These cameras cost so unbelievably much. Sure, you may think black and white is cheap, but think again when you find out these cameras record at millions of frames per second.
Camera's that shoot at over one megapixel (1024x1024) in color, over 3000 fps generally cost way over $10,000
just in reply to a few comments on here how can a slower bullet do more demage then a fast one providing they are two bullets of the same design basikally this would make a slingshot a more effective weapon it would also make it safer to get shot at point blank range than at a distance
firstly, noname was using meters not feet in his post. second, a pistol bullet such as the colt 1911 45. only shoots around 900fps. its the size and mass of the round that makes it so deadly, not nessasarily speed
@cam5533 the m1 garand shoots a .30cal (30.06) 150grain bullet with a muzzle velocity of 2800fps. my 11yr old nephew made the comment of 1000-3000fps, im here to back him up.
@SpudBusterSAE You have no idea what you're talking about.
The most famous loading of the.357 S&W Magnum cartridge spits out a 125gr. bullet at 1500fps; even standard 9mm loadings are supersonic, with those most commonly encountered falling between 1200 and 1300fps.
Your 1000-3000fps range for rifles is equally absurd. Most far exceed 1000fps, and this has been the case with America's standard infantry rifles for more than 150yrs. Your ceiling suggests that you have never heard of 5.56x45mm.
I believe you would be looking at at least $5000 + dollars for a camera that does about 5000 fps. There is however the Casio EXF1, and theat takes 1200 fps. I believe they run around $1000.
@MrMuscleMacho yes, no, well sort of. if the camera films at 1200 frames per second and lets say a bullet travels arround 1200 feet per second, that would mean that the bullet would travel 1 foot every frame.
pixmania model no. is JVC GZ-HD7, i didn't know how to make a super slo-mo out of it. it had adjustable af and a full hd camera. it-s pretty nice. unfortunately my father sold it
a Hummer H1 driving into a brich wall at 30 MPH all that force is asborbed through the human body and the force depends on the caliber of the gun IE .50 cal BMG would be equivelent to a hummer running into to a brick wall at 70MPH roughly
You are a fucking idiot. If that were true, those guns would be unable to fire by a human because they would put that much force into the shooter. haha be real, a hummer at 70mph?
@randomletterz true. Momentum is a good way to judge recoil as well. 300 lb/feet (in a perfect world) would move a 300 lb. object one foot. Sounds pretty "real world" accurate for a .50 BMG recoil, doesn't it?
@hpiownzilla01 totally wrong. A hummer with a gross vehicle weight of over 10,000 lbs. traveling at roughly 105 feet/sec. has momentum of approximately 1.1 million lb./feet. A 650 grain .50 BMG slug moving at 3,000 feet/sec. has momentum of approximately 300 lb./feet. It isn't even "roughly" similar.
none of you guys under stand, lets say you have a 9mm bullet , the cartrige is only 1 inch long the bullet its self only takes up 1/8th inch of the cartrige... most 9mm bullets have 23-34 grains of gun powder when the primer is ignited it burns the powder and gases created expands over 3,000 times its original volume thus forcing the projectile anywear from 1,100FPS- 7,800FPS much more than a human could everthrow push thrust whatever the amout of energy released from a gun equivelent to
probably a hydra shock bullet whcih were banned from indaho in the 90's they were made to go throught kevlar vest's but they were unbanned in early 2000's but they cost alot of money
Guys, it all comes down to kinetic energy, impact cross- section and target resistance. While the mass of a bullet is small, its speed is high (and speed goes into kinetic energy by the power of 2). Moreover, the cross-section of a bullet is very small, so the kinetic energy is delivered in a very small area. And lastly, the resistance to penetration determines (in addition to the hardness of the bullet) the depth of penetration. That's all there is.
Actually it is a well known fact that a well executed ninja star could travel faster than a bullet. It would have to be thrown from a TRAINED ninja though.
What do you mean, it's well known who wins? A bullet's worth of gunpowder has far less energy than someone's muscles can impart to an object; it just releases it much much faster and transfers it more efficiently.
do you at least understand the basics of phisiqs? how is possible some one over throw a granade blast with pure muscle power?? its insane! and for some reason people tend to die wen hitted by a bullet, that dos not happens on boxing challenges, you get hit by a punch and you go k.o. , if the punch was a bullet you would be dead.
