Added: 6 months ago
From: 18T220
Views: 114,977
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (206)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @18T220 i run Crysis 2 on max And BF3 Minimum!! :((

  • @LasciLP

    Hows that, My PC runs BF3 on maxs better than Crysis 2 on max.

    What GPU do you have?

  • O.o? ??

  • Crysis still had better graphics. All they did was bump up the Ambient Occlusion and add a shit ton of Bump Maps everywhere in C2. I can still run C2 on Max settings but can only run Crysis on Medium.

  • @MrMcScabberz

    Wierd, I get lower FPS with Crysis 2 DX11 on max than I do with Crysis DX10 on max.

    Some how Crysis 2 DX11 on max settings for me is more demanding than Crysis DX10 and even BF3 DX11 max.

    You got an AMD or Nvidia GPU?

  • @18T220 techreport com/articles.x/21404

    Lower "object detail" one step and watch your FPS soar.

  • graphics was awesome but the game sucked.

  • Comment removed

  • if you can runcrsis 2 with extra not ultra. can you run BF3? I have an asus G60vx with a cooling mod

  • @EmPiREx220

    yes if you can run crysis 2 on medium you can run BF3 on medium.

  • @18T220 no its false

  • This isnt ULTRA graphics ITS HARDCORE!!!!

  • graphics wont look entirely better until the polygon count goes up anyway , it will always be polished shit until that happens

  • @Filmshite Polycount isn't everything. In fact, especially nowadays when we have excesses of 50,000 polygons on some models, plus the inclusion of bump-mapping, normal-mapping, and tessellation, graphics are more benefiting from advances in shaders and physics than anything. Just go on a game like Skyrim. The models in skyrim use the same amount of Polys across all fields of graphics quality. The differences in graphics come from shaders and textures, and the differences are night and day.

  • @kevlar60442

    Yea I agree but its like shaders and lighting have got to a level that it cant be impoved much more without future technology like real time ray tracing, so the devs at direct X just put alot of effot into tessellation and displacement mapping.

    There is a big difference in quality between a flat brick wall and a tessellated brick wall.

  • @kevlar60442 Very well put, i do agree, but i still think for any more progression a dramatic polygon count increase is nessecary , obviously included with advanded processing power. Frame rate and general physic's need improving also, i would love to see final fantasy Cgi cutscene's quality in a playable format that would just be awesome.

  • Technical Merit? Crysis 1 is the clear winner.

    Artistic Design? Crysis 2 takes the crown.

  • @kevlar60442 yeah, Crysis 2 had some beautiful sights, like when you get out of the building at the begining of the game, when you enter in New York in that same level, or near the end of the game when the park starts floating.

  • Man, there has GOT to be a better recording solution these days than Fraps. A lot of games allow demo recording via console commands or even an in-game menu option. Fraps just doesn't cut it.

  • I still prefer Crysis 1's graphics, they are better IMO, especially when the game is modded.

  • @drytaffin Eh, Crysis looked really plain to me. Sure, Crysis 1 had better textures, but they were buggy at times, and I loved the artistic design in Crysis 2, and they put a lot more detail into buildings and vehicles and whatnot. And the lighting was MUCH better in Crysis 2 IMO.

  • @drytaffin That's because Cry Engine 2 can achieve much more than the quality at Very High settings, is just they are locked so that people don't started raging (omg, this is imposible to run) and shit like that.

  • I truly love tessellation =D

  • Unreal Engine 3 looks so much better and doesn't need a powerful rig to run it.

  • For all those who say that some games have bad graphics. The developers can easyly make every game look just as good as crysis 2 if now much better the problem is how many ppl will be able to run them

  • you can do this with single HD6870? I will make magic in this game w/ my HD5770 CrossfireX :D

  • Dx 11 makes my Crysis 2 run a little laggy, but it looks waay better than dx9 if you know where to look at

  • can someone teach me how to properly shit my pants? cuz i splattered all over the place xP

  • Crysis 1 still has better physics.

    And larger environments, more freedom and much more inspiring environments.

    Fuck this Urban jungle shit, just look grey and dull when compared to a lush jungle!

  • @Jeroenneman wrong crysis 2 has better physics larger environments goes to crysis 1 (who cares?) do you even have the game? the story is set in a city. you can go download some forest maps.

  • the image in the thumb looks real life no doubt

  • Gotta love that tessellation.

  • @18T220 graphics mods

  • haha graphic could be better :D

  • next step is to get rid of polygons..

  • Crysis > Crysis 2

  • @InfanTerorizm heellll no

  • @dragonxanimation yes, it's a fact /watch?v=EcyOn5P7L0g Crysis2 console-game and thats why it has worse detail and destruction, smaller territory, etc.

