BOTTOM LINE IT IS BETTER TO BE ARMED THEN NOT .AT LEAST WHEN YOU ARE ARMED YOU CAN DEFEND YOURSELF AND YOUR FAMILY.IF YOU ARE FOR GUN CONTROL CALL A COP,WAIT UNTIL HE OR SHE ARRIVES.USUALLY AT THAT TIME YOU ARE DEAD OR SERIOUSLY INJURED.A GUN IN HAND IS WORTH 10 COPS ON THE PHONE. SAD FOR THE GUN CONTROL PEOPLE BUT NEVER THE LESS TRUE.
kaikovich, you forget that in Japan (all firearms, period) and England (all handguns and all full auto,semi-auto and pump action rifles), they still have the same number of incidents of people being shot with firearms by criminals as before the ban (as in England's case) or despite a fantasized "cultural aversion" to firearms in Japans case. The Yakuzas and other criminals can, and do get guns if they want them. All the gun bans do is create target rich environments for the thug class.
Kaikovich, you probably did not grow up in a city with gun bans, or you would know that, law-abiding people, end up as hostages in their own communities. The criminals rule the streets. Life expectency goes down, and kids who are raised there, know fear, all too well! It taints the soul and saps the confidence out of you! I wish that democratic gun owners would stand up and be counted. Republicans are not the only ones who can't wait the 20-60 minutes it takes for the police to show up!
People don't relize this but it is NOT the police's duty to protect you. (even though their cars say protect & serve). US Supreme Court ruling, look it up. The cops have NO duty or responsibility & cannot be liable for failure to protect you..
The media also says that most police don't wish citizens to have guns. Well my wife & I both have our CCW permits (Tucson AZ) and EVERY officer I have ever talked to (& there have been many) support the fact we carry...to help protect ourselves & the community.
Why don't those folks who are against all guns and want this to be a gun free society, show they really mean it by erecting a sign at their home which says, "This home is a gun free one"? They will quickly learn at least two things. (1) That in such a society the ones who will continue to have guns will be the police and criminals. (2) That the police cannot be everywhere, nor will their response time to your call be quick enough to either save your life or protect your home.
@clustro Me too. I go to ASU and there isn't even the image of better security since Virginia Tech. I don't feel safe when I teach my morning class and never see any armed security and cops around. Its funny how they think I'm competent enough to get my PhD, but not trustworthy enough to carry a gun for self defense on campus.
I live in canada and handguns have very strict rules, along with everyother gun, which the federal government tries to make almost impossible to own. strict gun laws wont prevent criminals from obtaining guns, because they get them illegally anyway. it only prevents honest people from defending themeselves and their families.
A strongly anti-gun woman is about to get raped in an alley, but a heroic citizen steps in and holds a gun to the would-be rapist. Do you REALLY think the woman is going to say: "What the hell are you doing?! How dare you threaten this man with a bad evil gun! He's only going to violate me!" I mean, come on. Liberal gun-control idiots have no concept of self-defense until they're in trouble. They think that the world has no consequences for them.
Everyone ask yourself, who is responsible for "SELF" defense. Yeah thats right, police are according to those anti-gun people. I think it's up to ME to defend MYSELF.
EXACTLY!!!! When myself and my family are sitting at a stop light and get car jacked at gunpoint, i cant just reach into my pocket and pull out my personal police officer, i have to reach to my hip and pull out my XD 45
I am only a resident, not even a citizen.... yet I am about to get a 12 gauge mossberg. Why? No, not because I want to rob a bank. Not because I want to be a macho..... simply because I live in a middle/poor neighborhood AND law enforcement gets 30-50% budget cuts around here. Oh and on top of that, 25k criminals are about to be released from jails due to budget cuts. 2 years ago, I didn't even think of getting a gun.... Now the only person who can defend me is myself!
I know what you mean, in my old neighborhood it took the police to get there if shoot where fired, and if you where hit then you better drive them to the hospital becuase no one is coming.
Anybody who supports this; why don't you realize that the people going out robbing & killing others; those aren't legitimately purchased guns. So you remember that.
