I salute for the strong fighting spirit and the love of their country of the German people,death to the Jews who are the parasites of the Fatherland may the True sons and daughters of Germany shall awaken.
too bad the S.A have a conflict to the SS and the German military because of Rohm's ambitions of merging the S.A to the army.
The SA, were unedcated, brutal men, which was exactly the kind of men the party needed at this time.
The Plan of the second revolution (a social/communist one), Röhms crazy idea of forming the SA into an army- they would have led to disaster: which had been an inner collapse of the Reich. Churchills mind was made up- He would have led a war against germany, no matter who was in charge!
Stop spreading lies and dishonoring men like Himmler and praising Homosexual wrecks like Röhm.
If you praise the "SA-spirit" (which didn't really exist because the SA was just a useful tool for a certain time(not in a negative sense- without them there wold have been no 3rd Reich)) you praise those who "represented" it.
Hitler studied agricultural sience and was a brilliant student. He knew lots about occultism and culture and gathered great men like; Kiss, Wirth, Rahn, Willigut, Schäfer, etc. around him to discover and recreate a origin german culture.
and once again: the SS- a order like the templars; warrior-monks, was the bone structure of the Reich. The soul, the will and the elite of germany.
The SS was himmlers work, so I don't see how you can blame him for his "failure"-
He believed that Hitler was dead and wanted to save what possible. He didn't want power- he had a vision and was a very sensitive person (he, believing in karma, was sorry for anyone killed, but accepted it for his vision: a higher value for all.)
I do not have to praise every member and action of the SA, just as I do not praise every member and action of the Reich itself. In every movement there are unpleasant people and unjust actions.
You mean Himmler studied agronomy, not AH. I see no evidence of a brilliant mind, someone good at manipulating others.
Anyone could have made the same cultural ideals as him. His were not all flawless, either.
You are free to praise him, but please make your own video for this :)
Rudel, Rommel, Peiper, even AH - all men who were genuine soldiers and understood their crafts. Those Wehrmacht men were all brave honorable ones who represent the bravery and truth of Germany. HH was never a genuine soldier, never fought. I do not compare them.
HH created and formed the SS. As I said his talent was organisation. Goebbels wasn't a genuin fighter as well. But his speeches and Propaganda was of uttmost iportance to the 3rd Reich.
The SS existed before HH. He shaped it to his desires and many of those were not bad. I do not hate the SS, but I do not see it as the heart and soul of the Reich. He did not give birth, he joined an existing organization.
Goebbels did not pretend to be a warrior and strongman like some claim of HH.
BTW Goebbles wasn't afraid of fighting- in his book: the SA conqers Berlin, Wilfrid Bade describes from the eyes of the simple SA man, that "der Doktor", who they called him, eagerly led the SA-storm into a Hall filled with rotfront.
I strongly recommand you this book if you are interested in the SA
I know JG was regarded highly and even beloved by his SA-men in Berlin. This is no secret. Please do not act like you are my teacher - you have read many books, and this is laudable, but does not impress me.
He did not make himself to be a warrior, nor did his men. Others who were no more a warrior are somehow made into brave men.
The German is not a problem for me. I know of the NSL-Archiv, and have some films from there, the only place I have seen with this material. I will look there again soon.
Sturmabteilung was the true soul of Nationalsocialism. They was workers. I think the "left wing" of Nationalsocialism (Strasser brothers and Ernst Röhm with SA) is the true Nationalsocialism.
They were not communists. They were simply not as submissive to cowardly inherited wealth as some others. AH as well wished for an end to class barriers and the parasitic reality of capitalist international finance dominating Europe. The desires were far more similar than different.
Yes, there will never be an end to classes, and the SA did not work to change this.
A natural harmony - too bad some of his men (around HH) did not work for this by favoring some of the established wealthy. This was not harmony, this was cronyism and pseudocapitalism at work once again. A twotiered society of serfs and elites is not harmony.
Röhm and HH had mutual jealousy and a power struggle. The SA could not survive away from the party...but the party could not survive without SA.
I did not say this, I said some of the policies which were submissive to old money were no different from capitalist bullshit. To give the existing elite such unearned power is not harmony.
I know the reality of the work situation, it is as you say, in the 30s Germany was the most advanced place in the world. But not all were equal.
I see the problem in giving power and titles to those simply because of what they were born into.
The NS is not against hierarchy and discrimination in the nation- But the democratic system of hierarchy (money is power, honor is ingorated = jews in charge) is beeing replaced by a new one, based on merit and blood (character, effort, german/nordic phenotype).
The NS doesnt attack the old aristocracy in a bolschewist rage (they often are superior in charckter, spirit and phenotype)- they gave them the chance to proove to be still worth their status and other to gain that status by effort.
How was merit and blood implemented? The same old elite cowards were given titles and power they did not deserve. This is simple fact.
It was not about merit and blood, it was about old money and connections. Capitalist bullshit defined. NO "HARMONY"! It was the same old money = power.
The old aristocracy almost entirely did nothing to prove themselves. They never have, not then, not today as they lead us into a globalized hell for their own profit.
No, but less than in the democratic and monarchistic system.
While those System are rotten and against nature, the NS system is very close to perfection, in my eyes. The small gap between NS and perfection- is it this the basis for your critics?
Please tell me exactly: What promise, given to the workers was not fulfilled? everyone had a job, social and health insurance, the Kdf allowed the to go on vacancy... I don't see any "resistance against opression" among the german workers against the 3rd Reich. The only ones who opposed to the new system were: monarchists (Stauffenberg), jews and communists and I don't assume that you share their point of view.
As you once said, it was supposed to be a meritocracy, where people would receive success based on ability. This was not always the case, and some groups more than others worked in this.
Look - I believe most of the Reich was the best ideal. The social ideals and quality of life was the best in the world. But nothing is perfect.
I have read all your comments on your video and it's all true. You know your facts well and you can counter the idiotic left and zionistic bullshit very well.
I am Flemish and I share the same opinion as you have. I am a member of the N-SA (New-Solidaristic Movement) and we follow the ideology of the SA very closely.
The group of Himmler and similars were fanatics, blind racists and were based on hate more than anything. Those who came before were not like this, and NS was not supposed to be like this. There is such a difference between the idyllic time before the war, and what the fanatics made later.
I do not see any brilliant military strategy made by Himmler. He was simply a speaker and a figure to give blind deference. He was delusional - he expected the allied hordes to make him a leader. He was drunk on power.
I do not believe an adult can be "introduced" to this.
You are like Himmler in an obsession with gays. He must have been hiding something.
Those who protest so much are often hiding something. This is not pseudopsychology, only fact. If this displeases you, you are free to complain elsewhere. No more danger having a little chicken farmer in a key position.
Himmler was a speaker and manipulator with ambition. Too much of his were based on superstition and paranoia. He did not build the Reich.
The man who founded the "elite" was no "elite" himself - he would never have been able to be a member by his own criteria.