  • @InfanTerorizm i meant graphics..... the engine is way better

  • @dragonxanimation i repeat - detail, destruction, territory, all this better in Crysis. And Crysis2 dont have mod like this

  • @InfanTerorizm this video looks better and all it is is hd textures.detail, destruction, territory depend on the game crysis 2 still has a better engine

  • @dragonxanimation no, this video looks worse and engine3 not better, it just for console too

  • @InfanTerorizm

    Cryengine 3 is better than Cryengine 2.

    Nothing beats Crysis 2 DX11 graphicaly.

  • @18T220 Crysis dx11 looks better than Crysis2 dx11. And has bigger territory, more destruction and detail. Thats what i call beats, bgg

    Cryengine 3 not better than Cryengine 2, it just work on few platforms

  • @InfanTerorizm

    Crysis has DX9 & DX10 not DX11.

    Shows how much you know.

  • @InfanTerorizm thats a mod...

  • @18T220 I fucked up my GTA with mods :(

  • @18T220 Not really. The graphics could possibly be better and most likley will be. The rage engine is for things like car damage etc, it only plays a tiny part in graphics.

  • @18T220 GTA 5 doesn't look as GTA 4 ! JESUS WATCH THE FUCKING TRAILER !

  • Image this graphic on GTA 5 ? OMG

  • wow, things got bumpy, thats huge deal right? I would rather just have actual exclusives to play than waste money to make things bumpy. And since next gen game systems will be out soon, What I have will keep me very happy till the next generation

  • @ubisoftac

    Wrong, Killzone 3 cant match these graphics. And you saying Crysis 2 looked better with DX9 is just plain retarded.

  • @18T220 actually killzone 3 really looks better... just look up the snow levels..

  • @Screep5 They don't look better, they are lubed with a shit load of motion blur and DoF.

  • @18T220 youre right

  • @18T220 killzone 3 can beat these graphics

  • @Megatronicful

    Do you want to explain to me why you said that? Facts.

  • @Megatronicful ehm not but ok crysis 1 and 2 can beat killzone btw

  • @18T220 why the hell you hate kz3 so much ? anyways both are great and kz3 is better than any halo shit bro !

  • @SWORDENxxxSPARDA

    I dont hate Killzone 3.

  • @ubisoftac LMFAO

  • @ubisoftac wft ?!, wait i mean -what the fuck-

  • @ubisoftac Are you retarded? Killzone 3!? Wow, you blind cunt. DX11 looks much better then DX9. You fail man. Did you play with low graphical settings?

  • @ubisoftac DX9 > DX11 haha are you stupid? you have a gamer PC, really? so if it is true I'm playing xbox720 now...

  • @ubisoftac i think, u have pentium 2

  • @ubisoftac Comparing PS3 to PC?

    Comparing DX9 10 DX11?

  • @ubisoftac  you ubersack

  • @ubisoftac 1. Killzone is only for ps3. I bet you liked dx9 more cause you didn't lagg as much than you did on dx11.

  • You can still see that the barrels are segmented. Wake me up when everything round is as it shoud be.

  • zaraz skad tam polskie drogi??

  • is this a free roam(sandbox) game??

  • @serkir121 you can get a physics sandbox for the game if you use a good gaming computer.

  • Sounds like Battlefield BC :D

  • @18T220

    very nice. i goot a GREAT price on min

  • What company made your HD 6870.

    i got a GIGABYTE 6870

  • I wonder what will the new halflife look like after the years of development

  • wow this makes bf3 look average..

  • wasser schafft keiner! keine richtigen einschusslöscher, voll unrealistisch etc. etc.

    GOD ftw! :)

  • Amazing! few questions what is ray tracing and tesselation?

  • @Youpala01

    i found it! :D

    press view all coments then CTRL+F type in SteveArgen2 and TADA! XD

  • Supposed use of tesselation: Easily bring a new not yet seen level of detail into game environment.

    Crysis-style use of tesselation: Crank up polycount on that cement slab so that game will require DX11 and latest hardware.

  • Crysis 2 on DX11 beats BF3

  • i honestly think that cryengine 2 is much better than cryengine 3 graphics wise. but thats just my opinion

  • @59Hellfire not really......cryengine 3 is as powerfull just that it has better HDR and and color grading and is a bit more flexible.....like those crysis mods that you see....it doesn't look better only because of a hell of a lot of optimisation in the textures and shaders. And whatever features that crysis 1 had is not in crysis 2...like.......trees

  • @topgear93 true

  • @topgear93 There are way better textures for some plants though and way more plants.

  • @18T220 Or Windows Vista

  • Comment removed

  • even if new consoles come out they will still kind of be out matched because on jan.9 7970 from amd shall be released and new cpus, has Ivy bridge come out yet?

