@datachip Yes he should have said upwind; being downwind means the fallout would be falling in your direction, not something you'd want to have happen
In the early 90's the UK civil defence organisations the WMO, and Royal Observer Corps were disbanded. We have no way of dealing with this type of threat and are completely unprepared for it. As a former ROC Observer, I find that very worrying given we already have plenty of evidence that there are those here who would do us harm, 7/7 being the perfect example.
so scary that a small fraction of people from each country have so much animosity and hate that a nuculear war is possible all would suffer yet the majority of people from each side would be friends if they met.I wish the small fraction from each country would go waaay off grid and settle their hate on eachother only.media portrays the us as a country of people that hates and is almighty thinking but its not the actual truth ,only a small bit are that way.a world with no seperatenes istheanswer
So what kind of system are our ICBM's on? Obviously it is super secret, but is it computerized, or is it still two engineers turning a key? How likely is it that "human error" could start a nuclear war?
I've heard stories about the Russian government accidentally dropping unprimed nuclear bombs when flying over civilian neighborhoods, bombs being hidden down in mineshaft's and forgotten, nuclear material mysteriously disappearing. Is the U.S. in such danger?
@fluff125 ICBMs are nowadays highly computerized, but it still takes the two keys to launch.
The humorous thing is that some tests have shown that most people working at these silos are unwilling to turn the key when it comes down to it.
Also some ex-KGB agents have said in public that the USSR developed a centralized system that under certain conditions could launch all the Russian ICBMs at once, with only one soldier pressing one button.
@Cyberspine !!! Holy shit! Russia better get it's act together! Jesus. I wonder if a "Dr. Strangelove scenario could play out over in the fractured government of Moscow.
The reason this system was put together didn't have so much to do with countering the American threat as countering one at home. Because in the late USSR years the Kremlin was becoming more and more unstable, many important figures saw it as something that could calm down a possibly militant leader in the case of a crisis, because he would know that no matter what happened, there would be retaliation.
@fluff125 It could be very likely, but it would require two idiotic human beings. Instead of just one idiotic human being. ICMB's are computerized, but requre two seperate people to launch them. But knowing the government, they probally have a system where one person can launch it
@chesterngiamzhenghao i got 25 kill streak what do i need to do now i see a nuke emblem at the right bottom of my vision but i can't use it damnit its annoying rotating nuke thingy
Nice... Oh just one thing...to understand nuclear threats one must be politically savvy and well informed of the NWO agenda. The elites that truly run most of the planet have sworn to reduce the earths population by 80-90% by the next solar maximum in 2012. There are plenty of videos about the NWO on this very site. Try Endgame or The Obama Deception.
What if it's that 1.4 percent of people who can get a good bomb shelter in their yard, go there for a few days, and return to repopulate the world after the smoke clears? Could they inherit a new, depopulated world?
@tubecraft7 You would be living off of stuff you never would've otherwise. No vegetable, no harvest, no water, no nothing. You would be living off of canned goods, that we're still sealed in their cans prior to a nuclear holocaust. And you would haft to murder humans, and animals in order to have a good nutrition. And even then that is dangerous, as they can be carrying radiation in the blood cells from inhaling, which you then result in you getting infected, it would also mess with your DNA.
@WrestleFan1993 So I guess it's no use then in the long run. Best place to be in the event of an attack is either a military style bunker with more than just a couple of weeks of canned goods or right at the site of the blast you'll die in a split second, no worry about anything else.
IF the US will take out its own pawns on 911-I DONT trust the us gov...I think we should start a petition to ban ALL nuclear weapons!! If a country cant overcome with brute force alone-they have no buisness taking over...
Eliminating the threat of nuclear attack would be a bad thing. The threat of nuclear war is what keeps the world, relatively, peaceful. Since the development of the nuclear bomb, there have been no truly "big wars". If the atomic bomb had not been developed, a third world war and maybe even forth world war would have been waged by now.
@CharlieFoxtrot987 Didn't you listen to the talk? Are you thick? O are you repeating a sentence that you've heard before and sounds nice but you have no idea what it means? If you have an enemy "without an address", you can't retaliate.
@CharlieFoxtrot987 there is some truth in what you are saying but it still doesnt change the mindset of terrorists. I think thats a probable theory but ur not taking into account religion, some people can willingly die withouht regret. Also i dont think it will never be possible to truly be nuclear weapon free because countries like north korea and Iran are wild cards.