So? AH wasn't nordic either, what doesn't make him a lesser person..
Everyones position according to his talents- and Himmlers talent was organisation.
Look at the Wewelsburg or the Ordensburgen like Vogelsang. Look at the technic, the science, the cultral knwoledge the SS gathered and created in such a short time.
The anti-gay measures of the NSDAP started after the mess with Röhms gay-club infiltrating the SA.
It was a reaction to aproblem. The NS doesn't focus on gays. Himmler was interested in ancient history and the culture of the early germans and they threw gays into the swamps. This may explain Himmlers aversion against gays wich I share absolutely without beeing gay or hiding something.
Your rebuttal is a distraction and is exactly what we do not need to see any progress. There is nothing "Jewish" about it, nor can you provide examples of your conspiracy. In no way is someone like HH "perfect" or a beautful hardworking perfectionist. I make no support of the decline of society. We have more incommon than opposed. If you are looking for an enemy or a fight, go elsewhere.
In ancient times the masses also lived in dirt huts with a subsistence lifestyle while a few controlled everything. Is this something to emulate?
HH was a distracted little man who let his fixation stand in the way of greater issues.
Read this please: I am not here to argue about HH or be called names. If this is not suitable for you, please post elsewhere. I do not want to block you, but I lack the time and energy to continue this.
Everyone according to his talents? Then why were many inheritance elite old money types given SS titles while they did nothing to earn them?
The technology, science, and everything else in the Reich existed with or without the SS. These were German ideals, they existed before and they existed after. The SS was not the only group which can appreciate these traits.
You are seeking to fight, because someone does not care for HH. But you have no recourse here.
I never said the Reich was bad, I never said HH made anything fail, and I do not believe either Please do not use quotations when nothing of this sort was made. There were far worse people than HH, and he had nothing to do with the failure of the Reich.
I simply do not care for him, and I believe he is given too much credit.
You are obviously not aware how your words could look like to ohters.
In yor descr. you wrote: "the good Nazis" "true NS". Had this group remained dominant, history would have been much different" "Once the SA lost dominance, negative events became more common"
This is exactly the communists tactic. Creating the fiction of the "good nazis" who were replaced by the evil ones who absed NS and created negative events.
You now are inattackable with the Holocau$t-weapon, beacause you can distance yourself from this "bad things" a dominant SA wold have prevented. (just like commies do from stalinism)
That's of course a blatant lie. The "SA" (how do yo define that "group", just had was campaining- that's different from ruling a state. They had nor greater responisbilty.
You are right: the made everything possible. The Reich was born in the bloody streetfights against commies-
You are somehow obsessed with me, and I do not have the time. Please refrain from your victim mentality babble and baseless accusation and namecalling, or you will lose the ability to post anything here. Say one more thing of "communist" and such, and you are gone.
You are indeed looking to fight, and you will not be given this ability here.
Face it, your beloved HH did nothing to replace the same people who have made problems forever.
There were many SA men in fighting, but not anything of an entire unit of SA, not with official Wehrmacht name I should say. At the end there were probably entire groups of fighters who were in SA.
War with Germany was the nail in the coffin of England. Since England declared war, England has been dying more with each new day. One cannot visit England in 2008 and see proof they won anything in 1945. Their leaders have betrayed the people.
unfortunately the conspiracy to keep , germans behind in science and technology , has also largely succeded , otherwise how can one explain the lack od scientific progress/inventions , post 1945
28 million indians to be precise.And then these very people made us fight the wermacht, which we really perceived as friends , thats why a large section of indian troops defected and joined the indische ss .
The brit-american duo has made germany and germans feel a false sense of guilt,every country and empire commited excess .The germans compared to the anglosaxons oppressed the developing world the least.
I know of the mandmade famines created by British. This was genocide. The British have much genocide in their history.
Germany would never hurt India like the British.
Angloamerican ideals are destroying the western world. Their forced guilt and deflection is destructive. They are going to kill themselves and kill us along with them - unless the trends since 1945 are reversed.
And they left everywhere is mess, Palestine, India and Pakistan, South Africa, Rhodesia, Ireland to name a few. The British empire was as brutal as Hitlers but few will admit to it. In the end, the UK even sold out Poland. Did Chamberlain seek freedom for the Baltic republic states after 1939/40? No, he did not.
all y east germans retain old german values discipline , focus , sharpness , physical proficiency ! West germans on the other hand are a occupied state!
Just like England, the USA, and everyone else - all with insane leaders. Today the globalists do have the world in a yoke. This is the future Germany sought to prevent.
I feel sorry for the Germans too, THEY were those who started the war, so THEY are the ones who can be blamed for the death of their compatriots
and yes, you are right about what the Soviet Union did to Eastern Europe, but your video isn't about the Red Army as good guys, so this part of your reply is totally pointless
WW2 started with Versailles. If you hate WW2, talk to the stupid nations of France and England. You do not understand history, you have been taught by Zionist sympathy and postwar cowardice.
You lack the ability to hold the red lie to equal castigation, you do not have a right to tell me what is pointless.
Had Germany voted red instead of brown, your nation would be a desert today.
do you seriously think that if Hitler had won WW2 than the world would be a better place or what? "They fought for Germany, for Europe, for the west." Who? The Wehrmacht??? They fought for the madness of a psychopathic fool... Everyone feels sorry for them, for what happened with them at Stalingrad... Why did they had to go there??? And don't reply "because they had to fight their noble war against the soviets"...
Germany fought for the western world. The conquered party of 1945 was western civilization. The demographic disaster of Europe today is proof. Stalin would have moved westward in not much time...as Russia could do again...and they will slaughter your nation again if they do.
Germany would have sluaghtered us to... do you really think that Hitler would have stopped with the european countries?? after British and France would have been defeated, he would have taken time to regroup, and plan a massive attack against the western forces of Canada and US. he wasnt fighting for the western world, he was fighting to regain the losses suffered by Germany due to the Versailles Treaty, and he wasnt planning to stop after that
if all of europe had become in germanys power, she could have conscripted soldiers to fight, which would have made the 70 million total to much more impressive numbers. and with such a large land mass to conquer, germany could have invaded a good portion of the country virtuosly unnoticed. for example, the northern regions of canada were basically unpopulated. im sure that quite a few germans would have niticed this, and so continues the attack
Please provide a source for your baseless accusation or stop the spread of worthless allied propaganda. I ask you once and if you do not cease, you are banned. There was no German scheme to own the world. This is a lie spread by the liarvictors of 1945 to distract from their own crimes and robbery. You lack any evidence of your insane claim.
If you knew anything of war, you would know a vast land is the most difficult to conquer, for partisans and fights which last many years.
The 'holocaust' is no different from the harsh actions of any young empire.
The expansion of British, Soviets, Americans, and your Canadians is a story of genocide and horror.
Germany paid for all crimes many times over and many years ago. Nobody else has done so.
