Added: 3 years ago
From: franklinthu
Views: 1,993
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • I find what your doing very interesting, but for the two data points that you put on the end it is irrelevant because with connecting those two points with average rates of change. The only way to make sure its still linear would be to add more points and see that the general trend is linear, not just two points that happen to match the slope of your linear constant.

    Very interesting experiment though.

  • Forget the legos, only look at the ball attracted to the magnet - very different from a string. I measured the rpm by recording the experiment on a video camera at 30 frames/second. I find the rotation where the ball separates from the magnet, then I count the number of frames it takes for it to rotate once after that by stepping frame by frame. This gives me the time in seconds it takes to rotate once and I can calculate RPM from that. Based on RPM and R I can calculate velocity.

  • Okay, I'll help you figure this out.Say the centre distance between the magnet and the ball is r, the angular velocity w, mass of the ball m, the centripetal force between them is mrw^2. The ball pulls apart at a constant force, which requires constant angular velocity since the separation between ball and magnet is the same. Now, a constant angular velocity means velocity is proportional to the radius.

  • Yes I understood why you are using a magnet.. it takes roughly a constant force to break free so avoiding having to measure the force... but to me leggo looks very much like string.

    Anyway that aside..how are you measuring velocity/rpm?

  • Unfortunately your experiment appears to measure the "contact centripedal

    force" NOT the "non-contact centripedal force" (your definitions). This is

    because you vary the length of the spinning lego arm NOT the distance

    between ball and magnet.

  • Yes, this is very confusing on how to measure the force/distance relationship. The key is that instead of measuring a variable force by changing the velocity (ball on string method), I keep the force constant with the magnet and steel ball and vary the centripedal force applied to break the magnet and steel ball apart. Don't get your axle wrapped around the non-contact part, it is just another method of measuring the force/distance relationship.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more