@bunkmasterflex Well-its unclassified that there are several hundred D.U.M.B. deep underground military bases that are intended for "government contingency" These could contain Millions and Millions of people!-Theres alot more patriots than there are dignetaries...So in my opinion-kokelasick may not have literary knowledge- but does show common sense-which cannot be obtained from a text book-to me this is more valuable than the easily obtainable spelling books...
@Jeenyus1983 you see the problem with your point lies in the fact that i was not criticizing his logic and have no opinion about these deep underground military bases. I just know that When someone cant clearly portray their point in any tangible way it makes it much harder to believe, you cant deny that. thats why you put the acronym as well as what it stands for the possible volume of the previously mentioned bases so you obviously know what i'm talking about
no how about the government propaganda like this and all the underground bases for them we should rebel now and take them over so the rich and powerful illuminati wont have no ware to go when their sick plan gos thru
Terrorists could never get hold of nuclear weapons and the trouble to smuggle it into an area high enough and for it to be worth while it would need to be detonated on a very high building for a more destructive shockwave. The ability to produce a nuclear weapons is impossible with out state fund-age and its very difficult.
if nuclear bomb was to used on usa it would have have been done long ago , he is scaring population to decieve them again who knows what there next agenda is rember 9/11 was inside job
this sucker is scaring us population by using words and numbers that ordinary person dont understand , concious person and sane person should be asking him why would some one want to attack usa
why wouldnt they? none of us have any idea that even goverments may bomb thier own cities. to be fair 9/11 was pretty ''convinient'' to say the least for the bush administration.
hmmm... Your probably the single most ignorantly stupid person i've come across in some time... I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are under the age of seven or so... I hope i'm not using to many superfulous words for you... I hope you grow up soon... Wait actually I take that back...
Every soldier had an NBC suit (duh) and a special kit. there were some 20 vaccines in the kit. first you had to inject the main sollution. depending on what color of skin rash you got (Lo0L) the booklet identifies whats contaminating your blood (a few main types of Bio and chemical agents) and you must injest the right colored vaccine. probably was some lethal antibiotics.
but at the end of the training the instructor said just lie down and wait to die in a nuclear war..
@WrestleFan1993 Looks like that mainstream media is successful in its mind control campaign...-thats exactly how "they" want "us" to feel--Then all they need to do is say-Yep them hagi's got weapons of "nuclear" distruction over there and they're gonna nuke us!-why would iran bite the hand that feeds em?
@treeoftears I'm not saying the West is any more or less trustworthy, but it's a much safer bet that we won't get attacked by oil hungry fat cats, compared to holy WAR wagers, that have said on numerous occasions they wish to nuke the United States, and it's allies.
nuclear war is not survivable for people but.... he never said anything about bacteria. so all the world has to do again is go through its cycle.... I dont care if we all die... i only care about the things the worlds needs to start the cycle up again...
humanity is just mentally retarded and childish im not saying this as "war is horrible" like those retards war is needed sometimes but peace would just help humanity take another step to evolving and moving into new levels of intellegence not trying to kill each other. The F1 Philosophy
In official it was Tzar but Big Ivan was a nickname given by creators. It was originaly 10MT of TNT but soviets scaled it down to about 50MT. Measured power of explosion was 57 MT.
haha the fucking zipperheads dont have the balls to drop a bomb on us! lil Kim Jong would have 10 ICBMs up his ching chong ting tong ass before hed see his dissapear in the distance...you have noooo idea how we react to threats like that...we had patriot missiles on the coast of hawaii and california before they were testing, and my friends dad is in command of 15 ICBMs all of them pointed at kimmys capital :)
dude youre a fucking faggot...why would you put a video on your profile like that...youre a fucking nerd who needs a life besides his videogames and his moms basement
I put the video on because it was shot with my friends, who found it hilarious. I put it on there for their benefit, as many of those who were there enjoy it. Additionally, I haven't gotten a new videogame in about a year. I volunteer, I do several extracurricular activities at school, and extensively talk with my friends in person.
Vaults? Nuclear war? It may be laughable now in the post-Cold War era, but it's still as real as a threat as ever, and will always be unless we dismantle ALL nuclear weapons and prevent their construction for any military purpose.
That was so much of good information! i was searching for such a presentation for the last few months and weird I stumble upon it when I am not even expecting it! lol
But I dont think that the wireless radios or mobile phones are going to work after a blast like that!? wont the radio waves be distorted?
