but that is true though...Hitler did trust Himmler with both his life and the entire military...Himmler was really Hitler's top ranking General and one of the most trustworthy people Hitler ever met...you know...before he blew his brains out...
wow...Hitler a bigger Douch than i imagined...a almost all of his highest ranking officers betrayed him...even Himmler betrayed him...his highest ranking General...his most trustworthy soldier...one of the very few people he would trust with his life...betrayed him...but this is just a movie cause in real life I'm pretty sure Himmler never betrayed Hitler..no one did...
@GonzoeKb24 How good then nobody has made fun of it. The parodies are made out of love, and the people making and watching them have great respect for the movie and the actors.
@Feanorielle That's not why they make the parodies. An actor doesn't have to be bad to get parodied. They make them because his rage is fitting in so many situations, and for those non-german the videos become funny.
@EzeCoyote Isn't that pretty much what I just said... Nobody thinks the movie is bad. The parodists don't try to mock it, as the original poster claimed.
@milovela1983 Yeah, I think he had the look down about as good as it gets but his voice is terrible. Especially in his high pitched yelling. This overall is the best movie ever surrounding the last days of the 3rd Reich
2 weeks before WW2 hitler deposited all his money in a bank. with the german derpresion he lost all his money. his banker was a jew. coincidence?? maybe, or maybe not. we might never know. hell you migth not even know if what im saying is real
@MrStig691 English is a Germanic Language. That's why a lot people who can speak English fluently can pronounce German words or they can understand a little bit
they had to be exagurating in this movie as funyn as it is because no way if he was that insane around people at the dinner table anyone would ahve followed him
*Hitler sucks* but here is a fact for you guys.before hitler started WWII,he actually gave permission for the jews to leave Germany.But back then countries wouldn't except large amounts of jews back then.I'm not saying were as bad as hitler,in fact we're nowhere close.But just give it a thought and remember that times were different back then.hitler was one of the worst men alive,but he is exaggerated,but he only did what he thought was right.No person wonders what evil they can do tomorrow,none
@awacsokanieba Evean a " Monster " is sometimes hungry , and Evean a " Monster " has Emotions . What did Adolf Hitler do Wat his Counterparts won `t do ? ( Mr. Josef Stalin , Sir Winston Churchill and F.D. Roosevelt )
Kinda interesting to script Hitler into speaking about the affinity of apes and humans, since the record shows that he also questioned it. This isn't unparsimonious though, since he is known to have made dozens of other inconsistent (and yet, insanely proud and confident) statements.
Speaking of which, don't you just love how he speaks about humanity being "nothing but priests' drivel" and yet he's eating veggie food (which many people do for ethical reasons)?
@pinz2022 He wasn't a vegetarian, that was propaganda. Get your facts straight.
Also, your reasoning is flawed. Not all vegetarians are PETA members and being a vegetarian doesn't make you a Nazi. You connect things that have nothing to do with each other like a retard.
Reasoning is a skill you can learn, but you do not posses. If you don't know how to reason, everything you say is irrelevant.
Tut! Tut! I would say he wouldn't qualify as a proper vegetarian in YOUR book. I know he loved butter and that he was a chocoholic. Otherwise, I ain't backing down.
That same strain of self-righteousness and misanthropy that he had in spades characterizes much of you lot as well.
@pinz2022 He ate meat, that's a fact. There's no room for discussion here, that's why it's a fact. It's not self-righteousness when you're plain wrong and stupid.
I have very low tolerance for stupid people, but I would never harm; or even exploit them unlike your masters. But I can't lie to them either. Your life is an illusion.
Also I have no idea what you mean with "in your book". I'm not a vegetarian if that's what you're implying.
@maschinegunfunk85 its funny because TO BE A NAZI just means to be a national socialist XD but because of the course of history it has been turned into black people hating jew killer.... etc.
For you strange people who will take this scene to heart...the theory of evolution is *descriptive*, not *prescriptive*. That means it describes what happens, it doesn't mean that's what SHOULD happen for people to be happy. Likewise, the theory of gravity tells you what will happen if you throw a baby off a balcony, that doesn't mean that doing it is a good thing. Furthermore, cooperation is rewarded by shared knowledge and effort. That's why we feel compassion. Adolf was way wrong.
@EGarrett01 I don't think evolution is true. But what Hitler's saying here is the logical conclusion of the theory. Just saying it's descriptive as opposed to prescriptive, I don't think gets around that.
There is no logical conclusion of the theory. That's exactly what I mean by descriptive and not prescriptive. What is the "logical conclusion" of the theory of gravity? That you should jump out your window?
I find myself reading books about WWII and the Jewish Holocaust (which didn't make sense because Hiler was jewish [ I do my reaserch] by the way), and I find myself screaming when I talk. Am I turning into that man who tried to make the world right in a wrong way?
@phocjame Really? Hitler was a Christian? With him making fun of the cross with the Nazi symbol? And him killing innocent Christians and Jews? NO WAY!!!!!!!!
"the actor can so masterfully portray Hitler like this proves that Hitler was in fact, a human. He is one of us. And any one of us can become him." im 14 and i really want to see the whole movie, but cant due to personal schedule, but every single documentary i seen about ww2, nazi, holocaust, and hitler as a individual, it seems as if he was a organism from another species. he commited unforgivable horrific acts in humanity and we try to not believe he is not human. HaoWenXiang says it all.
@randyHEADLOCKorton When I look at people like Hitler and then look at someone like Ghandi, I often find it hard to believe that the're both part of the same species: humanity
@Necronator1 exactly which is the reason why im excited for see this movie on my free time to see the view of hitler being one of us. it is scary and hard to believe so, but sadly he was a human being
@vaj99 Hitler was a Christian, as was the majority of the Nazi military, he even states outright in Mein Kampf that he thinks he's doing God's work.
He may or may not have been inspired by the concept of Survival of the Fittest, but he interpreted it wrong - eugenics involves artificial selection based on subjective values, whereas survival of the fittest is a natural occurrence in which the organism best suited to its environment survives. Blond hair and blue eyes do not help you survive here.
@phocjame Saying you believe in God doesn't make you a Christian. With that logic, Osama Bin Laden was a Christian. Following the teachings generally accepted by the Christian community makes you a Christian. Hitler despised the central Christian idea of love and compassion for the weak. Nazism was built on the idea of the strong eating the weak, which is the the complete opposite of any Christian ideology.
@Feanorielle 'Saying you believe in God doesn't make you a Christian. With that logic, Osama Bin Laden was a Christian.'
