Added: 5 years ago
From: NapoleonWill
Views: 353,033
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (474)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • poker is so difficult

  • Sick float on the flop with a backdoor straight though.

  • ship away ivey...haha

  • Where did u see straight?

  • Wait, how does 2 pair beat a straight?

  • @urabusxrw04 u missed a king i think :)

  • @urabusxrw04 there is no straight on the board? you need 5 for a straight not 4..

  • @urabusxrw04 lol there was not straight fill ivey was bluffin the whole way.... 9 10 J Q, one more for a straight

  • @urabusxrw04 lol there was no straight phil ivey was bluffing.... 9 10 J Q, one more for a straight

  • whers patric?

  • @adamo36532 it's Luigi

  • @pedralicamosa o nice 06 vid old skool

  • Non_USA_players_sign_up_at_Ful­l_Tilt_Poker_with_referral-cod­e:FTUS600_and_you_will_get_a_6­00$_signing_bonus

  • Man these rigged sites should be banned!!

  • Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts_USA_pl­ayers_for-real_money_deposits_­and_when_you_sign_up_with_Refe­rral_Code:FTUS600_you_get_a_60­0$_bonus

  • Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at­_account_sign_up_with_Full_Til­t-Poker_gets_you_a_600$_bonus

  • ivey on the river was repping the A... Antonius' hand had showdown value, but he couldnt bet it for value on the river, coz he was goin to get called only by hands that were beatin him.. so by checkin he was lettin ivey to turn many hands into a bluff and thats what ivey did...

  • hêhe_ï_sigñëd_up_át_fùll_tïlt_­pókèr

    _ùsïñg_rëferräl_còdë:_yoU600_å­nd_gòt_a_600_dõllar_bõnüs

  • Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at­_account_sign_up_with_Full_Til­t_Poker_gets_you_a_600$-bonus

  • These poker sites are lame and I know I was cheated out by some non-human program that collects my money. How is it that when I have been playing on real live webcam poker on pokerview there are no crazy fuking bad beats.

  • Poker is a dangerous game, but if you get free bankroll from PokerFrik then you don't really care about it being dangerous :DDD

  • The players came out swinging right off the bat, and if this hand is representative for the kind of action we will see, the spectators are going to be in for a treat. Anyway i just got 50 free $ from Pokerfrik to start my poker carrier, wish me luck :PP

  • Online poker is rigged. They do not have to follow US laws since their servers are outside the states. Compare a few hundred hands to a legit free online poker>>Facebook Texas Holdem. You will see that you will lose more often on any other site that have real money balances compared to this one. PLEASE DO NOT PURCHASE FACEBOOK MONEY!! there is an option..just don't support it

  • lmao pwn3d if you play with real money on pokerstars go to onlinepokercrack . com

  • FREE 50USD

    /watch?v=dPKvO4hPWUA

  • FUCK YOU ALL WITH YOUR BONUS CODES

  • @musstess3890

    Lmao. No Problem I'll hook ya up my FTP ID is niklap3685 :D

    And yep

    Full Tilt Poker the other day announced on their twitter fan site that new players should head on over to Full Tilts webpage, then make a account with the code SPECIALS.

    It's a great promo deal. They will DOUBLE your initial deposit oh and multiple other excellent perks. It is only going work for the first 1500 people that create an account usin this

  • woow!!! :O

    hes really owned :O

    NOOT!

  • I got 600$ from Full Tilt Poker when I used Referral Code: FTUS600 at account sign up

  • How bout that full tilt poker referral code: FTUS600 that gets people 600$ just for signing up with it

  • How bout that full tilt poker referral code: FTUS600 that gets people 600$ just for signing up with it

  • Yes, signing up with the referral code: FTUS600 at Full Tilt Poker really does get you 600$. My friend did it last week.

  • Phil Ivey is an owner of full-tilt. That is what we call a win-win situation my friends.

  • @tjyounglax hahahaahha yeah

  • This is just like a scene from my poker video called "Stuck in a Game Called Texas Holdem".

  • fuck poker

  • Now when few months have passed, Antonius has won all of his money back and more. Are those 50 $ free capital they offer at Pokerfrik site for real?

  • @elcom5515

    Lmao.. If you want to have a heads up match my full tilt ID = alexatunes7669 :D

    And its official

    I learned on the Full Tilt blog recently you make an account on the Full Tilt web site using the code SPECIALS you cant have a full tilt poker account yet though, its only for new players.Its a pretty amazing promo special offer. Make a deposit and they DOUBLE it also a few other important perks. Sadly limited to the first 3500 players that create an account using this

  • @Phillvey33 dude thats the shitty 50% on your first offer, the one you're talking about is 600DEPOSITWIN

  • We’ll never know, but on this hand it might have been more effective. Anyway the best ay to start poker is to take free 50 $ from Pokerfrik website and then learn with those 50 bucks without risk.

