Added: 4 years ago
From: bfq3000
Views: 108,877
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (357)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • now anyone who thinks they can counter what i just said should read their history books, read the bible, and go to church, because anything evolutionism refurring to macropopulation is false, however evolution with micropopulation is true such as viruses and bacteria

  • and any christian, or catholic, or protestant, or lutheran i'm pretty sure would agree with me about everything i said and that genesis states that we started farming before when jared diamond said, and that we also learned to domesticate animals before when he said, and insulting me just means you have nothing better to counter with

  • and if i said anything here proven to be false let lightning strike me dead, thats how positive i am that everything i just said is 100% true

  • i mean it's really just creationism vs evolutionism, and is most debates like that creationism almost always wins, because you eventually take an evolutionist back to the beginning of man and they just can't explain how life started, they either say we were made from goo or that aliens made us, if so where did the aliens come from, i mean sooner or later you just have to accept that their has to be a higher being at work

  • i mean in a debate these things could easily be countered with the right research, bible verses, historical events, political, religious ect.

  • i mean i have nothing against jared diamond, he's a great scientist, but i just have ti disagree with some of the things he says, although everyone has different beliefs

  • look at the political side, eurasia is along the lines of latitude capricorn and cancer, if they are in that line of latitude and they prospered, why didn't north america also prosper, and northern africa, and asia, acording to the political side, any area along the same line of latitude must have the same animals, plants, ect,

  • @jewelzlife89 "... why didn't north america also prosper, and northern africa, and asia, acording to the political side, any area along the same line of latitude must have the same animals, plants, ect,"

    READ THE BOOK. Diamond explains exactly this question.

  • why would y'all use youtube to watch documentaries for fun?

  • @caitichelle22 I was watching this for school! :P ^^

  • @caitichelle22 I like doco's

  • What a perfectly politically correct theory!

  • this is super gay really who cares about all this stuff

  • I partially agree on the note that collective competitiveness may have played a bigger role on en - massing the resources given by designated areas other than arguing about geopolitical upheavals and other socio - psychological spectrum . Of course back then pragmatical results are essential soon forward human creativity , ingenuity and curiosity in order to harness the potential of the resources . . . i give credit to the Europeans for being opportunistic enough to lead the torch  of humanity

  • ...The focus within this thesis conveniently veers from addressing this factor. They haven't even domesticated animals as a food source. Said domestication would have opened up time for them to advance travel technology and thus gain foreign materials. I feel Diamond's argument is too sympathetic in that he has developed intimate social relationships with these people, thus lost objectivity.

  • ...Moreover, the argument that pigs could not be harbored as labor animals does not withstand the fact that the New Guineans have long been too stupid to breed these animals in a controlled environment - or preserve their meat via salt - they're literally protein deficient with boar running wild - brilliant...

  • ...These idiots in New Guinea have yet to master production of a vessal to even leave their island at any significant distance - and what materials did this require in the 15th century? Wood, textile, and salt (food/meat preservation). All of which they had appropriate access to utilize/create...

  • Can we not overlook the obvious, here? For hundreds of years, more technologically advanced populations have NOT been completely dependant on their immediate ecological materials in order to survive...Europeans mastered crossing the ocean by the 15th century, thus retrieving a wealth of plants/seeds etc from other parts of the world. (e.g. corn, potatoes)...

  • I think the term Germs in this documentary is unnecessary 

  • this makes the most sense than anything else, it is basic common sense. The truth is often very simple, its human beings that make it complicated.

  • So far I do not agree with this "Guns, Germs and steel" 100%.  I mean how about most of Africa? They had the animals to work with, they also have or had the most resources in Earth! More then The Romans, Celts, Teutons, Egyptians, Chinese, Ethiopians, Aztecs, Greeks, or many others can dream of! But yet most of Africa lack behind of them by millenniums! I mean how do you explain a tribe of Celts or Germans that made the first of one of the Pattern welled steels in about 800BC?

  • @xxTeutonicKnightxx Egypt and ethiopia are both in africa and africa played a big role in the roman empire and somewhat also in the greek empire.

  • @xxTeutonicKnightxx The documentary did point out that sub-Saharan Africa only had one of the 14 large farmed animals. Eurasia had 13, I think that is a major advantage for the Eurasians.

  • @NinjaTom2005 I am not completely disagreeing with you there. It is just it is also the mentality & culture of the people that play a huge role. Have you done any study on different cultures? Europeans in the past were very competitive & had a culture of leaning from mistakes as well & fixing them. Many other cultures were not very competitive & would not even review mistakes if it was made do to being shameful.... As well Europeans assimilated or willing to learn from others...

