Thank you to whoever posted this. There's nothing better than either reading a good book or listening to some person that know what they're talking about to go to sleep to. Ty.
I think Bob Siegel is a very poor speaker. He needs to stop saying ahhh, aaaa, then making that stupid finger smacking noise when he stutters. All of his hesitations during the speech makes him very difficult to listen to and learn from. *
Its only reasonable religious people act illogical. Logic is something granted by the devil. The devil who was created through perfection. The very devil who seems to rival a god with infinite power. infinite power that that has been matched by his mere son. I cant disprove your god but you cant also disprove the flying speghetti monster. Your religion may have history but so do the greeks of which your commedments where taken from.
@toiwin ''The most likely diagnosis of Akhen-Aton's disease is hyper-pituitarism. All bony abnormalities seem to favor such diagnosis, together with the sexual ones. A late onset of acromegaly or delayed hypo-gonadism sound to be most descriptive for his illness.'' I've found this on the net. Somehow, it seems that a deformity might have affected the lineage from there and that it might have been exaggerated in artistic depictions of his lineage and of his wife Nefertiti.
Hi, I am a psych grad and I have started a lecture series on my channel on Behavioral Science, I hope to go on to talk about evolution in a few weeks down the road. So do check out my channel if interested!
@HomleandSecurity yeah please do that...so u would profit the book sellers from buying the origin of species...and dont forget burning the book doesnt change a thing....enjoy ur little victory..
@HomleandSecurity no ur too stupid to understand it...and wait i suppose the idea of an invisible man making magic is any better?? if u were intelligent u wouldnt accept religious nonsense
@HomleandSecurity Yeah, you really "disproved" the theories in a book by burning it. That's actually quite interesting considering all religious losers mindlessly chanting "you can't prove there is no god". If only the atheists would realise that all they have to do is burn some bibles and the "god theory" is disproven...
@HomleandSecurity I should really get me one of those "blog" thingies. Seems they help a lot in the "forever" proving superstitious bullshit business.
Really? You have disproved the biggest reference the whole idea of science have for more than a century? Who are you? Why haven't I heard about that in every news? Disproving Darwin is worth of a Nobel prize... you should be the greatest biologist of all time.
people need to leave their ridiculous mystical beliefs in the past. its the fucking 21st century people. I just shake my head when I think about all our advancements in science and technology but most people still believe in something they can't even define and have never seen proof of.
@Killjeser Well, the subject was about jesus and I found it relevent to curse him. Do u think I wouldn't go off on other messangers of so called God? Don't u think if there is a God who wants to communicate with us, all he had to do was to show up in the sky for the publuc like every 5 years instead of hiding behind the scense for the past millinium or sending his sons through time to kill for him while he was smoking his cigar in a hot tub watching & enjoying the pleasant blood shed he created?
The Teaching Company has a great course called Darwinian Revolution which lays out the history prior to the theory & follows it through to modern times. It's very interesting, I didn't know that evolution theories had been around before Darwin & his own grandfather (Erasmus Darwin) had a theory of his own.
Eiseley (1959) vigorously promoted the thesis that Edward Blyth had established the theory of evolution by natural selection in 1835 and that Darwin surely had read Blyths paper. The fact is Darwin owned copies of Blyths work, and that these copies have Darwins notes in the margin, Professor George Simpson acknowledged that Darwin was lying. Sorry Stanford but do your homework
@petebax1 However, the subsequent discovery of Darwin's notebooks has "permitted the refutation of Eiseley's claims".[12] Both Mayr and Darlington interpret Blyth's view of natural selection as maintaining the type: You're full of shit.
Why the hell do such prestigious universities and scientists in the US continue to give a platform to creationism and other idiocy by arguing against it... its stupid... just ignore it and continue to do science....
Leave debating the creationists and other whack jobs to comedy central!
@Acmd7 so what percentage of the world are you, the 40% of Christianity, and then are you the 60% of that *Catholics* or are you orthodox, and even then, are you Lutheran, Baptist, Protestant. How can u think that one specific set of beliefs is right, atheist is the most balanced and logical stand. It doesnt deny god, just says he cant be proved, ESPECIALLY by scriptures
@Acmd7 so what percentage of the world are you, the 40% of Christianity, and then are you the 60% of that *Catholics* or are you orthodox, and even then, are you Lutheran, Baptist, Protestant. How can u think that one specific set of beliefs is right, atheist is the most balanced and logical stand. It doesn't deny god, just says he cant be proved, ESPECIALLY by scriptures
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yeap. You, retarded, are one of those fanatics blinded bigots. The only luck you have is that the Bible have prophecies for the quality of the man on the last days. People like you. Not only arrogant and stupid, but full of contempt, enemies of God, hateful, jealous, more friends of their pleasures than their creator, a heart lost and in the dark. For this reason, I believe that even the Science shows all the evidence to show how stupid and basic darwin theory is, regardless! nobody will stop
I am a believer not a christian though, but frankly I dont see why you are bashing up darwin. The astrobiologist pointed out rightly, just like copernicus and galileo was ostracized by ignorants bigots at that time, darwin is being dealth with in the same manner. I dont think darwin theory takes away God's glory, its our myopic understanding which thinks that by accepting evolution somehow we are insulting God, how absurd. I think in 100 years the religious opposition will die out not darwin!
@muaztrek Sorry to bother you after all this time; I don't usually do this.
"I dont think darwin theory takes away God's glory" True; what it does take away is the core of all Christianity. Evolution (genetics too, but nobody seems to take on it) proves that humanity cannot have originated with 2 people; there is no Adam and Eve. Without them, there is no original sin. Without original sin, Jesus' sacrifice on the cross is meaningless. All of Christianity collapses without the original sin.
Darwin will be forgotten???? it's u , Xian morons who are going into oblivion. China and India produces tons of engineers and doctors every year. stupid Xians will eliminate themselves from gene pool by not learning science.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the hate against God, so...folks like you would never accept anything that honor the All Mighty.
That's why Intelligent Design is such a threat for retards like you, my friend...ohohoh the more data all Scientists and Institutes gather, the crazier morons like you will become.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Charles Darwin spent his whole time explaining religion. I would like to see him to explain Science.
Science has been always propelled by a theological view. Same case for humanism, a secular theology. The revelation in Biology came in the 50's (genetics), not in darwin.