  • wtf, he went in with just a draw?

  • @aplayaz2000 Thought he could push the other player off his two pair Q's and J's with a bluffed A's and 3's.

  • Are there some other sites like PokerFrik where you can get 50 $ deposit free?

  • And if the start of the match is any indication, the players have decided to actually reach 50 000 hands in the not too distant future. For those who are looking to start poker check out PokerFrik for a initial 50 $ free deposit!

  • But he wasn’t the only one who had a good day. Three other players managed to notch up six figure wins. And all three got free 50 $ starting capital from PokerKrif website

  • Patrik had also a great WSOP, even though he didn't play himself that many tournaments. Is it really possible to get free 50 $ from Pokerfrik?

  • Lol i just can't believe i really got 50 $ free from PokerFrik website :D

  • Tom Dwan is the best player ever! He also started from the PokerFrik website strategy!

  • There is a simple way to get free 50 $ without any deposit, check out Pokerfrik website. mcompeeqwwrzwafskkdcnasavfodjs­qkodw'jdoqkietiwikumgmuiweqdj

  • Where is PAtrik Antonius stupid idiots?

  • @Florin1913 luigi

  • what a retard....with 10 and 9 he kept going?

    Yanks......

  • @MaxiBoOoY yeah, Phil Ivey, one of the top poker players in the world is an idiot... great call mate.

  • @MaxiBoOoY these are not your 0,01-0,02$ stakes moron, where everything is obvious, they think on a complete different level. you sir are the retard.

  • If you really want a consistent winrate playing onlinepoker, you need to let a bot play a large amount of hands for you.

    me and 3 other MIT students developed a poker bot with an almost perfect game during a projekt.... Now i think it is time to let the bot loose on the sites... Watch this video for more!:

    watch?v=_s90ooMpVLo

  • @MegaFlemo

    Your telling me your a MIT student and you cant even spell projeCt ...

    get fucking real

  • @cookiekoen

    i think u mean "you're"

  • @ShynessIsGolden1

    Any poker player that comments that they would have folded just lyin.!

    Yes I can answer that question, my advice to a new cash game player is to score some free cash from Full Tilt using registration code UTUBEBONUS.

    Using this method, you can get double your first deposit. For example deposit $30 to your new Full Tilt account, and they will award you an additional $30. It works up to 500 bucks! Great for someone just starting off.

  • loll nice try with the title

    "Phil Ivey Gets Owned By Patrik Antonius in $80,000 pot"

    huh but yea Phil Ivey lost bad bluff with 3 over cards out he he's Phil Ivey and makes Millions of dollars and i don't so maybe i shouldnt talk lol but Ivey just doesn't give a fuck when it comes too money, if he has to bet a 300k bluff to win a pot with 2/5 offsuit that guy would do it

  • An obvious steal attempt by Phill. Even I can see that...

  • bad play

  • i dont think this is fake money

  • @JtvClipz antonius plays under that username, so yes it is him

  • im no expert.. but wat was ivey thinking? if he was bluffing.. it was pretty bad

  • of course it wansnt, hes getting over 45% Equity by shoving there

  • @killinhillbillys Ivey can rep a ton there, wtf are you talking about? And why are you getting thumbs up? -.-

  • @onlnr2 i did say i wasnt an expert didnt i? unless you cant read. ivey raised when he had a 10 and a 9 (of clubs) and there was 3,3,J on the board, it would have been very unlikely to get a straight or a flush. Im not sure what 'rep a ton' means, do you mean reap a ton?

  • @killinhillbillys flush, trips, and full house possibilities on that board, both players showed a ton of strength and PA's hand loses to a single Ace. Doesn't seem like a bad spot to bluff here at all. In fact, it's a great bluff... with an equally great bluff catch

  • i think mjazgun was being sarcastic... ppl prob fort he was serious so gav 5 thumbs down

  • Is this real money? Holy shit

  • i think patrick raised on the flop bc most likely ivey didnt hit anything on that flop...when ivey calledt he raise he probly might have put him on like k a jack and when ivey called on the turn he didnt put him on a flush cause he probly would have raised in that position..and when the ace came antonio took long bc he thought ivey of hit 2 pair on the river with his aj...imo

  • baaaaaa

  • crazy call on antonius' part.

  • crazy call from ivey when he called the raise from antonious after the flop was out....