GO Wayne LaPierre! A+++ I am PRO-GUNS! A++++ I am PRO-GUN OWNERSHIP! I AM PRO-NRA! A+++++ ATTENTION CRIMINALS! YOU THREATEN MY LIFE AND I WILL SHOOT YOU FIRST AND ASK QUESTIONS LATER!
Its true, guns stop crime. I stayed at a friends house in denver, and someone tryed getting in the door and the little chain stopped the door from opening but the action cycling on the remington 870 stopped em from trying to undo the chain
There was also a shooting in a church stopped by a female security guard who happened to have her concealed weapons permit. She possibly saved hundreds of lives, but you'll never hear a gun-grabber talk about that, only about how guns are killing their children. I feel sorry for anybody that looses a loved one to violence of any means, I just don't see why only gun-violence seems to matter to these people, why don't they try to stop the massive gang violence, or the drug violence?
There was a school shooting stopped by an off duty cop who got his gun out of his car, which it was illegal for him to have in his car in the parking lot while off duty. There was a student that stopped one too but you never hear about any of those.
and yeah, the cops would like to be the only ones to have guns, then they wouldn't have to think twice about pulling someone over out of boredom or busting into the house without announcing themselves.
There was also a shooting in a church stopped by a female security guard who happened to have her concealed weapons permit. She possibly saved hundreds of lives, but you'll never hear a gun-grabber talk about that, only about how guns are killing their children. I feel sorry for anybody that looses a loved one to violence of any means, I just don't see why only gun-violence seems to matter to these people, why don't they try to stop the massive gang violence, or the drug violence?
even if you have a gun, the bad guys also have, so you can be killed anyway. In countries where guns are not legal, bad guys never carry guns, so it is harder for you to get killed, maybe it is easier for you to get stolen the mobile phone
kaikovich: You are a liar. Where guns are illegal, law-abiding citizens don't have guns only criminals have guns; minus the authorities. I suppose think the authorities are never corrupt or derelict or incompetent or just plain understaffed.
kaikovich: Maybe some countries that have gun bans have less crime. However many countries that have gun bans have more crime and much more violent crime. Let's take Mexico for instance, guns are essentially illegal, yet it is more dangerous than being in Iraq or Afghanistan. Gun and other type of violent crime is rampant in Mexico where guns are essentially banned.
@kaikovich you never know whats gonna go down and in some situations possession of a gun can mean the difference between life and death,not just for yourself but for innocent bystanders around you as well
kaikovich, as Schemefighter pointed out, just because guns are illegal, it does not mean the country you are in is safe. People often overlook the idea of the right to bear arms; it is in the bill of rights for a reason. Its secondary purpose is for self-defense for reason such as in this video--its primary purpose is your defense against the government. Often you hear about governments controlling their people, it is impossible to control Americans...we have a means of defense.
@kaikovich whether or not you have a gun is not going to control the fact that someone wants to kill you. if they want to kill you they aren't just going to say, oh no I don't have a gun. they'll stab you or find some horrible way of doing it and more crime is done trying to get guns illegally rather than regulate the registration of firearms.
@kaikovich Ok first of all, bad guys in countries where guns are not legal have the same amount of guns as they do i countries where guns are legal. since when did a law keep a criminal from doing something? that is why they are criminals. becasue they break the law! you must think that a criminal says oh its illegal to carry a gun and rob a bank so im not going to. thats crazy!
@kaikovich Gun crimes are at an all time high in both England and Australia... they both have strict bans on firearms.. Japan has very high gun crime, firearms are completely illegal in private hands.. Lowest gun crime rate in the world... Switzerland.. where every man of military age is required by law to have a state issued assault rifle, and women are encouraged to but not required to also.
@kaikovich False, still a lot of guns in the uk even though they're mostly banned. Only now the cops need guns over there, they didn't use to when the citizens had guns. If I'm going to get shot I like to think I can at least shoot back.