Yes.
'Following the teachings generally accepted by the Christian community makes you a Christian.'
No. The teachings generally accepted by the Christian community not only vary substantially, but are also subject to change and do not necessarily reflect Christianity as described in the Bible.
@Feanorielle Believing in love and compassion for the weak doesn't make you a Christian either - blind faith in the Christian God makes you a true Christian.
You can be the most horrific dictator the world has ever seen, and still be eligible for salvation based on belief and repentance.
Indeed, according to Christian doctrine, the only people who are truly beyond salvation and are damned eternally are those that don't believe and worship God.
@phocjame Eh, you're quit missing the point I made. You claimed Hitler was a Christian based on him claiming there's a god. I pointed out believing in some monotheistic God doesn't automatically make you a Christian. Similarily if someone happens to share the same values Christians have but don't accept the Christian doctorine, they're not Christians. Many atheists have "Christian-like" values too. So only those who accept the Christian doctorines are Christians. Hitler certainly didnt
@phocjame This is really frustrating. You apparently didn't even read my comment before answering. Well, I guess that's what I deserve for bothering to discuss something serious in YouTube. I won't make that mistake again.
@Feanorielle You're arguing that Hitler's simple belief in God does not equate to being him Christian, and that acceptance and adherence to generally accepted Christian doctrine is necessary to be considered a Christian. The flaw in your argument is that generally accepted Christian doctrine is not only subject to difference of opinion, but also consists of various instances of people picking and choosing what they want to believe.
@Feanorielle Hitler did believe in 'Generally accepted Christian doctrine', he just interpreted it to fit in with his own worldview - just as most Christians do. Mein Kampf and his assorted speeches throughout his reign are filled with various references to Christian beliefs.
I do not regard Hitler as a Christian purely because of his monotheistic belief, but because of the numerous direct references to Christian beliefs.
@Feanorielle You've got to understand that even people who don't believe in the concept of hell as described in the Bible due to it conflicting with God's omnibenevolence are still generally accepted to be Christian despite lacking a major element of Christian belief.
Fred Phelps and his congregation are considered Christians - fringe elements, but Christians nonetheless despite preaching a message of hatred to those that do not take the literal biblical interpretation as the gospel truth.
Again, read a science book, because you are VERY wrong. Evolution is a fact. It has been demonstrated time and time again in the lab in real-time. Speciation by natural selection has been observed. DNA evidence, fossil evidence, and homological evidence all corroborate the theory of evolution.
We understand evolution more than we do gravity. Only a fool would say it doesn't exist. Go and educate yourself.
@DR000 Well they cant explain how a single cell which is even more complicated than an intel processor even forms! No scientists has ever managed to create a lifeform from scratch, And even if evolution does occur, it doesnt mean God doesnt exist.
survival of the fittest crap is used by evil people to justify their actions, such as Stalin and hitler, and Thatcher.
The formation of the first cell is beyond the scope of evolution. That question belongs to the theory of abiogeneis, for which we have some evidence. Scientists have, more or less, created a cell from scratch. Google:
Simple Artificial Cell Created From Scratch To Study Cell Complexity
Evolution is in direct conflict with some creation myths. It doesn't disprove God, but it makes YAHWEH or Allah less likely in my opinion.
And so what if people used it for evil? It's true regardless
@DR000 What did they actually accomplish and do their results really raise "profound questions about the essence of life," as one news report stated?1
What Venter's company achieved was a technical feat that does not live up to its headlines. The team of scientists used machines to synthesize DNA from scratch. However, the particular DNA sequence they manufactured was an exact copy of pre-existing DNA from a living strain of bacteria.
Okay. Whatever, that's irrelevant. I said that they more or less created it form scratch, I just wanted to show you the article. It is not contingent on evolution being a fact.
I don't see what Hitler has to do with anything, we're discussing science, not the movie here.
The word 'theory' in science is different from the everyday use of the word. A 'theory' is corroborated by mountains of evidence, and has not been disproved by a counter-example. Evolution is a fact, anyone who denies this fact is denying the evidence. Do you know why we need to update antibiotics?
I don't think you're educated in the theory, or even science. Go learn before you speak
@DR000 I think that's a feeble and buttmad response. It is referred to as a THEORY, which you must just suck. The term Theory is not "Proof", but almost an educated guess from facts, in a sense. The same works for the ANY other Theory, has been challenged. It doesn't matter how real it seems. It hasn't made the news of being officially CONFIRMED 100% everybody-knows yet in the science community, "theory" would be dropped. I know you'll deny that, which is absolutely fanboy.
So what is the alternative then if evolution isn't fact? Is it just some elaborate scheme developed by God to trick us, or a conspiracy by all the scientists to fool us? Which alternative takes more faith?
You theists are ridiculous. The scientific method is the best pathway to truth that we have. NOT FAITH. The evidence, the mountains of evidence, all point towards evolution. It is a FACT.
I don't have enough faith to assume God is a trickster.
@DR000 - "I don't see what Hitler has to do with anything, we're discussing science, not the movie here."
You are no better than those who mention and rant about Christ.
Almost everybody else came here for the Hitler movie. Because you said "I don't see what Hitler has to do with anything" you just admitted none of your comments were relevant to actual content SUPPOSED to be discussed here. Had you watched the clip, you would have known why you were having a petty argument in the first place.
You're a fucking idiot. It's not about the fucking video. Some dipshit made a stupid, uneducated comment about evolution being tied to Hitler, I then strayed the conversation exclusively to evolution because it was the premise of his logic. The conversation is about evolution, not hitler.
Now, are you going to put up an argument against the theory, or are you going to high behind some 'rule' that comments must discuss the video strictly?
@DR000 - Now you are just SAD. I never said anything about believing in whatever.
You just won't stop squirting yourself over what hasn't been fully accepted as a fact. I don't give a shit if it's confirmed tomorrow, right now it's still called a Theory. SUCK IT HARD AND LONG, THAT'S ITS NAME, REAL OR NOT. GO INTO ANY OTHER UNIVERSITY, OR WHEREVER, AND RANTING ABOUT IT BEING A FACT WILL HAVE YOU AND YOU'RE SORRY ASS LAUGHED AT.
Now go take your dick outta the textbooks and live a real life.
"ERSITY, OR WHEREVER, AND RANTING ABOUT IT BEING A FACT WILL HAVE YOU AND YOU'RE SORRY ASS LAUGHED AT."
ahaha, just shut the fuck up. You don't know what you're talking about. Yeah, the biologist researchers at my university whose research depends on evolution being a fact just hope it all works out !