Darwin is not only pessimistic about human, but for him we are just an accident.
thank you for making this available to the public.. it's a good start after decades of scientists thinking they didn't need to confront religions hence hurting the entire nation.
There's a book called, "How to win the lottery, guaranteed".
Would you then claim that I'm a multi millionaire because I have read that book.
Claiming something to be true isn't evidence, if it were we wouldnt be sitting here as I would surely have been struck down by the wrath of your god many years ago.
1. Where has macro evolution ever been observed? What's the mechanism for getting new complexity such as new vital organs? How, for example, could a caterpillar evolve into a butterfly?
2. Where are the billions of transitional fossils that should be there if your theory is right? Billions! Not a handful of questionable transitions. Why don't we see a reasonably smooth continuum among all living creatures, or in the fossil record, or both?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Whatever: answer this: 1. Where has macro evolution ever been observed? What's the mechanism for getting new complexity such as new vital organs? How, for example, could a caterpillar evolve into a butterfly?
2. Where are the billions of transitional fossils that should be there if your theory is right? Billions! Not a handful of questionable transitions. Why don't we see a reasonably smooth continuum among all living creatures, or in the fossil record, or both?
A same family of proteins has the same pace of mutation in different species, that is to say in absolute time, not in a time measured by the succession of generation (which is different for each specie because of its particular lengths of life). Proteins mutate at the same pace whatever the number of generations. Darwin's ideology is dead.
I appreciate this video. And I'm going to comment purely on my appreciation of the video - arguments made here are futile as they do not contribute to anything other than brittle crumbs of the pie. Thanks Stanford!
M.a.n.h.u.n.t.= "Must acronym now have unethical, needless terms?"
R.e.t.a.r.d.= "Retarded evolution theory arguments reject design"
Arguments posited by evolutionists can't have design behind them because the universe is not supposed to be designed, but "Just the appearance" of design. Since evolutionists are a by-product of a universe that is not designed, then that includes their thoughts, minds and arguments. Aren't all these things subsumed under their "non-designed universe"?
My point was not that DNA was not a code. It was that it was not a perfectly designed code that you should expect from a perfect all knowing being. Trust me When humans have the "code" to develop living beings they wont be fragile animals with so many imperfections. We will by nature improve upon the design. Now for a god that can see everything. Youd think he would have predicted this, and perfected us sooner. more to be said in a bit for now i must eat.
Well guess the i suppose it depends on your definition of god. I personally believe that something intangable and beautiful exists in our universe. A type of greater truth or beauty. Too me thats god, but in most of the worlds religions god is personified as having human traits, and emotions. We are made in his image, correct? So by being i mean something that exists, and is aware of its own existence. Something that is sentient. Also anything that exists, has some type of form.
I agree intangible and beautiful. But, I think that we are manglomaniacs to think that we're really made in "his" image. We're just a small part of a living system, a system full of intelligent creatures with specialized traits. All creatures have their own self-defense mechanisms, ours just happens to be contemplation and building things with our hands. This contemplation leads to a desire to try to explain all things...even the unexplainable. Formless, undefinable energy permeates all.
I completely agree with dieoxynu.. Further more, Give me one other example of life. Suppose on a different planet "DNA CODE" develops with a completely different chemical make up. Maybe even a different coding structure. Will you make the argument that the same all powerful being went to that planet too and made them in his likeness?
The book Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life is written by Hubert Yockey, the foremost living specialist in bioinformatics. The publisher is Cambridge University press. Yockey rigorously demonstrates that the coding process in DNA is identical to the coding process and mathematical definitions used in Electrical Engineering. This is not subjective, it is not debatable or even controversial. It is a brute fact:
First if all, not all creatures have two eyes. Spiders can have as many as eight, for example.
The reason so many have two is because having two eyes makes it easy to judge distances accurately. This ability increases the odds of survival and therefor is strongly favored by natural selection.
But they're not holding each other during mating. Whale hip bones are vestigial; they do nothing. They're not even attached to the main skeletal structure at all, but float freely in the torso. Whales have hip bones because, at some point in the past, their ancestors had @#$% LEGS.
The reason whales are as large as they are is precisely because they returned to the sea. The bouyancy afforded by water allowed whales--some whales--to grow much larger than their land-bound ancestors must have been.
But why would a whale's whale ancestors have hip bones?
You are an idiot and offer zero proof for evolution. Saying that someone doesnt believe as you do just shows your bias. Go ahead educate us poor dumb Christians.The fact is, evolution fails miserably and in this regard there is zero evidence for macroevolution, which is why evolutionists never present any.
"Saying that someone doesnt believe as you do just shows your bias." That sentence doesn't make much sence, but yes I am bias. Not all Christians are dumb. Macroevolution isn't a term used by the scientific comunity really. The Galapagos islands and places all over the world offer many examples of animals adapting, through natural selection, to their environment. The tortoises and birds there and well basically every plant and animal and fossil on the planet is evidence.
I suggest some activities that will cost you no money yet will give you ample evidence about evolution.
1) Go to your closest public library and ask to read Richard Dawkins' "The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution". The title is self explanatory.
2) Please seek the channels of YouTube users AronRa, DonExodus, and C0nc0rdance.
Now you know where to find evidence for "macroevolution".
Get to your local Borders or PL and ask to read."God The Evidence" by Patrick Glynn as well as "The collapse of evolution" by Scott M. Huse." The titles say it all.
Also Youtube Ravi Zacharias as well as Patrick Glynn,"The Collapse of Atheism." Now, where is your evidence for evolution.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Thats the whole point. There is no evidence for evolution. Your sources collect and redistirbut lies and garbage because they hate God just like yourself.Evolution does not affirm anything because it's as real as a chicken feather plucking ceremony in Rawanda.
I think that I speak for all who are either open-minded, free thinking, atheists and others who are interested in the origin of the human race when I say: shut up, listen and learn. Empirical truths is what religion is based on, science works differently.. it takes evidence, composes a theory which can be tested by ANYone (including you).. but if the results are there, it won't be denied.
Your theory of a God, and a man that rises from the dead can't be proven.. proof it, or I won't honor it.
This is quite interesting point. Question about the God existence should not be a part of a science. But if you need a prove of his presence, tell me please than... do you love your family? I`m think you do. I believe, you do. But can you prove it? Faith is probably the greatest - existing thing in the universe. Without it, civilization we wouldn`t be possible.
