US paratroopers fought kraut paratroops & Canentan & operation varsity, defeating them. The Kraut army destoyed every west European army before it & was stopped by the US, so don't even try 2 say the Brit army was better , they were defeated @ Dunkirk- don't forget that. We r ur allies u assholes. Germany lost the fucking war- get over it.
What crap are you talking about? Nazi-Germany never defeated the Brits. Brits may be West-European but they were perfectly protected by beeing an island and having no land connections to West-European. And Nazi-Germany didn't lose to US Forces because of their skills, tactics or capabilities, it was because after years of kicking US asses the Germans were finally overpowered by man power. The German Forces were too small to actually win anything at all.
So it is a shame for the US Forces. Because they needed more then ten times of man power then German Forces. And in the end, it wasn't US Forces who defeated the Germans it was the Royal British Air Force and the mass soviets. The US Forces were flies getting punched.
@GermanOpenings brit raf never WON, hitler chose 2 attack cities rather than strategic targets- airfields etc... hitlers mistakes cause him 2 lose, not raf or russians.
@soshanna68 Either way, the RAF prevailed, they stopped the Luftwaffe attaiing air supremacy, which in turn ended any possibility of an invasion of the UK. It also shattered German illusions that they could not be thwarted. It matters not that Hitler/Goring made tactical/strategic errors-that is how campaigns are either lost or won ie the very nature of war. If the BoB was not a victory, what was it, a defeat?! lol Better luck next time.......
@soshanna68 You have a very simplistic view. You assume that US forces were superior to the Germans simply because they prevailed in battle during the Normandy campaign. Which side had TOTAL air superiority? Which side had unlimited reserves of tanks, SP guns & large manpower reserves? The allies, or the Germans? The question you should ask, is how come the allies took SO long to defeat the Germans, even though they had such advantages over them? Dunkirk? Who had air superiority?!
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1st, fuck stick, u r unable 2 discern what my comment was referring 2, I was speaking about fallschirmjager- not the entire war or every aspect of the US military. Air superiority- well that's hitler's & goering's fault. You totally avoid my actual comment & speak on another. And it did take longer than needed 2 defeat hitler, mostly because fucking roosevelt was kissing ass 2 the brits & russians so they wouldn't feel inferior 2 US forces. Berlin could've fell 2 the US.
@soshanna68 What an imbecilic comment. Let's do some basic maths shall we? How many Russians died smashing the fighting power of the Wehrmacht? Answer- 20,000,000 Russian soldiers. They killed 4,000,000 German soldiers. How man US soldiers died? Less than 500,000. More British soldiers died in WW2 than did US soldiers because we fought for FIVE years, Not THREE. Defeating Hitler's Germany took a massive united effort which the US cold never have achieved alone. What an arrogant fool you are lol
@soshanna68 There is an old military adage, "NOBODY KNOWS YOU BETTER THAN YOUR ENEMY." Afterall, he fights you, so he knows your strengths & weaknesses. You will discover if you bother to read any accounts by Germans about the allies, that they respected the British far more as fighters than the US army. The Germans as a rule had scant regard for the US infantry, EG Research how sloppy US radio operators were. Their security discipline was appalling-ask the Germans who gained lots of intel!
@soshanna68 It matters not that they lost, that was a sure thing by 1944 due to overwhelming numbers arrayed against them on both fronts. The point merely highlights the lack of core professionalism that existed in the US army at that time. Battle Of The Bulge? Do you know WHY the Germans attacked the US sector? Because recce/intel work established that US forces failed to maintain proper standing patrols of a night time on the front line. US tropps would go out for hours, then sneak back-POOR!
The Fallschirmjager- EVERYTIME-all things being equal. The same goes for the Wehrmacht v the US Army. It is a FACT that when the allies & Germans met on EQUAL terms, the Germans generally prevailed. This was actually recognised by senior Allied cmdrs. The German soldiers had much greater levels of discipline than their US counterparts. They were better trained, better equipped & better lead at all levels-no doubt about it. The closest in performance & mentality to the Germans were the British.
