Crysis still had better graphics. All they did was bump up the Ambient Occlusion and add a shit ton of Bump Maps everywhere in C2. I can still run C2 on Max settings but can only run Crysis on Medium.
@Filmshite Polycount isn't everything. In fact, especially nowadays when we have excesses of 50,000 polygons on some models, plus the inclusion of bump-mapping, normal-mapping, and tessellation, graphics are more benefiting from advances in shaders and physics than anything. Just go on a game like Skyrim. The models in skyrim use the same amount of Polys across all fields of graphics quality. The differences in graphics come from shaders and textures, and the differences are night and day.
Yea I agree but its like shaders and lighting have got to a level that it cant be impoved much more without future technology like real time ray tracing, so the devs at direct X just put alot of effot into tessellation and displacement mapping.
There is a big difference in quality between a flat brick wall and a tessellated brick wall.
@kevlar60442 Very well put, i do agree, but i still think for any more progression a dramatic polygon count increase is nessecary , obviously included with advanded processing power. Frame rate and general physic's need improving also, i would love to see final fantasy Cgi cutscene's quality in a playable format that would just be awesome.
@kevlar60442 yeah, Crysis 2 had some beautiful sights, like when you get out of the building at the begining of the game, when you enter in New York in that same level, or near the end of the game when the park starts floating.
Man, there has GOT to be a better recording solution these days than Fraps. A lot of games allow demo recording via console commands or even an in-game menu option. Fraps just doesn't cut it.
@drytaffin Eh, Crysis looked really plain to me. Sure, Crysis 1 had better textures, but they were buggy at times, and I loved the artistic design in Crysis 2, and they put a lot more detail into buildings and vehicles and whatnot. And the lighting was MUCH better in Crysis 2 IMO.
@drytaffin That's because Cry Engine 2 can achieve much more than the quality at Very High settings, is just they are locked so that people don't started raging (omg, this is imposible to run) and shit like that.
For all those who say that some games have bad graphics. The developers can easyly make every game look just as good as crysis 2 if now much better the problem is how many ppl will be able to run them
@Jeroenneman wrong crysis 2 has better physics larger environments goes to crysis 1 (who cares?) do you even have the game? the story is set in a city. you can go download some forest maps.
@dragonxanimation yes, it's a fact /watch?v=EcyOn5P7L0g Crysis2 console-game and thats why it has worse detail and destruction, smaller territory, etc.
@InfanTerorizm this video looks better and all it is is hd textures.detail, destruction, territory depend on the game crysis 2 still has a better engine
@InfanTerorizm i repeat-"this video looks better and all it is is hd textures.detail, destruction, territory depend on the game crysis 2 still has a better engine" cryengine 3 is not a console port -_- use the sdk and tell me that. it has way better graphics on dx11 that cryengine 2 don't act like you know all about the engine
@18T220 Not really. The graphics could possibly be better and most likley will be. The rage engine is for things like car damage etc, it only plays a tiny part in graphics.
wow, things got bumpy, thats huge deal right? I would rather just have actual exclusives to play than waste money to make things bumpy. And since next gen game systems will be out soon, What I have will keep me very happy till the next generation
killzone 3 look better tahn this i finished this game on my gamerpc but still killzone 3 better graphics.. and crysis2 looked better with dx9.. dx11 have bullshit effects...
@ubisoftac Are you retarded? Killzone 3!? Wow, you blind cunt. DX11 looks much better then DX9. You fail man. Did you play with low graphical settings?
@59Hellfire not really......cryengine 3 is as powerfull just that it has better HDR and and color grading and is a bit more flexible.....like those crysis mods that you see....it doesn't look better only because of a hell of a lot of optimisation in the textures and shaders. And whatever features that crysis 1 had is not in crysis 2...like.......trees
even if new consoles come out they will still kind of be out matched because on jan.9 7970 from amd shall be released and new cpus, has Ivy bridge come out yet?
games are getting shitty these days- no fun, but extra realistic graphics, ultra hdr and who knows what else. it should not even be called games, there is no game in it.
Doubt it real time ray tracing is way off. Considering how long it takes to render a good caustics image or even a raytracing reflection or even raytraced shadows.
Remember Tessellation has barely been used at all. Look at the Heaven benchmark thats how much games need to be using it. Tessellation will replace most bump maps and games will look a lot better. They just need to use it more in game.