Fucking dipshit, you're arguing semantics now. Thanks for wasting my time you dumb fucker.
@DR000 -"whose research depends on evolution being a fact just hope it all works out !"
There you go. It all depends. It doesn't matter how much research you put into something that makes it true or not. You ain't the part of some national board. You didn't re-name it "the fact." That's why it's called "The Theory of Evolution." Millions of people use it, placeholders in museums use it, and you expect me to believe that they're wrong, just because u mad?
No, we have observed speciation. It is a fact. Just as the Theory of Gravity is a fact. A theory is the highest rank a scientific idea can have - it is basically synonymous with fact. If you're not going to argue the actual theory, I'm bored. Semantic arguments do not interest me.
@DR000 - You enjoy arguing. How pathetic. The Theory of Gravity would apply to the understanding of THE THEORIES OF Gravity. Gravity itself exists, it's no theory. There's a reason why I use Semantics, and it's because you aren't using the term correctly. Evolution's a Theory, like all the others. Arguing that it's a fact is like anything else related to it, is debatable at this point, and technically unproved still holding the name "theory", meaning you're using self-inflated facts.
Then just as Gravity, evolution exists, it happens. The theory aspect of it is understanding how it happens.
This pitiful semantic argument you have created is the only way theists such as yourself can possibly hope to battle your cognitive dissonance with the reality of the world. My god, your stupidity makes my brain numb.
@DR000 - NO. I don't care if it exists or not. The Theory of Gravity refers to the understanding rather than Gravity itself. Evolution on the other hand has not been confirmed in the same way Gravity has, if it DID, the entire science world would shift into a different reaction. In that case, the Theory of Evolution, refers to not only the understanding, but the ENTIRE thing. In the same sense, Gravity has technically not been fully UNDERSTOOD. Now stop whining over how it HAS been confirmed.
We understand evolution far more than we understand gravity. I don't think you've fully comprehended how vast our understanding of evolution is. Bacteria mutate and develop genes to survive against antibiotics, for example. That is, BY DEFINITION, evolution. We have observed it happening countless times. Just as we observe things falling, which implies that gravity exists.
The understanding of why and how it happens is the theory of evolution.
@DR000 - Just because one understands evolution more than gravity doesn't mean it's automatically confirmed to exist. A finer definition of evolution would have to be developed, since I'm sure there's many subtle differences there from actual hardcore evolution, and denying that would be stupid. Until then it's confirmed, there still is question, evolution is still a THEORY. An IDEA, kiddo, a CLOUD, like anything else, which you aren't emotionally strong enough to cram through your thick head.
I compared it to gravity since your last post seemed to imply that our understanding of gravity was greater. "Actual hardcore evolution" is just something you've made up. Evolution, by definition, occurs, and is a fact. We have a tremendous understanding of how organisms evolved, from fossil, DNA, and homological evidence. All of which corroborate each other.
Only a fool would take a large leap of faith, and have the audacity to say the evidence isn't conclusive.
@DR000 - Well, humans aren't like singled celled organisms and would require millions of years to evolve.
So you denied at least that difference, moron. I have Audacity, and millions of other fine people do, too.
If you're passionate about evolution, good, but it ain't ok with you ranting as if it was entirely proven by the science community. It ISN'T. Rarely, (their attitudes in general) do they agree to that level. There are still exploits. Never closing a book isn't as foolish as you think.
I have not denied the difference between multi-celled organisms since i have not mentioned it (strawman, fallacy #1). Both kinds of organisms operate under the same natural selection. Just because a majority of a population have a position, it does not mean the position is correct ( fallacy #2).
By the way, how do you explain the differences between all the organisms on the planet? Why do we need to update antibiotics? Why are homology, DNA, and fossil records corroborative?
@DR000 - I would also like to point out, God help us, (or in the case of not existing, God doesn't care) "the Scientologists were right", we were somehow put on this planet and developed under a close eye, then the question of how exactly, did we evolve since we were under CONTROL, if evolution applies to unnatural cases, and it's existence under technicalities would come into heavy fire and question.
Which is why I was not intimidated by the Cell example. You need an open mind, kiddo.
That paragraph was just a bunch of rubbish. You're trying so hard to salvage your failed position. There is no reason to even consider a scientologist position. There is no evidence to do so. It would just complicate the theory with more things we'd need to prove. Any positive assertion you make about Scientology will be scrutinized by science and your theory will be scrapped.
@DR000 - Well good. I didn't fail at my point. You walked right into it. The fact is, you cannot make the connection that evolution is a theory. No matter how much proof you make, there's a reason why it hasn't been officially confirmed yet, which, you are not capible of admitting. The reason why I bring up the absurd is for the reason you wave off in security: if the absurd does happen, out of a logical system for no reason and random, you will experience an emotional breakdown to all hell.
@DR000 - If you have a need to defend in how the absurd can't happen in a logical world, I'd like to mention the idea of us existing for no reason, created by a random explosion of matter, which did not previously exist before the explosion, matter and all. I would also like mention how quantum mechanics is more-or-less random. You aren't smart or creative enough to have an open mind, and so remain in a controlled mindset. Evolution ISN'T officially confirmed, so you pretend that it HAS been.
We have accurate tools that measured that quantum mechanics is indeed non-deterministic. Thus, it is fact. We have accurate tools that show us that bacterial genomes change over time in response to their environment via natural selection. Thus evolution is fact. You're ignoring the science because it conflicts with your archaic beliefs.
Science does not have an answer to _why_ we exist, but perhaps that's a meaningless question? The best we can do for now is keep researching.
@DR000 - "As, I said, you are clearly buttmad, and inflicting beliefs on me that I don't. Despite the fact you might think you're winning, in my eyes, you're losing. Evolution hasn't been officially confirmed. I don't care how REAL and idea seems to you, you can't argue with the fact that it hasn't been dismissed the "Theory" claim. It isn't "in science", it's your ego. Calling development over time "evolution" is vague. A developed study (evolution or not) is needed. So it's still a theory.
Read the wikipedia article (it is sourced): "Evolution as fact and theory".
I especially want you to comprehend this line:
"Philosophers of science argue that we do not know mind-independent empirical truths with absolute certainty: even direct observations may be "theory laden" and depend on assumptions about our senses and the measuring instruments used. In this sense all facts are provisional.".
If you don't understand that, we are done talking.
@DR000 - I hope you realize that technically, that leaves everything, including everything on your side in uncertain question. Because that was more or less my point by arguing that evolution is still debatable.