I think you're confusing kinetic energy with momentum. The gun-powder charge in a typical rifle puts out about 5 kJ(about as much energy as 0.3 g of sugar).
If humans were as efficient as a pistol at transfering energy to a bullet you'd need as much energy as an olympic level pole vaulter generates on the run-up to a jump just to launch one measily bullet.
Now I see your problem. You have confused two issues I have addressed: slow bullet=large wound (which I said was wrong) and why the tennis ball reacted less when hit. Re-read my posts. And learn a bit about the physics of moving objects. It is obvious you know very little.
BTW, I may be quick to insult, but I do give my reasons. You insult without giving a reason.
actually the resistance remains the same, unless you discard the law of conservation of energy. which states energey can neither be created nor destroyed, and i only insult those who insult me, in which case, i can become nasty. I come across many internet geniuses, who google the subject and become instant gurus on the topic.
point in case, an object moving slower will cause more collateral damage. the resistance remains the same, but the inertia is lower, which causes the bullet to "shroom"
Dude, you REALLY do need to study up on basic physics before debating the subject. Resistance increases as the square of the velocity, you are one of those "internet geniuses", and a fast bullet will cause more damage than a slow one, i.e. .22 LR vs .22 short.
Seriously, though, find someone in your area who knows physics(an engineer, physicists, etc.) and ask them to explain it to you.
Tennis ball is hollow. Not much mass to displace compared to the mass of the entire object.
Slower speed leaves a larger exit wound?? Guess again. Energy is en exponential product of velocity, more energy=larger wound. Less energy=smaller wound. Low enough energy=no exit.
The term "much" is relative. If two identical bullets are fired through identical mediums at different velocities the faster bullet will expend more energy to pass through than will the slower bullet. It's all very basic physics. The energy required by a projectile to pass through a medium, whether it be air, water, rubber, whatever, is a product of the drag induced by the medium and the velocity of the projectile SQUARED.
When telling someone they are wrong it is a good idea to tell them what they are wrong about and why. Don't be afraid to jump in and explain your point of view.
why explain it when you can just look it up on wiki...I'm not going to try and use fancy terms....my claims are based on pure experience. I live in the desert. I can go shooting anytime i like.
An object traveling a a higher speed will have more resistance, not less. Unless you toss out Newton's laws. A dull knife causes more damage becuse it is dull not because it is slower. Like I said before, learn something about basic physics. This is a very simple concept.
As far as being quick to insult, I guess all those insults on other threads were made by someone using your name.
And I must admit it is pretty sad that you have to stalk my other comments to insult me. actually, it's kind of scary. you're quite childish for someone your age, vendictive, even.
@SuperTbucket I concur. I was shot at close range by an Exocet misslie. Think of the energy there, its little wonder it completely messed up my hair do. Mega strength hair gel for me next time i get in the way of a missile!
great, now that you posted that, some crazy mother fucker is going to go out on a killing spree and try to stop bullets with a sword because he thinks he's a jedi knight, and then come and sue Youtube for allowing such comments
lol, just kidding, but i recently heard a rather retarded story, and while this is unlikely, it could easily happen, and you konw what, i wouldnt be suprised if the guy won, such a sad sad world we live in . . . . :(
This is how chuck noris plays golf.
GMELECTRONICS365 6 months ago
The shooter has a real dislike of sports.
MPH84 1 year ago 8
@MPH84 golf is not a sport
andrewkadar 10 months ago 3
These cameras cost so unbelievably much. Sure, you may think black and white is cheap, but think again when you find out these cameras record at millions of frames per second.