No, the emp from a nuke lasts a fraction of a second and shorts out all electronic equipment. Research emp shielding to learn how to keep ur radio/phone working. You would only get emergency broadcasts on the radio and the phone prolly won't work for calls cuz i doubt ur cellphone provider has taken the time to shield all they equipment as its expensive to shield something that stays plugged into the wall.
if u get rid of em all what u gonna hit the asteroid with??? throw the turtle at it maybe thatll edge it off course with my plan it helps every1 but the camel fuckers it doesnt get any better then that o the other 1% of atomic stuff left unregistered suitcase bombs and other nuclear material in the hands of terrorists they believe what they do is righteous but why would they kill innocent children its not their fault their parents fuked up
detonated way above ground zero would still cause a deadly fallout storm
we don't die from burning and concussion anymore, we die purely from radiation sickness and cell damage complications (i.e. cancer)
nuclear power is actually too strong to even be used safely on earth or anywhere near, and that's just referring to fission warheads. fusion would be much much more deadlier. a nuclear war would mean permanent implications for everyone.
dude im talkin about getting all secure and unsecure warheads and putting them on an island for storage in case of an asteroid the only place they could possibly be exploded is where the un chooses ur only problem with my plan would be 2 things 1 if a bomb exploded and caused em all to blow up 2 if terrorists attacked which has 2 easy solves 1 make it high security and 2 put the storage silos deep underground either the % of a tarrorists attack would be highly unlikely
also i dont see where ur getting the idea that wouldnt solve it from because using them only for asteroid destruction would mean the only place they could blow would be in orbit i know we dont die from the blast as much as fallout what u dont see is what im talking about hellooooooo all warheads and nuclear material 1 island heavily guarded buried silos no materials or warheads anywhere on earth except that island if an asteroid comes it gets blowed up in space if it hits earth nukes dont matter
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There is only 18 ppl in history who died from radiation and to this day the link to radiation and cancer has yet to be discovered. Studies show that ppl who live in areas that have higher levels of background radiation have much LESS cases of cancer. In these cases (including people and animals in Chernobyl) radiations "destruction" of DNA actually activates chromosomes that have shown to prevent cancer when before it was dormant. The Rad to Cancer chart is 50 years old and unsubstantiated.4REAL
No worries, i have played fallout. Mantits and radroach meat for all!
sk8er4ever0101 1 week ago
we must build vaults !!!!! O_o
lanchedgehog 2 months ago
Very informative
6464jeremy 3 months ago
And ANOTHER REASON TO ABOLISH FEMA!
austenbosten 4 months ago
At 23:15, doesn't he mean "upwind" instead of "downwind" from the original blast?
datachip 5 months ago
@datachip Yes he should have said upwind; being downwind means the fallout would be falling in your direction, not something you'd want to have happen
ITILII 4 months ago
why r people talkin bout mw2? be serious u all should just die
MistaBobbyH 6 months ago
paranoia
MrNightLifeLover 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 6 months ago
my school got a kinda big bomb shelter under the ground in each building in thewhole city that was built before 1992 or someting
Skid00everest340 7 months ago
osama died
mrminecraftking1 7 months ago
Progressive Liberal.
mkmason2002 7 months ago
I'll move into a bunker, there's one 2 miles from my house, I'll buy it and I'll hide, and it would be really really bugler proof as well x)
SweedSleds95 7 months ago
u play morden warefare?yeah yeah? u will know how
kopifighter 10 months ago
DUMSFIELD THAT BASTARD TRATIOR!!!
cantore35 10 months ago
In Soviet Russia, you kill Nuke! I'm a pro in getting thumbs up!
chesterngiamzhenghao 10 months ago
@chesterngiamzhenghao fail
informationwarfare 8 months ago
17:38 i see that on the other side of the bridge and i would shit myself
TheSuzula 10 months ago
In the early 90's the UK civil defence organisations the WMO, and Royal Observer Corps were disbanded. We have no way of dealing with this type of threat and are completely unprepared for it. As a former ROC Observer, I find that very worrying given we already have plenty of evidence that there are those here who would do us harm, 7/7 being the perfect example.
planejunky 1 year ago
haha yea 5 thumbs up!
chesterngiamzhenghao 1 year ago
If a bomb went off, I want to ride it down off the bomber
vjrap 1 year ago
ENEMY NUKE INCOMING its over :'(
zxmenyo 1 year ago
At 17:38 the explosion would be horrific beyond imagination. Its too bad that schools doesn't teach to students to duck and cover anymore.
ryanlak1234 1 year ago
At 17:38 the explosion would be horrific beyond imagination. Its too bad that schools doesn't teach to students to duck and cover anymore.
ryanlak1234 1 year ago
that was very informative.
ceresmaniac 1 year ago
so scary that a small fraction of people from each country have so much animosity and hate that a nuculear war is possible all would suffer yet the majority of people from each side would be friends if they met.I wish the small fraction from each country would go waaay off grid and settle their hate on eachother only.media portrays the us as a country of people that hates and is almighty thinking but its not the actual truth ,only a small bit are that way.a world with no seperatenes istheanswer
missflutters 1 year ago
So what kind of system are our ICBM's on? Obviously it is super secret, but is it computerized, or is it still two engineers turning a key? How likely is it that "human error" could start a nuclear war?