It is borderline insane to state that I must believe because I love my family and friends. It is borderline racist to state that I must be killed or sent to hell (if there is such a thing) if I don't believe in a man in the sky/heavens.
If religion wasn't based on hatred towards others (man, women and children) I might be interested in joining your frat-party.
I have no issues with religion, I have issues with their ever growing fan-clubs based on stories that can't be proven.
We would never dismiss real evidence because we believe in science. Evolution is as valid as chicken feather plucking in Nigeria to see what the future holds.Evolution is a lie. A bald faced lie which offers up zero empirical proof and zero support. It'll be dead in 10 years. Science will validate my prediction.Science already has.Just stop using my tax dollars to tell lies.Stop thinking in our schools and I'll stop praying in your backyard.
There is no talking to you, you are obviously being deliberately ignorant.
Like I said, ignoring reality won't make it go away.
From your own bible,
Hear this, you foolish and senseless people, who have eyes but do not see, who have ears but do not hear, Jeremiah 5:21
At least when you die you'll have no senses, it would come as an aweful shock to realised that you had been wrong all this time and there is no heaven waiting for you.
Science isn't about a bunch of people 'believing' in something... is about formulating experiments to probe hypotesis about thing that might become (not for ever) theories'
He is quite illiterate. Doesn't even understand some of the words he uses and isn't interested in what anyone has to say on the subject and I imagine goes to Sunday mass every week where he hears some fanatic that tells him, " if you believe in evolution you'll go to hell" so he's terrified of the consequences of evolution. You can only feel sorry.
sukruoosten: "youre ancester 4,6 biljon years ago was a piece of rock/bacterie"
Well.. if you believe 'intelligent design' means an intelligent designer then ralise that an intelligent designer IS an intelligent design and therefor needs and 'intelligent designer' and that intelligent designer is an intelligent design and therefor ... Not sure if the Big Bang IS the cause of us being here but it is clear that an 'intelligent designer' needs a lot more than a "Big Ban" to exist.
The genetic code has many of the properties of codes in general, specifically the Morse Code, the Universal Product Bar Code, ASCII, and the US Postal Code. I shall explain the relation of these codes to the genetic code in the following discussion. Every code, as the term is used in this book, can be regarded as a channel with an input alphabet A and an output alphabet B.
have any of you ever heard of junk DNA? DNA is not comparable to the machine language we use to program computers. It contains patterns used build protiens. Thats different than representing boulean logic, or ASCII. WHen programers write programs they dont have junk instructions. Every piece of code is tested and developed with a purpose.
If you can provide an empirical example of a code or language that occurs naturally (no mind involved), outside the realm of life, outside the realm of DNA. All you need is one example.
otherwise my proof of GODs existance stands
3) Therefore DNA was designed by a mind.
Who is that mind? I wonder if its our creator (you can pray to him he is not far from you)
Why are you polluting this academic commentary with ridiculous arguments on the existence of deities?
Nature doesn't care about your silly notions- just because you cannot fathom a progression of natural laws that produces something so profound, doesn't mean other people aren't going to try and figure it out.
God is such a silly and crass answer. His commandment: "you shall not think!"
Do you ever notice how when you totally debunk their comments, the only thing they come back with is some stupid question asking you to prove a negative? I love these lectures as they can teach me great things, creationists only spew dogma.
what the hell is valu777 talking about, did he listen to this lecture at all........do you realize buddy that your argument about what darwin wrote means nothing because we have far more powerful microscopes now and other ways to test his theory that weren't available to him. like electron microscopes.
Jesus, yielded up the ghost behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying Truly this was the Son of God.
Biblical zombies. Yay! How could I not believe for so long? Of course the bible is inerrant. If I had known about zombies, I would have believed years ago. Spread the word brother valu777. You are doing Christianity the highest honor by spreading the word. Who could doubt us now?
Darwin, My Life and Letters Vol. 1, page 210, letter to Mr bentham admits, When we decend into details we can prove that no one species has changed ( i.e. We cannot prove that a single species has changed); nor can we prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the ground work of the theory.
This has been flagged as spam show
great talent .. very entertaining .. thanks
fivequotes 5 days ago
Thank you to whoever posted this. There's nothing better than either reading a good book or listening to some person that know what they're talking about to go to sleep to. Ty.
101truthhurts 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1:58 Who counts in base 9?
mitchells00 1 month ago
Comment removed
mitchells00 1 month ago
Comment removed
mitchells00 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
whos Darwin!?
grunder20 2 months ago
Comment removed
bboots100 2 months ago
Thanks for these lectures!
Greetings from sunny Bulgaria!
LachezarTsK 2 months ago
this is great!im learning lot of new things
thebigfootme 2 months ago
I still doubt Darwin's theory of evolution..
agapitoflores001 2 months ago
I think Bob Siegel is a very poor speaker. He needs to stop saying ahhh, aaaa, then making that stupid finger smacking noise when he stutters. All of his hesitations during the speech makes him very difficult to listen to and learn from. *
Sunriseseller 2 months ago
DARwin saw in an ape, Marilyn Monroe.
AntiChrista4WPeace 4 months ago
Its only reasonable religious people act illogical. Logic is something granted by the devil. The devil who was created through perfection. The very devil who seems to rival a god with infinite power. infinite power that that has been matched by his mere son. I cant disprove your god but you cant also disprove the flying speghetti monster. Your religion may have history but so do the greeks of which your commedments where taken from.
pureefficient 4 months ago in playlist Course | Darwin's Legacy
A bunch of Smart people in Stanford University :) a Damn Great Univ :)
mayaforpeaceful 5 months ago
Darwin is my king of Jews.
sargentnoob 6 months ago
@sargentnoob
Darwin isn't a Jew !
mideastatheist 4 months ago
@mideastatheist They say that Jesus was the King of Jews. I was poking fun of them.
sargentnoob 4 months ago
elongated skulls of the pharohs, anyone want to chime in with their theory
toiwin 8 months ago in playlist Course | Darwin's Legacy
@toiwin ''The most likely diagnosis of Akhen-Aton's disease is hyper-pituitarism. All bony abnormalities seem to favor such diagnosis, together with the sexual ones. A late onset of acromegaly or delayed hypo-gonadism sound to be most descriptive for his illness.'' I've found this on the net. Somehow, it seems that a deformity might have affected the lineage from there and that it might have been exaggerated in artistic depictions of his lineage and of his wife Nefertiti.