@kaikovich you have obviously never had someone break into your house and try to beat you to death with a wooden bat. I have personally been hit with an aluminum bat and I can tell you that its no joke and can easily do just as much damage as a gun. Now just imagine that guy with a bat and about 4 more guys breaking in to rob you using only pipes and sticks and crowbars because they know that you dont have a gun to stop them with. now what do you do? wrestle 5 armed men out of your house?
@kaikovich you have obviously never had someone break into your house and try to beat you to death with a wooden bat. I have personally been hit with an aluminum bat and I can tell you that its no joke and can easily do just as much damage as a gun. Now just imagine that guy with a bat and about 4 more guys breaking in to rob you using only pipes and sticks and crowbars because they know that you dont have a gun to stop them with. now what do you do? wrestle 5 armed men out of your house?
Cops arrive AFTER the fact. Not gonna help while you're being killed. Defense is needed and all this Democratic gun control crap makes crimes go up. Take away guns from everyone, and the criminals find ways to get guns illegally and guess what, then? FREE TARGETS! No self protection!
My questiuon is this why don't they give the cops better guns....Hello we've had this problem since the mobsters in the 30 had tommy guns. HELLO wake up America.
The fact is the police are not liable for your death or dismemberment then why would they tell you not to defend yourself? Warren Vs. District of Columbia proves they are not responsible so give us our rights. If my phones are down stairs and my gun is in 5 feet away, I'm not dialing 911 I'm firing 9mm. Enjoy!
if an idividual doesn't want to own a gun, then thats their right. but don't tell me i can't own one. it's my right to protect myself and my family. if people want to rely on someone else to protect them, then those people will more than likely get killed or assaulted.
Everyone, Please observe "Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act" 2-16-9
It is one step of removing all guns from civilian hands. The big clause is that the federal government stipulates:That You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing!! Under their choice of doctors.
In other words, if they don't like you, they can remove your right to own guns by a rubber stamp.
It is a miracle that the SCOTUS ruled the 2nd Amendment as an individual right. Now if we could only establish licensed CCW as a federal right instead of having to look to the state level.
yes i agree, we had a 2nd ammendment equivelent but then the asshole (pierre trudoe) made the new constitution/charter rights that now say we can't shoot a dude until were hurt first, adn we have to go to court over it, and how its so hard to get automatics, silencers, and other items. Damn fucking liberals
"Only a coward supports gun control. You know how to stop carjacking? Shoot the carjacker. If someone is going to kill me for my Buick, I'm gonna shoot until I'm out of ammo - and then I'll call 911."
-Ted Nugent, People Magazine, quoted in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, January 5, 1994
I'm a strong 2nd amendment supporter but their Math? 2.5 million self defense incidents with guns per year divided by 365 days = 6,849 incidents per day, 137 incidents per day per state. To me this seems very high.
it does seem high. but living in some rough neighborhoods i can understand this number especially in large cities. now i live in a nice area and i understand why people would think that was a high number
It's amazing, isn't it? The study that showed this number was conducted by the Department of Justice. A lot of gun control activists think only the military and police should have guns. If they trust the government so much, then they clearly trust the DOJ.
The FBI has actually backed those figures. This includes crimes where it was likely that a crime was going to be committed but wasn't attempted (prowlers) That's slightly less than 1 out of 100 people each year preventing a crime with their gun. In the part of Texas I grew up in the number seems low...LOL
self defence doesn't mean they discharged the weapon, merely brandishing the weapon is classified as self defence. in that instance the gun is stopping the crime before it starts, so many people don't even reported for that reason.
No, what seems high is the fact that 325 people were killed in Chicago in one year. That's almost one per day in a city with horrificly strict gun laws. Does 2.5m seem high when more crimes are comitted in general than murders specifically? A gun can prevent theft, rape, or assault, not just murder. And, the FBI has backed that figure. I have known several people who prevented crime with a gun. I don't know anyone that was murdered with a gun. It is good to question the statistics though.