@fluffy1931 You miss the point entirely, and frankly, I simply cannot be bothered repeating it other than to reiterate that as a general rule, the allies did not prevail against the Germans unless they had significant materiel & man power advantages. This point was even acknowledged by senior allied commanders. The Germans were highly professional. well trained, well equipped & very well led at ALL levels. No respected military historian eg Hastings, Keegan, Beevor, would argue otherwise.
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH yeah and wehrmacht depended on 2.4 million horses for their horse drawn wagons instead of being 'well equip'd' with motorized transport?
After 1943 the wehrmacht was on the defense the US and UK were on the offensive which is more difficult the offensive or defensive position? Not your superior german fantasy. gtfoh
@fluffy1931 The fact that the Wehrmacht relied on a degree of horse drawn transport is neither here nor there, does that belittle their ability as soldiers? 1st SS Panzercorps was a superior military formation to ANYTHING possessed by the allies, their performance in Normandy was stunning considering the odds were stacked overwhelmingly against them. As I said, the allies had total air superiority, masses of men & equipment & they should have gone through the Germans like a knife through butter.
@fluffy1931 The fact that the allies took two months to breakdown the German defence in Normandy is a direct reflection on the fighting ability of the German forces. Unlike yourself, I have an entirely OBJECTIVE, impartial view of history. I do not arrogantly assume that the allies won due to their superiority as soldiers, because that was most certainly not the case. US infantry were at best, mediocre compared to the Germans. Read "Six Armies In Normandy," by John Keegan, it will open your eyes
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH yeah - and nothing to with the hegderows or that body of water known as the English channel? you need too sniff more glue. bend over dude.
@fluffy1931 Whilst the bocage countryside assisted the Germans in defensive action, that does not explain the gap in performance between the German forces, who had no air support, dwindling manpower & equipment scales, & the allies who had total air superiority, massive materiel/man power resupply etc. I suspect Max Hastings, Patrick Bishop, John Keegan. Milton Shulman & Michael Reynolds, who are respected historians, would agree entirely with the points I have raised. OBJECTIVITY-go look it up.
@fluffy1931 And how did the allies get to the stage where Falaise happened? Simple, the British, Canadians & Poles fought the cream of the Wehrmacht & SS Panzer divisions to the point whereby they were no longer able to maintain a cohesive defensive front & they had to withdraw. Concurrently, the US fought predominantly B class divisions & NO SS armoured divs. Falaise was an ALLIED manouevre, NOT merely a US movement. The Poles shut the door actually. Bend over yourself-you know nothing!
The British operation GOODWOOD, on the eastern flank, failed miserably but attracted German reserves. It was the US operation COBRA, on the western flank, that developed into a breakout.
On Aug 1 1944' Third US Army became operational under Patton, forming part of Twelfth Army Group under Bradley. The two commanders recognized that, instead of sweeping down into Brittany, the bulk of Third Army should be swung eastwards towards the Seine. gtfoh
@fluffy1931 GOODWOOD may well have stalled, but it still served the PRIMARY strategic purpose of engaging & tying down the bulk of the German armoured formations in Normandy. You clearly have no concept whatsoever of the allied strategy in Normandy. The British & Candians were tasked with sucking in & tying down the buk of the German's armoured forces. This was achieved by maintaining continual pressure with offensive action-forcing the Germans to commit increasing numbers of the their reserves.
@fluffy1931 Although GOODWOOD did not suceed in terms of the geographical strategic objectives set, it succeeded in that it tied the Germans down & ground down their defensive capability. Normandy was predominantly a battle of attrition, the Germans were forced to commit dwindling resources in a defensive action, it was a meatgrinder. The US forces did NOT face 1st SS Panzer corps, nor any of the other elite SS formations of note. Cobra occurred when the German front was at breaking point.
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH the gap was first closed on Aug 19' when units from the US 90th Div met units from the 1st Polish Armored Div.. But the Poles northern flank was stretched thin and this allowed german units to breakthrough especially in the area around Mont Ormel and the northern flank was not secured until Aug 21st.