Camera's that shoot at over one megapixel (1024x1024) in color, over 3000 fps generally cost way over $10,000
StopMotionMind 1 year ago
this video shows temporary cavitation is real, and its efects. Faklers a fking idiot.
motlencore89 1 year ago
@ pahvi67... your poor quality
kingchizel 1 year ago
lol the golfball looked like it was blowing a kiss :D
MrAnonimusX 1 year ago
so why is it called bullet proof if the bullet will go through?
resdudeornardude 1 year ago
@resdudeornardude
The bullet stayed in the bullet proof.
peaceman859 1 year ago
@resdudeornardude
For the metal plates, if the ammunation is too powerfull the bullet will go throuh.
peaceman859 1 year ago
@resdudeornardude bullet proof vests aren't really bullet proof a better name for them is bullet resistant
RATCANCER17 1 year ago
lol gelatin was awesome
bros4broz 1 year ago
Very nice, well done video.
sully250r 1 year ago
just in reply to a few comments on here how can a slower bullet do more demage then a fast one providing they are two bullets of the same design basikally this would make a slingshot a more effective weapon it would also make it safer to get shot at point blank range than at a distance
SCOREPRODUCTIONS 1 year ago
so if rifles will only hit 3000 fps why does mine shoot 4100fps hell my deer rifle shoots over 3000fps
blufn4gonj 1 year ago
how mant fps?
TheNoisySpider1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i hate this music too
it's a eurotrash
Mihka 1 year ago
i hate this music
dabeatsfactory 1 year ago
0:27 looks like a cat.
rtm1137 2 years ago
what is the avrage speed of a bullet?
you78mas 2 years ago
Most pistols shoot @ 300-500 m per second (900-1500 ft).
Rifle bullets go from 700-950. Snipers sometimes 1100.
Noname9000000 2 years ago
what are you kidding me . most air rifles shoot 900-1000fps
338 win mag w/250grain np can have 2800fps at the muzzle
senapeed 2 years ago
Comment removed
cdtynes 2 years ago
Noname was quoting velocity in meters per second, not feet per second.
cdtynes 2 years ago
he was quoting both
senapeed 2 years ago
firstly, noname was using meters not feet in his post. second, a pistol bullet such as the colt 1911 45. only shoots around 900fps. its the size and mass of the round that makes it so deadly, not nessasarily speed
iissouthpaw 2 years ago
@iissouthpaw also the fact that at closer range, the slower FPS tend to do more damage because they don't "over penetrate" or whatever they call it.
VoodooGypsy 1 year ago
wish we had some people knowing what they are talking about on here...not talking about your airsoft guns buddy.
SpudBusterSAE 1 year ago
lol yep...didnt read the MPS ha sorry
SpudBusterSAE 1 year ago
METRIC FTW!!!
Mayb123 1 year ago
@Noname9000000 ya...in airsoft
SpudBusterSAE 1 year ago
@Noname9000000 LOL get some experience with "Real" guns before you go around posting crap on videos about "Real" firearms.
2142Unknown 10 months ago
handguns will go from 800fps to 1000fps.rifles will hit from 1000 up to 3000 depending on the cartridge and grain of the bullet
SpudBusterSAE 1 year ago
@SpudBusterSAE you're way out.
cam5533 1 year ago
@cam5533 the m1 garand shoots a .30cal (30.06) 150grain bullet with a muzzle velocity of 2800fps. my 11yr old nephew made the comment of 1000-3000fps, im here to back him up.
SpudBusterSAE 1 year ago
@cam5533 and the .223 has a muzzle velocity of 3110fps...
SpudBusterSAE 1 year ago
@cam5533 .50cal shoots at 2800fps..."you're way out" doesnt quite seem like an accurate description of my nephews knowledge of weapons.
SpudBusterSAE 1 year ago
@SpudBusterSAE You have no idea what you're talking about.
The most famous loading of the.357 S&W Magnum cartridge spits out a 125gr. bullet at 1500fps; even standard 9mm loadings are supersonic, with those most commonly encountered falling between 1200 and 1300fps.
Your 1000-3000fps range for rifles is equally absurd. Most far exceed 1000fps, and this has been the case with America's standard infantry rifles for more than 150yrs. Your ceiling suggests that you have never heard of 5.56x45mm.
predaking50ae 1 year ago
song?
Doopdon 2 years ago
madison park my personal moon
YTSTHEFAITH 2 years ago
how much is a camera like this?