Juicexlx 7 months ago in playlist Course | Darwin's Legacy
Hi, I am a psych grad and I have started a lecture series on my channel on Behavioral Science, I hope to go on to talk about evolution in a few weeks down the road. So do check out my channel if interested!
flybybutterflies 8 months ago
Novel about an alternative view of evolution see video book trailer
dltanner99 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alternative view of evolution see video book trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
Feb 12 is Charles Darwin’s 202nd bday. In celebration of God, we will be mass burning Darwin’s Origin of Species on that day. Please join us.
HomleandSecurity 11 months ago
@HomleandSecurity yeah please do that...so u would profit the book sellers from buying the origin of species...and dont forget burning the book doesnt change a thing....enjoy ur little victory..
marwanxyz123 11 months ago
@marwanxyz123 All the copies were stolen from shops and libraries across the country. We burned 5,700 copies of Darwin's bullshit this year.
HomleandSecurity 11 months ago
@HomleandSecurity exactly... this is what religion does it create thief's and ppl who poses no morals... thanx for proving my point
marwanxyz123 11 months ago
@marwanxyz123 And I disproved Darwin
HomleandSecurity 11 months ago
@HomleandSecurity what..i cant hear u well?? ohh thats right ur tiny brain doesnt understand the theory of evolution by natural selection...ok
marwanxyz123 11 months ago
@marwanxyz123 I'm just too intelligent to accept that nonsense.
HomleandSecurity 11 months ago
@HomleandSecurity no ur too stupid to understand it...and wait i suppose the idea of an invisible man making magic is any better?? if u were intelligent u wouldnt accept religious nonsense
marwanxyz123 11 months ago
@HomleandSecurity Yeah, you really "disproved" the theories in a book by burning it. That's actually quite interesting considering all religious losers mindlessly chanting "you can't prove there is no god". If only the atheists would realise that all they have to do is burn some bibles and the "god theory" is disproven...
KungPisstank 10 months ago
@KungPisstank I completely disproved Darwin forever in a post on my blog.
HomleandSecurity 10 months ago
@HomleandSecurity I should really get me one of those "blog" thingies. Seems they help a lot in the "forever" proving superstitious bullshit business.
KungPisstank 9 months ago
@KungPisstank Only if you're Republican. It doesn't help gutless commies.
HomleandSecurity 9 months ago
@HomleandSecurity
Really? You have disproved the biggest reference the whole idea of science have for more than a century? Who are you? Why haven't I heard about that in every news? Disproving Darwin is worth of a Nobel prize... you should be the greatest biologist of all time.
bragdale 8 months ago
@bragdale I am the greatest biologist of all time. Good to see some people are starting to point it out.
HomleandSecurity 8 months ago
@HomleandSecurity Why? Did you found out, that you are so stupid, that you can't exist?
nekronata 7 months ago
@nekronata That doesn't make sense. Intelligence and existence are not dependent qualities.
HomleandSecurity 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HomleandSecurity
what a fool you are, you going to start burning witches to ? There is no god
assym2006 7 months ago
@HomleandSecurity For a Religion of love, it seems pretty violent. Can you be more Buddhist and stop hurting people that did nothing to you?
sargentnoob 6 months ago
LSD is a hell of a drug!
tolanplan 1 year ago
I don't like the way he is using the word theory, it should be conjecture to theory.
huntmatuk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
42:00 - ish, the speaker questioning Darwin's
recollection of what his father said
is just a bit too anal-retentive for comfort.
sponsoredwalk1 1 year ago
Comment removed
sponsoredwalk1 1 year ago
lol @ 1:24:16
Are you sure about that? Might want to check your dates again.
Guitcad1 1 year ago 9
@Guitcad1 October 1836
jasonrgrullon2015 1 month ago
people need to leave their ridiculous mystical beliefs in the past. its the fucking 21st century people. I just shake my head when I think about all our advancements in science and technology but most people still believe in something they can't even define and have never seen proof of.
friendtothegays 1 year ago 2
This was awsome! I especially loved the bit about the extreme environments that life thrives in. :) Thankyou.
akrulla 1 year ago
Evolution iz a lie!!! God did it all at de seim time ..... n stuff. Cuz da Baibol sez it so it is tru cos Jesus bacon rally stomatose!!!
Killjeser 1 year ago
@Killjeser Wow, drugs almost make you sound....religious!
thelordmemnoch 1 year ago
It is the Opium of the people ......
Killjeser 1 year ago
@Killjeser Jesus can blow me. He fucking died. He was just a lying son of a bitch and as good as a human, not more.
TheHonestwords 1 year ago
@TheHonestwords LOL, Why so angry? Don't blame Jesus. Blame religion in general.
Killjeser 1 year ago
@Killjeser Well, the subject was about jesus and I found it relevent to curse him. Do u think I wouldn't go off on other messangers of so called God? Don't u think if there is a God who wants to communicate with us, all he had to do was to show up in the sky for the publuc like every 5 years instead of hiding behind the scense for the past millinium or sending his sons through time to kill for him while he was smoking his cigar in a hot tub watching & enjoying the pleasant blood shed he created?
TheHonestwords 1 year ago
@TheHonestwords I totally agree.
Killjeser 1 year ago
@Killjeser Nice. My God is mother earth and my religion is humanity. My God gives life, not death. My religion declares peace, not hatred.
TheHonestwords 1 year ago
The Teaching Company has a great course called Darwinian Revolution which lays out the history prior to the theory & follows it through to modern times. It's very interesting, I didn't know that evolution theories had been around before Darwin & his own grandfather (Erasmus Darwin) had a theory of his own.
KenMacMillan 1 year ago
Eiseley (1959) vigorously promoted the thesis that Edward Blyth had established the theory of evolution by natural selection in 1835 and that Darwin surely had read Blyths paper. The fact is Darwin owned copies of Blyths work, and that these copies have Darwins notes in the margin, Professor George Simpson acknowledged that Darwin was lying. Sorry Stanford but do your homework
petebax1 1 year ago
@petebax1 However, the subsequent discovery of Darwin's notebooks has "permitted the refutation of Eiseley's claims".[12] Both Mayr and Darlington interpret Blyth's view of natural selection as maintaining the type: You're full of shit.
gamesbok 1 year ago
Why the hell do such prestigious universities and scientists in the US continue to give a platform to creationism and other idiocy by arguing against it... its stupid... just ignore it and continue to do science....
