nice video..but u shud have included that point he won against lopez in 2007..he hit a bakhand down the line pass on lope'z heavily sliced bakhand approach shot..that ws also magnificent.Roger's bakhand is world class on fast courts but on clay its a weakness...thats the main thing.
this video is stolen from the video called "federer backhand" dont rate me down this is true, and federer doenst have an exhibition with sampras, its the wimbledon match in 2001.
federer's main weapon is not his backhand, it is his forehand. He wipe around the ball and screw his opponents over. His backhand is his weakness, only good when you are hitting short balls.
uh no. Roger was a year and a half from his prime. Sampras was like 3 to 4 years past his prime and had suffered multiple injuries and wasnt training nearly as hard.
si roger federer hubiera jugado en la epoca de oro de pete sampras y con los jugadores de esa epoca jamas hubiera llegado a ser el # 1 ya que pete era invencible cuando jugaron en windledom el ya venia de un record increible y digan lo q digan hasta el dia de hoy pete sampras tiene el record de grand slam ganados a federer aun le quedan 2 por alcanzarlo federer es un excelente jugador que bueno haber visto a los dos genios del tennis en esta vida
dont you get it...roger federer fans see federer as a tennis god, and believe he is unbeatable. those are federer fans. everybody admires federer but knows he is just a human being, and is always feeling the same pressures as anyone else, and can be beaten.
Oh for the love of God, Federer has weaknesses, if you go to net, he's a dead duck, he has the power so if you stay on the baseline, you're a dead duck, but as soon as you rush the net you'll increase your chances of winning 10 fold, he can't run that fast, so drop a shot in front of the net and bam, point won, easier said that done I realize, but if you had the skill, that's how you'd beat Federer
Gracias a Dios por tener a dos genios del tennis y verlos jugar en nuestra epoca es estupido tratar de compararlos ya que no se puede decir que federer fue mejor que sampras por solo haberle ganado un unico juego en wimbledom ya que sampras venia de un largo desgaste como jugador es como decir que nadal es mejor que federer solo por haberle ganado un par de juegos creo que si pusieran una estatua del rey del tennis tendrian que ponerlos a los dos juntos
No es solo que Federer ganó este partido sino que tambien ha ganado 12 gland slam en 5 años es el jugador que ha sido el numero uno del mundo lo más tiempo consectutivo y en roland garros Federer ha llegado dos finales y sampras solo dos semifinales y tambien Federer tiene mucho más tiempo para hacer más geep. Gracias por su comentario.
Roger owns Pete! U guys are forgetting that Roger is still getting better every year.He has still yet to play his BEST tennis, scary thought! 3/4 GS titles this year, finalist in all. All 4 in 2008? Simply the Greatest even b4 his PRIME!!!!
Haha they played in different eras. and Sampras took 1 out of the 3 exhibition matches they played this year. Sampras is 35 and retired while Federer is 25 and at his peak.
Even though federer will be regarded as the best player ever, To say Federer owns Sampras is a drastic statement.
Yes, He can beat Sampras. Could he have when Sampras was in his prime, who knows... its impossible to tell. He by no means owns him though. You want talk about complete ownage. Talk about Federer over Roddick. Now that is owning. And a comment cant both be drastic and completely true. That would contradict itself
Though it is an excellent backhand, you would have to say it is the weakest part of his game. Especially when he has to take the ball up high on clay courts. That is how Nadal wears him down at the French. Relentlessly picking on his backhand side.
hahahaha I am an avid federer fan, but i agree.. the music is ridiculous. by the way, im surprised that you know the music which i did not and still dont recognize..
they just played. pete's still got it! hahaha but he obviously cant compete in terms of fitness and shot consistency with the current number one player in the world
There are no obscene comments... You're making yourself look silly by continually justifying the title of the video. Can you please explain to me how this is a Federer Sampras Exhibition match? I must be missing something, although I don't think it's me...
Mate, that's just stupid, and you're making yourself look silly with your ridiculous replies. This is NOT a Federer Sampras exhibition match. Change the title as it is very misleading.
Pffff, poor guy. You post the exact same video that was posted some time ago, but this time you put another title, maybe so that it could have more views or ratings. I'll give you one: 0 stars. And I'll warn the admins for the title. You pollute the internet.
this same exact video was posted 6 months ago, except it was titled "Federer Backhand". that vid is still up so why did you post this one? im confused...
nice video..but u shud have included that point he won against lopez in 2007..he hit a bakhand down the line pass on lope'z heavily sliced bakhand approach shot..that ws also magnificent.Roger's bakhand is world class on fast courts but on clay its a weakness...thats the main thing.
hasanmurad 3 years ago
that was fed then now his backhand is not a threat because he is slower now and isnt confident in it
blackknight1129 3 years ago
this video is stolen from the video called "federer backhand" dont rate me down this is true, and federer doenst have an exhibition with sampras, its the wimbledon match in 2001.
m0613525 3 years ago 11
i dont think its his weakness, its just that nowadayz he isnt hitting as many scorchers off that wing, and his forehand still does
RastafarianPikachu 3 years ago
nadal just proved fed backhand is crap
tradingbr 3 years ago
where you got that music from?
sharmario 3 years ago
where you got that music from?
sharmario 3 years ago
False title, asshole! I wanted to see Sampras-Federer.
