There are many irregular verbs where the past tense is the same as the past participle. For example: bet (bet, bet), bring (brought, brought), build (built, built), catch (caught, caught), etc...
Why is it "has run" instead of "has ran" then? so confusing
Regarding your comment on "I was beaten" in response to some earlier comments, what do you mean when you say that this is a form of past passive tense but not past participle? "Beaten" here is still the past participle form of "beat" isn't it?
I've read elsewhere that the past participle is to be used whenever there is an auxillary verb separating the subject of the sentence and the verb, otherwise the past tense is used - eg I swam uses the past tense whereas I have swum uses the past participle. But what about "I was bored"? According to the rule above, "bored" here is the past participle but it doesn't satisfy your rule about using a form of "to have". Can the past participle be used with auxillary verbs like "do" and "was" too?
@tudormonarch It's not true that past participles invariably follow auxiliary verbs. Consider "I am swimming" (present participle following "am") or "I do care" (root form following "do") or "I have been thinking" (present participle following "have" and "been"). "I was bored," however, is something quite different. "Was" in that sentence is a main verb, not an auxiliary. Auxiliaries are followed by other verbs, but "bored" here is an adjective, as "sleepy" is in "I was sleepy."
@mrthoth I don't understand how your first example (re a present participle) demonstrates your point that past participles don't always following auxilliary verbs. As to your 2nd point, accepting that "was" is a main verb, does "I was bored" use the past participle or the past tense of bored (I'm unclear now)? If the former, does using a verb as an adjective always involving using its past participle form? Finally, is the active/passive voice the only real significance of knowing participles?
@shakespeare5555 It's "been rerun." The race has been run and rerun (not ran and reran). The program has been run and rerun. The dishwasher has been run and rerun. When you've got "has been BLANKED," the "BLANKED" is always going to be a past participle, and "ran" and "reran" are not past participles; they are past tense.
@mrthoth Thanks so much! I get it now. I will share your videos with some of my co-workers. They will love them. I would like to practice what I'm learning from your videos. Should I try to find workbooks? What would you suggest?
the only thing i knew is that when you're using was, there's should be a specific time.. for example.. I walked yesterday... Yesterday is the specific day.. and if there is have, there's no specific time for example, i have walked...
I haven't heard that before, and I don't think it works. Consider this sentence: "In my boyhood, I played with my friends in the streets." No specific time is indicated; the action took place repeatedly, presumably. Consider this: "I have bought the milk, as you requested." That sounds like a one-time, temporally precise action.
OMG.. Seriously.. coz i think ive read that in one of my old books.. but maybe i just didnt understand it and need to read it twice or more.. heheheh. it's really hard to practice english if you're born outside the US.. can you also do a tutorial for 'had had or have had' thing.. coz i seriously dont understand it..
Brilliant stuff man. I wish my teachers back in those days had been as excellent as you are today. This is so refreshing too. It's like being in school again except this time around I'm actually learning.
'Yesterday I have walked'. 'Yesterday I had walked already this week'. Both of those sentences sound extremely strange. I'd go as far as to say that they sound grammatically incorrect (that's not to say that they are - they just sound very strange).
Also, you'd never say 'years ago I had been happy'. You'd surely say 'I was happy years ago'. I think that it would be better if the examples provided were sentences which can actually used in everyday spoken and written English.
Thanks for your comment! "Yesterday I have walked" is grammatically incorrect, and I don't think it appears in the video. "Yesterday I had walked already this week" is just fine, and could show up in everyday conversation. ("You would have slept soundly last night if you'd had any exercise lately" "But yesterday I had walked already this week.")
Sorry, you said 'I have walked' in connection with yesterday at 1:13.
'But yesterday I had walked already this week' (at least not in British English). Essentially you'd be stating that at some point yesterday you were in the state of having walked earlier in the week so surely saying 'But I'd already been for a walk this week' would be the appropriate response.
In fact a simple 'but I had exercised' would be better but not necessarily useful in the context of this lesson.
I find it rather strange that you are comparing both the present progressive and the past perfect, in this video. Generally, one would compare the same form in both present and past.
It makes no difference whether you use "have" or "had". The sentences "I have won" and "I had won" both conclude with the past participle "won." But in "I won", "won" is the past tense, not the past participle. The past tense and past participle of "win" are identical (viz. "won"), but they differ in other irregular verbs, like "sing" ("sang" and "sung," respectively). When the action takes place in the past and the verb is one word long, it's always the past tense.
These aren't past participles. It's a form of past passive voice. When you don't know the subject or don't want to mention it or when it isn't really necessary to use it, you use passive voice.
I.e. I was beaten by this man, it was eaten by a snake, etc..
In these examples, you could remove the subject "by this man' or "by a snake" if it isn't important to use it.
Good question. When the past participle is used along with a form of "to be", the result is a verb in what is called the passive voice (as in "I was beaten"). You can check out my video on the passive voice for more information.
