wow, what a quality piece of work here. have you seen the 175 attached pod view from the front. its title is roof top view twin towers. also the slow motion, zoomed in views of the first tower collapse and building seven collapse show detonation flashes . and pentagon before collapse show tiny entry hole, round exit hole, not a scratch on the lawn hitting at the base of the building
The english in this video is not in my humble opinion very good. Please can you team up with someone that is better at English, then be more explanitary and verbose.
In the first secong about driving a car accross ice I understood you talked about making one handle movement. I presume that this is what actually happened. So what? Why would a human not do that.
This looks to be concise detailed data that excludes the possibility of a human pilot due to inhumanly precise visual data verified from existing sources.
I'm not sure where this video goes. Is it about NIST committing another error in its 9/11 investigations? Fine, but there are already so many anyways, some of which being outright fraudulent...
Is this an invitation to question whether the Boeings were "prepped" for 9/11 and maybe were switched with other planes, perhaps above some airport?
Some facts: According to the flight manifests, no Arab boarded those flights. There are no cc records of Arabs purchasing tickets. Disabling transponders do not cause radar invisiblity. Security videos of the alleged hijackers have no reliable chain of custody. The two cell calls alleging "boxcutters" from Barbara Olson failed, (FBI). Atta was a partier with no interest in religion. Many of the alleged hijackers had close ties to US military, intelligence and security institutions... etc etc
bloggulator, tell us the source of your facts. where do you get your information from, and i mean exactly. where did you read it from? with whom did you speak with, can you tell us any of it? i doubt you can provide us with any real credible information. i see you are good at throwing out wild theories, i'm just curious where you get all of these perceived "facts" from? go on, tell us. i'm waiting to hear from you.
Use your initiative! Re. Barbara Olson: check out the FBI's commentary in the Moussaoui trial transcript (no cell calls from Olson). Re. flight manifests: Both UA and AA seating diagrams showed nobody with middle eastern names. Re. Atta: Check the 9/11 commission's co-chairs' statements on Atta's lack of interest in his "faith". Re. transponders: they show the identification of the plane, its radar return remains on screen if t-ponder switched off. Use your head, if your comfort zone allows!
The initial lists supplied by UA and AA contained no Arab names. When the "hijackers" were "identified" by FBI, 9/13, those names were appended. There was much talk in the media about how FAA controllers "couldn't see the returns" because the transponders were out. Furthermore, state of the art military radar in numerous AF/ ANG bases throughout NEADS had those planes precisely pinpointed in latitude, longitude and altitude. And yet they flew freely for up to 90 minutes. Go figure.
You are such a liar... first: AA77 left the gate at 08-20am (10 minutes late) and the flight terminated at 09-38 am. That is 78 minutes, but I guess you are incapable of simple arithmetic... or deliberately lying; Secondly, I was referring to the entire operation... which actually lasted longer than 90 minutes. 3rd: state of the art military radar is most capable of fixing a target's altitude without the aid of a transponder, especially planes as large as 767s. Find the facts first, then post.
so if the freedom of information request shows the planes last used in Dec?, as I understand , would it be possible to preset some kind of control of the plane, even though they knew the 'alleged' hijackers would be taking over the plane, at some point in flight, remote takeover of the plane would continue the course into the buildings regardless of who was the pilot.....this would still keep the hijackers as suspect #1 even if they really weren't in control. Any search for truth is justice...
At 4:33, 4:38, 4:42, 4:47, 4:52 and 4:57 why did the right wing of the real plane "disappear" just before the crash? And why is the plane black coloured at bright sunshine? Please watch here at YT "September Clues".
Don't believe anything. Just analyze the position of the smoke + the position of the sun + the position of the plane.
But you also may believe in TV anchors starring on an empty screen and clapping hands to say "Oh my god!" in the right moment or in backdrops hiding New Jersy and in moving bridges because the CGI guys were drunken when they planned 9/11.
