corporate elites dont want you to see the stories featured on CHANNELEDKNOWLEDGE:ORG.. why else would the mainstream media choose to ignore such interesting stories..? check out our archive and see for yourself..
@MoFugga17 So, a tourist in the US or someone working on a green card can, say, be thrown into prison without a trial because they are not a citizen? You may wish to deny any rights to non-citizens (and you have every right to hold that frankly revolting opinion) but good luck finding a single US court that will agree with you on it.
They read the constitution like they read their bible.....they only recognize the bits that they like and even interpret those to spin to their own advantage
when the constitution was written, AMERICANS were the only people our founding fathers were talking about. If you aren't a citizen, arent paying taxes, and are basically burdening our economic system with your very presence, then, no, you get NO RIGHTS here. Wow, you libtards are really stupid....
Where is the proof for your claim about the intention of the founding fathers? They used the words citizen and person in the constitution and in the Bill of Rights, but in the decisive parts that handled basic human rights, they used the word person! [...]
Finally think about a normal tourist that visits the US for his/her vacation and becomes suspected of having violated the law. Do you really want to tell me that he does not have the rights that are written down in the constitution and in the BIll of Rights?
So your statement is clearly made up out of nothing!
But what should be expected from somebody who uses words like libtard. LOL
the bitch uses he special needs child to get sympathy which no one should give her. she deniese that child a good life and just fly him around using him. disgusting woman if you could even call her that.
This woman is so unbelievably dumb it is sad. Also, this patriotic rhetoric about soldiers fighting for freedom is false.
Soldiers are dying needlessly so that the military and the government can erode the civil liberties of everyone around the world, even American citizens, through The Patriot Act, indefinite detention and SOPA.
So called Conservatard Patriots seem to get off on the idea of military power. However it is destroying the world!
It's a wonder how she came this far. Recycling cute anecdotes for a bunch of Tea Party members, what a snooze-fest! Heaven forbid our President have KNOWLEDGE OF LAW. The fact that this woman was almost a heartbeat away from the presidency is frightening.
@AllKnowingCreator Two points. 1. The whole point of our judicial system is to prove that the accused is guilty of the crime they are accused of. This way we don't just start killing people because we think they are terrorists. 2. Considering the fact you believe that the terrorists hate our freedoms and way of life and that's why they are attacking us, you probably should go out and learn something. Don't be a sheepy.
people can smash palin all they want, she should have stayed with the beauty and miss w/e comps and it seems that is all the ammo he has,,, id rather commit a crime or smoke a joint USA ENGLAND AUSTRALIA etc etc anyday.... u get the death penalty in alot of other places if you had a large amount.. let alone terrorism, lined up and shot up... pointless clip if your looking for one i just like watching how stupid palin is her face u can tell she hasn't read or cant remember next to anything! Lol
For once I agree with a republican... These people do not deserve my tax dollars to pay for their lawyer... Do we get these rights in their country? No... this guy is a moron It is like the term illegal alien what part of illegal don't people get. These terrorist deserve a military tribunal. All you liberal tree hugging dog killing idiots need to realize we live in a world where people want to kill your children and we need to protect them. This is how you protect them..
Go and read something about folks who have been caught innocent and brought to GITMO!
You are confusing some serious issues here! No one denies that criminals should get a penalty for their crimes. But therefore there need to be serious evidences that he/she is a crinmal and found guilty by a jugde. Otherwise you open a very big door for possible abuse of power by those who should jugde them without a trial.
@Mallorca10100 Go read about how Americans are treated in foreign countries under their "legal" system , if you can even call it that. The constitution defined citizenship for a reason. We cannot have a sovereign nation if we allow foreigners to just waltz in and demand our protections and then waltz out when they please. That's why we have a path to citizenship and protections for being a citizen, our bill of rights. Not a citizen, oh well , time to go to your home country then.
So, do you want to descend to their level? There are enough countries in the world where everyone is treated equally!
You read the fifth amendment of your constitution, didn´t you? So tell me about the second word, that is used in that amendment! As LiberalViewer explains in this video, it is the word person, not the word citizen!
Dunno why it was built and I don't care. The most the "terrorists" should have received were protections under the geneva convention, but nothing close to the rights under our bill of rights. A military court could decide their fate . The end. As for the illegal immigrant question. Go see what happens when you cross the boarders of other countries illegally. Iran, Iraq and so on will jail you immediately. Japan and other nations deport you. Grow up. Liberal child.
Insults are absolutely unnecessary and don´t help your argument at all! This has nothing to do with political opinion, but about legal facts. it is written down pretty clear what I have already mentioned. You should think about the question, if that this camp was not within the US, because it might violate your constitution.
So you compare your country to countries like Iran or Iraq? Really interesting.
@Mallorca10100 I don't want a free ticket for anyone who crosses our border, that's number one. It is perfectly fine to keep our nation secure with a secure border and to evict , jail or execute those who would willing invade our soil. A nation that willing allows its citizens to subvert another nations borders and border security is committing an act of war. We should invade mexico and do some nation building there. See how they like it. The war would last 3 days tops.
Why are we even talkingg about immigration? This is about the rule of law! If you threat American suspects of crimes in another way than foreigners you put your countries rule of law on its head! Period!
@Mallorca10100 You liberals are the reason I can't own an ak-47 full automatic rifle. You nit pick the wording and not the spirit of the amendment. We were never meant to be the armpit of the world were all the refugees and vagrant trash flocked to in order to get welfare. There is a citizenship process for a reason, citizenship requirements are laid out in the 14th amendment and you lose. End of argument, no citizen , no rights. Period.
@Mallorca10100 And further, if the founders wanted everyone to automatically be a citizen they never would have added what they did in the 14th amendment. They used people, and person, as a generic term. Rather than saying, men, woman, or "only persons who are white" . Don't forget for census reasons blacks only counted as 1/4 person and Indians not at all. Should we bring that back too? It is written therefore it must be so.You're an idiot. Conversation, if you call it that, over
But what should be expected by somebody like you who wrote such a comment. Your insult, stupid prejudices of liberals and your remark took away all your creditbility.
Note the comment from Ron Paul about a closely related topic, he once made in a debate.
@The1bassfreak We don't get these rights in CERTAIN other countries because they don't have the same principles as us, if you want to live in a country that works for its own good instead of the common good go ahead and leave.
Well as I mentioned the president of the all mighty usa is one of these important someones, so I dont see the egocentric point in that, given that Im a german. Raoul Castro also doesnt listen to her.. And as I also mentioned, if I was one of the great citizens of the last frontier, I would be pretty pissed. So I really dont see your point, Vmprki. In this spirit, Merry Christmas!
Oh wow, trailer trash is talking trash, big suprise!! I have to ask something too: Does anyone care, what that Alaskan redneck is blabbering?? I mean, anyone who is important??? I didnt think so..
@Garfuck The problem is that a lot of people support her not realizing the implications and that is just wrong. People need to hear these things then realize the futile nature of such support.
@nanaforiod Yeah I understand that, I was viewing it from a global point of view. Im from germany and I think Sarah Palin will never be powerful enough to have an impact on my life, like the US president has for example, just with global politics that effect everyone. But if I was an Alaskan, I would be pissed about her being my goveneur. So from that point of view, I very much agree with you.
@Garfuck You should care that this "blabbering Alaskan redneck" almost became a vice president (possible president) in this country... And your last statement implies that you think you are a big deal...when, trust me, you aren't.
Depending on one's definition of important... Sarah Palin is more important than you. At least we all know who she is.
@Vampyrekai Yeah she almost became.. almost.. Youre almost smart, doesnt mean you'll ever be, no matter how hard you try. So dont talk big deal bullshit with me, you couldnt rate me, even if I told you what to say, so shut the fuck up. I was agreeing with tghat guy so if theres a problem, maybe he should answer instead of some brainless motherfucker.
@Garfuck I couldn't "rate" you? I don't think I want to. You resort to petty insults far too quickly, friend. It leads one to assume you're the pugnacious sort who lacks a vocabulary. I was simply commenting on your "anyone who is important" statement and its egocentric implications.
There's valid points about Sarah Palin, but then it's expanded to represent all conservatives which is a argumentative fallacy. Sarah Palin's views don't even necessarily reflect all Tea Party views, for example those of Rand Paul.
