The audio has been corrupted for over a year now and Paladonia no longer seems to be maintaining his or her video uploads . . . because I love this video so much, I downloaded and re-uploaded it so it works now. If Paladonia would like me to take the video down, I'll do so immediately. Meanwhile, you can still enjoy it by searching for "The Book of Love - YouTube video by "Paladonia""
How can you say there is humour in this? its a love song. Peter Gabriel just improves it with a more modern approach , and love it or hate it, its a generally better made track than this
i can see where some people would find humor in it. The lines like the book of love is long and boring or talking about the music being really dumb. I dunno I guess its just the turn around the singer has from the verse to the chorus. But I wouldn't say it's necessarily humorous but I can see where whoever said that is coming from.
covering this is like covering "Love will tear us apart" by Joy Division. you sacrifice part of its essence when making a cover... unless you turn it into something else.
I heard the "natalydawn" cover here on youtube and it's pretty much the only cover of this song that I like.
Gabriel's version takes away from the humor that is so quintessential of Merrit's lyrics.
Every track off of 69 love songs is, obviously, a love song. But Gabriel turns it into this epic ballad - not a bad thing, but I prefer the quaint simplicity of the original.
@mep338 Wrong. This song is by The Magnetic Fields. Paul Gabriel did a cover, that just happened to become more well known than the original. Do your research before jumping to conclusions. ;)
I first heard peter gabriels version, I'm only 19 so I had not heard much of him at all, Just heard this song in some movie, But then I found this version and it really speaks to me, I'm dark and twisty and half crazy so this really is like how I would make a song if I could write, not that I can.... god maybe I should just shut up now... hahaha anyways I love this version
these sure are hateful comments considering that this is a song about love and that everyone here has admitted that they enjoy the song in some capacity.
I think the writer of the song can do a worse version than a copy, But this song is beautiful and MUCH better than the Gabriel version. Merchant is amazing.
the people who prefer this version to peter gabriel's version are probably the same people who think nine inch nails do a better version of hurt than johnny cash!! clean your ears!!
Lol iamlionproductions Nine Inch Nails' version of Hurt IS better than Johnny Cash's... it's the original! All of the pain and anger and loss and sadness in the song came from Nine Inch Nails. *rolls eyes*
just cause its the original doesnt make it better!! the NIN version just doest give me the shivers down my spine like the cash version does. and cash is a better singer than trent. but thats just my opinion!!
I just found this version after bantering with another poster over whether Peter Gabriel did the song justice. I find no difference accept that PG is moe famous. But BOTH renditions are good.
The audio has been corrupted for over a year now and Paladonia no longer seems to be maintaining his or her video uploads . . . because I love this video so much, I downloaded and re-uploaded it so it works now. If Paladonia would like me to take the video down, I'll do so immediately. Meanwhile, you can still enjoy it by searching for "The Book of Love - YouTube video by "Paladonia""
malduf 3 months ago
A shame the hammer came down, this was a work of art in its own right.
90210411 1 year ago
please repost this with fixed audio, it's such a good video.
hashiepashi 1 year ago
Aw, nerfed!
90210411 1 year ago
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE AUDIO?!
hashiepashi 1 year ago 4
we're all to young...
aslakemil 1 year ago
this is good but i like gabriel's version a lot better
jannellybear 1 year ago
I think that the ending with the fireworks, and the audio after that is a beautiful visual.
Just saying.
hashiepashi 2 years ago
How did such a rinky dink musician with such a goofy baritone voice write such a beautiful piece of music?
robdorg 2 years ago
neither of those 'qualifications' should effect his songwriting. they didn't hurt cash, either.
IanGS91 2 years ago 2
curious, ever listened to Bob Dyan or Willie Nelson?
enjoyingmylife 2 years ago
He put work into finding out how best to express what he was feeling.
Zekkron 1 year ago
nice song..
freakofmusique 2 years ago
How can you say there is humour in this? its a love song. Peter Gabriel just improves it with a more modern approach , and love it or hate it, its a generally better made track than this
shortbread101 2 years ago
Just listen to the depth of the voices...Modern does not always mean improved
h0h1h2h3h4 2 years ago
i can see where some people would find humor in it. The lines like the book of love is long and boring or talking about the music being really dumb. I dunno I guess its just the turn around the singer has from the verse to the chorus. But I wouldn't say it's necessarily humorous but I can see where whoever said that is coming from.
delbert0504 2 years ago
I don't know if it's really humor, or simply the realization of some of life and love's absurdities, but one of those things is present.