I had an exp. baton in my car & a CHP officer said if I had my hand on it when he walked up to my car he would have shot me. He said there's no situation where it would be necessary for me to have one. I told him I had it for protection, he asked "protection from what?" I stared back at him blankly in astonishment. I asked what was I to do if someone wanted to beat & rob me, he said "run away." That doesn't always work, friend. He said I should "call the police. YEAH! After I'm in the hospital!
if the state comes for the guns, they will have to meet mine and the neighbors guns and ammo. also, the police are screwed if they take our guns. in north holywood bank robbery, the police had to use guns from a gunstore because their guns were underpowered
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal was recently honored at the 2008 NRA convention for legislation designed to prevent future gun confiscations similar to those in post-Katrina New Orleans.
It's called the "Disaster Recovery Protection Act" and is now law.
i wanna shoot skeet with glenn and ted nugent so bad.
mcneelyalex 1 year ago 7
@mcneelyalex
Yes; I would love to go shooting with them; then go out for dinner, and conversations and debates with.
Schemefighter 1 year ago 9
I would rather have a gun and not need, then need it and NOT have it. Go 2nd Amendment!!!! I carry concealed everyday.
NoMAIG 1 year ago 20
BOTTOM LINE IT IS BETTER TO BE ARMED THEN NOT .AT LEAST WHEN YOU ARE ARMED YOU CAN DEFEND YOURSELF AND YOUR FAMILY.IF YOU ARE FOR GUN CONTROL CALL A COP,WAIT UNTIL HE OR SHE ARRIVES.USUALLY AT THAT TIME YOU ARE DEAD OR SERIOUSLY INJURED.A GUN IN HAND IS WORTH 10 COPS ON THE PHONE. SAD FOR THE GUN CONTROL PEOPLE BUT NEVER THE LESS TRUE.
dannyfivefifty 1 year ago 7
kaikovich, you forget that in Japan (all firearms, period) and England (all handguns and all full auto,semi-auto and pump action rifles), they still have the same number of incidents of people being shot with firearms by criminals as before the ban (as in England's case) or despite a fantasized "cultural aversion" to firearms in Japans case. The Yakuzas and other criminals can, and do get guns if they want them. All the gun bans do is create target rich environments for the thug class.
CrystalMethodologist 1 year ago 3
im all for guns and am a permit holder myself but really its not going to solve everything.
chazeman2 1 year ago
Kaikovich, you probably did not grow up in a city with gun bans, or you would know that, law-abiding people, end up as hostages in their own communities. The criminals rule the streets. Life expectency goes down, and kids who are raised there, know fear, all too well! It taints the soul and saps the confidence out of you! I wish that democratic gun owners would stand up and be counted. Republicans are not the only ones who can't wait the 20-60 minutes it takes for the police to show up!
johnj7592 1 year ago 2
1. LOGIC! Criminals will ignore laws.... duh
2. Gun ctrl is just another "law" to them.
3. Gun ctrl gives criminals (who ignore laws anyway) power over those who obey bullshit laws.
4. If Law abiding citizens have guns, then every criminal will KNOW that EVERYBODY has a gun, hence a lower incidence of gun crime.
Riddle me that!
billybbob18 1 year ago 6
pt 2/2
People don't relize this but it is NOT the police's duty to protect you. (even though their cars say protect & serve). US Supreme Court ruling, look it up. The cops have NO duty or responsibility & cannot be liable for failure to protect you..
PathinAZ 1 year ago 3
pt 1/2
The media also says that most police don't wish citizens to have guns. Well my wife & I both have our CCW permits (Tucson AZ) and EVERY officer I have ever talked to (& there have been many) support the fact we carry...to help protect ourselves & the community.
PathinAZ 1 year ago
Why don't those folks who are against all guns and want this to be a gun free society, show they really mean it by erecting a sign at their home which says, "This home is a gun free one"? They will quickly learn at least two things. (1) That in such a society the ones who will continue to have guns will be the police and criminals. (2) That the police cannot be everywhere, nor will their response time to your call be quick enough to either save your life or protect your home.
