Very cool! But I have one concern is that there only backup center or are the other locations. I'm interested in using Backblaze but would feel more secure knowing my data is backed up in multiple different locations like S3 I believe.
I think S3 and BackBlaze are sort of going after different markets.
The S3 storage, I believe, is highly redundant storage made to replace local storage, while the BackBlaze is really just supposed to be a second backup location to your storage.
So you would only really have to be worried if BackBlaze AND your computer went down before your stuff was synced. Some people are fine with the less redundancy of the backblaze cloud for the cheaper price.
Ahh 240p we meet again...
MinecraftCountry 1 week ago
Very cool! But I have one concern is that there only backup center or are the other locations. I'm interested in using Backblaze but would feel more secure knowing my data is backed up in multiple different locations like S3 I believe.
BlueDog599 10 months ago
@BlueDog599
I think S3 and BackBlaze are sort of going after different markets.
The S3 storage, I believe, is highly redundant storage made to replace local storage, while the BackBlaze is really just supposed to be a second backup location to your storage.
So you would only really have to be worried if BackBlaze AND your computer went down before your stuff was synced. Some people are fine with the less redundancy of the backblaze cloud for the cheaper price.
bergerlemur 1 month ago
"bootstrap" company - i.e. what used to be a normal company before the time rich investors burned their cash on unproven flights of fancy.
rpsxnu 10 months ago
the other companys seem more reliable and secure
lenoat702 1 year ago
67 tb pod, i could fill that up in a week LOL
MasterHasbar25 1 year ago
im a customer
AdonisRouse 1 year ago
How many customers do you have?
logistix111 2 years ago