For all 9/11 conspiracy people out there, fuck off. You're not enlightened, you haven't seen the 'truth', you know fuck all. Now show some respects for the people who died that day.
a plane can't bring down a building, even combined with burning jet fuel; if that were the case then the building would have collapsed sideways; instead, it collapsed the SAME EXACT WAY it would have collapsed if detonated by explosives, in this case explosives strong enough to burn through steel; the way that firefighter explained it in the fire station is exactly the way a building comes down via detonation, which was the same way the WTC came down
@bridaks your telling me that the same country who is 14 trillion in debt and can barely handle itself could pull this off? without anything leaking?
It was not just fire that destroyed the buildings. This video does not mention the fact that very large plains impacted them. It was a combination of fire and severe damage to the structure that caused the buildings to collapse.
@TimothyRaymond1 "It was not just fire that destroyed the buildings. This video does not mention the fact that very large plains impacted them. It was a combination of fire and severe damage to the structure that caused the buildings to collapse." - TimothyRaymond1
...Don't forget the Tooth Fairy & the Easter Bunny riding Santa Claus's light-speed sleigh.
Explosions powerful enough to demolish those buildings would have been clearly recored on tape immediately before the collapse from all cameras near the buildings, not just from eyewitnesses. Watch videos of building being demolished with explosives and you'll see how much noise they make. It is also impossible to plant several tons of explosives in those building without anyone noticing.
Apparently a few days before 9/11 there was noise on an empty floor and cameras were temorarily down due to maintenance. Also I do see little explosions happening even in news videos, so somethings fishy, not sure what to believe because I wasn't there. but I can't ignore that the CIA building nicely collapsed too the same way and didn't get hit by a plane.
Statistically Americans are a greater danger to themselves than they are from militant Arabs. Americans kill or wound 30000 fellow Americans every year due to gunshot ( more accurate figures welcome). How can a nation of violent self harmers convince the rest of the world that 9/11 wasn't self inflicted ?
Exactly, a bullet proof jacket is built to protect you from bullets, but if a 50cal sniper hits you then its game over, same as this the building cant cope with the fuel from the plane
Every time I read about this shit I get the feeling that this sad day was the trigger for setting in motion the events that men like Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Cheney, and Mr. Bush Sr. call New World Order. The world will reach a breaking point in which time the UN will step in and begin a consolidation and global control effort. There is nothing any of us can do about it, save prepare. This shit is gonna suck.
Crap, I dont get it... So you say, that you invaded Afghanistan for no reason, killed so many innocent people, lost a lot your own soldiers for no reason? wtf?!
This video proves it, America makes inferior steel/concrete buildings. We shouldnt make steel concrete buildings anymore because they fall due to fire.
Where do you see ANY FIRES at 8:38 SILLYDILDO? There's not 1 fire in sight unless you are talking about the EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE ASSHOLE.
Fucktards wouldn't know a murder if i was shoving a knife into your chest right in front of your face..LOSER fuck off & go back to your video games asswipe.You wouldn't know proof if i shoved it down your throat PUNK. lol loser
Ok, so the building didn't collapse because of fire. It collapsed due to the several impacted floor's sudden movement from melting and bending beams, setting up the domino effect. End of fucking story.
Hey, listen man. The building collapsed because the spot on top of the plane gave way, fell about 5 stories, then landed onto the bottom part. Thats enough to take down fucking Superman
uuuumm........... FUCKING DUMBASSES, i'm pretty sure that a MOTHER FUCKING PLANE CRASHED INTO THAT BUILDING CAUSING THE STRUCTURE TO CRUMBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i'll tell who did this to our country. FUCKING TERRORISTS ON A BIG ASS PLANE!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK ALL YOU PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS WAS A CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@austin81994 Go fuck yourself. Fact= The twin towers were designed to take multiple impacts of 747's, Which is the biggest plane built at the time the twin towers were built.
@davisbad000 ummmmmmm............. noooo. ur horny for your mother. try questioning the millions of people who were there at the time and somehow managed to see some mysterious ghost plane fly into the fucking buildings.
ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay U GAY
It was our government's doing for whatever reason. Think about it... Why would the twin towers be an important target... what is the name of the area the twin towers were at. The Financial District. You ppl who believe the crap the media tells you are idiots.
@Kal824 Yea and did you come up with the theory that it was the government's fault, or did you just believe some story on the internet. you are an idiot for falling for dumb shit. U GAY
Because America is such a perfect country... like we wouldnt beat our neighbor in the head to take his wife and home. Listen to what the narrator is saying. She's explaining that a buliding big or small made of steel cannot collapse due to fire.
I know its hard to beleive. Its shocking but it wasnt just the planes that braught down the buildings I promise you. There was even a 3rd building that most people dont know about. Its called building 7. This building was not hit by a plane and also collapsed leaving the same MOLTEN metal at the base that building 1 and 2 also have. MOLTEN metal pools at teh bottom. End result of thermade reaction.
good. I hope it does, thats what he gets for blowing up his buildings or the very least keeping silent. Its a disgrace to all the people who were murdered by evil men.
and by the way hes not planning on rebuilding them. He plans on building something different and why its going to cost more. He kind of failed in court cause he wanted 7 billion for insurance since he says they were 2 seperate attacks, but the court rules aginst him and he only got 4 billion. Great to see how we talk about money when many people have lost their lives for this evil act.
wow the guy owned all three buildings had really bad luck or good luck. All three of his WTC collapsed into piles of dust and metal dust LOL! And he made billions from the recent insurance policy he baught covering specificall "terrorist attacks."
@TheTylershea "a plane cut right through the steel taking out all of the support "
aluminum slices steel??? this was the oddest part of the whole story for me. That and Atta's passport was found unscathed some three blocks away. As a true marine, you should be concerned about the fascist take-over of your country.
@nobraintheory you should learn about physics, or metal fabrication. The law of inertia does not care which object is moving. And water jets work by pressurizing the water until it is denser than the object to be cut, and when cutting steel they add abrasives. Nice try Skippy. you have the right handle, with that theory!
the abrasives added to h2o jets includes sand but is not limited to, many far more dense substrates are added, depending on application. water molecules line up very tight, you are mistaken on the density of water. Water has anomalous properties, one of which is it gets less dense in solid form.
you are the one making assumptions, from 911 to my occupation, you are mistaken
@nobraintheory the wings of the zero did not leave cookie cutter holes through the vessel. I can't believe you use this as an example, what are you cheney's kid? You inherited the "dick" part.
How many gallons of burning crude were on that rig? LOTS! Contained oil exploding dropped that rig, fool.
The professional estimates of the 911 fireballs show more fuel burned on the initial explosion than the planes could carry. And right on raytheon's floor?? and the pentagon? right into the portion of the building with enrons investigation!
I hear they took "gullible" out of the dictionary! just as they took "democracy" from America's description.
@nobraintheory well if it is it ain't mine but the work of professional physicists and architects. I take their word on it, plus the second plane was in the air for considerably longer yet very similar sized explosion. Focus on that not any other points I have made.
typical disinfo operations. look up the 25 rules! If you are denying any strange events that day, or on 7/7/7 you are seriously gullible. there are monster lists on the 'net. and many real oddities, not all are crackpot theories.
"well if it is it ain't mine but the work of professional physicists and architects."
What?? I love how you just say things with no proof. The majority of physicists and engineers DO NOT SUPPORT THE NO PLANE THEORY. THAT IS A LIE. If it's not, prove it.
"in the air for considerably longer yet very similar sized explosion."
How do you know? There is no video of the first impact's explosion. Yet another lie.
@nobraintheory again with the no plane shit! Where, once, do I say anything about no planes? You are a shill, supporting the lie, and using weak arguing skills to do so.
This video is titled "STEEL BUILDINGS DON'T COLLAPSE FROM FIRE" is it not?
Many reports of ground level explosions, melted steel and nanothermate found in the dust. you are a weasel. You have "no planes" up your ass.
