I don't trust these pajamas media guys! They pretend to be conservatives, yet offer nothing but ridicule for real conservative Ron Paul supporters by calling us nuts and "Paulbots." Yet I'm sure they'd be upset if someone called them "Israelbots!"
Ok, do you want to know why Ron Paul exists as a viable candidate? Two reasons: 9/11 conspiracy theorists and anti-Semites. Plain and simple. That's the mother lode right there. Just tap into the vast stupidity, and you'll get plenty of checks from a slew of nutjobs aka Paulbots.
CNN selected and choose questions from you tube. True questions never got through the filter process. Problem with candidates they don't like to be put on the spot where their creditability is challenged.
Youtube debate is a real joke. All youtube debaters were democart supporters
In fairness, I know one that wasn't, ConsevativeVoiceUSA, as best I know. Still, many were democrat activists and advisors along with libertarians rather than republicans for who the primaries were created.
If you're talking about H.R. 4192, the answer OUGHT to be, not just "No", but "No, by GOD!"
First of all, IF there's such a thing as the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and IF that Amendment grants citizenship to ANYONE born in this country, Section 201 of H.R. 4192 violates that Amendment. But that's not the only reason that H.R. 4192 ought never to become law.
I don't want another candidate to win, I want Tancredo for president. So far, hes the most courageous & realistic, the most assertive & the most vocal presidential candidate to address illegal aliens, terrorists & drug smugglers crossing our borders. IF the other candidates are as realistic & frank - they'd say yes. Guess we'll have to wait & see.
Yes, this must be asked, and answered. No obey law, no funds- makes perfect sense. Punish the enablers, demagnitize the attraction to come here along with enforcement. It breeds contempt and disrespect for all laws if these do not get obeyed and go without punishment- anarchy and chaos ensue- down the tubes go our culture and civilization. Thanks liberals.
Hmmm.. not a bad question. However will it be considered unfair (if that's the word)since it basically calls the other candidates to give a straight up or down on another candidate's proposal.
representativepress, the Dems aren't asked this (exact) question because we know they'd NEVER give a straight answer. That's not saying the GOP candidates will either, but it's a big issue with primary voters. BTW, Hillary is big on promising voting rights and legal status to illegals, so whether she answers or not, we already know her position (we have to follow her actions, because her flip-flopping answers make John Kerry look like a straight shooter).
I don't trust these pajamas media guys! They pretend to be conservatives, yet offer nothing but ridicule for real conservative Ron Paul supporters by calling us nuts and "Paulbots." Yet I'm sure they'd be upset if someone called them "Israelbots!"
Craigbe 4 years ago
Ha ha! FUNNY! Better be careful there C. It's OK to call others "paulbots", but it's not OK to mention the neo........
GAULTED 4 years ago
Ok, do you want to know why Ron Paul exists as a viable candidate? Two reasons: 9/11 conspiracy theorists and anti-Semites. Plain and simple. That's the mother lode right there. Just tap into the vast stupidity, and you'll get plenty of checks from a slew of nutjobs aka Paulbots.
RenShiWu 4 years ago 4
CNN selected and choose questions from you tube. True questions never got through the filter process. Problem with candidates they don't like to be put on the spot where their creditability is challenged.
Youtube debate is a real joke. All youtube debaters were democart supporters
suria49 4 years ago 5
In fairness, I know one that wasn't, ConsevativeVoiceUSA, as best I know. Still, many were democrat activists and advisors along with libertarians rather than republicans for who the primaries were created.
PhantomRazor 4 years ago
If you're talking about H.R. 4192, the answer OUGHT to be, not just "No", but "No, by GOD!"
First of all, IF there's such a thing as the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and IF that Amendment grants citizenship to ANYONE born in this country, Section 201 of H.R. 4192 violates that Amendment. But that's not the only reason that H.R. 4192 ought never to become law.
hechizorro 4 years ago
This needs to be asked of all the candidates, thanks for the post!
lookhearsee 4 years ago
Ron Paul for President!
saadasim 4 years ago
Second.
ConstantlyQuestion 4 years ago
Great question, it may be a little to direct for SOME candidates, lol.
TruthTaste 4 years ago 5
I'd love to see Hillary's answer to that question. but I doubt I would understand it.
kchandler2 4 years ago 4
The only logical answer would be yes.
TheKillerZombie 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WE THE PEOPLE, DEMAND IMPEACHMENT BACK on the TABLE, ANY TABLE, but "BRING IT
ON"
Impeach the God Dammed CRIMINALS!!!
STOP FUNDING the IRAQ DISASTER!!!
Enough with "Stay the Course"...enough with "New DIRECTION". Just STOP funding this
nonsense and GOD DAMMIT, just DO IT!!!
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
- A Einstein
cityview1989 4 years ago
I don't want another candidate to win, I want Tancredo for president. So far, hes the most courageous & realistic, the most assertive & the most vocal presidential candidate to address illegal aliens, terrorists & drug smugglers crossing our borders. IF the other candidates are as realistic & frank - they'd say yes. Guess we'll have to wait & see.
onegsoul 4 years ago 3
id vote yes
osaka2004 4 years ago
Posing a simple Yes or No question to politicians is a no win situation.. it doesn't give then any room to equivocate..
pdalko 4 years ago
Im aussie but your president effects me but anyway i wouldnt know who to vote for!! good luck
melbn 4 years ago
If this had come from an animated snowman, CNN might have considered it.
rabair 4 years ago 2
Great question!!!!
mfleming98 4 years ago
Yes, this must be asked, and answered. No obey law, no funds- makes perfect sense. Punish the enablers, demagnitize the attraction to come here along with enforcement. It breeds contempt and disrespect for all laws if these do not get obeyed and go without punishment- anarchy and chaos ensue- down the tubes go our culture and civilization. Thanks liberals.
yankeefan42A 4 years ago 3
a good one
johncattermole 4 years ago
A good question, but they will probably ignore the part about it being a yes or no question. Just a guess. lol :)
misternef 4 years ago
Hmmm.. not a bad question. However will it be considered unfair (if that's the word)since it basically calls the other candidates to give a straight up or down on another candidate's proposal.
SEAZNDragon 4 years ago
YES YES YES!
LiberalshateAmerica 4 years ago
Excellent question!
greengriffin1 4 years ago
Good and simple question. The Democrats can't seem to answer this one.
truthforamerica 4 years ago 2
You know it is Bush who pushes for special privileges for illegal aliens. When have the Democrats been asked this question?
representativepress 4 years ago
Yes, let's blame this on Bush too.
ortzinator 4 years ago
representativepress, the Dems aren't asked this (exact) question because we know they'd NEVER give a straight answer. That's not saying the GOP candidates will either, but it's a big issue with primary voters. BTW, Hillary is big on promising voting rights and legal status to illegals, so whether she answers or not, we already know her position (we have to follow her actions, because her flip-flopping answers make John Kerry look like a straight shooter).
rabair 4 years ago
I hope that question gets chosen! We already Tancredo answer though.
JakeandElwoodBlues 4 years ago
Amen
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
macs are for liberals.
theBigTakeover 4 years ago
Good question. But since the top tier candidates don't really support border security and real immigration reform ... no.
ysonyou 4 years ago