Hawkeye1936 1 year ago 3
if it wasn't for the fact that my university is run by fascist pigs, i would be carrying on campus.
clustro 1 year ago
@clustro Me too. I go to ASU and there isn't even the image of better security since Virginia Tech. I don't feel safe when I teach my morning class and never see any armed security and cops around. Its funny how they think I'm competent enough to get my PhD, but not trustworthy enough to carry a gun for self defense on campus.
jkmcdani 1 year ago
I live in canada and handguns have very strict rules, along with everyother gun, which the federal government tries to make almost impossible to own. strict gun laws wont prevent criminals from obtaining guns, because they get them illegally anyway. it only prevents honest people from defending themeselves and their families.
750BruteForce4x4i 1 year ago 4
A strongly anti-gun woman is about to get raped in an alley, but a heroic citizen steps in and holds a gun to the would-be rapist. Do you REALLY think the woman is going to say: "What the hell are you doing?! How dare you threaten this man with a bad evil gun! He's only going to violate me!" I mean, come on. Liberal gun-control idiots have no concept of self-defense until they're in trouble. They think that the world has no consequences for them.
VolParagom 2 years ago 7
Everyone ask yourself, who is responsible for "SELF" defense. Yeah thats right, police are according to those anti-gun people. I think it's up to ME to defend MYSELF.
DaWok370 2 years ago 6
EXACTLY!!!! When myself and my family are sitting at a stop light and get car jacked at gunpoint, i cant just reach into my pocket and pull out my personal police officer, i have to reach to my hip and pull out my XD 45
mrh20082008 1 year ago
Pacifists are Protected by Gun Bearers.
jebillings 2 years ago 7
I am only a resident, not even a citizen.... yet I am about to get a 12 gauge mossberg. Why? No, not because I want to rob a bank. Not because I want to be a macho..... simply because I live in a middle/poor neighborhood AND law enforcement gets 30-50% budget cuts around here. Oh and on top of that, 25k criminals are about to be released from jails due to budget cuts. 2 years ago, I didn't even think of getting a gun.... Now the only person who can defend me is myself!
tsxws 2 years ago 10
I know what you mean, in my old neighborhood it took the police to get there if shoot where fired, and if you where hit then you better drive them to the hospital becuase no one is coming.
mosniper831 2 years ago
i agree with this.... i am pro gun
killfourme 2 years ago 6
Yes. ProGun, Nobama.
Anybody who supports this; why don't you realize that the people going out robbing & killing others; those aren't legitimately purchased guns. So you remember that.
AnfangerBenutzer 2 years ago 7
GO Wayne LaPierre! A+++ I am PRO-GUNS! A++++ I am PRO-GUN OWNERSHIP! I AM PRO-NRA! A+++++ ATTENTION CRIMINALS! YOU THREATEN MY LIFE AND I WILL SHOOT YOU FIRST AND ASK QUESTIONS LATER!
NOBULLSPIN 2 years ago 5
guns don,t commit crimes people do, punish the criminals not the guns.
rancantrell 2 years ago 7
Good go get them Glenn. Glenn Beck Rules.
SOILLINBIGCOUNTRY01 2 years ago 6
life and liberty, both are way too important to let some worthless idiot try to take them away. ill keep my guns and protect my family
cardsnchipsplz 2 years ago 3
Guns kill people like SPOONS made Rosie O'Donnell FAT!
rifleman522 2 years ago 7
An armed citizen is free, an un armed citizen is a slave.
brainerdrebel 2 years ago 2
Its true, guns stop crime. I stayed at a friends house in denver, and someone tryed getting in the door and the little chain stopped the door from opening but the action cycling on the remington 870 stopped em from trying to undo the chain
wedvarn 2 years ago
There was also a shooting in a church stopped by a female security guard who happened to have her concealed weapons permit. She possibly saved hundreds of lives, but you'll never hear a gun-grabber talk about that, only about how guns are killing their children. I feel sorry for anybody that looses a loved one to violence of any means, I just don't see why only gun-violence seems to matter to these people, why don't they try to stop the massive gang violence, or the drug violence?
jubeigh13 2 years ago 16
There was a school shooting stopped by an off duty cop who got his gun out of his car, which it was illegal for him to have in his car in the parking lot while off duty. There was a student that stopped one too but you never hear about any of those.
and yeah, the cops would like to be the only ones to have guns, then they wouldn't have to think twice about pulling someone over out of boredom or busting into the house without announcing themselves.
