Russians and the rest of the world should love Americans we brought you so many things you love if you hate you should not use them like Television the automobile, the telephone, Movies, the microwave, sound by radio, sticky tape, pop up toaster and on and on
Russian are cocky. They think they are better than us instead their weapons and war machines end up destroyed easily. Soviet Junkies. US and it's allies weapons and war machines destroyed tons of Russian built weapons and war machines from Korean War to 2003 war in Iraq.
US APC and IFV are better than Russian APC and IFV. US M2 Bradley, LAV-25, destroyed the Iraqi Russian built BMP-1, BMP-2, BTR-50, BTR-60, MT-LB, BMD-1, and BMD-2 in 1991 Gulf War.
00:9, the AAV project was cancelled after it was discovered anti-surface missiles could go past the horizon (which is how these were going to be used).
the bradley does NOT make our nation great. it is a footnote in history - a failed experiment run amok, overbloated over developed crap that came out 20 years behind schedule.
Only bombing eh? Sounds like you, if ya are a Russky, got the typical Red political education.
Ya ever hear of Normandy? That was a soldiers fight. Ya ever hear of the Ardiens, aka Battle of the Bulge and a little place called Bastogne? Remagen? Iwo? Tarawa, Guadalcanal, Battle of Monte Cassino?
Then there's Midway, Leyte Gulf, Coral Sea,
and convoys making the Murmansk run, through the Ü Boat gauntlet to those ungrateful Commies.
Lol Russia got there asses kicked in WW2 if it wasnt for America in WW1 and WW2 Europe would probably be a very different country right now. So dont complain that the US doesnt do anything and were weak cuz we've kicked ass in both World Wars.
all russian weapon (Ak-47, btr, bmp) that were made on the experiance of WW2 - now coping by USA and others - because that prooves that USSR have most biggest experiance in WW2 and fight - and prooves that america never fight in WW2 - only bombing! thats why america have best airplanes! US never fight on the ground - coz they COWARDS!
Oh please! Your BTR and BMP totally sucks. US troops did fight on the ground during WW2 dumbass. WITHOUT US helps you would have speaking Nazi German language dumbass. USSR experience in WW2. Yeah Right! The last time I check the Russian are the one the lose the most causalities in WW2. So much for experience dumbass.
hey asshole, we used to say here more short - without RUSSIA all world would speak nazi german language!!!
by the way do you know why USA gone in Europe?? coz you were afraid that RUSSIANs will first step in Europe and take controll!!))) noone expected that we would kick ass to invincible facists so fast!!!))
learn the history asshole! and drive your shit vechickle for fun - Hummer!!!! )))) you stealed our armor coz understand what Russians understand many years ago after WW2 fight!
@SuperGoodman44 I'd read your post if it was in English, by the way it wasn't the Russians who won WW2, it wasn't England, or France, OR AMERICA. It was a team effort, we ALL beat back Germany. I wish you'd understand we all fought back against them, not like now were you're all (internet wise) fighting each other.
@SuperGoodman44 We entered the Second World War because Japan attacked us. We fought not only Nazi Germany, but Italy and Japan, while Russia lost over 30 million casualties just trying to fight the Germans.
You have NO IDEA of what you're talking about, ASSHOLE.
@USAAIRPOWER Typical american bullshit. YOU join the war when its practically over and then say OH WE"RE SO GREAT WE SAVED ALL OF YOU FROM NAZIS-bullshit. The battle of stalingrad alone had more casualties then all wars america have been in combined. So keep watching your bullshit doscovery channel and stay dumb Fucking pendossian teenager..))
@russianinja2008 Russians did the same thing against the Japanese. The US had just about crushed Japan and the Soviets came and grabbed as much free land as they could. Also, had the Americans not helped on D-Day west Europe would have been under stalins bootheel after the Russians beat the Germans.
AK-47 sucks not even accurate! BMP, BTR, and BMD? Oh Please! I see tons of them get destroyed during Six Days Wars, Yom Kippur War, Iraq Iran War, Soviet Afghan War, 1991 Gulf War, and War in Iraq 2003.
Your fucking loser. Russia are cowards to invade US.
Ну что за русская дикая натура заходить на американский сайт и гадить, гадить здесь. Американци к вам на rutube не ходят. Ещё скажите что youtube русские изобрели и американци скопировали...
why the fuck is it whenever someone posts US military there are a million douche-bags that hop on here and start typing in Russian thinking everything is made cheaper and better in Russia, who gives a shit. go live your life and stop being such a damn troll and thank god Russia isn't the USSR anymore. oh and stop acting like engineers if you where you wouldn't be here talking about some guy's random videos.
why the fuck don't they give that to the boys in afghanistan and IRAQ instead of those fucked up jeeps that are like (fire on me, I'm weak and soft) the boys even need to put wood on their jeeps to try to slow the bullets down, avoiding barely too important injuries .
наабарот русские капируют технику с сша пример амеикосы сделали f 22 raptor притон с вертикальным и горезонтальным а рускии скапировали с раптора невидемый корпус от радаров и дезайн очен пахош русские даже хамер скопировали так что непездите и смотрите оружие будощего и топ 10 военой техники и будете знать что америкосы сельнее я за us army
русским даже в компьютерных игр амуницую лучше ресуют чтобы покозать что они не бомжи к примеру bad compani 2 вот так
Ты наверное морда чухонская про Петра Уфинцева не слышал? Не знаешь что вся технология "стелс" разработана в СССР еще в 1950е годы? И что мы специально ее дали американцам заманив их в ловушку? )))
Товарищи пендосы, ваше "APC" под стол пешком ходило когда советская техника по болотам в говне плавала и выплывала... Бегайте и дальше с биотуалетом в рюкзаке, да не претендуйте на статус лучшей бронетехники...
@Kamowlol а американский глиссирующий БТР EFV тоже русские придумали в прошлом столетии наверное... Сами же по телевизору говорите что военная техника 90% устарела... Один авианосец стоит ржавеет
Конечно - это же БМП-1 (1966) на стероидах с немецким дизелем (Американцы двигатели делать разучились)
К тому же это еще большая хуета чем Бредли и так же не будет ни глиссирующим ни десантируемым в итоге.
Авианосцы уже никому не нужны в эру Клуб-К, П-800 и т д да и наш авианосец не авианосец а авианесущий крейсер с тяжелыми СВЕРХЗВУКОВЫМИ ракетами П-700
В серьезной современной войне авианосец не проживет и часа
Смотрел по ТВ канал Дискавери там короче типа супер современное оружие Америки они там придумали типа Страйкер какой то бля копия нашего БТР 80 только у страйкера колеса поменьше))) И прикол в том что наш БТР 80 уже десятки лет гоняет и считается обычным бронетранспортером а у них там ебать копать это супер мега современное оружие теперь)))) вот протоколисты... вечно ржу с этой передачи...
haha russian are very ignorant and they always say that they are the best equip w/c was really stupid and you know why?because they got collapsed after that always stupid and full of illusion and ready to collapsed again!haha no hurt feelings!!!!
oh and last time i checked my eyes it was 100% good, so i suggest u to check ur eyes if u dont see americunt apc looks same like russian BTR, in fact, russian BTR was made years earlier..