@fluffy1931 Falaise, you point is WHAT exactly? Tell me, how many SS Panzer divisions did the US forces face in Normady? ANSWER ZERO, the British & Canadians were busy grinding them down in a battle of attrition, whilst the US army fought B class divisons. Yanks- biggest mouths, least historical knowledge & most arrogant with it.
@fluffy1931 I will not debate the subject any further with you. Re Normandy strategy, and the key role played by Britain & Canada in drawing in German armoured formations, thereby tying them down, read any of the following:- "Six Armies In Normandy," John Keegan- internationally recognised as THE definitive account of Normandy. "Overlord," Max Hastings another classic book, "D-Day," Anthony Beevor, and "Men Of Steel- 1st SS Panzer Corps In Normandy," Maj Gen Michael Reynolds- an SS expert.
@fluffy1931 Thank you for you banal, assine remark. That was VERY American of you. If you cannot offer a well thought out argument to counter somebody else, just hurl childish insults- The American Way! ROFL.
@fluffy1931 I guess you know your own tricks best! You seem obsessed with homosexuality, perhaps you should be honest & come out the closet, you will feel so much better about yourself. No more need to live a lie, you can go & hang out with people of a similiar nature at the Blue Oyster Bar. Personally, I will stick to women.
You are pathetic, you are incapable of mounting anything remotely ressembling an argument, so you resort to junior school yard insults-imbecile.
@fluffy1931 Thanks for that- Moron. You run along now back to your infants school, it's time for milk & cookies. Get back to me when you have grown up into an adult & you actually have something intelligent to say. I will not be holding my breath..........Somewhere, there is a village just crying out for an idiot such as yourself.
@fluffy1931 Evidently you are very easily amused, a clear indication of the paucity of your intellect. You have the brain of a simian. As highlighted earlier, you offer nothing but innane attempts to insult. Grow up you moronic prick.
@fluffy1931 Thanks for that halfwit. You appear utterly obsessed with homosexuality & the associated acts that such lifestyles involve. Clearly you are a repressed homosexual, since you constantly refer to homo activities, it is evidently on your mind all the time. Personally, I will stick to women, feel free to go cottaging in men's toilet cubicles if that sort of sordid activity floats your boat. Cheers wank stain!
@fluffy1931 In addition, I would suggest you research how many SS Panzer divisions the US forces had to contend with in Normandy. Guess what the answer is ZERO. The British & Candians fought the cream SS formations EG 1ST SS Panzercorps. The whole strategy in Normandy was for British & Canadian forces to draw in the German armoured divisions by continually applying pressure to the front. This forced the Germans to commit more & more of their armour formations to stop any advance.
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH whats that got to do with your love affair for the wehrmacht and their'e 2.4 million horses used by 4/5 ths of the wehrmacht too pull wagons. The US Army was not responsible for how german forces deployed at Normandy?
also bin so einsam
VeraJoanierw547 1 month ago
einfach wunderbar!!!
hoyhoyhoy23 9 months ago
danke tetescki
MSICSAF 11 months ago
US paratroopers fought kraut paratroops & Canentan & operation varsity, defeating them. The Kraut army destoyed every west European army before it & was stopped by the US, so don't even try 2 say the Brit army was better , they were defeated @ Dunkirk- don't forget that. We r ur allies u assholes. Germany lost the fucking war- get over it.
soshanna68 1 year ago
@soshanna68
What crap are you talking about? Nazi-Germany never defeated the Brits. Brits may be West-European but they were perfectly protected by beeing an island and having no land connections to West-European. And Nazi-Germany didn't lose to US Forces because of their skills, tactics or capabilities, it was because after years of kicking US asses the Germans were finally overpowered by man power. The German Forces were too small to actually win anything at all.
GermanOpenings 1 year ago
@soshanna68
So it is a shame for the US Forces. Because they needed more then ten times of man power then German Forces. And in the end, it wasn't US Forces who defeated the Germans it was the Royal British Air Force and the mass soviets. The US Forces were flies getting punched.