Also texture resolution needs to get bigger faster.
@18T220 exactly. I mean with crysis 1, crytek basically said "Fuck it, we want to make the most amazing looking game ever, fuck consoles" And thats what they did. the next gen consoles....wont be able to run Crysis 1 on Cryengine 2 that is. With it on CE3 its like on medium, and can get 30 fps. Shit...my Superclocked 570 can get about 45fps at 1080p with no AA.
@18T220 When the next gen consols is rady to buy the computer is even 6 level over the next gen so if you want High end graphics go away from your consoles and go and get a nice pc
@18T220 What about the guys at "unlimited detail" with their algorithm for cloud point data graphics which allows for a huge amount of detail with a tiny amount of processing power!
@18T220 Its not a struggle >.> they just want to stick with motion control and try to make as much money as possible. If they wanted they could make a new cheap console, but sadly they care more about money then quality.
Microsoft and Sony actually lose money when first releasing their consoles because of the expensive hardware. They make money off the games. Just saying...
@18T220 you really think devs will invest big money into pc games with ray tracing? 3.9 Million people pirated crysis 2! 3.4 Million pirated BF3! 4.5 Million pirated witcher 2.. out of them only the witcher 2 crossed 1 million sales!
Ray tracing won't come until consoles are ready for them.. PC players holds PC back shame.. :(
This is why crytek has stated they will never create another pc exclusive AAA game.. And rightfully so.. More cash in the console cow!
@18T220 which would make sense, since pc tech would make mainstream ray tracing in games possible sometime in 2014-2015! ... I just don't see it happen this year or the year after next.. the dam tech required for true ray tracing is too god dam expensive.. I doubt next gen consoles are going to have ray tracing though..
@abram730 do you realize how expensive it will be to make games look like that?? Won't happen anytime soon especially on pc.. It will not make enough money in return as it's to easy to pirate..
@BeastlyRig It would happen in like 20 years. Like the change from DOOM 1 to Crysis. That's the change level expected. So, not really soon, but in like 10 or 20 years, it will be there.
Will my framerate drop by using the hd textures? if so about how much? I am getting 40 fps on high @ 720p, i don't want to lower any settings to accommodate the hd textures
@18T220 "Even" BF3 demands slightly less than Crysis 2. Crysis 1 is the most demanding game, but badly optimized. Crysis 2 came for consoles too so they had to drop down the system requirements for that.
He's correct, Crysis 2 is more demanding than Crysis 1 on MAX and Battlefield 3 on MAX. The only game I own that is more demanding than Crysis 2 DX11 is GTA IV on max settings with Enb series mod.
@18T220 Well IMO. How is it that the most used games for Benchmarking are Crysis and Battlefield 3? Crysis is still bragged to be the most demanding game all over the forums with battlefield 3 coming close.
I dont read forums. I play the games on max settings and see how much FPS i get. Crysis 2 on DX9 runs very easy 60+ FPS but with the HD textures & DX11 patch it is about 8 FPS lower than Crysis DX10 and 12FPS lower than Battlefield 3 DX11 overall.
@18T220 >with the HD textures, there are HD textures for Crysis 1 aswell if you didnt know, that will dramaticly drop the fps. Without texture packs and shit, Crysis is more demanding. It is counted without addons.
@TheDrunkenKhajiit or just save his money and get SLI. only retards and pc bashers spend money like that for GPU. if he wants that GPU then let him you child.
@raven33629 Lag?There is no fucking lag you fucking retarded un-educated shit.Lag is when you have a high amount of Ping while playing online that has to do with memory and internet connection and speed.He has only 20 FPS (frame rates per second)because he is recording with FRAPS which eats alot of memory.Educate yourself for god sake.
@Lakozte I was able to run Crysis with all settings on high except shaders on medium with theAasus x 1600. It's not only a video card problem. You have to take care of your computer. What I mean is that I keep a lot of free space on the disk, I run defrag, I blocked all the unnecessary process, I modified the graphic of windows (it's heavy), and all of those things. If you do that, you will see a lot of difference.
Alright, now I'm calling bullshit. You obviously have no experience whatsoever with computers if you claim you can even RUN Crysis on high with an ati x1600 man. That card struggles to compete with a nvidia 6600 GT.