Its the U.S. Constitution which means that it governs These United States. Just because it uses the word people instead of citizens doesnt mean it was meant to govern the whole world. People not OF this country or choosing to live IN this country are not subject to U.S. Rights just as they are not subject to U.S. laws.
Well our Country is over 200 years old and the bible which was written in England before being brought over to the USA by the founding fathers, isn't that much older. So Yes God is very possibly an American. Just because he was born British doesn't mean that he is. People forget that George Washington was born in England.
@angels77100 1) The Bible was writen between 4000 to 1800 years ago, and was compieled as a single book by the 2nd Episcale Conference in 240 AD. The Kings James Bible is an English translation of the Bible writen in Camberage Englend between 1588 to1646.
2) George Washington was born on Feb. 11, 1731 in Pope's Creek Estate, Colonial Beach, Westmorland Virginia.
What Student Loans if there would be NO jobs for you -students- when you graduated ???".
By the time you -students- graduated there would be no jobs because Obama have bankrupt USA then through unwise loans to companies like Solynda[$535 MILLIONS] that went bankrupt. How many such loans were given since then?
Does Obama have any vested interests in these companies that received such loans?
Is STUDENT LOAN a gimmick to gain the student's votes in the next election?
It is liars like you THAT HAVE NO QUALM ABOUT LYING TO COVER THE TRUTH to project falsehood.
God say in Revelation 21:8 that ALL LIARS GO TO HELL UPON DEATH TO AWAIT SENTENCE INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE.
Liars lie to hide the truth that they do not want the foolish black American & liberal to know as these liars have covetous agenda to hijack America into socialism so that a small group of covetous politicians could be very rich people
@explainingwhy RE: "God say in Revelation 21:8 that ALL LIARS GO TO HELL UPON DEATH TO AWAIT SENTENCE INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE."
I don't think I could send someone I love into a lake of fire. Especially if it was someone whom I had created. Gods love is definitely a tough love huh?
do they have much rights though...? ...government tells them who to fuck (till recently even how to fuck them), when to drink alcohol, what they are allowed to consume (no drugs) and i am sure i am missing lots of other rights americans just do not have...
@TheYouwontgetit Well, you wouldn't be allowed to have sex with a minor because they are both mentally and physically undeveloped, and as a fully developed adult you would be taking advantage of them. You can't drink alcohol in public or at work because that leads to indecency and being drunk either in public or at work. It should be obvious why that's bad. Were drugs legalized, it would be chaos. Were they taxed, the government would at least have the cash to repair the damage.
You would have to a fucking retarded not to knowing that, the USA constitution is only for American. wtf Liberals are like pedophiles., LiberalViewer you are a total retard. Why the fuck do you think in war criminals are tried in military court, and not civilian, fucking retards.
@TheDukeljk Hmm, so what your saying is, that all the times i've visited the U.S, i actualy had no right to life, or freedom by the US law? That any1 could kill me without any legal penalty, that i could go to prison for a crime i didn't commit without the right to defend myself?!? So basicly is "come here and we'll fucking kill u mothafucka!" right?
Thank god for those retards, or else i could have not made out of NYC alive...
as a note to all future movements, create a fake bullshit movement first, so the crazies can highjack that. Then move on to your real movement leaving them behind. learn from the teaparty
Sarah Palin just recently made an announcement that she would not be running for President of the United States. Why would she have to? Surely, no American would ever take for her to be President as being a serious option......ever, even though George W ya was elected twice. How can people listen to this grade school nonsense?
Sarah Palin just recently made an anouncement that she would not be running for President of the United States. Why would she have to?Surely, no American would ever take for her to be President as being a serious option......ever, even though Goerge W ya was elected twice.
Sarah Palin is a Neo-Conservative, not a Conservative. She's a very dangerous person who espouses a political ideaology that is based on the teachings of the Nazis and Leon Trotsky.
Ok, so people identified as terrorist do not fall under the Constitution. Do you know what that implies? if you don't subject a terrorist to trial before determining he or she is a terrorist, then how does the US decide who is a terrorist and who isnt? That means once US administration decide that YOU'RE a terrorist, then you're a terrorist! You see the logical fallacy here? EVERYONE, including American citizens, are vulnerable to such a ruling! There is no more "innocent before proven guilty".
Terrorists are classified as Enemy combatants unless they surrender in which case they become prisoners or war under President Obama's juristiction and standing executive order under what partial Martial Law that has existed since 9-11
US Constitution doesnt apply to them but Geneva Convention does
ok...well.....you're entitled to play on you tube. I love how people play bits and pieces of clips. Now, I'm not a big fan of Palin but she isn't completly wrong. In the U.S. the constitution should apply to the citizens of the U.S....illegals should not be entitled to our rights. And Terrorists?? Anyone that says they are entitled to rights should be labeled a trader to our country!
@tinaw1969 but that is the hypocrisy it is in the constitution with wording "person" not "American" sure terrorists are bad but who is to say we aren't one by trying to police the world? The greatest curse and blessing as a human is the fact you can be a shining beacon of hope and kindness or cruelty and despair, always something to change or improve. You have be willing to make that change.
The Zionist plan is trot Palin out, seize upon the "idiot" part of the conservative vote. Jessie Jackson in "white face". It isn't the left or the right. It is Zionist controlling all of the media darlings to confuse the public just enough so any honest conservative that knows our Constitution and what our founders meant by limited government don't get the chance to be heard over all of the manufactured phony political theater starring Palin, Perry, Romney and Bachman. Think for yourself.
@trose22s Then you clearly do not understand the overarching context of this video, though it was well-explained. The question of whether non-citizens are awarded protection under the Constitution isn't "ONE sentence twisted into controversial BS." It's a real problem that a lot of real conservatives really do not understand.
@LeaningTowardsPisa The system that protects you was put in place by citizens for citizens. You are guaranteed certain Human Rights, you are not equal under the law if you are not a citizen, you are not a "PEER". You can not ever sit on a Jury because of such, so no, you do not have equal rights of protection since you do not have the same responsibility of a citizen to sit on a Jury or perform other duties as required of citizens.
Constitutional Rights are guaranteed only to American citizens, HUMAN RIGHTS are guaranteed to everyone. Go protect some constitutional rights in Africa and see how far it gets you.
@lehman AWWWW, Context, like only Americans having American Rights and other Humans having Human rights as guaranteed to them. I don't think the founders were concerned about giving constitutional rights to Tories and other Brits.
@lehman No, I don't, just the same way that you don't talk about certain things throughout your life because they are assumed. All American law is based off of English Common law, the Magna Carta was a previous legal document that gave rights to the Nobility of England. The commoners at that time didn't have rights. They set up a system of peerage and jury trials, which is where all of our rights stem from, for a Jury can overturn corrupt law in court.
@Iguana1138 Why make assumptions when you have the bill of rights, case law, etc?
"peer means that you have the same rights"
aka why non-citizens get a jury trial as per the 6th amendment. ("...the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury...")
@lehman Also, being a peer means that you have the same rights, all citizens are guaranteed those rights because they have the responsibility to go to court and serve on a jury. All rights stem from the responsibilities that we share in this Union. If you do not share in those responsibilities in the protection of those rights you do not have legal protection under those rights. To do otherwise is to break the system, since no one would ever perform their duties.
@lehman Also, being a peer means that you have the same rights, all citizens are guaranteed those rights because they have the responsibility to go to court and serve on a jury. All rights stem from the responsibilities that we share in this Union. If you do not share in those responsibilities in the protection of those rights you do not have legal protection under those rights. To do otherwise is to break the system, since no one would ever perform their duties.
@Iguana1138 Please tell me you do realize all that rubbish you wrote doesn't make any sense. Here are some of the first words of the Declaration of Independance : "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." It's written MEN : it's not about citizens or peers, but f*cking HUMANS ! Whatever rights you think you have, from the Founding Fathers' own words, everyone has them. "Don't wanna be tortured ? Don't torture anyone, then !" It's no more complicated than that !
Please don't listen to the sorts of people that create these anti-Science Propoganda, they are so desperate to sway you to what they want you to believe, but they use lies and subdifuge to do this , Hitler did the same with the Jews.