.... and as for the oil rig, the contained oil exploded destroying the supports, again fire did not take it down either. Unless you say the fire caused the explosion. weak....try a little reading, "logical self-defense" for starters. At least then you could debate a little more logically. Putting words in peoples mouth is a sure way to put your foot in your own.
@NOmeansnoFAN " do I say anything about no planes?"
Maybe you should tell me specifically what you think hit the tower so I can better understand why you ramble on like you do. You're the one making the claim that what is conventionally known about 9/11 is false, so the burden of proof is yours. Where is any evidence to support your silly claims?
@nobraintheory well no brain, lay out what you need explanation of here. Atta's magic passport? The complete lack of video from the pentagon...86 different cameras filmed the event, yet 3 frames released. The many, many irregularities and mountains of circumstantial evidence surrounding these events?
To answer your question: by all accounts it appears to me that missiles hit the buildings. Look up the definition of missile and you will see i am not contradicting myself. They were planes.
flown by Saudi nationals. This event was used to sequester the middle east. Either the "powers that be" aided this event, which I think is true, or allowed it to happen. The put option issue ALONE should make you cringe!!! Let alone not a single Israeli national was killed in the towers, yet every other country had at least one. The core could not have given way like it did without further assistance.
snopes as a reference? thats worse that using wiki. AA had put options against themselves ffs! 600% increase days before? snopes away that! was not all done by one trader.
I do not need to cite anything to you, if you really gave a shit you would see it yourself, proof of circumstantial evidence? it wouldn't be circumstantial. What do i state that you need referencing for? As i stated any facts i have stated there is proof of....so?
The information is clearly sourced, but you probably didn't read it anyway. Hey, it's a far cry from pravda, which evidently you think is a credible news source.
"I do not need to cite anything to you"
Then why claim that you 'have proof for everything you're stating?'
@nobraintheory OMFG you are an idiot. Have you even looked into this stuff? The Naudet brother's film and one other. check 0:24 here /watch?v=Ys41jnL2Elk
Big orange thing , I believe that is an explosion from what appears to be a plane hitting a building. NOT ONCE HAVE I STATED ANYTHING ABOUT NO PLANES! You are following the 25 rules to the letter you pathetic fucking troll,
actually the box girders on the outside of wtc would be MORE DENSE. There were two sides that would be perpendicular to the wing! i know what you meant but ships are solid steel now? where do the sea men live?
" actually the box girders on the outside of wtc would be MORE DENSE."
More dense than what?
Ok, let's spell it out. You're telling me that a 350,000lb plane made of aluminum alloy, steel, titanium, etc., going 500mph doesn't have enough force to break 3/16 inch steel box columns?
@nobraintheory the ship! rereading the comment I left it is obvious, but I wrote it...I guess. a sheet of cardboard vs a box? get it?
Look up eye witness Rick Siegel and the helicopters in the plume of smoke!
And go bug someone else for a while, i see you have quite a few convos going on right now. Are you getting paid for this?Plane wings have signs all over them "NO STEP" why is that? There is one pic of a column cut by the tip of the wing, very odd indeed. and where is your rebut on the core?
You're telling me that a 350,000lb plane made of aluminum alloy, steel, titanium, etc., going 500mph doesn't have enough force to break 3/16 inch steel box columns?
"And go bug someone else for a while"
If you don't want to continue, don't. Don't worry about me, I'm a grown ass man and I do what I want.
You with the IDF? NSA? how do you sleep? The more I look for links for you the more I am finding solid fishy shit about this false flag event.
You boys really have your work cut out for you! Must be a full time position you have here! THE CORE? come on you can't buy that pancake shit! NIST doesn't why do you?
@nobraintheory the burden of proof lays with the one making the claim, The 911 Commission is the claim...with no proof! Doesn't address the "core" issue.
@NOmeansnoFAN "the burden of proof lays with the one making the claim, The 911 Commission is the claim...with no proof! Doesn't address the "core" issue."
You silly twoofers just don't get it. If you can't understand the simple concept of the burden of proof, and you choose to ignore the mountains of evidence that directly contradict your silly theory (which you won't even state), then nothing can help you. Have fun fixing people's toilets.
"again with the fake plane shit? why do you constantly do this???"
Because you're dancing on the fence and won't take a stand. You claim that the plane couldn't penetrate, the videos are faked, etc., but you won't take a stand as to what you think happened. If you don't have a theory, you can't be proven wrong.
"I showed you that video for proof of fakery in the videos. Not in the planes." What, then, was faked.
@nobraintheory oooo so good. you should take this routine on the road. could you blther on with more misdirected ire and red herring arguments? typical retort from "your type" fyi I am a refrigeration mechanic. call me if you are building a hockey rink or cold storage, or like beer at 1 degree c
@NOmeansnoFAN let me ask you no im no steel technician nor can i spell hahaha but wouldnt a fire with jet engine fuel weaken the steel. and a plane flying in at that speed that is that heavy plus the burning fuel and heat would i believe weaken the structure dont you think then as the loads from the top push down on it it could cause it to collaspe, but hey everyone has their thoughts
Ok.......American Airlines flight 11 hit 1 world trade center at 8:46 am. The impact zone was between the 93rd and 99th floors.
United Airlines flight 175 hit 2 world trade center at 9:03 am. The impact zone was between the 77th and 85th floors.
sooo how the hell(even if steel is weakend) does the steel core column below the impact zones give up?There wasn't so hot down there.and for the whole building to get down the bottom floor columns had to be melted
Steel melts at 1525° C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825° C, it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C, at 825°C the steel beams would have lost about 63.66% of it's strength combined with the silicon components of the electrical systems inside the building who explode and deliver a higher ammount of heat than jet fuel would be enough to make the towers drop.
I am not here to argue. Someone said that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to make steel collapse, I say it does. I cannot argue with any of those who call themselves "truthers" because they are not skeptics, a skeptic demands to be challenged and to be convinced otherwise but no amount of reasoning or proof will convince any of them otherwise. They are fanatics and agenda driven, trying to have a discussion with any of the would be like kicking water up a hill.
hect even if u weaken it- note ONLY a few places would b weakened & it would b weakened ASYMMETRICALLY! this means it would cause only a gradual tilt & slag over time from heat transfer. Note; heat transfer requires time to accomplish- hence why u can walk across hot coals & not get burned(c Mythbusters)
fire causes gradual assymetric damage&slagging. So even if u hav a 'partial collapse', the bottom like 80-90 stories ought to hav more than enough support
to hold a couple softened stories. Hect its been able to do so for like 30 years! go watch this simple physics explanation; (note: when watching, please keep in mind the laws of conservation of energy&momentum as well as newton's 3 laws of motion. To deny or misunderstand any of these laws is not only faulty but shows great incompetence)
but jet fuel is explosive, hence the fire ball at the begining, its not like the jet fuel laid in the building and burned the whole time, it burned up in a matter of 20 seconds, all of it
I can see where you're going with this so let me clarify one thing for you, I don't care if it did or did not cause the towers to drop. I couldn't care less about what people think of 9/11, the "Truthers" stupid theories and the idiotic reports that the government spews out every week. All I am saying is that from a physics point of view, jet fuel and the massive amounts of silicon elements in the buildings COULD be hot enough to make the towers fall. Key word here is COULD.
That woman standing in the plane impact hole, waving at the helicopter, must have been one of those 9/11 "twoofers" who hate America. If she had been a good citizen she would have supported our President in time of war by catching on fire and jumping to escape the intense flames as they weakened the steel.
@CriSoldier super thermite is a powder when ignited, reaches extreme temp. the temp. the thermite was in the girders, also, the heat it makes, is mostly isolated to itself
Little history lession, for thousands of years, blacksmiths were able to manipulated iron and steel not by melting and casting it but by heating it to the point at which it softened so they could hammer it into various shapes.
Besides, its not like the plains doing a Kamikaze attack would have weakend the structure.
hahahaha the average idiot might buy that load of horse shit but your theory is missing something. care to inform the kids how a blacksmith was able to get the stronger metals hot enough to shape them. maybe you cant tell the class about the use and "need" of the diaphragm pump.
structural steel is an alloy mixed for strength and office fires with jet fuel didn't get hot enough to cause global failure of all support structure and symmetrical collapse at near free fall speed.