...it's so funny! Someone must have planted these things to descredit any real effort. You can't be that stupid.
"are you trying to say the plane was piloted by a super precise computer which calculated the variance of it's height and angle of bank and pitch and then tried to rectify it?"
Maybe you just google "GPS Assisted Aircraft" with the "site:.x"-Filter.
x set to "edu", "gov" or "mil" for example. There is like a lot of information for this issue.
You conspiracy buffs make me laugh ... you are talking through a hole in your arse ... you have no idea about flying or for that matter engineering ... why not ask the question why didn't BuSh go after Bin Laden instead of Invading Iraq instead of coming up with techinically flawed therories ...
Oh is it? Im a commercial pilot ... I understand flying ... I understand why the plane flew the way it did ... why it hit the way it did and why the ensuing fires eventually led to the towers falling ... you on the other hand look at what is patently and obviously a flawed 'theorie' and decide it must carry some water .. so with all due respect dip shite I think it is your "mental cappacity" which should be called into question.
It doesn't matter if you are commercial pilot or surgeon, you have to explain why the plane flew exactly into perpedicular vector, whcih was also exactly horizontal
after series of 2 maneuvers, like described in the first part of this video, if you can't then your opinion has no value at all
but you won't do that, because you are too afraid
Oh, welcome, commercial pilot. We buffs, what we are (300 professional pilots with us), sitting here, looking through the hole in our arses and doing just one thing! ...waiting for any explanation. So how would you do it?
This dude nehorlavazapalka is a gutless little germ ... a shiver looking for a spine ... a red necked biggoted inbred who hides behind a psudenym cos he hasn't got the guts to say who he really is ... I hope I meet you in a pub one day buddy ... I'm gonna teach you a lesson ... and then I am gonna show ya how you can fly ... and then I am going to see if I can fly your ugly little head into a wall perpendicular like... you dopey little farker ... keep on asking the questions hahahahahahahahaha
...and by the way, I´m no pilot but I´m an engineer. So may be I understand a little about engineering. So you don´t need to explain it for beginners.
Given: a 767 at about 586...592mph performing a maneuver from a 50m/s dive into a precise perpendicular vector in about 9 seconds reaching the precise vektor just in the moment of impact (not earlier not later) flowen by a Cessna pilot by hand and sight. PLEASE enlight our arses! It´s important!
I'll be happy too ... heres the thing conspiracy buffs. The plane wasn't perpendicular. The plane didn't hit precisely. Also vector is spelt with a "C" in aeronautical terms. The plane hit at an angle. I don't quite see what that has to do with anything anyway ... are you trying to say the plane was piloted by a super precise computer which calculated the variance of it's height and angle of bank and pitch and then tried to rectify it??? You guys don't know what your saying ... more to come.
Secondly ... Anyone who has flown a plane will attest to the fact that there can be no comparrison made between the handling charateristics of an air craft and a car driving on ice ... which makes the whole video and point moot doesn't it. Just in case it doesn't a quick lesson for the ignorant and ill informed ... and aircraft flys around 3 axis ... a car on ice moves around 1 ... and if it was on ice doing 500 mpp it wouldn't move around any probably due to intertia and lack of friction ...
You got it. It would be hard to handle one axis. It would be much harder to handle 3 axis. The friction - if you know how to handle the car - will be comparable.
Yes the skills requiered to drive a Bobbycar are basically the exact same skills to drive a Ferrari. The radius of one turn of that powerful large Bobbycar might be 1000 times bigger faster... Just add 2 more axis to hit precisely.