Just find out for yourself , think for yourself , research what you don't know for yourself, do it !, empower you!.Don't leave it to people that are so scared of what they don't understand ...they will hold back mankind, .visit my channel , no conversion required.
@IHATEATHEIST2 The photogenically ignorant appealing to the ignorant masses.
Because religion gives answers rather than asking you to ask questions, it will always be a retarder of social development. Think about it, the Teabaggers don't want America to go forward, they want it to go back to old values. Well old values were riddled with segregation & intolerance. If the US wants to lead then it should be striving to lead us forward, not backwards into the Middle Ages!
I agree , if you the US want the world to see them as " the World Police" then they should put their own house in order first , before preaching to the rest of the world , glass houses and all that.
And over the years its becoming more and more evident. Mostly because the parties are forced to have such stupid people that support their views run as candidates.
@falconmann007, Is that seriously all you got out of that reading of the Constitution? It boggles my mind that there is this roadblock that it seems a lot of people-who talk just like you-can't seem to get past. Which is the fear-mongering. Can you tell me which founding father said that "Those who are willing to sacrifice freedom for safety deserve neither?"
If you start giving rights to some and not all, you have a got a massively fucked up, one-sided system. In regard to terrorists, think the criminal idea "innocent until proven guilty". If terrorists don't have any rights as human beings, you'd better trust the government one hell of a lot to say who's a terrorist. If the government doesn't like you or your ideas: you are a terrorist, not "worthy" of rights. We can torture and have you disappear, because you are not human.
The reason the constitution never mentioned that the rights are offered to citizens is because the constitution only applies to legal residents of the united states. The constitution doesn't mean anything at all in another country, and doesn't have any affect at all on a citizen of another country, if you feel we should offer all people the same rights we have under the constitution that means you support America forcing our ideals and our constitution on other countries.
@mynameismatt2010 The point of giving everyone and anyone on American soil the protection of our Constitution and Bill of Rights is to ensure that a due process of law is followed and that a fair ruling is made. Believing that a person, no matter who they are, deserves a fair chance in court is something that any logical person should stand for. If we didn't blanket the people with equal rights that means that our court systems would be hypocritical and corrupted. You fucking idiot.
@justiceforpoets The constitution doesn't apply to everyone on US soil. It is as illegal for an illegal immigrant to have a gun here as it is for him to be in this country. The purpose of the constitution is not to protect everyone in America from the governments of the world, it is meant to protect the people of America from the government that it founded. There is nothing hypocritical about giving equal access to the rights in the contitution to Americans and not to people of other countries.
@mynameismatt2010 facepalm* i cant believe you're this fucking stupid i read your arguements and all i have to ask is why are you still alive? "it is as illegal for an illegal immigrant to have a gun" so what is the 2nd amendment? if you read it then you know the 2nd amendment is not just for american citizens but for all people because it doesnt specifically state anyone but speaks in general and IT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. learn2constitution before you argue about it!
@griffinbird123 Ok, go give an illegal immigrant a gun and let the cops see him with it, i wonder how fast he'll get arrested for illegal possesion of a firearm. I know the constitution back to front and back again, i'm studying to be a constitutional lawyer. If you think it's legal for an illegal immigrant to have a gun why do you have to prove citizenship before you can legally buy on? The answer is that the constitution only applies to people here legally.
@mynameismatt2010 first of all i cant respect the fact that we have laws against immigrants when this country was found on that basis and another thing revert back to my previous comment and read once more. now I've been to many shops up here in ohio and I've never been asked for citizenship. Not even social some states differ but like i said in my previous SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED yet it happens alot especially by people like you PERIOD.
@griffinbird123 The country was never founded on everyone coming here regardless of where you're from, and there are no laws against immigration, only against illegal immigration. When you were coming over during and after th revolutionary war you were coming through elise isle and you HAD to sign the book, you HAD to pay the $5, and you HAD to be able to do this BEFORE you got on the boat, if you couldn't then you didnt get in. and when it became possible to come on the west coast Angle island.
@mynameismatt2010 oh and obviously you haven't read the constitution close enough either and a cop will still arrest you for carrying a gun anyways nowadays legal or not!
@mynameismatt2010 so what you're saying is, everyone is equal, but in America, American citizens are more equal than others. Hmmm where had i heard that before? Oh yeah, Animal Farm. See where your logic is heading towards?
@chou040195 Actually what i'm saying is that everyone is equal, but America's only responsibility is to make sure that Americans are treated that way, and since America is failing so hard at even doing that, with all of the anti men anti white crap being put in place, do you really think we can effectively do it for everyone else anyway?
@mynameismatt2010 What exactly anti-white anti-male has been done say..in the last 10 years? I'm curious as to what you, as a white male, were able to do before, but not now due to changes in the law?
I'm asking as another white male. Please, humor me.
@phuturephunk Well, i'm only 19 so i can't tell you what has changed in 10 years out of my own experience, but i know this, white males are something like 3% less likely to get into a university than an equally qualified black woman. Idk if the 3% is up to date, but that's how it was in 2009 when i was appling for college. You are more likely to get a government job if you're a minority than a white man, plus look at alimony law, that's so beyond sexist it's hard to accept that it's real.
@mynameismatt2010 That's fine from a statistic perspective, but none of that is actually codified into law. For the college stat you cited, does this control for all other races? What was the methodology? Fun Fact: In California there's an overwhelming bias towards asians due to their high grades over every other ethic/race group out there, food for thought.
Where are you more likely to get a government job if you're a minority? I've been involved with machine politics for years and can >>
And I can tell you that there still is a very distinct bias towards white males. This again, depends on the municipality in question...but all this is moot.
I want a concrete example where you, as a white male, were singled out because of your whiteness and treated unfairly due to a law specifically targeting you (as in the wording makes it clear, under no uncertain terms, that your specific race/gender combination are the target).
I'll save you time and say you're not going to find one.
@phuturephunk You seem to live in a very different world than i do, come to southern california, you'll see just how biased towards white males the justice system is. You want a law specifically designated to favor woman, alimony law. You want a law that specifically favors minorities, welfare and other social programs. Other examples of how government funding is used in a bias against white men, black women are ten times more likely to recieve a pell grant when they apply than a white man is.
@mynameismatt2010 Here's the basic gist behind Pell Grants (I work in education): This grant requires that each applicant is: an undergraduate student who has not yet earned a bachelor’s degree, a United States citizen or an eligible non-citizen, has a high school diploma or a GED or can demonstrate the ability to benefit from the program.
I don't see race mentioned there..
Alimony law has always tended to side with the mother, which should be corrected. This is not hard coded into law >>
..but rather how JUDGES in family court tend to rule. Again, find me where it is CODIFIED INTO LAW that they have to side with the mother? You're not going to find it..
Welfare and other social programs are completely based on income. Completely.
Again, not to be short with you, but you're displaying an incredible amount of ignorance when it comes to what the law actually says.
This is especially true with that welfare statement. It reaks of you having been sheltered all your life.
@phuturephunk Actually, i never said any of that was word for word " blacks get more benefits than whites: because they can't do that, but there are tendencies in the law to FAVOR non white non male citizens. And if Welfare is completey based on income why can't my father with no income for 2 years get welfare but a mexican working full rime at minimum wage can? My mom, no income can't get food stamps, my coworker has foodstamps and he gets over minimum wage. Like i said before, just because
@phuturephunk Something is not written clearly in a law that doesn't mean that the law doesn't have the effect of discrimination. As to pell grants, my sister was claimed under my mom who has no income, and was denied twice for a pell grant, yet my mexican girlfriends younger sister who was claimed under her dad while he was making over 100k a year and she got a max grant. Alimony law is actually written to favor women, at least in California.
@phuturephunk Also, here's a true story about my dad, he graduated from the police academy at the top of his class sometime in the mid 80's and applied to the LA police department along with a black girl who barely graduated and the third or fourth ranked guy from his class, neither of the well qualified white guys got the job but the barely qualified black woman did. I could go on with other stories, but it's pointless. The fact is that even though affirmative action is illegal it hasn't ended.
@mynameismatt2010 "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," Source: The 14th Amendment.
@justiceforpoets I think that when you read the part, "within its jurisdiction" you were thinking lalalalala to drown out the part of your own source that provides evidence that i'm right.