MrMuscleMacho 2 years ago
I believe you would be looking at at least $5000 + dollars for a camera that does about 5000 fps. There is however the Casio EXF1, and theat takes 1200 fps. I believe they run around $1000.
minimorley22 2 years ago
but can u see bullits flying? with 1200?
MrMuscleMacho 2 years ago
@MrMuscleMacho yes, no, well sort of. if the camera films at 1200 frames per second and lets say a bullet travels arround 1200 feet per second, that would mean that the bullet would travel 1 foot every frame.
texabyte 2 years ago
smart one
MrMuscleMacho 2 years ago
my father got 400 fps one for 2000$
markfelix1000 2 years ago
sorry, 4000 fps one :D
markfelix1000 2 years ago
awesome where did he bought it
MrMuscleMacho 2 years ago
pixmania model no. is JVC GZ-HD7, i didn't know how to make a super slo-mo out of it. it had adjustable af and a full hd camera. it-s pretty nice. unfortunately my father sold it
markfelix1000 2 years ago
tnx man u helped me alot.
MrMuscleMacho 2 years ago
no -prob
markfelix1000 2 years ago
a Hummer H1 driving into a brich wall at 30 MPH all that force is asborbed through the human body and the force depends on the caliber of the gun IE .50 cal BMG would be equivelent to a hummer running into to a brick wall at 70MPH roughly
hpiownzilla01 2 years ago
You are a fucking idiot. If that were true, those guns would be unable to fire by a human because they would put that much force into the shooter. haha be real, a hummer at 70mph?
randomletterz 2 years ago
@randomletterz true. Momentum is a good way to judge recoil as well. 300 lb/feet (in a perfect world) would move a 300 lb. object one foot. Sounds pretty "real world" accurate for a .50 BMG recoil, doesn't it?
GriffGruff78 2 years ago
@hpiownzilla01 totally wrong. A hummer with a gross vehicle weight of over 10,000 lbs. traveling at roughly 105 feet/sec. has momentum of approximately 1.1 million lb./feet. A 650 grain .50 BMG slug moving at 3,000 feet/sec. has momentum of approximately 300 lb./feet. It isn't even "roughly" similar.
GriffGruff78 2 years ago
annnnnnnd pwnd.
randomletterz 2 years ago
none of you guys under stand, lets say you have a 9mm bullet , the cartrige is only 1 inch long the bullet its self only takes up 1/8th inch of the cartrige... most 9mm bullets have 23-34 grains of gun powder when the primer is ignited it burns the powder and gases created expands over 3,000 times its original volume thus forcing the projectile anywear from 1,100FPS- 7,800FPS much more than a human could everthrow push thrust whatever the amout of energy released from a gun equivelent to
hpiownzilla01 2 years ago
I've never seen a 9mm fire 7,800 fps before.
MissDaProach 2 years ago
probably a hydra shock bullet whcih were banned from indaho in the 90's they were made to go throught kevlar vest's but they were unbanned in early 2000's but they cost alot of money
hpiownzilla01 2 years ago
and i never said a 9mm did that
hpiownzilla01 2 years ago
Guys, it all comes down to kinetic energy, impact cross- section and target resistance. While the mass of a bullet is small, its speed is high (and speed goes into kinetic energy by the power of 2). Moreover, the cross-section of a bullet is very small, so the kinetic energy is delivered in a very small area. And lastly, the resistance to penetration determines (in addition to the hardness of the bullet) the depth of penetration. That's all there is.
dergelarste 2 years ago
we care y?
m2a3t2t3 2 years ago
Hey guys, what song is this?