Versailles was the reason for WW2 and Germany was unfairly punished. France should never have influence in such affairs. France proves to all that it cannot manage itself, it does not deserve a say in others.
germany was too harshly punished by the versailles treaty, but that gives them no reason to try and exterminate a race that had no effect on the treaty. i will admitt, that the expansions of these empires did result in many deaths, but, for example, Canada is paying for those crimes to this day. and germanys genocide was much more serious. any of the expansions do not come close to the 6 million that germans killed in concentration camps.
Do you claim no Zionist influence in the unjust terms of Versailles? Do you know the name Baruch?
Canada pays for nothing. Your men were used and slaughtered by the British pigs in their misguided war.
Do you not know how many were killed in the British empire? Their manmade famine in the Deccan Plateau killed more than your "6 million" alone. The Soviet expansion killed far more. Nobody will ever know how many died in American expansion.
they were cruel, self-centered, and heartless in WWI
they put their own lives ahead of any other soldiers, and even resulted in the killing of their own men on many occasions
i know that have done wrong, and will probably still continue doing wrong.
but Canada was fought a less severe war, and they are paying reparations to the familes of those killed in their expansion. and i never said that their crimes were still justified
The British have done more wrong than Germany, yet they do not pay. Perhaps their slow death of today is this penance.
Your Canadian boys died in WW1 and WW2 for what? Not for Canada, but for England and USA. And now look at the world they make.
Canada simply gives welfare money to those with the heritage stolen. This is not a true reparation. No other nation has ever paid as much as Germany. And today these other nations create the death of western civiliation.
like this, they can't help. Where I used To work I had gay friends, (nothing physical). which again I stood up for.When the spanish started calling him of maricon, and pendejo.
The SA were a brilliant organisation. Ernst Rohm, the leader, was a very clever man and if he hadn't been assasinated in The Night Of The Long Knives, then the SA would have become very powerful. I have read that apparently Rohm wanted the SA to become the new army. And i beleive that they could have been.
At one point the SA reached a powerful 4.3 million men, and like i said if Rohm hadn't been assasinated then they would have had a chance to become the new Reichswer. But they did lack discipline as u said, and like u said they were brilliant.
No the actually event was rohm demanded Hitlers cabinet to amalgamate the SA and the regular army but under Versailles the regular army was very small in comparison to the SA which was 4 million strong Hitler would have never agreed to rohms demands it would have left the SA dominant in the army and rohm with to much power it was very important factor in Hitlers reasoning for the sas removal
. In the spirit of national independence, European kinship and mutual interest, EUROPE MUST UNITE TO CREATE A NATION GREATER THAN ANY SEEN ON THIS WORLD! WE WILL CRUSH ALL THOSE WHO OPPOSE OUR GOALS AND WHO STAND AGAINST US, WE WILL SHOW THOSE WHO MOCK AND SCORN US WHAT IT MEANS TO STAND AGAINST THE GREATEST PEOPLES ON EARTH!!!!!!!!! LONG LIVE EUROPE!
During the first part of the 20th century the great nations of Europe were victims of annihilation. The same soil that was home to the greatest men in history is now a mere frontier of culturally alien societies and Governments. We have become standardised by American Liberal Capitalism. Our cultural mindset has been weakened; our once great empires are in tatters. The outer forces have become victors of exploitation.
Standardised, this is the EU. It is a USSR for the west, it destroys identity and pride. And we all know who supports this the most.
If the Zionists deserve a homeland (and I do not say they do not deserve this), so do we. Europe is our homeland, not a ground for Israelis to seek influence by destruction via immigration.
Who won WW2? Communists and Zionists.
Europe is the home to the most progress and invention. Europe must live. If it is subjugated to the new order, it will be dark ages.
hmmmm....I am personally not a fan of the SA, i can however see ow the SA and Fascism on the whole is appealing, i myself have sympathised with many of Fascisms teachings, yet would not back it, i love democracy, true it has its failings but on the whole i prefer it to the 'harsh' rule of Fascism, but in saying that i do feel that democracy in Britian has become 'soft' towards criminals etc and a certain 'strengthening' of government is required, but not to the level of Nazi Germany.
England needs a revolution and a destruction of those who have power today. You must reject the Rothschild-owned structure and those who makes you an American state.
Democracy there is not soft towards simple criminals - it defers to Islamic lunatics and Zionist lies. England now upholds Sharia law, and is losing identity and value. Did your soldiers die for this? The did not fight for Englandistan.
I agree with what your saying (please refer to my nation as Britain and not england) The Subjection of the European peoples cannot continue. Europe must fight for its spiritual and physical survival. The peoples of Europe must put aside their petty nationalism. We must be united by a common cause. The European people must find the will within themselves to reject multiculturalism and materialism. They must forge a future for themselves and their children.
The multicultural materialist ideal is the work of Zionists, they know this destroys national identity and value. This is towards their new world order, one government and a two tier society of serf and elite. They have owned England for 200 years. Your people must reject them.
I agree Europe must unite,we should forget the mistakes of the past,knowing that if one of us dies, we all die.
We were fooled to fight each other while the true enemy was elsewhere.
I was wondering what everyone thinks of the NAZI euthanasia program (for retards). Personally I think it was great, retarded people really serve no purpose and are an embarrasement.
Interesting that the SA had, in my opinion, better songs than the SS. This together with the Horst Wessel Lied and Volk ans Gewehr are some of the very best. Also the HJ was part of the SA until 1936 (I think) and they had great songs too.
If Hitler saw the natzis today he would cry.... seeing what they have been reduced to... pericing and perverted twisted punks.... he liked it Military style and perfection.. not the swabble they are today.
sturmabteilung was fail of NSDAP :D
Eliq09 2 weeks ago
Tough!
Vielen Dank für herrliche Musik und Fotografie.
akaospirits 8 months ago in playlist 軍歌・行進曲・戦時歌
I salute for the strong fighting spirit and the love of their country of the German people,death to the Jews who are the parasites of the Fatherland may the True sons and daughters of Germany shall awaken.
too bad the S.A have a conflict to the SS and the German military because of Rohm's ambitions of merging the S.A to the army.
anyway Seig Heil.
Romanow1992 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Deutschland erwache! Sieg Heil.
Europa erwache! die Reds sind vor der Haustür
yurgen780 1 year ago
Artur, This video to be your second work is excellent!
Nikita35791 1 year ago
luv to have that ring at 1:23, hitler teh bastard sohuld ahve never betrayed teh SA
angrygunsmith 1 year ago
Every picture and poster is nice.
I do love the Shield and Armor on 2:22
panzermadame 2 years ago
The SA, were unedcated, brutal men, which was exactly the kind of men the party needed at this time.
The Plan of the second revolution (a social/communist one), Röhms crazy idea of forming the SA into an army- they would have led to disaster: which had been an inner collapse of the Reich. Churchills mind was made up- He would have led a war against germany, no matter who was in charge!