So, its the old Jet fuel cant melt steel, eh? Try reading about the Mont Blanc Tunnel (between Italy and France) Fire in March of 1999. A tanker of margarine caught fire in a tunnel and melted everything inside. Cars were turned into puddles of molten metal. The combustion temperature of vegetable oil is much less than kerosene (jet fuel). Trap enough fuel in a tight space and provide enough air and it can melt mountainside tunnels, twin towers or even stupid theories about 911.
b4sythe:"... margarine caught fire ... Cars were turned into puddles of molten metal.The combustion temperature of vegetable oil is much less than kerosene (jet fuel)."
Duhhh, then we should stop using kerosene heaters?
here is an interesting question if you are capable of doing elementary school math:
per square yard of office floor space of WTC 1 (excluding core column area) how much kerosene/jet fuel from jet?
what is single word to describe somebody disconnected from reality?
bIZAROsPRMN11, this has nothing to do with your heater. We are talking about whether the towers collapse was caused by conceivable scientific circumstances or whether it has to be an inside job; there is a pretty big difference. You should stop heating your home with yak dung, or at least open a window. The fresh air may help you practice elementary English and ask coherent questions (excluding your attempts to sound scientific or comprehensive) or provide rational answers.
The front runner for a single word to describe somebody (that is) disconnected from reality is: bIZAROsPRMN11. Can you make a point without stating obvious things, like 'engineers use science'? There's no conspiracy in my reply, it's just YouTube dude! This site notifies its users when a post is replied to. Are you that desperate to believe you're in on something BIG. Ha! I guess I am guilty of stating some obvious things as well, trying (in vain) to keep you on track. I quit, enjoy your view.
None of those other buildings have the weight of 74 floors and 40 tons of jet fuel that the WTC had on 911. You do not have to melt the steel for it to fall, all that must be done is to soften it enough to weaken, which is about 1,100 degrees which is 700 degrees below the melting point of 1,800 degrees. Any person who felt even 400 degree heat for more than 2 minutes close up is DEAD.
So explain how people were seen waving from the holes created by the airplanes up to an hour after the crash. google edna citron she is the most prominently photographed of these poor people. put 2 and 2 together here please
The twin towers were 110 stories tall. Steel actually loses much of it's structural strength at around 700-800 deg. Steel beams will also elongate as they heat up, causing collapses. Check out Francis L. Brannigan's Building Construction for the Fire Service. The voice in the video is wrong (or willfully ignoring volumes of contradicting data)- Steel buildings can and DO collapse as a result of fire.
they said the collapse was caused by gravity?those towers peeled back like a bannana in ten seconds..never mind the fact that 110 floors each containing one acre of concrete vaporized in ten secs..what force could do that?it surely cannot be gravity
@CREDITS4CARBON You're am idiot if you believe that. Do your research. Pick up a science book and read. I'm sure all that time you spent " researching" this info was time less spent than watching porn... No matter how soft steel would get, it would not cause an entire building to collapse within itself as the towers did. Its Physics... Try playing Jenga... and pick from close to the middle and you'll see what I mean.
Stupid videos like this is what causes consperiacy theroist to run rampant. Jet fuel burns hotter such as kerosene does. its why kerosene is used in heaters and not gasoline. the hotter the fire the more chance steel or any metal will weaken. i do not beleive the steel melted but rather was somehow "untempered" causing a structual failure.
if thats true you have to wonder why your kerosene heater wouldnt melt after one hour like the WTC did. Too bad molten steel was found under 3 buildings in NYC and jet fuel or kerosene cannot get near that temperature in an open-air burn.
Impact is one way. Just because a portion of the building wasn't directly involved in the crash, doesn't mean it isn't effected. Who knows what damage was done to remote elements of the structure by the crashes and resulting shift in load?? We'll probably never know as they collapsed shortly thereafter. Steel actually loses much of it's strength at around 700 deg F. It also elongates- causing all sorts of problems-pushing outward on walls, or buckling if it cannot push.
Anyone that believes this is really what happened is brainwashed by the leftist media propaganda bullshit. The essentials of firefighting book that every fireman in training gets when they start will tell you "A 50 foot length of steel when heated to 1000 degrees F will expand up to 4 inches in length." For every 50 feet add 4 inches. And building construction will also tell you floors have a weight limit. I used work on planes. A 757 weighs approx. 80,000 pounds. Do the math!!!
If it was molten steel. Meaning it was liquid it would have found its own leveling point like all liquids do. I have never been to the world trade center site, but if trde center 7 is downstream from the towers the liquid would have ran that way. I do not agree with everything President Bush has said or done, but the blame lies during the Clinton era. If we weren't wasting money and time on Whitewater or blow job gate we may have stopped this terrible tradgedy that was caused by extremist.
fireman you really sound dumb, you make it sound like it was a volcano going on, a stream of moten brought down trade 7?? come on how old are you, people that believe bush either just want to for the sake of it, or is just really dumb.
The molten metal from the two towers came together united down below in the basements and made a plan. The molten metal thought, that this 9/11 event just really needed a conspiracy theory, so, a portion of it floated over to the WTC 7 basement, and then we are here today!!!
@fireman73386 So you dont think your brainwashed by the Dich Chenney propaganda? yeah right. so how do you explain that every other steel frame structured building has never collapsed due office to fires? how did the "jet fuel" weaken the steel in the bottom floors? it didnt. how do you explain the molten pools of nano-thermite that burned for months after that attacks? do you think that was jet fuel burning for months on end. the only way those buildiongs came down was explosives.
@MCHESTER29 "how did the "jet fuel" weaken the steel in the bottom floors?"
The collapse started from the top, you ignorant dipshit. How did the oil platform off of Louisiana just collapse? Fire. Steel structure collapsed by fire.
"the only way those buildiongs came down was explosives."
They must have been magic invisible soundless explosives that leave no trace. Nano Thermite is not an explosive.
@MCHESTER29 - What? Why don't you mention the oil rig, or the lack of explosives evidence, or the collapse starting from the top, or the fact that it would take tons of nano thermite to bring down the towers, or the fact that nano thermite has NEVER been used to demo a building?
fire didnt melt the towers metal, but it weakened it, and plus the fact that the towers were about 10 times bigger then any other buildings, the weight on the weakened metal is wut made it fall, look it up. scientifically provan
okay well they used the whole video talking about how steel buildings can withstand fire... but of course it wasnt ONLY fire. a plane went through it remember?? that could do something to the structural stability of the building
There was no damage to the structure..how could a hollow aluminum tube made of riveted sheets of light metal damage the steel core and exterior which is infinitely stronger?
okay well the plane probably weighs around 50 tons, and its going over 300mph (probably) straight into a building. it doesnt make a bit of sense if you think that it wouldnt have done any damage.
your 9-11 conspiracy theories are crazy and with no proof. that is like saying ufo's crashed at roswell. with over 5000 photos taken of the towers after they came down no plasting or demolition signs were ever found.
Well, I think a decient portion of us are sceptical of the fires. In the event of the south tower, most of the fuel was eaten in the fireball. After the jet fuel was consumed, we would of had a normal high-ruse building...and I'd be willing to bet there was a crossbreeze. That would defenitely tone the temerature of the fire down. Agreed?
No- it does the exact opposite. the winds fan the flames like a bellows at a forge- making them burn HOTTER. The other fact all these conspiracy videos ignore, is that it only takes 500 degreesF to make steel lose it's strength. This is WELL within the temp range of a normal structure fire. The steel beams didn't melt, they failed when they got hot enough to lose their structural strength.
Really, so cross ventiation would make the fires worse? Then what were they thinking when they installed the 'purge mode' in the tower's ventilation system? It blow freash cool air into the fire affected area and removed the smoke according to many sites.
