Piaget - Stage 3 - Concrete - Reversibility

[shirleykohw]

Have acquired the cognitive ability of Decentration and reversibility

[Liboo52]

is this reversibility or conservation?

[funnyhaha71]

@Liboo52 It is both conservation and reversibility.

[1tawonda]

Well, that tells me that you are the dumb-ass (funny flirt talks) you need to pay attention to the most important factor, the age of the children, and what they can perceive at this age ( its a child' mind). You're how old now, I think its time you go back and finish high school with your wanna be super smart ass. You are the unintelligent one.

[FunnyFlirtTalks]

Its funny how they consider this smart LOL DUMBASSES...

[zerocheese]

Because bitch i just saw you poor that glass into that glass!

[philipgeorge1991]

@zerocheese learn to spell before you attempt to understand jean piaget dumbs

[philipgeorge1991]

@philipgeorge1991 dumbass*

[zerocheese]

@philipgeorge1991 @philipgeorge1991 Don't mistake an error with lack of intelligence, troll.

[Chaloupe89]

Everybody saw that film in college.

[aliesneo]

and hence, the tea party was born... i guess it proves what we all hold to be true: the tea party members have been trapped in infancy with regards to their perception of reality. its not a matter of silliness, its merely a matter of stunted growth with the teabaggers.

[TheLeon4321]

@aliesneo What are you saying here?

[aliesneo]

@TheLeon4321 humor...

[kiminokami]

@aliesneo So your joke just happened to include the words "tea party" and you don't really think that the real tea party is in any way deficient as compared with other populations?

[aliesneo]

@kiminokami i hate to pass judgement on a political party that has an opinion other than mine, since any judgement is going to be biased. nevertheless, what i was trying say is that since perception changes with age, the world view of the tea party suggests that their perception is yet to mature to adult levels.

[inkster]

awe, her explanation is so cute. i wonder if these testers ever encounter super smart children that have all these stages mastered before they're "old enough"

[AlienCow6991]

this kid is smarter then the white kid on the 2 video :D thank gid I wanted to shake the white kid for being so stupid

[Lilokitax]

@AlienCow6991 It's seems to me that the stupid, here, is you. Can't you see that this girl is older than the other one, in the second video? These two children are in different cognitive stages! Let me tell you a secret: when you were a child, you were as "stupid" as the girl in the second video. All the children, in that age, will give the same answers when asked the same questions. Go study some Psychology and you'll understand it.

[nightsauce]

WTF is juice? THAT LOOKS LIKE BLUE DRINK!!!

[reiyu013]

kool aid

[240sxv8]

Purple drank for the black kid!!!!

[metallica41070]

ITS SODA POP NOT JUICE

[hpufo]

@metallica41070 Sodapop? Are you from the 60's?

[KypHeM]

ok this one is not that dumb at all.

[DazeWolf]

It's so crazy how dramatically perception changes with just a few added years! She was very good at explaining her reasoning too.

[alex2003991]

The purpose of this is to show that the black girl at the end is smart... lmao... Affirmative Action

[MrPkownzz]

@alex2003991 duh elo is vry god afrmtve actin

[minion023]

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

[tonybeir]

This is why psychology is such a bullshit non-science. Can you think of the uncontrolled variables in this "experiment" ? How about the fact that when the researcher pours the cup in the new glass she asks the child "HOW ABOUT NOW? ARE THEY THE SAME?" She makes a change and illicits a different response from the child from her position of authority. This isn't testing children for their ability to perceive equal liquid quantities rather it's testing their eagerness to follow instructions.

[mp3dogg]

@tonybeir That is NOT what she said. Your quote is invalid.

[tonybeir]

@mp3dogg same effect

[Epeated]

@tonybeir haha why do you even think she said that?

[SinfulBrigadeTLD]

@tonybeir Psychology is one of the most valid fields of science, and probably the most pertinent.

[tonybeir]

@SinfulBrigadeTLD bullshit. pseudo science. it has a long way to go before it's legitimate. Look at the studies... therapy at a psychologist office doesn't have anything to do with technique, method, or the science being used to treat the patients. The studies shows that trained psychologists with decades of experience do as well as untrained students. It's all about how friendly and how well the therapists gets along with the patient.

[ChristopherDone]

@SinfulBrigadeTLD I don't agree with tonybeir too much, though he's right to question experiment bias. But your “Psychology is one of the most valid fields of science” comment is kinda funny. Maybe the pursuit to understand the human mind is valid, but the results of psychology aren't "the most valid" by any stretch of the word. Half of the time it's barely scientific.

[cookiebox339]

parents taught her right

[gingerkid963]

so if she was displaying concrete reversibility, she would be able to say "because you just poured that juice into the other glass, and they were even before"?