Stop spreading lies and dishonoring men like Himmler and praising Homosexual wrecks like Röhm.
DWDBL 2 years ago
Where is praise to Röhm?
You are correct of Churchill.
How did Himmler have any education or honor in his life? He was a brutal thug in a nice uniform.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
If you praise the "SA-spirit" (which didn't really exist because the SA was just a useful tool for a certain time(not in a negative sense- without them there wold have been no 3rd Reich)) you praise those who "represented" it.
Hitler studied agricultural sience and was a brilliant student. He knew lots about occultism and culture and gathered great men like; Kiss, Wirth, Rahn, Willigut, Schäfer, etc. around him to discover and recreate a origin german culture.
DWDBL 2 years ago
and once again: the SS- a order like the templars; warrior-monks, was the bone structure of the Reich. The soul, the will and the elite of germany.
The SS was himmlers work, so I don't see how you can blame him for his "failure"-
He believed that Hitler was dead and wanted to save what possible. He didn't want power- he had a vision and was a very sensitive person (he, believing in karma, was sorry for anyone killed, but accepted it for his vision: a higher value for all.)
DWDBL 2 years ago
He failed by his own doing. He was drunk with power and did not have the answers he claimed.
All he wished to save was his own life and status.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
I do not have to praise every member and action of the SA, just as I do not praise every member and action of the Reich itself. In every movement there are unpleasant people and unjust actions.
You mean Himmler studied agronomy, not AH. I see no evidence of a brilliant mind, someone good at manipulating others.
Anyone could have made the same cultural ideals as him. His were not all flawless, either.
You are free to praise him, but please make your own video for this :)
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
However the fact: Himmler built the SS
Cant just be replied by: "anyone cold have done that"-
So anyone could have done what Rudel, Rommel, Peiper and even AH did as well?
DWDBL 2 years ago
Himmler joined into the SS and was given power.
Rudel, Rommel, Peiper, even AH - all men who were genuine soldiers and understood their crafts. Those Wehrmacht men were all brave honorable ones who represent the bravery and truth of Germany. HH was never a genuine soldier, never fought. I do not compare them.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
HH created and formed the SS. As I said his talent was organisation. Goebbels wasn't a genuin fighter as well. But his speeches and Propaganda was of uttmost iportance to the 3rd Reich.
DWDBL 2 years ago
The SS existed before HH. He shaped it to his desires and many of those were not bad. I do not hate the SS, but I do not see it as the heart and soul of the Reich. He did not give birth, he joined an existing organization.
Goebbels did not pretend to be a warrior and strongman like some claim of HH.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
BTW Goebbles wasn't afraid of fighting- in his book: the SA conqers Berlin, Wilfrid Bade describes from the eyes of the simple SA man, that "der Doktor", who they called him, eagerly led the SA-storm into a Hall filled with rotfront.
I strongly recommand you this book if you are interested in the SA
DWDBL 2 years ago
I know JG was regarded highly and even beloved by his SA-men in Berlin. This is no secret. Please do not act like you are my teacher - you have read many books, and this is laudable, but does not impress me.
He did not make himself to be a warrior, nor did his men. Others who were no more a warrior are somehow made into brave men.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
I didn't want to act like a teacher- the book is great and You'll love it!
DWDBL 2 years ago
I believe you and I will seek this book. I do not deny you are smart.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
I don't know if theres an english version.
the german one can be found on the nsl-archive (google it), where you can find any speech and film of the 3rd Reich as well.
DWDBL 2 years ago
The German is not a problem for me. I know of the NSL-Archiv, and have some films from there, the only place I have seen with this material. I will look there again soon.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
yes its huge, nevertheless the guys from unglaublichkeiten seem to be a bit obsessed by the sothpole and the hollow earth ;)
DWDBL 2 years ago
Yes, I know of their interests, as you have seen by my location in profile here :)
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Sturmabteilung was the true soul of Nationalsocialism. They was workers. I think the "left wing" of Nationalsocialism (Strasser brothers and Ernst Röhm with SA) is the true Nationalsocialism.
P.s.: Sorry for my bad english
RivoluzioneFascista 2 years ago
You are correct regarding true NS
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
No it isn't they were nationalcommunists and traitors!
Strasser had a deal with the opposition, röhm with england, for revolting against adolf Hitler.
DWDBL 2 years ago
The Strassers and Röhm were communists? Please.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Yes national communists- They wanted a social revolution to take place-the SA should replace the Rotfront an eliminate all classes in Germany-
Instead Hitler watend to combine workers and intelligence in an organic system.
That's it!
DWDBL 2 years ago
They were not communists. They were simply not as submissive to cowardly inherited wealth as some others. AH as well wished for an end to class barriers and the parasitic reality of capitalist international finance dominating Europe. The desires were far more similar than different.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Yes a end to class barriers but not to classes!!
Do you get it?
Com. wants only one class- the workers class- to rule (wich in fact is a propagada lie of course)
AH wanted to bring the classes back in their natural harmony - a real hirarchy in which you are juged by effort and not your name.
Röhm was infected by communist thoughts.
He wanted to seperate the SA from the NSDAP, to remain powerful.
DWDBL 2 years ago
Yes, there will never be an end to classes, and the SA did not work to change this.
A natural harmony - too bad some of his men (around HH) did not work for this by favoring some of the established wealthy. This was not harmony, this was cronyism and pseudocapitalism at work once again. A twotiered society of serfs and elites is not harmony.
Röhm and HH had mutual jealousy and a power struggle. The SA could not survive away from the party...but the party could not survive without SA.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
The 3rd Reich- a capitalist, state who opressed the workers??
This was the communist propaganda.
However the reality beats this lie- the german workers were happy, well fed and had the best overall life conditions of the world..
Where do you see the problem??
DWDBL 2 years ago
I did not say this, I said some of the policies which were submissive to old money were no different from capitalist bullshit. To give the existing elite such unearned power is not harmony.
I know the reality of the work situation, it is as you say, in the 30s Germany was the most advanced place in the world. But not all were equal.
I see the problem in giving power and titles to those simply because of what they were born into.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
You exactly said that: "twotiered society of serfs and elites" "cronyism and pseudocapitalism at work once again
twotired society referrs to the state itself.
The old aristocracy was replaced by a aristocracy of merit and blood. (meritocraty)
Of course- the old aristocracy could remain in their (financially and politically) powerful position if they cooperated, and many did.
I don't want to insult you but I feel as if you didn't understand NS overall:
DWDBL 2 years ago
The NS is not against hierarchy and discrimination in the nation- But the democratic system of hierarchy (money is power, honor is ingorated = jews in charge) is beeing replaced by a new one, based on merit and blood (character, effort, german/nordic phenotype).
The NS doesnt attack the old aristocracy in a bolschewist rage (they often are superior in charckter, spirit and phenotype)- they gave them the chance to proove to be still worth their status and other to gain that status by effort.