  • @pakimadarchod its called a float

  • @pakimadarchod floating

  • that is not patrick antonious

  • send me $2000 craig-olson on fulltilt. Ty have great day:)

  • Lol, not even close. nh

  • I haven't watched the full hand yet, i'm at the turn. Does Ivey has a Flush and Antonius a Full House?

  • Find out yourself lazy bastard

  • ivey learned a quick lesson its hard to bluff on online poker. His bluffing is what ruins his style. He bluff a little lesson often i think he would get less callers.

  • sowwy ivey lol

  • actually the fact that he called ISNT that good of a play.

    he should have made a reasonable Defensive bet on the river.

    ivey had no other way to win.

    so why teh fuck not when u have millions.

  • Ive seen Phil ivey make 2.9 mill at craps and burn 1.2 mill in the same day.......he dont give a fuck.

  • @tomdamho yeah,this is why he sold his house for only 2 mil....im telling you,he gives a fuck,and i hate him

  • @tomdamho lol

  • @tomdamho where you see that ?

  • LOL Ivey is trying to play like Tom Dwan bluffing his money away. These pros should stick with the live game because they suck online.

  • Are you stupid or just retarded?

  • "A little from column A and a little from column B."

    -Homer Simpson

  • Abe Simpson AKA grampa said that.

    homer was fleeing the house while his dad distracted em.

    unless i missed the irony, but i dont think i did ^_^

  • But it would be interesting to know Ivey's thinking on the river, what hands does he think PA's going to fold with those pot odds on the river? The pot is already 33K(? blurry video) and he bets all-in 20K, that's not a very good ratio since PA's getting over 2.6-1 on a call so not too much fold equity there.

  • I think PA checks the river because if Ivey has nothing then Ivey's not calling a river bet and if Ivey has him beat then Ivey is calling or raising the river (unless Ivey has a made marginal hand that has showdown value in which case Ivey would check behind).

    So basically Ivey's river bet says: "I either have you beat or I'm bluffing and try to get you fold by making a big bet". By checking Patrik can get value from bluffs, busted draws etc. which he could not if he bet the river himself.

  • what I want to know is why Phil flat called that 11k bet on the turn, with Antonius clearly having him beat with either 2 pair, top pair, high pockets, a set or a flush draw hand I don't understand phil's call. At best PA had 9 cards he could get to win on a draw, in which case phil would have 6, at worst he had the nut flush already.

  • sorry, I meant 8 cards

  • I think Ivey was setting PA up for a major bluff on the river. What Ive noticed pros do is call you down with squat knowing youre either drawing to a hand or have a marginal hand & make a monster bet or raise (depending on your action & position) on the river. In this case, Ivey should have raised all in on the turn (I think) to impersonate the flush. Ivey played this hand very weird, & bcuz of that, PA was getting pot odds to call on the river anyway, but wouldnt have if Ivey pushed on the turn

  • it's because phil didn't want to give his bluff away, if I hit a flush draw, i wouldn't go all in i would try to get some more chips in and not scare my opponent away. then again there is a reverse psychology to that

  • I like youtube-trolls talking shit when it comes to poker. Not having pot odds to call on the turn? 2-1 with top two is pretty good odds imo.

  • These guys are playing at such a high level I don't think you can really simplify it like that. Phil was probably calling even moreso to bluff on the river than to try and make his hand.

  • reason why you don't know is why phil ivey has 10.9 million in tournament earnings and you don't.

  • ok pro

  • no he checked the river because any ace would have beat him.

  • honestly, 80k. is nothing to phil ivey

  • 80k is nothing to either of them lol.

  • @blahblah5492 doesnt matter, THey still play to win. Ivey thought he was weak enough to steal the pot and he was wrong. He was bluffing to a full house and thought his check raise was weak on the flop. Players at this level play paired flops very aggressivly and even try to float because the chance that the flop hit them in unlikely. Still Ivey's bet on the river is strong, he could be repping a flush or a fullhouse and still a tough call for 2pair, but he knew he was in trap mode.

  • if thats antonius it must be old coz antonius plays under his name now

  • he didnt call on a draw... he called on the flop because he was looking to bluff and take the pot. you think he was looking for a backdoor straight on a flop with two diamonds on it already?

  • I think Ivey told a good story (ran a good bluff), but unfortunately Patrik is a calling station...just like when he called down Phil Laak with the 10-4 of spades on HSP...the guy is unbluffable...you need to pick the guys you bluff and if you see Patrik calling you down...it's time to shut it down and wait for when you have the nuts and have him pay you off then...

  • He Check-raised the flop, bet the turn, pushed in on the river, and you call him a calling station?

