Yo, yo, this is how the rap goes, so ya better listen up or imma blow your cap off, yea yea all these people everywhere everyday, they never see the nice side of meh, yea, cause imma take take and all these people want to shake shake!
a lifetime of suffering would be too good for that bitch. i hope one of her kids dies. except the retard, he will do more damage to her alive then dead
I say the rep ticket should be palin/backman for 2012 that would be a trip , that would make for historic Tv moments . Newt is faking electable right now the man is Cheney/Rove/Delay/Abermoff/TortureRumfeld in one .if you think W was bad Newt makes W look like Chomsky .but Palin /Backman that would be historic
I love how conservatives mock people for getting an education. Elitist, please, grit, you are clueless. Not to mention a tool for corporate fascists. What you have against the middle class and poor? sounds like you enjoy classwarfare, how elitist.When you can think for yourself maybe people can take you seriously, but i already know what your going to say because all i have to do is watch 5 minutes of fox to know the talking points. And yet sadly, you still haven't figured it out.
@julianlev And CBS uses ? Image of Bush's book purposefully replaced by spoof cover "Desision Point" or "how i never made a good decision in eight years"
The subject of this video is Sarah Palin.And the real truth isn't that she quit Alaska. She did however, make a difficult decision to resign her office in order to help the Conservative movement in this country. When it happened it was no surprise to us conservatives and it should even be clear to everyone else by now. Oh yea that's right, it's just the liberal spin in overdrive that created that fallacy. But just like most of their rants, it doesn't hold water.
But it's not about being smarter. It's about common decency, common sense, respect for life, fiscal responsibly, liberty, freedom, love of country, honesty. I could go on but you get my point. Fact-The Obama admin. has done nothing good for this country. In fact he has even widened the racial gap and put us into an unsustainable debt. He's trying to establish socialism & he refuses to listen to the majority. Talk about being an elitist, corrupt, megalomaniac! George Soros must be so proud.
That probably doesn't surprise many--liberals are commonly eletists that think they're better and smarter than the "commoners". They believe that everyone who isn't a progressive/eletist/liberal/democrat needs to be "controlled" because those people are too stupid to think for themselves. And you're an excellant example of that...
Why waste the resources of 11 people fact checking that dumb broad? We all know she's stupid, get over it and move on, you're just doing it for the publicity or the ratings..
Oh, and Obama's pronouncing "corps" as "corpse"--just makes him so smart--roflol ! It appears as though his not being able to read a teleprompter and not being able to do math (as revealed in his health care plan) aren't the only "qualities" that make him so special...
I agree with Fox on this screw up. Why waste 11 employees time with Palins book. Even the cover is mispelled this further shows her what a retard she is. Lets get past this idiot already.
But who really cares about such trivialities? I'd say that all of the gaffs made-by just about everyone in this current administration-FAR out weighs anything else! The American people deserve better--people who have actually HAD A REAL JOB--and are capable of doing REAL MATH--not the "fuzzy math" that we've been given this past year.
Theirs Sarah Palin's conservative book Going Rogue, then a book of liberal essays counteracting what Palin says called Going Rouge. It is Satire, and it was so good it even tricked the fair and balanced channel FOX News lol.
First off shut your mousth you liberal Jungue. You are so stupid! The book they aired said "Going Rouge" its spelled "Going Rogue" They are completely different! Maybe if you were republican you might be a bit more intelligent. But at the same time you probably went to a community college, un- like me i went to an Ivy League college
First of if you did go to an ivy league school then you would spell mouth instead of mousth lol lmfao lol !!!! and if you have google on your pc then you know that there are two book dumb ass. going rogue "gue" and going rouge one is her book the other is a satire book and i am not liberal i am just a human. why do all the right wingers say "you are a liberal" if you don't agree with them or see things their way. Once again going rogue is one book and rouge is the other WOW Ivy league school not
@ajustin672 hahahah you think Republicans are smarter than Democrats. I went to a very good college as well (as a finance major, so not liberal arts), and 60% of the students there were liberal. Acting like all liberals are dumb community college students just makes you look like an idiot.
Then again I guess it saves me the effort of having to point it out.
So liberals dominate the campus? Wow, big surprise there. (NOT) Sounds like a typical graduate from "Cloward & Piven" College. Just crash the entire system by financially overwhelming it--so then you have to "re-boot" it with Marxism, Socialism, etc. Geez, those "commoners" are so danged stupid.......
My point is that acting like members of one political party are smarter than another is really stupid because there's no way you can back it up.
I went to NYU Stern, which last I checked wasn't exactly a haven of ivy league hippies. Greenspan is an alma mater (and he was awful in my opinion largely because his support of deregulation contributed to the current crisis).
Read the book IF you can liberal America! She quit bein Gov cuz the ethics committee run her legal bill to 500k didn't have time to do the job and the expense on lame duck BS allegations getting expensive! Carry on with yer corperate puppet too dumb to know he's such. When the bottom does fall out stay the hell outa my garden! Let's see-170 yards to the y in the road-gotta hold OVER 1 inch to pop that button w/87gr.psp. Get the picture? DUH! Horses, smokeless powder, Sarah, thumbs up!!!
But if you google it 43% of the people who brought this book going Rouge instead of Going rogue thought it was the same book so go figure even her supporters are stupid :D
Interesting, I thought the title of the video pretty much explained it. Rather than displaying the book Palin "wrote" entitled 'Going Rogue' (you know, a nod to her maverick ways) the book in this video is 'Going Rouge' (i.e. a shade of red for, say, lipstick).
it is real book called going rouge which is a totally different word from Rogue and....nevermind you are a palin supporter look just google it stupid ever heard of Mullan rouge no wonder she is getting support birds of a feather lol!!
The Associated Press had to "comb threw her book" because Palin's ideological braintwin, Fox News, does things like mistakenly put up a picture of the parody book. Whoops. Fox needs to fact-check its broadcasts
Well, It looks like FoxNews does not feel Sarah Palin can win LOL. so they are attempting to get her out of the way quickly. As far as fact checker stuff, I think Fox news could use some independent fact checkers. Palin is a gold mine for comedy, almost as good as George Bush!
I know- what's with the open disdain for "fact checkers"? I thought journalists fact-checked everything. Oh I forgot, opinions are true no matter what, no need not be fact-checked.
neither. No argument over the last Iranian Revolution being nutso. I stand corrected about the Egyptians but let's not pretend none of them or their backers were Saudi. No argument over the basis of each of these two dangers. I believe that if the Iranian people as a culture would be easier to deal with than the Saudi people as a culture if the Iranian govt wasn't batshit crazy and corrupt. They seem to know this and Ahmadinejad plays the part. He's like an Iranian Bush.
"Iranian Bush"hahahahaha good one! really was. I agree that on a whole the Iranian people would be MUCH easier to deal with than Saudis. We both agree that both lead to reginal instability. The Iranian problem that can be fixed in time, while the Saudis problem is ingrained. No matter what the govt. of saudi does there will always be citizens willing to support Terror. While perhaps the same thing could be said of Iran, i dont think you will see it nearly as high. Good conversation!
You too ended up being more intelligent than I initially thought, so touche'. You & I were simply looking through 2 different prisms of govt vs. society. Iran has not forgotten how great and rich its past was in its height. S.A. never had as much going for it in this sense. I think Iranians are so fed up that they are ready for not only political revolution but a (I hate to use these two words together) cultural revolution (not the Chinese type).
Thank you. Yes I agree we're looking at the same problem through different angles. Yes if the Iranians ever shed thier govt that country will be ripe for a cultural revolution. Where they discover their rather glorious history. From a religous stand up not too many people can say they influence both Abrahamic faiths as well as Hinduism. S.A. is sadly a very "conservative society" and i think will more inclined towards terror. Yes one day the Iranians will be a free and open society.