@4CaHeK. LOL. I said go get your eyes checked meaning go visit the eye doctor. Then look at the pictures again. Ruskie BTR & BMP series are much wider and have a lower silhouette compared to most other US/Western APCs or IFVs. And before commenting, get your eyes checked for real this time and don't be a lying cunt.
well it looks like u need to check your brain too, because i wrote last time i visited eye doctor, my eyes was 100% good. LOL making parody of BTR and making adding changes in it, doesnt change the fact
@4CaHeK. LOL. In your previous comment, you said you checked your eyes yourself not the eye doctor. Even if you did have good eye sight, your facts are from your ass. Only BTR-90 & LAV 25 (which is in the video) look somewhat similar, but LAV 25's appearance design was based on the Swiss MOWAG Piranha.
when i wrote that, i ment i went to doctor, was it so hard for you to understand? LOL Swiss MOWAG Piranha is parody of BTR, so lav is a parody of parody? LOL!
@4CaHeK. Piranha was first produced in 1976. LAV-25 was first produced in 1983. Another APC, the Stryker was first used in 2002. The only BTR vehicle that looks similar to the Piranha,LAV-25,or Stryker is the BTR-90. (That is if your eye sight is good you would notice) BTR-90 was first produced in 2004. With these facts, it's more reasonable to say BTR-90 is a parody of Stryker, LAV-25, & Piranha. Not only do you display lack of proof of good eye sight, but lack of knowledge of these vehicles.
Lol ur so funny, BTR-90 is modernised version of previous BTR versions, so it doesnt change the fact lav & stryker is parody of previous BTR versions.
@4CaHeK. The previous BTR versions have a very low silhouette & look like rusty metal boxes since they are very old. Because your eye sight is not good, but poor, then I guess it's okay whatever you say based on what you see. However, if you ever want to state a fact, please make sure the source you got it from isn't from your ass. It was funny the first time you said that US APCs are a parody to BTRs, but eventually it gets boring as a repetitive joke.
haha i dont really care what you think, the fact is the fact lav & stryker is parody of BTR, well it seems like u REALLY need to change ur brain cause i said many times my eyesight is 100% good, looks like your brain cant understand that =)
My brain understands what's true & what's a lie. When I read comments with obvious lies & facts said to be true when really it was grabbed from someone's ass, I laugh. Surely you're at least smart enough to realize that an average person with a working brain wouldn't believe a person has good eyesight when saying LAV & Stryker are a parody of BTR when they clearly look different. BTW, if you're going to tell jokes, please tell new ones. An amateur comedian even knows that.
@4CaHeK. HAHA. And are you just going to say that without providing a source of proof? Funny how the information I read about LAV-25 & Stryker says the designs of both were derived from the Swiss MOWAG Piranha in which the Swiss made the design themselves. Source: Any article that talks about Stryker or LAV-25 or Swiss MOWAG Piranha. RESEARCH IT FOR YOURSELF, if you don't believe me. BTW, we would be really stupid if we wanted to copy the designs of BTR or BMP.
@4CaHeK. LOL. Unable to summon your courage to research about Stryker, LAV-25 or Swiss MOWAG Piranha? Afraid to realize the fact that these vehicles' designs aren't copied from BTR? I don't understand how anyone could be afraid of performing harmless research. Anyways, I'll only reply when you provide REAL FACTS that support your statement. Otherwise, I'm just wasting my time arguing with a bizarre idiot that doesn't know what he's talking about. Happy Researching! (That's if you're doing it) :)
@4CaHeK. You have still yet to research about the facts of American APCs & IFVs. So what if BTR was created first? Do you ever read your comments? Based on the theme of what you say, I can say all Russian nuclear submarine designs are copied from USS Nautilus because it's the first nuclear submarine? So all Russian nuclear submarines are parody of American nuclear Submarines.
@4CaHeK. At 0:56, it's a LAV-25 in which the design was derived from the Swiss MOWAG Piranha in which the Swiss made the design completely by themselves. The only BTR version that has similar appearance compared to LAV-25 is the BTR-90, only when viewed from the side. Compare the appearance of both vehicles from all angles of view and you'll know. You are afraid to research information, certainly you aren't afraid to research pictures? If so LOL & I'm wasting my time with a dumb clown.
hahaha lol how do u know they made design by they own? u heard they said that and belive it? lol its stupid to belive in everything you hear, in reality, BTR design was made after design from Russian experimental water-ground APC that had no wheels, (mini-version of ZUBR), and later other countrys stole design as very comfortable for apc...
@4CaHeK. That's your excuse for not researching? LOL. There's a reason why research is performed. Since there are only a few dozen people involved in an APC design process, everyone else must rely on what these designers say to know about their designs. We design our own APCs & other military equipment to suit our own military needs & rival powers like USA & Russia always try to avoid making similar designs. When we copy designs, we would say so. In this case we had said we used Swiss designs.
Why research if i know already that americunts copied this design? Fact say this.. I understand ur typical low-iq american, but you need not much brain to realise BTR was made before americunt versions of this vehicle.
HAHA. Why research you ask? To either learn or make sure what you think you know is correct. Since you are either afraid of researching or you find it hard to swallow the facts, find a way to fix this uncommon problem you have. Other than that, I don't care about your future comments. If we did copy or steal BTR design, surely BTR designers or Russian military would have said this already, but they didn't. The only APCs that have similar BTR designs that we use are for target practice only. :)
Im not afraid to research i just dont need it i know my facts is 100% right. Well how do u know Russian military didnt said americunts copy their design? In fact, they say that some times, watch "Voennoe delo" or "Udarnaja sila" there are tons of comaprisons of Russian military vs. western...
LOL. You're a typical lying cunt. Of course you're afraid of researching because you make pathetic excuses to not research. Your facts are 100% wrong because you don't provide adequate proof in your comments. Appearance doesn't prove anything. And to answer your question, I know because Russian Military has never mentioned the issue on Russian State Media. USA makes almost all of their own designs of military equipment and only borrows a few from their allies & modifies it with permission.
It seems you can't read as well. I never said Stryker or LAV-25 was made before BTR. I know BTR was made first before all these vehicles. That doesn't mean we would copy BTR design you simple-minded idiot. Stryker & LAV-25 was based on the Piranha design made completely by the Swiss. As I said before, find your courage to research and don't be a pathetic cowardly cunt by making excuses to not research. It may be hard for you to swallow facts, but a glass of water might help. :)
LOL. You're continuing to prove to me that you can't read. I said your "fact" of having the Stryker & LAV-25 design to be copied from the BTR is WRONG. BTW, USA attracts 100,000s of international students every year. 600,000+ in 2008. USA is one of the leading countries in innovation. How can USA be dumbest nation? LOL. The term "dumb" was used to describe the US population in the future as a harsh warning if not enough American children get adequate education to keep up with rising population.
hahaha "dumb" is word that describes americunt nation now, so easily to brainwash dumbest nation :D. Why dumb? Very simple. Sure makers of coffins shown in video wont say they copied design from BTR, they say they made it by themselves and dumbs like you belive it. americunts belive what they hear and dont think is it true or false, also they dont think about propoganda showing on tv, typical dumb sheep flock.