DWDBL 2 years ago
How was merit and blood implemented? The same old elite cowards were given titles and power they did not deserve. This is simple fact.
It was not about merit and blood, it was about old money and connections. Capitalist bullshit defined. NO "HARMONY"! It was the same old money = power.
The old aristocracy almost entirely did nothing to prove themselves. They never have, not then, not today as they lead us into a globalized hell for their own profit.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Society is not the state. Society is much more complex than this. The state as it became did nothing to replace a twotiered society.
The old aristocracy was not replaced at all. They were appeased and coddled, given power and title they did not deserve.
This is not harmony and merit, it is the same old shit that causes problems in the past and makes problems today.
You can feel as you please, it makes nothing true. You told me you made your case, but here you are again.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
because you rose arguments i couldn't let undisputed- please give some example for that "fact".
DWDBL 2 years ago
What would you like? Do you deny many were given position and title simply based on name and money?
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
No, but less than in the democratic and monarchistic system.
While those System are rotten and against nature, the NS system is very close to perfection, in my eyes. The small gap between NS and perfection- is it this the basis for your critics?
DWDBL 2 years ago
My criticism comes from what was promised or implied vs what was delivered. Sadly, the gap was not small.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Please tell me exactly: What promise, given to the workers was not fulfilled? everyone had a job, social and health insurance, the Kdf allowed the to go on vacancy... I don't see any "resistance against opression" among the german workers against the 3rd Reich. The only ones who opposed to the new system were: monarchists (Stauffenberg), jews and communists and I don't assume that you share their point of view.
DWDBL 2 years ago
As you once said, it was supposed to be a meritocracy, where people would receive success based on ability. This was not always the case, and some groups more than others worked in this.
Look - I believe most of the Reich was the best ideal. The social ideals and quality of life was the best in the world. But nothing is perfect.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
5***** video
I love that little fellow saluting on 0:53.
panzermadame 2 years ago
ArturAxmann, I must say I respect you.
I have read all your comments on your video and it's all true. You know your facts well and you can counter the idiotic left and zionistic bullshit very well.
I am Flemish and I share the same opinion as you have. I am a member of the N-SA (New-Solidaristic Movement) and we follow the ideology of the SA very closely.
May the final empire rise soon.
Ehre und Treue, Freund.
FlandersIndependant 2 years ago
Thank you for the kind words.
Europe must rise again, we are not dead yet - you prove this.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Why do you say "Once the SA lost dominance, negative events became more common. SA = good guys"?
What are the ideological diferences between SA, Rohm,Lutze and Hitler,Himmler,Goebbels?
Thanks for the info.
TreueumTreueFest62 2 years ago
The group of Himmler and similars were fanatics, blind racists and were based on hate more than anything. Those who came before were not like this, and NS was not supposed to be like this. There is such a difference between the idyllic time before the war, and what the fanatics made later.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
You couldn't seperate Hitler from his SA back in the 1930thies, it wont work today.
Röhm built up a gay-network in the SA and introduced, SA-men into homosexuality!
The war wasn't caused by Himmler or his fellows. Without the SS, Himmler created Germany wouldn't have survived one week of the war.
DWDBL 2 years ago
I do not see any brilliant military strategy made by Himmler. He was simply a speaker and a figure to give blind deference. He was delusional - he expected the allied hordes to make him a leader. He was drunk on power.
I do not believe an adult can be "introduced" to this.
You are like Himmler in an obsession with gays. He must have been hiding something.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Please spare me yor freudian "psychology"-nonsense!!
Himmler wasn't obsessed with gays. He justed didn't want them in ruling positions, do you?
He and Hitler didn't want the SA to be dishonored as a "Gay-men-club"
Himmler a "simple speaker"????
Do you know anything abot the 3rd Reich? Without Himmler no SS, without SS no 3rd Reich.
The man who founded the elite of an elite-people dellusional????
omg
DWDBL 2 years ago
Those who protest so much are often hiding something. This is not pseudopsychology, only fact. If this displeases you, you are free to complain elsewhere. No more danger having a little chicken farmer in a key position.
Himmler was a speaker and manipulator with ambition. Too much of his were based on superstition and paranoia. He did not build the Reich.
The man who founded the "elite" was no "elite" himself - he would never have been able to be a member by his own criteria.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
So? AH wasn't nordic either, what doesn't make him a lesser person..
Everyones position according to his talents- and Himmlers talent was organisation.
Look at the Wewelsburg or the Ordensburgen like Vogelsang. Look at the technic, the science, the cultral knwoledge the SS gathered and created in such a short time.
DWDBL 2 years ago
The anti-gay measures of the NSDAP started after the mess with Röhms gay-club infiltrating the SA.
It was a reaction to aproblem. The NS doesn't focus on gays. Himmler was interested in ancient history and the culture of the early germans and they threw gays into the swamps. This may explain Himmlers aversion against gays wich I share absolutely without beeing gay or hiding something.
DWDBL 2 years ago
Your agrument is a typical jewish inversion of meanings, used by almost any hollywood film.
The ugly, funny, neurotic one is the hero - the beautiful (mostly blond), hard working, perfectionists are the real villains.-
A perfect familiy "must" hide something. The neurotic, torn family is normal.
Someone who engages against something bad, has to "hide" something.
That's sick thinking my friend! It Destroys your moral.
DWDBL 2 years ago
Your rebuttal is a distraction and is exactly what we do not need to see any progress. There is nothing "Jewish" about it, nor can you provide examples of your conspiracy. In no way is someone like HH "perfect" or a beautful hardworking perfectionist. I make no support of the decline of society. We have more incommon than opposed. If you are looking for an enemy or a fight, go elsewhere.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
In ancient times the masses also lived in dirt huts with a subsistence lifestyle while a few controlled everything. Is this something to emulate?
HH was a distracted little man who let his fixation stand in the way of greater issues.
Read this please: I am not here to argue about HH or be called names. If this is not suitable for you, please post elsewhere. I do not want to block you, but I lack the time and energy to continue this.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Everyone according to his talents? Then why were many inheritance elite old money types given SS titles while they did nothing to earn them?
The technology, science, and everything else in the Reich existed with or without the SS. These were German ideals, they existed before and they existed after. The SS was not the only group which can appreciate these traits.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
I'm not looking for a fight.
I just can't rest quiet when someone thinks he's in the position to judge people like HH, or even disrespect their work.
I assume that your real intention is, to compromise with the lies of today:
"the 3rd Reich was bad, but ONLY because of Himmler and his kind" "the ideal was great but men like Himmler made it fail"
Thats the same foul tactic, communists use to differ "stalinism" from communism. This are lies and recreancy. I made my point
DWDBL 2 years ago
You are seeking to fight, because someone does not care for HH. But you have no recourse here.
I never said the Reich was bad, I never said HH made anything fail, and I do not believe either Please do not use quotations when nothing of this sort was made. There were far worse people than HH, and he had nothing to do with the failure of the Reich.