You're fucKing stupid... trying to sound all superior to everyone else on youtube... you're not. Fox News showed the wrong book... the book they showed was a parody book destroying Palin... at the bottom of the book it reads "An Amerikan nightmare"
Well excuse me for not knowing one small thing in the political world. Politics should die anyway...I'd rather live in anarchy than under this socialist, fascist, imperialistic gov't.
Fuck Fox News (and the media altogether), fuck the gov't and fuck this entire american society. It's no wonder why the entire world hates America...[as a whole, not individually (there's some people that don't fit this)] we're a bunch of dumb bullies that can't figure out anything to save our lives.
Go to 0:30 and look at the book, they spelled it "Rouge." Which is weird, if what they are showing is her book, why would it be spelled differently. Were they editing the book cover with photoshop or something?
no... the cover they showed is the "parody" book which mocks Palin's book.. Palin's book is "Rogue", the take-off is "Rouge" - very similar names & covers... SP's book has blue skies & a pic of her smiling, note that the Rouge cover has thunderclouds & lightning in the background & a pic of her smiling...
well........... there's a parody pretty much about EVERYTHING in Palin's life isn't there???? her LIFE might in fact be a parody!! can't tell what's real and what's not anymore...
"Going ROGUE: An American Life" is Sarah Palin's book... then there's a 2nd book (which is the one shown by Fox) titled "Going ROUGE: An American Nightmare" which is "a collection of critical essays about Palin with a title and cover design mimicking Palins memoir".
p.s. Ron Reagan's autobio was titled "An American Life" so she's got some nerve hasn't she???
I think the real issue is whether or not one believes the Iranians will ever solve their problems with corrupt government and loonies in high places.
The answer probably depends on how much help they get from outside the country, because I think you are right about the fact that they cannot do it on their own in the short term.
These younger generations of Iranians are going to want something different from what they have right now. I hope they get it.
Wow you are really a dolt rehashing my entire point for me again and for the second time misunderstanding my characterization of moderate Iranian citizens to be an endorsement of Ahmendinejad & the mullahs reign in some sort of Disneyland scenario. I said that Iran is a threat to be dealt with but Saudi is a different but also insidious threat . You are Saudi, Sunni, or simply determined to argue that you are right even though we basically agree- like a dog also humping the arm of a couch.
Let me know when those moderate citizens are running the country. Just like i want you to let me know when the govt. of Saudi starts sponsoring terrorism. And how is Saudi so insidious? Sorry if you have a hard time dealing with fact. and also sorry you're only entertainment is Fox News and dogs huming sofas. Could explain your reasoning skills
At least we agree that Fox News is drivel. But the economic might & influence of Saudi far surpasses Iran's. Bin Laden & all the mujahedin (syncronized with the Taliban) were Saudi. 90% of the "foreign fighters" in Iraq were Sunni and overwhelmingly Saudi. Saudi money financed most Palestinian terrorism through the last two decades. Iran may have traceable support for the terrorism against marine barracks, Navy ships & embassies- but its Wacky Wahhabis (e.g. Sunnis) backing the worst terrorism.
Heres where you're wrong. Most of Al Qaida are eypgtians, not Saudis. Thats a complete myth because the 9/11 hijackers were from there. But Al Qaida emerge from the Eygpt's Tazim ,who came from Eygpts Muslim Brotherhood(oldest islamic terror group). None the less you make my arguement for me, the money comes from Saudis, not the govt. While the Iranian govt. finances terror, while its citizens do not. Iranian taught Hamas their first suicide attacks also Wahhabis are a danger, but not a govt!
... and by worst, I mean, bombing of schools, marketplaces full of women & the elderly, public buses, clinics, hospitals... Iran is also dirty but they bomb military / political targets because Shiites are not so irrational as to believe that bombing schools will win them any support. Yes Iran is crazy enough to think that terrorism is a legitimate strategy to employ. They're very secretive about it - they know that it is a shameful & desperate tactic; sunnis dance in open celebration of it.
as for Shia not being crazy like Sunni, i suggest you read "Red Shia Black Shia" by Ali Shariati. He is the man responsible for the intellucual fire of the Iranian revolution. Then get back to about whos really crazy. In Iraq the Iranians also sponsor Shia groups to commit terror. And Hezollah didnt bomb military targets during the conflict with Isreal, they just shot rockets into Hafia. Both are dangers, but one danger is headed by a govt. the other is by citizens.
Hezbollah did attempt to make all sorts of flawed rationalizations that since Israel takes military action, it was acceptable to lob missiles willy nilly into the country hoping they could hit the right targets- but in reality I agree that they crossed the line from Level 1 crazy into Level 2 "markets & schools" crazy. But we can't always attribute every action by a group with a country they got money /supplies from. Obviously such groups "Go Rogue", and when they do, the backers run for cover.
I really think the Iranians wanted to use Hezbollah as a war by proxy with Isreal. and they also wanted to show the Isrealis they were not unbeatable. But when we look at Sunnis vs Shia, Sunni talk about having a country govern by the Sharia, while only the Shia have achieved this. Afghanistan was briefly like this also with the Taliban. But once the govt. of Iran is removed we will see rapid changes. And their will no for Hezbollah to "Go Rogue" on!(nice pun btw)
The same could be said for Saudi. Once the government is removed there would be rapid changes- in the wrong direction. But you are right, the prospects are that both governments will be in power for a while. I'm sure western intelligence works hard to tip that scale. Remember that US-based Skype and Twitter were the comlink & media outlet for the recent rebellion in Iran. ;] Sharia law>half of a given population locked down, uneducated, abused > economic stagnation circa the Stone Age.
If the Saudis didnt have any oil the country would be the same as it was at the time of Muhammad. While Iran has always been a engaged society, the Persians traditional have a higher cultural exposure. So we cant be shocked that they are more inclined towards democracy. But if the oil dried up tommorrow in SA you have alot of mad,uneducated people sitting on a bunch sand.
@AbelNOON Actually, their ratings are dropping. MSNBC's ratings are increasing. And yet, we just had this election that would seem to shopw the contrary.
The stock market dropped 28% under Bush, not reaching the level when he took office until Sept. 15th of this year. Call it a lost economic decade. Those are the FACTS! And yet, Obama & the Democrats get the blame. iS THIS A STUPID COUNTRY OR WHAT?
What on earth does "We've corrected that now" mean? The statement is simply not true. Seems like the deed was already done, unless they have a time machine. It's like statements like that can erase or revise history and memory in some parallel reality. They make statements like this all the time on that channel.
Rouge is make-up you put on your cheeks. Rogue, if not a noun, is used as a verb to describe someone going their own way, usually against the mainstream.
"Going Rouge" is an unflattering satire of Palin. "Going Rogue" is Palin's failed attempt to appear sophisticated and literate.
This is a blatant conspiracy by the lib media to minimalize Ms.Palins political currency by deceivingly attaching sexism to her by this obviously planned "accident"!
Huh? Oh, Fox isn't a lib outlet? Sorry, accidents do happen, no harm done.
How come 99% of the comments about fox news are about how it's an 'epic fail' or how it's 'bullshit' - yet its the most watched news station in america? Are you all fucking hypocrites? If it's so shit, stop watching it!
It's not even close to being the most watched station. ABC, NBC, and CBS News stations average 7 Millions viewers every single night. Even Katie Couric gets 3 Million MORE viewers than O'Reilly. Cable News doesn't even come close the regular station News.