  • when is the part when the European defeated an Empire with losing an swords?

  • I am watching this while eating junk food and using a modern computer.

  • The idea that people were only able to indulge their creativity and invent new tools to better their lives ONLY AFTER they had the surplus necessary to give them the time, fits in well with humanist psychologist Abraham Maslow's Heirarchy of Needs.

  • @tovia4singer I am not so sure. Imperialism emerged along with civilisation. That is why it is not a “European” phenomenon. By now the Chinese are trying to “catch up”. At this stage of history the task is to figure out how to stop the human savagery of the last millennia, for it has not disappeared in spite of nice cars, clothing, and wit.

  • yay

    

  • what do all successful countries have in common? 3 things?

    

  • Comment removed

  • @wwefanworld2 your name I assume is "World Wrestling Entertainment fan world 2?" lol why would anybody value your intellectually devoid opinions on anything? Go watch some more wrestling you retard, at least you wont have to waste another moment watching "Liberal Jew shit"

  • i would've felt so BA to ride a horse in the new world as a conquistadore

  • There is definitely more to why certain places in the world are impoverished while others are so prosperous. For example, how can Diamond explain why importing of so much free food from rich nations fail to free up the time it takes for the non-farmers to advance their civilization? Or maybe that is covered in the subsequent episodes?

  • "...and now, 20 million tons of wheat is consumed in America per year" ...and 80% of that is in the shape of hamburger bread?? ;o)

  • The domesticated crops of excess began to feed the inventors, thinkers, artists, etc. Um... where did they come from? I think there is a disconnect here in this video. I understand the concept of excess food allowing other tasks to be done.. but how do you explain certain civilizations coming up with some of the best ideas/etc/etc.. especially when all cultures learned things (in what seems to be like a bubble) like farming?

  • @Blueboy4440 It is all about time. When there is not enough food surplus, there is less time for people to sit around and think, tinker with things, and so on. Humans value life more than anything. If you are left with the option to work to survive, or die thinking, you will get your ass to work.

  • @Blueboy4440 Notice that the thinkers in the past were always from high society. This doesn't mean that only the rich were intelligent. If you have to work all the time to eat, you don't have leisure time to think.

  • @Figaera69 I understand that, and I don't doubt this.. What im wondering though is why did certain societies (those that were on a better starting point) flourish in different directions (compare Ancient Greeks and their thought process/ etc with lets say, Egypt and their thoughts/etc). I think there is a little bit more to race/culture then simply guns (a later invention), germs (practical in only the new world) and steel. Agriculture is the engine that started it.. past that its different.

  • @Blueboy4440 Imo, The main reason is simply culture. If people have a culture of compiling information/techniques etc they will advance while people that don't have that aspect in their culture won't advance. Sure people can have access to certain animals and plants but if they don't learn/acquire the knowledge to use them, those animals/plants would be useless.

  • @erkziltonz I agree. You put it better then I could have ;D

  • @Blueboy4440

    Couple of users have responded to you basically saying when you have to work to feed yourself, you don't have time to think about other stuff. And I agree with this, these are my thoughts also.

    But you also ask where did best ideas come from and the answer was given - it's all about resources. When you have wheat, you don't think about an axe, you think about having something to cut the wheat with, something to grind it with, and so on. There you have sickle>scythe, mill, etc.

  • @mickeypopa Some truth about that but Culture has a big role to play as well...

  • I love science...

  • THIS WAS SO COOL SO WATCH!

  • Whether the New guinea would have made colonies on the moon by now or be where the western world was 400 years ago isn't known and isn't the point.

    The point is that they were never really given the chance due to being forsaken by geographical disadvantages.

  • smug cock-sucking American... my people... Americans are crackers from Europe who were crackers from the North side of the Caucaus Moutains... a stone throw from the Fertile Crescent....

    America has only Rome/Greece/Holy Roman Empire/France, Britain, and Spain to thank... and the Dutch...just maybe but the Dutch are gay !

  • To lay it all on geography is indeed leaving out the role our ancestors played in all of this. IF it isn't all just geography, I wonder what mayor societies the new guinea people could've built based on the entirely different ecological system. But the problem, mostly, lies in obtaining enough resources to support the society from the start. So it's probably mostly, if not all, due to a lack of geographic blessings.

  • Wow, i had never really thought about this. But is true, geography has so much to do with the way societies end up. Big part of the wealth/success of the society is the result from the geographical space that society is located in.