GermanOpenings 1 year ago
@GermanOpenings brit raf never WON, hitler chose 2 attack cities rather than strategic targets- airfields etc... hitlers mistakes cause him 2 lose, not raf or russians.
soshanna68 1 year ago
@soshanna68 Either way, the RAF prevailed, they stopped the Luftwaffe attaiing air supremacy, which in turn ended any possibility of an invasion of the UK. It also shattered German illusions that they could not be thwarted. It matters not that Hitler/Goring made tactical/strategic errors-that is how campaigns are either lost or won ie the very nature of war. If the BoB was not a victory, what was it, a defeat?! lol Better luck next time.......
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@soshanna68 You have a very simplistic view. You assume that US forces were superior to the Germans simply because they prevailed in battle during the Normandy campaign. Which side had TOTAL air superiority? Which side had unlimited reserves of tanks, SP guns & large manpower reserves? The allies, or the Germans? The question you should ask, is how come the allies took SO long to defeat the Germans, even though they had such advantages over them? Dunkirk? Who had air superiority?!
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1st, fuck stick, u r unable 2 discern what my comment was referring 2, I was speaking about fallschirmjager- not the entire war or every aspect of the US military. Air superiority- well that's hitler's & goering's fault. You totally avoid my actual comment & speak on another. And it did take longer than needed 2 defeat hitler, mostly because fucking roosevelt was kissing ass 2 the brits & russians so they wouldn't feel inferior 2 US forces. Berlin could've fell 2 the US.
soshanna68 1 year ago
@soshanna68 What an imbecilic comment. Let's do some basic maths shall we? How many Russians died smashing the fighting power of the Wehrmacht? Answer- 20,000,000 Russian soldiers. They killed 4,000,000 German soldiers. How man US soldiers died? Less than 500,000. More British soldiers died in WW2 than did US soldiers because we fought for FIVE years, Not THREE. Defeating Hitler's Germany took a massive united effort which the US cold never have achieved alone. What an arrogant fool you are lol
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@soshanna68 There is an old military adage, "NOBODY KNOWS YOU BETTER THAN YOUR ENEMY." Afterall, he fights you, so he knows your strengths & weaknesses. You will discover if you bother to read any accounts by Germans about the allies, that they respected the British far more as fighters than the US army. The Germans as a rule had scant regard for the US infantry, EG Research how sloppy US radio operators were. Their security discipline was appalling-ask the Germans who gained lots of intel!
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH yet it didn't help them @ all, all the intel & they still lost- amazing.
soshanna68 1 year ago
@soshanna68 It matters not that they lost, that was a sure thing by 1944 due to overwhelming numbers arrayed against them on both fronts. The point merely highlights the lack of core professionalism that existed in the US army at that time. Battle Of The Bulge? Do you know WHY the Germans attacked the US sector? Because recce/intel work established that US forces failed to maintain proper standing patrols of a night time on the front line. US tropps would go out for hours, then sneak back-POOR!
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
im american but i like the german falschirmjager better than the 82nd and 101st
Ottocariustiger 2 years ago
Excellent!!!! Greetings from Greece!!!
A270178D 3 years ago
who do u think would win American Paratroopers against german paratroopers-Fallschirmjager
jimmypav69 3 years ago
Fallschirmjaeger would win, the Americans even admit it.
fallschirmjager0000 3 years ago 4
The Fallschirmjager- EVERYTIME-all things being equal. The same goes for the Wehrmacht v the US Army. It is a FACT that when the allies & Germans met on EQUAL terms, the Germans generally prevailed. This was actually recognised by senior Allied cmdrs. The German soldiers had much greater levels of discipline than their US counterparts. They were better trained, better equipped & better lead at all levels-no doubt about it. The closest in performance & mentality to the Germans were the British.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 2 years ago 2
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH explain pls how is it equal if the US Army is facing a wehrmacht for all intents and purposes after 1943' is on the defense?