FOX News Ranks 1 in prime time with 3.4 million viewers. TBS is two, USA is three, ESPN is four, CNN is fifth, MSNBC placed ninth. During the daytime, FOX comes in second to Nickelodeon, CNN places ninth and MSNBC places fifteenth. Don't believe me? Look it up. Sorry, but you told a lie. And O'reilly Is the most watched but you could work for him or Couric! LOL
@rickrocker Hey numbers guy, I got a hoot for ya. Dancing with the Stars has been number one in it's time slot so does that mean it is the best most worthwhile show to watch? Hell no. It means that this show is popular and thought to be very entertaining. Does that sound familiar?
Oh, I see what you're trying to say. You think I said something was more worth while to watch. What did I say that was more worth while to watch? I just told dfwtexxaas that his figures were wrong. You seem to think I said something else.
Numbers show that driving while consuming alcohol promotes a greater risk of injury or death to the driver and/or others. Numbers also show that drivers are more likely to get pulled over at 2 am for DUI which is why you see less drunks on the road today vs 1980. Numbers show medical professionals that chemo can can send cancer into remission and that cannaboids actually prevent lung cancer. Numbers are what make cases which is what ALL news media use but not always properly interpreted.
@rickrocker And as all professionals who use numbers know they can be padded faked and bullshitted and using numbers to argue your point on Youtube is like jerking off, although it feels good, it's ultimately meaningless and you haven't shared a thing with anyone.
I respect your idea that numbers don't always reveal the whole picture, but at the same time you can't prove things based on feelings, you've got to have facts to back up your claims + logical thinking to understand what the numbers mean and what they don't mean.
I'm not arguing an opinion. I'm presenting facts. You may formulate your own opinions around them as I have and you may even ask me for mine if you wish but the facts remain facts. One last thing for you to think about is why would you tell me that if I was to argue my opinion on youtube is meaningless when you are so quick to share yours?
@rickrocker I said using numbers to argue a point/opinion on Youtube is meaningless mostly because the info can't always be backed up or debated. I didn't say anyones opinion is meaningless.
Then what would YOU use to make your opinions, points, comments, or statements strong? I have numbers. If you don't beleive my numbers, I invite you to research them and show me I am incorrect. I based my numbers on a research organization, you may look them up if you wish.
this was the fact check thats the best they could do dont you think if they actually lied like GE i mean NBC does, the left censored youtubers would be the first to show it
What statements of FOX news have been false and never retracted? NBC is known for retractions and unreliable sources. CNN is race obsessed and the NY Times flat out lies.
So I wonder, where does Marine4Life51 get his/her news updates from?
Washington Post, NYTimes, Wall Street Journal. As for your 2nd statement about fox news. You're on the internet bro, it's all over the place, all you have to do is look.
Really, 'bro'? So you take your news from anywhere on the Internet? How well informed you must be.
As for your Washington Post, NYTimes, and Wall Street Journal. Besides having a liberal bias, what makes those three different than FOX? Besides that the NYTimes prints its 'facts' without checking them?
Don't try telling me the Wall Street Journal isn't liberal, I read it too. While the editorials are moderately conservative, the news pages are worse than the NYTimes.
by anywhere on the internet...well you're already on youtube. You want to find fox news lies, it's really not that hard. There's really no way to spin video evidence if you don't cut stuff out. As for your other commments...alright, you give me more reliable news sources and i'll check them out.
Again, show me them lying. They are all as reliable as the next, they get their information from the same places. It's all how they present it. Furthermore, check the article "Media Bias is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist".
Reporters stirring up rallies? Yes, CNN when they said they didn't see one black person in a crowd, implying racism. What reporter stirred up a rally besides Rick Santelli at CNBC?
and the wall street journal is conservative, even if you don't think it is. As for what separates fox news from those...i could give tons of examples but have you ever heard of reporters from any of those newspapers stirring up protesters at a rally?
If you think Palin is an idiot, look at the mess these briliant politicians have us in. Oh wait, you're still blaming Bush. Anyway, these elitist career politicians have dug us in such a hole 'cause they're so far out of touch with the real world it's a joke. At this point I'd rather have a down to earth white conservative woman than a snobish black or white, man or woman, liberal or conservative. Brains makes not a wise leader. Wisdom (common sense) makes a leader. Besides, she aint dumb.
since when has palin been "down to earth" and "in touch" with the American population at large? and by "common sense" and "wisdom" do you mean not being able to give a straight answer when Katie Couric asks here what periodicals, newspapers, and magazines she likes to read?
U don't get what I mean. My point is that while some think she's a joke ...
... what? And the politicians that lead us now are not? I'm not saying Palin is "the one," I'm just saying we should stop thinking these smooth talkers have our best interest at heart. Our representatives are set for the rest of their lives. The rest of us, we'll be swimming in the mess they've created for a long time. And yeah, down to earth. She hasn't been tainted by Washington, at least, not yet.
Politics is messed up and of course we definitely have a lot of incompetents and ignoramuses in government. I've watched most of her interviews and the vice presidential debates. She clearly is a joke. Just because she shares your principles and acts all folksy and shit, doesn't make her a competent leader.
Hey, don't get me wrong. I still love this nation. But when we start killing our finest men and women like in Ft Hood, something's wrong. Yes, we not that Muslim. We killed then because our leaders are afraid to call a spade a spade. We killed them because of political correctness. Sounds like a whole new subject, but it's not. We need real leaders again. We as a nation also need to get our backbone back.
what spade hasn't been called a spade? and i'm just confused as to what political correctness has to do with fort hood. what do u think should have been done?
We haven't had a real leader since the days of JFK. The mass media keeps the population distracted with worthless shit like Palin while the country goes further and further down the shitter thanks to the Federal Reserve and it's allies.
I can't wait till Ron Paul's HR 1207 goes through. The Fed is going to have to answer some questions and people will go to jail. Gold price is going to hit the roof. LOL
I'm not a Democrat or Republican, but I don't see Reagan as a true president because of some of his policies. He started the war on drugs, which has gotten over 100 innocent civillians killed, he allowed the arms companies to supply both sides in the Iran Iraq War, He increased military spending needlessly and he practed trickle down economics. While it's true he made Americans feel good about their country again, I think it was at a very high cost. Check out this clip watch?v=QTcL6Xc_eMM
It's the CEO of Merril Lynch ordering Reagan to 'speed up' his speech so tax cuts for the wealthy can be passed. NOONE should talk to a US president like that, let alone some corporate rat. It makes me angry to hear him boss Reagan around like that, just like it made me angry to see Obama bow before the fat pig they call the King of Saudi Arabia.
damn guys kind of old now. What are so disgruntled island shia? or do you think he is part of a vast shadow govt hell bent on world domination???? ZOG lives right?
There are plenty of reasons to hate Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. He rules his country like a feudal lord of the middle ages, promotes extremist Wahhabism around the world through kingdom- funded madrassas, oppresses women and disenters brutally and last but not least the shitbag has the audacity to suggest that Saudi Arabia should receive 'reparations' after it's oil is gone. In all honesty the man deserves to be broken on a wheel.
I don't care what sort of postulations or gesticulations presidents make toward other world leaders. It's all manipulative showmanship. What I really care about is policy and action. Numbers don't lie. Saudi Arabia plays the role of, in an economic and moral sense, our abusive pimp. We need to get away from Saudi even if it means courting moderate Iran (Yes those are the many people protesting in Iran right now).
"moderate Iran" the people who sponsor the most terrorist on the planet? Yes the citizens of Iran are quite moderate, but they dont control anything. I totally agree with your words about Saudi, but courting Iran isnt the solution at all. Not to mention there are no refinerys in Iran, so that means we would have to import it, and refine here on our shores. And no one in the US wants a refinery in their backyard. Sorry but courting Iran isnt a solution, its just more headaches.
I think you are playing a rhetorical shell game by suggesting (if facetiously) that I would for even a moment consider Ahmedinejad's clowns "moderate". And this goes well beyond oil. If we truly believe in fighting for freedom and democracy in addition to our own interests, then we should be planning to confront Iran both diplomatically and militarily.