  • Wow, i had never really thought about this. But is true, geography has so much to do with the way societies end up. Big part of the wealth/success of the society is the result from the geographical space that society is located in.

  • You work with what you got. You have nothing, then you're going to get nothing. You have something, then you're going to get something. And if you have a lot of something, then you're going to get a lot of something.

    JARED DIAMOND in few words. The other explanations are just racist. Plain and simple!!!

  • Sid Meier already figured this out years ago - and built a computer model for the theory that even a child could understand.

  • @DrCruel Did that model turn into a game perhaps? I'm curious.

  • @FHomeBrew The Civilization series, of course. I think they're up to Civilization V now. My familiarity is more with Civilization III and IV, where access to key resources and terrain types can easily mean the difference between early prosperity and expansion or cultural stagnation.

  • @DrCruel I now have my own hand print on my forehead :p But it's still a game, so I wonder how accurate a model it is.

  • @FHomeBrew Not particularly accurate at all, although it does make you think. And it is still a great game.

  • @DrCruel The one thing that keeps me from enjoying that game is that it's turn based and not real time. Other than that it's oké.

  • great video! =D

  • Diamond responds correctly to them accusing him of determinism. I've learned in the past days that hard core relativism/constructivism is a strategy to hide ignorance, and that this ignorance is a result of lazy armchair researchers. Thinkers like Diamond, who actually do field research and ample lecture are the ones we should pay attention.

  • @Alexopolux i certainly agree with you.

  • @nmenego You shouldn't! I also make armchair research!! :) Thanks.

  • @Alexopolux of course i agree with his theory.. i was taught this in the fourth grade back in 1970.. it just seems strange that it is being debated.. food production and domestication of beasts .. how is this new?

  • @kingslegion1 The thesis of Diamonds’ book is that the basic determinant for later European hegemony was cheer luck: favorable initial geographic and climatic conditions. I am not anthropologist, but my guess is that you cannot possibly have learnt this in the 70s for the fashionable thesis was cultural superiority – a pretty self-serving substitution for the race thesis.

  • @Alexopolux but i did learn this in 1970.. or a simpler version of it.. we were taught the reason we had so much and other countries so little was us being blessed to live in an area that had so much to offer naturally, therefore as children we were taught to give and try to help those other countries. This was basic social studies in 4th grade alabama. our climate was perfect for growing all we needed plus many things europeans did not have at the time (im muskogee indian) so this is not new.

  • Comment removed

  • @Alexopolux Have you heard Terence McKenna's talk that you can find here on YouTube titled "Plants, Consciousness, and Transformation"? It's a real interesting listen and I highly suggest it if you've got the time. It's actually a recording of a class he gave at Esalen Institute.

  • > > I've learned in the past days that hard core relativism/constructivism is a strategy to hide ignorance, and that this ignorance is a result of lazy armchair researchers.

    Learned that in the past [few] days have you? Wish I could learn that fast. Alas us idiots would have to take a college class or two over the subject before making a judgment like that.

  • Who are you calling retarded!?! The reasons things worked the way they did, because the people he's talking about used religion to brain wash, then guns to kill, germs because they were nasty, steel to build factories to kill the earth! You my fellow human being are retarded!

  • @Odori73 You can't blame people for instinctively killing things they are scared of or know nothing about. Jared Diamond says in the book, that we have done this since the dawn of us. Our leaders have been trying to find ways to make it easier to meet people and not do this. Thank god we live in a world today where social networking is something that is second nature. Also, we didn't build factories to kill the earth, but to efficiently harvest things from the earth, indirectly harming it, oops.

  • EPIC MUSIC AT 2:40! XD

  • Trolls write in caps. Don't feed them.

  • THATS A FUCKING LIE!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY WOULD NOT HAVE MADE HELICOPTERS BECAUSE THEY LACKED DESIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @infinity999ful Er, pretty sure you have no idea what other people may or may not desire...

  • @kothosj YES I KNOW WHAT PEOPLE DESIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS BY THEIR ACTIONS NOT THOUGHTS. FRUIT BY LABOR. STOP MAKING EXCUSES FOR THE RETARDED AFRICANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @infinity999ful lmao we need to calm down ok...... you sure read minds to know what ppl desire cuz desire is not always show by actions. most of the time the desire comes from yourself and then if you have the elements you fight/show it....

  • @MegaLollipopLove collective vs individual. collective wins

  • @infinity999ful sdfu 

  • @infinity999ful Unless you have asked everyone on the planet, you don't know whay people desire. You've no basis for thinking that - you're just making stuff up, and everything you're making up is wrong too...