I've heard stories about the Russian government accidentally dropping unprimed nuclear bombs when flying over civilian neighborhoods, bombs being hidden down in mineshaft's and forgotten, nuclear material mysteriously disappearing. Is the U.S. in such danger?
You know how the government is.
fluff125 1 year ago
@fluff125 ICBMs are nowadays highly computerized, but it still takes the two keys to launch.
The humorous thing is that some tests have shown that most people working at these silos are unwilling to turn the key when it comes down to it.
Also some ex-KGB agents have said in public that the USSR developed a centralized system that under certain conditions could launch all the Russian ICBMs at once, with only one soldier pressing one button.
Cyberspine 1 year ago
@Cyberspine !!! Holy shit! Russia better get it's act together! Jesus. I wonder if a "Dr. Strangelove scenario could play out over in the fractured government of Moscow.
Was Putin KGB?
fluff125 1 year ago
@fluff125 Yes, Putin was in KGB.
The reason this system was put together didn't have so much to do with countering the American threat as countering one at home. Because in the late USSR years the Kremlin was becoming more and more unstable, many important figures saw it as something that could calm down a possibly militant leader in the case of a crisis, because he would know that no matter what happened, there would be retaliation.
It could would have been like in Dr. Strangelove.
Cyberspine 1 year ago
@fluff125 It could be very likely, but it would require two idiotic human beings. Instead of just one idiotic human being. ICMB's are computerized, but requre two seperate people to launch them. But knowing the government, they probally have a system where one person can launch it
thedeadwalkk 1 year ago
potassium iodine is essential as it stops cancer caused through fallout
3rk4u 1 year ago
I WILL BEAT YOUR ASS WITH A SHOVEL! IF YOU FUCK WITH MY COUNTRY!
ThePivotAlex 1 year ago
would wearing a gasmask help your chances of survival ?
megbulb 1 year ago
u r born in vault 101 u will die in vault 101 and 35 five people who disliked r terrorists
megbulb 1 year ago
u r born in vault 101 u will die in vault 101
megbulb 1 year ago
...that monkey must have really hated Bert The Turtle.
jacobdallen2 1 year ago
Lol I hope this happens, I like Fallout 3.
soboringman 1 year ago
Fear the future...
drpwninator 1 year ago
Morons in charge of our safety, nutjobs stealing nuclear material and religious zealots with their finger on the little red button.
... Investing in a shelter would be a waste of money, I'm gonna go buy that PS3 while I still can...
Unicron4ever 1 year ago 29
@Unicron4ever yea and buy fallout new vagas
DRCATZZ 1 year ago
@Unicron4ever
Have you played Fallout: New Vegas?
andyrooney12 9 months ago
lemme ask this,
what the FUCK does soccer have to do with dick and ball clouds?
Kryzech66 1 year ago
It's easy, TO SURVIVE A NUCLEAR ATTACK, PREVENT ANYONE FROM GETTING A +25 KILLSTREAK
chesterngiamzhenghao 1 year ago 18
@chesterngiamzhenghao haha, i found your comment funny :D
RoflCockSlap 1 year ago
@RoflCockSlap thanks man
chesterngiamzhenghao 1 year ago
@chesterngiamzhenghao i got 25 kill streak what do i need to do now i see a nuke emblem at the right bottom of my vision but i can't use it damnit its annoying rotating nuke thingy
LastTangoDown 10 months ago
@LastTangoDown why not? you can use it...btw I dont play multiplayer I play Black Ops and its multiplayer only, and MW2 campaign too...
chesterngiamzhenghao 10 months ago
@chesterngiamzhenghao what if they are using hardline?
ppwalk05 10 months ago
@ppwalk05 lol I dont play mw2 I just know about the stuff. I play black ops tho
chesterngiamzhenghao 10 months ago
@chesterngiamzhenghao NERD
XXNIKXX776 4 months ago
Nice... Oh just one thing...to understand nuclear threats one must be politically savvy and well informed of the NWO agenda. The elites that truly run most of the planet have sworn to reduce the earths population by 80-90% by the next solar maximum in 2012. There are plenty of videos about the NWO on this very site. Try Endgame or The Obama Deception.
joedevol1 1 year ago
@joedevol1
Tinfoil isn't radiation proof, take that hat off.
tattat44 1 year ago
very good vid
ninjamonkeys13 1 year ago
press like if u came here beacuse of any of the fallout games
AbRamskiller41 1 year ago
This is a joke. THERE IS NO SURVIVING A NUCLEAR WAR!
aubergine2c 1 year ago
@aubergine2c if u watched this video to the end it says at 24:13 that:
Nuclear War is not effectively survivable... AND Nuclear Terrorism is survivable.