... all those points aside I can asure you ... given 5 hours I could give anyone who has not been in a cockpit prior the basic skills required to point an aircraft at a massive farken building and hit it. But it wouldn't be precise ... I can also tell you that the skills required fly a Cessna 152 are bascially the exact same skills required to hand fly a 767 ... Once the auto pilot was disengaged which is simple as hitting one switch on the dash it was essentially a very poweruful large cessna
And finnaly conspiracy buffs ... if your going to come up with or get behind a theorie get behind one that is not based on bull shite and investigate whether it has any substance ... i.e. my first comment like what the fark were all those eveil farkers doing around Bush telling him to invade Iraq ... Cheney, Rice, Rimsfeld and Wolfowitz ... then ask yourself how that could happen and amke sure it never does again ... but dont buy stupid farken conspiracy theories you idjits!!!!!!!!
Somehow - as in your first comment - I don't got your question. You try that hard to be angry that I cannot understand your language. What's your problem about the things these people have done the way they did it?
So, please inform us as to how the alleged 19 hijackers and OBL got access to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and obtained several tons of 'nano-thermitic' materials which have been analyzed and verified in peer reviewed studies by scientists with access to state of the art equipment in prominent universities in the US and Europe? Perhaps they knocked up this military-grade material in a cave in Afghanistan with a modified kidney dialysis machine? Gimme a break.
8:13 last transmission 5 HJ storming the cockpit 8:21 7 people in the cockpit transponder off / maze 8:24 Atta addressing the passengers pilot secretly pushing the talk back Atta: We have some planes Boston: is it American 11 trying to call me? Atta: Nobody moves! If you trying to move...!
A - the passengers from buisness class still sitting in the maze
B - the passengers from buisness class were evacuated but didn't say a word because the stabbed flight attendants were left behind in the maze
C - the passengers in the caoch called home to told the loved ones that there is a medical emergency in first class and the closed doors prevented the maze from entering the coach
E - the killed passenger from first class next to the curtain to the coach was killed without noise, nobody in first class screamed or cried, the first class wasn't evacuated because the curtain between buisness class and first class prevented the maze from entering the first class, the passengers next to the curtain to the first class had no idea that one was killed + two were stabbed + maze + strange flying maneuvers...
If your intention is to blame someone then you have to involve someone, isn't it?
So if you think it's possible then what would you do in first class? Hijacker kill someone next to you, spray maze, enter the cockpit, block the door are gone... You sit in the maze, cannot breath, burning eyes, while 3 people around you bleed to death. What would you do?
We do now know, that from NTSB .csv files from the FDR of AA77, the flight deck door remained closed throughout the entire 78 minutes of the flight, from 8-20 am when the plane left the gate, until the data stream ceased at around 09-38 am. The flight data recorder software scans the flight deck door status every 4 seconds.... the door remained closed throughout. How did the hijackers enter the cockpit? by osmosis, shapeshifting into bugs, or via a cabin window and in thru the cockpit window?
This is an amazing analysis. Great work. I think the implications of this point very clearly to an automated assault on the towers via remote control or a pre-programmed flightplan.
My guess is the planes were flown precisely by remote control. The perpetrators couldn't afford any human errors because that would have spoiled the plan for controlled demolition.
Maybe the second tower was purposely hit off center to create the enormous fireball spectacular. Shock and Awe.
I also think real terrorists would of struck the towers much lower to trap the people and increase casualties.
But who knows. That's why we need a REAL investigation ;)
wow, what a quality piece of work here. have you seen the 175 attached pod view from the front. its title is roof top view twin towers. also the slow motion, zoomed in views of the first tower collapse and building seven collapse show detonation flashes . and pentagon before collapse show tiny entry hole, round exit hole, not a scratch on the lawn hitting at the base of the building
polok890 1 month ago
What was up with the example at the beginning that in no way related to driving a plane into the twin towers?
MegaYeshua33 2 months ago
Your right! It was a hologram!
1LibranRabbit 4 months ago
The english in this video is not in my humble opinion very good. Please can you team up with someone that is better at English, then be more explanitary and verbose.
In the first secong about driving a car accross ice I understood you talked about making one handle movement. I presume that this is what actually happened. So what? Why would a human not do that.
timtak1 1 year ago
This looks to be concise detailed data that excludes the possibility of a human pilot due to inhumanly precise visual data verified from existing sources.