To remove smoke and heat. Traditional ventilation techniques don't work for high rise buildings, because of the wind. The "purge mode" is positive pressure ventilation- it allows you to exhaust smoke and heat, to make conditions more tenable for life. This needs to be carefully controlled- to avoid fanning the fire.
Oh...and just for the record, Sturctural Steel hits 60% strength at 550C (1022F). Also, even if the fireproofing was removed and the steel lost most of its room temperature strength, the cool concrete will keep things stable. If that isn't true, then these things should of come down in 1975.
it only takes a few seconds to melt steel, i do it every day at work with the help of acetylene(gas) and ... get this folks ...OXYGEN. only takes a few seconds. you are talking about tons and tons of fuel funning down the core which would act as a giant air shaft feeding the fuel just like a common blow torch. with the core melting the floor joists would cave in. and there was much more than concrete and steel an these floors. carpet, drop ceilings tons of plastic.
For all 9/11 conspiracy people out there, fuck off. You're not enlightened, you haven't seen the 'truth', you know fuck all. Now show some respects for the people who died that day.
metallicadyerseve 4 months ago
a plane can't bring down a building, even combined with burning jet fuel; if that were the case then the building would have collapsed sideways; instead, it collapsed the SAME EXACT WAY it would have collapsed if detonated by explosives, in this case explosives strong enough to burn through steel; the way that firefighter explained it in the fire station is exactly the way a building comes down via detonation, which was the same way the WTC came down
Tirius9393 7 months ago
They blinded us for a while but we are awakened to the truth of this inside job now.
It was a very complex operation that required hundreds of people to accomplish
We have all the required evidence to prosecute but naturally we are lacking the Judicial Power to take those responsible to Court and than to Jail.
The people need to take their Country back into their hands and Demand accountability for what was done and still being done worldwide.
Wake up to their lies friends.
Love&Light
bridaks 7 months ago
@bridaks your telling me that the same country who is 14 trillion in debt and can barely handle itself could pull this off? without anything leaking?
TheTylershea 5 months ago
@TheTylershea Whitout anything leaking ?? you are a moron it's leaking all over the place lol you are a tard monkey.
smashu2 3 months ago
@iEatYourSandviches jet fuel does not burn at even half those temperatures
KatieCosmicessence 7 months ago
It was not just fire that destroyed the buildings. This video does not mention the fact that very large plains impacted them. It was a combination of fire and severe damage to the structure that caused the buildings to collapse.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
Comment removed
AmericanGhoul 6 months ago
@TimothyRaymond1 "It was not just fire that destroyed the buildings. This video does not mention the fact that very large plains impacted them. It was a combination of fire and severe damage to the structure that caused the buildings to collapse." - TimothyRaymond1
...Don't forget the Tooth Fairy & the Easter Bunny riding Santa Claus's light-speed sleigh.
AmericanGhoul 6 months ago
Explosions powerful enough to demolish those buildings would have been clearly recored on tape immediately before the collapse from all cameras near the buildings, not just from eyewitnesses. Watch videos of building being demolished with explosives and you'll see how much noise they make. It is also impossible to plant several tons of explosives in those building without anyone noticing.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
@TimothyRaymond1
Apparently a few days before 9/11 there was noise on an empty floor and cameras were temorarily down due to maintenance. Also I do see little explosions happening even in news videos, so somethings fishy, not sure what to believe because I wasn't there. but I can't ignore that the CIA building nicely collapsed too the same way and didn't get hit by a plane.
cher716 3 months ago
Statistically Americans are a greater danger to themselves than they are from militant Arabs. Americans kill or wound 30000 fellow Americans every year due to gunshot ( more accurate figures welcome). How can a nation of violent self harmers convince the rest of the world that 9/11 wasn't self inflicted ?
modelparent 7 months ago
it just seems odd that they would both fall the same way within minutes from hits from different angles.
bizel78 9 months ago
@iEatYourSandviches
Exactly, a bullet proof jacket is built to protect you from bullets, but if a 50cal sniper hits you then its game over, same as this the building cant cope with the fuel from the plane
Predinator2k7 9 months ago
Comment removed
gingerkirst 9 months ago
Every time I read about this shit I get the feeling that this sad day was the trigger for setting in motion the events that men like Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Cheney, and Mr. Bush Sr. call New World Order. The world will reach a breaking point in which time the UN will step in and begin a consolidation and global control effort. There is nothing any of us can do about it, save prepare. This shit is gonna suck.
Sailor1010 9 months ago
Crap, I dont get it... So you say, that you invaded Afghanistan for no reason, killed so many innocent people, lost a lot your own soldiers for no reason? wtf?!
zippyLTU 1 year ago
Funny how ALL my comments were deleted from this film in the last 2 weeks.
911 is that YOU doing it?
cadu1995 1 year ago
This video proves it, America makes inferior steel/concrete buildings. We shouldnt make steel concrete buildings anymore because they fall due to fire.
Chaz2096 1 year ago 2
In a small talk ...israel the main problem.
idriss0007 1 year ago
8:38 small, scattered fires? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FUCK YOU, TRUTHERS!!!! KILL YOURSELVES.
sillydillydokieo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sillydillydildo small, scattered fires? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FUCK YOU, TRUTHERS!!!! KILL YOURSELVES.
Where do you see ANY FIRES at 8:38 SILLYDILDO? There's not 1 fire in sight unless you are talking about the EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE ASSHOLE.
Fucktards wouldn't know a murder if i was shoving a knife into your chest right in front of your face..LOSER fuck off & go back to your video games asswipe.You wouldn't know proof if i shoved it down your throat PUNK. lol loser
cadu1995 1 year ago
Ok, so the building didn't collapse because of fire. It collapsed due to the several impacted floor's sudden movement from melting and bending beams, setting up the domino effect. End of fucking story.
flipwiggins 1 year ago
wasnt these buildings hit by planes ?
just wondering
LongMoneyTrey 1 year ago
not 1 of those buildings got hit by a plane either
6afraidof7hellno 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@6afraidof7hellno - "not 1 of those buildings got hit by a plane either"
Yeah, the buildings weren't even there, they were holograms! And everyone knows the pentagon was made of marshmallows.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
Hey, listen man. The building collapsed because the spot on top of the plane gave way, fell about 5 stories, then landed onto the bottom part. Thats enough to take down fucking Superman
Gammerman12 1 year ago
@Gammerman12 put the bong down and get real
zip68 1 year ago
9/11 conspiracists are stupid as fuck. no science behind their crazy ideals.
SpartQ77 1 year ago
uuuumm........... FUCKING DUMBASSES, i'm pretty sure that a MOTHER FUCKING PLANE CRASHED INTO THAT BUILDING CAUSING THE STRUCTURE TO CRUMBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i'll tell who did this to our country. FUCKING TERRORISTS ON A BIG ASS PLANE!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK ALL YOU PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS WAS A CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
austin81994 1 year ago
@austin81994 Go fuck yourself. Fact= The twin towers were designed to take multiple impacts of 747's, Which is the biggest plane built at the time the twin towers were built.
davisbad000 1 year ago
@davisbad000 ummmmmmm............. noooo. ur horny for your mother. try questioning the millions of people who were there at the time and somehow managed to see some mysterious ghost plane fly into the fucking buildings.
ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay ur gay U GAY
austin81994 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@davisbad000 - "Fact= The twin towers were designed to take multiple impacts of 747's"
Actually, 707s, but since when has the truth movement been interest in truth?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
Bush and Cheney are some crooked bastards!
MClown69 1 year ago
It was our government's doing for whatever reason. Think about it... Why would the twin towers be an important target... what is the name of the area the twin towers were at. The Financial District. You ppl who believe the crap the media tells you are idiots.
Kal824 1 year ago
@Kal824 Yea and did you come up with the theory that it was the government's fault, or did you just believe some story on the internet. you are an idiot for falling for dumb shit. U GAY
austin81994 1 year ago
Because America is such a perfect country... like we wouldnt beat our neighbor in the head to take his wife and home. Listen to what the narrator is saying. She's explaining that a buliding big or small made of steel cannot collapse due to fire.
