Added: 4 years ago
From: Gravitationalist
Views: 26,348
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i dont get any of this!!!! :'(

  • why do people need to fight over there beliefs don't you have better things to do evolution is a theory people aren't saying is absolutely true can't you have a belief in god or whoever your deity is, whats the problem with just accepting evolution and stop all this fighting over which is false there are much more important things to do.

  • You Tube is my Alam Matar

    Merci beaucoup

    Johnny de BANGKOK

    Royaume de Thailande

  • MORE THAN MANGE—What's being taught to our children is that the govt. IS the authority on the U.S. Constitution. Just as the Holy Father, Pope Ben 16, is incapable of erring on matters of Faith, so it shall be understood that the central {formerly Federal} govt. is incapable of violating the document that its employees have sworn an oath to protect and to defend.

  • Chemo- & radio- "therapies" are NEVER efficacious with regards to malignant (trophoblastic) growth—for in the long history of chronic metabolic diseases none have, nor could they possibly be, cured through mechanical manipulation of the body. The preventative, control & cure for this singular, noncommunicable disease known as cancer is the naturally-occurring-cyanide-ri­ch substance: Amygdalin (a.k.a. vitamin B17, & in its refined state: Laetrile).

  • @TheFutureUnquiet Methamphetamine is dangerous and makes people say really stupid shit.

  • Autism is mercury-poisoning [hydrargyrism n. poisoning with mercury; mercurialism], as prescribed by our pharmaceutical cartels as eugenics is population decimation as granted in granite on the Georgia Guide Stones.

  • @TheFutureUnquiet Autism is not mercury-poisoning. i am asperger and i find your misinformation about subject very offensive.

  • New Hampshiran

  • so why not ponder on them HUHHHHH?

  • Charles Darwin's latent homosexuality were proven, photographically and mathematically, the world would still be burdened with the eugenics that his pitiable monkeyshines have wrought.

  • @TheFutureUnquiet You're an idiot.

  • @zzyzx0788 : Where's your gay-pride now?

  • @TheFutureUnquiet I'm quite frankly flabbergasted by some of the things you say. Please stop posting, because everytime I read one of your nonsensical ramblings I feel a little dumber.

  • @TheFutureUnquiet lol. you called him gay. that's gay. but seriusly. its obvius that you are trying in your own mind to demonize charles darwin. even if charles had been goose rapping tentical monster, who got his kicks from sodomising starks. it changes not the fact that he was right on evolution. besides. there is nothing bad about homosexuality. charles was not one thou. nither am i. i am more of an bi, is fuck everything that moves.

  • did they just walk out the window>??? lol

  • @celticschampions yes they did. it was a common thing. houses were offent taxed by the number of doors they have. Windows work as well as doors if noy better at times

  • I can't understand how there be two candidates if you say there is only one god, but i sure that atheist also have morality and justice, lastly, it is free for you to glaim that the first cell is created by god, but bible can't be an evidence, everyone can claim he or somthing create the universe, because we not yet know how this happen.

  • To Acmd7 : Your evidences are really can't be an evidence. We can find many wrong things in bible by science, like the impossible big flood, if miracles always happen, i think the problem in the earth will not exist, if one will punished, the one who don't believe your god will die and there will be no other religon.

  • @Acmd7 Why do you keep postng the same shit on every video? Why don`t you just kill yourself so you can meet your God sooner?

  • pfff if i was Darwin i'd be so frigtend to publish my theory. lucky us he published it :)

  • @racoonTK Others were onto the same theory. Darwin eventually published his work for fear someone else would take credit for it.

  • Darwin's wife was a dumb bitch.

  • Who is that artist that they visit?

  • OK Just kidding lol : )

  • Because we evolved from the fifth ape called homo sapiens and we share a common ancestor with the other apes.

    Plus, evolution takess a lot of time to see it in a lifetime...plus the theory of Darwin could had been debunked by genetics, but what genetics found was our genetic connection with apes.

    Watch Ken Miller for more. Good luck man.

  • I heard that about Ken Miller's research. It is the #2 chromosome pair that is two chromes mutated/fused into one which explains why modern apes have 24 chromosome pairs and humans have 23 chromosome pairs.

  • Because evolution doesn't try to make one species into another. Humans are related to the other great apes because we share a common ancestor, we have overlapping DNA and clear morphological similarities, we have many of the same mutations and the same ERV markers.

    A Chihuahua will never be a Great Dane but you know that they are both breeds of dogs (they are actually a ring species, cross breeding them is not feasible) and that they both share a common ancestor. The same applies to us.

  • aye aye

  • I can never understand the eye thing that creationists like to go on about... We have eyes...Big deal! Chimpanzees have eyes, so do dogs, cats and rats!!!

  • they think that the eye is to complicated to evolve but this has been debunked several times

  • @darkuser999 Indeed, it's total bullshit, they talk about how complex it is, even though it's ratehr simple in terms of life, plus- 3.5 billion years can do a lot of things, if they say something is too complex. : >

  • @darkuser999 theres many diff styles and or placments of eyes ya f n idiot and im an idiot aswell yes but its only obvious JACKASS

  • @TheRealJimbalZ what are you smoking???

  • @darkuser999 weed but not today unfortunatley

  • @darkuser999 Scallops and flatworms and box jellyfish have eyes!

  • @darkuser999 The problem is that as the more complex a thing is, the less chance there is for it to happen without intent. Other animals with eyes aren't any different from humans in this aspect. The idea is that it's about as likely for a colonial-style house with plumbing and electricity to spring up, unguided, from the primal earth simply because it had eons to do so. Even DNA and cellular structure are very complex.

  • @darkuser999 watch the doc "The blind watch maker" by richard dawkins he explains in detail the fail of creationist argument on about how such a complex organ can arise from simple origins and without intelligent intervention.

  • @sushanalone guys i was making a point and not putting a question!!!

  • Wonderful.

  • cool

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more