@jyoo21 I actually enjoy this rendition of the prelude actually. Straightforward and simple. His touch is a bit strong sometimes but he makes it the prelude move like no others.
@diego8700 You'd probably describe it as largely imitative or contrapuntal - the word counterpoint is a bit of a beast and can mean many things, like "species counterpoint" or "strict counterpoint", of which this is neither... does that help??
Richter is the greatest classical pianist of the 20th century hands down please! No one had his combination of depth, technique, and not to mention he had a HUGE reportoire and was an excellent sight reader. This prelude is awesome btw.
@wowzies99 There is a slightly easier version of the prelude, which is strictly a two part invention - not included in the famous Two Part Inventions.
This is probably the correct speed but personally I prefer the Prelude slower (and you can go slightly more detached on the quavers too that way so the Prelude becomes bouncier and lighter), and the Fugue faster.
I think the prelude is at the right speed though the piano prevents some of the important notes to come out. Wow Richter is especially great with this piece.
However they recorded the fugue, they did an amazing job. The marcato subject and answers sound almost like a chorale. Jealous! The upright in my apartment just doesn't cut it
Yes this is a lovely piece of prelude and fugue. It was my Grade 8 ABRSM piece, and i love to play it every now and then. However, i do think that the prelude if abit too fast, and the fugus is too slow..
although i assume its a professional playing .. but i think the prelude is spoilt with the speed.. this piece was made to play slowly , thus the theme in the prelude wasnt expressed with clarity..as a student who studies music and its history, bachs pieces are supposed to be played slow , with the theme being expressed most importantly.
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
i fuckin hate playing this peice, i felt like i was putting so much effort into it all for something that in the end, i didn't like playing or hearing. FUCK!!!
Oh, and speaking of the fugue, is there a reason why Bach didn't end the piece at bar 33? It shifts into F-minor (very unconventional) before once again cycling through A-flat, B-flat, E-flat, and then back to A-flat again. Is there a reason for this, or is it just Bach being Bach?
Yes, this it definitely Bach being Bach. If you look at the A-flat major fugue in the second book, you'll see it does a similar thing --- and an earlier version of the same fugue (in F major) stops at the first point. So he definitely decided it needed another trip around the block before parking the car for good.
This is not unsual for Bach or his contemporaries.
It's called a deceptive cadence. Your ear expected to hear the dominant resolve to the tonic (A-flat) but got the relative minor (F-minor) instead.
This is a device composers use to add harmonic interest by postponing the expected cadence.
Here Bach uses a deceptive cadence as a bridge between the previous F-minorish sequential episode and a coda that reprises the subject in the tonic key.
Actually, in the WTK 1+2, this specific pattern only occurs twice. Once in one of the later pieces in book two, and this one here (as smalin already confirmed). There are an abundance of dominant-seventh cadences used to this effect, but the relative minor ones are rare. That's why it caught my ear.
where exactly is the deceptive cadence?? it's not at the end of the Prelude nor Fugue, I listened to it twice but can't find it. can you please pin point the time? thank you!
On the 2nd and 3rd beats of measure 33 of the fugue there's a V-VI deceptive cadence (Emajor to Fminor), just before a coda that reprises the subject in the treble.
such a great fugue. kind of like mozart's work, very bubbley and joyous. richter is clearly enjoying playing it, its very uplifitng. bach's well temepered clavier is rest assurred the finest
it's really interesting how we all think differently about the speed of the fugue. Some say he plays it too slow, and others say its too fast. I think this is a goood speed, although I play it just a little slower. I don't think it should be any faster if anything. The fugues tend to be much slower than the preludes to let the contrapuntal effect have more space. If it's tgoo fast, you lose the sense of the piece growing and you don't hear the voices as clearly. But, thats just my opinion.
omg I know exactly how u feel. I dont understnad how he does it! Although, I feel that he sometimes brings the theme out a little bit too much for my liking. It almost sounds forced if u know what i mean. He plays the prelude very well though!
the entrance of the subject was brilliantly projected. amazing indeed.a couple of the subjects in the alto and tenor sounded like they were being played by one hand, they were clearly connected and the legato touch was excellent.
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 month ago
Does anybody know of any beginners books on counterpoints/ further composing?
ingni123456 3 months ago
This is so great.
ivanoschen 4 months ago
wow I know for sure that this fugue will become of my upcoming favourites ^^
RemovdSande11 5 months ago
I LOVE this slow, legato, sonorous and romantic approach to the fugue!
mtv565 6 months ago
fugue: nicely played.
prelude: not so much.
jyoo21 7 months ago
@jyoo21 I actually enjoy this rendition of the prelude actually. Straightforward and simple. His touch is a bit strong sometimes but he makes it the prelude move like no others.
NimbleTurtle13 2 months ago
i've grown so used to gould's hammering style that i'd forgotten how gentle this music can be
MagicDolphinGO 10 months ago
Was this recorded from a live performance?
SC2larry 1 year ago
@xaber101 thanks a lot :)
diego8700 1 year ago
I prefer Glenn Gould playing this.