You, on the other hand, have more or less done the opposite of that, and will deny any other alternative, and attempt to trample it from what I saw before I left comment, as if it wasn't provisional.
What I heard from the parodies:
FFFUUUUUUUUU!
1:43 I kissed a Saint Bernard!
1:58 Die Die Die Die!
2:11 I've been Fegel-trolled!
2:25 Oh, and whore out Samir Fegelein.
2:35 He went and fucked a priest!
Mortablunt 8 hours ago
I cannot unhear Hitler crapping his pants.
HaI0gen 3 days ago
0:52
ytSouljah 1 week ago
Hmmmm..... Hitler's philosophy in beginning of this video really reminded me of that %$@&# Ayn Rand.
amyx28 1 week ago 2
@amyx28 Reason, freedom and individual rights. Hitler was for all of them. Can tell if troll, or just incredibly stupid.
SpellboundSolution 1 week ago
@amyx28
Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Rand
Mortablunt 8 hours ago
but that is true though...Hitler did trust Himmler with both his life and the entire military...Himmler was really Hitler's top ranking General and one of the most trustworthy people Hitler ever met...you know...before he blew his brains out...
BlackBelt3rdDegree 1 week ago
wow...Hitler a bigger Douch than i imagined...a almost all of his highest ranking officers betrayed him...even Himmler betrayed him...his highest ranking General...his most trustworthy soldier...one of the very few people he would trust with his life...betrayed him...but this is just a movie cause in real life I'm pretty sure Himmler never betrayed Hitler..no one did...
BlackBelt3rdDegree 1 week ago
@BlackBelt3rdDegree I'm pretty sure this movie was based on the true last few days of Hitler's life.
CheesyGranola 1 week ago
Even with the actual subtitles I still can't watch this without imagining farting noises in the background. XD
OldSkoolgamerz 1 week ago
Only ignorant people would make fun of a great movie such as this. Just saying..
GonzoeKb24 2 weeks ago
@GonzoeKb24 How good then nobody has made fun of it. The parodies are made out of love, and the people making and watching them have great respect for the movie and the actors.
Feanorielle 2 weeks ago
@Feanorielle That's not why they make the parodies. An actor doesn't have to be bad to get parodied. They make them because his rage is fitting in so many situations, and for those non-german the videos become funny.
EzeCoyote 1 week ago
@EzeCoyote Isn't that pretty much what I just said... Nobody thinks the movie is bad. The parodists don't try to mock it, as the original poster claimed.
Feanorielle 1 week ago
@Feanorielle You seemed sarcastic.
EzeCoyote 1 week ago
@EzeCoyote Nice. When I try to be sarcastic people don't get it, and when I'm serious people think I'm being sarcastic. Well, now it's sorted out.
Feanorielle 1 week ago
AND HIMLER DIDNT UNCLOGD THE TOILET!
michasx90 2 weeks ago
Fun fact: Hitler was vegetarian. And so am I.
WiiStation360Games 2 weeks ago
I love how everyone got the hell out of there haha
rayshon 2 weeks ago
Wait not f6 i ment 6 ops
Visitourchannel 3 weeks ago
Press F6 repeatedly Hitler becomes a shark
Visitourchannel 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Hyyra 3 weeks ago
i dont get it, what's so funny about fegelein? D:
chiwowalyssa 3 weeks ago
1:50 sounds like
Goring yeah, ever corrupt, imbecile.
Speer, yeah, a big flat bumbling balagunska.
All others ya ya ya ya ya.
ASSHOLELA 3 weeks ago
Thats one hell of of an actor who plays Adolf Hitler....
milovela1983 3 weeks ago 36
@milovela1983 Bruno Ganz ! N1
MISSIRES 2 weeks ago
@milovela1983 Yeah, I think he had the look down about as good as it gets but his voice is terrible. Especially in his high pitched yelling. This overall is the best movie ever surrounding the last days of the 3rd Reich
muriloninja 1 week ago
I'm so glad I saw this movie before all the parodies.
Hessianoct 1 month ago
2 weeks before WW2 hitler deposited all his money in a bank. with the german derpresion he lost all his money. his banker was a jew. coincidence?? maybe, or maybe not. we might never know. hell you migth not even know if what im saying is real
1nfinityAward 1 month ago
what a great leader
GiveMeABloodyUser 1 month ago
the irony in what Hitler said about compassion, is that if a british soldier wouldn't have shown Hitler compassion, Hitler would have died in WW1
darkville 1 month ago
Does he say "the truest of the true" in English, or is it just similar between English and German?
AwesomeHaggis 1 month ago
@AwesomeHaggis It's the similarity. The German phrase was "Der treuest auf der treu" (pronounced as "troy")
westtxtapper 1 month ago
@AwesomeHaggis english roots is German.. no wonder if you find similarities
GiveMeABloodyUser 1 month ago
@GiveMeABloodyUser No.. English doesn't come from German. Both have common origins.
MrStig691 4 weeks ago
@MrStig691 yes it is mister.. read history
GiveMeABloodyUser 4 weeks ago
@MrStig691 English is a Germanic Language. That's why a lot people who can speak English fluently can pronounce German words or they can understand a little bit
MakersMark723 3 weeks ago
@MrStig691 and other then the British, the Germans can pick up English easier compared to say the French, Italians, Russians etc
MakersMark723 3 weeks ago
they had to be exagurating in this movie as funyn as it is because no way if he was that insane around people at the dinner table anyone would ahve followed him
AirmageRS 1 month ago
@AirmageRS
You say that.
Yet....
metaXzero 1 month ago
@AirmageRS
No. He had the public image, his book, and his more private image.
A labyrinth of secrecy and propaganda and fear, I'm still curious to what extent people didn't know about all the executions.
He's just talking about no compassion, no mercy, brutal nature, nothing as crazy as some of his other views.
Usul573 1 month ago
"It's like a rat crawled up my arse and died"
monsterzeroJr 1 month ago
what is the name of this film
23533545 1 month ago
@23533545 The Downfall/Der Untergang.
InazumaElevenDutch 1 month ago
We all know a fegelein....
maccas1329 1 month ago 2
Brilliant scene.
RedneckkRudy 1 month ago
Pretty intresting
davidianlevy 1 month ago
this is the real subtitle
PaulHittenmeyer 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Someone should have him bitching about the menu.
IWannabeJew 2 months ago
I bet that was all a joke planned by Fegelein.
businessballer 2 months ago 12
I'd say 97% of this was absolutely correct!! Good job
christopher122133 2 months ago
the entire time he just has a spaz attack.
