Yeah, yeah, send them off to college together and in less than a year she will be calling home saying she is 2 months preggers. So long college, hello assembly line (diaper and manufacturing!)
This is a darned good film -- with a message as fully as applicable today as it was then. After WWII, the average marryin' age for white working- and lower-middle-class women was 19, IIRC, and some got hitched as young as 16 (14 wasn't unheard-of in Appalachia). Middle class+ tended to delay until a couple of years of higher ed were achieved. With less labor-saving gear and old-fashioned notions about putting in 8 for 8's pay, and little social safety net, a young couple could have it tough.
Such a cheesy film, but very very logically correct. They make things so simple and fake, but who am I to talk sense this was in the past not like todays relationships. Same problems different title.
despite this is from the 50's it's spot on. What is the rush to get married when you're young and be married after only a year of engagement?? I agree that longer engagements to figure out the ups and downs of a relationship will end up in a longer marriage. I mean why become in debt from a wedding at the age of 20? Use that money for school, traveling, for being 20!
Well, at least they're telling kids to marry their own race, religion, and social class (in a roundabout kinda way). Even then, I guess they couldn't come right out and say that, no matter how important it really is.
Sue went to State U, met a "James Dean" type of guy while she was there...left Larry and lived life on the wild side...Larry died a lonely, bitter old man! ^_^
@petfaxmachine i was engaged for "5 years" and still married 27 years later......you are right....i think back then people got married at a younger age and did not have long engagements.....probably because of surprise pregnancies
Well she's the one actually taking the thought seriously. Larry, is just staring blankly and the thought isn't really registering--which in and of itself says a lot.
Yeah, yeah, send them off to college together and in less than a year she will be calling home saying she is 2 months preggers. So long college, hello assembly line (diaper and manufacturing!)
Whitney3797 1 month ago
This is a darned good film -- with a message as fully as applicable today as it was then. After WWII, the average marryin' age for white working- and lower-middle-class women was 19, IIRC, and some got hitched as young as 16 (14 wasn't unheard-of in Appalachia). Middle class+ tended to delay until a couple of years of higher ed were achieved. With less labor-saving gear and old-fashioned notions about putting in 8 for 8's pay, and little social safety net, a young couple could have it tough.
50zcarsman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i,m thinking all these videos are actually drug tests for anti-psychotic meds....
reevedavey 2 months ago
these 1950's educational movies are good !
eldar600 2 months ago
wow i like the physiological chart ! something to think about
eldar600 2 months ago
This surprises me, I thought that everyone was for young marriage back then...
gustafsg 8 months ago
I don't think those two have enough BOING....
CarissaXo99 1 year ago 2
In the meantime Larry, use your left hand to make yourself go BOINGGG
junkboxxxxxx 1 year ago 2
These kids are so stupid. I feel embarrassed for them
ThatSmartHotGuy 1 year ago
@ThatSmartHotGuy Did you tell that to your invisible wife?
heavym3tal 4 months ago
Today's relationships suck in comparison, I think they got it right back then.
toyrocketastronaut 1 year ago 4
NOW I SEE ............
fluorescentfrank 1 year ago
Such a cheesy film, but very very logically correct. They make things so simple and fake, but who am I to talk sense this was in the past not like todays relationships. Same problems different title.
eldud00 1 year ago 3
"It doesn't take an engineer to realise we're on the bad side of that graph!" :D
YippieKiAye 1 year ago
despite this is from the 50's it's spot on. What is the rush to get married when you're young and be married after only a year of engagement?? I agree that longer engagements to figure out the ups and downs of a relationship will end up in a longer marriage. I mean why become in debt from a wedding at the age of 20? Use that money for school, traveling, for being 20!
seraphim196 1 year ago 9
@seraphim196 But when I was 20 I didn't do anything except go to the gym. And I don't even do that anymore.
theboombody 1 year ago
Maybe if people actually took it slow nowadays they might actually end up staying married!
kimmariebimmarie 2 years ago 8
"Consider how often you think about yourself, and What *I* Want..." * zoom in on the woman*
nebslie 2 years ago 5
the average marrying age for women was about 20-21 in the 50's
IwillKillYourCereal 2 years ago
Well, at least they're telling kids to marry their own race, religion, and social class (in a roundabout kinda way). Even then, I guess they couldn't come right out and say that, no matter how important it really is.
megaswenson 2 years ago
BOING!
HayateAce 2 years ago 17
I'd only been with my husband for a year and a half before we got married. ...Boing?
nothingisfree 2 years ago 6
those graphs are really scientific!
astroman123 2 years ago 7
ah i miss this values
metalcagirl 2 years ago 2
I'll agree that the idea of longer engagements sounds like a better idea than the "boing" that goes on nowadays.
Salamon2 2 years ago 6
Sue went to State U, met a "James Dean" type of guy while she was there...left Larry and lived life on the wild side...Larry died a lonely, bitter old man! ^_^
MelanieLouM 3 years ago 5
I was engaged for 2.5 years, and I thought that was ridiculously long. I guess that was the norm back then?
petfaxmachine 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@petfaxmachine i was engaged for "5 years" and still married 27 years later......you are right....i think back then people got married at a younger age and did not have long engagements.....probably because of surprise pregnancies
inkey2 10 months ago
notice they zoom in on the girl when mentioning the depersonalization
kwolf002 4 years ago 16
Well she's the one actually taking the thought seriously. Larry, is just staring blankly and the thought isn't really registering--which in and of itself says a lot.
Salamon2 2 years ago 3
@kwolf002 Seriously. Misogynist propaganda anyone?
quoidanslemondequoi 1 year ago