Zekkron 1 year ago
because their can't be humour in love?
flowolf42 2 years ago
fokus på possitivitet
peppeluppen 2 years ago
this video, imo, is somehow perfect, even with the audio form teh vids at times. Odd, but perfect. Thanks for making it and posting it.
brucefetter 2 years ago 5
covering this is like covering "Love will tear us apart" by Joy Division. you sacrifice part of its essence when making a cover... unless you turn it into something else.
I heard the "natalydawn" cover here on youtube and it's pretty much the only cover of this song that I like.
ProfetaParanoia 2 years ago 3
peter gabriel
tcg647 2 years ago
oh, I really *don't* like the Peter Gabriel version.
but that's just personal.
ProfetaParanoia 2 years ago
Gabriel's version takes away from the humor that is so quintessential of Merrit's lyrics.
Every track off of 69 love songs is, obviously, a love song. But Gabriel turns it into this epic ballad - not a bad thing, but I prefer the quaint simplicity of the original.
shebampow 2 years ago 17
Comment removed
mep338 4 months ago
@mep338 Wrong. This song is by The Magnetic Fields. Paul Gabriel did a cover, that just happened to become more well known than the original. Do your research before jumping to conclusions. ;)
snyckerss 4 months ago
well done^^
Fintenliebhaber 2 years ago
Love it. Great in original... .
leosky2 2 years ago
Cool accompanying video.
The Gabriel version sounds like its from a disney film!
One for the James Blunt fans perhaps?
iamsniffer 2 years ago
Peter Gabriel's version's more beautiful
IceShapedGod 2 years ago
It escapes me, how you could possibly say that.
kidblink182 2 years ago 4
I can't believe people prefer the Gabriel cover... Horses for courses I suppose!
ShirazSupper 2 years ago 3
the best version of this song I have ever heard is sung bu REBECCA HARKIN. check out her myspace! she's amazing!
hdg18belle 2 years ago
haunting...mmmm. ^-^
twiliteXskylite 2 years ago
Peter Gabriels version is SO much better. This is still good though.
YouGotTeaBagged 2 years ago
oh and I really love peter gabriels version,
LeavingToChange 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
faggot ^^^^^^^^^
Alex1994R 2 years ago
HAHAHAHA wow we have a 12 year old in the room
LeavingToChange 2 years ago 2
grow up son
rgiardina 2 years ago
I first heard peter gabriels version, I'm only 19 so I had not heard much of him at all, Just heard this song in some movie, But then I found this version and it really speaks to me, I'm dark and twisty and half crazy so this really is like how I would make a song if I could write, not that I can.... god maybe I should just shut up now... hahaha anyways I love this version
LeavingToChange 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ur still a faggot ^^^^
Alex1994R 2 years ago
great post. i think you should try to write your own stuff, might be good for you and you might like it
enjoyingmylife 2 years ago
magnetic fields may have wrote it, but Gabriel makes this song imo
alpierce123 2 years ago
there's a difference in the deliveries. this version's more frustrated and ironical, and Gabriel's version plays it as a straight love song.
peteykent 2 years ago
these sure are hateful comments considering that this is a song about love and that everyone here has admitted that they enjoy the song in some capacity.
happycone26 2 years ago
Magnetic Fields made this song so the people who like Peter Gabriel can fuck off!!
Alex1994R 2 years ago
I think the writer of the song can do a worse version than a copy, But this song is beautiful and MUCH better than the Gabriel version. Merchant is amazing.
ratchen 2 years ago
no offense but this is terrible. so monotoneic
slash15axl 2 years ago
I like Peter Gabriel's version better. More emotion in the singing and music.
InvaderPet 2 years ago 3
iamlionproductions...
how can you say that a writer can't sing there own song well enough?
trent reznor sings his own song just fine and cash does a great job covering it.
this song is a great song, both versions are good to listen to.
you shouldn't be aloud to listen to music.
ivegotdots 2 years ago 2
the people who prefer this version to peter gabriel's version are probably the same people who think nine inch nails do a better version of hurt than johnny cash!! clean your ears!!
iamlionproductions 2 years ago
Right on!