But the strategic danger they present in light of their ties to Russia is very real.
hmm you said moderate Iran, not me. so perhaps you're palying a game with yourself. And if we believe in Freedom we wouldnt be in Iran we would be in Darfur, or Burma. But if we're interested in economics, then we should engage Iran. Sorry but your post lack depth
Uh-huh, you did indeed parse (with a lack of understanding) over use of the phrase 'moderate Iran', if we're talking about stability in the mideast then Burma etc. has nothing to do with this discussion. Sunni Saudi is ten times more wacko than Shiite Iran. I consider Iran a "lesser evil" with a large, active moderate faction that has obviously been able to put its government on the defensive. Sorry but you seem to be more interested in playing clever games than staying focused on the issues.
You are severe fooling yopurself about Iran. You may have people in the Saudi govt who give money to terrorist, while the STATE OF IRAN sponsors Terrorism. Not so sure whats moderate about that. And since you like the word stability, IRAN is the one build a nuclear weapon not Saudi. But this will touch off a Arab or Mideast arms race,with Saudi and Eygpt wanting the bomb next. And i dont think Isreal will be too happy about that. So once again your points make zero sense.
Now that's funny . . . LOL Should have got those 14 fact checkers to check your facts too.
SeanMBryans 2 weeks ago in playlist Fox News Mistakes
Fox News IS the mainstream media.
MendingMedia 6 months ago 2
F0RG3T TH!$ M4N, !MM4 B3 4 JABBAWOKEE!!!!!!!
BlueDevilStrong1227 7 months ago
Yo, yo, this is how the rap goes, so ya better listen up or imma blow your cap off, yea yea all these people everywhere everyday, they never see the nice side of meh, yea, cause imma take take and all these people want to shake shake!
BlueDevilStrong1227 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrResilire =gay name. See how that worked out for ya.
BlueDevilStrong1227 7 months ago
@MrResilier =gay name. See how that worked out for ya.
BlueDevilStrong1227 7 months ago
a lifetime of suffering would be too good for that bitch. i hope one of her kids dies. except the retard, he will do more damage to her alive then dead
kakashi76767 8 months ago
Obama/Biden= Osama Bin Laden
BlueDevilStrong1227 8 months ago
@BlueDevilStrong1227 = Retarded. See how your logic works?
MrResilire 7 months ago
I say the rep ticket should be palin/backman for 2012 that would be a trip , that would make for historic Tv moments . Newt is faking electable right now the man is Cheney/Rove/Delay/Abermoff/TortureRumfeld in one .if you think W was bad Newt makes W look like Chomsky .but Palin /Backman that would be historic
EdugeBDroN 11 months ago
No one ever accused Fox Noise of having many literate people working there.
peraspira 11 months ago
That was the original book cover before a ten year old spelled it correctly for Sarah.
fearguis 1 year ago 11
The National Enquirer is fun but few think it is true I know way too many people think Obama's trip to India cost $200.000.000 a day
ohwnou 1 year ago
Why would 11 fact checkers be assigned??? Oh I don't know, perhaps because that is what investigative reporting is all about....
voodooy2k 1 year ago
"Graphics error," my ass. Pox News simply fucked up -- they didn't bother to double-check their own work, which is so very typical of all they do.
Buncha half-brained slimeballs.
Oops...... didn't mean to offend all the half-brained slimeballs out there by comparing them to Pox News...
p3snooper 1 year ago
Faux News
AziMeX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I NEVER WATCH FOX NEWS
fraterlucifer888 1 year ago
Is that... Rosie O'Donnell?
flibberswooper0 1 year ago
I love how conservatives mock people for getting an education. Elitist, please, grit, you are clueless. Not to mention a tool for corporate fascists. What you have against the middle class and poor? sounds like you enjoy classwarfare, how elitist.When you can think for yourself maybe people can take you seriously, but i already know what your going to say because all i have to do is watch 5 minutes of fox to know the talking points. And yet sadly, you still haven't figured it out.
brokengrrl1980 1 year ago
Why is this on the Internet? This is so inconsequentional. Thank you for wasting 55 seconds of my life.
smiledammit24 1 year ago
I think Fox News could use eleven fact checkers
oh who am I kidding most of the crap they do is on purpose anyway
julianlev 1 year ago 14
@julianlev fAUX "nEWS" EMPLOYS FART CHECKERS. They were hired by the same person that put that book cover on the screen.
gumpydoood 1 year ago
@julianlev And CBS uses ? Image of Bush's book purposefully replaced by spoof cover "Desision Point" or "how i never made a good decision in eight years"
Tankernazi 1 year ago
The subject of this video is Sarah Palin.And the real truth isn't that she quit Alaska. She did however, make a difficult decision to resign her office in order to help the Conservative movement in this country. When it happened it was no surprise to us conservatives and it should even be clear to everyone else by now. Oh yea that's right, it's just the liberal spin in overdrive that created that fallacy. But just like most of their rants, it doesn't hold water.
gritsandgreens1971 1 year ago
But it's not about being smarter. It's about common decency, common sense, respect for life, fiscal responsibly, liberty, freedom, love of country, honesty. I could go on but you get my point. Fact-The Obama admin. has done nothing good for this country. In fact he has even widened the racial gap and put us into an unsustainable debt. He's trying to establish socialism & he refuses to listen to the majority. Talk about being an elitist, corrupt, megalomaniac! George Soros must be so proud.
gritsandgreens1971 1 year ago
@BenkaiDebussy
That probably doesn't surprise many--liberals are commonly eletists that think they're better and smarter than the "commoners". They believe that everyone who isn't a progressive/eletist/liberal/democrat needs to be "controlled" because those people are too stupid to think for themselves. And you're an excellant example of that...
gritsandgreens1971 1 year ago
Why waste the resources of 11 people fact checking that dumb broad? We all know she's stupid, get over it and move on, you're just doing it for the publicity or the ratings..
leimeisei909 1 year ago
Oh, and Obama's pronouncing "corps" as "corpse"--just makes him so smart--roflol ! It appears as though his not being able to read a teleprompter and not being able to do math (as revealed in his health care plan) aren't the only "qualities" that make him so special...
gritsandgreens1971 1 year ago
Apparently since no one can answer your statements they just decided to give you a thumbs down. Cowards.
smiledammit24 1 year ago
I agree with Fox on this screw up. Why waste 11 employees time with Palins book. Even the cover is mispelled this further shows her what a retard she is. Lets get past this idiot already.
michp38 1 year ago
"Rogue" is Alaskan for "retard".
DrunkenPoetic 2 years ago
But who really cares about such trivialities? I'd say that all of the gaffs made-by just about everyone in this current administration-FAR out weighs anything else! The American people deserve better--people who have actually HAD A REAL JOB--and are capable of doing REAL MATH--not the "fuzzy math" that we've been given this past year.
gritsandgreens1971 2 years ago
yea like the great math skills bush had do you just say fuck what happen when bush was the obama you have a year to clean up 8
RedwineZetar 2 years ago
We've "corrected that now"? Too late lady! Yet another Fox fail.
jensen1901 2 years ago
Theirs Sarah Palin's conservative book Going Rogue, then a book of liberal essays counteracting what Palin says called Going Rouge. It is Satire, and it was so good it even tricked the fair and balanced channel FOX News lol.
chesstar75 2 years ago
they are no mistakes
DDazzle1 2 years ago
They spelled Rogue wrong. and it says an american nightmare at the bottom. which is incorrect! PALIN IN AWESOME!! lUV YA SARAH!!
ajustin672 2 years ago
going rouge you idot is correct spelling do you know what rouge is, it is not rogue but then again you are a sarah palin supporter so nevermind lol!!