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 You miss the point entirely, and frankly, I simply cannot be bothered repeating it other than to reiterate that as a general rule, the allies did not prevail against the Germans unless they had significant materiel & man power advantages. This point was even acknowledged by senior allied commanders. The Germans were highly professional. well trained, well equipped & very well led at ALL levels. No respected military historian eg Hastings, Keegan, Beevor, would argue otherwise.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH yeah and wehrmacht depended on 2.4 million horses for their horse drawn wagons instead of being 'well equip'd' with motorized transport?
After 1943 the wehrmacht was on the defense the US and UK were on the offensive which is more difficult the offensive or defensive position? Not your superior german fantasy. gtfoh
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 The fact that the Wehrmacht relied on a degree of horse drawn transport is neither here nor there, does that belittle their ability as soldiers? 1st SS Panzercorps was a superior military formation to ANYTHING possessed by the allies, their performance in Normandy was stunning considering the odds were stacked overwhelmingly against them. As I said, the allies had total air superiority, masses of men & equipment & they should have gone through the Germans like a knife through butter.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 The fact that the allies took two months to breakdown the German defence in Normandy is a direct reflection on the fighting ability of the German forces. Unlike yourself, I have an entirely OBJECTIVE, impartial view of history. I do not arrogantly assume that the allies won due to their superiority as soldiers, because that was most certainly not the case. US infantry were at best, mediocre compared to the Germans. Read "Six Armies In Normandy," by John Keegan, it will open your eyes
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH yeah - and nothing to with the hegderows or that body of water known as the English channel? you need too sniff more glue. bend over dude.
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 Whilst the bocage countryside assisted the Germans in defensive action, that does not explain the gap in performance between the German forces, who had no air support, dwindling manpower & equipment scales, & the allies who had total air superiority, massive materiel/man power resupply etc. I suspect Max Hastings, Patrick Bishop, John Keegan. Milton Shulman & Michael Reynolds, who are respected historians, would agree entirely with the points I have raised. OBJECTIVITY-go look it up.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH ..,go look up Falaise Gap ? August 12 - 21 1944, was the decisive engagement of the Battle of Normandy. Now bend over. gtfoh
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 And how did the allies get to the stage where Falaise happened? Simple, the British, Canadians & Poles fought the cream of the Wehrmacht & SS Panzer divisions to the point whereby they were no longer able to maintain a cohesive defensive front & they had to withdraw. Concurrently, the US fought predominantly B class divisions & NO SS armoured divs. Falaise was an ALLIED manouevre, NOT merely a US movement. The Poles shut the door actually. Bend over yourself-you know nothing!
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH keep sniffing glue dude.
The British operation GOODWOOD, on the eastern flank, failed miserably but attracted German reserves. It was the US operation COBRA, on the western flank, that developed into a breakout.
On Aug 1 1944' Third US Army became operational under Patton, forming part of Twelfth Army Group under Bradley. The two commanders recognized that, instead of sweeping down into Brittany, the bulk of Third Army should be swung eastwards towards the Seine. gtfoh
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 GOODWOOD may well have stalled, but it still served the PRIMARY strategic purpose of engaging & tying down the bulk of the German armoured formations in Normandy. You clearly have no concept whatsoever of the allied strategy in Normandy. The British & Candians were tasked with sucking in & tying down the buk of the German's armoured forces. This was achieved by maintaining continual pressure with offensive action-forcing the Germans to commit increasing numbers of the their reserves.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 Although GOODWOOD did not suceed in terms of the geographical strategic objectives set, it succeeded in that it tied the Germans down & ground down their defensive capability. Normandy was predominantly a battle of attrition, the Germans were forced to commit dwindling resources in a defensive action, it was a meatgrinder. The US forces did NOT face 1st SS Panzer corps, nor any of the other elite SS formations of note. Cobra occurred when the German front was at breaking point.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH the gap was first closed on Aug 19' when units from the US 90th Div met units from the 1st Polish Armored Div.. But the Poles northern flank was stretched thin and this allowed german units to breakthrough especially in the area around Mont Ormel and the northern flank was not secured until Aug 21st.
keep bending over assclown.