Guns Don't Kill People, Philadelphia Does!
EuphemiseThis 2 years ago 7
There was also a shooting in a church stopped by a female security guard who happened to have her concealed weapons permit. She possibly saved hundreds of lives, but you'll never hear a gun-grabber talk about that, only about how guns are killing their children. I feel sorry for anybody that looses a loved one to violence of any means, I just don't see why only gun-violence seems to matter to these people, why don't they try to stop the massive gang violence, or the drug violence?
jubeigh13 2 years ago
WHY WHY WHY do liberals just lie over and over again. TELL THE TRUTH !!!
nitto35s 2 years ago 6
Yep, liberals love to lie to the public!
They say gun control saves lives but it hasn't done shit in California!
Gun ownership makes more sense!
Plain & Simple truth!
jlac2xmglock 2 years ago 12
im from philly he is not lying trust i ccp
phillyforever 2 years ago
even if you have a gun, the bad guys also have, so you can be killed anyway. In countries where guns are not legal, bad guys never carry guns, so it is harder for you to get killed, maybe it is easier for you to get stolen the mobile phone
kaikovich 2 years ago
kaikovich: You are a liar. Where guns are illegal, law-abiding citizens don't have guns only criminals have guns; minus the authorities. I suppose think the authorities are never corrupt or derelict or incompetent or just plain understaffed.
Schemefighter 2 years ago 31
@Schemefighter absoultely right,criminals ALWAYS carry guns and are more likely to commit a crime if they feel their victim is unarmed
serioushamster 1 year ago
kaikovich: Maybe some countries that have gun bans have less crime. However many countries that have gun bans have more crime and much more violent crime. Let's take Mexico for instance, guns are essentially illegal, yet it is more dangerous than being in Iraq or Afghanistan. Gun and other type of violent crime is rampant in Mexico where guns are essentially banned.
Schemefighter 2 years ago 29
@kaikovich you never know whats gonna go down and in some situations possession of a gun can mean the difference between life and death,not just for yourself but for innocent bystanders around you as well
serioushamster 1 year ago
@kaikovich I live in Brazil. I can't have a gun but criminals have them.
WackoRhailent 1 year ago 3
kaikovich, as Schemefighter pointed out, just because guns are illegal, it does not mean the country you are in is safe. People often overlook the idea of the right to bear arms; it is in the bill of rights for a reason. Its secondary purpose is for self-defense for reason such as in this video--its primary purpose is your defense against the government. Often you hear about governments controlling their people, it is impossible to control Americans...we have a means of defense.
Treyzorz 1 year ago
@kaikovich whether or not you have a gun is not going to control the fact that someone wants to kill you. if they want to kill you they aren't just going to say, oh no I don't have a gun. they'll stab you or find some horrible way of doing it and more crime is done trying to get guns illegally rather than regulate the registration of firearms.
hockeyyismylife 1 year ago
@kaikovich Ok first of all, bad guys in countries where guns are not legal have the same amount of guns as they do i countries where guns are legal. since when did a law keep a criminal from doing something? that is why they are criminals. becasue they break the law! you must think that a criminal says oh its illegal to carry a gun and rob a bank so im not going to. thats crazy!
jerelesli 1 year ago 2
@kaikovich Gun crimes are at an all time high in both England and Australia... they both have strict bans on firearms.. Japan has very high gun crime, firearms are completely illegal in private hands.. Lowest gun crime rate in the world... Switzerland.. where every man of military age is required by law to have a state issued assault rifle, and women are encouraged to but not required to also.
MarineWMU911 1 year ago 4
@kaikovich False, still a lot of guns in the uk even though they're mostly banned. Only now the cops need guns over there, they didn't use to when the citizens had guns. If I'm going to get shot I like to think I can at least shoot back.