Kal824 1 year ago
@Kal824 -
"She's explaining that a buliding big or small made of steel cannot collapse due to fire. "
She's wrong. What about the steel oil rig in the gulf that collapsed due to fire?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
hahaha please... a plane cut right through the steel taking out all of the support the rest of the building is pretty heavy...
wack job left wing people get a life and a job..
Semper FI
TheTylershea 1 year ago
I used to be on your side until 5 days ago.
I know its hard to beleive. Its shocking but it wasnt just the planes that braught down the buildings I promise you. There was even a 3rd building that most people dont know about. Its called building 7. This building was not hit by a plane and also collapsed leaving the same MOLTEN metal at the base that building 1 and 2 also have. MOLTEN metal pools at teh bottom. End result of thermade reaction.
Origin305 1 year ago
it was hit by the beams from wtc the diesel pipes for the emergency lighting ruptured and the NYFD knew it was going to collapse
Obelisk2290 1 year ago
@Obelisk2290
u are joking right? hahah good one
Origin305 1 year ago
its going to cost about a billion to rebuild he will lose money
Obelisk2290 1 year ago
@Obelisk2290
good. I hope it does, thats what he gets for blowing up his buildings or the very least keeping silent. Its a disgrace to all the people who were murdered by evil men.
Origin305 1 year ago
@Obelisk2290
and by the way hes not planning on rebuilding them. He plans on building something different and why its going to cost more. He kind of failed in court cause he wanted 7 billion for insurance since he says they were 2 seperate attacks, but the court rules aginst him and he only got 4 billion. Great to see how we talk about money when many people have lost their lives for this evil act.
Origin305 1 year ago
@Origin305 well 4.6 billion to be exact! whats $600 million between friends
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@Obelisk2290
wow the guy owned all three buildings had really bad luck or good luck. All three of his WTC collapsed into piles of dust and metal dust LOL! And he made billions from the recent insurance policy he baught covering specificall "terrorist attacks."
Origin305 1 year ago
@TheTylershea "a plane cut right through the steel taking out all of the support "
aluminum slices steel??? this was the oddest part of the whole story for me. That and Atta's passport was found unscathed some three blocks away. As a true marine, you should be concerned about the fascist take-over of your country.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN well said
MCHESTER29 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN "aluminum slices steel???"
Dude, you can cut steel with WATER. It's all about momentum.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory you should learn about physics, or metal fabrication. The law of inertia does not care which object is moving. And water jets work by pressurizing the water until it is denser than the object to be cut, and when cutting steel they add abrasives. Nice try Skippy. you have the right handle, with that theory!
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN "you should learn about physics"
Riiiiight... More no planer physics. I love it when fast food workers moonlight as physicists.
"pressurizing the water until it is denser than the object to be cut"
They pressurize the water to get SPEED. The water is still water. It is still less dense than steel.
"cutting steel they add abrasives."
Sand. Also less dense than steel.
Check out the USS Hinsdale, and tell me how an aluminum Zero went through the solid steel side.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory well ,for one I am not a "no planer" as you put it.
The zero in the USS Hinsdale was half out of the ship. it did not disappear into the vessel, like did the 757's into the buildings.
The pbs documentary on the towers falling had a cgi of the pancake theory. Notice the core columns in this video?
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
the abrasives added to h2o jets includes sand but is not limited to, many far more dense substrates are added, depending on application. water molecules line up very tight, you are mistaken on the density of water. Water has anomalous properties, one of which is it gets less dense in solid form.
you are the one making assumptions, from 911 to my occupation, you are mistaken
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN - "for one I am not a "no planer" as you put it. "
Then what's your argument?
"many far more dense substrates are added"
More dense than steel? No.
"water molecules line up very tight, you are mistaken on the density of water."
Blah blah blah. Water is less dense than steel, the speed allows it to penetrate.
"you are the one making assumptions"
No, I'm the one with EVIDENCE on my side, your side has NO EVIDENCE.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory the wings of the zero did not leave cookie cutter holes through the vessel. I can't believe you use this as an example, what are you cheney's kid? You inherited the "dick" part.
How many gallons of burning crude were on that rig? LOTS! Contained oil exploding dropped that rig, fool.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
The professional estimates of the 911 fireballs show more fuel burned on the initial explosion than the planes could carry. And right on raytheon's floor?? and the pentagon? right into the portion of the building with enrons investigation!
I hear they took "gullible" out of the dictionary! just as they took "democracy" from America's description.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN
" The professional estimates of the 911 fireballs show more fuel burned on the initial explosion than the planes could carry."
That's a lie.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory well if it is it ain't mine but the work of professional physicists and architects. I take their word on it, plus the second plane was in the air for considerably longer yet very similar sized explosion. Focus on that not any other points I have made.
typical disinfo operations. look up the 25 rules! If you are denying any strange events that day, or on 7/7/7 you are seriously gullible. there are monster lists on the 'net. and many real oddities, not all are crackpot theories.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN -
"well if it is it ain't mine but the work of professional physicists and architects."
What?? I love how you just say things with no proof. The majority of physicists and engineers DO NOT SUPPORT THE NO PLANE THEORY. THAT IS A LIE. If it's not, prove it.
"in the air for considerably longer yet very similar sized explosion."
How do you know? There is no video of the first impact's explosion. Yet another lie.
"If you are denying any strange events that day"
I'm not.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory again with the no plane shit! Where, once, do I say anything about no planes? You are a shill, supporting the lie, and using weak arguing skills to do so.
This video is titled "STEEL BUILDINGS DON'T COLLAPSE FROM FIRE" is it not?
Many reports of ground level explosions, melted steel and nanothermate found in the dust. you are a weasel. You have "no planes" up your ass.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
.... and as for the oil rig, the contained oil exploded destroying the supports, again fire did not take it down either. Unless you say the fire caused the explosion. weak....try a little reading, "logical self-defense" for starters. At least then you could debate a little more logically. Putting words in peoples mouth is a sure way to put your foot in your own.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN " do I say anything about no planes?"
Maybe you should tell me specifically what you think hit the tower so I can better understand why you ramble on like you do. You're the one making the claim that what is conventionally known about 9/11 is false, so the burden of proof is yours. Where is any evidence to support your silly claims?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory well no brain, lay out what you need explanation of here. Atta's magic passport? The complete lack of video from the pentagon...86 different cameras filmed the event, yet 3 frames released. The many, many irregularities and mountains of circumstantial evidence surrounding these events?
To answer your question: by all accounts it appears to me that missiles hit the buildings. Look up the definition of missile and you will see i am not contradicting myself. They were planes.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
flown by Saudi nationals. This event was used to sequester the middle east. Either the "powers that be" aided this event, which I think is true, or allowed it to happen. The put option issue ALONE should make you cringe!!! Let alone not a single Israeli national was killed in the towers, yet every other country had at least one. The core could not have given way like it did without further assistance.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN - "Let alone not a single Israeli national was killed in the towers, yet every other country had at least one."
That's a lie.
"The core could not have given way like it did without further assistance."
Another opinion without proof.
"The put option issue ALONE should make you cringe!!!"
Not really, because I know the story behind it.
"Big orange thing"
You can't see the exit side where most of the explosion occurred.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory lie eh? Jews died, as did muslims, but....
"ZERO Israeli nationals lost their lives in the WTC while citizens from over 80 different nations,"..had at least one
you do your own research i have proof for everything i have stated.
Please inform me on the 600% increase in put option in the days before, oh wise one.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN " i have proof for everything i have stated."
Then by all means show it.
"Please inform me on the 600% increase in put option in the days before, oh wise one."
I can't post links. Google 'snopes put options 9/11'
There were also high levels of options bought long by the same trader that shorted them on the 6th. How does that signify foreknowledge?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory can't post links as you stated
snopes as a reference? thats worse that using wiki. AA had put options against themselves ffs! 600% increase days before? snopes away that! was not all done by one trader.