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 Falaise, you point is WHAT exactly? Tell me, how many SS Panzer divisions did the US forces face in Normady? ANSWER ZERO, the British & Canadians were busy grinding them down in a battle of attrition, whilst the US army fought B class divisons. Yanks- biggest mouths, least historical knowledge & most arrogant with it.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 I will not debate the subject any further with you. Re Normandy strategy, and the key role played by Britain & Canada in drawing in German armoured formations, thereby tying them down, read any of the following:- "Six Armies In Normandy," John Keegan- internationally recognised as THE definitive account of Normandy. "Overlord," Max Hastings another classic book, "D-Day," Anthony Beevor, and "Men Of Steel- 1st SS Panzer Corps In Normandy," Maj Gen Michael Reynolds- an SS expert.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH relax nazi fagtard!
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 Thank you for you banal, assine remark. That was VERY American of you. If you cannot offer a well thought out argument to counter somebody else, just hurl childish insults- The American Way! ROFL.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH.., pull out the 'nazi fagtard' penis before you ROFL .
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 I am certain you know far more about dragging yourself around your bedroom- WANKER.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH another 'nazi fagtard' penis lover .
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 I guess you know your own tricks best! You seem obsessed with homosexuality, perhaps you should be honest & come out the closet, you will feel so much better about yourself. No more need to live a lie, you can go & hang out with people of a similiar nature at the Blue Oyster Bar. Personally, I will stick to women.
You are pathetic, you are incapable of mounting anything remotely ressembling an argument, so you resort to junior school yard insults-imbecile.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH ..,your sticking to 'nazi fagtard penis' dude. your'e obsession with nazi fagtards is hilarious. gtfoh
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 Thanks for that- Moron. You run along now back to your infants school, it's time for milk & cookies. Get back to me when you have grown up into an adult & you actually have something intelligent to say. I will not be holding my breath..........Somewhere, there is a village just crying out for an idiot such as yourself.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 Evidently you are very easily amused, a clear indication of the paucity of your intellect. You have the brain of a simian. As highlighted earlier, you offer nothing but innane attempts to insult. Grow up you moronic prick.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH.., keep shoving that 'nazi fagtard penis' up your'e bum, assclown.
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 Thanks for that halfwit. You appear utterly obsessed with homosexuality & the associated acts that such lifestyles involve. Clearly you are a repressed homosexual, since you constantly refer to homo activities, it is evidently on your mind all the time. Personally, I will stick to women, feel free to go cottaging in men's toilet cubicles if that sort of sordid activity floats your boat. Cheers wank stain!
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH keep shoving that 'nazi fagtard penis' up into your'e bum, assclown.
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 In addition, I would suggest you research how many SS Panzer divisions the US forces had to contend with in Normandy. Guess what the answer is ZERO. The British & Candians fought the cream SS formations EG 1ST SS Panzercorps. The whole strategy in Normandy was for British & Canadian forces to draw in the German armoured divisions by continually applying pressure to the front. This forced the Germans to commit more & more of their armour formations to stop any advance.
LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH 1 year ago
@LIVERPOOLSCOTTISH whats that got to do with your love affair for the wehrmacht and their'e 2.4 million horses used by 4/5 ths of the wehrmacht too pull wagons. The US Army was not responsible for how german forces deployed at Normandy?
fluffy1931 1 year ago
Answer: Operation Market Garden.
Der Fallschirmjager!!!!!!!
huath1234 2 years ago
Of cuz Fallschirmjager.
The American Paratroopers were mostly regular units.
Fallschirmjaeger were kind of a elite unit in the Wehrmacht.
natsplit 2 years ago
I like how you opened it up with the little history lesson. Perhaps I will do that for some of my future videos.
Great pictures you used there,
and a great version of the song ;)
GordonofSeattle 3 years ago
thank you
n00bssuck 4 years ago
good video :)xD
rommel5055 4 years ago
Good vid.
ww2fan39 4 years ago