DJariko 1 year ago
@aubergine2c This says attack, not war.
TheBoberton 1 year ago
@aubergine2c yes there is
248996 1 year ago
huh ?! i cant look on a nuclear explosion :( damn , its the most beutiful thing ever (not saying the best thing ever) ...
dude5857236 1 year ago
What if it's that 1.4 percent of people who can get a good bomb shelter in their yard, go there for a few days, and return to repopulate the world after the smoke clears? Could they inherit a new, depopulated world?
tubecraft7 1 year ago
@tubecraft7 You would be living off of stuff you never would've otherwise. No vegetable, no harvest, no water, no nothing. You would be living off of canned goods, that we're still sealed in their cans prior to a nuclear holocaust. And you would haft to murder humans, and animals in order to have a good nutrition. And even then that is dangerous, as they can be carrying radiation in the blood cells from inhaling, which you then result in you getting infected, it would also mess with your DNA.
WrestleFan1993 1 year ago
@WrestleFan1993 So I guess it's no use then in the long run. Best place to be in the event of an attack is either a military style bunker with more than just a couple of weeks of canned goods or right at the site of the blast you'll die in a split second, no worry about anything else.
tubecraft7 1 year ago
How to survive a nuclear attack: Be Chuck Norris
CookieMonzta1995 1 year ago
But who is the real monster? TURNS OUT IT'S MAN!
Ming64 1 year ago
I don't trust any country with nuclear weapons.
CanadaJoshua27 1 year ago 2
IF the US will take out its own pawns on 911-I DONT trust the us gov...I think we should start a petition to ban ALL nuclear weapons!! If a country cant overcome with brute force alone-they have no buisness taking over...
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
@Jeenyus1983 but let me ask you this. If North korea and Iran refuse to abide by non nuclear pacts, would you be willing to disarm all US nukes?
jeseiscool 1 year ago
@jeseiscool ABSOLUTELY! NUCLEAR technology is the enemy of all humanity-free or suppressed! The us-or any other country has no buisness with nukes!
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
@Jeenyus1983 Who took your tinfoil hat?
Delta4845 1 year ago
@Delta4845 What brings you to the assumption that I once had a tin foil hat?
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
Eliminating the threat of nuclear attack would be a bad thing. The threat of nuclear war is what keeps the world, relatively, peaceful. Since the development of the nuclear bomb, there have been no truly "big wars". If the atomic bomb had not been developed, a third world war and maybe even forth world war would have been waged by now.
CharlieFoxtrot987 1 year ago
@CharlieFoxtrot987 Didn't you listen to the talk? Are you thick? O are you repeating a sentence that you've heard before and sounds nice but you have no idea what it means? If you have an enemy "without an address", you can't retaliate.
OneLoop 1 year ago
@CharlieFoxtrot987 there is some truth in what you are saying but it still doesnt change the mindset of terrorists. I think thats a probable theory but ur not taking into account religion, some people can willingly die withouht regret. Also i dont think it will never be possible to truly be nuclear weapon free because countries like north korea and Iran are wild cards.
jeseiscool 1 year ago
i love how i'm supposed to listen to the guy underneath me who couldn't manage the word where
bunkmasterflex 1 year ago
@bunkmasterflex Well-its unclassified that there are several hundred D.U.M.B. deep underground military bases that are intended for "government contingency" These could contain Millions and Millions of people!-Theres alot more patriots than there are dignetaries...So in my opinion-kokelasick may not have literary knowledge- but does show common sense-which cannot be obtained from a text book-to me this is more valuable than the easily obtainable spelling books...
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
@Jeenyus1983 you see the problem with your point lies in the fact that i was not criticizing his logic and have no opinion about these deep underground military bases. I just know that When someone cant clearly portray their point in any tangible way it makes it much harder to believe, you cant deny that. thats why you put the acronym as well as what it stands for the possible volume of the previously mentioned bases so you obviously know what i'm talking about
bunkmasterflex 1 year ago
@bunkmasterflex Absolutely-It is very challenging to portray common sense without common knowledge...