I simply do not care for him, and I believe he is given too much credit.
No lies, nothing recreated.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
You are obviously not aware how your words could look like to ohters.
In yor descr. you wrote: "the good Nazis" "true NS". Had this group remained dominant, history would have been much different" "Once the SA lost dominance, negative events became more common"
This is exactly the communists tactic. Creating the fiction of the "good nazis" who were replaced by the evil ones who absed NS and created negative events.
DWDBL 2 years ago
You now are inattackable with the Holocau$t-weapon, beacause you can distance yourself from this "bad things" a dominant SA wold have prevented. (just like commies do from stalinism)
That's of course a blatant lie. The "SA" (how do yo define that "group", just had was campaining- that's different from ruling a state. They had nor greater responisbilty.
You are right: the made everything possible. The Reich was born in the bloody streetfights against commies-
DWDBL 2 years ago
But why to you divide the movement into : "the True ones; SA", the bad aristocratic, capitalistic ones who comitted the "bad events".
The SA had a completly different job in a conpletly differen phase- they conqered the political power.
But of course they were unable to rule a state and they didn't want to! They were simple man who completly trusted AH!
Why do you create a fictional boundary here???
I'm not looking for a fight but this is the first time I read somthing like that and its untrue!
DWDBL 2 years ago
You are somehow obsessed with me, and I do not have the time. Please refrain from your victim mentality babble and baseless accusation and namecalling, or you will lose the ability to post anything here. Say one more thing of "communist" and such, and you are gone.
You are indeed looking to fight, and you will not be given this ability here.
Face it, your beloved HH did nothing to replace the same people who have made problems forever.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Some in the movement were not the same as others.
Why do you have a problem with some people being distanced from the actions of others? This is no fiction, this is the facts.
I would trust AH before I would trust HH.
You are indeed looking for a fight, you will not have it as I will not allow it. If you wish for this, make it at your own video.
The same old money and connections retained power and made nothing positive.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
The SA were true and good moreso than most of those who came to power later, the profiteers and chickenhawks.
It is no fiction. There were indeed evil ones who abused their power and created misery. This was more common as time moved on.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus
DWDBL 2 years ago
And today, we have no justice while at the same time the world does perish.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Als die goldne Abendsonne
Sandte ihren letzten Schein,
Zog ein Regiment von Hitler
In ein kleines Städtchen ein.
kekuu7 2 years ago
What is the name of this song? Braunen Soldaten, I presume?
GMinGREEN 2 years ago
yes, ''Wir sind die Braunen Soldaten'
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
Thank you.
GMinGREEN 2 years ago
i just called a taylor to make an sa repro kepi,this guy has made lots of things like these i bet its going to be cool
fuckmyassgirl 2 years ago
Das SS Uniform war schoner
NancyBos1101 2 years ago
who was the leader of the SA?i can't remember his name
emberzombi17 2 years ago
There were a few, most notable were Röhm and Lutze.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
nice feldjaegerkorps grouping.
ssostufveatch 2 years ago
hail deutchland!
petrauskasss 2 years ago
S.A., Voran:-)
massibest83 2 years ago
skvela hudba aj ked su to iba nacisti.
ondro84gmail 2 years ago
There were many SA men in fighting, but not anything of an entire unit of SA, not with official Wehrmacht name I should say. At the end there were probably entire groups of fighters who were in SA.
ArturAxmann 2 years ago
That's a cute picture on 0:53 the little fellow saluting, with the hat on .
panzermadame 2 years ago
Without the german bombardment britian would have never widthdrawn from Asia , India , and the mid east!
heartburn84 3 years ago 3
War with Germany was the nail in the coffin of England. Since England declared war, England has been dying more with each new day. One cannot visit England in 2008 and see proof they won anything in 1945. Their leaders have betrayed the people.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Heil Hitler! Great videos Axmann. Where are you from?
chelloveck84 3 years ago
Neuschwabenland :)
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
unfortunately the conspiracy to keep , germans behind in science and technology , has also largely succeded , otherwise how can one explain the lack od scientific progress/inventions , post 1945
Germans invented:
Rocketry
antibiotics
the best field artillery
chain reaction
supersonic aircrafts
concept of burst weapons(sturmgewehr44)
the list goes on !!!!!
heartburn84 3 years ago
Germany still makes great technology, but does not advance as in the years before or during WW2, no doubt.
If one likes jet engines, rockets, modern medicine, nanotechnology, the best driving cars, and more, they must give credit to Germany.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
You left out creditcards...
The chip in those are the same technology used in the v2 rockets.
Of course further developed, but still.
ArildNL79 2 years ago
28 million indians to be precise.And then these very people made us fight the wermacht, which we really perceived as friends , thats why a large section of indian troops defected and joined the indische ss .
The brit-american duo has made germany and germans feel a false sense of guilt,every country and empire commited excess .The germans compared to the anglosaxons oppressed the developing world the least.
heartburn84 3 years ago
I know of the mandmade famines created by British. This was genocide. The British have much genocide in their history.
Germany would never hurt India like the British.
Angloamerican ideals are destroying the western world. Their forced guilt and deflection is destructive. They are going to kill themselves and kill us along with them - unless the trends since 1945 are reversed.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Artur the brit empire killed 28 million people , so they were actually much worse than the so called evil germans!
heartburn84 3 years ago
I believe this, they killed more than Germany in India alone, yes?
Their comeuppance will exist.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
And they left everywhere is mess, Palestine, India and Pakistan, South Africa, Rhodesia, Ireland to name a few. The British empire was as brutal as Hitlers but few will admit to it. In the end, the UK even sold out Poland. Did Chamberlain seek freedom for the Baltic republic states after 1939/40? No, he did not.
taywil64 3 years ago 2
5***** from America
panzermadame 3 years ago
all y east germans retain old german values discipline , focus , sharpness , physical proficiency ! West germans on the other hand are a occupied state!
heartburn84 3 years ago
The only old germans remain in East germany ! West germany , unfortunately has faced cultural genocide!
heartburn84 3 years ago
This was somewhat true 20 years to the past, but the time since with materialism and such has not helped.
All of Europe today has cultural genocide, thanks to angloamerican idiocy and their embrace of globalization and multiculti.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
it sucks what germans have become today though, their nothing like this anymore, no longer srtong,proud,or have that huge fighting sprit. sad really
udonthavthisname 3 years ago 5
This is true.
The western world has lost the will to fight. See what it brings, insane immigration and globalization. These are cancers.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Sehr schöne Bilder und Musik!