Stop tellin us bullshit man. I don't fancy hating on you but I can see when someone is spewing out shit out of his mouth.
Also, reviews tell us that the 6450 pulls an "amazing" 9.7 fps in crysis with 4xaa, high on settings and an astonishing 1680x1050 resolution.
@Lakozte I'm a programmer. If you want go to my channel. You'll find a video of Far Cry 2, high-very high settings. O know how to take care of my computer. I also know how to program. I'm sending you a personal message, watch the video in the link, I recorded a little video of Far Cry 2, with almost all settings on max, and ati x 1600. I have things to attend, au revoir
@18T220 i run Crysis 2 on max And BF3 Minimum!! :((
LasciLP 3 days ago
@LasciLP
Hows that, My PC runs BF3 on maxs better than Crysis 2 on max.
What GPU do you have?
18T220 3 days ago
O.o? ??
BloodyRoar02 6 days ago
Crysis still had better graphics. All they did was bump up the Ambient Occlusion and add a shit ton of Bump Maps everywhere in C2. I can still run C2 on Max settings but can only run Crysis on Medium.
MrMcScabberz 6 days ago
@MrMcScabberz
Wierd, I get lower FPS with Crysis 2 DX11 on max than I do with Crysis DX10 on max.
Some how Crysis 2 DX11 on max settings for me is more demanding than Crysis DX10 and even BF3 DX11 max.
You got an AMD or Nvidia GPU?
18T220 6 days ago
@18T220 techreport com/articles.x/21404
Lower "object detail" one step and watch your FPS soar.
doltBmB 4 days ago
graphics was awesome but the game sucked.
smart2click 1 week ago
Comment removed
beliarweapon 1 week ago
if you can runcrsis 2 with extra not ultra. can you run BF3? I have an asus G60vx with a cooling mod
EmPiREx220 1 week ago
@EmPiREx220
yes if you can run crysis 2 on medium you can run BF3 on medium.
18T220 1 week ago
@18T220 no its false
911trupak2011 1 week ago
This isnt ULTRA graphics ITS HARDCORE!!!!
Neil3600 1 week ago
graphics wont look entirely better until the polygon count goes up anyway , it will always be polished shit until that happens
Filmshite 1 week ago
@Filmshite Polycount isn't everything. In fact, especially nowadays when we have excesses of 50,000 polygons on some models, plus the inclusion of bump-mapping, normal-mapping, and tessellation, graphics are more benefiting from advances in shaders and physics than anything. Just go on a game like Skyrim. The models in skyrim use the same amount of Polys across all fields of graphics quality. The differences in graphics come from shaders and textures, and the differences are night and day.
kevlar60442 1 week ago
@kevlar60442
Yea I agree but its like shaders and lighting have got to a level that it cant be impoved much more without future technology like real time ray tracing, so the devs at direct X just put alot of effot into tessellation and displacement mapping.
There is a big difference in quality between a flat brick wall and a tessellated brick wall.
18T220 1 week ago
@kevlar60442 Very well put, i do agree, but i still think for any more progression a dramatic polygon count increase is nessecary , obviously included with advanded processing power. Frame rate and general physic's need improving also, i would love to see final fantasy Cgi cutscene's quality in a playable format that would just be awesome.
Filmshite 1 week ago
Technical Merit? Crysis 1 is the clear winner.
Artistic Design? Crysis 2 takes the crown.
kevlar60442 2 weeks ago
@kevlar60442 yeah, Crysis 2 had some beautiful sights, like when you get out of the building at the begining of the game, when you enter in New York in that same level, or near the end of the game when the park starts floating.
gmk120 1 week ago
Man, there has GOT to be a better recording solution these days than Fraps. A lot of games allow demo recording via console commands or even an in-game menu option. Fraps just doesn't cut it.
breathingreflection 2 weeks ago
I still prefer Crysis 1's graphics, they are better IMO, especially when the game is modded.
drytaffin 2 weeks ago
@drytaffin Eh, Crysis looked really plain to me. Sure, Crysis 1 had better textures, but they were buggy at times, and I loved the artistic design in Crysis 2, and they put a lot more detail into buildings and vehicles and whatnot. And the lighting was MUCH better in Crysis 2 IMO.
kevlar60442 2 weeks ago
@drytaffin That's because Cry Engine 2 can achieve much more than the quality at Very High settings, is just they are locked so that people don't started raging (omg, this is imposible to run) and shit like that.