@mynameismatt2010 LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL. Google the following court cases.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886); Wong Wing v. U.S. (1896);
Plyler v. Doe (1982);
"While illegal aliens do not enjoy all of the rights granted to citizens by the Constitution.. In final analysis, the courts have ruled that, while they are within the borders of the United States, illegal aliens are granted the same fundamental, undeniable constitutional rights granted to all Americans." Refrain from stupidity matt.
@justiceforpoets Yes, because a few judges say the Constitution means something that obviously means it's true. You probably think that judicial review is also constitutional. If you don't know how to literally interprete the Constitution then there is no need to reply.
As to the quote, if that were entirely true then we should allow illegal aliens to vote, because that is an unalienable right offered to citizens by the Constitution.
@mynameismatt2010 How can you take a document written 200years ago literally when it was written within the context of the time? That's like saying "i read the bible, and a talking bush SERIOUSLY talked to moses." That's literalism in action. Interpretations change with the times because the context changes. You sir are an idiot, I will no longer be responding to you or your ignorant attacks on the freedoms that anyone deserves regardless of race, creed, or nationality. Fuck off and die.
@justiceforpoets There is no reason to assume that what was written 200 years ago doesn't apply now. Literal interpretation or no Constitution, those are the only options. Look at the Bible, since you brought it up, there are hundreds of different interpretations and that leads to vastly different ideals because people think it means anything other than what it said. Unless it is said that something is a parable or a story in the bible, a real believer should assume it happened.
@mynameismatt2010 You have gone full on retarded. You actually believe the bible is word-for-word real? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy shit i cant believe i even tried to convey any kind of logic, good night sir.
@justiceforpoets I said people who believe the bible must either believe it means exactly what it says, or accept that they don't really believe the bible. Just because you have contempt for Christianity that doesn't make the Constitution less applicable. It was written with precise wording to be followed precisely, anyone who's taken even a community college history class would know that. You don't even have very good reading skills yet you are trying to talk to me about logic? Just stop.
@justiceforpoets And as to the burning bush that your brought up. Since it also says in the bible that a man can't look at gods face without being changed it stands to reason that the burning bush was a proxy for god so that he could directly communicate with moses, unless you think that is beyond gods power, in which case you have no reason to be bringing the bible up because you are obviously not a Christian and will pull the same move every athiest tries when facing someone smarter than them.
The Constitution refers to "the people..." in the Fourth Amendment (and other places) with respect to unreasonable searches and seizures. There are some judges (though nothing binding) who theorize that there's a difference between rights for "the people" and those for any "person" identified in the Constitution. The DOJ believes that the 4th Amendment covers illegal aliens so it's unlikely that any court will draw a distinction. In any event, Palin is ignorant.
it is scary that sarah palin might possibly be the president of the united states. this is the scariest thing ever. imagine this ignorant narrow minded person running the most powerful country in the world?! its a horror movie.
@absba9 Politician's like her (Bush, etc), are why America will soon no longer be the most powerful country in the world. I don't like the Chinese communist party, but at least their leadership are sane and not bat-shit crazy like the republicans. I'll try to enjoy this last hurrah of sane, competent American leaders (i.e. Obama), before the nut-jobs take back control :( Hopefully, one day, US citizens will realise nut jobs only make things worse. I'll also remain thankful to be Australian :)
You're kidding, right? The U.S. constitution was made for Americans... If we should give enemy soldiers our rights, should we tax other countries? Oh wait, no that would be ridicul
This has been flagged as spam show
corporate elites dont want you to see the stories featured on CHANNELEDKNOWLEDGE:ORG.. why else would the mainstream media choose to ignore such interesting stories..? check out our archive and see for yourself..
ChanneledKnowledge 1 day ago
1: YES
2: No
MrYoshi411 2 weeks ago
i hope palin beck and oreilly die
sanderson9999 2 weeks ago
@sanderson9999 Me too man, me too!
xPSYKOxLIBBYx 1 week ago
@MoFugga17 So, a tourist in the US or someone working on a green card can, say, be thrown into prison without a trial because they are not a citizen? You may wish to deny any rights to non-citizens (and you have every right to hold that frankly revolting opinion) but good luck finding a single US court that will agree with you on it.
aziraphaleangel 1 month ago
stupid is, as stupid does. in the end, you can't fix stupid.
FadmanID 1 month ago
They read the constitution like they read their bible.....they only recognize the bits that they like and even interpret those to spin to their own advantage
kshackleton 1 month ago
when the constitution was written, AMERICANS were the only people our founding fathers were talking about. If you aren't a citizen, arent paying taxes, and are basically burdening our economic system with your very presence, then, no, you get NO RIGHTS here. Wow, you libtards are really stupid....
MoFugga17 1 month ago
@MoFugga17
Where is the proof for your claim about the intention of the founding fathers? They used the words citizen and person in the constitution and in the Bill of Rights, but in the decisive parts that handled basic human rights, they used the word person! [...]
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
Comment removed
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoFugga17
Finally think about a normal tourist that visits the US for his/her vacation and becomes suspected of having violated the law. Do you really want to tell me that he does not have the rights that are written down in the constitution and in the BIll of Rights?
So your statement is clearly made up out of nothing!
But what should be expected from somebody who uses words like libtard. LOL
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@MoFugga17
And by the way, Americans is a really spongy term, because people from Mexico, Brasil, Canada etc are Americans, too!
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@MoFugga17 maybe because we had to defend against the native indians who where attacking?!
mcdlover4 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
xPSYKOxLIBBYx 1 week ago
Comment removed
xPSYKOxLIBBYx 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mcdlover4 Even though you stole their land that they worked so hard for?! DOUBLE STANDARD!!!
xPSYKOxLIBBYx 1 week ago
the bitch uses he special needs child to get sympathy which no one should give her. she deniese that child a good life and just fly him around using him. disgusting woman if you could even call her that.
MrGladBEASTftw 1 month ago
This woman is so unbelievably dumb it is sad. Also, this patriotic rhetoric about soldiers fighting for freedom is false.
Soldiers are dying needlessly so that the military and the government can erode the civil liberties of everyone around the world, even American citizens, through The Patriot Act, indefinite detention and SOPA.
So called Conservatard Patriots seem to get off on the idea of military power. However it is destroying the world!
ec123456789able 1 month ago
Based on he final assertion.... maybe she is a closet morman?
MrFreezeframe666 1 month ago
It's a wonder how she came this far. Recycling cute anecdotes for a bunch of Tea Party members, what a snooze-fest! Heaven forbid our President have KNOWLEDGE OF LAW. The fact that this woman was almost a heartbeat away from the presidency is frightening.
thevanillabear4 1 month ago 9
@AllKnowingCreator Two points. 1. The whole point of our judicial system is to prove that the accused is guilty of the crime they are accused of. This way we don't just start killing people because we think they are terrorists. 2. Considering the fact you believe that the terrorists hate our freedoms and way of life and that's why they are attacking us, you probably should go out and learn something. Don't be a sheepy.
Vexas345 1 month ago
people can smash palin all they want, she should have stayed with the beauty and miss w/e comps and it seems that is all the ammo he has,,, id rather commit a crime or smoke a joint USA ENGLAND AUSTRALIA etc etc anyday.... u get the death penalty in alot of other places if you had a large amount.. let alone terrorism, lined up and shot up... pointless clip if your looking for one i just like watching how stupid palin is her face u can tell she hasn't read or cant remember next to anything! Lol
MrLazYSam 2 months ago
For once I agree with a republican... These people do not deserve my tax dollars to pay for their lawyer... Do we get these rights in their country? No... this guy is a moron It is like the term illegal alien what part of illegal don't people get. These terrorist deserve a military tribunal. All you liberal tree hugging dog killing idiots need to realize we live in a world where people want to kill your children and we need to protect them. This is how you protect them..
The1bassfreak 2 months ago
@The1bassfreak
Go and read something about folks who have been caught innocent and brought to GITMO!
You are confusing some serious issues here! No one denies that criminals should get a penalty for their crimes. But therefore there need to be serious evidences that he/she is a crinmal and found guilty by a jugde. Otherwise you open a very big door for possible abuse of power by those who should jugde them without a trial.