The word "dumb" means lacking of intelligence or lacking adequate judgment which perfectly describes you. How? You lack knowledge about USA yet judge our country & people without your brain. LOL. You're the dumb one yourself. And I've repeated many times, Stryker & LAV-25 uses Piranha design which the SWISS made by themselves, we only modified it. If our APCs are "coffins" & you say we copy BTR design, that means BTR is coffin as well? LOL. Read your comments over before posting dumb idiot.
ahahha you belive everything you hear, typical brainwashed americunt, you can not accept the truth, but it doesnt mean its not truth, your just angry because u know im right
LOL. If I knew you were right, then I wouldn't have said you were wrong. You said Stryker & LAV-25 copied BTR design yet you provide no proof. When I have provided proof that the 2 USA APCs uses Swiss Piranha design, you say it's USA propaganda or that I'm brainwashed. HAHA. You're afraid to research about it, so instead you just continue on with your made-up facts. If I were brainwashed, then I would be like you & not research. This is why you're a typical cowardly dumb cunt. Understood? :)
haha research what? propoganda? Im not like you beliving everything you hear, in this case americunts made design of their coffins AFTER birth of BTR, sure they say they "made design by themselves" but why then design of these coffins look like BTR's.. Same as in us school brainwash american children that americunts won WW2 xDDD brainwashed nation, because dumb.)
LOL. This is why you're pathetic. Who is telling you to research propaganda? Research Russian facts about BTR & provide me link where Russian military says USA copied BTR design. Fact is this, Stryker & LAV-25 uses Swiss Piranha design. USA had to buy licenses from the Swiss & given Swiss permission to modify design. And it seems you have no knowledge of anything. Of course USA won WW2 along with UK,USSR, & other ally countries. This is why you're the dumb idiot. Need I say more? :)
HAHA and u call me dumb :D I already told u many times i dont need to research if youve had brain u would compare BTR and americunt analog and u would realise they design look SAME, in fact, BTR was made BEFORE americunt coffin.. Im sorry for you, ur dork that compares facts by what is write in internet without using your brain, in FACT, u dont have it xD
LOL. It seems your brain is not working. I've said before, the only BTR type that looks similar to LAV-25 is BTR-90, yet both APCs only look the same from the SIDE view. Compare both APCs in 3D view & you will see clear differences in exterior design. Yet exterior appearance doesn't prove anything, interior design matters most. Saying you don't need to research is your same old pathetic excuse to not research which proves to me you're a pathetic cowardly idiot. :) I guess you really hate facts.
LOL. Omg how stupid can human be, did you even understood what i write? I guess your brain is too small to understand information that i write, americunts made their coffins after BTR, i dont hate facts i know very much facts and i know americunts copied BTR, you belive in everything write in internet, typical brainwashed americunt :)
HAHA. You did not understand my reply so I suggest you read it again. Your proof of Stryker & LAV-25 to be using BTR design is that appearance is similar from side view & BTR was made first. LOL. This doesn't prove anything. Because your brain is not working & because you're afraid of facts, I'm not surprised by your comments. The reason why I say Stryker & LAV-25 are modified Swedish Piranhas is because USA had to buy manufacturing licenses from Sweden to be allowed to modify Swedish Piranha.
Haha you say to me that i write to you, and u think your brain works? LOL! I understand your typical brainwashed americunt, u can not understand that i write to you about your "facts", i just feel sorry for you..
LOL. You wish we copied BTR design because that would mean BTRs are good. But don't worry Russia's BTR designs are safe. We don't copy things as simple as a steal box on wheels. There are many European & American APC designs that are better than BTR, but Swiss Piranha is best due to its low cost for an advanced & highly capable & versatile APC. Because you don't research, I don't know where you get your facts and because you're afraid to research, you should feel more sorry for yourself. :)
as i already said, im not afraid of facts, i know what is facts, and what is "facts", what your telling me to search now, is "facts" and only brainwased like u can belive in them ;)
Haha. I'm not telling you to research a specific way or for a specific thing. I'm telling you to research your way & tell me where you get the "fact" that Stryker & LAV-25 copied BTR design. This is proof that your brain isn't functioning. :) Since you always make pathetic excuses to not research, anyone would consider this as a symptom of fear of researching. General Dynamics (company that builds Stryker & LAV-25) had to purchase licenses from Sweden in order to copy & modify Piranha design.
Haha. Answered what? I haven't asked you any questions. LOL. All I have said to you are facts that prove Stryker & LAV-25 are modified Swiss Piranhas. I repeat what I say because it seems you are the one who can't understand. Anyways, I believe I have given enough facts unlike you who had only provided 1 fact which is that BTR was made first & believing it is adequate proof that American APCs copied BTR design. LOL. This is one of many reasons why I say your brain isn't functioning. Understand?
If you didnt know, answer can be without a question, its not my problem your brain cannot understand what im telling to you and saying to me same things that i say to you. Typical for brainwashed americunt ;)
LOL. Your comment, "I already answered you everything" makes the word "answer" mean a reply or a response to a question. You should know how to use words of a language properly if you plan to use it. Anyways, I need not to explain to you anymore that Stryker & LAV-25 uses Swiss Piranha design since information is everywhere. The only thing stopping you is your fear of researching. BTW, brainwashed people would stick with what they believe & not research to find out the truth. Someone like you.:)
Actually , i answered to your "facts", and explained everything, it looks like u cannot understand even i explained everything to you ;) u keep crying about "searching facts" without realising i already explained u about it
Haha. Telling me that BTR was made first & that LAV-25 looks the same as BTR (yet both APCs only look similar from the SIDE view) is NOT ADEQUATE proof to support your claim that American APCs "copied" BTR design. This is another reason why I think your brain isn't working. I have provided many explanations & one in particular which is perfect proof. American company General Dynamics had to PURCHASE manufacturing LICENSES from Swiss company MOWAG to be ALLOWED to copy & modify Piranha design.
"American company General Dynamics had to PURCHASE manufacturing LICENSES from Swiss company MOWAG to be ALLOWED to copy & modify Piranha design." Lol yes, and swiss copied BTR, very simple.
LOL. Swiss did not copy BTR. BTR & Piranha are two completely different APC designs. Swiss would say so if they copied BTR, but they didn't. Piranha APC is 100% Swiss design.