RedwineZetar 2 years ago
First off shut your mousth you liberal Jungue. You are so stupid! The book they aired said "Going Rouge" its spelled "Going Rogue" They are completely different! Maybe if you were republican you might be a bit more intelligent. But at the same time you probably went to a community college, un- like me i went to an Ivy League college
ajustin672 2 years ago
First of if you did go to an ivy league school then you would spell mouth instead of mousth lol lmfao lol !!!! and if you have google on your pc then you know that there are two book dumb ass. going rogue "gue" and going rouge one is her book the other is a satire book and i am not liberal i am just a human. why do all the right wingers say "you are a liberal" if you don't agree with them or see things their way. Once again going rogue is one book and rouge is the other WOW Ivy league school not
RedwineZetar 2 years ago
Harvad Graduate. The 'r' on my laptop is stuck ok. and you gave a wong spelling of rogue. What is "Rue"?.....libeal
ajustin672 2 years ago
i guess the r is stuck too lol what is libeal and harvad wtf you are stupid school has let you down lol where is harvad lol
RedwineZetar 2 years ago
First off im smarter than ull ever be lol sorry but at least i know whee harvad is and you should know what a liberal is
ajustin672 2 years ago
@ajustin672 hahahah you think Republicans are smarter than Democrats. I went to a very good college as well (as a finance major, so not liberal arts), and 60% of the students there were liberal. Acting like all liberals are dumb community college students just makes you look like an idiot.
Then again I guess it saves me the effort of having to point it out.
BenkaiDebussy 1 year ago
So liberals dominate the campus? Wow, big surprise there. (NOT) Sounds like a typical graduate from "Cloward & Piven" College. Just crash the entire system by financially overwhelming it--so then you have to "re-boot" it with Marxism, Socialism, etc. Geez, those "commoners" are so danged stupid.......
gritsandgreens1971 1 year ago
My point is that acting like members of one political party are smarter than another is really stupid because there's no way you can back it up.
I went to NYU Stern, which last I checked wasn't exactly a haven of ivy league hippies. Greenspan is an alma mater (and he was awful in my opinion largely because his support of deregulation contributed to the current crisis).
BenkaiDebussy 1 year ago
Read the book IF you can liberal America! She quit bein Gov cuz the ethics committee run her legal bill to 500k didn't have time to do the job and the expense on lame duck BS allegations getting expensive! Carry on with yer corperate puppet too dumb to know he's such. When the bottom does fall out stay the hell outa my garden! Let's see-170 yards to the y in the road-gotta hold OVER 1 inch to pop that button w/87gr.psp. Get the picture? DUH! Horses, smokeless powder, Sarah, thumbs up!!!
FBIundercover51 2 years ago
i got my mom this book for christmas
BillyandBarry 2 years ago
the original cover shows a bright sky, this one is dark and stormy
also at the bottom it says "an american nightmare" instead of "an american life"
HoleFrijole 2 years ago
But if you google it 43% of the people who brought this book going Rouge instead of Going rogue thought it was the same book so go figure even her supporters are stupid :D
RedwineZetar 2 years ago
whats wrong is they think any one cares
rmcbeigh 2 years ago
I dont get it. What is exactly wrong here?
teagarden8650 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnidamoZero 2 years ago
@teagarden8650
Interesting, I thought the title of the video pretty much explained it. Rather than displaying the book Palin "wrote" entitled 'Going Rogue' (you know, a nod to her maverick ways) the book in this video is 'Going Rouge' (i.e. a shade of red for, say, lipstick).
brouge11 2 years ago
shes a dumb bitch and people want to read her filth, thats whats wrong.
Rshimy 2 years ago
they spelt "rogue" wrong.
NinjaBob23 2 years ago
it is real book called going rouge which is a totally different word from Rogue and....nevermind you are a palin supporter look just google it stupid ever heard of Mullan rouge no wonder she is getting support birds of a feather lol!!
RedwineZetar 2 years ago
The Associated Press had to "comb threw her book" because Palin's ideological braintwin, Fox News, does things like mistakenly put up a picture of the parody book. Whoops. Fox needs to fact-check its broadcasts
flutist102090 2 years ago 2
Ha ha! She's "Going Red!"
adeleellie6 2 years ago
LOL!
DigitalAquarius 2 years ago
Well, It looks like FoxNews does not feel Sarah Palin can win LOL. so they are attempting to get her out of the way quickly. As far as fact checker stuff, I think Fox news could use some independent fact checkers. Palin is a gold mine for comedy, almost as good as George Bush!
YankeeTom63 2 years ago
I know- what's with the open disdain for "fact checkers"? I thought journalists fact-checked everything. Oh I forgot, opinions are true no matter what, no need not be fact-checked.
maximilian333 2 years ago
sorry did you call me a Saudi or a Wahab???
hailung23 2 years ago
neither. No argument over the last Iranian Revolution being nutso. I stand corrected about the Egyptians but let's not pretend none of them or their backers were Saudi. No argument over the basis of each of these two dangers. I believe that if the Iranian people as a culture would be easier to deal with than the Saudi people as a culture if the Iranian govt wasn't batshit crazy and corrupt. They seem to know this and Ahmadinejad plays the part. He's like an Iranian Bush.
maximilian333 2 years ago
"Iranian Bush"hahahahaha good one! really was. I agree that on a whole the Iranian people would be MUCH easier to deal with than Saudis. We both agree that both lead to reginal instability. The Iranian problem that can be fixed in time, while the Saudis problem is ingrained. No matter what the govt. of saudi does there will always be citizens willing to support Terror. While perhaps the same thing could be said of Iran, i dont think you will see it nearly as high. Good conversation!
hailung23 2 years ago
You too ended up being more intelligent than I initially thought, so touche'. You & I were simply looking through 2 different prisms of govt vs. society. Iran has not forgotten how great and rich its past was in its height. S.A. never had as much going for it in this sense. I think Iranians are so fed up that they are ready for not only political revolution but a (I hate to use these two words together) cultural revolution (not the Chinese type).
maximilian333 2 years ago
Thank you. Yes I agree we're looking at the same problem through different angles. Yes if the Iranians ever shed thier govt that country will be ripe for a cultural revolution. Where they discover their rather glorious history. From a religous stand up not too many people can say they influence both Abrahamic faiths as well as Hinduism. S.A. is sadly a very "conservative society" and i think will more inclined towards terror. Yes one day the Iranians will be a free and open society.
hailung23 2 years ago
fox news finally gets something right, and then they correct it
masonprof 2 years ago
Hey madisyn, if those pics of you are REALLY you..then hot damn, you have a nice body. How much do you charge for a sexy time?
Dire327 2 years ago
Oh those stupid conservatives, making a simple mistake between two words which are so spelled similarly it's an honest mistake to mix them up.
CHANGE!
hossrex 2 years ago
OK, so since nobody I can see of any comments on here can apparently understand the slip-up...let an educated person set it straight for you...
The title of her book is "Going Rogue". Fox News had the graphic up showing the book titled as "Going Rouge".
"Rogue", by definition in verb form, is to "operate outside normal or desirable controls".
"Rouge", by definition, is "any of various red cosmetics for coloring the cheeks or lips".
The mistake was the spelling in the graphic.
ViperR1069 2 years ago
@ViperR1069
You're fucKing stupid... trying to sound all superior to everyone else on youtube... you're not. Fox News showed the wrong book... the book they showed was a parody book destroying Palin... at the bottom of the book it reads "An Amerikan nightmare"
ViperR1069 is wrong on so many levels.
shaggylee122 2 years ago
@shaggylee122
Well excuse me for not knowing one small thing in the political world. Politics should die anyway...I'd rather live in anarchy than under this socialist, fascist, imperialistic gov't.