  • If the geographical location wasn't ripe to create a prosperous life or future why not venture out? Then you could have more cargo. Thanks for the vid.

  • @InternetGlove If you aren't prosperous enough to thrive where you are, how are you going to be able to just up and leave?

  • Where in this programme does it explain why Europeans were such adventurers whiling to leave the boundaries of their continent and explore the oceans?

  • Personally, I think the divergence across the world is caused by a combination of Institutions (as defined by Douglass North and Geography. Both of these are the deep determinants of growth. They create other determinants, including nutrition (different diet structures), technology (the hallmark of modern growth), social structures (hierarchy of values, culture, religion). Different areas are endowed with different geographical constraints, but human choice in institutions are critical as well.

  • doesn't middle east remind you of the dirty thirties in Canada?

    ...people never learn

  • The Mexica Movement were wrong about Jared Diamond,because he never said the white man created guns,germs and steel but it was spread to Europe and North Africa to the west and India and China to the east from Mesopotamia.Also he never said the whites were superior because of intelligence but geographically differences.

  • It's ridiculous to argue over these issues. Some people will believe that blacks are inferior solely because they are black, so what's the point?

  • The development of writing systems also played a part.

    The Romans would not have been the Romans w/o the alphabet derived fm the Greeks. Greek phil would not exist w/o the writg system that came fm trading with Phoenicians.

    The Hebrew (or Phoenician script) was nec. to write the Bible which played an important role in Euro development (incl. the adoption of the alphabet)

  • @rarework Read the book. He has like 2 chapters only on language. This documentary is really shallow in compare with the book.

  • You have to have a certain level of intelligence to understand what Diamond is speaking about. It is complex thinking, something that the usual WHITE POWER crowd lacks.

  • @josecitomadera well said

  • It was lack of ingenuity. If they could get pigs why couldn't they get horses or wheat? Lack of foresight. Somebody in ancient England said "hey, lets bring those cows over here!", what a difference that made. Apparently, nobody did that in PNG.

  • @0HippyHunter0 interesting. You're forgetting that England is part of Europe and is much more easily accessible than PNG. Moreover, as Eurasia adopted farming and herding, and thus developed specialisation and power thanks to the surplus of food, they began colonizing other parts of the world. They wouldn't just nicely transfer their technology unless some kind of mutual trade can happen, or unless both sides of the societies have similar power.

  • @sunnyK89 Proximity didn't matter for pigs, why would it matter for horses or cows? Or easier yet, wheat? Just like his later example, the Inca's, PNG's were hesitant to change their way of life. We see examples of this all over the world today. I would point out to your second point that every other colonized country had full access to guns, horses, ect. The plains indians had horses and had never met a westerner. So, saying that western powers guarded their "tech" is wrong.

  • @0HippyHunter0 FYI, Horses are NOT native to North America. 

  • @pdxmack That's the point of my statement. You don't need to come face to face w/ a westerner to get their technology. In similar fashion, Europeans quickly adopted dozens of American foods; they saw potential. They also moved crops from Europe to America for similar reasons.

  • @0HippyHunter0

    Well the pigs could very well have come from a one off migration (i.e. shipwreck) in stead of being brought there on purpose. When the Anglo-Saxons migrated to America, they already had regular means of transportation to the new continent hence the comparison might not be valid.

  • So the Arabs made the middle east a desert? No. It was dependant on the climate and population size. They also downplayed the ability of people to travel. Ask yourself this question: if you have a food store would you stay in the the middle east? No. you'd move to other more pleasant places.

  • @0HippyHunter0 yes, due to their POPULATION!

  • @awesome220 Uh oh, somebody drank the Diamond Kool-Aid! Kid, this guy isn't the only historian in the land. He has one, self-conflicting, opinion. There is no evidence that the arabs overpopulated the ME and had to move out. I'm guessing you read Collapse, too. Which would explain the repeated Kool-Aid-ness of your posts.

  • Lol at Jared saying New Guinea people would have invented helicopters.

  • All this has already been known to historians for centuries... look up "Fertile Crescent" on Wikipedia

  • Why are you so bent on proving someone else is subhuman than say you? They are human in the end, we all have lives. What is your goal with this, and what do you want to accomplish? Do you honestly seriously think that they could do better if they found a place where they can sustain life and manage? Isn't that not enough. Now it's also an island, which made it more difficult for visitors outside. If they had met outsiders, that could perhaps encourage travel outside due to finding out that

  • For example the Austronesians were an Asiatic people who lived in an identical environment to other races such as the Papuans, living out an initially primitive existence. They developed very sophisticated navigation and colonised the Austrolasian Archipelago even crossing the Indian Ocean to Madagascar. A lower subhuman like HomoFlorenenesis wouldn't have the initiative to do this and would live out an animal existance forever. Its not circumstance at all, its initiative driven by intelligence.