BHarris25 1 year ago 4
@kaikovich you have obviously never had someone break into your house and try to beat you to death with a wooden bat. I have personally been hit with an aluminum bat and I can tell you that its no joke and can easily do just as much damage as a gun. Now just imagine that guy with a bat and about 4 more guys breaking in to rob you using only pipes and sticks and crowbars because they know that you dont have a gun to stop them with. now what do you do? wrestle 5 armed men out of your house?
s197stangdragger 1 year ago
@kaikovich you have obviously never had someone break into your house and try to beat you to death with a wooden bat. I have personally been hit with an aluminum bat and I can tell you that its no joke and can easily do just as much damage as a gun. Now just imagine that guy with a bat and about 4 more guys breaking in to rob you using only pipes and sticks and crowbars because they know that you dont have a gun to stop them with. now what do you do? wrestle 5 armed men out of your house?
s197stangdragger 1 year ago 9
@kaikovich You should not be taken seriously.
tiecuando 1 year ago
@kaikovich "In countries where guns are not legal, BAD GUYS NEVER CARRY GUNS" Are you sure about that? I believe you may be mistaken my friend.
nephilium67 1 year ago 16
We need more stories like this one. I just went to Walmart and they were sold out of ammo completely except for a few boxes of 12 guage.
amiscavage 2 years ago 2
personally, i'd rather get fired for having a gun in my trunk and using it than getting killed for pizza
usernamepasscode 2 years ago
Cops arrive AFTER the fact. Not gonna help while you're being killed. Defense is needed and all this Democratic gun control crap makes crimes go up. Take away guns from everyone, and the criminals find ways to get guns illegally and guess what, then? FREE TARGETS! No self protection!
darkpunk012 2 years ago 2
From my cold dead hands!
stonecast 2 years ago 2
My questiuon is this why don't they give the cops better guns....Hello we've had this problem since the mobsters in the 30 had tommy guns. HELLO wake up America.
jsh78mang 2 years ago
The fact is the police are not liable for your death or dismemberment then why would they tell you not to defend yourself? Warren Vs. District of Columbia proves they are not responsible so give us our rights. If my phones are down stairs and my gun is in 5 feet away, I'm not dialing 911 I'm firing 9mm. Enjoy!
jsh78mang 2 years ago 2
Even if all guns are banned. The criminals will find a way to get the guns no matter what. That would lead to more innocent deaths.
CipherADF01 2 years ago
if an idividual doesn't want to own a gun, then thats their right. but don't tell me i can't own one. it's my right to protect myself and my family. if people want to rely on someone else to protect them, then those people will more than likely get killed or assaulted.
mdjbm 2 years ago
definatly agree. Maryland is facist about our guns. I break the law so I am able to uphold it.
TheLostPeople 2 years ago
Everyone, Please observe "Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act" 2-16-9
It is one step of removing all guns from civilian hands. The big clause is that the federal government stipulates:That You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing!! Under their choice of doctors.
In other words, if they don't like you, they can remove your right to own guns by a rubber stamp.
eklypse0 2 years ago
Power to you Ted!!!
kimcliftrn 3 years ago
It is a miracle that the SCOTUS ruled the 2nd Amendment as an individual right. Now if we could only establish licensed CCW as a federal right instead of having to look to the state level.
zcm007attack 3 years ago
Bring the CCW to Canada. We as human beings have the right to defend ourselfs and our familys.
Justins1877 3 years ago 51
yes i agree, we had a 2nd ammendment equivelent but then the asshole (pierre trudoe) made the new constitution/charter rights that now say we can't shoot a dude until were hurt first, adn we have to go to court over it, and how its so hard to get automatics, silencers, and other items. Damn fucking liberals
therealsporadicaarmy 3 years ago 2
"Only a coward supports gun control. You know how to stop carjacking? Shoot the carjacker. If someone is going to kill me for my Buick, I'm gonna shoot until I'm out of ammo - and then I'll call 911."
-Ted Nugent, People Magazine, quoted in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, January 5, 1994
zack9912000 3 years ago 28
I agree, how we are not allowed handguns in Canada, every time on the news you hear about criminals using handguns. Also, you have a Buick? Nice.