5*****
SSmann88 3 years ago
This could be true, a strong Germany scares them, no matter who has control.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
That's a very interesting picture on 2:22
the deference of 700 years. I wish I could read the top.
panzermadame 3 years ago 5
The top words are "Das Tausendjährige Gera" - Gera is a city and this was for the 700 anniversary, saying it will be to 1000 years.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Der SA Mann
ist stark in der Liebe
und stark im Hass.
alphamann198 3 years ago 14
Nice pictures good music ThankYou
panzermadame 3 years ago 5
i have no friends in youtube so i'm not trying impress anyone here, i'd be gladto be shown what you think are the facts
epagneul87 3 years ago
Because they were leaded by a megalomaniac, who wanted to yoke the entire world (just like the USSR, I give you that)
21esszoba 3 years ago
Just like England, the USA, and everyone else - all with insane leaders. Today the globalists do have the world in a yoke. This is the future Germany sought to prevent.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
tell this to the relatives of the 6 million jews who were killed by the nazis
21esszoba 3 years ago
That is an interesting claim.
I will do so after someone builds monuments and memorials to the 2+ million Germans who died AFTER the war.
You should be crying about the Soviet hordes who raped and pillaged your country for nearly 50 years thanks to British and American idiocy.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
I feel sorry for the Germans too, THEY were those who started the war, so THEY are the ones who can be blamed for the death of their compatriots
and yes, you are right about what the Soviet Union did to Eastern Europe, but your video isn't about the Red Army as good guys, so this part of your reply is totally pointless
21esszoba 3 years ago
WW2 started with Versailles. If you hate WW2, talk to the stupid nations of France and England. You do not understand history, you have been taught by Zionist sympathy and postwar cowardice.
You lack the ability to hold the red lie to equal castigation, you do not have a right to tell me what is pointless.
Had Germany voted red instead of brown, your nation would be a desert today.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
and Germany as well...
do you seriously think that if Hitler had won WW2 than the world would be a better place or what? "They fought for Germany, for Europe, for the west." Who? The Wehrmacht??? They fought for the madness of a psychopathic fool... Everyone feels sorry for them, for what happened with them at Stalingrad... Why did they had to go there??? And don't reply "because they had to fight their noble war against the soviets"...
21esszoba 3 years ago
Nothing is worse than communism. Nothing.
Germany fought for the western world. The conquered party of 1945 was western civilization. The demographic disaster of Europe today is proof. Stalin would have moved westward in not much time...as Russia could do again...and they will slaughter your nation again if they do.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Germany would have sluaghtered us to... do you really think that Hitler would have stopped with the european countries?? after British and France would have been defeated, he would have taken time to regroup, and plan a massive attack against the western forces of Canada and US. he wasnt fighting for the western world, he was fighting to regain the losses suffered by Germany due to the Versailles Treaty, and he wasnt planning to stop after that
romanoman9 3 years ago
Sorry, I do not believe this nor do I see evidence of such a claim.
Germany wished for a pan-European empire, nothing more.
This is what England feared, loss of continental influence. In this, England lost all power as it has none today.
A Germany of 70 millions could not conquer a vast North America of ca. 175 millions (at ca. 1940). This was not a goal.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
if all of europe had become in germanys power, she could have conscripted soldiers to fight, which would have made the 70 million total to much more impressive numbers. and with such a large land mass to conquer, germany could have invaded a good portion of the country virtuosly unnoticed. for example, the northern regions of canada were basically unpopulated. im sure that quite a few germans would have niticed this, and so continues the attack
romanoman9 3 years ago
Please provide a source for your baseless accusation or stop the spread of worthless allied propaganda. I ask you once and if you do not cease, you are banned. There was no German scheme to own the world. This is a lie spread by the liarvictors of 1945 to distract from their own crimes and robbery. You lack any evidence of your insane claim.
If you knew anything of war, you would know a vast land is the most difficult to conquer, for partisans and fights which last many years.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Absolutely agree. Hitler didn't even want war with England and took pains to avoid it.
freiherrudet 3 years ago
your actually right...
i have to write a essay on how versailles lead to the war
germany was kina dragged into the war because of their alliance with Serbia
but that still doesnt justify them for the lives they took during the holocaust.
no matter how hard you try, you wont defend them against that
romanoman9 3 years ago
The 'holocaust' is no different from the harsh actions of any young empire.
The expansion of British, Soviets, Americans, and your Canadians is a story of genocide and horror.
Germany paid for all crimes many times over and many years ago. Nobody else has done so.
Versailles was the reason for WW2 and Germany was unfairly punished. France should never have influence in such affairs. France proves to all that it cannot manage itself, it does not deserve a say in others.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
its true
germany was too harshly punished by the versailles treaty, but that gives them no reason to try and exterminate a race that had no effect on the treaty. i will admitt, that the expansions of these empires did result in many deaths, but, for example, Canada is paying for those crimes to this day. and germanys genocide was much more serious. any of the expansions do not come close to the 6 million that germans killed in concentration camps.
romanoman9 3 years ago
Do you claim no Zionist influence in the unjust terms of Versailles? Do you know the name Baruch?
Canada pays for nothing. Your men were used and slaughtered by the British pigs in their misguided war.
Do you not know how many were killed in the British empire? Their manmade famine in the Deccan Plateau killed more than your "6 million" alone. The Soviet expansion killed far more. Nobody will ever know how many died in American expansion.
Please do not lecture me, I know more.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
i do not defend the British
i know they have done plenty wrong
they were cruel, self-centered, and heartless in WWI
they put their own lives ahead of any other soldiers, and even resulted in the killing of their own men on many occasions
i know that have done wrong, and will probably still continue doing wrong.
but Canada was fought a less severe war, and they are paying reparations to the familes of those killed in their expansion. and i never said that their crimes were still justified
romanoman9 3 years ago
The British have done more wrong than Germany, yet they do not pay. Perhaps their slow death of today is this penance.
Your Canadian boys died in WW1 and WW2 for what? Not for Canada, but for England and USA. And now look at the world they make.
Canada simply gives welfare money to those with the heritage stolen. This is not a true reparation. No other nation has ever paid as much as Germany. And today these other nations create the death of western civiliation.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
11 million died in contration camps, 6 million jews and 5 million other people
this only the contration camp death toll, we're not counting the civillians that died in bombing or from famine
epagneul87 3 years ago
Your numbers are insane. Prove them or shut up.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
search for holocaust in wikipedia
the numbers are there, and also in any encyclopedia or school cursus you'll find
epagneul87 3 years ago
Wikipedia is not a credible source, most research of these numbers is incestuous.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
SA good guys??? please... they were nazis and as far as i know the nazis can be hardly called "good guys"...
21esszoba 3 years ago
As far as you know is not very far...
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
ARTUR. Please tell me. On 0:43 the soldier
has a half moon metal award on his neck. It signifies what?
panzermadame 3 years ago
This is called a 'gorget', it was used on many uniforms during the Reich, as an accessory and to signify one is on duty. It is a traditional item.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Why perverts?
I don't think they were perverts. They just had their own ways.
panzermadame 3 years ago
This is simply an insult from the immature because Röhm was gay.
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Realy so what. Being gay a person is born
like this, they can't help. Where I used To work I had gay friends, (nothing physical). which again I stood up for.When the spanish started calling him of maricon, and pendejo.