I do not need to cite anything to you, if you really gave a shit you would see it yourself, proof of circumstantial evidence? it wouldn't be circumstantial. What do i state that you need referencing for? As i stated any facts i have stated there is proof of....so?
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
you dodge shit like a plastic mole! whack! whack! whack!
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN "snopes as a reference?"
The information is clearly sourced, but you probably didn't read it anyway. Hey, it's a far cry from pravda, which evidently you think is a credible news source.
"I do not need to cite anything to you"
Then why claim that you 'have proof for everything you're stating?'
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory 3:24 see the core?
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@nobraintheory OMFG you are an idiot. Have you even looked into this stuff? The Naudet brother's film and one other. check 0:24 here /watch?v=Ys41jnL2Elk
Big orange thing , I believe that is an explosion from what appears to be a plane hitting a building. NOT ONCE HAVE I STATED ANYTHING ABOUT NO PLANES! You are following the 25 rules to the letter you pathetic fucking troll,
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN -
" the wings of the zero did not leave cookie cutter holes through the vessel"
The wings weighed 1/100th of the 767 and they impacted solid steel, not columns and glass.
"what are you cheney's kid?"
What are you, Simon Shack's boyfriend?
"How many gallons of burning crude were on that rig?"
I thought it didn't burn hot enough to collapse a steel frame. Now it's just a matter of how much?
"Contained oil exploding dropped that rig"
And there wasn't an explosion at the WTC?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
actually the box girders on the outside of wtc would be MORE DENSE. There were two sides that would be perpendicular to the wing! i know what you meant but ships are solid steel now? where do the sea men live?
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN
" actually the box girders on the outside of wtc would be MORE DENSE."
More dense than what?
Ok, let's spell it out. You're telling me that a 350,000lb plane made of aluminum alloy, steel, titanium, etc., going 500mph doesn't have enough force to break 3/16 inch steel box columns?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory the ship! rereading the comment I left it is obvious, but I wrote it...I guess. a sheet of cardboard vs a box? get it?
Look up eye witness Rick Siegel and the helicopters in the plume of smoke!
And go bug someone else for a while, i see you have quite a few convos going on right now. Are you getting paid for this?Plane wings have signs all over them "NO STEP" why is that? There is one pic of a column cut by the tip of the wing, very odd indeed. and where is your rebut on the core?
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN - Talk about avoiding questions...
You must have missed this:
You're telling me that a 350,000lb plane made of aluminum alloy, steel, titanium, etc., going 500mph doesn't have enough force to break 3/16 inch steel box columns?
"And go bug someone else for a while"
If you don't want to continue, don't. Don't worry about me, I'm a grown ass man and I do what I want.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory 3/16"?????? where do you get this gem from? and yes you are an "ass man"! heavy on the ass i am betting!
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
Can't post links, I'll send you a message. You can apologize here after you get it if you want.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory apologize I started this comment chain with you, maybe. But for your fallacies? never!
dodging the pbs graphic? the core HAD to be removed for such a collapse and NOTHING you will quote, write or insult towards me will change my mind.
/watch?v=MY7BCXew0UI&feature=related
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN
"apologize I started this comment chain with you"
I accept your apology.
"NOTHING you will quote, write or insult towards me will change my mind."
Of course not, you're married to your theory regardless of evidence. That's the problem with twoofers.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory weak. read Jeff King's work
You with the IDF? NSA? how do you sleep? The more I look for links for you the more I am finding solid fishy shit about this false flag event.
You boys really have your work cut out for you! Must be a full time position you have here! THE CORE? come on you can't buy that pancake shit! NIST doesn't why do you?
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN "You with the IDF? NSA?"
I'm with the super secret delta squad world intelligence agency. I get paid to argue with dipshits on the youtube comment section.
"Must be a full time position you have here!"
It's is exhausting, because I have to sink to your level in order to talk to you.
"come on you can't buy that pancake shit! "
mmmm, pancakes.
"how do you sleep?"
On my side, usually.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory the burden of proof lays with the one making the claim, The 911 Commission is the claim...with no proof! Doesn't address the "core" issue.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NOmeansnoFAN "the burden of proof lays with the one making the claim, The 911 Commission is the claim...with no proof! Doesn't address the "core" issue."
You silly twoofers just don't get it. If you can't understand the simple concept of the burden of proof, and you choose to ignore the mountains of evidence that directly contradict your silly theory (which you won't even state), then nothing can help you. Have fun fixing people's toilets.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory watch?v=O4ZrkpJT4BM
"America Remembers" ....yeah, being lied to!
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN - "watch?v=O4ZrkpJT4BM"
Haha, so because audio and video are edited separately the plane is fake? Great logic...if you're a dipshit that has no experience editing media.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory again with the fake plane shit? why do you constantly do this???
I showed you that video for proof of fakery in the videos. Not in the planes. shill rule #7
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN
"again with the fake plane shit? why do you constantly do this???"
Because you're dancing on the fence and won't take a stand. You claim that the plane couldn't penetrate, the videos are faked, etc., but you won't take a stand as to what you think happened. If you don't have a theory, you can't be proven wrong.
"I showed you that video for proof of fakery in the videos. Not in the planes." What, then, was faked.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN toilets? not all pipes are for pooping in.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN - Sorry, I don't know all the different types of plumbers. I'll let you know if I get a clog in my sink.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory oooo so good. you should take this routine on the road. could you blther on with more misdirected ire and red herring arguments? typical retort from "your type" fyi I am a refrigeration mechanic. call me if you are building a hockey rink or cold storage, or like beer at 1 degree c
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN - "The zero in the USS Hinsdale was half out of the ship"
"the suicide plane crashed into her port side just above the water line and ripped into the engine room."
Wrong. And the ship's wall was solid steel, not half glass like the WTC.
Any comment on the steel oil rig collapsing from fire?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN let me ask you no im no steel technician nor can i spell hahaha but wouldnt a fire with jet engine fuel weaken the steel. and a plane flying in at that speed that is that heavy plus the burning fuel and heat would i believe weaken the structure dont you think then as the loads from the top push down on it it could cause it to collaspe, but hey everyone has their thoughts
Semper fi
TheTylershea 5 months ago
WATCH...RING OF POWER...PARTS 1-29
TheCosmo12345 1 year ago
Ok.......American Airlines flight 11 hit 1 world trade center at 8:46 am. The impact zone was between the 93rd and 99th floors.
United Airlines flight 175 hit 2 world trade center at 9:03 am. The impact zone was between the 77th and 85th floors.
sooo how the hell(even if steel is weakend) does the steel core column below the impact zones give up?There wasn't so hot down there.and for the whole building to get down the bottom floor columns had to be melted
Danidanivugs 2 years ago
@Danidanivugs
The core fell last, it was not melted at all. The outer shell of the bldg collapsed first, then the core fell
jeffmay1 1 year ago
WATCH...RING OF POWER...PARTS 1-29
TheCosmo12345 1 year ago
Steel melts at 1525° C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825° C, it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C, at 825°C the steel beams would have lost about 63.66% of it's strength combined with the silicon components of the electrical systems inside the building who explode and deliver a higher ammount of heat than jet fuel would be enough to make the towers drop.
amayagab 2 years ago
/watch?v=Qvai7oD4Ik0
imbrd 2 years ago
I am not here to argue. Someone said that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to make steel collapse, I say it does. I cannot argue with any of those who call themselves "truthers" because they are not skeptics, a skeptic demands to be challenged and to be convinced otherwise but no amount of reasoning or proof will convince any of them otherwise. They are fanatics and agenda driven, trying to have a discussion with any of the would be like kicking water up a hill.
amayagab 2 years ago
im not arguing- theres the facts
hect even if u weaken it- note ONLY a few places would b weakened & it would b weakened ASYMMETRICALLY! this means it would cause only a gradual tilt & slag over time from heat transfer. Note; heat transfer requires time to accomplish- hence why u can walk across hot coals & not get burned(c Mythbusters)
fire causes gradual assymetric damage&slagging. So even if u hav a 'partial collapse', the bottom like 80-90 stories ought to hav more than enough support
imbrd 2 years ago
to hold a couple softened stories. Hect its been able to do so for like 30 years! go watch this simple physics explanation; (note: when watching, please keep in mind the laws of conservation of energy&momentum as well as newton's 3 laws of motion. To deny or misunderstand any of these laws is not only faulty but shows great incompetence)
watch?v=28ds5sFvTG8
imbrd 2 years ago
but jet fuel is explosive, hence the fire ball at the begining, its not like the jet fuel laid in the building and burned the whole time, it burned up in a matter of 20 seconds, all of it
dereileak 1 year ago
I can see where you're going with this so let me clarify one thing for you, I don't care if it did or did not cause the towers to drop. I couldn't care less about what people think of 9/11, the "Truthers" stupid theories and the idiotic reports that the government spews out every week. All I am saying is that from a physics point of view, jet fuel and the massive amounts of silicon elements in the buildings COULD be hot enough to make the towers fall. Key word here is COULD.
amayagab 1 year ago
This was an inside job, no question about it. Motherfuckin politicians! HANG THEM ALL!!!!