Looks to be pretty iron clad.
marquedesade 1 year ago
I checked the BTS and there is almost completely consistent BTS record of the tailnumbers in question during the months before 9/11 2001
tumetuestumefaisdubi 1 year ago
Never go full Retard!
gugaberg123 1 year ago
I'm not sure where this video goes. Is it about NIST committing another error in its 9/11 investigations? Fine, but there are already so many anyways, some of which being outright fraudulent...
Is this an invitation to question whether the Boeings were "prepped" for 9/11 and maybe were switched with other planes, perhaps above some airport?
Love,
DanUuNoel 2 years ago
Man, the spelling just ruins the credibility of the video.
WAtvVideos 2 years ago
Comment removed
Denierbud11 2 years ago
Some facts: According to the flight manifests, no Arab boarded those flights. There are no cc records of Arabs purchasing tickets. Disabling transponders do not cause radar invisiblity. Security videos of the alleged hijackers have no reliable chain of custody. The two cell calls alleging "boxcutters" from Barbara Olson failed, (FBI). Atta was a partier with no interest in religion. Many of the alleged hijackers had close ties to US military, intelligence and security institutions... etc etc
bloggulator 2 years ago 3
uhm, nvm :-)
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
Almost all the "hijackers" lived within 11 miles of the Pentagon, in a small town in VA.
RuffleTheTeacher 2 years ago
bloggulator, tell us the source of your facts. where do you get your information from, and i mean exactly. where did you read it from? with whom did you speak with, can you tell us any of it? i doubt you can provide us with any real credible information. i see you are good at throwing out wild theories, i'm just curious where you get all of these perceived "facts" from? go on, tell us. i'm waiting to hear from you.
al5422 2 years ago
Use your initiative! Re. Barbara Olson: check out the FBI's commentary in the Moussaoui trial transcript (no cell calls from Olson). Re. flight manifests: Both UA and AA seating diagrams showed nobody with middle eastern names. Re. Atta: Check the 9/11 commission's co-chairs' statements on Atta's lack of interest in his "faith". Re. transponders: they show the identification of the plane, its radar return remains on screen if t-ponder switched off. Use your head, if your comfort zone allows!
bloggulator 2 years ago
some lies: you told:
"According to the flight manifests, no Arab boarded those flights."
Have you EVER? looked at the manifests? all the hijackers names are listed.
Noone said disabling transponders caused radar invisibility? why bring it up?
911foughtback 2 years ago
The initial lists supplied by UA and AA contained no Arab names. When the "hijackers" were "identified" by FBI, 9/13, those names were appended. There was much talk in the media about how FAA controllers "couldn't see the returns" because the transponders were out. Furthermore, state of the art military radar in numerous AF/ ANG bases throughout NEADS had those planes precisely pinpointed in latitude, longitude and altitude. And yet they flew freely for up to 90 minutes. Go figure.
bloggulator 2 years ago
a few things you lied about.
1: the lists published were "victim" lists. look at the real manifests. or dont talk.
2:flew freely for 90 mins? list to times from then the planes were hijacked to when they crashed
AA11: 35mins
UAL175: 17mins
AA77: 43mins
UA93: 35mins
911foughtback 2 years ago
You are such a liar... first: AA77 left the gate at 08-20am (10 minutes late) and the flight terminated at 09-38 am. That is 78 minutes, but I guess you are incapable of simple arithmetic... or deliberately lying; Secondly, I was referring to the entire operation... which actually lasted longer than 90 minutes. 3rd: state of the art military radar is most capable of fixing a target's altitude without the aid of a transponder, especially planes as large as 767s. Find the facts first, then post.
bloggulator 2 years ago
so if the freedom of information request shows the planes last used in Dec?, as I understand , would it be possible to preset some kind of control of the plane, even though they knew the 'alleged' hijackers would be taking over the plane, at some point in flight, remote takeover of the plane would continue the course into the buildings regardless of who was the pilot.....this would still keep the hijackers as suspect #1 even if they really weren't in control. Any search for truth is justice...
rushfan9thcmd 2 years ago 2
At 4:33, 4:38, 4:42, 4:47, 4:52 and 4:57 why did the right wing of the real plane "disappear" just before the crash? And why is the plane black coloured at bright sunshine? Please watch here at YT "September Clues".
