Added: 5 years ago
From: Fletch061078
Views: 8,796
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Who the fuck flagged this?

  • you people are assholes. from a professional film prospective, this is a great piece of work, done to show off editing skills. I think it's fabulous, and was pulled off great. Good work!

  • Good effect.

  • you're both idiots

  • Who do you mean by 'both'?

  • HOW THE HELL COULD SOMEONE FLAG THIS

  • Because no one should deny pain and say its good

  • What pain? The title clearly says it's fake. The gentleman, actually the dad of a good friend of mine, is well and suffered no pain whatsoever. It's an effect shot for a movie. I seriously doubt anyone could misunderstand and think it's real.

  • No no, you're just trying to sweet-play a violence fantasy. It doesn't matter if its a film trick. What matters is what happens in the trick.

  • Are you saying I have a violence fantasy? It's not right to judge people you don't even know. And I disagree: it DOES matter that it's fake. I hate real life violence and pain. The clip doesn't even show any pain or suffering. And finally, when, as a filmmaker, I need to tell the story of a criminal organization who kills anyone in their way, I can't demonstrate it by having them just slap somebody in the face. Those people ARE violent, it's shocking, yes, but in real life, those things happen.

  • Yet you make a violent trick on the Youtube to get attention. You want to show your skill but also your grasp on being violent. That's why you didn't critizise your violence beforehand but only as an excuse when I refuse to accept your little demonstration of power. I do know this about any one who makes violent videos.

  • I didn't make the clip for YouTube, like I already said. Get attention? I can't deny that, but not for the violence itself, just for my effect skills. The point is that you obviously don't understand the HUGE difference between mild screen and reallife violence. You seem to put me in the same category as those people posting real accident videos. The reason I didn't 'critizise' the very mild violence is that I didn't see a reason for it. It's just an effect - nothing more.

  • For you its just an effect For me and the flagger it is shocking Graphic violence is graphic regardless of where it appears And this is not about you being somehow grazy its just the thing which happens in the video which is bad And all violence is unhealthy and bad entertainment Turn the camera and let the car crash into a character out of the picture Thats quite enough of storytelling about pedestrian accidents We know what happens, we don't need to see details. We close our eyes in real life.

  • I agree with some of your points. But IMHO there are different kinds of screen violence. Too graphic screen violence, even if I know it's fake, makes me sick, too. Dismembering, lots of blood etc. is highly questionable and unnecessary in most cases. But sometimes storytelling requires some explicit violence to achieve a shocking effect and to depict real life - and some people (not kiddies who 'like' violence) want to see it. But it's your right to find it graphic. I respect your opinion.

  • ViolenceIsUnnecessaryItIsLikeF­ashionItTries ToBeSoldOnTheMarketByMovingAro­undThe BoundariesOfGoodTasteYouMakeVi­olenceBecauseYou ThinkLikeFashionThisIsRational­WhenTryingTo MakeAGoodProductOnTheMarketBut­WhenConsidered FromThePeoplesPOVItsJust a question of liking Subjective preference That we can and should dismiss and always replace with conscience of what is good This critisism is meant to end fashion spurred violence and to make the culture think like individuals As such we do not like violence

  • hey good work, i have a question, i heard colleges dig stuff up on the internet about people that might go to their colleges, if so, would this be bad? jw cuz i was thinkin of maybe doing a vid like this

  • Really? First time I'm hearing this. And if so: if you don't show really cruel and gory stuff like dismemberment, I couldn't think for a reason why it should be negative. It's creative stuff, even the guys in Hollywood do it (Meet Joe Black, Snatch). It's not about being a 'fan' of cruelty and they should understand.

  • u have a point, i guess we can get away with it since we're "kids" lol or at least i am

  • Hehe, ... Eifach Genial gmacht, Enea!!! :-)

  • Really Well done...I would have paid GOOD money for your clip

  • Oops indeed i didn't read sorry ^^

  • Hey nice ! Which software do you use?

  • Erm...the answer is 2 posts below: this version with Photoshop and Premiere 6.5. A new version (not posted here) with After FX. After FX is the best way to go.

  • r u kidding! that looks way beter than any dummy would!

  • That was nice done! I've also made som fake accident stuff, watch them! By the way, what program did you use?

  • I did this early version with Photoshop and Premiere 6.5. I did a new improved version with After FX, though, with better motion blur and added shadow of the actor on the car.

  • Erm, got a question.

    Is there a wazy you can do that, but with two videos?

    The pedestrian video and the carf video?

    Coz, i dunno if you haven't noticed, but the car wheels wont't move at all O.o

    It looks like pic of a car just being moved through the screen instead of a real car driving :o

  • I used a high speed shutter on the camera to make fx editing easier (shouldn't have done that, wasn't really necessary). That's why the wheels may appear as if they didn't move. They did, though, and if you look closely, you can also see how the car changes perspective. I took the car footage just a few seconds after the actor crossed the street, on exactly the same spot. No image, real video here.

  • VERY FUNNY!!!!!!!!!

  • Is funny!

  • Erm... ow?

  • i hope that was fake...

  • Don't worry, he's well and alive! I just needed him to bend over, the rest was digital compositing. The man is my friend's dad, by the way...being run over by his own son! ;)

  • cool

  • Part 2:

    In your compositing software clean the background (blue) in the actor's take as soon as the car is supposed to hit. You can also work with masking. You get a layer with the actor and no background. Mix the unedited actor's take and the car take together (masking works best). When the car reaches the actor, replace the actor's layer with the one with the clean background. Add motion to the layer, trying to simulate a real impact. Finally add some motion blur - and you're done! ;)

  • when you film yourself you have to act like your being hit correct?

  • Exactly! The final result looks more realistic, if you already got some physical motion of the actor before adding the digital motion. Any motion helps. In my clip I couldn't expect my actor to make huge jumps, but he bent over and pulled up a leg, which was already very helpful.

  • Part 1:

    Shoot the footage of a person crossing the street. Use a tripod. DON'T MOVE THE CAMERA and shoot the car driving by. Try shooting the takes as quickly as possible; shadows and light should change as little as possible between takes.

  • Nice, I like it. :)

  • I've always wondered; how do you do that kind of thing?

  • WTF?

  • Would you like to tell me something specific by that?

  • hey how do you do them? do you have to be clever cause im not good at that?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more