Thanks so much for your videos ! I am an ESL teacher and really appreciate your teaching style. You make things so easy to understand. Thanks again for taking the time to make these videos for us. : )
Yes! You can use the word "did" the work yesterday. The past participle would be the word "done." I had already "done" the work before 3:00 p.m yesterday.
This video made my score from 0 to 10
Hacides 2 days ago
Thanks a lot I go to an online school (keystone middle) and you helped me understand this concept.
Danster547 9 months ago
There are many irregular verbs where the past tense is the same as the past participle. For example: bet (bet, bet), bring (brought, brought), build (built, built), catch (caught, caught), etc...
Why is it "has run" instead of "has ran" then? so confusing
SGCRCT 10 months ago
Regarding your comment on "I was beaten" in response to some earlier comments, what do you mean when you say that this is a form of past passive tense but not past participle? "Beaten" here is still the past participle form of "beat" isn't it?
tudormonarch 11 months ago
I've read elsewhere that the past participle is to be used whenever there is an auxillary verb separating the subject of the sentence and the verb, otherwise the past tense is used - eg I swam uses the past tense whereas I have swum uses the past participle. But what about "I was bored"? According to the rule above, "bored" here is the past participle but it doesn't satisfy your rule about using a form of "to have". Can the past participle be used with auxillary verbs like "do" and "was" too?
tudormonarch 1 year ago
@tudormonarch It's not true that past participles invariably follow auxiliary verbs. Consider "I am swimming" (present participle following "am") or "I do care" (root form following "do") or "I have been thinking" (present participle following "have" and "been"). "I was bored," however, is something quite different. "Was" in that sentence is a main verb, not an auxiliary. Auxiliaries are followed by other verbs, but "bored" here is an adjective, as "sleepy" is in "I was sleepy."
mrthoth 1 year ago
Comment removed
tudormonarch 11 months ago
Comment removed
tudormonarch 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrthoth I don't understand how your first example (re a present participle) demonstrates your point that past participles don't always following auxilliary verbs. As to your 2nd point, accepting that "was" is a main verb, does "I was bored" use the past participle or the past tense of bored (I'm unclear now)? If the former, does using a verb as an adjective always involving using its past participle form? Finally, is the active/passive voice the only real significance of knowing participles?
tudormonarch 11 months ago
you should teach my teacher. she's been harping this crap for weeks and i didn't get it. Watched this video and in five minutes i got it. wth?
dragonmaiden50 1 year ago 2
You explain this very well. Thank you for this video.
agoodfedora 1 year ago
Great lessons! I have a question.
I'm a computer programmer. We often say, "Program 5 has been rerun".
Is it correct to say, "Program 5 has been reran"?
I could not find a definition for the word "rerun" used in this way.
Thanks.
shakespeare5555 1 year ago
@shakespeare5555 It's "been rerun." The race has been run and rerun (not ran and reran). The program has been run and rerun. The dishwasher has been run and rerun. When you've got "has been BLANKED," the "BLANKED" is always going to be a past participle, and "ran" and "reran" are not past participles; they are past tense.
mrthoth 1 year ago
@mrthoth Thanks so much! I get it now. I will share your videos with some of my co-workers. They will love them. I would like to practice what I'm learning from your videos. Should I try to find workbooks? What would you suggest?
shakespeare5555 1 year ago
Comment removed
shakespeare5555 1 year ago
Thank you very much for your help, your class is very nice and is teaching me a lot... Please do more videos for the pass participle...
itzah10 1 year ago
this is the most difficult topic i ever knew so far...
marshmallow1507 1 year ago
question...
the only thing i knew is that when you're using was, there's should be a specific time.. for example.. I walked yesterday... Yesterday is the specific day.. and if there is have, there's no specific time for example, i have walked...
and the question is.. am i right???
marshmallow1507 1 year ago
I haven't heard that before, and I don't think it works. Consider this sentence: "In my boyhood, I played with my friends in the streets." No specific time is indicated; the action took place repeatedly, presumably. Consider this: "I have bought the milk, as you requested." That sounds like a one-time, temporally precise action.
mrthoth 1 year ago
OMG.. Seriously.. coz i think ive read that in one of my old books.. but maybe i just didnt understand it and need to read it twice or more.. heheheh. it's really hard to practice english if you're born outside the US.. can you also do a tutorial for 'had had or have had' thing.. coz i seriously dont understand it..
marshmallow1507 1 year ago
How would you classify present participles that follow forms of "to go" or other movement/position words?
For example:
I went swimming.
She came running down the hall.
I lay looking at the clouds.
Thanks!
scubes10 1 year ago
What does 'auxiliary' mean? ;D
Socratease1 1 year ago
Good work.
Socratease1 1 year ago
Brilliant stuff man. I wish my teachers back in those days had been as excellent as you are today. This is so refreshing too. It's like being in school again except this time around I'm actually learning.