LOL. Now you're saying Swiss stole BTR design instead of copied. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. No country would steal a simple APC design. Swiss would say if they "COPIED" BTR design. Just like General Dynamics said their two APC products (Stryker & LAV-25) are copied & modified Swiss Piranhas. Doesn't your brain's logic make you laugh? :)
Well using others idea is same as stole that idea, americunts always copy and stole ideas from other countrys. LOL. And you prove my words yourself, again your saying to me that i say to you. But dont worry, its normal to use others' idea for americunts, because they have very small brain to make their own idea ;)
LOL. Using someone's design WITH PERMISSION is not stealing. How can any country succeed if its people steal & copy designs,technology, etc. from other people from other countries? Many people have same ideas, only a few have the brains to turn ideas into reality. USA is one of the leading countries in innovation because there are enough Americans who spend a lot of time & money into research & development. My brain is working, your brain is not. So it doesn't matter how "big" your brain is. :)
With permission? Dont be rediculous, americunts mostly steal good ideas from others and make them as their own, only brainwashed people like you close their eyes and dont want to see it, well it looks like u realy have problems with brains, its amazing u are great example of americunt, steal my words and use them against me, and saying "my brain is not working" LOL you proved im 100% right ;) americunts canot make something by their own they always steal ideas, now i see im really right.
Love the M-113. A true classic.
sunac 2 months ago
every one who dosent like this vidio must not be american lol
TheKj2131 2 months ago
I think that your action shots work best with your choice of music.
coolininbk 2 months ago
Nice video . I love the fact that you use Danish M113 A1 apc's in it twice as well . first one is at 1:24 and the second one a bit later .
But couldnt you have used the upgraded version of it ? Its a lot nicer.
Mmmkage 2 months ago
I challenge the crews of these vehicles to face a BMP-3 or a BTR-90.
1169Timothy 2 months ago
@1169Timothy btr-90 would get distroyed my the americans lol btr-90 is bad ass but not good enough for lav-25 or striker
TheKj2131 2 months ago
@TheKj2131 Say that again when the BTR comes around the hill with reactive Armour allover it.
1169Timothy 2 months ago
American Trash...
zerocker45 2 months ago
Don't judge tanks by a Youtube song!!!!!!!!!!
tryson1995 2 months ago
Russians and the rest of the world should love Americans we brought you so many things you love if you hate you should not use them like Television the automobile, the telephone, Movies, the microwave, sound by radio, sticky tape, pop up toaster and on and on
brianbirc 3 months ago
hahahah us always make shit "D
SorrybutJebiga 4 months ago
You could add the vehicle names too..
vanquish082 6 months ago
We could kick the Russian military butts in the Ground, Sky, Water, Space, and Cyber Space. The Russian can't even beat us in the cold war.
SilentEagles 7 months ago in playlist Military Vehicles
@SilentEagles lol sucker 0
02Sibalex 4 months ago
US War Machines:
-MBT:(M1A2 SEP TUSK, M1A2 SEP v 1/2, & M1A1/A2 TUSK I/II)
-APC:(10 variants of Stryker, M1117, & LAV-25 variants)
-IFV/AAV/RECCON:(M2A3 BUSK, M3A3 BUSK, & AAV-7A1)
-MRAP:(M-ATV, Cougar H, Buffalo, Caiman 4x4 / 6x6, RG-33L / 4x4, & MaxxPro / MassPro Dash)
-MLRS:(M270A1 & M142)
-SPA/SPMS/SPAAG:(M109A6 PIM, Dragon Fire II, & M6 Linebacker)
-SAM:(MEADS,Upgraded PAC-3 Patriot, THAAD, HUMRAAM, & AN/TWQ-1 Avenger)
-HOWITZER:(M777A2)
SilentEagles 7 months ago in playlist Military Vehicles
Russian are cocky. They think they are better than us instead their weapons and war machines end up destroyed easily. Soviet Junkies. US and it's allies weapons and war machines destroyed tons of Russian built weapons and war machines from Korean War to 2003 war in Iraq.
SilentEagles 7 months ago in playlist Military Vehicles
US APC and IFV are better than Russian APC and IFV. US M2 Bradley, LAV-25, destroyed the Iraqi Russian built BMP-1, BMP-2, BTR-50, BTR-60, MT-LB, BMD-1, and BMD-2 in 1991 Gulf War.
SilentEagles 7 months ago
M113 forever...!
spiny79 7 months ago
stryker = POS
Novacore88 7 months ago
99 french people dont like the fact they never get to use THEIR expensive vehicles.
tantorecords 7 months ago
00:9, the AAV project was cancelled after it was discovered anti-surface missiles could go past the horizon (which is how these were going to be used).
poik12 7 months ago
Туфта эта америкосская техника
бтр превосходит во всём
roug13 8 months ago
Comment removed
roug13 8 months ago
Русский БТР круче.
Piranoga 8 months ago
Bradley is my favorite from USA..:)
Brcko4s 8 months ago
funny cause the m113 at 0:17 is an australian upgraded version of the gavins which has been adapted and made slightly longer. Just sayin...
StunnedMutha 8 months ago
honestly speaking the equipment shown in this video is not really impressive...
kaplich 9 months ago
america sucks
tulaytulaytulay 10 months ago
@tulaytulaytulay good for you.
RaptorDiablo 9 months ago
what is the name of te music?
LucasOnohara02 10 months ago
страйкер находиться где-то на уровне бтр-80 и полностью уступает 90
shuljup 10 months ago
the bradley does NOT make our nation great. it is a footnote in history - a failed experiment run amok, overbloated over developed crap that came out 20 years behind schedule.
Crawlerz2468 10 months ago
Страйкер они нагло слизали с бтра.
Biogem369 10 months ago
got to say, this stuff looks very dated compared to recent russian armored personal development, guess it's all a matter of perspective
Mr2pint 10 months ago
This music makes America look bad.
winsause 11 months ago 11
@winsause blame the monsters at world music or who the hell ever took the original song away
Stretedge 11 months ago
@winsause how do you figure?
Capt777harris 10 months ago
@winsause this song is from hinder who is from south africa =) not the US
ak907jk 7 months ago
@ak907jk i meant seether i was listening to hinder lol my mind got boggled
ak907jk 7 months ago
SuperGoodman?
Only bombing eh? Sounds like you, if ya are a Russky, got the typical Red political education.
Ya ever hear of Normandy? That was a soldiers fight. Ya ever hear of the Ardiens, aka Battle of the Bulge and a little place called Bastogne? Remagen? Iwo? Tarawa, Guadalcanal, Battle of Monte Cassino?
Then there's Midway, Leyte Gulf, Coral Sea,
and convoys making the Murmansk run, through the Ü Boat gauntlet to those ungrateful Commies.
We could say, Russia did not fight, her Winters
pbfuddle 11 months ago
пиздец ))) даже толком непонимаешь что перед тобой гроб или какаято техника)))))
vadimik1000 11 months ago
Lol Russia got there asses kicked in WW2 if it wasnt for America in WW1 and WW2 Europe would probably be a very different country right now. So dont complain that the US doesnt do anything and were weak cuz we've kicked ass in both World Wars.