  • @gunninlinguist that there's something out there, but if home is fine, that doesn't stimulate that much to go out elsewhere. ALSO, home is fine for them, however it wasn't amazing like it was in the MIddle East and elsewhere where they can have the luxury of different jobs. They were literally in that midzone of excess and scarce. I just don't understand the point of differentiating us. This was the same reason why labor unions took so long to be powerful in the late 19th and early 20th century.

  • "Unfortunately for Papuans theres still a huge gap to overcome."

    Yeah, an IQ gap. You know general intelligence & mental ingenuity? Inheritable genetic differences from divergent evolution? Basic fucking reality? Papuans would have invented helicopters and we would have been savages? Fuck off. Island environment aren't conducive to tech advancement maybe but If they were actually smart they would have eventually migrated to a better environment &had more ambition like other higher races did.

  • @gunninlinguist You're an idiot. Higher Races? First of all there is only one race, the human race which started in Africa. How is that proven? Every homosapian has a strand of DNA that comes from a single African Tribe so to say that there are higher races you would then have to admit that Africans are that race. You need to continue to get an education and not one that caters to what you want to know but an education that frees your ignorant mind. White power right?....

  • Exactly. We evolved from Africans by being forced to adapt to cold climate. I'm not getting your White power/Asian power reference? Seems like an oblique response to what I was saying as I was describing the comparative prowess of an Eastern Asiatic race (who evolved separately and aren't our predecessors btw).

    Openminded & more intelligent aye? Because you can regurgitate a bunch of tired PC cliches on cue&type "imbecile" at someone? Riiight.

  • @gunninlinguist Well white people descended from Asians so shouldnt it be Asian power.. I cant stand stupid people and you my dear are an imbecile.

  • Who are you gonna believe? This old fruit or Charles Darwin. Read the Descent of Man, it'll wash this sickening garbage right out your head.

  • I feel as if an even more important question was ignored.

    "What is the burden of having so much cargo?"

    Sure it can be a basis on which to build great societies, but it definitely seems to come at a cost that a simpler way of life would not.

  • He forgets to mention luck. So many battles that have changed the world could have turned the other way if it wasn't for chance. For example, Japan could have won WW2 if they won the battle of midway. But american bombers luckily spotted their fleet and bombed the shit out of it. Chance saved america.

  • I pretty much agree with Diamond's thesis. It's well-reasoned and very good. I also agree with him when, in the final chapters of his book, he touches on why EUROPE and not, say, China conquered the New World and industrialized. He mentioned the decentralization of power in Europe (again, thanks to geography) as compared to China. In China, one emperor's decision can set back society by decades (the destruction of the treasure ships). Not so for Europe. Decentralization of power is key.

  • I recommend Diamond's book 'Collapse,' for a look at how the choices humans make determine the fate of cultures.

  • American life wouldn't be possible without crops from the fertile crescent?

    Huh?  Maize is the most consumed grain crop in the world by calorie.

    Tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, beans, squash, etc...

    Diamond's theory is fundamentally wrong.

  • @wrolph I think you have to factor in the absence of domesticable animals in the Americas. Corn, beans, and squash were planted and reaped by hand here.

  • @wrolph Did you even watch the video?

  • While geography certainly played a great deal in the inequalities of the world, it isn't everything. Vast areas of Eurasia had the conditions to grow crops and raise domesticated animals, yet vast inequalities still lay between them.

  • ...and your people would have been WHITE, because it is also determined by geography. So skin color has to do with is after all, thought not as a cause but as an consequence =)

  • bloody white fella

  • western world has declined after ww2 and Eastern people have risen...after major wars peoples love for technology had declind because of the horrors..and they have chosen rock and roll and blackberries and rap to enjoy themselves instead of listning to Mazart or Beathowan.

    Germany is a great country but the world must throw away all the bad culture so everyone can learn good from each other.

  • Well Euopeans have more educational skills, but Nobel Price was won by many eastern countries not 2 Japanese 3 times India.. and look at the Field Medal, and Abels price. Besides Nobel Price is not nessasrily the most advanced. By the way Europe has more educational values than other countries. East joined in to the science only few decades ago.