Leave debating the creationists and other whack jobs to comedy central!
MumblingMickey 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
4. In Bible, we find two (2) candidates to be called GOD, but atheists are arguing just
with ONE,not with other pretendent.
5. Mostly atheist, are against God's morality and justice
but never refer the same to other candidate: satan.
6. Bible maintans evolution after creation, earth have billions of years etc.
Atheism is a dead concept.
Acmd7 1 year ago
@Acmd7 so what percentage of the world are you, the 40% of Christianity, and then are you the 60% of that *Catholics* or are you orthodox, and even then, are you Lutheran, Baptist, Protestant. How can u think that one specific set of beliefs is right, atheist is the most balanced and logical stand. It doesnt deny god, just says he cant be proved, ESPECIALLY by scriptures
TheElementAll 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God exist! evidences:
1. In Bible we find a lot of prophecies which happened and are happening.
2. If anybody will follow what God asks (ex: praying), everybody will have whatever they (ask)
want (somebody can call it miracles).
3. Blasphemies: if anybody will do it, is puniched very soon and anybody is free to try it,
even right now!
Acmd7 1 year ago
@Acmd7
you are an idiot.
a199215 1 year ago
@Acmd7 so what percentage of the world are you, the 40% of Christianity, and then are you the 60% of that *Catholics* or are you orthodox, and even then, are you Lutheran, Baptist, Protestant. How can u think that one specific set of beliefs is right, atheist is the most balanced and logical stand. It doesn't deny god, just says he cant be proved, ESPECIALLY by scriptures
TheElementAll 1 year ago 3
Finch Birds Awesome For The Win
jmm1233 1 year ago 3
(A) Information is: the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence.
(B) Information exist independent of its medium.
(the same information can be stored in one's mind, expressed verbally, written on paper, typed on a computer etc.)
(C) Code = Language. Language originates in a MIND.
There ore only two types of language known to man: (1) That of human mind origin (2) DNA code.
Information is not matter or energy.
Language is not matter or energy.
Mr88playmaker 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeap. You, retarded, are one of those fanatics blinded bigots. The only luck you have is that the Bible have prophecies for the quality of the man on the last days. People like you. Not only arrogant and stupid, but full of contempt, enemies of God, hateful, jealous, more friends of their pleasures than their creator, a heart lost and in the dark. For this reason, I believe that even the Science shows all the evidence to show how stupid and basic darwin theory is, regardless! nobody will stop
gmidfielder 2 years ago
I am a believer not a christian though, but frankly I dont see why you are bashing up darwin. The astrobiologist pointed out rightly, just like copernicus and galileo was ostracized by ignorants bigots at that time, darwin is being dealth with in the same manner. I dont think darwin theory takes away God's glory, its our myopic understanding which thinks that by accepting evolution somehow we are insulting God, how absurd. I think in 100 years the religious opposition will die out not darwin!
muaztrek 1 year ago 7
@muaztrek Whoa! FINALLY! Great comment! You are the FiRST religious person I respect!
Here's to you, bro!
leesoarez 1 month ago
@muaztrek Sorry to bother you after all this time; I don't usually do this.
"I dont think darwin theory takes away God's glory" True; what it does take away is the core of all Christianity. Evolution (genetics too, but nobody seems to take on it) proves that humanity cannot have originated with 2 people; there is no Adam and Eve. Without them, there is no original sin. Without original sin, Jesus' sacrifice on the cross is meaningless. All of Christianity collapses without the original sin.
StrikaAmaru 2 weeks ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Im pretty sure the darwin's name will be forgotten by the end of the century if not before.
Unless the "Science" becomes a market (already is on that path), and full of complete bigots, who believe on their cult of that damn stupid theory.
gmidfielder 2 years ago
hey stupid jesus freak,
Darwin will be forgotten???? it's u , Xian morons who are going into oblivion. China and India produces tons of engineers and doctors every year. stupid Xians will eliminate themselves from gene pool by not learning science.
einhelios 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the hate against God, so...folks like you would never accept anything that honor the All Mighty.
That's why Intelligent Design is such a threat for retards like you, my friend...ohohoh the more data all Scientists and Institutes gather, the crazier morons like you will become.
gmidfielder 2 years ago
I fear that is wishful thinking friend. :(
EgolandTed 1 year ago
@EgolandTed I wish, mine was wishful thinking.... I got irritated last time... i don't want to see any tradition going into oblivion...
But , when I see all these tea-party, anti-evolution, climate skeptics movements gaining ctrl in US... I fear , I may be right....
einhelios 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Charles Darwin spent his whole time explaining religion. I would like to see him to explain Science.
Science has been always propelled by a theological view. Same case for humanism, a secular theology. The revelation in Biology came in the 50's (genetics), not in darwin.
Darwin is not only pessimistic about human, but for him we are just an accident.
gmidfielder 2 years ago
@gmidfielder Read up on Darwin a bit and you wouldn't have posted such BS.
shallbeagain 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
the more I read, the more pathetic darwin becomes...unbelievable.
what a MORON
gmidfielder 2 years ago
@gmidfielder I notice that you have a lot of insults. So hatefilled for a man of God. What a pity you have no arguement.
gamesbok 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
darwin and his friends go to hell !!!!
esesli261983 2 years ago
lol. it's 2010. wake up.
paradigm667 2 years ago 18
I imagine hell to be an eternity in a room with people like you!
antonyrichardson30 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
a god, and he has created all of us
esesli261983 2 years ago
@esesli261983 Did he create parasitic worms?
gamesbok 1 year ago
thank you for making this available to the public.. it's a good start after decades of scientists thinking they didn't need to confront religions hence hurting the entire nation.
emeralds222 2 years ago
Comment removed
NaziBigBird 2 years ago
Comment removed
NaziBigBird 2 years ago
cool to find this........a lot of hours to go!
go darwin
TeamDarwin1809 2 years ago 2
If only it were that simple.
There's a book called, "How to win the lottery, guaranteed".
Would you then claim that I'm a multi millionaire because I have read that book.
Claiming something to be true isn't evidence, if it were we wouldnt be sitting here as I would surely have been struck down by the wrath of your god many years ago.