Thanks
Larrye123 2 years ago
nice video. very good work. i search long for such a slomo video of bullets its rare. but wanna see am .50 bmg going trough a 3inch metal plate
marcmurc 2 years ago
Sweet movie. Search google for "Barnes Bullets Facebook" they have some amazing slow mo videos on there!
g4gbrooks 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually it is a well known fact that a well executed ninja star could travel faster than a bullet. It would have to be thrown from a TRAINED ninja though.
kloud51 2 years ago
its gun powder against muscle power...''its well known'' who wins...
bazengao 2 years ago
What do you mean, it's well known who wins? A bullet's worth of gunpowder has far less energy than someone's muscles can impart to an object; it just releases it much much faster and transfers it more efficiently.
pianoSpleen 2 years ago
do you at least understand the basics of phisiqs? how is possible some one over throw a granade blast with pure muscle power?? its insane! and for some reason people tend to die wen hitted by a bullet, that dos not happens on boxing challenges, you get hit by a punch and you go k.o. , if the punch was a bullet you would be dead.
bazengao 2 years ago
I think you're confusing kinetic energy with momentum. The gun-powder charge in a typical rifle puts out about 5 kJ(about as much energy as 0.3 g of sugar).
If humans were as efficient as a pistol at transfering energy to a bullet you'd need as much energy as an olympic level pole vaulter generates on the run-up to a jump just to launch one measily bullet.
soylentgreenb 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You're a fucking retard.
HiCapacity 2 years ago
No way. Bullets can travel at speeds of almost a mile per second. No way is any ninja throwing anything that fast.
musicphreek446 2 years ago
lol, it would mean his arm would have to fly thst fast too, dayum that's the first arm I ever saw that could travel at four times the speed of sound!
potheadpenguin 2 years ago
Now I see your problem. You have confused two issues I have addressed: slow bullet=large wound (which I said was wrong) and why the tennis ball reacted less when hit. Re-read my posts. And learn a bit about the physics of moving objects. It is obvious you know very little.
BTW, I may be quick to insult, but I do give my reasons. You insult without giving a reason.
SuperTbucket 2 years ago
actually the resistance remains the same, unless you discard the law of conservation of energy. which states energey can neither be created nor destroyed, and i only insult those who insult me, in which case, i can become nasty. I come across many internet geniuses, who google the subject and become instant gurus on the topic.
point in case, an object moving slower will cause more collateral damage. the resistance remains the same, but the inertia is lower, which causes the bullet to "shroom"
bmassa1 2 years ago
Dude, you REALLY do need to study up on basic physics before debating the subject. Resistance increases as the square of the velocity, you are one of those "internet geniuses", and a fast bullet will cause more damage than a slow one, i.e. .22 LR vs .22 short.
Seriously, though, find someone in your area who knows physics(an engineer, physicists, etc.) and ask them to explain it to you.
SuperTbucket 2 years ago
the card one is sick
vivera243 2 years ago
Wow you can see the bullet breaking the sound barrier.
uberL33tHaxzoor 2 years ago
POOR quality
pahvi67 2 years ago
Comment removed
Akira625 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shit quality
GR4YH47 2 years ago
Tennis ball is hollow. Not much mass to displace compared to the mass of the entire object.
Slower speed leaves a larger exit wound?? Guess again. Energy is en exponential product of velocity, more energy=larger wound. Less energy=smaller wound. Low enough energy=no exit.
SuperTbucket 2 years ago 3
but if the object has lost of vilocity and has a sharp point it will go right thorugh without spreading much energy
warhero296 2 years ago
The term "much" is relative. If two identical bullets are fired through identical mediums at different velocities the faster bullet will expend more energy to pass through than will the slower bullet. It's all very basic physics. The energy required by a projectile to pass through a medium, whether it be air, water, rubber, whatever, is a product of the drag induced by the medium and the velocity of the projectile SQUARED.
SuperTbucket 2 years ago
"en"? nice spelling =D
superatomic123 2 years ago
heh mr. physics over here.....I can tell you that you are completeley wrong my friend.
bmassa1 2 years ago
When telling someone they are wrong it is a good idea to tell them what they are wrong about and why. Don't be afraid to jump in and explain your point of view.
SuperTbucket 2 years ago
why explain it when you can just look it up on wiki...I'm not going to try and use fancy terms....my claims are based on pure experience. I live in the desert. I can go shooting anytime i like.
bmassa1 2 years ago
So what you are really saying is that you have no idea what you are talking about, you are just a troll.
Go away, troll. Go back to your hole.