They are the nices person to work with.
Right of way I do speak 80% spanish.
panzermadame 3 years ago
The SS is way better than the SA. The SA was a "perverts playground" that didn't always follow Hitler's orders.
chelloveck84 3 years ago
But it is Hitler who lost the war
lulutotom718 3 years ago
Denn wir sind die braunen Soldaten,
Für Adolf Hitler ziehn wir ins Gefecht.
Denn wir sind die braunen Soldaten,
Und wir kämpfen für Freiheit und für Recht.
SA Voran!
10converse10 3 years ago 2
The SA were a brilliant organisation. Ernst Rohm, the leader, was a very clever man and if he hadn't been assasinated in The Night Of The Long Knives, then the SA would have become very powerful. I have read that apparently Rohm wanted the SA to become the new army. And i beleive that they could have been.
shaneomac911 3 years ago
Doubtful, SA lacked the discipline I believe.
Yet they did very much for the Reich and they were truly brilliant.
mrSwedenakapalm2 3 years ago
At one point the SA reached a powerful 4.3 million men, and like i said if Rohm hadn't been assasinated then they would have had a chance to become the new Reichswer. But they did lack discipline as u said, and like u said they were brilliant.
shaneomac911 3 years ago
No the actually event was rohm demanded Hitlers cabinet to amalgamate the SA and the regular army but under Versailles the regular army was very small in comparison to the SA which was 4 million strong Hitler would have never agreed to rohms demands it would have left the SA dominant in the army and rohm with to much power it was very important factor in Hitlers reasoning for the sas removal
aldunamesaretaken 3 years ago
SA Voran!
ArturAxmann 3 years ago
Der Führer ruft SA,
SA voran
Den Feind zu schlagen,
Mann für Mann.
Sieg für Das Vaterland!
AugustDittmann 3 years ago
. In the spirit of national independence, European kinship and mutual interest, EUROPE MUST UNITE TO CREATE A NATION GREATER THAN ANY SEEN ON THIS WORLD! WE WILL CRUSH ALL THOSE WHO OPPOSE OUR GOALS AND WHO STAND AGAINST US, WE WILL SHOW THOSE WHO MOCK AND SCORN US WHAT IT MEANS TO STAND AGAINST THE GREATEST PEOPLES ON EARTH!!!!!!!!! LONG LIVE EUROPE!
Calum169 4 years ago
During the first part of the 20th century the great nations of Europe were victims of annihilation. The same soil that was home to the greatest men in history is now a mere frontier of culturally alien societies and Governments. We have become standardised by American Liberal Capitalism. Our cultural mindset has been weakened; our once great empires are in tatters. The outer forces have become victors of exploitation.
Calum169 4 years ago
Standardised, this is the EU. It is a USSR for the west, it destroys identity and pride. And we all know who supports this the most.
If the Zionists deserve a homeland (and I do not say they do not deserve this), so do we. Europe is our homeland, not a ground for Israelis to seek influence by destruction via immigration.
Who won WW2? Communists and Zionists.
Europe is the home to the most progress and invention. Europe must live. If it is subjugated to the new order, it will be dark ages.
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
hmmmm....I am personally not a fan of the SA, i can however see ow the SA and Fascism on the whole is appealing, i myself have sympathised with many of Fascisms teachings, yet would not back it, i love democracy, true it has its failings but on the whole i prefer it to the 'harsh' rule of Fascism, but in saying that i do feel that democracy in Britian has become 'soft' towards criminals etc and a certain 'strengthening' of government is required, but not to the level of Nazi Germany.
Calum169 4 years ago
England needs a revolution and a destruction of those who have power today. You must reject the Rothschild-owned structure and those who makes you an American state.
Democracy there is not soft towards simple criminals - it defers to Islamic lunatics and Zionist lies. England now upholds Sharia law, and is losing identity and value. Did your soldiers die for this? The did not fight for Englandistan.
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
I agree with what your saying (please refer to my nation as Britain and not england) The Subjection of the European peoples cannot continue. Europe must fight for its spiritual and physical survival. The peoples of Europe must put aside their petty nationalism. We must be united by a common cause. The European people must find the will within themselves to reject multiculturalism and materialism. They must forge a future for themselves and their children.
Calum169 4 years ago
If you insist - then Britainistan :)
The multicultural materialist ideal is the work of Zionists, they know this destroys national identity and value. This is towards their new world order, one government and a two tier society of serf and elite. They have owned England for 200 years. Your people must reject them.
I agree Europe must unite,we should forget the mistakes of the past,knowing that if one of us dies, we all die.
We were fooled to fight each other while the true enemy was elsewhere.
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
good video
udonthavthisname 4 years ago
Kuess mich im Arsch du Schweinhund
muzikfan001 4 years ago
The best work of SA.
Sieg Heil kameraden
zambonicorse84 4 years ago 3
scheiß nazi hurenkinder
proskaterwerni 4 years ago
scheiß antifa drecksau
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
I was wondering what everyone thinks of the NAZI euthanasia program (for retards). Personally I think it was great, retarded people really serve no purpose and are an embarrasement.
chelloveck84 4 years ago 2
HA HA HA HA ANTIFA
88!
bogsvarog 4 years ago
National Socialism --> It's Great!
catkicker777 4 years ago
FANTASTIC!
morrink 4 years ago
does anyone know the name of this song?
chelloveck84 4 years ago
'Wir sind die braunen Soldaten'
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
Interesting that the SA had, in my opinion, better songs than the SS. This together with the Horst Wessel Lied and Volk ans Gewehr are some of the very best. Also the HJ was part of the SA until 1936 (I think) and they had great songs too.
aufstand1848 4 years ago 2
I agree with you - SA and HJ songs are the best. Some military songs are good, but not many good songs related to SS.
I also have good thoughts of SA and HJ in general. These were not truly bad organizations.
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
SS were a pretty austere and serious group...no time for song.
synthwerk 4 years ago 2
@aufstand1848 yeah
delgande 1 month ago
The term 'racism' is a joke anyway - overused by professional victims to further their worthless causes.
It is not racist to not want every race to invade and destroy the homeland built by your people.
All races and people can have value, and they are free to build and have pride - at their own home.
Europe owes these people nothing.
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
If Hitler saw the natzis today he would cry.... seeing what they have been reduced to... pericing and perverted twisted punks.... he liked it Military style and perfection.. not the swabble they are today.
Miratesus 4 years ago 4
You are correct with this opinion. Even though the SA could be disorganized and wild, at their worst they were superior to so-called Nazis of today.
I often think modern Nazis are a consipiracy to discredit the swastika, with many members belonging in reality to opposition of Nazis.
ArturAxmann 4 years ago
LOL you said it. And the once so wonderful music of National Socialism has been turned into degenerated "Nazi" hate-rock today.
Trev1er02 4 years ago 2
SA, SS and other thinks in NS state are good :]
NORDBERTSS 4 years ago