[Liteboyiam]

at what age does this crossover usually happen on average?

[tehnatsu]

@Liteboyiam 5/6

[joshc5427]

Kid- "Both the same"

Tester- "Why?"

Kid- "Because neither contain juice, they both appear to contain antifreeze."

Tester- "Very good."

[Floopman15]

@joshc5427 bahaha

[ArchiPepper]

@joshc5427 Antifreeze is green silly!

[santoro2020]

@joshc5427 Surprised she didn't say Kool-Aid! haha

[BlatantlyBritt]

@joshc5427 Oh my god, you made me crack up laughing!

[FeelFree3]

@joshc5427 Yes what a misleading tester. What if the kid drinks them?

[QuestionYourMind]

the experimenter totally inched the skinny glass toward the kid with her finger. how suggestive!

[SuperHurra]

I'm not sure if that demonstrates reversibility.

She didn't say ,"Because all you did was pour that juice into the taller glass!"

She noted that one of the glasses was taller, meaning that it could handle the same amount of juice, but the volume would be distributed vertically. I'd say that it shows that the girl can understand the concept of fluids.

[jboggey1993]

This is conervation of volume.

[christinasketo]

what was the purpose of this experiment?

[cayenneforever]

This is conservation, not reversability.

[rimiwhat]

@cayenneforever but in Piagetian terms, it is reversibility. It just means that she's able to understand that the action of pouring the water can be reversed, and therefore understand that they are the same volume.

[graveey]

i dont get it though, surely the one on the right has more liquid in it cos its taller?? oops, time to change my shit bag again...

[TheClearRain]

omg they asked me this stuff tooo! except they went with mental problems...

[MrMCruso]

Very interesting stuff!



[urtime59]

what a retard, my mentally handicapped dog could figure this out

[gudgurlgonebadd]

@urtime59 ur an idiot

[jandj094]

@urtime59 hey, she got it right didn't she?

[jboggey1993]

@jandj094 Yep

[urtime59]

what a dumb girl

[ryanspencer1124]

@jairoller4life

thanks for the laugh

[ryanspencer1124]

@jairoller4life

thanks for the laugh...i half expected it to be a legit response until i got past the comma

[jairoller4life]

when i was 7 i went through this same kind of exercise; when she asked me if they were still the same, i threw the juice in her face and asked her if she thinks im stupid or something

[ke11yke11z]

@jairoller4life I would have done the SAME exact thing. I hate it wen people try to make me feel or look stupid. what's your problem.

[DritonGusia]

well, he's old enough to know LOL :-) sweetie

But this is interesting when tested in children of age 2-7 (Piaget's second stage, the preoperational stage), children in that stage thing the taller one has the same amount...

This test is about conservation

[NoLifeGamer17]

Why are all the kids girls? Is this video trying to say that girls are dumb? (....because they're right! Hahah, no no. I-I'm kidding. :D )

[00samarkand00]

she is a genius

[spegg89]

@00samarkand00

not really most children over the age of seven (concrete operations stage) would grasp this

[utubesgettingboring]

what the heck this girl is much older then the rest of the kids

why would they do the same tests on her as the younger kids?

[lavenderspike]

it shows that age influences perception.

[zwartrijder91]

@lavenderspike

What are your thoughts about that men itself can be the influent to learn the child about measures?

[EPTworld]

@lavenderspike what

[TheKingdomofErnor]

@lavenderspike No, it definitely doesn't. It shows that perception can change with learning (which can be gained with age). Age itself, however, does not imply perception.

[uriahsw]

@lavenderspike Yes, until you reach stage 4, then you're done. So by adolescence (which is loosely defined), age becomes an insignificant variable. At which point other variables take over, such as the three e's... education, experiences, etc.

[JDaKingman]

@lavenderspike I agree,very sad.

[Norb1t9]

to show you that she is at a different developmental stage duh! didn't you see the title that said: CONCRETE-REVERSIBILITY??

[ThoriaBladecadas]

To prove that kids in this stage (stage 3) can perform successfully work out mass, volume weight tasks and the kids in the other 2 stages below this one can't.

It's just that simple.

[samanthak13]

yuhhhh good job she knows what the deal is

[everall23]

She's still a lot smarter than most kids today. Sadly.

[carterzerius]

why is that sad

[Tenoch1]

She is older than the other girls!

[soccerkeeper13]

The whole idea of Piaget's stages of cognitive development is that infants are at a cognitively primitive level and progress in different stages. This one is from age 7-11.

[kellouuu]

Yes she is ...

it is by age ....hmmm

1-Sensorimotor stage: from birth to age

2-Preoperational stage: from ages 2 to 7

3-Concrete operational stage: from ages 7 to 12

[pot0tin]

that's the point!