?it's up to you what you believe.but i'm interested what you think happened there? and why they needed so much of the hydrogen cyanide? i've been to some of the camps and I think there's no doubt that the "stories of murder" are in fact true.
A shameful display of luddism. Arguing that the synthetic chemical industry was economically harmful is absolutely absurd. Sure, individual people lost their jobs, but employment as a whole did not fall. Also, the synthetic chemical industry has been responsible for huge gains in the standard of living for people the world over.
i quit watching this after 2 and a half minutes. For some reason I just couldn't stand this guy.
richardlionnelcruz 11 months ago
Saying that to disarm the future we will have to avoid a booming synthetic biology industry is to say that, to disarm the future, we will have to shut down every single type of industry in our world.
Killing people is not a hard thing to do and any field of technologycan breed deadly weapons.
On the other hand, technology does not destroy employment, but change the parameterrs in the labor market, causing a crisis in the beginning, but increasing employment overall in the long term.
JulioMarco 1 year ago
But today we have the internet, which allows science and society to advance and apply those new technologies at a much faster, exponential rate than in the past.
His analogy overlooks this and assumes science and social awareness of technology and it's practical uses and applications develops in the same way it did in the 19th and 20th centuries. He couldn't be more mistaken.
.
AquariaNetTV 1 year ago
Did i hear correctly!!!-that at 5:25 he said that the 1918 flew virus was built-what!! is he sure-now i am confused!!!
jax668 1 year ago
What a dire video. Interesting comparison between synthetic biology, and synthetic chemistry. Compare the evil of synthetic chemical weapons to synthetic biological weapons and think of the seriousness with which this topic deserves.
But hey, it will result in cheaper commodities! Thats fun!
RealityZealot 1 year ago
Zyklon B was a delousing agent used to save lives, it was not used to kill people (see Germar Rudolf and Fred Leuchter).
sushicotto 2 years ago
ever been to a extermination camp... i think you better should before posting such comments
4prilia 2 years ago
Ever read Germar Rudolf and Fred Leuchter? I think you should before visiting the camps, or commenting about them.
sushicotto 1 year ago
yes I have..and wouldn't it be better to follow the opinion of millions which is based on the experience of people who lived around the time of the WW2,instead of believing who where born after these crimes and have a - call it questionable unserious history?it's up to you what you believe.but i'm interested what you think happened there? and why they needed so much of the hydrogen cyanide? i've been to some of the camps and I think there's no doubt that the "stories of murder" are in fact true.
4prilia 1 year ago
If you truly had read Germar Rudolf or Fred Leuchter (or Ernst Zundel), you'd know there was a typhus epidemic. Its a well known fact.
sushicotto 1 year ago
A shameful display of luddism. Arguing that the synthetic chemical industry was economically harmful is absolutely absurd. Sure, individual people lost their jobs, but employment as a whole did not fall. Also, the synthetic chemical industry has been responsible for huge gains in the standard of living for people the world over.
DescentToCocytus 2 years ago 3
Agreed.
WHGSTD 2 years ago
this has given me much to think about. top video
tetranoob 2 years ago
bravo !
guru0011 3 years ago
That is... what is the nature and science of spirituality.
russianvillageboy 3 years ago
Yeah, the only way to connect science and nature, is through spirituality. And the world is finally beginning to solve the so called mystery.
russianvillageboy 3 years ago
so true.
apuoks 3 years ago