    Bit of Russian eh? Ha ha ha haha Russia rule the intellectual world. A Russian won the Millanium Price..

  • This is seriously flawed. It makes no mention of fishing, sailing and navigation, and astronomical knowledge, which prehistoric humans were capable of, and which was crucial to successful civilisations.

  • Imperium Europa:

    The Book that changed the world.

    Amazon Books

  • @jboycep

    That would be difficult now that he's dead. BTW, I'm not Black.

  • they missed the point in time of building a hierarchy within sociaty ,onset of religion and slavery. no civilization prospered witut those ingredients

  • the most important thing is forgotten in this docu ,nothing makes a culture technologically develop more than WAR.cultures around the mediterranean sea use to fight each other all the time thats why they were more advanced that others .a modern example of that is the 2 world wars . bronze and steel were invented to make better weapons not for agriculture's tools.

  • @satyrisisxxx

    Competition between states was a spur to innovation in Europe, but war also impeded economic development. China's greatest advances came in periods of peace. The Franco-Habsburg wars undermined Italian economies, the Thirty Years War was a disaster for Germany and Louis XIV's wars drained France and the Netherlands. World growth slowed in 1914-45 and Europe's best growth rates came in 1950-80. Conflict can be a spur to technological progress, but it's nothing like so mechanistic.

  • well lot of people knew how to make weapons out of metal and also advanced agricultural techniques such as dams and making huge religous structures. India have had very little wars, India was the first place on earth to use calculus to prove that

    sin x= x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! ....

    and calculate the value of pie to some big amount.

    but Europeans were changed by the Steam Engine and the gun.. not by war. War came later. the war europeans fought was savage when Romans first arrived.

  • Comment removed

  • YOU want to talk to me about MATH? Just because a asian is fond of simple math and like to memorize baby level equations.. DOESNT mean they know the deepest most complex version of math. LOOK up string theory, or quantum physics buddy i speak on facts! Yes the truth hurts but your delusional lol for real. It is quite evident we are far ahead of our times and we are controlled by our leaders much more civilized and CONTROLLED. They want the majority to be dumb but they let the bright ones shine.

  • HA HA HAH AH HA HA HA HA MATH?

    "dude dude yo yo" cant even speak english and now ruining the name of a great subject

    Its not math uneducated asshole, it is Mathematics.

    "Just because a asian is fond of simple math and like to memorize baby level equations"

    This shows how much you know about the subject. complex algebric relations like the sin x series discovered in India centuries before calculus nobody knows how. Stop using Indian numbers. use Roman numbers ha ha ha

  • uneducated? Your going to judge me based on a youtube comment? I dont have any respect for you so why should i go over it? I write one time and send you fool. Do you not understand what i meant when i said math? You think what you just stated is complex math? The math used in string theory is pure white. Indian lol, you guys are so lazy that you just let dirt pile up. India has a billion people yet they barley impact society. GIVE ME A BREAK FOOL. Your Continent is all talk,dirty and delusional.

  • String theory is a physics theory.

    well you just said that String theory was so advanced and Algebra is not advanced. that shows your education. None of the people who would do phd in science would dare to touch the sacret and complex and the most pure form of mathematics in Algebra.

  • Indians are lazy, and chinese are "TRY-HARDS". You make no legit points because just zoom out on the world and look around you. European mentality is all based on quality while asian mentality is based on price. HOW are you going to do anything in life when you dont seek whats best? FACE it the west has the world by the balls in a very friendly manner.Didn't like a couple of hundred british men take control of india while back? How complex are you if it was that easy fool? GET REAL.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • You have no idea about what is going on in intelligent subjects. You think that counries like America England and Germany are on the top. Now uits hard to invent anything, if uyou look at examination results of the most difficult exams, Eastern Europe with Russia Iran etc and East Asia including Vietnam and China are on top. THose exams are hard, Einstien or any string theorist is challanged by them.

  • AHAHHA again your talking non-sense. Dude you are a fool ahhaha seriously. The most elite scientists are from america or europe. PERIOD, dont give me some test thats meant for the majority. THE MAJORITY means NOTHING alright . Majority of any race are a bunch of sheep. Your clueless man. Its like me going up to michael jordan and telling him that i just made 20 shots in a row. White specie can think at a deeper level. Stop talking about majorities when majority are sheep.