Kneecap22 2 years ago
I'm a strong 2nd amendment supporter but their Math? 2.5 million self defense incidents with guns per year divided by 365 days = 6,849 incidents per day, 137 incidents per day per state. To me this seems very high.
gsuitter 3 years ago
it does seem high. but living in some rough neighborhoods i can understand this number especially in large cities. now i live in a nice area and i understand why people would think that was a high number
whatitischief 2 years ago
many go unreported, as many times simply seeing the weapon is enough to stop the agressor..
gilraine1225 2 years ago
Now add the fact that there are somewhere around 301 million people in the US. and that is only the registered ones.
jsh78mang 2 years ago
It's amazing, isn't it? The study that showed this number was conducted by the Department of Justice. A lot of gun control activists think only the military and police should have guns. If they trust the government so much, then they clearly trust the DOJ.
robfplusp 2 years ago
It is not high look at the number of people getting mugged without a gun!
noluck33 2 years ago
@gsuitter (yes its late i know) I think they`re counting the simple brandishing of a gun as self-defense which is valid.
emmanuelnimmons 2 years ago
The FBI has actually backed those figures. This includes crimes where it was likely that a crime was going to be committed but wasn't attempted (prowlers) That's slightly less than 1 out of 100 people each year preventing a crime with their gun. In the part of Texas I grew up in the number seems low...LOL
guamsst 2 years ago
self defence doesn't mean they discharged the weapon, merely brandishing the weapon is classified as self defence. in that instance the gun is stopping the crime before it starts, so many people don't even reported for that reason.
my .02 anyway.
rommelAOE 2 years ago 6
No, what seems high is the fact that 325 people were killed in Chicago in one year. That's almost one per day in a city with horrificly strict gun laws. Does 2.5m seem high when more crimes are comitted in general than murders specifically? A gun can prevent theft, rape, or assault, not just murder. And, the FBI has backed that figure. I have known several people who prevented crime with a gun. I don't know anyone that was murdered with a gun. It is good to question the statistics though.
guamsst 2 years ago 4
Well most of the time it's without a shot even being fired. Just one being seen is enough of a deterent
azzh00le 2 years ago 3
I had an exp. baton in my car & a CHP officer said if I had my hand on it when he walked up to my car he would have shot me. He said there's no situation where it would be necessary for me to have one. I told him I had it for protection, he asked "protection from what?" I stared back at him blankly in astonishment. I asked what was I to do if someone wanted to beat & rob me, he said "run away." That doesn't always work, friend. He said I should "call the police. YEAH! After I'm in the hospital!
NoGuff 3 years ago 10
Key words to carrying a weopon for protection are "life" and "property"! Next time a cop asks you a question like that, just say those key words!
jonathanstile 2 years ago 4
if the state comes for the guns, they will have to meet mine and the neighbors guns and ammo. also, the police are screwed if they take our guns. in north holywood bank robbery, the police had to use guns from a gunstore because their guns were underpowered
M16AR15dude 3 years ago 10
If the state ever comes for my guns, I'll give em the ammo first.
USA04July1776 3 years ago 16
Did you see what they did in New Orleans after Katrina? Unbelievable.
NoGuff 3 years ago 13
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal was recently honored at the 2008 NRA convention for legislation designed to prevent future gun confiscations similar to those in post-Katrina New Orleans.
It's called the "Disaster Recovery Protection Act" and is now law.
Bobby Jindal for VP.
watch?v=pqulJSzEPqM
ClassicFIHD 3 years ago
Get at least a couple unregistered guns, man. Never know when something like that will happen. "Putting the constitution on hold" and all that BS.
JustOneGunner 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I agree!
rhv201 2 years ago
Guns don't cause violence, ignorance does.
Scorpion4646 3 years ago 53
Yes! Remember Guns Do not Kill!!! People Kill!!!!
noluck33 2 years ago
How about, "Guns don't cause violence, gun control does!" ?
rhv201 2 years ago
911 really proved its worth in this instance.
steve0281 3 years ago 8
Calling 911 is supplementary, at best. In the end, we are each responsible for ourselves. When seconds count, cops are only minutes away.
ResponsibleGunOwner 3 years ago 13