Isospinsymmetries 1 year ago
It was a very nice detail the scores you put in the video as the music plays. Thank you
yulkatx 1 year ago
he plays the fugue in a magnificient way ..
v9v2 1 year ago
Is the texture here "counterpoint" ??
diego8700 1 year ago
@diego8700 You'd probably describe it as largely imitative or contrapuntal - the word counterpoint is a bit of a beast and can mean many things, like "species counterpoint" or "strict counterpoint", of which this is neither... does that help??
xaber101 1 year ago
Richter is the greatest classical pianist of the 20th century hands down please! No one had his combination of depth, technique, and not to mention he had a HUGE reportoire and was an excellent sight reader. This prelude is awesome btw.
hoodloom22 1 year ago
Damn. The piano in these Richter/Bach recordings is not to A-440Hz. Why is that? Maybe the recording has altered the pitch?
fdsaman123 1 year ago
well thank you for your post...
but I feel it a bit too soft.. I am not a musician, sorry for saying this, BUT of course I like it
subtlebond 1 year ago
I wish the beat was like 5 bpm was slower. Then it would be perfect.
Enix5548 1 year ago
GOOD GRACIOUS the fugue!!!! Themes perfectly coming out like magic.
heinzgilbert 1 year ago 2
I'm so impressed about how clear the Theme is heared in some extra-difficult spots!
grThetrojan01gr 1 year ago 2
OMG I LOVE the first piece just wish I could play it on classical guitar : (
wowzies99 1 year ago
@wowzies99 There is a slightly easier version of the prelude, which is strictly a two part invention - not included in the famous Two Part Inventions.
letsgetslive 1 year ago
This is probably the correct speed but personally I prefer the Prelude slower (and you can go slightly more detached on the quavers too that way so the Prelude becomes bouncier and lighter), and the Fugue faster.
pianololita 2 years ago
I think the prelude is at the right speed though the piano prevents some of the important notes to come out. Wow Richter is especially great with this piece.
Enix5548 2 years ago 2
Sviatoslav, we miss you so much!!!!
iguarni 2 years ago 13
what do you feel when you play or listen this piece?? i ask this question because i must play it for a test....thanks!!!
117mathieu 2 years ago
Prelude: It's very lively piece and it's a good reference for me to prepare this piece for ATCL. But i think it can be a bit slower.
Fugue: very legato.
Overall: i love this piece of music
brianpht 2 years ago
fugue so hard!!!
very confuse on finger walk@@
kongkiakeng 2 years ago
However they recorded the fugue, they did an amazing job. The marcato subject and answers sound almost like a chorale. Jealous! The upright in my apartment just doesn't cut it
nathanplayspiano 2 years ago 3
@nathanplayspiano : Oh diddums !
3NUNS 1 year ago
wow!! i like this fugue!! it's so beautiful!! :)
nocturne217 2 years ago 4
Yes this is a lovely piece of prelude and fugue. It was my Grade 8 ABRSM piece, and i love to play it every now and then. However, i do think that the prelude if abit too fast, and the fugus is too slow..
dreamscapeGan 2 years ago
lol
this 1 is player's own tempo
you that tempo is ABRSM setting 1
kongkiakeng 2 years ago
this fugue is so difficult. the fingering makes me want to cry!
flicfan416 2 years ago
try singing the interioer voices
ocwhanappi 2 years ago 4
although i assume its a professional playing .. but i think the prelude is spoilt with the speed.. this piece was made to play slowly , thus the theme in the prelude wasnt expressed with clarity..as a student who studies music and its history, bachs pieces are supposed to be played slow , with the theme being expressed most importantly.
san2matrix 3 years ago
How do you know "this piece was made to play slowly"?
Is sounds fine to me at this tempo.
Where do you get the idea that "bachs pieces are supposed to be played slow"?
According to his sons, he liked to play fast. LOL
wcbroccoli 3 years ago 3
do you actually dare to question Richter's playing? he's the music expert, so leave it to him to decide how to interpret music.
NewDawnFades608 2 years ago
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
oh, sorry, i didn't mean to reply to you. i meant to address the poster before you.
NewDawnFades608 2 years ago
Actually, the only thing I said about Richter's playing in this channel was "it sounds fine to me at this tempo."
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
yeah, and richter for sure didn't study music at all, huh?
xxh3llfir3xx 3 years ago
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
pianojeans 3 years ago 3
i fuckin hate playing this peice, i felt like i was putting so much effort into it all for something that in the end, i didn't like playing or hearing. FUCK!!!
Risewithfallen21 3 years ago
Comment removed
nathanplayspiano 2 years ago
Fugue starts at 1:11.
hornuser 3 years ago
Oh, and speaking of the fugue, is there a reason why Bach didn't end the piece at bar 33? It shifts into F-minor (very unconventional) before once again cycling through A-flat, B-flat, E-flat, and then back to A-flat again. Is there a reason for this, or is it just Bach being Bach?