Sideler74 2 years ago
was wtc 7 hit by a plane?
buckfush187 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is so stupid. Planes hit the buildings and they caught fire and then fell. Get over it already.
versanil 2 years ago
Not the third building, the WTC7.
alphamain 2 years ago
it most certainly did...research first ..then form a logical conclusion
meehaull 2 years ago
the towers were specifically designed to withstand that type of incident.
anyway jetfuel cannot create MOLTEN steel which was in the basements of all 3 towers more than 8 weeks later
mojoscary 2 years ago 10
THE ANSWER TO 1984 IS 1776
invinciblevinceable 2 years ago 3
Look, if the building was that hot, how did office workers stand and shout for help out of the hole where the plane hit?
The whole conspiracy is a joke. I could cover my tracks better than the government, and I'm not even well educated!
It's so sloppy.
CriSoldier 2 years ago 10
That woman standing in the plane impact hole, waving at the helicopter, must have been one of those 9/11 "twoofers" who hate America. If she had been a good citizen she would have supported our President in time of war by catching on fire and jumping to escape the intense flames as they weakened the steel.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
@CriSoldier - "Look, if the building was that hot, how did office workers stand and shout for help out of the hole where the plane hit?"
Obviously it was hot in some spots because people were JUMPING THE FUCK OUT.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@CriSoldier super thermite is a powder when ignited, reaches extreme temp. the temp. the thermite was in the girders, also, the heat it makes, is mostly isolated to itself
Gtaivownz 1 year ago
Have you ever heard of Blacksmithery?
Little history lession, for thousands of years, blacksmiths were able to manipulated iron and steel not by melting and casting it but by heating it to the point at which it softened so they could hammer it into various shapes.
Besides, its not like the plains doing a Kamikaze attack would have weakend the structure.
ImperatorZor 3 years ago
hahahaha the average idiot might buy that load of horse shit but your theory is missing something. care to inform the kids how a blacksmith was able to get the stronger metals hot enough to shape them. maybe you cant tell the class about the use and "need" of the diaphragm pump.
structural steel is an alloy mixed for strength and office fires with jet fuel didn't get hot enough to cause global failure of all support structure and symmetrical collapse at near free fall speed.
ALITL8 2 years ago
So, its the old Jet fuel cant melt steel, eh? Try reading about the Mont Blanc Tunnel (between Italy and France) Fire in March of 1999. A tanker of margarine caught fire in a tunnel and melted everything inside. Cars were turned into puddles of molten metal. The combustion temperature of vegetable oil is much less than kerosene (jet fuel). Trap enough fuel in a tight space and provide enough air and it can melt mountainside tunnels, twin towers or even stupid theories about 911.
b4sythe 3 years ago
b4sythe:"... margarine caught fire ... Cars were turned into puddles of molten metal.The combustion temperature of vegetable oil is much less than kerosene (jet fuel)."
Duhhh, then we should stop using kerosene heaters?
here is an interesting question if you are capable of doing elementary school math:
per square yard of office floor space of WTC 1 (excluding core column area) how much kerosene/jet fuel from jet?
what is single word to describe somebody disconnected from reality?
bIZAROsPRMN11 3 years ago
bIZAROsPRMN11, this has nothing to do with your heater. We are talking about whether the towers collapse was caused by conceivable scientific circumstances or whether it has to be an inside job; there is a pretty big difference. You should stop heating your home with yak dung, or at least open a window. The fresh air may help you practice elementary English and ask coherent questions (excluding your attempts to sound scientific or comprehensive) or provide rational answers.
b4sythe 3 years ago
what is single word to describe somebody disconnected from reality?
b4sythe thinks margarine melts cars. hmmmm.
b4sythe: "We are talking about whether the towers .... [demolition] was caused by conceivable scientific circumstances ..."
well, why didn't you say so. ever watch a controlled demolition? Guess what, those engineers use science.
btw, you DO realize WTC 1 was demolished?
r u a coincidence theorists? your last post 2 months ago, then 7 hours after my post. hmmmm
bIZAROsPRMN11 3 years ago
The front runner for a single word to describe somebody (that is) disconnected from reality is: bIZAROsPRMN11. Can you make a point without stating obvious things, like 'engineers use science'? There's no conspiracy in my reply, it's just YouTube dude! This site notifies its users when a post is replied to. Are you that desperate to believe you're in on something BIG. Ha! I guess I am guilty of stating some obvious things as well, trying (in vain) to keep you on track. I quit, enjoy your view.
b4sythe 3 years ago
how're ya comin with that elementary school math problem?
bIZAROsPRMN11 3 years ago
None of those other buildings have the weight of 74 floors and 40 tons of jet fuel that the WTC had on 911. You do not have to melt the steel for it to fall, all that must be done is to soften it enough to weaken, which is about 1,100 degrees which is 700 degrees below the melting point of 1,800 degrees. Any person who felt even 400 degree heat for more than 2 minutes close up is DEAD.
CREDITS4CARBON 3 years ago
So explain how people were seen waving from the holes created by the airplanes up to an hour after the crash. google edna citron she is the most prominently photographed of these poor people. put 2 and 2 together here please
911REICHSTAG 3 years ago
@911REICHSTAG " So explain how people were seen waving from the holes created by the airplanes up to an hour after the crash"
Explain how other people were jumping to their death. Was it because it was cold up there?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
The top of the building starts to tilt out, and then the bottom just gives out? Dude ask for an investigation. We are fighting WARS because of this.
Lungyao1 3 years ago
The twin towers were 110 stories tall. Steel actually loses much of it's structural strength at around 700-800 deg. Steel beams will also elongate as they heat up, causing collapses. Check out Francis L. Brannigan's Building Construction for the Fire Service. The voice in the video is wrong (or willfully ignoring volumes of contradicting data)- Steel buildings can and DO collapse as a result of fire.
pyroman6000 3 years ago
they said the collapse was caused by gravity?those towers peeled back like a bannana in ten seconds..never mind the fact that 110 floors each containing one acre of concrete vaporized in ten secs..what force could do that?it surely cannot be gravity
meehaull 2 years ago 5
@CREDITS4CARBON You're am idiot if you believe that. Do your research. Pick up a science book and read. I'm sure all that time you spent " researching" this info was time less spent than watching porn... No matter how soft steel would get, it would not cause an entire building to collapse within itself as the towers did. Its Physics... Try playing Jenga... and pick from close to the middle and you'll see what I mean.