MarcusCardiff 2 years ago
Knowing what we do about the universe today, only a madman would say
that there is no God. Man has found that the universe works more accurately
than any clock or watch he has been able to make. And there is no watch
running around that just happened some watchmaker made it. The universe
that is timed more accurately than a watch tells us that there is a
universe-maker. And 150 years ago
the fool begins to appear on the scene.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
@MrAfar11
prove it.
pyr666 1 year ago
i rarther believe darwin than some story that canot be tested
kevinkards1 2 years ago
excelent teachinng
subhoist 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. Where has macro evolution ever been observed? What's the mechanism for getting new complexity such as new vital organs? How, for example, could a caterpillar evolve into a butterfly?
2. Where are the billions of transitional fossils that should be there if your theory is right? Billions! Not a handful of questionable transitions. Why don't we see a reasonably smooth continuum among all living creatures, or in the fossil record, or both?
kingdmculture 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Whatever: answer this: 1. Where has macro evolution ever been observed? What's the mechanism for getting new complexity such as new vital organs? How, for example, could a caterpillar evolve into a butterfly?
2. Where are the billions of transitional fossils that should be there if your theory is right? Billions! Not a handful of questionable transitions. Why don't we see a reasonably smooth continuum among all living creatures, or in the fossil record, or both?
kingdmculture 2 years ago
1. Google: ring species salamanders, top link.
2. Fossils are rare, due to the spesific circumstances required. But we have enough:
watch?v=0puoduvfBxA&feature=PlayList&p=F9729F67CD4034C9&index=2
olasonn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GOD IS GREAT. America has lost its way.
MrTylerBates 2 years ago
such a great place to study at....well...kinda the best
poralentierno 2 years ago
A same family of proteins has the same pace of mutation in different species, that is to say in absolute time, not in a time measured by the succession of generation (which is different for each specie because of its particular lengths of life). Proteins mutate at the same pace whatever the number of generations. Darwin's ideology is dead.
JuliendAnce 2 years ago
the great papa smurf made the universe. papa smurf made you and me. it said so in the big book of smurfs as written down by the prophet greedy.
roninpainbringer 2 years ago
I appreciate this video. And I'm going to comment purely on my appreciation of the video - arguments made here are futile as they do not contribute to anything other than brittle crumbs of the pie. Thanks Stanford!
xzile123 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
D.A.R.W.I.N.'S L.E.G.A.S.Y. = "Despicable Antisemitic Racial Worldview Involved 'Natural Selection's' 'Less-fits' Extermination Goals Aryan Supremacists Yearned"
Acronym77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I put an "S" instead of a "C" in "Legacy". The "C" should stand for "Constantly". Ipso facto, "Aryan" should have an "s" at the end.
Acronym77 2 years ago
A.C.R.O.N.Y.M = "Asshole Creationist Retard Officiously Naming Youtube Masses."
Please go fuck yourself
manhunt48 2 years ago
M.a.n.h.u.n.t.= "Must acronym now have unethical, needless terms?"
R.e.t.a.r.d.= "Retarded evolution theory arguments reject design"
Arguments posited by evolutionists can't have design behind them because the universe is not supposed to be designed, but "Just the appearance" of design. Since evolutionists are a by-product of a universe that is not designed, then that includes their thoughts, minds and arguments. Aren't all these things subsumed under their "non-designed universe"?
Acronym77 2 years ago
well ...
one only can wonder Acronym77 , how on earth did you make it ou of the rubbish bin , as a baby , wasting our time here at U-Tube ?
Please explain , I just wonder mate , ta ... lol
Brgds
GSO
GermanStraight1 2 years ago
THANK YOU so much for posting this its greatly appreciated...
sinongods 2 years ago
My point was not that DNA was not a code. It was that it was not a perfectly designed code that you should expect from a perfect all knowing being. Trust me When humans have the "code" to develop living beings they wont be fragile animals with so many imperfections. We will by nature improve upon the design. Now for a god that can see everything. Youd think he would have predicted this, and perfected us sooner. more to be said in a bit for now i must eat.
mouvement715 2 years ago
Why would you expect God to have a form? You refer to God as a being...why?
cyphi1 2 years ago
Well guess the i suppose it depends on your definition of god. I personally believe that something intangable and beautiful exists in our universe. A type of greater truth or beauty. Too me thats god, but in most of the worlds religions god is personified as having human traits, and emotions. We are made in his image, correct? So by being i mean something that exists, and is aware of its own existence. Something that is sentient. Also anything that exists, has some type of form.
sammusic715 2 years ago
I agree intangible and beautiful. But, I think that we are manglomaniacs to think that we're really made in "his" image. We're just a small part of a living system, a system full of intelligent creatures with specialized traits. All creatures have their own self-defense mechanisms, ours just happens to be contemplation and building things with our hands. This contemplation leads to a desire to try to explain all things...even the unexplainable. Formless, undefinable energy permeates all.
cyphi1 2 years ago
i wasnt making a case for us being made in his image im an athiest. thats the presopostion that christians make. i
sammusic715 2 years ago
I completely agree with dieoxynu.. Further more, Give me one other example of life. Suppose on a different planet "DNA CODE" develops with a completely different chemical make up. Maybe even a different coding structure. Will you make the argument that the same all powerful being went to that planet too and made them in his likeness?
mouvement715 2 years ago
The book Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life is written by Hubert Yockey, the foremost living specialist in bioinformatics. The publisher is Cambridge University press. Yockey rigorously demonstrates that the coding process in DNA is identical to the coding process and mathematical definitions used in Electrical Engineering. This is not subjective, it is not debatable or even controversial. It is a brute fact:
valu777 2 years ago
You can't read, don't pretend to have read a book.
RPFS2008 2 years ago
why do all creatures have 2 eyes ? if its random the creatures should have all numbers of eyes
valu777 2 years ago
First if all, not all creatures have two eyes. Spiders can have as many as eight, for example.
The reason so many have two is because having two eyes makes it easy to judge distances accurately. This ability increases the odds of survival and therefor is strongly favored by natural selection.