YousufM24 2 years ago
Q1: low resolution + interlaced source + converted (e.g. framerate) + compressed to fit into pre-HQ-youtube.
Google for MPEG compression!
Q2: the plane flew into the shadow of the smoke from the North Tower + high contrast (nice day) poorly handled by a consumer handycam.
achimspok 2 years ago
Did you watch "September Clues"? Pls let me know!
Take care
YousufM24 2 years ago
Oh yes. What a waste of time.
Watch my "No Plane Manifesto". It's some kind of "September Clues Parody".
achimspok 2 years ago
Oh, yes. What a waste of time, too!
No need to bring me arguments? Sorry, that doesn't work.
I love the truth.
YousufM24 2 years ago
@YousufM24 lol u mean shittember clues. its such bullshit its unreal. type in cgi planes debunked 2 watch the fox fake plane thing get debunked
drifter402 7 months ago
that sounds dumb, sorry. A plane flew into the shadow of the smoke? How stupid do you think I must be, to belive this? No way...
YousufM24 2 years ago
you have a very interesting sense of humor
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
Don't believe anything. Just analyze the position of the smoke + the position of the sun + the position of the plane.
But you also may believe in TV anchors starring on an empty screen and clapping hands to say "Oh my god!" in the right moment or in backdrops hiding New Jersy and in moving bridges because the CGI guys were drunken when they planned 9/11.
...it's so funny! Someone must have planted these things to descredit any real effort. You can't be that stupid.
achimspok 2 years ago
...can't you?
achimspok 2 years ago
"are you trying to say the plane was piloted by a super precise computer which calculated the variance of it's height and angle of bank and pitch and then tried to rectify it?"
Maybe you just google "GPS Assisted Aircraft" with the "site:.x"-Filter.
x set to "edu", "gov" or "mil" for example. There is like a lot of information for this issue.
daBeco 2 years ago
You conspiracy buffs make me laugh ... you are talking through a hole in your arse ... you have no idea about flying or for that matter engineering ... why not ask the question why didn't BuSh go after Bin Laden instead of Invading Iraq instead of coming up with techinically flawed therories ...
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
great, at least we know that you can't find any argument against the video, your mental capacity is very low
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
Oh is it? Im a commercial pilot ... I understand flying ... I understand why the plane flew the way it did ... why it hit the way it did and why the ensuing fires eventually led to the towers falling ... you on the other hand look at what is patently and obviously a flawed 'theorie' and decide it must carry some water .. so with all due respect dip shite I think it is your "mental cappacity" which should be called into question.
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
It doesn't matter if you are commercial pilot or surgeon, you have to explain why the plane flew exactly into perpedicular vector, whcih was also exactly horizontal
after series of 2 maneuvers, like described in the first part of this video, if you can't then your opinion has no value at all
but you won't do that, because you are too afraid
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
Oh, welcome, commercial pilot. We buffs, what we are (300 professional pilots with us), sitting here, looking through the hole in our arses and doing just one thing! ...waiting for any explanation. So how would you do it?
achimspok 2 years ago
Who are these professional pilots? What air craft do they fly? These nameless pilots how many hours do they have?
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
They would have to pay me, otherwise I wouldn't fly with an asshole like you
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
You wouldn't fly that much anyway would you buddy ... too busy looking up conspiracy theories on line ... ya tool!