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
no how about the government propaganda like this and all the underground bases for them we should rebel now and take them over so the rich and powerful illuminati wont have no ware to go when their sick plan gos thru
kokeklasick 1 year ago
good thing i got a gas mask
theunknown117 1 year ago
did the people at ted really need this explained to the?
swagger93 1 year ago
The Iranians are working round the clock to enrich uranium and this guy just says it's no problem.
I think this guy is the problem
bobmartin23 1 year ago
Terrorists could never get hold of nuclear weapons and the trouble to smuggle it into an area high enough and for it to be worth while it would need to be detonated on a very high building for a more destructive shockwave. The ability to produce a nuclear weapons is impossible with out state fund-age and its very difficult.
goddesslush 1 year ago
intro Music scared the shit out of me... had my speakers up.
silverandteal 2 years ago
you need to get the hell out of america..................there probably gonna nuke themselves because they cant resist that red button
pulsegang 2 years ago
Yes because that makes sense doesn't it.
goddesslush 1 year ago
...Maybe the whole thing was a big hoax. Lots of money to be made if you can get people behind the idea that a nuke strike is likely.
vachief 2 years ago
Very informative, thanks for posting
ndnredman166189 2 years ago
if nuclear bomb was to used on usa it would have have been done long ago , he is scaring population to decieve them again who knows what there next agenda is rember 9/11 was inside job
SHOOTER0072003 2 years ago
seriously, do you read this shit off a script or something?
Angaraman 2 years ago
this sucker is scaring us population by using words and numbers that ordinary person dont understand , concious person and sane person should be asking him why would some one want to attack usa
SHOOTER0072003 2 years ago
why wouldnt they? none of us have any idea that even goverments may bomb thier own cities. to be fair 9/11 was pretty ''convinient'' to say the least for the bush administration.
maybe NORAD was sleeping that day??
lostronin666 2 years ago
hmmm... Your probably the single most ignorantly stupid person i've come across in some time... I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are under the age of seven or so... I hope i'm not using to many superfulous words for you... I hope you grow up soon... Wait actually I take that back...
Infidelnumber77 2 years ago
o sorry forgot about why would some 1 want to atack usa , i forgot about usa killing innocents around the world
SHOOTER0072003 2 years ago
@SHOOTER0072003
omg, what the hell are you saying? what part of that didn't you understand?
PCDTSME 2 years ago
He talks the truth.
goddesslush 1 year ago
I will beat your ass if you f**k with my country! lmao
Sammas2255 2 years ago
"I will beat your ass with this shovel if you fuck with my country"XD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GREATEST LINE EVER!!!!!!!!
WrestleFan1993 2 years ago
Luved that Civil Defence Poster
International0IDIOT 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
may all your nuclear weopans rust in piece
MrDroopdog1 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDroopdog1 2 years ago
red army, my dad 1981:
Every soldier had an NBC suit (duh) and a special kit. there were some 20 vaccines in the kit. first you had to inject the main sollution. depending on what color of skin rash you got (Lo0L) the booklet identifies whats contaminating your blood (a few main types of Bio and chemical agents) and you must injest the right colored vaccine. probably was some lethal antibiotics.
but at the end of the training the instructor said just lie down and wait to die in a nuclear war..
patrikasLTL 2 years ago
pakistan's nuclear facility has been attacked 3 times in the past year or so. they claim no nuclear warheads were taken. scary though
trckstr261 2 years ago
The fact that they have Nuc's is scary.
jonnyfivem1 2 years ago
i wouldnt trust any middle eastern country with nuclear weapons as far as i can throw them
WrestleFan1993 2 years ago 18
@WrestleFan1993 Looks like that mainstream media is successful in its mind control campaign...-thats exactly how "they" want "us" to feel--Then all they need to do is say-Yep them hagi's got weapons of "nuclear" distruction over there and they're gonna nuke us!-why would iran bite the hand that feeds em?
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
@WrestleFan1993 and they can trust the west?!
treeoftears 1 year ago
@treeoftears I'm not saying the West is any more or less trustworthy, but it's a much safer bet that we won't get attacked by oil hungry fat cats, compared to holy WAR wagers, that have said on numerous occasions they wish to nuke the United States, and it's allies.
WrestleFan1993 1 year ago
@WrestleFan1993 does that include Israel?
jay19xxx 1 year ago
@WrestleFan1993 agreed!!
eric777100763 1 year ago
never touches on the fact that if enough nukes went off that it would cause a civil war
GeneralBerger 2 years ago
what do you mean?