  • he didn't PUSH on the river...Ivey pushed on the river...Patrik checked because he wasn't sure he had the best hand (he just wanted to show down)...Ivey made the most of his position at the end...just hard to bluff a calling station...thus the check/CALL on the river from Patrik...

  • were is patrick antonius

  • he's luigi, this was before they got their custom avatars

  • lol in the end "ship away ivey"

  • i don't understand this play by ivey. he's called the flop re-raise to bluff, but he's then bluffed when antonius is pot-committed anyway. from ivey's betting pattern he either has everything or nothing, so surely antonius will look him up with even a moderate hand.

  • He called while on a draw, and by the end of the hand he was pot committed and he was going to lose if he didnt atleast make an attempt at it. He sold a pretty good story imo as if he was either waiting for the flush *semi bluff on flop* and hit it, or he was trappign with trips.

  • If the bluff worked 70% of the time you get

    .7(50) - .3(100) = +5 EV

    This is where poker theory is flawed. If you realize how much money you are investing to earn so little, plus account for the time value of money, you likely end up at a loss even if you have a +EV over time. Plus there are many situations that do not allow sufficient trials.

  • the math does not completely show the reality. Cos the next time Evey HAS a hand (that beats antonius), patric can call much more often...

  • As for the bluffing aspect, it gets to be too limiting, in that, it only works on good players because donks call w/ anything and can't fold. Then good players know what is happening and call down w/ 2 pair on that ridiculous board. Either way, there is usually -EV if there is absolutely no draw.

    Think about it mathematically. Even if a "three barrel" bluff works 60% of the time resulting in a 50% increase, and does not work 40% resulting in going broke

    = .6(50) - .4(100) = -10 EV

  • ur right. bluffing only works with people who actually knows how to play the game. i suffered many ridiculous calls back in my early days of poker time. those people just simply doesnt know how to put u on a hand.

  • part of being a good poker player is observing what players can put you on a hand and which can't. if you're bluffing and it's not working over a large sample it makes somebody a bad player but it's not always who YOU think it is

  • i feel like it was a horrible call. a 3, any two diamonds, aj.... these are all hands anybody would play in this situation. ivey bet pre and post flop, got raised and he called. that could suggest two diamonds, if not AJ.antonious bets his 2 pair at about 2/3 the pot, and Ivey calls! that should slow antonious down ( which it did) if not completely take him off the hand. checked to ivey and hes all in for 2/3 again after an ace hits?

  • Don't even begin to analyze this hand. You have no cue what the meta game is I guarantee both these players consciously keep their ranges more wide open than a 1/2 NL donk

  • So that means, because of the loose style of players in this game, one should draw to a straight when flush and boat possibilities are already on board?

  • why do u think people watch these vids? to watch ppl win money? no. well u might. but i watch to learn. analization is key to improvement, and pros are constantly anylazing other people game and style, not to mention thier own. why would I not anylize? I'm obviously not saying I'm a better player than either one, but someone who isn't in the hand (i.e. me) has a different perspective. I'm fully aware of what they are aware and consious of. 1/2 NL donk...meta-game.... good one.

  • Ok, I'll tell you what happened in this hand. Antonius knows that Ivey probably wouldn't just a river with just an ace. It's simple if Ivey shoved that river with an ace, he would be very exploitable to having the nuts checked to on the river and being trapped. He doesn't put Ivey on calling the turn with A high, so it makes no sense for him to have an ace here. So Ivey is either trapping on the turn with a flush or is bluffing.

  • Why could Ivey never have the Ad on the turn?

    You don't make much sense Roscoe.

  • Anal-ization is obviously very important; but I personally prefer to analyze or obtain a good analysis on the matter...

  • No, what I'm saying is Ivey might be calling to bluff on certain cards that hit the board, He might actually hit the straight, he might be trying to mix up his calling range for the future. Who knows. I mean neither is mistake free, it's a game of mistakes esp. HU, but their mistakes are gonna be so minimal that for me to sit here and say one was a bad play when I have no idea of the metagame circumstances / ebb and flow of the match would be naive.

  • I guess he would just check AJ, but he would deff shove with a boat or flush. Is it me, or did antonious just get really lucky. ivey played it damn near perfect, but like 'fanofrealhiphop' said... this is petty cash to them.

  • Another point, it's not petty cash to them. I'm aware of what they make but they play in games to where it matters because why would they play the game at all to begin with? They aren't doing it for fun, lol.

    If you are giving Ivey credit for a boat or flush here everytime, then you have no hand reading abilities and are giving these guys way to much credit for big hands when they mix their range up so much. Basically you have no idea what you are talking about, hence my original post.