Reedmylips7 3 years ago 4
federer's main weapon is not his backhand, it is his forehand. He wipe around the ball and screw his opponents over. His backhand is his weakness, only good when you are hitting short balls.
YaelGreen 3 years ago
Sampras just doesn't miss a shot. He might not be able to run to a corner shot, but his accuracy is unmatched (especially in his smashes)
Halochieftain117 3 years ago 2
uh no. Roger was a year and a half from his prime. Sampras was like 3 to 4 years past his prime and had suffered multiple injuries and wasnt training nearly as hard.
splendid1000 4 years ago
si roger federer hubiera jugado en la epoca de oro de pete sampras y con los jugadores de esa epoca jamas hubiera llegado a ser el # 1 ya que pete era invencible cuando jugaron en windledom el ya venia de un record increible y digan lo q digan hasta el dia de hoy pete sampras tiene el record de grand slam ganados a federer aun le quedan 2 por alcanzarlo federer es un excelente jugador que bueno haber visto a los dos genios del tennis en esta vida
Luthorcorplex 4 years ago
dont you get it...roger federer fans see federer as a tennis god, and believe he is unbeatable. those are federer fans. everybody admires federer but knows he is just a human being, and is always feeling the same pressures as anyone else, and can be beaten.
rockerduff1231 4 years ago 2
the only bad thing is this video is the background music, too corny and annoying.
janssenf 4 years ago
I'm laughing hard with the background music, it's so corny and annoying. hahaha
janssenf 4 years ago
Federer hasn't even reached his prime yet so what are you talking about? The man's still just in the middle of his career.
AAMLfan 4 years ago
U obviously dont know what prime means
splendid1000 4 years ago
Federer hasn't reached his prime yet. So what are you talking about?
The man's still just in the middle of his career.
AAMLfan 4 years ago
Oh for the love of God, Federer has weaknesses, if you go to net, he's a dead duck, he has the power so if you stay on the baseline, you're a dead duck, but as soon as you rush the net you'll increase your chances of winning 10 fold, he can't run that fast, so drop a shot in front of the net and bam, point won, easier said that done I realize, but if you had the skill, that's how you'd beat Federer
DwRScope 4 years ago
Sampras solo UNA vez llego a senifinal de roland garros, fue en 1996 perdiendo con kafelnikov, que a la postre seria el campeon de ese año
pistolslive 4 years ago
Gracias a Dios por tener a dos genios del tennis y verlos jugar en nuestra epoca es estupido tratar de compararlos ya que no se puede decir que federer fue mejor que sampras por solo haberle ganado un unico juego en wimbledom ya que sampras venia de un largo desgaste como jugador es como decir que nadal es mejor que federer solo por haberle ganado un par de juegos creo que si pusieran una estatua del rey del tennis tendrian que ponerlos a los dos juntos
Luthorcorplex 4 years ago
No es solo que Federer ganó este partido sino que tambien ha ganado 12 gland slam en 5 años es el jugador que ha sido el numero uno del mundo lo más tiempo consectutivo y en roland garros Federer ha llegado dos finales y sampras solo dos semifinales y tambien Federer tiene mucho más tiempo para hacer más geep. Gracias por su comentario.
Therunningrabbit 4 years ago
they are both great!!!!
josespul 4 years ago
Please stop and just jump. And have the mess cleaned by your parents; they're in fact responsible. Thx
55username55 4 years ago
Can somebody please get this guy the treatment he so desperately requires?
Therunningrabbit 4 years ago
Roger owns Pete! U guys are forgetting that Roger is still getting better every year.He has still yet to play his BEST tennis, scary thought! 3/4 GS titles this year, finalist in all. All 4 in 2008? Simply the Greatest even b4 his PRIME!!!!
Galactus247 4 years ago
whats the song called?
costas020287 4 years ago
Haha they played in different eras. and Sampras took 1 out of the 3 exhibition matches they played this year. Sampras is 35 and retired while Federer is 25 and at his peak.
Even though federer will be regarded as the best player ever, To say Federer owns Sampras is a drastic statement.
markhchristman 4 years ago
Drastic though it is it´s the truth
Therunningrabbit 4 years ago
Yes, He can beat Sampras. Could he have when Sampras was in his prime, who knows... its impossible to tell. He by no means owns him though. You want talk about complete ownage. Talk about Federer over Roddick. Now that is owning. And a comment cant both be drastic and completely true. That would contradict itself
markhchristman 4 years ago 2
keep dreaming, sampras in his prime would destroy fed on a fast surface.
splendid1000 4 years ago
and whats with this gay music? are you gay bro?
splendid1000 4 years ago
um...yea, why it the title Federer Sampras Exhibition match? it's real dumb to lie about ur video
shteek57 4 years ago
err... seemed like sm long forgotten chinese movie ... can do better!!
utsavsarkar90 4 years ago
your choice of music is ugly.