SuperTbucket 2 years ago
if it makes yourself better, you can call me anything you like. I'm a highly educated person, with no need to prove myself to unsavory individuals.
bmassa1 2 years ago
Comment removed
bmassa1 2 years ago
Comment removed
SuperTbucket 2 years ago
Comment removed
bmassa1 2 years ago
An object traveling a a higher speed will have more resistance, not less. Unless you toss out Newton's laws. A dull knife causes more damage becuse it is dull not because it is slower. Like I said before, learn something about basic physics. This is a very simple concept.
As far as being quick to insult, I guess all those insults on other threads were made by someone using your name.
SuperTbucket 2 years ago
And I must admit it is pretty sad that you have to stalk my other comments to insult me. actually, it's kind of scary. you're quite childish for someone your age, vendictive, even.
bmassa1 2 years ago
@SuperTbucket I concur. I was shot at close range by an Exocet misslie. Think of the energy there, its little wonder it completely messed up my hair do. Mega strength hair gel for me next time i get in the way of a missile!
bigderekkeene 7 months ago
@SuperTbucket
dont forget the mass of a object
333Germane333 5 months ago
More material for the round to transfer energy, slower speed as well. for example a exit wound on a human is larger with a slower round
chrish2213 2 years ago
It's because the structure of the ball is very soft, so the bullet doesn't hit it hard, it just flys through
artanavicodin 2 years ago 2
funny how the tennis ball did not move at all when it got shot. i wonder why?
santaclaus0000000000 2 years ago
unlike the baseball and the golf ball the tennis ball doesn't have a core. same would happen if you shot an arrow through and empty box.
dogwarrior54 2 years ago
maybe because it's hollow and so light,golf ball and baseball are solid,more for the bullet to "grab" onto. : )
lickpots 2 years ago
Nice vid, when the bullet goes threw the ballistic gelantine
PwnedXPG 2 years ago
I wish I had a high speed camera.
dyikini 2 years ago 14
I wish I had an M-16!
allahtakesituptheass 2 years ago 2
@dyikini you can for $250
killeroftheshadows96 1 year ago
the ace looks cool <3
Schimml0rd 2 years ago
The baseball had to be the best part for sure at 2:53 It goes in sink perfectly with beat.......
killing4sport 2 years ago
Neat
SuperVarmintHunter 2 years ago
possibly one of the coolest videos on here
shams119 2 years ago
Tiny ass bullet
DEATHxValor 2 years ago
now THIS is gun porn....
thunderdome033 2 years ago 13
LOL!!!!
jtjjbannie 2 years ago
This video + music combination makes me feel at peace :D the soothing motion of guns and bullets to techno. Love it!
sjb167 2 years ago
Cool Video!!
bull1309 2 years ago
Brings new meaning to taking in the moment... Effin sick stuff there.
uilleann86 2 years ago
Hahaha Word!
xx0311xx 2 years ago
life is soo much cooler in slow motion
jugggernautttt 2 years ago 6
Should film the skies with these kind of cameras ;)
MrDevlance 2 years ago 10
why would someone want ot do that? it's allready slow enough as it is.
giurguvea 2 years ago 4
I dare you think deeper and see what I was hinting at. Somebody that gave me a thumb's up probably got it :D
MrDevlance 2 years ago
upskirt?
AwwYouFucker 2 years ago
cool name
thunderdome033 2 years ago
I wanna be the bullet !!! :)))
ronaldinho99999999 2 years ago 2
wish to not be in front of it
ungureanudoru 2 years ago 2
Great :-)
manfred05 2 years ago
1:23 was pretty cool! Nice vid
BubbyBoucher 2 years ago
at 0:27 it looks like an anime character...big hair, long chin, deep eyes, mad looking with a japanese wedding dress? am I the only seen this?!
JoseWiiSantos 2 years ago
o i see it haha i paused it and it tok me a bit
coooooooooooolio 2 years ago
lol good I'm not crazy
JoseWiiSantos 2 years ago
side ways
dustycavalier 2 years ago
haha omg
gammelfarmor 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
pause at 2.01.... FAIL!!!!
btw shit song
PatrickThatsMe 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your a shit song!!
bullfr0gz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
HAHA!! THAT IS SUCH A GOOD ONE DUDE. "YOUR A SHIT SONG!!!" HAHAHA
I FIND THAT ONE HILARIOUS!