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@Mallorca10100 Go read about how Americans are treated in foreign countries under their "legal" system , if you can even call it that. The constitution defined citizenship for a reason. We cannot have a sovereign nation if we allow foreigners to just waltz in and demand our protections and then waltz out when they please. That's why we have a path to citizenship and protections for being a citizen, our bill of rights. Not a citizen, oh well , time to go to your home country then.
luckyglasspig 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig
So, do you want to descend to their level? There are enough countries in the world where everyone is treated equally!
You read the fifth amendment of your constitution, didn´t you? So tell me about the second word, that is used in that amendment! As LiberalViewer explains in this video, it is the word person, not the word citizen!
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
Dunno why it was built and I don't care. The most the "terrorists" should have received were protections under the geneva convention, but nothing close to the rights under our bill of rights. A military court could decide their fate . The end. As for the illegal immigrant question. Go see what happens when you cross the boarders of other countries illegally. Iran, Iraq and so on will jail you immediately. Japan and other nations deport you. Grow up. Liberal child.
luckyglasspig 1 month ago
Comment removed
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@luckyglasspig
Insults are absolutely unnecessary and don´t help your argument at all! This has nothing to do with political opinion, but about legal facts. it is written down pretty clear what I have already mentioned. You should think about the question, if that this camp was not within the US, because it might violate your constitution.
So you compare your country to countries like Iran or Iraq? Really interesting.
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig
Finally I would recommend the same thing to you that I have already said to others.
Watch this video very observantly, because the chain of reasoning that is made by LiberalViewer is irrefutable.
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@Mallorca10100 I don't want a free ticket for anyone who crosses our border, that's number one. It is perfectly fine to keep our nation secure with a secure border and to evict , jail or execute those who would willing invade our soil. A nation that willing allows its citizens to subvert another nations borders and border security is committing an act of war. We should invade mexico and do some nation building there. See how they like it. The war would last 3 days tops.
luckyglasspig 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig p
Why are we even talkingg about immigration? This is about the rule of law! If you threat American suspects of crimes in another way than foreigners you put your countries rule of law on its head! Period!
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig
Invade Mexio? LOL, what gives you the right to invade Mexico? Mexico is a sovereign nation that has not attacked the US.
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig ... As well as the word people is used in the 4th amendment....
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@Mallorca10100 You liberals are the reason I can't own an ak-47 full automatic rifle. You nit pick the wording and not the spirit of the amendment. We were never meant to be the armpit of the world were all the refugees and vagrant trash flocked to in order to get welfare. There is a citizenship process for a reason, citizenship requirements are laid out in the 14th amendment and you lose. End of argument, no citizen , no rights. Period.
luckyglasspig 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig no the amendment does not say citizen it says people,person you idiot. fucking redneck southern trash.
MrGladBEASTftw 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig
What are you talking about? Arrange your thoughts before you make strange comments like this!
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@Mallorca10100 And further, if the founders wanted everyone to automatically be a citizen they never would have added what they did in the 14th amendment. They used people, and person, as a generic term. Rather than saying, men, woman, or "only persons who are white" . Don't forget for census reasons blacks only counted as 1/4 person and Indians not at all. Should we bring that back too? It is written therefore it must be so.You're an idiot. Conversation, if you call it that, over
luckyglasspig 1 month ago
@luckyglasspig
I never said that founders wanted everyone to be a citizen! You should really read other people´s comments carefully, before you are about to answer!
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
Comment removed
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@luckyglasspig
So, why do you think the penitentiary was built on Guantanamo and not in the US itself?
In my country every person´s human rights are protected by the basic law, which was, by the way, approved by the US inter alia!
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@The1bassfreak
But what should be expected by somebody like you who wrote such a comment. Your insult, stupid prejudices of liberals and your remark took away all your creditbility.
Note the comment from Ron Paul about a closely related topic, he once made in a debate.
Mallorca10100 1 month ago
@The1bassfreak
And finally you should watch this video very observantly, because the chain of reasoning that is made by LiberalViewer is irrefutable.
Mallorca10100 1 month ago 13
@The1bassfreak We don't get these rights in CERTAIN other countries because they don't have the same principles as us, if you want to live in a country that works for its own good instead of the common good go ahead and leave.
Mets6986WSWins 1 month ago
Well as I mentioned the president of the all mighty usa is one of these important someones, so I dont see the egocentric point in that, given that Im a german. Raoul Castro also doesnt listen to her.. And as I also mentioned, if I was one of the great citizens of the last frontier, I would be pretty pissed. So I really dont see your point, Vmprki. In this spirit, Merry Christmas!
Garfuck 2 months ago
who else just watches the clips and skips the guy talking
EmmeMck 2 months ago
@EmmeMck Just you then...
nanaforiod 2 months ago
@EmmeMck I think it's just you, honestly. His commentary is very evenly delivered and quite on point.
phuturephunk 2 months ago
One mans terrorist is smothers freedom fighter
wrestlingpandas 2 months ago
Oh wow, trailer trash is talking trash, big suprise!! I have to ask something too: Does anyone care, what that Alaskan redneck is blabbering?? I mean, anyone who is important??? I didnt think so..
Garfuck 2 months ago
@Garfuck The problem is that a lot of people support her not realizing the implications and that is just wrong. People need to hear these things then realize the futile nature of such support.
nanaforiod 2 months ago
@nanaforiod Yeah I understand that, I was viewing it from a global point of view. Im from germany and I think Sarah Palin will never be powerful enough to have an impact on my life, like the US president has for example, just with global politics that effect everyone. But if I was an Alaskan, I would be pissed about her being my goveneur. So from that point of view, I very much agree with you.
Garfuck 2 months ago
@Garfuck You should care that this "blabbering Alaskan redneck" almost became a vice president (possible president) in this country... And your last statement implies that you think you are a big deal...when, trust me, you aren't.
Depending on one's definition of important... Sarah Palin is more important than you. At least we all know who she is.
Vampyrekai 2 months ago
@Vampyrekai Yeah she almost became.. almost.. Youre almost smart, doesnt mean you'll ever be, no matter how hard you try. So dont talk big deal bullshit with me, you couldnt rate me, even if I told you what to say, so shut the fuck up. I was agreeing with tghat guy so if theres a problem, maybe he should answer instead of some brainless motherfucker.
Garfuck 2 months ago
@Garfuck I couldn't "rate" you? I don't think I want to. You resort to petty insults far too quickly, friend. It leads one to assume you're the pugnacious sort who lacks a vocabulary. I was simply commenting on your "anyone who is important" statement and its egocentric implications.
Woosaah
Vampyrekai 2 months ago
Lol everyone in her audience is fat as fuck and 90 percent are old as fuck. Conservatives need to be more conservative about their diets.
guitarfuckist 2 months ago
ironically the practice of denying rights to prisoners that started with non American "terrorism detainees" has now been expanded to Americans.
Denying rights to non americans under US jurisdiction is always just a stepping stone.
booley 2 months ago
There's valid points about Sarah Palin, but then it's expanded to represent all conservatives which is a argumentative fallacy. Sarah Palin's views don't even necessarily reflect all Tea Party views, for example those of Rand Paul.
EnricCirne 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its the U.S. Constitution which means that it governs These United States. Just because it uses the word people instead of citizens doesnt mean it was meant to govern the whole world. People not OF this country or choosing to live IN this country are not subject to U.S. Rights just as they are not subject to U.S. laws.
mrmrhodes 3 months ago
Comment removed
mrmrhodes 3 months ago
A blind leading blinds!!!!
honcan69 3 months ago
The Republicans are now the fascist party.
TehFunnehMann 3 months ago
Well our Country is over 200 years old and the bible which was written in England before being brought over to the USA by the founding fathers, isn't that much older. So Yes God is very possibly an American. Just because he was born British doesn't mean that he is. People forget that George Washington was born in England.
angels77100 3 months ago
@angels77100 Please God tell me you're joking about that.
Cerridwen247 3 months ago
@angels77100 1) The Bible was writen between 4000 to 1800 years ago, and was compieled as a single book by the 2nd Episcale Conference in 240 AD. The Kings James Bible is an English translation of the Bible writen in Camberage Englend between 1588 to1646.