gmk120 1 week ago
I truly love tessellation =D
xXxLyssexXx 3 weeks ago
Unreal Engine 3 looks so much better and doesn't need a powerful rig to run it.
simpsoncheat 3 weeks ago
For all those who say that some games have bad graphics. The developers can easyly make every game look just as good as crysis 2 if now much better the problem is how many ppl will be able to run them
Kirage47 3 weeks ago
you can do this with single HD6870? I will make magic in this game w/ my HD5770 CrossfireX :D
BritishNathan 3 weeks ago
Dx 11 makes my Crysis 2 run a little laggy, but it looks waay better than dx9 if you know where to look at
tchmotors 3 weeks ago
can someone teach me how to properly shit my pants? cuz i splattered all over the place xP
LoWmister7 3 weeks ago
Crysis 1 still has better physics.
And larger environments, more freedom and much more inspiring environments.
Fuck this Urban jungle shit, just look grey and dull when compared to a lush jungle!
Jeroenneman 4 weeks ago
@Jeroenneman wrong crysis 2 has better physics larger environments goes to crysis 1 (who cares?) do you even have the game? the story is set in a city. you can go download some forest maps.
dragonxanimation 3 weeks ago
the image in the thumb looks real life no doubt
DesertstormPT 4 weeks ago
Gotta love that tessellation.
Geophaser 4 weeks ago
@18T220 graphics mods
JeFfHaRdY9571 4 weeks ago
haha graphic could be better :D
MyChannel717 1 month ago
next step is to get rid of polygons..
marcelkade 1 month ago
Crysis > Crysis 2
InfanTerorizm 1 month ago
@InfanTerorizm heellll no
dragonxanimation 3 weeks ago
@dragonxanimation yes
InfanTerorizm 3 weeks ago
@InfanTerorizm no
dragonxanimation 3 weeks ago
@dragonxanimation yes, it's a fact /watch?v=EcyOn5P7L0g Crysis2 console-game and thats why it has worse detail and destruction, smaller territory, etc.
InfanTerorizm 3 weeks ago
@InfanTerorizm i meant graphics..... the engine is way better
dragonxanimation 3 weeks ago
@dragonxanimation i repeat - detail, destruction, territory, all this better in Crysis. And Crysis2 dont have mod like this
InfanTerorizm 3 weeks ago
@InfanTerorizm this video looks better and all it is is hd textures.detail, destruction, territory depend on the game crysis 2 still has a better engine
dragonxanimation 3 weeks ago
@dragonxanimation no, this video looks worse and engine3 not better, it just for console too
InfanTerorizm 3 weeks ago
@InfanTerorizm
Cryengine 3 is better than Cryengine 2.
Nothing beats Crysis 2 DX11 graphicaly.
18T220 3 weeks ago
@18T220 Crysis dx11 looks better than Crysis2 dx11. And has bigger territory, more destruction and detail. Thats what i call beats, bgg
Cryengine 3 not better than Cryengine 2, it just work on few platforms
InfanTerorizm 3 weeks ago
@InfanTerorizm
Crysis has DX9 & DX10 not DX11.
Shows how much you know.
18T220 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InfanTerorizm i repeat-"this video looks better and all it is is hd textures.detail, destruction, territory depend on the game crysis 2 still has a better engine" cryengine 3 is not a console port -_- use the sdk and tell me that. it has way better graphics on dx11 that cryengine 2 don't act like you know all about the engine
dragonxanimation 3 weeks ago
@InfanTerorizm thats a mod...
dragonxanimation 3 weeks ago
@18T220 I fucked up my GTA with mods :(
DennisDzeko 1 month ago
@18T220 Not really. The graphics could possibly be better and most likley will be. The rage engine is for things like car damage etc, it only plays a tiny part in graphics.
Moggaftw11 1 month ago
@18T220 GTA 5 doesn't look as GTA 4 ! JESUS WATCH THE FUCKING TRAILER !