ALSO IF YOU ARE TOO DUMB TO FIGURE IT OUT.... i'M BEING SARCASTIC!!!
PatrickThatsMe 2 years ago
Fantástico .. parem no minuto 26 parece uma mulher será Atenas?
Biloban 3 years ago
m16 is awesome
j0rdan1794 3 years ago
hows fps run camera?
21JuAnK12 3 years ago
Where can I buy a camera like this?
DirectCore 3 years ago
google it
theinsane102 3 years ago
EBay?
bAIRSOFTGUYd 3 years ago
Monkey?
ShawnSamLeahUsername 2 years ago
I want that camera!!!
SlaveZero1234 3 years ago 3
lol ill take the guns:)
banjoben1234 3 years ago 4
in that case i'll take the vest...
bloeregard 3 years ago 2
then I'll take the knife :)
banjoben1234 3 years ago 2
Oh then i´ll take the balistic gel
keeeeebab 3 years ago 2
i think i'll take the baseball
ChristofferKJ 3 years ago
i just need the ammo lol
Blitz54 3 years ago
haxor.
iamazn2000 3 years ago
bullet hitting the knife was awesome, knife wins?
SlavaVB 3 years ago
great, now that you posted that, some crazy mother fucker is going to go out on a killing spree and try to stop bullets with a sword because he thinks he's a jedi knight, and then come and sue Youtube for allowing such comments
lol, just kidding, but i recently heard a rather retarded story, and while this is unlikely, it could easily happen, and you konw what, i wouldnt be suprised if the guy won, such a sad sad world we live in . . . . :(
vigilante258 3 years ago 3
fantastyczne ujęcia szybkiej kamery, to jest niesamowite :)
Gravitancik 3 years ago
holy sh**
matthewbim10 3 years ago
I've had 3:57 happen under my bare foot
KAG8893 3 years ago
ive hade 2:24 happen in my hand
strawhalf 3 years ago
wow. you must be deaf
TGAcodes 3 years ago
i wasnt really conserned about that i was more conserned about my fingers
strawhalf 3 years ago 4
3:07-3:09 looks like the ball is in space lol
davver12 3 years ago
do bullets travel faster than sound??
steveirwins 3 years ago
Some do. They have to be moving at about 1120 feet per second or about 760 miles per hour.
fisherdoug 3 years ago 2
yes.. up to 4-5 times faster.
xayel 3 years ago
some.
thepilotboy 3 years ago
Some do some dont =^)
MosinNagant1891 3 years ago
umm... are u stupid??? how come some people who are sniped at long range are dead before they hear the sound of the gun???
bulletore 3 years ago
some do and some don't... that's the way it is...
streetstreetstreet 3 years ago
you may want to research 'sub-sonic ammunition' before you comment any further.
anzac3343 3 years ago
whats the song?
apx90 3 years ago
My Personal Moon (The Source's Trance By The Moon Mix) - Madison Park
olahansen 3 years ago 2
amazing
TGAcodes 3 years ago
well cool i love vids like this
reptileish 3 years ago
Cool video. Cool music too...made me want to dance.
Tazz77 3 years ago 2
Nice,i like the video
Jasi4L 3 years ago
May I ask what type of camera you used please. Gr8 shots. Thanks.
geniennis 3 years ago
idk the model but it most likel costs about 15 to 25 grand
UberCookieMonster 3 years ago
wow the m16 was epic
greatscottsham 3 years ago 3
who ever is shooting for this vid is an amazing shot and they way he hit the golf tee
Metal55676 3 years ago
it looks like zero gravity
Monochromonite 3 years ago
shawn ....the music was perfect for this kind of stuff like high speed shots.
JointLefty 3 years ago 4
this a wonderous spectacular vid
Camillionar911 3 years ago
lol at the m16 burst... i kept thinking it was on semi auto it was slowed down so much... cool vid!
aciagf 3 years ago 5
cool video, but the stupid music ruined it...
shawncindigabriel