Fuck Fox News (and the media altogether), fuck the gov't and fuck this entire american society. It's no wonder why the entire world hates America...[as a whole, not individually (there's some people that don't fit this)] we're a bunch of dumb bullies that can't figure out anything to save our lives.
ViperR1069 2 years ago
why did AP assign 11 journalists? Cause it was a huge pile of bullshit.
I mean, seriously. Let's have an adult discussion. It doesn't matter if it takes 11 police or 1 to nab a robber, the robber is still doing wrong.
Sarah Palin wants to lie in ways that are easy to catch, that's her choice, but don't blame the cops for going after the robbers.
thirdrobot 2 years ago
can someone please explain the mistake to me?
Isn't "Going Rogue" the name of her book?
So then what's the mistake?
freezazoid 2 years ago
Go to 0:30 and look at the book, they spelled it "Rouge." Which is weird, if what they are showing is her book, why would it be spelled differently. Were they editing the book cover with photoshop or something?
Dire327 2 years ago
no... the cover they showed is the "parody" book which mocks Palin's book.. Palin's book is "Rogue", the take-off is "Rouge" - very similar names & covers... SP's book has blue skies & a pic of her smiling, note that the Rouge cover has thunderclouds & lightning in the background & a pic of her smiling...
Agnelum1 2 years ago
I just so happened to be here on youtube when you posted that Agnelum, which is why I'm replying so fast.
Thanks for clearing that up, I honestly had no idea that there was a parody book based on Palins.
Dire327 2 years ago
well........... there's a parody pretty much about EVERYTHING in Palin's life isn't there???? her LIFE might in fact be a parody!! can't tell what's real and what's not anymore...
Agnelum1 2 years ago
From the vid, it looks like they showed the book "Going Rouge" which is the wrong one.. And the mistake is that they accidentally showed it. I think.
heroesfandom 2 years ago
"Going ROGUE: An American Life" is Sarah Palin's book... then there's a 2nd book (which is the one shown by Fox) titled "Going ROUGE: An American Nightmare" which is "a collection of critical essays about Palin with a title and cover design mimicking Palins memoir".
p.s. Ron Reagan's autobio was titled "An American Life" so she's got some nerve hasn't she???
Agnelum1 2 years ago
Did Faux "News" get its blatant incompetence from BushCult or vice versa? IAE, seems to run in the family. Clowns all.
armadilloze 2 years ago
I think the real issue is whether or not one believes the Iranians will ever solve their problems with corrupt government and loonies in high places.
The answer probably depends on how much help they get from outside the country, because I think you are right about the fact that they cannot do it on their own in the short term.
These younger generations of Iranians are going to want something different from what they have right now. I hope they get it.
maximilian333 2 years ago
Wow you are really a dolt rehashing my entire point for me again and for the second time misunderstanding my characterization of moderate Iranian citizens to be an endorsement of Ahmendinejad & the mullahs reign in some sort of Disneyland scenario. I said that Iran is a threat to be dealt with but Saudi is a different but also insidious threat . You are Saudi, Sunni, or simply determined to argue that you are right even though we basically agree- like a dog also humping the arm of a couch.
maximilian333 2 years ago
Let me know when those moderate citizens are running the country. Just like i want you to let me know when the govt. of Saudi starts sponsoring terrorism. And how is Saudi so insidious? Sorry if you have a hard time dealing with fact. and also sorry you're only entertainment is Fox News and dogs huming sofas. Could explain your reasoning skills
hailung23 2 years ago
At least we agree that Fox News is drivel. But the economic might & influence of Saudi far surpasses Iran's. Bin Laden & all the mujahedin (syncronized with the Taliban) were Saudi. 90% of the "foreign fighters" in Iraq were Sunni and overwhelmingly Saudi. Saudi money financed most Palestinian terrorism through the last two decades. Iran may have traceable support for the terrorism against marine barracks, Navy ships & embassies- but its Wacky Wahhabis (e.g. Sunnis) backing the worst terrorism.
maximilian333 2 years ago
Heres where you're wrong. Most of Al Qaida are eypgtians, not Saudis. Thats a complete myth because the 9/11 hijackers were from there. But Al Qaida emerge from the Eygpt's Tazim ,who came from Eygpts Muslim Brotherhood(oldest islamic terror group). None the less you make my arguement for me, the money comes from Saudis, not the govt. While the Iranian govt. finances terror, while its citizens do not. Iranian taught Hamas their first suicide attacks also Wahhabis are a danger, but not a govt!
hailung23 2 years ago
... and by worst, I mean, bombing of schools, marketplaces full of women & the elderly, public buses, clinics, hospitals... Iran is also dirty but they bomb military / political targets because Shiites are not so irrational as to believe that bombing schools will win them any support. Yes Iran is crazy enough to think that terrorism is a legitimate strategy to employ. They're very secretive about it - they know that it is a shameful & desperate tactic; sunnis dance in open celebration of it.
maximilian333 2 years ago
as for Shia not being crazy like Sunni, i suggest you read "Red Shia Black Shia" by Ali Shariati. He is the man responsible for the intellucual fire of the Iranian revolution. Then get back to about whos really crazy. In Iraq the Iranians also sponsor Shia groups to commit terror. And Hezollah didnt bomb military targets during the conflict with Isreal, they just shot rockets into Hafia. Both are dangers, but one danger is headed by a govt. the other is by citizens.
hailung23 2 years ago
Hezbollah did attempt to make all sorts of flawed rationalizations that since Israel takes military action, it was acceptable to lob missiles willy nilly into the country hoping they could hit the right targets- but in reality I agree that they crossed the line from Level 1 crazy into Level 2 "markets & schools" crazy. But we can't always attribute every action by a group with a country they got money /supplies from. Obviously such groups "Go Rogue", and when they do, the backers run for cover.
maximilian333 2 years ago
I really think the Iranians wanted to use Hezbollah as a war by proxy with Isreal. and they also wanted to show the Isrealis they were not unbeatable. But when we look at Sunnis vs Shia, Sunni talk about having a country govern by the Sharia, while only the Shia have achieved this. Afghanistan was briefly like this also with the Taliban. But once the govt. of Iran is removed we will see rapid changes. And their will no for Hezbollah to "Go Rogue" on!(nice pun btw)
hailung23 2 years ago
The same could be said for Saudi. Once the government is removed there would be rapid changes- in the wrong direction. But you are right, the prospects are that both governments will be in power for a while. I'm sure western intelligence works hard to tip that scale. Remember that US-based Skype and Twitter were the comlink & media outlet for the recent rebellion in Iran. ;] Sharia law>half of a given population locked down, uneducated, abused > economic stagnation circa the Stone Age.
maximilian333 2 years ago
If the Saudis didnt have any oil the country would be the same as it was at the time of Muhammad. While Iran has always been a engaged society, the Persians traditional have a higher cultural exposure. So we cant be shocked that they are more inclined towards democracy. But if the oil dried up tommorrow in SA you have alot of mad,uneducated people sitting on a bunch sand.
hailung23 2 years ago
Comment removed
pinkpumpkinn 2 years ago
"An American Nightmare"
albalax88 2 years ago 2
FOX NEWS RULES THAT IS WHY!!!!
derek040585 2 years ago
where did they even get a clearly photo shopped cover of her book why would they have that to begin with???
MrFrankielike 2 years ago
Hay everyone, do you need extra money and I mean a lot of extra money. Get your free dvd and work book. go to my link and just check it out
johnmerendino 2 years ago
Man people are addicted to FoxNews, even the critics can't get enough, no wonder their ratings are so high.
AbelNOON 2 years ago 6
@AbelNOON Actually, their ratings are dropping. MSNBC's ratings are increasing. And yet, we just had this election that would seem to shopw the contrary.