Lepsyp 1 month ago
Image this graphic on GTA 5 ? OMG
DennisDzeko 1 month ago
wow, things got bumpy, thats huge deal right? I would rather just have actual exclusives to play than waste money to make things bumpy. And since next gen game systems will be out soon, What I have will keep me very happy till the next generation
nejisdeath 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
killzone 3 look better tahn this i finished this game on my gamerpc but still killzone 3 better graphics.. and crysis2 looked better with dx9.. dx11 have bullshit effects...
ubisoftac 1 month ago
@ubisoftac
Wrong, Killzone 3 cant match these graphics. And you saying Crysis 2 looked better with DX9 is just plain retarded.
18T220 1 month ago 56
@18T220 actually killzone 3 really looks better... just look up the snow levels..
Screep5 1 month ago
@Screep5 They don't look better, they are lubed with a shit load of motion blur and DoF.
CLICKMEYOULOSER 1 month ago
@18T220 youre right
AdolphOttoEichmann 1 month ago
@18T220 killzone 3 can beat these graphics
Megatronicful 3 weeks ago
@Megatronicful
Do you want to explain to me why you said that? Facts.
18T220 3 weeks ago
@Megatronicful ehm not but ok crysis 1 and 2 can beat killzone btw
ShirO1291 3 weeks ago
@18T220 why the hell you hate kz3 so much ? anyways both are great and kz3 is better than any halo shit bro !
SWORDENxxxSPARDA 2 weeks ago
@SWORDENxxxSPARDA
I dont hate Killzone 3.
18T220 2 weeks ago
@ubisoftac LMFAO
GeForce440gt 1 month ago
@ubisoftac wft ?!, wait i mean -what the fuck-
lafincow12 1 month ago
@ubisoftac Are you retarded? Killzone 3!? Wow, you blind cunt. DX11 looks much better then DX9. You fail man. Did you play with low graphical settings?
CLICKMEYOULOSER 1 month ago
@ubisoftac DX9 > DX11 haha are you stupid? you have a gamer PC, really? so if it is true I'm playing xbox720 now...
95928225 1 month ago
@ubisoftac i think, u have pentium 2
InfanTerorizm 3 weeks ago
@ubisoftac Comparing PS3 to PC?
Comparing DX9 10 DX11?
boston91388 3 weeks ago
@ubisoftac you ubersack
MegaTimebomb098 3 weeks ago
@ubisoftac 1. Killzone is only for ps3. I bet you liked dx9 more cause you didn't lagg as much than you did on dx11.
MrThewowplayer 3 weeks ago
You can still see that the barrels are segmented. Wake me up when everything round is as it shoud be.
bokany 1 month ago
zaraz skad tam polskie drogi??
TheDekodek123 1 month ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
can i run this games at ultra or high graphics with this specs?
AMD Athlon II X2 250 3.01GHz
3 GB RAM DDR2 Kingston 800MHz
160GB Hard Disc
Windows 7 Ultimate 32 Bits
MOBO: ASRock N68-S DDR2 1066
Video Card: AMD Radeon Sapphire HD6770 1GB DDR5
MartinBolso25 1 month ago
is this a free roam(sandbox) game??
serkir121 1 month ago
@serkir121 you can get a physics sandbox for the game if you use a good gaming computer.
mastererik323 1 month ago
Sounds like Battlefield BC :D
wowere5 1 month ago
@18T220
very nice. i goot a GREAT price on min
zaca211 1 month ago
What company made your HD 6870.
i got a GIGABYTE 6870
zaca211 1 month ago
I wonder what will the new halflife look like after the years of development
MultiMaZaa 1 month ago
wow this makes bf3 look average..
NancyxBrito 1 month ago
wasser schafft keiner! keine richtigen einschusslöscher, voll unrealistisch etc. etc.
GOD ftw! :)
kogo187 1 month ago
Amazing! few questions what is ray tracing and tesselation?
XxDRAGMANxX 1 month ago
@Youpala01
i found it! :D
press view all coments then CTRL+F type in SteveArgen2 and TADA! XD
Darnok1221 1 month ago
Supposed use of tesselation: Easily bring a new not yet seen level of detail into game environment.
Crysis-style use of tesselation: Crank up polycount on that cement slab so that game will require DX11 and latest hardware.