2) George Washington was born on Feb. 11, 1731 in Pope's Creek Estate, Colonial Beach, Westmorland Virginia.
Andrewcranky 3 months ago
Dude. I think YOU should run for president.
niceee50 3 months ago
Isn't it ironic that someone so willing to tout the wonders of our constitution when it suits them are so willing to ignore it when it suits them.
Ansonidak 3 months ago
@Ansonidak yeh it is my man but thats what you get from an hypocritical cow talkin out her ass pfft sill y sarah palin
ISMEY 3 months ago
Dear students,
What Student Loans if there would be NO jobs for you -students- when you graduated ???".
By the time you -students- graduated there would be no jobs because Obama have bankrupt USA then through unwise loans to companies like Solynda[$535 MILLIONS] that went bankrupt. How many such loans were given since then?
Does Obama have any vested interests in these companies that received such loans?
Is STUDENT LOAN a gimmick to gain the student's votes in the next election?
AMEN
explainingwhy 4 months ago
she's a puppet! for the highest bidder...
stevekach 4 months ago
@stevekach
It is liars like you THAT HAVE NO QUALM ABOUT LYING TO COVER THE TRUTH to project falsehood.
God say in Revelation 21:8 that ALL LIARS GO TO HELL UPON DEATH TO AWAIT SENTENCE INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE.
Liars lie to hide the truth that they do not want the foolish black American & liberal to know as these liars have covetous agenda to hijack America into socialism so that a small group of covetous politicians could be very rich people
Verify THE TRUTH: wwwFAITHFREEDOMorg
AMEN=TRULY
explainingwhy 4 months ago
@explainingwhy RE: "God say in Revelation 21:8 that ALL LIARS GO TO HELL UPON DEATH TO AWAIT SENTENCE INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE."
I don't think I could send someone I love into a lake of fire. Especially if it was someone whom I had created. Gods love is definitely a tough love huh?
Ansonidak 3 months ago
do they have much rights though...? ...government tells them who to fuck (till recently even how to fuck them), when to drink alcohol, what they are allowed to consume (no drugs) and i am sure i am missing lots of other rights americans just do not have...
TheYouwontgetit 4 months ago
@TheYouwontgetit Well, you wouldn't be allowed to have sex with a minor because they are both mentally and physically undeveloped, and as a fully developed adult you would be taking advantage of them. You can't drink alcohol in public or at work because that leads to indecency and being drunk either in public or at work. It should be obvious why that's bad. Were drugs legalized, it would be chaos. Were they taxed, the government would at least have the cash to repair the damage.
KornwallisTV 4 months ago
You would have to a fucking retarded not to knowing that, the USA constitution is only for American. wtf Liberals are like pedophiles., LiberalViewer you are a total retard. Why the fuck do you think in war criminals are tried in military court, and not civilian, fucking retards.
TheDukeljk 4 months ago
@TheDukeljk Hmm, so what your saying is, that all the times i've visited the U.S, i actualy had no right to life, or freedom by the US law? That any1 could kill me without any legal penalty, that i could go to prison for a crime i didn't commit without the right to defend myself?!? So basicly is "come here and we'll fucking kill u mothafucka!" right?
Thank god for those retards, or else i could have not made out of NYC alive...
lcg3092 4 months ago
as a note to all future movements, create a fake bullshit movement first, so the crazies can highjack that. Then move on to your real movement leaving them behind. learn from the teaparty
1Pantikian 4 months ago
Sarah Palin just recently made an announcement that she would not be running for President of the United States. Why would she have to? Surely, no American would ever take for her to be President as being a serious option......ever, even though George W ya was elected twice. How can people listen to this grade school nonsense?
tindallpe 4 months ago
Sarah Palin just recently made an anouncement that she would not be running for President of the United States. Why would she have to?Surely, no American would ever take for her to be President as being a serious option......ever, even though Goerge W ya was elected twice.
tindallpe 4 months ago
Sarah Palin is a Neo-Conservative, not a Conservative. She's a very dangerous person who espouses a political ideaology that is based on the teachings of the Nazis and Leon Trotsky.
waterhead001 4 months ago
I have actually seen American Christians (The fundamentalist ones) coming to my country and go as far as preaching that GOD is an American.
So I'm not surprised with Palin's view on God's citizenship.
tamenga88 4 months ago
Ok, so people identified as terrorist do not fall under the Constitution. Do you know what that implies? if you don't subject a terrorist to trial before determining he or she is a terrorist, then how does the US decide who is a terrorist and who isnt? That means once US administration decide that YOU'RE a terrorist, then you're a terrorist! You see the logical fallacy here? EVERYONE, including American citizens, are vulnerable to such a ruling! There is no more "innocent before proven guilty".
chou040195 4 months ago
I feel like people in the 1800s were much smarter than people today...
SlipknotFanize 4 months ago
Terrorists are classified as Enemy combatants unless they surrender in which case they become prisoners or war under President Obama's juristiction and standing executive order under what partial Martial Law that has existed since 9-11
US Constitution doesnt apply to them but Geneva Convention does
TheRealArchAngel 5 months ago
ok...well.....you're entitled to play on you tube. I love how people play bits and pieces of clips. Now, I'm not a big fan of Palin but she isn't completly wrong. In the U.S. the constitution should apply to the citizens of the U.S....illegals should not be entitled to our rights. And Terrorists?? Anyone that says they are entitled to rights should be labeled a trader to our country!
tinaw1969 5 months ago
@tinaw1969 but that is the hypocrisy it is in the constitution with wording "person" not "American" sure terrorists are bad but who is to say we aren't one by trying to police the world? The greatest curse and blessing as a human is the fact you can be a shining beacon of hope and kindness or cruelty and despair, always something to change or improve. You have be willing to make that change.
chromeshellking 4 months ago
@tinaw1969 Yes, "a trader." Because trading goods and betraying the nation are the same thing.
LakeOfCakes 4 months ago
Its amazing, stick America in a speech and wait for the standing applause.
knivesmcgraw 5 months ago
The Zionist plan is trot Palin out, seize upon the "idiot" part of the conservative vote. Jessie Jackson in "white face". It isn't the left or the right. It is Zionist controlling all of the media darlings to confuse the public just enough so any honest conservative that knows our Constitution and what our founders meant by limited government don't get the chance to be heard over all of the manufactured phony political theater starring Palin, Perry, Romney and Bachman. Think for yourself.
aubreyfarmer 5 months ago
@2020blackmagic yes and it keeps going back but over half america blames obama for something no one cant fix in 4 yrs.
2020blackmagic 5 months ago
@trose22s Then you clearly do not understand the overarching context of this video, though it was well-explained. The question of whether non-citizens are awarded protection under the Constitution isn't "ONE sentence twisted into controversial BS." It's a real problem that a lot of real conservatives really do not understand.
LeaningTowardsPisa 5 months ago
@LeaningTowardsPisa The system that protects you was put in place by citizens for citizens. You are guaranteed certain Human Rights, you are not equal under the law if you are not a citizen, you are not a "PEER". You can not ever sit on a Jury because of such, so no, you do not have equal rights of protection since you do not have the same responsibility of a citizen to sit on a Jury or perform other duties as required of citizens.
Iguana1138 5 months ago
Constitutional Rights are guaranteed only to American citizens, HUMAN RIGHTS are guaranteed to everyone. Go protect some constitutional rights in Africa and see how far it gets you.
Iguana1138 5 months ago
@Iguana1138 They apply to all people within context. I don't see where you're going bringing up US Constitutional Rights inside Africa.
lehman 5 months ago
@lehman AWWWW, Context, like only Americans having American Rights and other Humans having Human rights as guaranteed to them. I don't think the founders were concerned about giving constitutional rights to Tories and other Brits.
Iguana1138 5 months ago
@Iguana1138 Wouldn't the founders put that in the Constitution if what you think was what they were concerned with?
lehman 5 months ago
@lehman No, I don't, just the same way that you don't talk about certain things throughout your life because they are assumed. All American law is based off of English Common law, the Magna Carta was a previous legal document that gave rights to the Nobility of England. The commoners at that time didn't have rights. They set up a system of peerage and jury trials, which is where all of our rights stem from, for a Jury can overturn corrupt law in court.
Iguana1138 5 months ago
"because they are assumed."