Stop misleading people with your false video title, LIAR
kchapfi 4 years ago 4
hey hey hey, liked this music soo and not bad vid, good job)))))))))))
whitemanzanilla 4 years ago
federer is the greatest player ever ... nobody can say anything about that
force4018 4 years ago
sampras still can, but time is drawing nigh.
teflonmagnet 4 years ago
way too cheesy
henrygfinn 4 years ago
Though it is an excellent backhand, you would have to say it is the weakest part of his game. Especially when he has to take the ball up high on clay courts. That is how Nadal wears him down at the French. Relentlessly picking on his backhand side.
ThailandKyle 4 years ago
hey "Therunningrabbit" his backhand is without a doubt his weakness. His backhand can't even be compared to his forehand. What a watse of my time
tennisnut3245 4 years ago
like the video but the music kinda sucks
musicgamer10 4 years ago
name of a song?
OBeymydreamz 4 years ago
Nobody is perfect, but as tennisplayer Roger
comes very close!
VolkersJohan 4 years ago
The song is "Nightingale" by YANNI......Though I strongly agree that it doesnt pertain to the video..
biniskarim 4 years ago
i am glad he (Federer) got a better haircut since!
annavivnapower 4 years ago
oh my lord. can anyone say glorification??
oh! and i second that comment by torgeistLLN.
sRod21 4 years ago
GAY MUSIC
edbiology 4 years ago
You know all Federer fans should check themselves for homosexuality. What's up with the Titanic music BTW?
TorgeistLLN 4 years ago
hahahaha I am an avid federer fan, but i agree.. the music is ridiculous. by the way, im surprised that you know the music which i did not and still dont recognize..
lsheen87 4 years ago
I did, and I found out that I'm married... with you o.O
Staunomat 4 years ago
just a buncha backhands lol
krp312 4 years ago
The match between the federer now n the sampras back then wasn't even close. Federer to win easily.
worksopians 4 years ago
they just played. pete's still got it! hahaha but he obviously cant compete in terms of fitness and shot consistency with the current number one player in the world
musicgamer10 4 years ago
stop using gay music for a great sport pls.
MarkusCallaway2006 4 years ago
this was NOT an exhibition match. this was an official match at wimbledon in the fourth round.
pokenova 4 years ago
Is the stupid dramatic music really necessary?
Gojiera 4 years ago
hahah! I agree! the dramatic music was not the smartest decision for this video.
alveeee 4 years ago
what is the name of the music please?
cestmoi974 4 years ago
look this
amazing!!
w'w'w(.)youtube(.)com/watch?v=5DUzDiNdsOk
andreg92 4 years ago
federer's backhand is the single most beautiful motion i've ever seen in all of tennis.
bhallic24 4 years ago 3
gasquet's is much better
texasfan58 4 years ago
federer the one and only perfect tennis player!!
he is THE tennisGOD!!!
Meisterdieb111 4 years ago
i don't think this video was that bad. Just misleading.
Mehdoozi 4 years ago
No human is perfect but your mum is haha
Rixxster 4 years ago
No effort involved and has nothing to do with Sampras. Next!
thombo1 4 years ago
good video rabbit!!
DiddysGirl25 4 years ago
Despite the lame title that got my attention, it is still a great video. Thanks for posting it.
jumba146 4 years ago
not only are are you a moron, you suck ass at making videos...this one blows.
sarge5000 4 years ago
You're clearly deluded. Keep running rabbit.
skillhead 4 years ago
change the title misleading...not a federer sampras match. they played once in wimbledon.
one1uv4ev3r 4 years ago
you are a fucking retard. this is a federer-sampras exhibition match...what the fuck.
sarge5000 4 years ago
There are no obscene comments... You're making yourself look silly by continually justifying the title of the video. Can you please explain to me how this is a Federer Sampras Exhibition match? I must be missing something, although I don't think it's me...
raiderjim 4 years ago
Mate, that's just stupid, and you're making yourself look silly with your ridiculous replies. This is NOT a Federer Sampras exhibition match. Change the title as it is very misleading.
raiderjim 4 years ago
What is it with the bollocks music attached to tennis videos? Fucking stupid.
skillhead 4 years ago
Pffff, poor guy. You post the exact same video that was posted some time ago, but this time you put another title, maybe so that it could have more views or ratings. I'll give you one: 0 stars. And I'll warn the admins for the title. You pollute the internet.
Pamqnx 4 years ago
i feel confident that the person who posted this video is clinically retarded. seriously.
sRod21 4 years ago
It is a fact! That it was not an exhibition match! And only a few points in the video is all about sampras! How could you argue about it?
cxyian 4 years ago
sampras losses the point, and it was not an exhibition match!
cxyian 4 years ago
this same exact video was posted 6 months ago, except it was titled "Federer Backhand". that vid is still up so why did you post this one? im confused...
rvaid03 4 years ago
is this related to sampras??????
cxyian 4 years ago
Brilliant match!
ilgattofelice 4 years ago