3zzzTyle 2 months ago
Crysis 2 on DX11 beats BF3
1Adr1an6 2 months ago
i honestly think that cryengine 2 is much better than cryengine 3 graphics wise. but thats just my opinion
59Hellfire 2 months ago
@59Hellfire not really......cryengine 3 is as powerfull just that it has better HDR and and color grading and is a bit more flexible.....like those crysis mods that you see....it doesn't look better only because of a hell of a lot of optimisation in the textures and shaders. And whatever features that crysis 1 had is not in crysis 2...like.......trees
topgear93 2 months ago
@topgear93 true
59Hellfire 2 months ago
@topgear93 There are way better textures for some plants though and way more plants.
legolasisahobbo 2 months ago
@18T220 Or Windows Vista
LakoonPlay 2 months ago
Comment removed
KevSGB 2 months ago
even if new consoles come out they will still kind of be out matched because on jan.9 7970 from amd shall be released and new cpus, has Ivy bridge come out yet?
96stewie96 2 months ago
@satyam171 Do you really need Windows7 for this Game ???
KevSGB 2 months ago
windows xp 32 bit
2*3ghz
geforce gts 450
2 gb Ram
will it run ???
KevSGB 2 months ago
games are getting shitty these days- no fun, but extra realistic graphics, ultra hdr and who knows what else. it should not even be called games, there is no game in it.
TheUrzur 2 months ago
will have to wait until the next gen consoles come out and push the bar up....
classiccelebs 2 months ago 2
@classiccelebs
Next gen consoles will struggle to match todays Gaming PC's because of cost.
I think ray tracing will be the next big innovation, I've seen some ray tracing and it is true photorealism.
18T220 2 months ago 20
Comment removed
ziongite 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@18T220
Doubt it real time ray tracing is way off. Considering how long it takes to render a good caustics image or even a raytracing reflection or even raytraced shadows.
Remember Tessellation has barely been used at all. Look at the Heaven benchmark thats how much games need to be using it. Tessellation will replace most bump maps and games will look a lot better. They just need to use it more in game.
Also texture resolution needs to get bigger faster.
ziongite 2 months ago
@18T220 exactly. I mean with crysis 1, crytek basically said "Fuck it, we want to make the most amazing looking game ever, fuck consoles" And thats what they did. the next gen consoles....wont be able to run Crysis 1 on Cryengine 2 that is. With it on CE3 its like on medium, and can get 30 fps. Shit...my Superclocked 570 can get about 45fps at 1080p with no AA.
mrapter7 2 months ago
@18T220 When the next gen consols is rady to buy the computer is even 6 level over the next gen so if you want High end graphics go away from your consoles and go and get a nice pc
WorldismyOwn 2 months ago
@18T220 so what all the dam games will be limited based on what the consoles can do especially if Egay continues to own the Crysis IP...
lordmasterization 2 months ago
@18T220 What about the guys at "unlimited detail" with their algorithm for cloud point data graphics which allows for a huge amount of detail with a tiny amount of processing power!
JesusOfSuburbia98 2 months ago
@18T220 Its not a struggle >.> they just want to stick with motion control and try to make as much money as possible. If they wanted they could make a new cheap console, but sadly they care more about money then quality.
cleny217 1 month ago
@18T220
Microsoft and Sony actually lose money when first releasing their consoles because of the expensive hardware. They make money off the games. Just saying...
THuGZZTA 1 month ago
Comment removed
BeastlyRig 1 month ago
Comment removed
BeastlyRig 1 month ago
Comment removed
BeastlyRig 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@18T220 you really think devs will invest big money into pc games with ray tracing? 3.9 Million people pirated crysis 2! 3.4 Million pirated BF3! 4.5 Million pirated witcher 2.. out of them only the witcher 2 crossed 1 million sales!
Ray tracing won't come until consoles are ready for them.. PC players holds PC back shame.. :(
This is why crytek has stated they will never create another pc exclusive AAA game.. And rightfully so.. More cash in the console cow!
BeastlyRig 1 month ago
@18T220 which would make sense, since pc tech would make mainstream ray tracing in games possible sometime in 2014-2015! ... I just don't see it happen this year or the year after next.. the dam tech required for true ray tracing is too god dam expensive.. I doubt next gen consoles are going to have ray tracing though..
TheDragonrage25 1 month ago
@18T220 ray tracing??? thats new to me! what is it?
killjoyhog 1 month ago
@18T220 of course, if graffeno processors start to be selled by Intel, also we will see dynamical complex physics simulations.
luisfable 4 weeks ago
@classiccelebs Costs can be controlled by doing it in 2 parts and using an APU .. then a graphics update sold a few years later.