AsSomedayItMayHappen 3 years ago
My vote is Bach being Bach. Very cool deceptive cadence find!
hornuser 3 years ago
Yes, this it definitely Bach being Bach. If you look at the A-flat major fugue in the second book, you'll see it does a similar thing --- and an earlier version of the same fugue (in F major) stops at the first point. So he definitely decided it needed another trip around the block before parking the car for good.
smalin 3 years ago
This is not unsual for Bach or his contemporaries.
It's called a deceptive cadence. Your ear expected to hear the dominant resolve to the tonic (A-flat) but got the relative minor (F-minor) instead.
This is a device composers use to add harmonic interest by postponing the expected cadence.
Here Bach uses a deceptive cadence as a bridge between the previous F-minorish sequential episode and a coda that reprises the subject in the tonic key.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago 4
Actually, in the WTK 1+2, this specific pattern only occurs twice. Once in one of the later pieces in book two, and this one here (as smalin already confirmed). There are an abundance of dominant-seventh cadences used to this effect, but the relative minor ones are rare. That's why it caught my ear.
AsSomedayItMayHappen 2 years ago
I suspect there are many more V-VI cadences than the 2 you identified. They might be obscured by voice movement or passing tones.
Working from beginning of WTC 1&2 I already find several more examples:
WTC1: C# major fugue m53; C# minor prelude m38; C# minor fugue m10; D major fugue, m13; E-flat fugue m35; E major fugue m10, m23; F# major fugue m6
WTC2: C major fugue m68
Art of Fugue: 2-subject fugue #9, 2nd subject enters in treble on VI.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago 2
where exactly is the deceptive cadence?? it's not at the end of the Prelude nor Fugue, I listened to it twice but can't find it. can you please pin point the time? thank you!
brianmcbisk 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
On the 2nd and 3rd beats of measure 33 of the fugue there's a V-VI deceptive cadence (Emajor to Fminor), just before a coda that reprises the subject in the treble.
Measure 33 starts around starts around 3:38.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
in German : "Trugschluß". terminus technbicus
ocwhanappi 2 years ago
such a great fugue. kind of like mozart's work, very bubbley and joyous. richter is clearly enjoying playing it, its very uplifitng. bach's well temepered clavier is rest assurred the finest
shivdas99 3 years ago
its not a fugue :)
wolfinhovienna 3 years ago
The second part is...
AsSomedayItMayHappen 3 years ago
it's really interesting how we all think differently about the speed of the fugue. Some say he plays it too slow, and others say its too fast. I think this is a goood speed, although I play it just a little slower. I don't think it should be any faster if anything. The fugues tend to be much slower than the preludes to let the contrapuntal effect have more space. If it's tgoo fast, you lose the sense of the piece growing and you don't hear the voices as clearly. But, thats just my opinion.
kevalkeval1993 3 years ago
Is this play by Sviatoslav Teofilovich Richter? I am willing to by his CD now.
sumire666621 3 years ago
omg i can never bring out the theme at 1:54
dluu13 3 years ago 2
omg I know exactly how u feel. I dont understnad how he does it! Although, I feel that he sometimes brings the theme out a little bit too much for my liking. It almost sounds forced if u know what i mean. He plays the prelude very well though!
kevalkeval1993 3 years ago
I tried that with some success. You can have a look at my video on this piece.
alanchan1024 3 years ago
I can actually get it now, after a bit of concentrating on that part. I'm just too lazy :P
cluu1 3 years ago
woops posted with the wrong account, but nice video as well
dluu13 3 years ago
i meant the CD for the grade 8 music book...
hkrickywu 3 years ago
for some reason i like the offical cd version better... suppose this is another style...
hkrickywu 3 years ago
"official cd version?" Care to explain what you mean? ;)
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago 2
@Pianoplayer002 : Vetted by the KGB !
MusicPredominates 8 months ago
@hkrickywu yeah, as if Bach released an official cd...
cumulus0007 6 months ago
The subject of left hand in the prelude is not clear enough, i think.
But for Fugue, the subject is "terribly" clear. It is difficult to imagine how to play on this way.
nonamepoeple123 3 years ago
wow...this is pretty fast...but it's really good.
cinzhe 3 years ago 3
the entrance of the subject was brilliantly projected. amazing indeed.a couple of the subjects in the alto and tenor sounded like they were being played by one hand, they were clearly connected and the legato touch was excellent.
bridgetooi 3 years ago 4
Fugue is slow.. but SO CLEAR
terryregnar 3 years ago 7
I don't think it's too slow, it's moderato. Anywayz, it's truly amazing!
TheTool2 3 years ago
It's a bit too fast...although he can control it.
mcren1874 3 years ago
What a nice piece! Very lively and energetic.
FREEASTHESTARS 3 years ago 2
Doesn't sound like A-flat :o sounds like A major.
danmccolm135 3 years ago 5
Yeah it's slightly sharper for some reason
I personally like it better like this :)
johnalt16 3 years ago
thanks! i'm playing this piece - nice to hear another version
angelagracewaters 3 years ago
who played this?
dana1108 3 years ago
uuuum it says so in the title, but I can give you a hint; Sviatoslav Richter... Does that ring a bell? ;)
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago 3
Thank you once again. You should know how appreciative we are that you do this.
mal8739 3 years ago 14