Iskate1zEro 11 months ago
american shit
Vyun1969 11 months ago 6
RUSSIA is the LEADER in armor vechicles!!!)))
americans stoleing BTR!))
all russian weapon (Ak-47, btr, bmp) that were made on the experiance of WW2 - now coping by USA and others - because that prooves that USSR have most biggest experiance in WW2 and fight - and prooves that america never fight in WW2 - only bombing! thats why america have best airplanes! US never fight on the ground - coz they COWARDS!
SuperGoodman44 1 year ago
@SuperGoodman44
Oh please! Your BTR and BMP totally sucks. US troops did fight on the ground during WW2 dumbass. WITHOUT US helps you would have speaking Nazi German language dumbass. USSR experience in WW2. Yeah Right! The last time I check the Russian are the one the lose the most causalities in WW2. So much for experience dumbass.
USAAIRPOWER 11 months ago 2
hey asshole, we used to say here more short - without RUSSIA all world would speak nazi german language!!!
by the way do you know why USA gone in Europe?? coz you were afraid that RUSSIANs will first step in Europe and take controll!!))) noone expected that we would kick ass to invincible facists so fast!!!))
learn the history asshole! and drive your shit vechickle for fun - Hummer!!!! )))) you stealed our armor coz understand what Russians understand many years ago after WW2 fight!
SuperGoodman44 11 months ago
@SuperGoodman44 I'd read your post if it was in English, by the way it wasn't the Russians who won WW2, it wasn't England, or France, OR AMERICA. It was a team effort, we ALL beat back Germany. I wish you'd understand we all fought back against them, not like now were you're all (internet wise) fighting each other.
tes4King 11 months ago
@SuperGoodman44 We entered the Second World War because Japan attacked us. We fought not only Nazi Germany, but Italy and Japan, while Russia lost over 30 million casualties just trying to fight the Germans.
You have NO IDEA of what you're talking about, ASSHOLE.
Capt777harris 10 months ago
@USAAIRPOWER Typical american bullshit. YOU join the war when its practically over and then say OH WE"RE SO GREAT WE SAVED ALL OF YOU FROM NAZIS-bullshit. The battle of stalingrad alone had more casualties then all wars america have been in combined. So keep watching your bullshit doscovery channel and stay dumb Fucking pendossian teenager..))
russianinja2008 10 months ago
@russianinja2008 Russians did the same thing against the Japanese. The US had just about crushed Japan and the Soviets came and grabbed as much free land as they could. Also, had the Americans not helped on D-Day west Europe would have been under stalins bootheel after the Russians beat the Germans.
thenoobfactor 10 months ago
@russianinja2008 haha, well said mate.
StunnedMutha 8 months ago
@USAAIRPOWER
> WITHOUT US helps you would have speaking Nazi German language dumbass
and which language would you speak without USSR army?
kaplich 9 months ago
@SuperGoodman44
AK-47 sucks not even accurate! BMP, BTR, and BMD? Oh Please! I see tons of them get destroyed during Six Days Wars, Yom Kippur War, Iraq Iran War, Soviet Afghan War, 1991 Gulf War, and War in Iraq 2003.
Your fucking loser. Russia are cowards to invade US.
XXM1T90XX 11 months ago
Ну что за русская дикая натура заходить на американский сайт и гадить, гадить здесь. Американци к вам на rutube не ходят. Ещё скажите что youtube русские изобрели и американци скопировали...
wimpog97 1 year ago
SHIT -- RPG 32 POWER
Natali88333 1 year ago
I Dislike the Stryker, I prefer the LAV-25
Tehpolev 1 year ago
Stryker, too friggin heavy and not amphibious enough.
Sismiques 1 year ago
vlaful - ты тупая еврейская рожа сперва научись грамотно по русски писать,а потом лизать жопу америкосам!!!!
Lexa898 1 year ago
stupid american close their own herd
Lexa898 1 year ago
nice but the BTR series are more practical
theChrisCustoom 1 year ago
they need improvemnt
starknight97 1 year ago
Страйкер больше похож не на боевую машину а на луноход :DD
GHeldarius 1 year ago
YOUTUBE IS FOR VIDEO NOT FOR PICTURES
shahrin3 1 year ago
why the fuck is it whenever someone posts US military there are a million douche-bags that hop on here and start typing in Russian thinking everything is made cheaper and better in Russia, who gives a shit. go live your life and stop being such a damn troll and thank god Russia isn't the USSR anymore. oh and stop acting like engineers if you where you wouldn't be here talking about some guy's random videos.
assmonkey626 1 year ago 2
@assmonkey626 HAHAHA MAN U JUST SHUT HIM UP HAHAHA
AT0M1CM0NK3Y 1 year ago
0:20 эта машинка обошлась США в 13 млрд долларов, а у нас БМП дешёвенькие и качественные))
вечно они на электричество полагаются, а ведь достаточно небольшого, но направленного...
PoluGON 1 year ago
@PoluGON Чеченцы их с РПГ подрывают, сколько уже их в чечне сгорело... качетвенные....
wimpog97 1 year ago
@wimpog97
Ну и сколько? А сколько подорвали Абрамсов в Ираке?
MarshallJukov 1 year ago
I'm not impressed. Just one word for this silly mashines - "ХУЕТА"
Riltex 1 year ago
ONE OF THE TANKS WAS honey bear from 8th armoud MW2
Hornetman777 1 year ago
why the fuck don't they give that to the boys in afghanistan and IRAQ instead of those fucked up jeeps that are like (fire on me, I'm weak and soft) the boys even need to put wood on their jeeps to try to slow the bullets down, avoiding barely too important injuries .
Antiteshmis 1 year ago
@Antiteshmis bcs this thing cost close to 1.5M (speaking about a stryker) and a hummvee... 140K
axelexele 1 year ago
@axelexele ((140K for the heavy armored version)65K for the standard)
axelexele 1 year ago
наабарот русские капируют технику с сша пример амеикосы сделали f 22 raptor притон с вертикальным и горезонтальным а рускии скапировали с раптора невидемый корпус от радаров и дезайн очен пахош русские даже хамер скопировали так что непездите и смотрите оружие будощего и топ 10 военой техники и будете знать что америкосы сельнее я за us army
русским даже в компьютерных игр амуницую лучше ресуют чтобы покозать что они не бомжи к примеру bad compani 2 вот так
vlaful 1 year ago
@vlaful
Ты наверное морда чухонская про Петра Уфинцева не слышал? Не знаешь что вся технология "стелс" разработана в СССР еще в 1950е годы? И что мы специально ее дали американцам заманив их в ловушку? )))
MarshallJukov 1 year ago
@MarshallJukov русские всегдна что-то разрабатывают новое... после того как это разработали другие страны...
wimpog97 1 year ago
@wimpog97
Как например?
MarshallJukov 1 year ago
Ага... в клипе про american APC's показаны британские Троуджены ))
Ivan1the 1 year ago
У меня кот такими срет...
TheSergeff 1 year ago
Товарищи пендосы, ваше "APC" под стол пешком ходило когда советская техника по болотам в говне плавала и выплывала... Бегайте и дальше с биотуалетом в рюкзаке, да не претендуйте на статус лучшей бронетехники...