TheKonjikiExpress 2 months ago
where can I find this series??
trevorninja100 2 months ago
@trevorninja100 movie is der untergang. If you are talking about the anger series thing then well, its all over the internet as a joke.
beohel 1 month ago
JAJAJAJAJA XD
devetzisGR 2 months ago
if himmler was in control things would have been alot worse.
quarantinepr0duction 2 months ago
*Hitler sucks* but here is a fact for you guys.before hitler started WWII,he actually gave permission for the jews to leave Germany.But back then countries wouldn't except large amounts of jews back then.I'm not saying were as bad as hitler,in fact we're nowhere close.But just give it a thought and remember that times were different back then.hitler was one of the worst men alive,but he is exaggerated,but he only did what he thought was right.No person wonders what evil they can do tomorrow,none
radiationbacon 2 months ago
Crappy, Epic and Awesome
awacsokanieba 2 months ago
@awacsokanieba Evean a " Monster " is sometimes hungry , and Evean a " Monster " has Emotions . What did Adolf Hitler do Wat his Counterparts won `t do ? ( Mr. Josef Stalin , Sir Winston Churchill and F.D. Roosevelt )
daddymhm 2 months ago
@daddymhm sorry my friend, I guess that youve replied to the wrong comment
awacsokanieba 2 months ago
Hitler: BRING FORTH THE PENCIL OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!
ftolmsteen 2 months ago
French toast= death... DAMN YOU FRENCH TOAST!
SonicTheHedgehog1224 2 months ago
I actually didnt laugh once because Bruno Ganz is such a brilliant actor, until he said "Bring me Fegelein!" :D
MarioMetroidFan 2 months ago
ok to sum up what every one is arguing about. Hitler went by darwins ideas of survival of the fittest but belived he was doing things unto God.
nsnake62 2 months ago
Kinda interesting to script Hitler into speaking about the affinity of apes and humans, since the record shows that he also questioned it. This isn't unparsimonious though, since he is known to have made dozens of other inconsistent (and yet, insanely proud and confident) statements.
Speaking of which, don't you just love how he speaks about humanity being "nothing but priests' drivel" and yet he's eating veggie food (which many people do for ethical reasons)?
What an opportunist.
Hirvassalo 2 months ago
@Hirvassalo
Yeah, he was a vegetarian and an animal lover (which does not speak well of the PETA people, what would they do to us if they had power?)
pinz2022 2 months ago
@pinz2022 He wasn't a vegetarian, that was propaganda. Get your facts straight.
Also, your reasoning is flawed. Not all vegetarians are PETA members and being a vegetarian doesn't make you a Nazi. You connect things that have nothing to do with each other like a retard.
Reasoning is a skill you can learn, but you do not posses. If you don't know how to reason, everything you say is irrelevant.
noxure 2 months ago
@noxure
Tut! Tut! I would say he wouldn't qualify as a proper vegetarian in YOUR book. I know he loved butter and that he was a chocoholic. Otherwise, I ain't backing down.
That same strain of self-righteousness and misanthropy that he had in spades characterizes much of you lot as well.
pinz2022 2 months ago
@pinz2022 He ate meat, that's a fact. There's no room for discussion here, that's why it's a fact. It's not self-righteousness when you're plain wrong and stupid.
I have very low tolerance for stupid people, but I would never harm; or even exploit them unlike your masters. But I can't lie to them either. Your life is an illusion.
Also I have no idea what you mean with "in your book". I'm not a vegetarian if that's what you're implying.
noxure 2 months ago
@noxure He had stomach problems. According to this problem he developed a almoast vegetarian diet.
4von4 2 months ago
Why is "Aber Himmler..." translated as "but Himmler, no"?
Aiurin 3 months ago
Fucking microsoft keeps banning his account !
StyrbjornStarke 3 months ago
WHERE IS FEGELEIN!!!
ersintas85 3 months ago 33
fucking in a german brothel.
ASSHOLELA 3 weeks ago
Well i am reading the subtitles and it still seems like a parody=)
ersintas85 3 months ago 58
@ersintas85 because of Fegelein
aquenwisey 2 months ago
@ersintas85 yeah, it's so delusional (especially the part with monkeys) that it seems like a parody.
PiretBCN 1 month ago
JA JA JA JA JA D:
geberejackson38 3 months ago
Don't watch if u don't want the fun from watching funny hitler vids taken from u
lionpulse 3 months ago
Goebells, you mofo! I'm hoping you're being tortured the same way all those Jews were, but magnified a billion times!
FanJamesMarsters 3 months ago
american's love "to be a nazi" what a irony of fate.....fucking yankees
maschinegunfunk85 3 months ago
@maschinegunfunk85 its funny because TO BE A NAZI just means to be a national socialist XD but because of the course of history it has been turned into black people hating jew killer.... etc.
DrOrtmeyer 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The acting really does make you believe that it really is Hitler. Brilliant.
dewiowen1 3 months ago
What an actor!
Carlisle412 3 months ago
It is fegelein's fault
zapper067 3 months ago
der fremdrassigen immer mit brutaler harte eiskalt niederschlagen
und das kann man mit sie machen *faggy hand swing*
himler.. der treuste der treue..
al die anderen JAJAJAJAJAJA :D
oh hitler ur such a comedian
nikolasmaes99 3 months ago
It's ironic, and funny, when Hitler at 2:06 asks about Himler, "Has he gone insane?"
Monkofmagnesia 3 months ago
Hitler fought alien races, that's why he lost the war.
yuirrr 4 months ago
man his acting is off the hook...Ganz deserves the title of the best actors of all time under academy awards or something...Respect!
vpashwin 4 months ago
For you strange people who will take this scene to heart...the theory of evolution is *descriptive*, not *prescriptive*. That means it describes what happens, it doesn't mean that's what SHOULD happen for people to be happy. Likewise, the theory of gravity tells you what will happen if you throw a baby off a balcony, that doesn't mean that doing it is a good thing. Furthermore, cooperation is rewarded by shared knowledge and effort. That's why we feel compassion. Adolf was way wrong.
EGarrett01 4 months ago 17
@EGarrett01 its still only a theory, it is not a proven law... yet
harrywatson13 3 months ago
@EGarrett01 I don't think evolution is true. But what Hitler's saying here is the logical conclusion of the theory. Just saying it's descriptive as opposed to prescriptive, I don't think gets around that.
musoderelict 3 months ago
@musoderelict
There is no logical conclusion of the theory. That's exactly what I mean by descriptive and not prescriptive. What is the "logical conclusion" of the theory of gravity? That you should jump out your window?