  • Honkey what the fuck are u talking about u caspers never came up with your own language europeans languages came form the middle east but i bet u dont know that do u stupid asshole the white race are devils u killed jesus u guys are mutants just like the white roach or white anything for that matter

  • JESUS? are we going to start debating about religion? Only fools believe in man made stories of god etc. We do not know god PERIOD, show me a autograph of god and il believe you lol. FOOL. I think you are mistaking day and night with heaven and hell lol. Face the facts the Bilderberg Group runs this globe and there is nothing you can do about it. You can go and talk about ur delusional ideas on how the east is this and that lol but zoom out and you realize your in SHIT. Evolution=WHITE tytyty;)

  • @atp6pac Evolution?!?!?!? more like mutantions just like the white roach or white anything for that matter dont be mad at me cause u have no fossils for u dating back 5000bc peace

  • @getuga22 uhhh why were some of the earliest humanoids found in caves in FRANCE? Trust me I am not mad at you for being a modern slave tool for the white man lol. You got nothing on me bush monkey and i speak with facts again. You are delusional just like people who believe the bible was made by god. LOOKup the BILDERBERG group and see how hopeless you really are when it comes to anything. Must of been some great mutations because results speak for themselves. I can get your gf in front of u lol

  • Comment removed

  • @alp6pac umm nothing look it up scientists(white scientists mind u ) even found that todays caspers CANNOT trace their dna back to ancient honkeys why is that? Humaniods found in France LOL please show me the bones of this u honkeys came around 12000bc at the most you demons are mutants of us inbreding when africans got trapped in europe from the when the land masses seperated and maybe from the caucusian mountains no wonder u guys are crazy

  • I didnt say more skills I mean more educational values. People in east are not 100% in to these things..some are still doing folk culture but still the little have proved very important

    If Romania was like other western countries they will be just in the same ditch. I have met some Romanians who had realy high standards of decipline.

    ww3 will not happen. How can ww3 happen when America couldnt take even the Vietnam war? world war 3 isuseless and kills important people

  • ahhaha are you seriously talking about vietnam? Vietnam was a great way to test weapons out at the time like lab rats. Come on if USA werent who they are , they wouldnt be in IRAQ doing what they want lol. Or did you notice how fast russia pulled out of georgia?! weeks man weeks, USA would never listen to dirty russians. There is no decline in the west intelligence wise, the IQ around the world is getting higher and higher. EVOLUTION OF KNOWLEDGE! All they gotta do to vietnam now is UAV scan

  • UAV scan the jungles and BOOM its game over lol plus the technology usa uses is just baby talk compared to what they have. U know asia is talking the talk but they aint walking my friend. SURE modern slave (china) are gaining wealth but so would africa if the west made everything there instead.Sorry pal I look for talent and the west has far superior talent.God usa made you guys delusional, they just want you guys to do something but you dont have the power to do so or knowledge . FACE IT

  • OF course world war 3 wont happen. WHO can take on the bilderberg group? They control everyone like puppets and do what they want. Throw innocent Americans to steal oil from that rat race iraq. I mean beside the technology factor (west far superior) besides that , have you not looked where the western countries are located around the world?! Have you ever played command and conquer and felt the benefit of spreading your bases? I mean the east is just surrounded and left hopeless.

  • @atp6pac I'll bet money there's earlier ones from Africa. Because *Africa*, not Europe, is the place where humans come from. It has been proven by piles and piles and piles of evidence and research accumulated over many decades. Can you refute that truly massive amount of evidence?

  • Bulgarea and India are playing because they have defeated oithers like Americamns Russians, Chinese and Japanese and Germans..You are an asshole that no one loves because you got no knowladge. Bulgarea is the smallest country in the world that have won gold medals at Olympiad. and Nobel price was won by India 3 times..Chinese children compete onbehalf of western countries against china..

  • buddy its like 35 percent Asian where i live in Canada. All i see is them trying hard but there is no true talent. Some geeky ugly white nerd is always the smartest. Imagine if Romania had a billion people, Wouldn't it be true to say that they will push out more talent than the Chinese if they had a billion. Either way look at life and you will see who is winning. THE WEST .. Period. Do not judge the majority because majority are sheep. Just wait for WW3 and you will see who has the knowledge

  • Well for a Hydrogen bomb that can break the earth in two, does stratogy realy matters?

  • AND remember what you are used for. JUST because it is MADE IN CHINA, does not mean it is made by china. Most factories there only require a monkey for the push of a button but you guys got it in ur brain that you make it lol. GIVE me a break and take a seat pal. Germany with 80million people exports just as much as the chinese BUT is the QUALITY the same HELLL NO Germans are superior 1000 fold on the chinese .FACTS buddy FACTS The people in power have far deeper knowledge than a easy math test

  • middle east? All languages came from Sanscrit. You never say that European Languaes are Middle Eastern European, they are INDO-europeans..

    but Middle Asia is very advanced. may be they have no so much technology because of economics, but they make good mathematicians..