The stock market dropped 28% under Bush, not reaching the level when he took office until Sept. 15th of this year. Call it a lost economic decade. Those are the FACTS! And yet, Obama & the Democrats get the blame. iS THIS A STUPID COUNTRY OR WHAT?
gumpydoood 1 year ago
What on earth does "We've corrected that now" mean? The statement is simply not true. Seems like the deed was already done, unless they have a time machine. It's like statements like that can erase or revise history and memory in some parallel reality. They make statements like this all the time on that channel.
maximilian333 2 years ago
Who cares?
U2ForNow 2 years ago
Do the graphics/video people at Fox News ever get anything right?
crixxxxxxxxx 2 years ago 2
Yes
ariiiiigold 2 years ago
No they don't. They even made a few glaring mistakes on the 911 footage as well.
maddog77seven 2 years ago
why was Rosie Odonell speaking? did she want to lick Palin or something???
hailung23 2 years ago 2
The AP assigned so many fact checkers because this witch lies all the time. If this is the Republican future I'm switching to Indie.
snic1978 2 years ago
It says "Going Rouge, Sarah Palin, An American Nightmare." Rouge means red.
TheWiseCommenter 2 years ago
so what
vince6363 2 years ago
it said "going rouge" instead of "going rogue"
utube5432151 2 years ago
so what
vince6363 2 years ago
They sure do make a lot of mistakes
Utopor 2 years ago
Wait.....I don't get it
treemonster123 2 years ago 2
me too?! its the same cover?? i dont see something wrong?
Blackenise89 2 years ago
Rouge is make-up you put on your cheeks. Rogue, if not a noun, is used as a verb to describe someone going their own way, usually against the mainstream.
"Going Rouge" is an unflattering satire of Palin. "Going Rogue" is Palin's failed attempt to appear sophisticated and literate.
Soubriquet 2 years ago 2
This is a blatant conspiracy by the lib media to minimalize Ms.Palins political currency by deceivingly attaching sexism to her by this obviously planned "accident"!
Huh? Oh, Fox isn't a lib outlet? Sorry, accidents do happen, no harm done.
440kendall 2 years ago
Rouge de l'Ouest - a breed of sheep. That's most fitting, but it could be about her cheeks.
abcshrill 2 years ago 2
Read it and weap:
NBC Nightly News w/Brian Williams 9.65 Million
ABC World News w/Charles Gibson 8.48 Million
CBS Evening News w/Katie Couric 7.04 Million
Yes, Liberal News Stations still dominate the News by a long shot. Cable News shows dont even come close to the real News shows.
dfwtexxaas 2 years ago
Why would we weep?
jesusfreake888 2 years ago
So basically: our news has more views so that means our political views are superior. Hmm...
jesusfreake888 2 years ago
fake!
entehrend 2 years ago
graphics error? haha what a lame ass excuse .. bet 85% of people who watched that show didn't even realise what was written on that cover
lykopis 2 years ago
wait.... people who watch Fox can read? I think you need to check your facts on that one
johns375 2 years ago
How come 99% of the comments about fox news are about how it's an 'epic fail' or how it's 'bullshit' - yet its the most watched news station in america? Are you all fucking hypocrites? If it's so shit, stop watching it!
wolfman8325 2 years ago
more retards watching
leetbarker 2 years ago
why so serious?
HotLeper 2 years ago
@wolfman8325
It's not even close to being the most watched station. ABC, NBC, and CBS News stations average 7 Millions viewers every single night. Even Katie Couric gets 3 Million MORE viewers than O'Reilly. Cable News doesn't even come close the regular station News.
dfwtexxaas 2 years ago
Looks like dfwtexxaas needs a factchecker too!
According to Nielsen Media Research:
FOX News Ranks 1 in prime time with 3.4 million viewers. TBS is two, USA is three, ESPN is four, CNN is fifth, MSNBC placed ninth. During the daytime, FOX comes in second to Nickelodeon, CNN places ninth and MSNBC places fifteenth. Don't believe me? Look it up. Sorry, but you told a lie. And O'reilly Is the most watched but you could work for him or Couric! LOL
Glen Beck has the most viewers
rickrocker 2 years ago
@rickrocker Hey numbers guy, I got a hoot for ya. Dancing with the Stars has been number one in it's time slot so does that mean it is the best most worthwhile show to watch? Hell no. It means that this show is popular and thought to be very entertaining. Does that sound familiar?
kdixon7783B 2 years ago
Can you cite that please?
rickrocker 2 years ago
Oh, I see what you're trying to say. You think I said something was more worth while to watch. What did I say that was more worth while to watch? I just told dfwtexxaas that his figures were wrong. You seem to think I said something else.
rickrocker 2 years ago
@rickrocker I am just saying that numbers mean shit.
kdixon7783B 2 years ago
Numbers show that driving while consuming alcohol promotes a greater risk of injury or death to the driver and/or others. Numbers also show that drivers are more likely to get pulled over at 2 am for DUI which is why you see less drunks on the road today vs 1980. Numbers show medical professionals that chemo can can send cancer into remission and that cannaboids actually prevent lung cancer. Numbers are what make cases which is what ALL news media use but not always properly interpreted.
rickrocker 2 years ago
@rickrocker And as all professionals who use numbers know they can be padded faked and bullshitted and using numbers to argue your point on Youtube is like jerking off, although it feels good, it's ultimately meaningless and you haven't shared a thing with anyone.
kdixon7783B 2 years ago
I respect your idea that numbers don't always reveal the whole picture, but at the same time you can't prove things based on feelings, you've got to have facts to back up your claims + logical thinking to understand what the numbers mean and what they don't mean.
maximilian333 2 years ago
I'm not arguing an opinion. I'm presenting facts. You may formulate your own opinions around them as I have and you may even ask me for mine if you wish but the facts remain facts. One last thing for you to think about is why would you tell me that if I was to argue my opinion on youtube is meaningless when you are so quick to share yours?
rickrocker 2 years ago
@rickrocker I said using numbers to argue a point/opinion on Youtube is meaningless mostly because the info can't always be backed up or debated. I didn't say anyones opinion is meaningless.
kdixon7783B 2 years ago
Then what would YOU use to make your opinions, points, comments, or statements strong? I have numbers. If you don't beleive my numbers, I invite you to research them and show me I am incorrect. I based my numbers on a research organization, you may look them up if you wish.
rickrocker 2 years ago
@rickrocker Just keep playing with you're numbers.
kdixon7783B 2 years ago
Hey, I'm not the one that created them, I just brought them to you.
rickrocker 2 years ago
You don't get network vs. cable?
snic1978 2 years ago
Look it up. Facts are facts.
rickrocker 2 years ago
lol both palin and fox news need factcheckers. that'll open up a whole new job market!
Marine4Life51 2 years ago
this was the fact check thats the best they could do dont you think if they actually lied like GE i mean NBC does, the left censored youtubers would be the first to show it
theygunaHATEME 2 years ago
What politician doesn't need a fact checker?
What statements of FOX news have been false and never retracted? NBC is known for retractions and unreliable sources. CNN is race obsessed and the NY Times flat out lies.
So I wonder, where does Marine4Life51 get his/her news updates from?
rickrocker 2 years ago
Washington Post, NYTimes, Wall Street Journal. As for your 2nd statement about fox news. You're on the internet bro, it's all over the place, all you have to do is look.
Marine4Life51 2 years ago
Really, 'bro'? So you take your news from anywhere on the Internet? How well informed you must be.
As for your Washington Post, NYTimes, and Wall Street Journal. Besides having a liberal bias, what makes those three different than FOX? Besides that the NYTimes prints its 'facts' without checking them?