Kal824 1 year ago
@Kal824 "No matter how soft steel would get, it would not cause an entire building to collapse within itself as the towers did"
Watch the collapse again. The towers absolutely did not collapse 'within themselves,' The debris field was huge.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
heh, its so funny how everyone i suddently some kinda Engineer or expert on the matter.
the thing is that there is too many question marks on what did happen.
as long as the questions arent answered these theories will pop out and they should
Darusdei 3 years ago
Check this video 9/11 conspiracy video alpha
jgmc987 3 years ago
Stupid videos like this is what causes consperiacy theroist to run rampant. Jet fuel burns hotter such as kerosene does. its why kerosene is used in heaters and not gasoline. the hotter the fire the more chance steel or any metal will weaken. i do not beleive the steel melted but rather was somehow "untempered" causing a structual failure.
pickle8486 3 years ago
if thats true you have to wonder why your kerosene heater wouldnt melt after one hour like the WTC did. Too bad molten steel was found under 3 buildings in NYC and jet fuel or kerosene cannot get near that temperature in an open-air burn.
911REICHSTAG 3 years ago
Explain how the rest of the structure just gave way. There wasn't fire throught the whole building so the rest of the building wasn't weak.
Lungyao1 3 years ago 2
Impact is one way. Just because a portion of the building wasn't directly involved in the crash, doesn't mean it isn't effected. Who knows what damage was done to remote elements of the structure by the crashes and resulting shift in load?? We'll probably never know as they collapsed shortly thereafter. Steel actually loses much of it's strength at around 700 deg F. It also elongates- causing all sorts of problems-pushing outward on walls, or buckling if it cannot push.
pyroman6000 3 years ago
@pickle8486 THAT IS ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT
MCHESTER29 1 year ago
Anyone that believes this is really what happened is brainwashed by the leftist media propaganda bullshit. The essentials of firefighting book that every fireman in training gets when they start will tell you "A 50 foot length of steel when heated to 1000 degrees F will expand up to 4 inches in length." For every 50 feet add 4 inches. And building construction will also tell you floors have a weight limit. I used work on planes. A 757 weighs approx. 80,000 pounds. Do the math!!!
fireman73386 3 years ago
so how did was molten steel found under the twin towers and building 7 which wasnt even hit by a plane?
911REICHSTAG 3 years ago
If it was molten steel. Meaning it was liquid it would have found its own leveling point like all liquids do. I have never been to the world trade center site, but if trde center 7 is downstream from the towers the liquid would have ran that way. I do not agree with everything President Bush has said or done, but the blame lies during the Clinton era. If we weren't wasting money and time on Whitewater or blow job gate we may have stopped this terrible tradgedy that was caused by extremist.
fireman73386 3 years ago
fireman you really sound dumb, you make it sound like it was a volcano going on, a stream of moten brought down trade 7?? come on how old are you, people that believe bush either just want to for the sake of it, or is just really dumb.
rafez32 3 years ago
The molten metal from the two towers came together united down below in the basements and made a plan. The molten metal thought, that this 9/11 event just really needed a conspiracy theory, so, a portion of it floated over to the WTC 7 basement, and then we are here today!!!
alienspacecentereast 3 years ago
@fireman73386 So you dont think your brainwashed by the Dich Chenney propaganda? yeah right. so how do you explain that every other steel frame structured building has never collapsed due office to fires? how did the "jet fuel" weaken the steel in the bottom floors? it didnt. how do you explain the molten pools of nano-thermite that burned for months after that attacks? do you think that was jet fuel burning for months on end. the only way those buildiongs came down was explosives.
MCHESTER29 1 year ago
@MCHESTER29 "how did the "jet fuel" weaken the steel in the bottom floors?"
The collapse started from the top, you ignorant dipshit. How did the oil platform off of Louisiana just collapse? Fire. Steel structure collapsed by fire.
"the only way those buildiongs came down was explosives."
They must have been magic invisible soundless explosives that leave no trace. Nano Thermite is not an explosive.
"the molten pools of nano-thermite"
Hahaha. There were no pools of nano thermite.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@nobraintheory is that why you can find pictures of them anywhere? wow.
MCHESTER29 1 year ago
@MCHESTER29 - What? Why don't you mention the oil rig, or the lack of explosives evidence, or the collapse starting from the top, or the fact that it would take tons of nano thermite to bring down the towers, or the fact that nano thermite has NEVER been used to demo a building?
nobraintheory 1 year ago
This video is now refusing to load, even after 30 minutes wait time.
I wonder why?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
fire didnt melt the towers metal, but it weakened it, and plus the fact that the towers were about 10 times bigger then any other buildings, the weight on the weakened metal is wut made it fall, look it up. scientifically provan
superman587 3 years ago
okay well they used the whole video talking about how steel buildings can withstand fire... but of course it wasnt ONLY fire. a plane went through it remember?? that could do something to the structural stability of the building
afireinside200 4 years ago
There was no damage to the structure..how could a hollow aluminum tube made of riveted sheets of light metal damage the steel core and exterior which is infinitely stronger?
911REICHSTAG 4 years ago
okay well the plane probably weighs around 50 tons, and its going over 300mph (probably) straight into a building. it doesnt make a bit of sense if you think that it wouldnt have done any damage.
afireinside200 4 years ago
an aluminum plane would crumple up like a coke can in my hand.
Ackdacka 4 years ago
your 9-11 conspiracy theories are crazy and with no proof. that is like saying ufo's crashed at roswell. with over 5000 photos taken of the towers after they came down no plasting or demolition signs were ever found.
paulwebb1 4 years ago
uh did you mean to reply to me, or the creator of the video
afireinside200 4 years ago
yes, the airplane slipped right in, i seen it on tv.
Ackdacka 4 years ago
not talkin to you...talkin to paulwebb1
afireinside200 4 years ago
well then reply to him
Ackdacka 4 years ago
i did. *leaves argument*
afireinside200 4 years ago
How do you cut steel ya bunch of idiots...by
burning it with a torch!
Moreover the trial lawyers forced the removal of the asbestos cladding, so it had to collapse.
And it did, you retarded estupidos!!!
Just look at the thousands of videos,
ya cretins!!!
hotspur666 4 years ago
"the trial lawyers forced the removal of the asbestos so it had to collapse" hahahahahahahahahahahaha are you really that stupid at 65 years old?
justopandthink 4 years ago
he is evil...666
Ackdacka 4 years ago
the force of the plane could have damaged the foundation. Various other things could have broken it.
I still think though there was some sort of cover up in this
veggieindian 4 years ago
Well, I think a decient portion of us are sceptical of the fires. In the event of the south tower, most of the fuel was eaten in the fireball. After the jet fuel was consumed, we would of had a normal high-ruse building...and I'd be willing to bet there was a crossbreeze. That would defenitely tone the temerature of the fire down. Agreed?
warriorjames 4 years ago
No- it does the exact opposite. the winds fan the flames like a bellows at a forge- making them burn HOTTER. The other fact all these conspiracy videos ignore, is that it only takes 500 degreesF to make steel lose it's strength. This is WELL within the temp range of a normal structure fire. The steel beams didn't melt, they failed when they got hot enough to lose their structural strength.
pyroman6000 4 years ago
Really, so cross ventiation would make the fires worse? Then what were they thinking when they installed the 'purge mode' in the tower's ventilation system? It blow freash cool air into the fire affected area and removed the smoke according to many sites.
warriorjames 4 years ago
To remove smoke and heat. Traditional ventilation techniques don't work for high rise buildings, because of the wind. The "purge mode" is positive pressure ventilation- it allows you to exhaust smoke and heat, to make conditions more tenable for life. This needs to be carefully controlled- to avoid fanning the fire.
pyroman6000 4 years ago
Oh...and just for the record, Sturctural Steel hits 60% strength at 550C (1022F). Also, even if the fireproofing was removed and the steel lost most of its room temperature strength, the cool concrete will keep things stable. If that isn't true, then these things should of come down in 1975.
warriorjames 4 years ago 2
it only takes a few seconds to melt steel, i do it every day at work with the help of acetylene(gas) and ... get this folks ...OXYGEN. only takes a few seconds. you are talking about tons and tons of fuel funning down the core which would act as a giant air shaft feeding the fuel just like a common blow torch. with the core melting the floor joists would cave in. and there was much more than concrete and steel an these floors. carpet, drop ceilings tons of plastic.
spudwrenchfalling 4 years ago