EGarrett01 3 months ago
What's the movie exactly?
KeepSkippin 4 months ago
Patriotism = my country is best coz i was born on it.
see the idiot thinking?
Cisser 4 months ago
Press 7 repeatedly
AqwAssasin 4 months ago
thanks to translator...i watched a lot of parody and don't understand what exactly he said....but its all funny....thanks again...
Zalzrul75 4 months ago
I find myself reading books about WWII and the Jewish Holocaust (which didn't make sense because Hiler was jewish [ I do my reaserch] by the way), and I find myself screaming when I talk. Am I turning into that man who tried to make the world right in a wrong way?
TheOlympianstudios 4 months ago
0:49 how a language can be that rude..... :D its even funny to listen :D :D
KarniksCCCP1 4 months ago
What is Hitler eating here? Is that spinach and mashed potatoes?
I always get so hungry when I see it...
TheCaptainmoemoe 4 months ago
@TheCaptainmoemoe
Looks like it, some kind of spinach and potatoes, can't be some pasta can it?
He was pretty strictly vegetarian you know.
Usul573 4 months ago
I bet all the other people at the table were thinking
'Shit, now he's going to start raging again...'
RebornMB 4 months ago
The beginning of the years-long search for Fegelein.
theguycalledchris 4 months ago
0:05 crapping, lol
gmk120 4 months ago
What movie is this from?
mark2talyho 4 months ago
@mark2talyho
Der Untergang.
askjiir 4 months ago
@soviet507 Says the guy with SOVIET in his name
weirdalinstrongbadia 4 months ago
@weirdalinstrongbadia
Yeah well, it's still true smartass.
askjiir 4 months ago
Fegelein is a commie spy looooooool
SuperMrBentley 4 months ago
@phocjame Really? Hitler was a Christian? With him making fun of the cross with the Nazi symbol? And him killing innocent Christians and Jews? NO WAY!!!!!!!!
weirdalinstrongbadia 4 months ago
@weirdalinstrongbadia the swastika was Indian not christian and the pope of that time knew him personally and the pope of now was an Axis soldier
soviet507 4 months ago
lol i love the part: all others: yes yes yes yes yes yes
Overlordcontrol00 4 months ago
I like he says "Himmler" at 1:38
AzSchumy 5 months ago
Best performance form Bruno Ganz
kamurandeliormnli 5 months ago 3
Best performance form Bruno Ganz
kamurandeliormnli 5 months ago
At least Hitler STILL cant find Fegelein.
TheComenterMan 5 months ago 2
This has to be the most depressing dinner ever.
DraconianSilenced 5 months ago
Even here, Fegelein still finds a way of pissing him off.
fartx211 5 months ago 18
"the actor can so masterfully portray Hitler like this proves that Hitler was in fact, a human. He is one of us. And any one of us can become him." im 14 and i really want to see the whole movie, but cant due to personal schedule, but every single documentary i seen about ww2, nazi, holocaust, and hitler as a individual, it seems as if he was a organism from another species. he commited unforgivable horrific acts in humanity and we try to not believe he is not human. HaoWenXiang says it all.
randyHEADLOCKorton 5 months ago
@randyHEADLOCKorton When I look at people like Hitler and then look at someone like Ghandi, I often find it hard to believe that the're both part of the same species: humanity
Necronator1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Necronator1 exactly which is the reason why im excited for see this movie on my free time to see the view of hitler being one of us. it is scary and hard to believe so, but sadly he was a human being
randyHEADLOCKorton 5 months ago
Hitler Stalin and Thatcher were all inspired by Charles Darwins survival of the fitteST crap.
vaj99 5 months ago
@vaj99 Hitler was a Christian, as was the majority of the Nazi military, he even states outright in Mein Kampf that he thinks he's doing God's work.
He may or may not have been inspired by the concept of Survival of the Fittest, but he interpreted it wrong - eugenics involves artificial selection based on subjective values, whereas survival of the fittest is a natural occurrence in which the organism best suited to its environment survives. Blond hair and blue eyes do not help you survive here.
phocjame 5 months ago
@phocjame Saying you believe in God doesn't make you a Christian. With that logic, Osama Bin Laden was a Christian. Following the teachings generally accepted by the Christian community makes you a Christian. Hitler despised the central Christian idea of love and compassion for the weak. Nazism was built on the idea of the strong eating the weak, which is the the complete opposite of any Christian ideology.
Feanorielle 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Feanorielle 'Saying you believe in God doesn't make you a Christian. With that logic, Osama Bin Laden was a Christian.'
Yes.
'Following the teachings generally accepted by the Christian community makes you a Christian.'
No. The teachings generally accepted by the Christian community not only vary substantially, but are also subject to change and do not necessarily reflect Christianity as described in the Bible.
phocjame 2 months ago
@Feanorielle Believing in love and compassion for the weak doesn't make you a Christian either - blind faith in the Christian God makes you a true Christian.
You can be the most horrific dictator the world has ever seen, and still be eligible for salvation based on belief and repentance.
Indeed, according to Christian doctrine, the only people who are truly beyond salvation and are damned eternally are those that don't believe and worship God.
tl;dr Hitler can go to heaven, I can't.
phocjame 2 months ago
@phocjame Eh, you're quit missing the point I made. You claimed Hitler was a Christian based on him claiming there's a god. I pointed out believing in some monotheistic God doesn't automatically make you a Christian. Similarily if someone happens to share the same values Christians have but don't accept the Christian doctorine, they're not Christians. Many atheists have "Christian-like" values too. So only those who accept the Christian doctorines are Christians. Hitler certainly didnt
Feanorielle 2 months ago
@Feanorielle Read Mein Kampf. It's quite enlightening on this point.
phocjame 2 months ago
@Feanorielle Anyway, I'm not missing the point you made - you think that believing in love and compassion for the weak makes you a Christian? Nope.
What you need to be a true Christian, as ordained by the Bible, is blind and unswerving belief in and allegiance to God.
Besides, Mein Kampf and Hitler's various speeches are full of references to God, love, compassion, and various supposedly 'Christian' qualities.
phocjame 2 months ago
@phocjame This is really frustrating. You apparently didn't even read my comment before answering. Well, I guess that's what I deserve for bothering to discuss something serious in YouTube. I won't make that mistake again.