HigherPlanes 2 years ago
'Yesterday I have walked'. 'Yesterday I had walked already this week'. Both of those sentences sound extremely strange. I'd go as far as to say that they sound grammatically incorrect (that's not to say that they are - they just sound very strange).
Also, you'd never say 'years ago I had been happy'. You'd surely say 'I was happy years ago'. I think that it would be better if the examples provided were sentences which can actually used in everyday spoken and written English.
SwitchRich 2 years ago
Thanks for your comment! "Yesterday I have walked" is grammatically incorrect, and I don't think it appears in the video. "Yesterday I had walked already this week" is just fine, and could show up in everyday conversation. ("You would have slept soundly last night if you'd had any exercise lately" "But yesterday I had walked already this week.")
mrthoth 2 years ago
@mrthoth
Sorry, you said 'I have walked' in connection with yesterday at 1:13.
'But yesterday I had walked already this week' (at least not in British English). Essentially you'd be stating that at some point yesterday you were in the state of having walked earlier in the week so surely saying 'But I'd already been for a walk this week' would be the appropriate response.
In fact a simple 'but I had exercised' would be better but not necessarily useful in the context of this lesson.
SwitchRich 2 years ago
We agree! At 1:13 I said, "I have walked," and "I have walked" is a good sentence.
mrthoth 2 years ago
Thanks. :)
TheLarssan 2 years ago
When did we start pronouncing "been" as "bin"?
He makes a lot of statements that are not correct.
kitosdad 2 years ago
Today.
ddsharper 2 years ago 2
nice big words mrthoth
tdog661 2 years ago
I find it rather strange that you are comparing both the present progressive and the past perfect, in this video. Generally, one would compare the same form in both present and past.
dxg9012 2 years ago
thank you very much
ceto301 2 years ago
I have been looking for a good present perfect porgressive verb.
racon2r 2 years ago
Thank you, Now it's more clear to me.
exabes 2 years ago
Thanks!
jsong103 2 years ago
wait, was the past participle a "have" (as in have walked, have run, have broken, etc.) or "had" (as in had walked, had run, had broken)?
sunnyxlove1990 2 years ago
Past participle always uses "had" as the helping or auxiliary verb.
I.e. I had walked 1 mile before my phone rang.
I had gone to the meeting before my wife woke up.
Hope that helps...
You're doing a good job on grammar lessons, mrthoth. Keep it up.
MasterBott01 2 years ago
It makes no difference whether you use "have" or "had". The sentences "I have won" and "I had won" both conclude with the past participle "won." But in "I won", "won" is the past tense, not the past participle. The past tense and past participle of "win" are identical (viz. "won"), but they differ in other irregular verbs, like "sing" ("sang" and "sung," respectively). When the action takes place in the past and the verb is one word long, it's always the past tense.
mrthoth 2 years ago
thank you!!! Ur explanation is so clear and understandable!
thanks again Yossarian, and keep making great videos! It helps a lot :)
sunnyxlove1990 2 years ago
Get your hand out of your pocket! Are you playing with yourself?
liuzhou 3 years ago
This is pretty good, but what about the past participles that are used in conjunction with to be? I was beaten, It was eaten, etc..?
greedybones 3 years ago
These aren't past participles. It's a form of past passive voice. When you don't know the subject or don't want to mention it or when it isn't really necessary to use it, you use passive voice.
I.e. I was beaten by this man, it was eaten by a snake, etc..
In these examples, you could remove the subject "by this man' or "by a snake" if it isn't important to use it.
Hope that helps
MasterBott01 2 years ago 2
Good question. When the past participle is used along with a form of "to be", the result is a verb in what is called the passive voice (as in "I was beaten"). You can check out my video on the passive voice for more information.
mrthoth 2 years ago
omg... I understood everything :P
Thanks a lot
cartoni21 3 years ago
Excellent job, man! He is a MAN!!!!!
orazalinz 3 years ago 2
thank you very much, i'm not a native speaker and i'm about to go to college in a few days .
kornbizkit16 3 years ago
Can you do a video on past and present progressive verbs and perfect progressive verbs? We are desperate?
peanuts122396 3 years ago
Thanks so much for your videos ! I am an ESL teacher and really appreciate your teaching style. You make things so easy to understand. Thanks again for taking the time to make these videos for us. : )
oriongemini 3 years ago
I've just wished i was able to understand him,because of his strong accent.
spritics333 3 years ago
Yes! You can use the word "did" the work yesterday. The past participle would be the word "done." I had already "done" the work before 3:00 p.m yesterday.
soulsearch1234 3 years ago 2
Great Job!!!! but not for beginners
xopbat999 3 years ago 5
What about the word 'did'.
can you said i 'did' the work yesterday .
And what forms of the sentences does the word "did" applied?
leobt98765 4 years ago 4
Great job.
Thank you very much for your videos!!
mazzimi 4 years ago 3
good job..mr thoth
christeenjoane 4 years ago 2
well done mate!!
keep videos like these coming!!
iamjhou 4 years ago 2