@Iguana1138 Why make assumptions when you have the bill of rights, case law, etc?
"peer means that you have the same rights"
aka why non-citizens get a jury trial as per the 6th amendment. ("...the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury...")
lehman 5 months ago
@lehman Also, being a peer means that you have the same rights, all citizens are guaranteed those rights because they have the responsibility to go to court and serve on a jury. All rights stem from the responsibilities that we share in this Union. If you do not share in those responsibilities in the protection of those rights you do not have legal protection under those rights. To do otherwise is to break the system, since no one would ever perform their duties.
Iguana1138 5 months ago
@lehman Also, being a peer means that you have the same rights, all citizens are guaranteed those rights because they have the responsibility to go to court and serve on a jury. All rights stem from the responsibilities that we share in this Union. If you do not share in those responsibilities in the protection of those rights you do not have legal protection under those rights. To do otherwise is to break the system, since no one would ever perform their duties.
Iguana1138 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Iguana1138 Please tell me you do realize all that rubbish you wrote doesn't make any sense. Here are some of the first words of the Declaration of Independance : "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." It's written MEN : it's not about citizens or peers, but f*cking HUMANS ! Whatever rights you think you have, from the Founding Fathers' own words, everyone has them. "Don't wanna be tortured ? Don't torture anyone, then !" It's no more complicated than that !
OghmaticCraftAnimus 5 months ago
@Iguana1138 Did you even watch the video?
lehman 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lehman About a week ago
Iguana1138 5 months ago
Why was Community Channel in the suggestion box? lol
JoshuaAlexandre 5 months ago
Jesus Christ this Nazi cunt is worthy of ridicule nothing more. Palin is a prime example of why America is finished as a nation.
star50ify 5 months ago
@star50ify You know, when you say things like that it shows your level of intelligence and not her's.
Iguana1138 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please don't listen to the sorts of people that create these anti-Science Propoganda, they are so desperate to sway you to what they want you to believe, but they use lies and subdifuge to do this , Hitler did the same with the Jews.
Just find out for yourself , think for yourself , research what you don't know for yourself, do it !, empower you!.Don't leave it to people that are so scared of what they don't understand ...they will hold back mankind, .visit my channel , no conversion required.
IHATEATHEIST2 5 months ago
@IHATEATHEIST2 The photogenically ignorant appealing to the ignorant masses.
Because religion gives answers rather than asking you to ask questions, it will always be a retarder of social development. Think about it, the Teabaggers don't want America to go forward, they want it to go back to old values. Well old values were riddled with segregation & intolerance. If the US wants to lead then it should be striving to lead us forward, not backwards into the Middle Ages!
GuillemotWatcher 5 months ago
@GuillemotWatcher
I agree , if you the US want the world to see them as " the World Police" then they should put their own house in order first , before preaching to the rest of the world , glass houses and all that.
IHATEATHEIST2 5 months ago
@GuillemotWatcher
Here here .
IHATEATHEIST2 3 months ago
Having only two parties is wrong.
And over the years its becoming more and more evident. Mostly because the parties are forced to have such stupid people that support their views run as candidates.
SoulDevoured 5 months ago
@SoulDevoured We should have Zero Parties and only let people represent their constituency
Iguana1138 5 months ago
So.... you're protecting terrorists... that's cool.
falconmann007 5 months ago
@falconmann007, Is that seriously all you got out of that reading of the Constitution? It boggles my mind that there is this roadblock that it seems a lot of people-who talk just like you-can't seem to get past. Which is the fear-mongering. Can you tell me which founding father said that "Those who are willing to sacrifice freedom for safety deserve neither?"
I doubt it.
TheBoxingCannabyte 5 months ago
No black people in that room
fooloof 5 months ago
@fooloof lol Is it really that shocking, its only filled with rich white people?
TMBrd89 5 months ago
Terrorists are supposed to be treated as equils? What the fuck is your point dude?
gunniesack 5 months ago
@gunniesack
If you start giving rights to some and not all, you have a got a massively fucked up, one-sided system. In regard to terrorists, think the criminal idea "innocent until proven guilty". If terrorists don't have any rights as human beings, you'd better trust the government one hell of a lot to say who's a terrorist. If the government doesn't like you or your ideas: you are a terrorist, not "worthy" of rights. We can torture and have you disappear, because you are not human.
xLordOfTheFliesx 5 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 - We believe the Rights addressed in the Constitution are Rights ALL people have under our Creator.
It's amazing how many Americans don't understand this. The Founders claimed they were universal Rights. Human Rights.
CommonSense8102 6 months ago
@CommonSense8102 Article and section that reference, because i don't belief it's in the constitution at all.
mynameismatt2010 5 months ago
is she that stuipid
guitatac 6 months ago
The reason the constitution never mentioned that the rights are offered to citizens is because the constitution only applies to legal residents of the united states. The constitution doesn't mean anything at all in another country, and doesn't have any affect at all on a citizen of another country, if you feel we should offer all people the same rights we have under the constitution that means you support America forcing our ideals and our constitution on other countries.
mynameismatt2010 6 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 The point of giving everyone and anyone on American soil the protection of our Constitution and Bill of Rights is to ensure that a due process of law is followed and that a fair ruling is made. Believing that a person, no matter who they are, deserves a fair chance in court is something that any logical person should stand for. If we didn't blanket the people with equal rights that means that our court systems would be hypocritical and corrupted. You fucking idiot.
justiceforpoets 6 months ago
@justiceforpoets The constitution doesn't apply to everyone on US soil. It is as illegal for an illegal immigrant to have a gun here as it is for him to be in this country. The purpose of the constitution is not to protect everyone in America from the governments of the world, it is meant to protect the people of America from the government that it founded. There is nothing hypocritical about giving equal access to the rights in the contitution to Americans and not to people of other countries.
mynameismatt2010 6 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 facepalm* i cant believe you're this fucking stupid i read your arguements and all i have to ask is why are you still alive? "it is as illegal for an illegal immigrant to have a gun" so what is the 2nd amendment? if you read it then you know the 2nd amendment is not just for american citizens but for all people because it doesnt specifically state anyone but speaks in general and IT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. learn2constitution before you argue about it!
griffinbird123 5 months ago
@griffinbird123 Ok, go give an illegal immigrant a gun and let the cops see him with it, i wonder how fast he'll get arrested for illegal possesion of a firearm. I know the constitution back to front and back again, i'm studying to be a constitutional lawyer. If you think it's legal for an illegal immigrant to have a gun why do you have to prove citizenship before you can legally buy on? The answer is that the constitution only applies to people here legally.
mynameismatt2010 5 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 first of all i cant respect the fact that we have laws against immigrants when this country was found on that basis and another thing revert back to my previous comment and read once more. now I've been to many shops up here in ohio and I've never been asked for citizenship. Not even social some states differ but like i said in my previous SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED yet it happens alot especially by people like you PERIOD.
griffinbird123 5 months ago
@griffinbird123 The country was never founded on everyone coming here regardless of where you're from, and there are no laws against immigration, only against illegal immigration. When you were coming over during and after th revolutionary war you were coming through elise isle and you HAD to sign the book, you HAD to pay the $5, and you HAD to be able to do this BEFORE you got on the boat, if you couldn't then you didnt get in. and when it became possible to come on the west coast Angle island.
mynameismatt2010 5 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 oh and obviously you haven't read the constitution close enough either and a cop will still arrest you for carrying a gun anyways nowadays legal or not!
griffinbird123 5 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 so what you're saying is, everyone is equal, but in America, American citizens are more equal than others. Hmmm where had i heard that before? Oh yeah, Animal Farm. See where your logic is heading towards?
chou040195 4 months ago
@chou040195 Actually what i'm saying is that everyone is equal, but America's only responsibility is to make sure that Americans are treated that way, and since America is failing so hard at even doing that, with all of the anti men anti white crap being put in place, do you really think we can effectively do it for everyone else anyway?
mynameismatt2010 4 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 What exactly anti-white anti-male has been done say..in the last 10 years? I'm curious as to what you, as a white male, were able to do before, but not now due to changes in the law?