Feanorielle 2 months ago
@Feanorielle You're arguing that Hitler's simple belief in God does not equate to being him Christian, and that acceptance and adherence to generally accepted Christian doctrine is necessary to be considered a Christian. The flaw in your argument is that generally accepted Christian doctrine is not only subject to difference of opinion, but also consists of various instances of people picking and choosing what they want to believe.
phocjame 2 months ago
@Feanorielle Hitler did believe in 'Generally accepted Christian doctrine', he just interpreted it to fit in with his own worldview - just as most Christians do. Mein Kampf and his assorted speeches throughout his reign are filled with various references to Christian beliefs.
I do not regard Hitler as a Christian purely because of his monotheistic belief, but because of the numerous direct references to Christian beliefs.
phocjame 2 months ago
@Feanorielle You've got to understand that even people who don't believe in the concept of hell as described in the Bible due to it conflicting with God's omnibenevolence are still generally accepted to be Christian despite lacking a major element of Christian belief.
Fred Phelps and his congregation are considered Christians - fringe elements, but Christians nonetheless despite preaching a message of hatred to those that do not take the literal biblical interpretation as the gospel truth.
phocjame 2 months ago
@vaj99
Evolution is a fact you uneducated moron. Read a fucking book.
DR000 4 months ago
@DR000 No evidence to suggest evolution exists, it was just an ideology invented by some whiteman.
vaj99 4 months ago
@vaj99
Again, read a science book, because you are VERY wrong. Evolution is a fact. It has been demonstrated time and time again in the lab in real-time. Speciation by natural selection has been observed. DNA evidence, fossil evidence, and homological evidence all corroborate the theory of evolution.
We understand evolution more than we do gravity. Only a fool would say it doesn't exist. Go and educate yourself.
DR000 4 months ago
@DR000 Well they cant explain how a single cell which is even more complicated than an intel processor even forms! No scientists has ever managed to create a lifeform from scratch, And even if evolution does occur, it doesnt mean God doesnt exist.
survival of the fittest crap is used by evil people to justify their actions, such as Stalin and hitler, and Thatcher.
vaj99 4 months ago
@vaj99
The formation of the first cell is beyond the scope of evolution. That question belongs to the theory of abiogeneis, for which we have some evidence. Scientists have, more or less, created a cell from scratch. Google:
Simple Artificial Cell Created From Scratch To Study Cell Complexity
Evolution is in direct conflict with some creation myths. It doesn't disprove God, but it makes YAHWEH or Allah less likely in my opinion.
And so what if people used it for evil? It's true regardless
DR000 4 months ago
@DR000 What did they actually accomplish and do their results really raise "profound questions about the essence of life," as one news report stated?1
What Venter's company achieved was a technical feat that does not live up to its headlines. The team of scientists used machines to synthesize DNA from scratch. However, the particular DNA sequence they manufactured was an exact copy of pre-existing DNA from a living strain of bacteria.
vaj99 4 months ago
@vaj99
Okay. Whatever, that's irrelevant. I said that they more or less created it form scratch, I just wanted to show you the article. It is not contingent on evolution being a fact.
DR000 4 months ago
@DR000 - If you choose to believe that evolution is a fact, than good for you.
However, like anything else, it's still known as the THEORY of evolution. That's just what it is.
It's more-or-less official title. Like the Theory of the Big Bang. Deal with it.
Also, I find it quite irrelevant that you are arguing because a pissed Hitler mentioned imitating Donkey Kongs. Hitler is pissed. Now shut up.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
I don't see what Hitler has to do with anything, we're discussing science, not the movie here.
The word 'theory' in science is different from the everyday use of the word. A 'theory' is corroborated by mountains of evidence, and has not been disproved by a counter-example. Evolution is a fact, anyone who denies this fact is denying the evidence. Do you know why we need to update antibiotics?
I don't think you're educated in the theory, or even science. Go learn before you speak
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 I think that's a feeble and buttmad response. It is referred to as a THEORY, which you must just suck. The term Theory is not "Proof", but almost an educated guess from facts, in a sense. The same works for the ANY other Theory, has been challenged. It doesn't matter how real it seems. It hasn't made the news of being officially CONFIRMED 100% everybody-knows yet in the science community, "theory" would be dropped. I know you'll deny that, which is absolutely fanboy.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
So what is the alternative then if evolution isn't fact? Is it just some elaborate scheme developed by God to trick us, or a conspiracy by all the scientists to fool us? Which alternative takes more faith?
You theists are ridiculous. The scientific method is the best pathway to truth that we have. NOT FAITH. The evidence, the mountains of evidence, all point towards evolution. It is a FACT.
I don't have enough faith to assume God is a trickster.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - "I don't see what Hitler has to do with anything, we're discussing science, not the movie here."
You are no better than those who mention and rant about Christ.
Almost everybody else came here for the Hitler movie. Because you said "I don't see what Hitler has to do with anything" you just admitted none of your comments were relevant to actual content SUPPOSED to be discussed here. Had you watched the clip, you would have known why you were having a petty argument in the first place.
super58173 3 months ago 6
@super58173
You're a fucking idiot. It's not about the fucking video. Some dipshit made a stupid, uneducated comment about evolution being tied to Hitler, I then strayed the conversation exclusively to evolution because it was the premise of his logic. The conversation is about evolution, not hitler.
Now, are you going to put up an argument against the theory, or are you going to high behind some 'rule' that comments must discuss the video strictly?
Come at me bro.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - Now you are just SAD. I never said anything about believing in whatever.
You just won't stop squirting yourself over what hasn't been fully accepted as a fact. I don't give a shit if it's confirmed tomorrow, right now it's still called a Theory. SUCK IT HARD AND LONG, THAT'S ITS NAME, REAL OR NOT. GO INTO ANY OTHER UNIVERSITY, OR WHEREVER, AND RANTING ABOUT IT BEING A FACT WILL HAVE YOU AND YOU'RE SORRY ASS LAUGHED AT.
Now go take your dick outta the textbooks and live a real life.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
"ERSITY, OR WHEREVER, AND RANTING ABOUT IT BEING A FACT WILL HAVE YOU AND YOU'RE SORRY ASS LAUGHED AT."
ahaha, just shut the fuck up. You don't know what you're talking about. Yeah, the biologist researchers at my university whose research depends on evolution being a fact just hope it all works out !
Fucking dipshit, you're arguing semantics now. Thanks for wasting my time you dumb fucker.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 -"whose research depends on evolution being a fact just hope it all works out !"