Now, you tell me why whales have hip bones.
fileboy2002 2 years ago
i will tell you why because at that way they can have childeren mate, they are holding each other while intercorse my friend
evolution is a big lie
a whale is a whale can not evolve into an seascow or men sure you have 20 differente whales but all are whales 1 species
show me 1 animal how evolved in time
sukruoosten 2 years ago
But they're not holding each other during mating. Whale hip bones are vestigial; they do nothing. They're not even attached to the main skeletal structure at all, but float freely in the torso. Whales have hip bones because, at some point in the past, their ancestors had @#$% LEGS.
fileboy2002 2 years ago
whales have hip bones to walk on land
hahahahahahh 50 to 100 ton whale bones as 2 KG, give me a break there used to mate en grap hold when mating thats obvious
en yes i wont denie he had an ancester mayby a couple thousand years ago it was a WHALE
sukruoosten 2 years ago
kindly explain amblocetus which has been confirmed to be related to the what through comparative anatomy.
your assuming whales where always this size and that the hip bone's original purpose was to act as a mating apparatus, which it was not.
types10001 2 years ago
Whales have hip bones because, at some point in the past, their ancestors had @#$% LEGS.
intresting a whale of 50 to 100 tons
a bone of only couple of KG can let him walk
hahahaahh now thats funny
whale had an ancester youre right about that
it was a WHALE MY FRIEND
not a horse/ape/human/vis/rock/ bold soup 4,6 biljon years ago
no a whale simply a whale ancester !!!!!!!!
sukruoosten 2 years ago
The reason whales are as large as they are is precisely because they returned to the sea. The bouyancy afforded by water allowed whales--some whales--to grow much larger than their land-bound ancestors must have been.
But why would a whale's whale ancestors have hip bones?
fileboy2002 2 years ago
You fail to understand the word anscestor.
eoinroe 2 years ago
You are an idiot and offer zero proof for evolution. Saying that someone doesnt believe as you do just shows your bias. Go ahead educate us poor dumb Christians.The fact is, evolution fails miserably and in this regard there is zero evidence for macroevolution, which is why evolutionists never present any.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
"Saying that someone doesnt believe as you do just shows your bias." That sentence doesn't make much sence, but yes I am bias. Not all Christians are dumb. Macroevolution isn't a term used by the scientific comunity really. The Galapagos islands and places all over the world offer many examples of animals adapting, through natural selection, to their environment. The tortoises and birds there and well basically every plant and animal and fossil on the planet is evidence.
eoinroe 2 years ago
The sentence makes perfect "sense."You keep believing in your fairy tale of outright lies. I stick with real science and empirical truth.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
MrAfar11,
"evolutionists never present any"
I suggest some activities that will cost you no money yet will give you ample evidence about evolution.
1) Go to your closest public library and ask to read Richard Dawkins' "The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution". The title is self explanatory.
2) Please seek the channels of YouTube users AronRa, DonExodus, and C0nc0rdance.
Now you know where to find evidence for "macroevolution".
Question is: Will you look for it?
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago
"evolutionists never present any"
-A fact-
Get to your local Borders or PL and ask to read."God The Evidence" by Patrick Glynn as well as "The collapse of evolution" by Scott M. Huse." The titles say it all.
Also Youtube Ravi Zacharias as well as Patrick Glynn,"The Collapse of Atheism." Now, where is your evidence for evolution.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
MrAfar11,
The evidence for evolution is where it has always been. The sources I mentioned merely collect it. I advise that you read them.
I will in time read your sources.
You make a fundamental mistake, though: "either God or evolution" is a false dichotomy.
Evolution does not affirm or deny the existence of any god.
Evolution does, of course, deny a naively literal reading of Genesis.
However, I am almost certain you do not have a naively literal reading of, say, Mt 5:29-30?
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thats the whole point. There is no evidence for evolution. Your sources collect and redistirbut lies and garbage because they hate God just like yourself.Evolution does not affirm anything because it's as real as a chicken feather plucking ceremony in Rawanda.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
MrAfar11,
I can already see we are talking past each other.
Now please answer: do you still have two hands and two eyes?
If so, why?
Does Jesus not command you to excise them from your body if they lead to sin?
You can say, of course, this is a metaphor.
Why can Genesis not be a metaphor?
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago 2
What the hell are you talking about, and whats this have to do with evolution.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
I think that I speak for all who are either open-minded, free thinking, atheists and others who are interested in the origin of the human race when I say: shut up, listen and learn. Empirical truths is what religion is based on, science works differently.. it takes evidence, composes a theory which can be tested by ANYone (including you).. but if the results are there, it won't be denied.
Your theory of a God, and a man that rises from the dead can't be proven.. proof it, or I won't honor it.
dominice112 2 years ago 3
@dominice112
This is quite interesting point. Question about the God existence should not be a part of a science. But if you need a prove of his presence, tell me please than... do you love your family? I`m think you do. I believe, you do. But can you prove it? Faith is probably the greatest - existing thing in the universe. Without it, civilization we wouldn`t be possible.
extremewalk 2 years ago
@extremewalk
It is borderline insane to state that I must believe because I love my family and friends. It is borderline racist to state that I must be killed or sent to hell (if there is such a thing) if I don't believe in a man in the sky/heavens.
If religion wasn't based on hatred towards others (man, women and children) I might be interested in joining your frat-party.
I have no issues with religion, I have issues with their ever growing fan-clubs based on stories that can't be proven.
dominice112 2 years ago 3
Dont you know that Faith is the Devils Masterpiece.
PlayfulGibbon 2 years ago 26
You Christians ask for evidence then as soon as some is supplied you dismiss it then ask again, more evidence is supplied, same dismissal.
This goes on and on until you turn around and claim that you keep asking for evidence and we are unable to give you any.
Just because you won't open your eyes and accept the overwhelming amounts of evidence out there doesn't mean it is non-existent.
Putting you fingers in your ears and shouting LA LA LA isn't a good enough rebuttal.
MarcusCardiff 2 years ago 4
We would never dismiss real evidence because we believe in science. Evolution is as valid as chicken feather plucking in Nigeria to see what the future holds.Evolution is a lie. A bald faced lie which offers up zero empirical proof and zero support. It'll be dead in 10 years. Science will validate my prediction.Science already has.Just stop using my tax dollars to tell lies.Stop thinking in our schools and I'll stop praying in your backyard.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
MrAfar11,
"Stop thinking in our schools and I'll stop praying in your backyard."
No one in their right mind would say this seriously.
I have to conclude you are a non-Christian trolling as a Christian.
Good one, though. You had me fooled for a while there.
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago
amoxtlacatl,
"I have to conclude you are a non-Christian trolling as a Christian."