Kamowlol 1 year ago
@Kamowlol а американский глиссирующий БТР EFV тоже русские придумали в прошлом столетии наверное... Сами же по телевизору говорите что военная техника 90% устарела... Один авианосец стоит ржавеет
wimpog97 1 year ago
@wimpog97
Конечно - это же БМП-1 (1966) на стероидах с немецким дизелем (Американцы двигатели делать разучились)
К тому же это еще большая хуета чем Бредли и так же не будет ни глиссирующим ни десантируемым в итоге.
Авианосцы уже никому не нужны в эру Клуб-К, П-800 и т д да и наш авианосец не авианосец а авианесущий крейсер с тяжелыми СВЕРХЗВУКОВЫМИ ракетами П-700
В серьезной современной войне авианосец не проживет и часа
MarshallJukov 1 year ago
I see alot of the EFV (would replace our aging AAV's), and it's yet to be put in service.
The bradley is much more of an IFV than an APC nowadays, it's not even capable of swimming any more with heavy armor.
And, while the stryker is high speed and cool, it's a total joke when compared to real 8X8's like the BTR's of russia and LAV it was based on.
And i saw nothing from Cadillac Gage. The M1117 is the coolest APC ever!
peepeevagi 1 year ago
what the music say anybody pls
ete0 1 year ago
@ete0 remedy by seether! THANKS FOR WATCHING!!!
Stretedge 1 year ago
гавно
ReDDDgo 1 year ago
Я уже молу про БТР 90.
Gaiver20007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Смотрел по ТВ канал Дискавери там короче типа супер современное оружие Америки они там придумали типа Страйкер какой то бля копия нашего БТР 80 только у страйкера колеса поменьше))) И прикол в том что наш БТР 80 уже десятки лет гоняет и считается обычным бронетранспортером а у них там ебать копать это супер мега современное оружие теперь)))) вот протоколисты... вечно ржу с этой передачи...
Gaiver20007 1 year ago 3
@Gaiver20007 в каком месте "Страйкер" копия БТР-80 ... я ибу , ну хоть иногда нужно думать ...
csso81 1 year ago
@Gaiver20007
Stryker isn't copy of BTR-80 dumbass. Stryker is better than your old Rusty Cold War APC dumbass.
USAAIRPOWER 11 months ago
Х У Й Н Я .
02Sibalex 1 year ago 45
@02Sibalex У тебя между ног =)
arhangel00010001 4 months ago
@arhangel00010001 ОСТРЯК =)))
02Sibalex 4 months ago
Могу поспорить что у нас спиздили!!!!!!! Ну ничего, вы ещё наш новый БТР-4 в полной комплектации не видели))))))))
Charodei100 1 year ago
:(~~ ~~
ReDDDgo 1 year ago
isn't the bradley a IFV
cluegoo69 1 year ago
Esli wi interesuetis Disaenam tanka to pihite mne uwas toka dermo a ne tanki
schegol89 1 year ago
Just peace of shit, US APC's sucks, so as tanks.
Qlasettaja 1 year ago
Блин, какая же у пиндосов страшная техника, не красивая какая то, несуразная... То ли дело у нас, одна другой краше...
MrFryRus 1 year ago
America rips off designs. They just are pussy and wont admit it!
hellcatdave1 1 year ago
Stills - boo
Fianna10 1 year ago
nice stuff , shity music
DragonlordXV 1 year ago
to much hate in these comments, chill out people.
thumbdownu 2 years ago
o shit talk about a brainack fight those comments are lke 6 lines each
sibigkid1234 2 years ago
agreed
TheMasterNeko 2 years ago
haha russian are very ignorant and they always say that they are the best equip w/c was really stupid and you know why?because they got collapsed after that always stupid and full of illusion and ready to collapsed again!haha no hurt feelings!!!!
cowboylionzden 2 years ago
what is the name of the song?
makedonskiy2007 2 years ago
iamericans are not brain washed its called patriotisum and were all proud of it
sporeman2678 2 years ago
stupid tank
macarubka 2 years ago
гробы, чего еще добавить
q10800 2 years ago
half of what i saw in the video is parody of Russian APC's..
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. Nope. Get you eyes checked.
raiden711 2 years ago
for example starting from 0:55 is parody of Russian BTR...
4CaHeK 2 years ago
oh and last time i checked my eyes it was 100% good, so i suggest u to check ur eyes if u dont see americunt apc looks same like russian BTR, in fact, russian BTR was made years earlier..
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. LOL. I said go get your eyes checked meaning go visit the eye doctor. Then look at the pictures again. Ruskie BTR & BMP series are much wider and have a lower silhouette compared to most other US/Western APCs or IFVs. And before commenting, get your eyes checked for real this time and don't be a lying cunt.
raiden711 2 years ago
well it looks like u need to check your brain too, because i wrote last time i visited eye doctor, my eyes was 100% good. LOL making parody of BTR and making adding changes in it, doesnt change the fact
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. LOL. In your previous comment, you said you checked your eyes yourself not the eye doctor. Even if you did have good eye sight, your facts are from your ass. Only BTR-90 & LAV 25 (which is in the video) look somewhat similar, but LAV 25's appearance design was based on the Swiss MOWAG Piranha.
raiden711 2 years ago
when i wrote that, i ment i went to doctor, was it so hard for you to understand? LOL Swiss MOWAG Piranha is parody of BTR, so lav is a parody of parody? LOL!
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. Piranha was first produced in 1976. LAV-25 was first produced in 1983. Another APC, the Stryker was first used in 2002. The only BTR vehicle that looks similar to the Piranha,LAV-25,or Stryker is the BTR-90. (That is if your eye sight is good you would notice) BTR-90 was first produced in 2004. With these facts, it's more reasonable to say BTR-90 is a parody of Stryker, LAV-25, & Piranha. Not only do you display lack of proof of good eye sight, but lack of knowledge of these vehicles.
raiden711 2 years ago
Lol ur so funny, BTR-90 is modernised version of previous BTR versions, so it doesnt change the fact lav & stryker is parody of previous BTR versions.