  • @satyam171 Do you really need Windows7 for this Game ???

  • windows xp 32 bit

    2*3ghz

    geforce gts 450

    2 gb Ram

    will it run ???

  • games are getting shitty these days- no fun, but extra realistic graphics, ultra hdr and who knows what else. it should not even be called games, there is no game in it.

  • will have to wait until the next gen consoles come out and push the bar up....

  • @classiccelebs

    Next gen consoles will struggle to match todays Gaming PC's because of cost.

    I think ray tracing will be the next big innovation, I've seen some ray tracing and it is true photorealism.

  • Comment removed

  • @18T220 exactly. I mean with crysis 1, crytek basically said "Fuck it, we want to make the most amazing looking game ever, fuck consoles" And thats what they did. the next gen consoles....wont be able to run Crysis 1 on Cryengine 2 that is. With it on CE3 its like on medium, and can get 30 fps. Shit...my Superclocked 570 can get about 45fps at 1080p with no AA.

  • @18T220 When the next gen consols is rady to buy the computer is even 6 level over the next gen so if you want High end graphics go away from your consoles and go and get a nice pc

  • @18T220 so what all the dam games will be limited based on what the consoles can do especially if Egay continues to own the Crysis IP...

  • @18T220 What about the guys at "unlimited detail" with their algorithm for cloud point data graphics which allows for a huge amount of detail with a tiny amount of processing power!

  • @18T220 Its not a struggle >.> they just want to stick with motion control and try to make as much money as possible. If they wanted they could make a new cheap console, but sadly they care more about money then quality.

  • @18T220

    Microsoft and Sony actually lose money when first releasing their consoles because of the expensive hardware. They make money off the games. Just saying...

  • Comment removed

  • @18T220 which would make sense, since pc tech would make mainstream ray tracing in games possible sometime in 2014-2015! ... I just don't see it happen this year or the year after next.. the dam tech required for true ray tracing is too god dam expensive.. I doubt next gen consoles are going to have ray tracing though..

  • @18T220 ray tracing??? thats new to me! what is it?

  • @18T220 of course, if graffeno processors start to be selled by Intel, also we will see dynamical complex physics simulations.

  • @classiccelebs Costs can be controlled by doing it in 2 parts and using an APU .. then a graphics update sold a few years later.

    2015 first part(512-756 cores) 2019 second part(1536-2048 cores)

    that beats quad SLI 580's by a lot.

    NVIDIA is talking about games looking like this as you play them real time by 2019

    watch?v=Wo6Q14vBB1c

    CGI trailer level of graphics as you play.

    PS4 could do that if it's sold in 2 parts.

  • Comment removed

  • @abram730 do you realize how expensive it will be to make games look like that?? Won't happen anytime soon especially on pc.. It will not make enough money in return as it's to easy to pirate..

  • @BeastlyRig It would happen in like 20 years. Like the change from DOOM 1 to Crysis. That's the change level expected. So, not really soon, but in like 10 or 20 years, it will be there.

  • when the suit said max armor I almost got an orgasm.

  • jajajajjaja

    

  • and that's how you play crysis 2...

  • Will my framerate drop by using the hd textures? if so about how much? I am getting 40 fps on high @ 720p, i don't want to lower any settings to accommodate the hd textures

  • I think you play with the graphics and not with enemies xD

  • This game looks awesome! :D

  • The navy called, they want their simulator back! :D

  • It hurts my eyes to see a game that graphically stunning!

  • Y Now try To play Minecraft On that Computer !

  • @rollyray1252 He will not minecraft Because the more powerful computer :D you stupid American schoolboy!

  • @TheFleePeru thats the joke minecraft takes almost nothing to play and he has a good comp so the joke is can it run minecraft

  • @rollyray1252 Dude Minecraft is actually takes a lot of performance to run smoothly

  • Comment removed

  • @Atzeone86

    No I run Crysis 1 at 30fps with fraps, Crysis 2 is the most demanding game I own even BF3 on max runs better FPS.

  • @18T220 "Even" BF3 demands slightly less than Crysis 2. Crysis 1 is the most demanding game, but badly optimized. Crysis 2 came for consoles too so they had to drop down the system requirements for that.

  • @JkNone No, Crysis 2 is more demanding than Crysis 1, after the dx 11 patch and high res textures release.

  • @Tobiash87 Nope :/ sorry it aint, you should read some boards.

  • @JkNone

    He's correct, Crysis 2 is more demanding than Crysis 1 on MAX and Battlefield 3 on MAX. The only game I own that is more demanding than Crysis 2 DX11 is GTA IV on max settings with Enb series mod.