Don't try telling me the Wall Street Journal isn't liberal, I read it too. While the editorials are moderately conservative, the news pages are worse than the NYTimes.
rickrocker 2 years ago
by anywhere on the internet...well you're already on youtube. You want to find fox news lies, it's really not that hard. There's really no way to spin video evidence if you don't cut stuff out. As for your other commments...alright, you give me more reliable news sources and i'll check them out.
Marine4Life51 2 years ago
Again, show me them lying. They are all as reliable as the next, they get their information from the same places. It's all how they present it. Furthermore, check the article "Media Bias is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist".
Reporters stirring up rallies? Yes, CNN when they said they didn't see one black person in a crowd, implying racism. What reporter stirred up a rally besides Rick Santelli at CNBC?
rickrocker 2 years ago
and the wall street journal is conservative, even if you don't think it is. As for what separates fox news from those...i could give tons of examples but have you ever heard of reporters from any of those newspapers stirring up protesters at a rally?
Marine4Life51 2 years ago
i still cant believe thats the best you pathetic progressives can do HAHA, 1 star for propaganda
theygunaHATEME 2 years ago
hahahahaha fox news = some kinda failure
Doctors2Advocate 2 years ago
they just need to come out and say that they are a democratic news station already
towneshasnolife 2 years ago
If you think Palin is an idiot, look at the mess these briliant politicians have us in. Oh wait, you're still blaming Bush. Anyway, these elitist career politicians have dug us in such a hole 'cause they're so far out of touch with the real world it's a joke. At this point I'd rather have a down to earth white conservative woman than a snobish black or white, man or woman, liberal or conservative. Brains makes not a wise leader. Wisdom (common sense) makes a leader. Besides, she aint dumb.
ThePadintor 2 years ago
since when has palin been "down to earth" and "in touch" with the American population at large? and by "common sense" and "wisdom" do you mean not being able to give a straight answer when Katie Couric asks here what periodicals, newspapers, and magazines she likes to read?
Marine4Life51 2 years ago
U don't get what I mean. My point is that while some think she's a joke ...
... what? And the politicians that lead us now are not? I'm not saying Palin is "the one," I'm just saying we should stop thinking these smooth talkers have our best interest at heart. Our representatives are set for the rest of their lives. The rest of us, we'll be swimming in the mess they've created for a long time. And yeah, down to earth. She hasn't been tainted by Washington, at least, not yet.
ThePadintor 2 years ago
padintor...not sure what ur trying to get at.
Politics is messed up and of course we definitely have a lot of incompetents and ignoramuses in government. I've watched most of her interviews and the vice presidential debates. She clearly is a joke. Just because she shares your principles and acts all folksy and shit, doesn't make her a competent leader.
Marine4Life51 2 years ago
Hey, don't get me wrong. I still love this nation. But when we start killing our finest men and women like in Ft Hood, something's wrong. Yes, we not that Muslim. We killed then because our leaders are afraid to call a spade a spade. We killed them because of political correctness. Sounds like a whole new subject, but it's not. We need real leaders again. We as a nation also need to get our backbone back.
ThePadintor 2 years ago
just curious not trying to be offensive.
what spade hasn't been called a spade? and i'm just confused as to what political correctness has to do with fort hood. what do u think should have been done?
Marine4Life51 2 years ago
We haven't had a real leader since the days of JFK. The mass media keeps the population distracted with worthless shit like Palin while the country goes further and further down the shitter thanks to the Federal Reserve and it's allies.
kiailol 2 years ago 2
I can't wait till Ron Paul's HR 1207 goes through. The Fed is going to have to answer some questions and people will go to jail. Gold price is going to hit the roof. LOL
rickrocker 2 years ago
I can admit JFK was a real leader, but so was Reagan. Can you admit that? Or is this a dem / repub thing?
ThePadintor 2 years ago
I'm not a Democrat or Republican, but I don't see Reagan as a true president because of some of his policies. He started the war on drugs, which has gotten over 100 innocent civillians killed, he allowed the arms companies to supply both sides in the Iran Iraq War, He increased military spending needlessly and he practed trickle down economics. While it's true he made Americans feel good about their country again, I think it was at a very high cost. Check out this clip watch?v=QTcL6Xc_eMM
kiailol 2 years ago
It's the CEO of Merril Lynch ordering Reagan to 'speed up' his speech so tax cuts for the wealthy can be passed. NOONE should talk to a US president like that, let alone some corporate rat. It makes me angry to hear him boss Reagan around like that, just like it made me angry to see Obama bow before the fat pig they call the King of Saudi Arabia.
kiailol 2 years ago
and when Bush hug and kissed that Saudi king, you felt what then? I can understand showing respect, but kissing????
hailung23 2 years ago
Abdullah is a filthy cunt of a man, I would break every bone in his worthless frame if I was put in a room alone with him.
kiailol 2 years ago
damn guys kind of old now. What are so disgruntled island shia? or do you think he is part of a vast shadow govt hell bent on world domination???? ZOG lives right?
hailung23 2 years ago
There are plenty of reasons to hate Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. He rules his country like a feudal lord of the middle ages, promotes extremist Wahhabism around the world through kingdom- funded madrassas, oppresses women and disenters brutally and last but not least the shitbag has the audacity to suggest that Saudi Arabia should receive 'reparations' after it's oil is gone. In all honesty the man deserves to be broken on a wheel.
kiailol 2 years ago 3
Well put.
maximilian333 2 years ago
I don't care what sort of postulations or gesticulations presidents make toward other world leaders. It's all manipulative showmanship. What I really care about is policy and action. Numbers don't lie. Saudi Arabia plays the role of, in an economic and moral sense, our abusive pimp. We need to get away from Saudi even if it means courting moderate Iran (Yes those are the many people protesting in Iran right now).
maximilian333 2 years ago 4
"moderate Iran" the people who sponsor the most terrorist on the planet? Yes the citizens of Iran are quite moderate, but they dont control anything. I totally agree with your words about Saudi, but courting Iran isnt the solution at all. Not to mention there are no refinerys in Iran, so that means we would have to import it, and refine here on our shores. And no one in the US wants a refinery in their backyard. Sorry but courting Iran isnt a solution, its just more headaches.
hailung23 2 years ago
I think you are playing a rhetorical shell game by suggesting (if facetiously) that I would for even a moment consider Ahmedinejad's clowns "moderate". And this goes well beyond oil. If we truly believe in fighting for freedom and democracy in addition to our own interests, then we should be planning to confront Iran both diplomatically and militarily.
But the strategic danger they present in light of their ties to Russia is very real.
maximilian333 2 years ago
hmm you said moderate Iran, not me. so perhaps you're palying a game with yourself. And if we believe in Freedom we wouldnt be in Iran we would be in Darfur, or Burma. But if we're interested in economics, then we should engage Iran. Sorry but your post lack depth
hailung23 2 years ago
Uh-huh, you did indeed parse (with a lack of understanding) over use of the phrase 'moderate Iran', if we're talking about stability in the mideast then Burma etc. has nothing to do with this discussion. Sunni Saudi is ten times more wacko than Shiite Iran. I consider Iran a "lesser evil" with a large, active moderate faction that has obviously been able to put its government on the defensive. Sorry but you seem to be more interested in playing clever games than staying focused on the issues.
maximilian333 2 years ago
You are severe fooling yopurself about Iran. You may have people in the Saudi govt who give money to terrorist, while the STATE OF IRAN sponsors Terrorism. Not so sure whats moderate about that. And since you like the word stability, IRAN is the one build a nuclear weapon not Saudi. But this will touch off a Arab or Mideast arms race,with Saudi and Eygpt wanting the bomb next. And i dont think Isreal will be too happy about that. So once again your points make zero sense.
hailung23 2 years ago