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. The previous BTR versions have a very low silhouette & look like rusty metal boxes since they are very old. Because your eye sight is not good, but poor, then I guess it's okay whatever you say based on what you see. However, if you ever want to state a fact, please make sure the source you got it from isn't from your ass. It was funny the first time you said that US APCs are a parody to BTRs, but eventually it gets boring as a repetitive joke.
raiden711 2 years ago
haha i dont really care what you think, the fact is the fact lav & stryker is parody of BTR, well it seems like u REALLY need to change ur brain cause i said many times my eyesight is 100% good, looks like your brain cant understand that =)
4CaHeK 2 years ago
My brain understands what's true & what's a lie. When I read comments with obvious lies & facts said to be true when really it was grabbed from someone's ass, I laugh. Surely you're at least smart enough to realize that an average person with a working brain wouldn't believe a person has good eyesight when saying LAV & Stryker are a parody of BTR when they clearly look different. BTW, if you're going to tell jokes, please tell new ones. An amateur comedian even knows that.
raiden711 2 years ago
this is not joke, this is true lav & stryker is parody of BTR, you just dont want to accept the truth, they have design copied from BTR
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. HAHA. And are you just going to say that without providing a source of proof? Funny how the information I read about LAV-25 & Stryker says the designs of both were derived from the Swiss MOWAG Piranha in which the Swiss made the design themselves. Source: Any article that talks about Stryker or LAV-25 or Swiss MOWAG Piranha. RESEARCH IT FOR YOURSELF, if you don't believe me. BTW, we would be really stupid if we wanted to copy the designs of BTR or BMP.
raiden711 2 years ago
we would be really stupid if we wanted to copy the designs of BTR ---- well if you say so, you are xDD
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. LOL. Unable to summon your courage to research about Stryker, LAV-25 or Swiss MOWAG Piranha? Afraid to realize the fact that these vehicles' designs aren't copied from BTR? I don't understand how anyone could be afraid of performing harmless research. Anyways, I'll only reply when you provide REAL FACTS that support your statement. Otherwise, I'm just wasting my time arguing with a bizarre idiot that doesn't know what he's talking about. Happy Researching! (That's if you're doing it) :)
raiden711 2 years ago
BTR was created before these american coffins, then after BTR's birth, came out these coffins with design copied from BTR..
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. You have still yet to research about the facts of American APCs & IFVs. So what if BTR was created first? Do you ever read your comments? Based on the theme of what you say, I can say all Russian nuclear submarine designs are copied from USS Nautilus because it's the first nuclear submarine? So all Russian nuclear submarines are parody of American nuclear Submarines.
raiden711 2 years ago
starting from 0:56 is parody of BTR design, if you cant see it you really blind or dumb
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. At 0:56, it's a LAV-25 in which the design was derived from the Swiss MOWAG Piranha in which the Swiss made the design completely by themselves. The only BTR version that has similar appearance compared to LAV-25 is the BTR-90, only when viewed from the side. Compare the appearance of both vehicles from all angles of view and you'll know. You are afraid to research information, certainly you aren't afraid to research pictures? If so LOL & I'm wasting my time with a dumb clown.
raiden711 2 years ago
hahaha lol how do u know they made design by they own? u heard they said that and belive it? lol its stupid to belive in everything you hear, in reality, BTR design was made after design from Russian experimental water-ground APC that had no wheels, (mini-version of ZUBR), and later other countrys stole design as very comfortable for apc...
4CaHeK 2 years ago
@4CaHeK. That's your excuse for not researching? LOL. There's a reason why research is performed. Since there are only a few dozen people involved in an APC design process, everyone else must rely on what these designers say to know about their designs. We design our own APCs & other military equipment to suit our own military needs & rival powers like USA & Russia always try to avoid making similar designs. When we copy designs, we would say so. In this case we had said we used Swiss designs.
raiden711 2 years ago
Why research if i know already that americunts copied this design? Fact say this.. I understand ur typical low-iq american, but you need not much brain to realise BTR was made before americunt versions of this vehicle.
4CaHeK 2 years ago
HAHA. Why research you ask? To either learn or make sure what you think you know is correct. Since you are either afraid of researching or you find it hard to swallow the facts, find a way to fix this uncommon problem you have. Other than that, I don't care about your future comments. If we did copy or steal BTR design, surely BTR designers or Russian military would have said this already, but they didn't. The only APCs that have similar BTR designs that we use are for target practice only. :)
raiden711 2 years ago
Im not afraid to research i just dont need it i know my facts is 100% right. Well how do u know Russian military didnt said americunts copy their design? In fact, they say that some times, watch "Voennoe delo" or "Udarnaja sila" there are tons of comaprisons of Russian military vs. western...
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. You're a typical lying cunt. Of course you're afraid of researching because you make pathetic excuses to not research. Your facts are 100% wrong because you don't provide adequate proof in your comments. Appearance doesn't prove anything. And to answer your question, I know because Russian Military has never mentioned the issue on Russian State Media. USA makes almost all of their own designs of military equipment and only borrows a few from their allies & modifies it with permission.
raiden711 2 years ago
HAHAHA the one here cunt is you, ameriCUNT xD well u are thinking americunts made this vehicle BEFORE Russians made BTR, typical low-iq americunt
4CaHeK 2 years ago
It seems you can't read as well. I never said Stryker or LAV-25 was made before BTR. I know BTR was made first before all these vehicles. That doesn't mean we would copy BTR design you simple-minded idiot. Stryker & LAV-25 was based on the Piranha design made completely by the Swiss. As I said before, find your courage to research and don't be a pathetic cowardly cunt by making excuses to not research. It may be hard for you to swallow facts, but a glass of water might help. :)
raiden711 2 years ago
you proved my fact and u still saying my facts are wrong :D now i see u really dumbest nation like world thinks
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. You're continuing to prove to me that you can't read. I said your "fact" of having the Stryker & LAV-25 design to be copied from the BTR is WRONG. BTW, USA attracts 100,000s of international students every year. 600,000+ in 2008. USA is one of the leading countries in innovation. How can USA be dumbest nation? LOL. The term "dumb" was used to describe the US population in the future as a harsh warning if not enough American children get adequate education to keep up with rising population.
raiden711 2 years ago
hahaha "dumb" is word that describes americunt nation now, so easily to brainwash dumbest nation :D. Why dumb? Very simple. Sure makers of coffins shown in video wont say they copied design from BTR, they say they made it by themselves and dumbs like you belive it. americunts belive what they hear and dont think is it true or false, also they dont think about propoganda showing on tv, typical dumb sheep flock.
4CaHeK 2 years ago
The word "dumb" means lacking of intelligence or lacking adequate judgment which perfectly describes you. How? You lack knowledge about USA yet judge our country & people without your brain. LOL. You're the dumb one yourself. And I've repeated many times, Stryker & LAV-25 uses Piranha design which the SWISS made by themselves, we only modified it. If our APCs are "coffins" & you say we copy BTR design, that means BTR is coffin as well? LOL. Read your comments over before posting dumb idiot.
raiden711 2 years ago
ahahha you belive everything you hear, typical brainwashed americunt, you can not accept the truth, but it doesnt mean its not truth, your just angry because u know im right
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. If I knew you were right, then I wouldn't have said you were wrong. You said Stryker & LAV-25 copied BTR design yet you provide no proof. When I have provided proof that the 2 USA APCs uses Swiss Piranha design, you say it's USA propaganda or that I'm brainwashed. HAHA. You're afraid to research about it, so instead you just continue on with your made-up facts. If I were brainwashed, then I would be like you & not research. This is why you're a typical cowardly dumb cunt. Understood? :)
raiden711 2 years ago
haha research what? propoganda? Im not like you beliving everything you hear, in this case americunts made design of their coffins AFTER birth of BTR, sure they say they "made design by themselves" but why then design of these coffins look like BTR's.. Same as in us school brainwash american children that americunts won WW2 xDDD brainwashed nation, because dumb.)