SteelRainAssault 2 years ago
war....war never changes
malissard1959 2 years ago 30
@malissard1959 fallout 3
kingoffallou 1 year ago
@malissard1959 Fallout FTW
Wafflepudding 1 year ago
@malissard1959
Yea got a reservation in a vault tech vualt :)
thecomicaleagle101 1 year ago
I accidentally clicked 4/5, but I meant 5/5. This Redlener dude is wild, great speech.
eziekial101 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bomb mecca....
drorbenami 2 years ago
Ill try to survive to get a pip boy
Madnessofoblivion 2 years ago
hahaha oh yeaaaa!!!
lastmanstanding425 2 years ago
Vault Tech anyone?
FishApprentice 2 years ago
I got denyed for a vault...
Madnessofoblivion 2 years ago
that was an epic speech. i think every u.s. city should have a public or home bomb shelter.
70Ny303 2 years ago
nuclear war is not survivable for people but.... he never said anything about bacteria. so all the world has to do again is go through its cycle.... I dont care if we all die... i only care about the things the worlds needs to start the cycle up again...
pinkiller96 2 years ago
Actually, it is VERY survivable. You picked the wrong video to put that comment on.
lostMachinima 2 years ago
very good way to look at things but hey, you only get one chance to live
SteelRainAssault 2 years ago
humanity is just mentally retarded and childish im not saying this as "war is horrible" like those retards war is needed sometimes but peace would just help humanity take another step to evolving and moving into new levels of intellegence not trying to kill each other. The F1 Philosophy
f123456789knvm 2 years ago
thats was only 10 kilo ton bomb in new york! the biggest tested by russia was a 500 kilo ton bomb!
68965 2 years ago
Actual the biggest russian bomb - Tzar was 50MT that Equals 50 000 kilotons.
lorusik1982 2 years ago 2
oh ok
68965 2 years ago
You guys are making me feel a lot safer Thanks....
spiraltikey 2 years ago
but using 50 1MT bombs instead of one 50MT would be much more effective
plmqas 2 years ago
it was "IVAN" 50 mega tons
vvenomraid 2 years ago
In official it was Tzar but Big Ivan was a nickname given by creators. It was originaly 10MT of TNT but soviets scaled it down to about 50MT. Measured power of explosion was 57 MT.
lorusik1982 2 years ago
originally it was a 100mt. u dont go from 10 mt and scale it down to 50 0.o
Razputin53 2 years ago
sorry - forgot to add one zero :P - of course i meant 100MT
lorusik1982 2 years ago
No, the Tsar Bomba was 50Mt = 50,000Kt. That's 3000 times the Hiroshima explosion.
Jinmane 2 years ago
haha yea i saw the video, try to run downwind from that shit eh? lol
SteelRainAssault 2 years ago
north lorea is warning the u.s. of total destruction
mattwins18 2 years ago
its not possible if they only have 12 bombs.....
pinkiller96 2 years ago
haha the fucking zipperheads dont have the balls to drop a bomb on us! lil Kim Jong would have 10 ICBMs up his ching chong ting tong ass before hed see his dissapear in the distance...you have noooo idea how we react to threats like that...we had patriot missiles on the coast of hawaii and california before they were testing, and my friends dad is in command of 15 ICBMs all of them pointed at kimmys capital :)
SteelRainAssault 2 years ago
15 ICBM?......10 warheads each.....150 warheads on 1 waste of space country,...i dont think so,....
wilatemodel 2 years ago
@SteelRainAssault
cool story bro.
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
shut the fuck up...
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
NO U
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
dude youre a fucking faggot...why would you put a video on your profile like that...youre a fucking nerd who needs a life besides his videogames and his moms basement
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
I put the video on because it was shot with my friends, who found it hilarious. I put it on there for their benefit, as many of those who were there enjoy it. Additionally, I haven't gotten a new videogame in about a year. I volunteer, I do several extracurricular activities at school, and extensively talk with my friends in person.
Additionally, I am quite straight.
Have a nice day.
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
have a nice day pounding your asshole with your buddies
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
If by pounding, you mean playing, and by asshole, you mean soccer, then yes, I will.
Thank you :D
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
soccer is for girls
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
Then why, may I ask, do almost all major nations of the world have a proffesional men's soccer team?
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
there are gays in all nations apparently
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
That doesn't answer my question.
Why would gays go out of their way to form a proffesional, government-regulated soccer team?
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
because you fuck your pillow at night
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
LOLWUT
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
lol im kidding, im just not a big soccer fan
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
Wait, a bit of reasonability?