There you go. It all depends. It doesn't matter how much research you put into something that makes it true or not. You ain't the part of some national board. You didn't re-name it "the fact." That's why it's called "The Theory of Evolution." Millions of people use it, placeholders in museums use it, and you expect me to believe that they're wrong, just because u mad?
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
No, we have observed speciation. It is a fact. Just as the Theory of Gravity is a fact. A theory is the highest rank a scientific idea can have - it is basically synonymous with fact. If you're not going to argue the actual theory, I'm bored. Semantic arguments do not interest me.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - You enjoy arguing. How pathetic. The Theory of Gravity would apply to the understanding of THE THEORIES OF Gravity. Gravity itself exists, it's no theory. There's a reason why I use Semantics, and it's because you aren't using the term correctly. Evolution's a Theory, like all the others. Arguing that it's a fact is like anything else related to it, is debatable at this point, and technically unproved still holding the name "theory", meaning you're using self-inflated facts.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
Then just as Gravity, evolution exists, it happens. The theory aspect of it is understanding how it happens.
This pitiful semantic argument you have created is the only way theists such as yourself can possibly hope to battle your cognitive dissonance with the reality of the world. My god, your stupidity makes my brain numb.
Are we going to argue the theory now?
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - NO. I don't care if it exists or not. The Theory of Gravity refers to the understanding rather than Gravity itself. Evolution on the other hand has not been confirmed in the same way Gravity has, if it DID, the entire science world would shift into a different reaction. In that case, the Theory of Evolution, refers to not only the understanding, but the ENTIRE thing. In the same sense, Gravity has technically not been fully UNDERSTOOD. Now stop whining over how it HAS been confirmed.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
We understand evolution far more than we understand gravity. I don't think you've fully comprehended how vast our understanding of evolution is. Bacteria mutate and develop genes to survive against antibiotics, for example. That is, BY DEFINITION, evolution. We have observed it happening countless times. Just as we observe things falling, which implies that gravity exists.
The understanding of why and how it happens is the theory of evolution.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - Just because one understands evolution more than gravity doesn't mean it's automatically confirmed to exist. A finer definition of evolution would have to be developed, since I'm sure there's many subtle differences there from actual hardcore evolution, and denying that would be stupid. Until then it's confirmed, there still is question, evolution is still a THEORY. An IDEA, kiddo, a CLOUD, like anything else, which you aren't emotionally strong enough to cram through your thick head.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
I compared it to gravity since your last post seemed to imply that our understanding of gravity was greater. "Actual hardcore evolution" is just something you've made up. Evolution, by definition, occurs, and is a fact. We have a tremendous understanding of how organisms evolved, from fossil, DNA, and homological evidence. All of which corroborate each other.
Only a fool would take a large leap of faith, and have the audacity to say the evidence isn't conclusive.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - Well, humans aren't like singled celled organisms and would require millions of years to evolve.
So you denied at least that difference, moron. I have Audacity, and millions of other fine people do, too.
If you're passionate about evolution, good, but it ain't ok with you ranting as if it was entirely proven by the science community. It ISN'T. Rarely, (their attitudes in general) do they agree to that level. There are still exploits. Never closing a book isn't as foolish as you think.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
I have not denied the difference between multi-celled organisms since i have not mentioned it (strawman, fallacy #1). Both kinds of organisms operate under the same natural selection. Just because a majority of a population have a position, it does not mean the position is correct ( fallacy #2).
By the way, how do you explain the differences between all the organisms on the planet? Why do we need to update antibiotics? Why are homology, DNA, and fossil records corroborative?
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - I would also like to point out, God help us, (or in the case of not existing, God doesn't care) "the Scientologists were right", we were somehow put on this planet and developed under a close eye, then the question of how exactly, did we evolve since we were under CONTROL, if evolution applies to unnatural cases, and it's existence under technicalities would come into heavy fire and question.
Which is why I was not intimidated by the Cell example. You need an open mind, kiddo.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
That paragraph was just a bunch of rubbish. You're trying so hard to salvage your failed position. There is no reason to even consider a scientologist position. There is no evidence to do so. It would just complicate the theory with more things we'd need to prove. Any positive assertion you make about Scientology will be scrutinized by science and your theory will be scrapped.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - Well good. I didn't fail at my point. You walked right into it. The fact is, you cannot make the connection that evolution is a theory. No matter how much proof you make, there's a reason why it hasn't been officially confirmed yet, which, you are not capible of admitting. The reason why I bring up the absurd is for the reason you wave off in security: if the absurd does happen, out of a logical system for no reason and random, you will experience an emotional breakdown to all hell.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
Again, you fail to understand what a theory means in science. The last bit of your paragraph was pure nonsense, by the way.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - If you have a need to defend in how the absurd can't happen in a logical world, I'd like to mention the idea of us existing for no reason, created by a random explosion of matter, which did not previously exist before the explosion, matter and all. I would also like mention how quantum mechanics is more-or-less random. You aren't smart or creative enough to have an open mind, and so remain in a controlled mindset. Evolution ISN'T officially confirmed, so you pretend that it HAS been.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
We have accurate tools that measured that quantum mechanics is indeed non-deterministic. Thus, it is fact. We have accurate tools that show us that bacterial genomes change over time in response to their environment via natural selection. Thus evolution is fact. You're ignoring the science because it conflicts with your archaic beliefs.
Science does not have an answer to _why_ we exist, but perhaps that's a meaningless question? The best we can do for now is keep researching.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - "As, I said, you are clearly buttmad, and inflicting beliefs on me that I don't. Despite the fact you might think you're winning, in my eyes, you're losing. Evolution hasn't been officially confirmed. I don't care how REAL and idea seems to you, you can't argue with the fact that it hasn't been dismissed the "Theory" claim. It isn't "in science", it's your ego. Calling development over time "evolution" is vague. A developed study (evolution or not) is needed. So it's still a theory.
super58173 3 months ago
@super58173
Read the wikipedia article (it is sourced): "Evolution as fact and theory".
I especially want you to comprehend this line:
"Philosophers of science argue that we do not know mind-independent empirical truths with absolute certainty: even direct observations may be "theory laden" and depend on assumptions about our senses and the measuring instruments used. In this sense all facts are provisional.".
If you don't understand that, we are done talking.
DR000 3 months ago
@DR000 - I hope you realize that technically, that leaves everything, including everything on your side in uncertain question. Because that was more or less my point by arguing that evolution is still debatable.
You, on the other hand, have more or less done the opposite of that, and will deny any other alternative, and attempt to trample it from what I saw before I left comment, as if it wasn't provisional.
super58173 3 months ago