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. This is why you're pathetic. Who is telling you to research propaganda? Research Russian facts about BTR & provide me link where Russian military says USA copied BTR design. Fact is this, Stryker & LAV-25 uses Swiss Piranha design. USA had to buy licenses from the Swiss & given Swiss permission to modify design. And it seems you have no knowledge of anything. Of course USA won WW2 along with UK,USSR, & other ally countries. This is why you're the dumb idiot. Need I say more? :)
raiden711 2 years ago
HAHA and u call me dumb :D I already told u many times i dont need to research if youve had brain u would compare BTR and americunt analog and u would realise they design look SAME, in fact, BTR was made BEFORE americunt coffin.. Im sorry for you, ur dork that compares facts by what is write in internet without using your brain, in FACT, u dont have it xD
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. It seems your brain is not working. I've said before, the only BTR type that looks similar to LAV-25 is BTR-90, yet both APCs only look the same from the SIDE view. Compare both APCs in 3D view & you will see clear differences in exterior design. Yet exterior appearance doesn't prove anything, interior design matters most. Saying you don't need to research is your same old pathetic excuse to not research which proves to me you're a pathetic cowardly idiot. :) I guess you really hate facts.
raiden711 2 years ago
LOL. Omg how stupid can human be, did you even understood what i write? I guess your brain is too small to understand information that i write, americunts made their coffins after BTR, i dont hate facts i know very much facts and i know americunts copied BTR, you belive in everything write in internet, typical brainwashed americunt :)
4CaHeK 2 years ago
HAHA. You did not understand my reply so I suggest you read it again. Your proof of Stryker & LAV-25 to be using BTR design is that appearance is similar from side view & BTR was made first. LOL. This doesn't prove anything. Because your brain is not working & because you're afraid of facts, I'm not surprised by your comments. The reason why I say Stryker & LAV-25 are modified Swedish Piranhas is because USA had to buy manufacturing licenses from Sweden to be allowed to modify Swedish Piranha.
raiden711 2 years ago
Swiss
S300V 2 years ago
Haha you say to me that i write to you, and u think your brain works? LOL! I understand your typical brainwashed americunt, u can not understand that i write to you about your "facts", i just feel sorry for you..
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. You wish we copied BTR design because that would mean BTRs are good. But don't worry Russia's BTR designs are safe. We don't copy things as simple as a steal box on wheels. There are many European & American APC designs that are better than BTR, but Swiss Piranha is best due to its low cost for an advanced & highly capable & versatile APC. Because you don't research, I don't know where you get your facts and because you're afraid to research, you should feel more sorry for yourself. :)
raiden711 2 years ago
as i already said, im not afraid of facts, i know what is facts, and what is "facts", what your telling me to search now, is "facts" and only brainwased like u can belive in them ;)
4CaHeK 2 years ago
Haha. I'm not telling you to research a specific way or for a specific thing. I'm telling you to research your way & tell me where you get the "fact" that Stryker & LAV-25 copied BTR design. This is proof that your brain isn't functioning. :) Since you always make pathetic excuses to not research, anyone would consider this as a symptom of fear of researching. General Dynamics (company that builds Stryker & LAV-25) had to purchase licenses from Sweden in order to copy & modify Piranha design.
raiden711 2 years ago
My brain instead of your is functioning, i already answered you everything and you keep telling same things, you cant understand what i say .
4CaHeK 2 years ago
Haha. Answered what? I haven't asked you any questions. LOL. All I have said to you are facts that prove Stryker & LAV-25 are modified Swiss Piranhas. I repeat what I say because it seems you are the one who can't understand. Anyways, I believe I have given enough facts unlike you who had only provided 1 fact which is that BTR was made first & believing it is adequate proof that American APCs copied BTR design. LOL. This is one of many reasons why I say your brain isn't functioning. Understand?
raiden711 2 years ago
If you didnt know, answer can be without a question, its not my problem your brain cannot understand what im telling to you and saying to me same things that i say to you. Typical for brainwashed americunt ;)
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. Your comment, "I already answered you everything" makes the word "answer" mean a reply or a response to a question. You should know how to use words of a language properly if you plan to use it. Anyways, I need not to explain to you anymore that Stryker & LAV-25 uses Swiss Piranha design since information is everywhere. The only thing stopping you is your fear of researching. BTW, brainwashed people would stick with what they believe & not research to find out the truth. Someone like you.:)
raiden711 2 years ago
Actually , i answered to your "facts", and explained everything, it looks like u cannot understand even i explained everything to you ;) u keep crying about "searching facts" without realising i already explained u about it
4CaHeK 2 years ago
Haha. Telling me that BTR was made first & that LAV-25 looks the same as BTR (yet both APCs only look similar from the SIDE view) is NOT ADEQUATE proof to support your claim that American APCs "copied" BTR design. This is another reason why I think your brain isn't working. I have provided many explanations & one in particular which is perfect proof. American company General Dynamics had to PURCHASE manufacturing LICENSES from Swiss company MOWAG to be ALLOWED to copy & modify Piranha design.
raiden711 2 years ago
"American company General Dynamics had to PURCHASE manufacturing LICENSES from Swiss company MOWAG to be ALLOWED to copy & modify Piranha design." Lol yes, and swiss copied BTR, very simple.
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. Swiss did not copy BTR. BTR & Piranha are two completely different APC designs. Swiss would say so if they copied BTR, but they didn't. Piranha APC is 100% Swiss design.
raiden711 2 years ago
HAHA Sure they would say they stole design from Russians. Dont your words make yourself laugh? :D
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. Now you're saying Swiss stole BTR design instead of copied. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. No country would steal a simple APC design. Swiss would say if they "COPIED" BTR design. Just like General Dynamics said their two APC products (Stryker & LAV-25) are copied & modified Swiss Piranhas. Doesn't your brain's logic make you laugh? :)
raiden711 2 years ago
Well using others idea is same as stole that idea, americunts always copy and stole ideas from other countrys. LOL. And you prove my words yourself, again your saying to me that i say to you. But dont worry, its normal to use others' idea for americunts, because they have very small brain to make their own idea ;)
4CaHeK 2 years ago
LOL. Using someone's design WITH PERMISSION is not stealing. How can any country succeed if its people steal & copy designs,technology, etc. from other people from other countries? Many people have same ideas, only a few have the brains to turn ideas into reality. USA is one of the leading countries in innovation because there are enough Americans who spend a lot of time & money into research & development. My brain is working, your brain is not. So it doesn't matter how "big" your brain is. :)
raiden711 2 years ago
With permission? Dont be rediculous, americunts mostly steal good ideas from others and make them as their own, only brainwashed people like you close their eyes and dont want to see it, well it looks like u realy have problems with brains, its amazing u are great example of americunt, steal my words and use them against me, and saying "my brain is not working" LOL you proved im 100% right ;) americunts canot make something by their own they always steal ideas, now i see im really right.
4CaHeK 2 years ago