Not pure, venomous hatred?
WHAAAAT?
Could it be that...
You were trolling me and decided it wasn't worth it?
Or maybe I'm just an easily fooled idiot, I dunno.
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
lil of both :)
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
@SteelRainAssault
Well then, mon frere, you've just fooled me.
Nice job.
Now then....*ahem*...
WHY CAN'T WE JUST GET ALONG?
TRRProductions09 1 year ago
because as long as there are nuclear weapons on this planet there will be crosshairs on every country
SteelRainAssault 1 year ago
Stop feeding the troll dude.
ervin2 1 year ago
i would just go into the sewers to survive a nuclear attack. its safer than ducking and covering.
thecydonianknight314 2 years ago
im with you
SteelRainAssault 2 years ago
Does anyone else think that the events before Fallout 3 could actually happen? Besides that every home should have a bomb shelter.
v535gamer 2 years ago
Vaults? Nuclear war? It may be laughable now in the post-Cold War era, but it's still as real as a threat as ever, and will always be unless we dismantle ALL nuclear weapons and prevent their construction for any military purpose.
Chaosblade777 2 years ago
The events before Fallout 3. F3 is set like 250 years in our alternate future.
mgold08 2 years ago
I thought that is wan the 1950-1960 CE period...
oh will have to play Fallout 2 again some time...
GegoXaren 2 years ago
99 red balloons gooo high!
YllwNinja 2 years ago
HOLY FUCK THAT LOOKS GOOD. I mean the 'splosion at 17:38.
mubd1234 2 years ago
yeah nuclear blast - good times!
Ntone606 2 years ago
That was so much of good information! i was searching for such a presentation for the last few months and weird I stumble upon it when I am not even expecting it! lol
But I dont think that the wireless radios or mobile phones are going to work after a blast like that!? wont the radio waves be distorted?
Dubaifreak 2 years ago
No, the emp from a nuke lasts a fraction of a second and shorts out all electronic equipment. Research emp shielding to learn how to keep ur radio/phone working. You would only get emergency broadcasts on the radio and the phone prolly won't work for calls cuz i doubt ur cellphone provider has taken the time to shield all they equipment as its expensive to shield something that stays plugged into the wall.
utterube 2 years ago
nation vs nation ... USSR was not a nation at least not in a definition.
Papinuti 2 years ago
Great information. Thanks for posting.
linkdead14 2 years ago
if u get rid of em all what u gonna hit the asteroid with??? throw the turtle at it maybe thatll edge it off course with my plan it helps every1 but the camel fuckers it doesnt get any better then that o the other 1% of atomic stuff left unregistered suitcase bombs and other nuclear material in the hands of terrorists they believe what they do is righteous but why would they kill innocent children its not their fault their parents fuked up
zeusofgods 2 years ago
detonated way above ground zero would still cause a deadly fallout storm
we don't die from burning and concussion anymore, we die purely from radiation sickness and cell damage complications (i.e. cancer)
nuclear power is actually too strong to even be used safely on earth or anywhere near, and that's just referring to fission warheads. fusion would be much much more deadlier. a nuclear war would mean permanent implications for everyone.
hypermegaman 2 years ago
dude im talkin about getting all secure and unsecure warheads and putting them on an island for storage in case of an asteroid the only place they could possibly be exploded is where the un chooses ur only problem with my plan would be 2 things 1 if a bomb exploded and caused em all to blow up 2 if terrorists attacked which has 2 easy solves 1 make it high security and 2 put the storage silos deep underground either the % of a tarrorists attack would be highly unlikely
zeusofgods 2 years ago
also i dont see where ur getting the idea that wouldnt solve it from because using them only for asteroid destruction would mean the only place they could blow would be in orbit i know we dont die from the blast as much as fallout what u dont see is what im talking about hellooooooo all warheads and nuclear material 1 island heavily guarded buried silos no materials or warheads anywhere on earth except that island if an asteroid comes it gets blowed up in space if it hits earth nukes dont matter
zeusofgods 2 years ago
of course u don't see anything..
u can't even see the usage of punctuation marks.
god, i'm not even going to try to understand what you're trying to type
hypermegaman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There is only 18 ppl in history who died from radiation and to this day the link to radiation and cancer has yet to be discovered. Studies show that ppl who live in areas that have higher levels of background radiation have much LESS cases of cancer. In these cases (including people and animals in Chernobyl) radiations "destruction" of DNA actually activates chromosomes that have shown to prevent cancer when before it was dormant. The Rad to Cancer chart is 50 years old and unsubstantiated.4REAL