  • @18T220 Well IMO. How is it that the most used games for Benchmarking are Crysis and Battlefield 3? Crysis is still bragged to be the most demanding game all over the forums with battlefield 3 coming close.

  • @JkNone

    I dont read forums. I play the games on max settings and see how much FPS i get. Crysis 2 on DX9 runs very easy 60+ FPS but with the HD textures & DX11 patch it is about 8 FPS lower than Crysis DX10 and 12FPS lower than Battlefield 3 DX11 overall.

  • @18T220 >with the HD textures, there are HD textures for Crysis 1 aswell if you didnt know, that will dramaticly drop the fps. Without texture packs and shit, Crysis is more demanding. It is counted without addons.

  • @JkNone

    The Crysis 2 HD texture pack is official the Crysis HD textures are mods made by gamers.

    Crysis 2 DX11 is more demanding mainly because of tessellation, do you own either game?

  • ein hoch auf tesslation

  • @IHaveNotaName1 huraa :D

  • Day 32, running low on food, still doesnt found SteveArgen2's comment.

  • @Youpala01 Click on Show All Comments, press Ctrl+F, type SteveArgen2 But his comment is already deleted.

  • @Youpala01 erm, you could search for it using ctrl anf f, you do know that dont you LOL

  • @Youpala01  LOL YOU SIR MADE MY EVENING!

  • @Youpala01

    i dont get it, explain ploz?

  • @Youpala01 Who's Comment?

  • @18T220 The conslows killed Crysis 2's graphics, it could've been so much more if it was a PC exclusive.

  • @tazss159

    direct x 11 + official hd textures?

  • @derkevevin Yeah, I know, but that hardly made any difference to the game, lol.

  • @tazss159 the crysis 2 engine is a worse version of the original engine from part 1... do i have to say more :-(

  • @Atzeone86 :  Well it was designed for the console so yeah.

  • am getting a 560 ti soon tho

  • hey could the one i have do that

    i5 2500k @ 4.6 ghz

    4gb 1600 mhz corsair

    1gb 6670

    1 tb 7200 rpm hdd

  • @eminemssxe yeah, it should do. Try it yourself.

  • @eminemssxe 6670? i kinda doubt that.

    srsly buying a beast CPU and getting such a weak graphics card?

  • @eminemssxe NOOB THAT GPU SUCKS wait for the new nvidia cards to come out and get a GTX 660 TI

  • @TheDrunkenKhajiit or just save his money and get SLI. only retards and pc bashers spend money like that for GPU. if he wants that GPU then let him you child.

  • i see lag

  • @raven33629 Lag?There is no fucking lag you fucking retarded un-educated shit.Lag is when you have a high amount of Ping while playing online that has to do with memory and internet connection and speed.He has only 20 FPS (frame rates per second)because he is recording with FRAPS which eats alot of memory.Educate yourself for god sake.

  • a lot of memory, u mean u can record without losing fps if u have a lot of ram?

    (i got 8gb ddr3 ram)

  • @SteveArgen2 lol, direct X is a microsoft product.

  • @SteveArgen2 I love PS3 but you are silly

  • @SteveArgen2 no . IT's not true !

  • @thekidracer chupala

  • @SteveArgen2 watch?v=dhhJwGKV-yw

  • I was planning to try Crysis 2. I have Ati HD6450 and run Crysis with all settings on very high. Can I run Crysis 2? Wich is the hardest one to run?

  • @27Markarian

    I still have problems comprehending the fact that your 6450 can max out Crysis when my 4870 cannot ..

  • @Lakozte I was able to run Crysis with all settings on high except shaders on medium with theAasus x 1600. It's not only a video card problem. You have to take care of your computer. What I mean is that I keep a lot of free space on the disk, I run defrag, I blocked all the unnecessary process, I modified the graphic of windows (it's heavy), and all of those things. If you do that, you will see a lot of difference.

  • @27Markarian

    Alright, now I'm calling bullshit. You obviously have no experience whatsoever with computers if you claim you can even RUN Crysis on high with an ati x1600 man. That card struggles to compete with a nvidia 6600 GT.

    Stop tellin us bullshit man. I don't fancy hating on you but I can see when someone is spewing out shit out of his mouth.

    Also, reviews tell us that the 6450 pulls an "amazing" 9.7 fps in crysis with 4xaa, high on settings and an astonishing 1680x1050 resolution.

  • @Lakozte I'm a programmer. If you want go to my channel. You'll find a video of Far Cry 2, high-very high settings. O know how to take care of my computer. I also know how to program. I'm sending you a personal message, watch the video in the link, I recorded a little video of Far Cry 2, with almost all settings on max, and ati x 1600. I have things to attend, au revoir