2015 first part(512-756 cores) 2019 second part(1536-2048 cores)
that beats quad SLI 580's by a lot.
NVIDIA is talking about games looking like this as you play them real time by 2019
watch?v=Wo6Q14vBB1c
CGI trailer level of graphics as you play.
PS4 could do that if it's sold in 2 parts.
abram730 1 month ago
Comment removed
BeastlyRig 1 month ago
@abram730 do you realize how expensive it will be to make games look like that?? Won't happen anytime soon especially on pc.. It will not make enough money in return as it's to easy to pirate..
BeastlyRig 1 month ago
@BeastlyRig It would happen in like 20 years. Like the change from DOOM 1 to Crysis. That's the change level expected. So, not really soon, but in like 10 or 20 years, it will be there.
CLICKMEYOULOSER 1 month ago
when the suit said max armor I almost got an orgasm.
tobrunive 2 months ago
jajajajjaja
mrlanisman 2 months ago
and that's how you play crysis 2...
heavenfalls013 2 months ago
Will my framerate drop by using the hd textures? if so about how much? I am getting 40 fps on high @ 720p, i don't want to lower any settings to accommodate the hd textures
1499Erick 2 months ago
I think you play with the graphics and not with enemies xD
joessmax 2 months ago
This game looks awesome! :D
haydenm15 2 months ago
The navy called, they want their simulator back! :D
1499Erick 2 months ago
It hurts my eyes to see a game that graphically stunning!
AkaMax007 2 months ago
Y Now try To play Minecraft On that Computer !
rollyray1252 2 months ago 20
@rollyray1252 He will not minecraft Because the more powerful computer :D you stupid American schoolboy!
TheFleePeru 2 months ago
@TheFleePeru thats the joke minecraft takes almost nothing to play and he has a good comp so the joke is can it run minecraft
slickswsone2 2 months ago
@rollyray1252 Dude Minecraft is actually takes a lot of performance to run smoothly
Lethalis1234 2 months ago
Comment removed
XxDemonlordxX 2 months ago
@Atzeone86
No I run Crysis 1 at 30fps with fraps, Crysis 2 is the most demanding game I own even BF3 on max runs better FPS.
18T220 2 months ago
@18T220 "Even" BF3 demands slightly less than Crysis 2. Crysis 1 is the most demanding game, but badly optimized. Crysis 2 came for consoles too so they had to drop down the system requirements for that.
JkNone 2 months ago
@JkNone No, Crysis 2 is more demanding than Crysis 1, after the dx 11 patch and high res textures release.
Tobiash87 2 months ago
@Tobiash87 Nope :/ sorry it aint, you should read some boards.
JkNone 2 months ago
@JkNone
He's correct, Crysis 2 is more demanding than Crysis 1 on MAX and Battlefield 3 on MAX. The only game I own that is more demanding than Crysis 2 DX11 is GTA IV on max settings with Enb series mod.
18T220 2 months ago
@18T220 Well IMO. How is it that the most used games for Benchmarking are Crysis and Battlefield 3? Crysis is still bragged to be the most demanding game all over the forums with battlefield 3 coming close.
JkNone 2 months ago
@JkNone
I dont read forums. I play the games on max settings and see how much FPS i get. Crysis 2 on DX9 runs very easy 60+ FPS but with the HD textures & DX11 patch it is about 8 FPS lower than Crysis DX10 and 12FPS lower than Battlefield 3 DX11 overall.
18T220 2 months ago
@18T220 >with the HD textures, there are HD textures for Crysis 1 aswell if you didnt know, that will dramaticly drop the fps. Without texture packs and shit, Crysis is more demanding. It is counted without addons.
JkNone 2 months ago
@JkNone
The Crysis 2 HD texture pack is official the Crysis HD textures are mods made by gamers.
Crysis 2 DX11 is more demanding mainly because of tessellation, do you own either game?
18T220 2 months ago
ein hoch auf tesslation
IHaveNotaName1 2 months ago
@IHaveNotaName1 huraa :D
555russe 2 months ago
Day 32, running low on food, still doesnt found SteveArgen2's comment.