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
This dude nehorlavazapalka is a gutless little germ ... a shiver looking for a spine ... a red necked biggoted inbred who hides behind a psudenym cos he hasn't got the guts to say who he really is ... I hope I meet you in a pub one day buddy ... I'm gonna teach you a lesson ... and then I am gonna show ya how you can fly ... and then I am going to see if I can fly your ugly little head into a wall perpendicular like... you dopey little farker ... keep on asking the questions hahahahahahahahaha
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
thank you, you've just deserved a permanent block by achimspok, you won't spam his work anymore
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
...and by the way, I´m no pilot but I´m an engineer. So may be I understand a little about engineering. So you don´t need to explain it for beginners.
Given: a 767 at about 586...592mph performing a maneuver from a 50m/s dive into a precise perpendicular vector in about 9 seconds reaching the precise vektor just in the moment of impact (not earlier not later) flowen by a Cessna pilot by hand and sight. PLEASE enlight our arses! It´s important!
achimspok 2 years ago
I'll be happy too ... heres the thing conspiracy buffs. The plane wasn't perpendicular. The plane didn't hit precisely. Also vector is spelt with a "C" in aeronautical terms. The plane hit at an angle. I don't quite see what that has to do with anything anyway ... are you trying to say the plane was piloted by a super precise computer which calculated the variance of it's height and angle of bank and pitch and then tried to rectify it??? You guys don't know what your saying ... more to come.
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
"the plane wasn't perpendicular"
did you watch the video? Show us your analysis of the impact angle, bitch!
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
Secondly ... Anyone who has flown a plane will attest to the fact that there can be no comparrison made between the handling charateristics of an air craft and a car driving on ice ... which makes the whole video and point moot doesn't it. Just in case it doesn't a quick lesson for the ignorant and ill informed ... and aircraft flys around 3 axis ... a car on ice moves around 1 ... and if it was on ice doing 500 mpp it wouldn't move around any probably due to intertia and lack of friction ...
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
You got it. It would be hard to handle one axis. It would be much harder to handle 3 axis. The friction - if you know how to handle the car - will be comparable.
Yes the skills requiered to drive a Bobbycar are basically the exact same skills to drive a Ferrari. The radius of one turn of that powerful large Bobbycar might be 1000 times bigger faster... Just add 2 more axis to hit precisely.
btw. vector with "C" and Rumsfeld with "U"
achimspok 2 years ago
... all those points aside I can asure you ... given 5 hours I could give anyone who has not been in a cockpit prior the basic skills required to point an aircraft at a massive farken building and hit it. But it wouldn't be precise ... I can also tell you that the skills required fly a Cessna 152 are bascially the exact same skills required to hand fly a 767 ... Once the auto pilot was disengaged which is simple as hitting one switch on the dash it was essentially a very poweruful large cessna
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
And finnaly conspiracy buffs ... if your going to come up with or get behind a theorie get behind one that is not based on bull shite and investigate whether it has any substance ... i.e. my first comment like what the fark were all those eveil farkers doing around Bush telling him to invade Iraq ... Cheney, Rice, Rimsfeld and Wolfowitz ... then ask yourself how that could happen and amke sure it never does again ... but dont buy stupid farken conspiracy theories you idjits!!!!!!!!
jamiestaceyxander 2 years ago
Comment removed
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
your so totally bitch
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
Somehow - as in your first comment - I don't got your question. You try that hard to be angry that I cannot understand your language. What's your problem about the things these people have done the way they did it?
achimspok 2 years ago
So, please inform us as to how the alleged 19 hijackers and OBL got access to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and obtained several tons of 'nano-thermitic' materials which have been analyzed and verified in peer reviewed studies by scientists with access to state of the art equipment in prominent universities in the US and Europe? Perhaps they knocked up this military-grade material in a cave in Afghanistan with a modified kidney dialysis machine? Gimme a break.
bloggulator 2 years ago
The transponders when they are off. you can see where they are. but you dont have altitude.