I'm asking as another white male. Please, humor me.
phuturephunk 4 months ago
@phuturephunk Well, i'm only 19 so i can't tell you what has changed in 10 years out of my own experience, but i know this, white males are something like 3% less likely to get into a university than an equally qualified black woman. Idk if the 3% is up to date, but that's how it was in 2009 when i was appling for college. You are more likely to get a government job if you're a minority than a white man, plus look at alimony law, that's so beyond sexist it's hard to accept that it's real.
mynameismatt2010 4 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 That's fine from a statistic perspective, but none of that is actually codified into law. For the college stat you cited, does this control for all other races? What was the methodology? Fun Fact: In California there's an overwhelming bias towards asians due to their high grades over every other ethic/race group out there, food for thought.
Where are you more likely to get a government job if you're a minority? I've been involved with machine politics for years and can >>
phuturephunk 4 months ago
And I can tell you that there still is a very distinct bias towards white males. This again, depends on the municipality in question...but all this is moot.
I want a concrete example where you, as a white male, were singled out because of your whiteness and treated unfairly due to a law specifically targeting you (as in the wording makes it clear, under no uncertain terms, that your specific race/gender combination are the target).
I'll save you time and say you're not going to find one.
phuturephunk 4 months ago
@phuturephunk You seem to live in a very different world than i do, come to southern california, you'll see just how biased towards white males the justice system is. You want a law specifically designated to favor woman, alimony law. You want a law that specifically favors minorities, welfare and other social programs. Other examples of how government funding is used in a bias against white men, black women are ten times more likely to recieve a pell grant when they apply than a white man is.
mynameismatt2010 4 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 Here's the basic gist behind Pell Grants (I work in education): This grant requires that each applicant is: an undergraduate student who has not yet earned a bachelor’s degree, a United States citizen or an eligible non-citizen, has a high school diploma or a GED or can demonstrate the ability to benefit from the program.
I don't see race mentioned there..
Alimony law has always tended to side with the mother, which should be corrected. This is not hard coded into law >>
phuturephunk 4 months ago
..but rather how JUDGES in family court tend to rule. Again, find me where it is CODIFIED INTO LAW that they have to side with the mother? You're not going to find it..
Welfare and other social programs are completely based on income. Completely.
Again, not to be short with you, but you're displaying an incredible amount of ignorance when it comes to what the law actually says.
This is especially true with that welfare statement. It reaks of you having been sheltered all your life.
phuturephunk 4 months ago
@phuturephunk Actually, i never said any of that was word for word " blacks get more benefits than whites: because they can't do that, but there are tendencies in the law to FAVOR non white non male citizens. And if Welfare is completey based on income why can't my father with no income for 2 years get welfare but a mexican working full rime at minimum wage can? My mom, no income can't get food stamps, my coworker has foodstamps and he gets over minimum wage. Like i said before, just because
mynameismatt2010 4 months ago
@phuturephunk Something is not written clearly in a law that doesn't mean that the law doesn't have the effect of discrimination. As to pell grants, my sister was claimed under my mom who has no income, and was denied twice for a pell grant, yet my mexican girlfriends younger sister who was claimed under her dad while he was making over 100k a year and she got a max grant. Alimony law is actually written to favor women, at least in California.
mynameismatt2010 4 months ago
@phuturephunk Also, here's a true story about my dad, he graduated from the police academy at the top of his class sometime in the mid 80's and applied to the LA police department along with a black girl who barely graduated and the third or fourth ranked guy from his class, neither of the well qualified white guys got the job but the barely qualified black woman did. I could go on with other stories, but it's pointless. The fact is that even though affirmative action is illegal it hasn't ended.
mynameismatt2010 4 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," Source: The 14th Amendment.
justiceforpoets 3 months ago
@justiceforpoets I think that when you read the part, "within its jurisdiction" you were thinking lalalalala to drown out the part of your own source that provides evidence that i'm right.
mynameismatt2010 3 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL. Google the following court cases.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886); Wong Wing v. U.S. (1896);
Plyler v. Doe (1982);
"While illegal aliens do not enjoy all of the rights granted to citizens by the Constitution.. In final analysis, the courts have ruled that, while they are within the borders of the United States, illegal aliens are granted the same fundamental, undeniable constitutional rights granted to all Americans." Refrain from stupidity matt.
justiceforpoets 3 months ago
@justiceforpoets Yes, because a few judges say the Constitution means something that obviously means it's true. You probably think that judicial review is also constitutional. If you don't know how to literally interprete the Constitution then there is no need to reply.
As to the quote, if that were entirely true then we should allow illegal aliens to vote, because that is an unalienable right offered to citizens by the Constitution.
mynameismatt2010 3 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 How can you take a document written 200years ago literally when it was written within the context of the time? That's like saying "i read the bible, and a talking bush SERIOUSLY talked to moses." That's literalism in action. Interpretations change with the times because the context changes. You sir are an idiot, I will no longer be responding to you or your ignorant attacks on the freedoms that anyone deserves regardless of race, creed, or nationality. Fuck off and die.
justiceforpoets 3 months ago
@justiceforpoets There is no reason to assume that what was written 200 years ago doesn't apply now. Literal interpretation or no Constitution, those are the only options. Look at the Bible, since you brought it up, there are hundreds of different interpretations and that leads to vastly different ideals because people think it means anything other than what it said. Unless it is said that something is a parable or a story in the bible, a real believer should assume it happened.
mynameismatt2010 3 months ago
@mynameismatt2010 You have gone full on retarded. You actually believe the bible is word-for-word real? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy shit i cant believe i even tried to convey any kind of logic, good night sir.
justiceforpoets 3 months ago
@justiceforpoets I said people who believe the bible must either believe it means exactly what it says, or accept that they don't really believe the bible. Just because you have contempt for Christianity that doesn't make the Constitution less applicable. It was written with precise wording to be followed precisely, anyone who's taken even a community college history class would know that. You don't even have very good reading skills yet you are trying to talk to me about logic? Just stop.
mynameismatt2010 3 months ago
@justiceforpoets And as to the burning bush that your brought up. Since it also says in the bible that a man can't look at gods face without being changed it stands to reason that the burning bush was a proxy for god so that he could directly communicate with moses, unless you think that is beyond gods power, in which case you have no reason to be bringing the bible up because you are obviously not a Christian and will pull the same move every athiest tries when facing someone smarter than them.
mynameismatt2010 3 months ago
poor Sarah , she is dumb as a rock ...
verbod 6 months ago
What a demmic.
joshlerd 6 months ago
Palin is a retard facking cunt, and every American who doesn't see that, is also a retard.
Koosiey 6 months ago
republicans remind me of nazi's. lol
Nikon05 6 months ago 9
Tragic..
TheChristChris 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Terrorists are not human?
Rockyeeful 6 months ago
Of course God's American, look how God loves to destroy his creation !
LOL just a joke, don't get upset .
fleadle34 6 months ago
Of course God's American, look how God loves to destroy his creation !
fleadle34 6 months ago
The Constitution refers to "the people..." in the Fourth Amendment (and other places) with respect to unreasonable searches and seizures. There are some judges (though nothing binding) who theorize that there's a difference between rights for "the people" and those for any "person" identified in the Constitution. The DOJ believes that the 4th Amendment covers illegal aliens so it's unlikely that any court will draw a distinction. In any event, Palin is ignorant.
BlueSturgeons 6 months ago
Palin = Fucking Stupid.
dave474c 6 months ago 51
Where i come from she is unfitt to have a seat in any tipe of office. We stamp people like her a retard.
TheIcelandicPatriot 6 months ago
it is scary that sarah palin might possibly be the president of the united states. this is the scariest thing ever. imagine this ignorant narrow minded person running the most powerful country in the world?! its a horror movie.
absba9 6 months ago
@absba9 Politician's like her (Bush, etc), are why America will soon no longer be the most powerful country in the world. I don't like the Chinese communist party, but at least their leadership are sane and not bat-shit crazy like the republicans. I'll try to enjoy this last hurrah of sane, competent American leaders (i.e. Obama), before the nut-jobs take back control :( Hopefully, one day, US citizens will realise nut jobs only make things worse. I'll also remain thankful to be Australian :)
XenogeneGray 6 months ago
You're kidding, right? The U.S. constitution was made for Americans... If we should give enemy soldiers our rights, should we tax other countries? Oh wait, no that would be ridicul