Youpala01 2 months ago 84
@Youpala01 Click on Show All Comments, press Ctrl+F, type SteveArgen2 But his comment is already deleted.
pakan357 2 months ago
@Youpala01 erm, you could search for it using ctrl anf f, you do know that dont you LOL
SmibsProductions 2 months ago
@Youpala01 LOL YOU SIR MADE MY EVENING!
DarkYoshi9999vr 2 months ago
@Youpala01
i dont get it, explain ploz?
tulud 1 month ago
@Youpala01 Who's Comment?
LordDeathanize 1 month ago
@18T220 The conslows killed Crysis 2's graphics, it could've been so much more if it was a PC exclusive.
tazss159 2 months ago
@tazss159
direct x 11 + official hd textures?
derkevevin 2 months ago
@derkevevin Yeah, I know, but that hardly made any difference to the game, lol.
tazss159 2 months ago
@tazss159 the crysis 2 engine is a worse version of the original engine from part 1... do i have to say more :-(
Atzeone86 2 months ago
@Atzeone86 : Well it was designed for the console so yeah.
searcher619 2 months ago
am getting a 560 ti soon tho
eminemssxe 2 months ago
hey could the one i have do that
i5 2500k @ 4.6 ghz
4gb 1600 mhz corsair
1gb 6670
1 tb 7200 rpm hdd
eminemssxe 2 months ago
@eminemssxe yeah, it should do. Try it yourself.
omatomatom 2 months ago
@eminemssxe 6670? i kinda doubt that.
srsly buying a beast CPU and getting such a weak graphics card?
gabrocki 2 months ago
@eminemssxe NOOB THAT GPU SUCKS wait for the new nvidia cards to come out and get a GTX 660 TI
TheDrunkenKhajiit 2 months ago
@TheDrunkenKhajiit or just save his money and get SLI. only retards and pc bashers spend money like that for GPU. if he wants that GPU then let him you child.
GamerFreakzCOM 2 months ago
i see lag
raven33629 2 months ago
@raven33629 Lag?There is no fucking lag you fucking retarded un-educated shit.Lag is when you have a high amount of Ping while playing online that has to do with memory and internet connection and speed.He has only 20 FPS (frame rates per second)because he is recording with FRAPS which eats alot of memory.Educate yourself for god sake.
Thesniped13 2 months ago
a lot of memory, u mean u can record without losing fps if u have a lot of ram?
(i got 8gb ddr3 ram)
derkevevin 2 months ago
@SteveArgen2 lol, direct X is a microsoft product.
macattack1459 2 months ago
@SteveArgen2 I love PS3 but you are silly
bdlovednbWTfred 3 months ago
@SteveArgen2 no . IT's not true !
thekidracer 3 months ago
@thekidracer chupala
SteveArgen2 3 months ago
@SteveArgen2 watch?v=dhhJwGKV-yw
pol600ful 3 months ago
I was planning to try Crysis 2. I have Ati HD6450 and run Crysis with all settings on very high. Can I run Crysis 2? Wich is the hardest one to run?
27Markarian 3 months ago
@27Markarian
I still have problems comprehending the fact that your 6450 can max out Crysis when my 4870 cannot ..
Lakozte 3 months ago
@Lakozte I was able to run Crysis with all settings on high except shaders on medium with theAasus x 1600. It's not only a video card problem. You have to take care of your computer. What I mean is that I keep a lot of free space on the disk, I run defrag, I blocked all the unnecessary process, I modified the graphic of windows (it's heavy), and all of those things. If you do that, you will see a lot of difference.
27Markarian 3 months ago
@27Markarian
Alright, now I'm calling bullshit. You obviously have no experience whatsoever with computers if you claim you can even RUN Crysis on high with an ati x1600 man. That card struggles to compete with a nvidia 6600 GT.
Stop tellin us bullshit man. I don't fancy hating on you but I can see when someone is spewing out shit out of his mouth.
Also, reviews tell us that the 6450 pulls an "amazing" 9.7 fps in crysis with 4xaa, high on settings and an astonishing 1680x1050 resolution.
Lakozte 3 months ago
@Lakozte I'm a programmer. If you want go to my channel. You'll find a video of Far Cry 2, high-very high settings. O know how to take care of my computer. I also know how to program. I'm sending you a personal message, watch the video in the link, I recorded a little video of Far Cry 2, with almost all settings on max, and ati x 1600. I have things to attend, au revoir
27Markarian 3 months ago