  • @goodluckpeace44

    Indo-european because both does share the same roots, not because it all comes from India. Sanscrit only is a language derived from the common trunk from wich also derived latin, iranian, greek, or german.

  • You are an idiot and aany European will think that. You think that String Theory is a genius math when you know nothing about it, if you knew you would have known of few of the Chinese Mathematicians who are interested in that. There are just as mucha s Eastern Field Medalists and Abel Price Winners just as much as in Europe. If you want to know about mathematics search Abel priZe and Field Medal. not some physics..Physics is too materialistic for the East.

  • Besides if I was an idiot like you I would have said that Switzerland is only good at making chocolates, but I like Switzerland Romania and Germany out of many great countries in history. India make the worlds faster Nuclear missile..you know that? And India is the current Chess champion and now competing against Bulgarea..

  • YES i am an IDIOT?! I think you are delusional and that is the fact of life buddy. You need a wake up call because you do not understand numbers. Do you think its coincidence that the two most high tech countries in Asia are South Korea and JAPAN? Or do you think its because they bonded with the west?! WAKE up dude your a fool. INDIA lol india has a billion people and is playing chess with bulgaria who has like 15million ppl or even less. HUMAN TALENT is what i am talking about and what matters

  • You are an idiot because Belgium makes the best chocolate lol. IF it werent for my race, we would still be in the dark friend. YES i went through the list who won NOBEL prizes( 70 percent european with a bit of russian and 2 japs (WOOOOOWW). Dont you see what the west is doing fool, its like that kid who is playing basketball. Sure make that kid feel like he is doing soo good at it but u know you are an adult and can strip him of his pride. THAT IS WAT IS HAPPENING! We got more skill son

  • I also live in Canada, I think you are a proud Romanian or a very upset white guy about being white...

    Vietnam is a top country in IQ and mathematics.

    You think that Russia will allow their sweet friends to be just tortured with some stupid scan? Vietnamese went by a small bamboo raft and sunk an American ship.

    I dont talk shit about America because America is important. but dont undestimate. Americans were not able to outsmart Vietnam

  • @atp6pac And you keep mentioning all these achievements and wonders of Europe, but leaving out all the grim and dark, ugly things Europeans have done as well, often against the "other" you seem to despise so much. Which of course shows the "white man" to not be as "superior" as thought, esp. in the areas that really matter (how good one is as a human being).

  • Come on bro look at the stats! We are a more curious people PERIOD. You can try hard but we do it naturally. We run this town and you know it B. The west including South Korea and Japan are just dominating. Also do you think its odd how the two most high tech countries in Asia are America's bitches? THINK about it you chip on your shoulder fool.

  • @atp6pac Care to provide some evidence? Remember, you've got to prove it's *racial genetics* more than *any* other factor.

  • And America is the bitch of China and Russia. China is further ahead, economically, technologically, and is the newest super power on the globe. Russia has the best Naval and Air force, as well as a division of Snow Troopers that can take the Alaskan Troopers any day. Also I'm not sure where your info is coming from but America is doing the exact opposite of dominating Japan and Korea. Japan Is moving ahead with their technology since military efforts are forbidden by the Pearl Harbor treaty.

  • @PlatinumPickled WOW you are delusional huh lol. China has better technology than the us lol. HAHAHA THATS so delusional buddy your on crack but I dont blame you. You mistake MADE in CHINA with MADE BY CHINA, china is the bitch thats for sure and the technology is nothing but american or western. Why you think MAC is always on the leading edge of tech? You are seriously funny ahhaha Bilderberg has everyone by the balls and you dont even know it ahha CHINA and russia are nothing but people

  • Korea's military is anything but afraid of the U.S. I'm not sure where you've been living the past few decades but America is falling way behind. Where no longer the country that landed on the moon, the days of American innovation have long been over. Where also the most destructive to the environment. Whether you believe this is is bad thing or not this much can't be denied. Industrial society relies heavily on non-renewable resources and we destroy to many renewable resources in the process.

  • This will eventually level us with nothing to support ourselves on eventually, and at that point the population will be so high that it will literally just choke and die. People will be starving in the streets of America with nothing to feed themselves with. Everything from ipods to bulldozers will be useless wastes of space with out the resources to run them. America will become one giant hell hole and knowing the American way of thinking; we'll try to drag the rest of the world with us.