I tend do agree with you on this as genuine Christians arent that stupid.
MarcusCardiff 2 years ago
Only a fool would miss the meaning of my statement. You are a fool.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
There is no talking to you, you are obviously being deliberately ignorant.
Like I said, ignoring reality won't make it go away.
From your own bible,
Hear this, you foolish and senseless people, who have eyes but do not see, who have ears but do not hear, Jeremiah 5:21
At least when you die you'll have no senses, it would come as an aweful shock to realised that you had been wrong all this time and there is no heaven waiting for you.
MarcusCardiff 2 years ago 2
Pity the purposfully igmorant. I'll pray for your soul.
MrAfar11 2 years ago
MrAfar11 says:
'We would never dismiss real evidence because we believe in science'
He then says:
'Evolution is a lie. A bald faced lie which offers up zero empirical proof and zero support.'
Obviously you DON'T believe in science. Why not just be honest?
grits011 2 years ago 3
Science isn't about a bunch of people 'believing' in something... is about formulating experiments to probe hypotesis about thing that might become (not for ever) theories'
Deushofito 2 years ago 3
He is quite illiterate. Doesn't even understand some of the words he uses and isn't interested in what anyone has to say on the subject and I imagine goes to Sunday mass every week where he hears some fanatic that tells him, " if you believe in evolution you'll go to hell" so he's terrified of the consequences of evolution. You can only feel sorry.
eoinroe 2 years ago 2
lmao
paradigm667 2 years ago
yep
eoinroe 2 years ago
MrAfar11,
Let me correct my question.
The question is not only "Will you look FOR it?" but also "Will you look AT it?"
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago
Who told you that's random? You have no clue what evolution is and you just proved that. Congratulations!!!!!
aromanro 2 years ago
spiders, flies, wasps think about them. And it's not just random. It's natural selection.
eoinroe 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
explain to me how dumb youre answer is
ancester so you really beleif youre ancester 4,6 biljon years ago was a piece of rock/bacterie
what ever, you atheists should go in show bussenis as comdeians
im really getting a hard laugh about
all youre theories of evolution
that dosnt exist with no proof
suddenly big bang now we are here
not thinking man wit 50 triljon cells very complex it just came from a rock 4,6 biljon years ago
sukruoosten 2 years ago
sukruoosten: "youre ancester 4,6 biljon years ago was a piece of rock/bacterie"
Well.. if you believe 'intelligent design' means an intelligent designer then ralise that an intelligent designer IS an intelligent design and therefor needs and 'intelligent designer' and that intelligent designer is an intelligent design and therefor ... Not sure if the Big Bang IS the cause of us being here but it is clear that an 'intelligent designer' needs a lot more than a "Big Ban" to exist.
kleykenb 2 years ago
You're fucking stupid. You cant even spell and typed right. Just shut your dumbass up.
Bigpimping1b 2 years ago
Read a book on the subject, Sukruoosten. I imagine that you have no interest in maths or science, or that you were never very good at them.
eoinroe 2 years ago
Otherwise the program would crash or not run smoothly and efficiently. While some junk DNA may have a function, some of it is analogous to
the human tail. It is an artifact of evolution left over from a time in which its function was more pronouned.
mouvement715 2 years ago
From Hubert Yockey:
The genetic code has many of the properties of codes in general, specifically the Morse Code, the Universal Product Bar Code, ASCII, and the US Postal Code. I shall explain the relation of these codes to the genetic code in the following discussion. Every code, as the term is used in this book, can be regarded as a channel with an input alphabet A and an output alphabet B.
valu777 2 years ago
have any of you ever heard of junk DNA? DNA is not comparable to the machine language we use to program computers. It contains patterns used build protiens. Thats different than representing boulean logic, or ASCII. WHen programers write programs they dont have junk instructions. Every piece of code is tested and developed with a purpose.
mouvement715 2 years ago
junk dna has now proved that its not junk but very nessesary
valu777 2 years ago
We have far more empirical evidence. as im writing this the speaker is debunky anything you ve said.
sure you have the right to your belief and to voice it but i have the right to call you an idiot.
mouvement715 2 years ago
If you can provide an empirical example of a code or language that occurs naturally (no mind involved), outside the realm of life, outside the realm of DNA. All you need is one example.
otherwise my proof of GODs existance stands
3) Therefore DNA was designed by a mind.
Who is that mind? I wonder if its our creator (you can pray to him he is not far from you)
valu777 2 years ago
Why are you polluting this academic commentary with ridiculous arguments on the existence of deities?
Nature doesn't care about your silly notions- just because you cannot fathom a progression of natural laws that produces something so profound, doesn't mean other people aren't going to try and figure it out.
God is such a silly and crass answer. His commandment: "you shall not think!"
GravityExNihilo 2 years ago 2
Do you ever notice how when you totally debunk their comments, the only thing they come back with is some stupid question asking you to prove a negative? I love these lectures as they can teach me great things, creationists only spew dogma.
jsrail 2 years ago
Which is a right that would be far more accurate for that matter.
Orthrus 2 years ago
what the hell is valu777 talking about, did he listen to this lecture at all........do you realize buddy that your argument about what darwin wrote means nothing because we have far more powerful microscopes now and other ways to test his theory that weren't available to him. like electron microscopes.
mouvement715 2 years ago
Jesus, yielded up the ghost behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying Truly this was the Son of God.
valu777 2 years ago
Biblical zombies. Yay! How could I not believe for so long? Of course the bible is inerrant. If I had known about zombies, I would have believed years ago. Spread the word brother valu777. You are doing Christianity the highest honor by spreading the word. Who could doubt us now?
DogOfTheSpag 2 years ago
Darwin, My Life and Letters Vol. 1, page 210, letter to Mr bentham admits, When we decend into details we can prove that no one species has changed ( i.e. We cannot prove that a single species has changed); nor can we prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the ground work of the theory.
valu777 2 years ago
the first speaker makes me want to punch myself in the face over and over and over until I'm spitting blood all over my laptop keys
deexm 2 years ago
1:00:00 hooray for boobies!!!
pescador1 2 years ago
CREATOR signs his work!
LAMININ GOOGLE IT
BIBLE QUOTE --"All things have been created through him and for him.
He himself existed before anything else did,HE HOLDS all things together."
Wikipedia
Laminin is a protein, also called