911foughtback 2 years ago
Good video. But the music. Its frustrating... But better than debunking porn-like music... :)
Moxastin 2 years ago
thx for the video.
i have two questions if the stunt was done by remote control or autopilot as supposed.
what you do with the phone calls (about hijackers)?
what you do with the communication with the hijackers from cockpit?
daBeco 2 years ago
achimspok 2 years ago
A - Atta replies to Boston
B - Atta replies to a passenger
C - Atta replies to himself
D - no communication
achimspok 2 years ago
8:41
Sweeney told Woodward that passengers in coach were under the impression that there was a routine medical emergency in first class.
achimspok 2 years ago
A - the passengers from buisness class still sitting in the maze
B - the passengers from buisness class were evacuated but didn't say a word because the stabbed flight attendants were left behind in the maze
C - the passengers in the caoch called home to told the loved ones that there is a medical emergency in first class and the closed doors prevented the maze from entering the coach
achimspok 2 years ago
E - the killed passenger from first class next to the curtain to the coach was killed without noise, nobody in first class screamed or cried, the first class wasn't evacuated because the curtain between buisness class and first class prevented the maze from entering the first class, the passengers next to the curtain to the first class had no idea that one was killed + two were stabbed + maze + strange flying maneuvers...
Would you say it's possible?
achimspok 2 years ago
yes i think it's possible, thanks again.
while reading your explanation i was still like 'if the unhuman autopilot could do the job what for were the human hijackers in the first place?'
daBeco 2 years ago
If your intention is to blame someone then you have to involve someone, isn't it?
So if you think it's possible then what would you do in first class? Hijacker kill someone next to you, spray maze, enter the cockpit, block the door are gone... You sit in the maze, cannot breath, burning eyes, while 3 people around you bleed to death. What would you do?
achimspok 2 years ago
alright.
you got some good and easy to understand argues. :)
daBeco 2 years ago
We do now know, that from NTSB .csv files from the FDR of AA77, the flight deck door remained closed throughout the entire 78 minutes of the flight, from 8-20 am when the plane left the gate, until the data stream ceased at around 09-38 am. The flight data recorder software scans the flight deck door status every 4 seconds.... the door remained closed throughout. How did the hijackers enter the cockpit? by osmosis, shapeshifting into bugs, or via a cabin window and in thru the cockpit window?
bloggulator 2 years ago
@bloggulator could you send me where i could look at that info?
i spent about an hour looking throughout NTSB website
thanks
siti1ca 1 year ago
This is an amazing analysis. Great work. I think the implications of this point very clearly to an automated assault on the towers via remote control or a pre-programmed flightplan.
This is very provocative stuff.
theCharmingDeviant 2 years ago
WOW!!
Please, what is the url for that FOIA information about the last flights of 3 of the 4 planes?
That is new information for me.
Thanks!
YougeneDebs 2 years ago
I put the link into the video. Just wait a little bit after the text appeared.
achimspok 2 years ago
My guess is the planes were flown precisely by remote control. The perpetrators couldn't afford any human errors because that would have spoiled the plan for controlled demolition.
Maybe the second tower was purposely hit off center to create the enormous fireball spectacular. Shock and Awe.
I also think real terrorists would of struck the towers much lower to trap the people and increase casualties.
But who knows. That's why we need a REAL investigation ;)
paulymac 2 years ago
My conclusions:
1) Any kid should get a driver license after absolving 100 hours Nintendo.
2) NIST should give the money back or contribute it to the victims of car accidents.
3) Ali Baba flew 3 mathematical functions
f(x) = x + vx*t + ax*t²
f(y) = y + vy*t + ay*t²
f(z) = z + vz*t + az*t²
That's probably the way Cessna pilots usually fly. If not... then we have a serious problem.
achimspok 2 years ago
Superb as always. Your conclusions would be handy (though obvious), just for completeness.
femr2 2 years ago