Occasionally cover versions are better than the original.
RevTekkX 2 years ago
I totally Agree with you.
Sarkarin 2 years ago
Lol iamlionproductions Nine Inch Nails' version of Hurt IS better than Johnny Cash's... it's the original! All of the pain and anger and loss and sadness in the song came from Nine Inch Nails. *rolls eyes*
theastarkid 2 years ago
just cause its the original doesnt make it better!! the NIN version just doest give me the shivers down my spine like the cash version does. and cash is a better singer than trent. but thats just my opinion!!
iamlionproductions 2 years ago
Okay. No hard feelings? :)
My opinion is the opposite... I want to cry whenever I hear Reznor's version, and the Cash version does nothing for me.
But anyway, this comment is nothing about The Book of Love so I'd better stop talking now. o_0
theastarkid 2 years ago
Fantastic. Magnetic Fields blow the socks off Gabriel's version.
Mamtor13 2 years ago
I prefer peter gabriel
GothicHorror10 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
can't tell how grateful i am that you put this up..i am so damn sick of peter fucking gabriel on youtube
heartagramkisses666 2 years ago
funny how gabriel owned this song this guy sounds like a dying sheep in the throes of foot and mouth disease..
sketchyfolk 2 years ago
hahahahaaaha, funny
rubencelebes 2 years ago
oh god after hearing Peter's this just sounds crap and like a frunk man singing! =/
tomdc7 2 years ago
anyone know where i can download peter gabriels version?
caspe34monty 2 years ago
Limewire?
KorinBeck 2 years ago
well. itunes. or of off google. if you know how to do that. message me if you need directions.
Nandrew22 2 years ago
this is really sweet.
gorramdoll 2 years ago
this isnt bad, but gabriel's cover was a million times better
lynottlives 2 years ago
wow, I hugely disagree. Stephin Merritt's voice is a little weird when you first hear it, but really I find it very beautiful and tender.
gorramdoll 2 years ago 3
I prefer this version to peter gabriel's. the voice fits better.
derdriui 2 years ago 2
I don't know about.
brightlights456X 2 years ago
what a shit! T_T
Peter Gabriel's version is a lot better...
Mikey234432 2 years ago 2
agreed
NARUTOOOO123123123 2 years ago 2
You got that right. I thought this version would blow me away.
brightlights456X 2 years ago
As did I, its decent like, but Gabriel's version is awesome
No Bo Burnham
boburnhamsucks123 2 years ago 2
lol
xxxxFootballxxxx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is a shit song
americanpiebookoflov 2 years ago
lol
werabunny 2 years ago
heh. your name belies your comment.
derdriui 2 years ago
Pwnd.
No Bo
boburnhamsucks123 2 years ago
Love this. Nice Job.
CourageRenewal 3 years ago 3
this song makes me sad
i feel like crying sometimes when i hear it
JeffersonRabbit 3 years ago 4
me too
mkrosova 2 years ago 2
Lovely song, lovely movie.
TheDaddyCokes 3 years ago
is this the originsl singer? cuz this definley isnt Perter Gabriel. still great job! 5 starz! :)
gtwins1103 3 years ago
The original is by the Magnetic Fields, written and sung by their leader Stephin Merritt, as the film alludes to at the end.
TheDaddyCokes 3 years ago
T_T the song... T_T T_T T_T
redmoonx 3 years ago
this video is great, well done.
jobe129 3 years ago
I miss this stinking band so bad!!!
Soggycorndogs 3 years ago 2
nice movie
StephinMerritt 3 years ago
Thank You
PALADONIA 3 years ago
I just found this version after bantering with another poster over whether Peter Gabriel did the song justice. I find no difference accept that PG is moe famous. But BOTH renditions are good.
wnt0 3 years ago
Surreal voice.
amitabdeb 3 years ago 2
Beautiful ....
Book of love by Magnetic fields is the original BEST version ...
:)
songbird707 4 years ago 5
I've been looking for something a little more sublime that features this song. Very well done.
tixntvdotcom 4 years ago 3