So Miller's proposed rule is that Luke's airo means "acquire" except in so-called Triple Tradition passages, correct? How does he explain Luke 22:36, which could not mean acquire since the purse is already owned by the person and does not appear to be a Triple Tradition passage?
From my experiance when other denoms say 'bible college', they refer to something other then 'seminary', ie only ba type stuff, but in the Anglican and Catholic Church, our schools (masters level)are called 'colleges' as synonomus with 'seminary'..iether way, the term does not negate the question. The truth is, much like the differing Geniologies, we simply don't know, but unlike many seem to think, that does not make it a death blow to the Bible. Please forgive my horrid English spelling.
I'm doing this by request. I'm not presenting a positive case, I'm refuting a negative case. Refutations of a negative case aren't supposed to prove anything.
Blocked, nerdbombs. You whine on my videos and refuse to provide any evidence, telling us to "look it up". In debate, you provide the evidence for your own position, my mentally ill friend.
hmmmm...that's an awful lot of tap dancing to try and create a loop hole to avoid the contradiction. I apply Occam's Razor.
But it doesn't really matter. If this contradiction is upheld, I don't see where it makes much of a difference in the grand scheme (other than proving that the Bible has errors...and there are far better choices than this one to do that). I find it more interesting that there are so many different apologist attempts when the obvious is so...well, obvious.
Uh, KH, if the two contradicting words mean different things, then if you knew Greek and were familiar with those two gospels, then it would be obvious. It only is complex because we speak English only. And these aren't the most fun videos for me either. I'm doing these videos by request.
yeah, I understand that you think that way. But you sound like a lawyer looking for a loop hole to me with your explanation. But like I said...this particular type of contradiction wasn't important to me, even as a Christian. Look at the numerical errors and you can tell that if nothing else, there are copyist errors somewhere along the way.
And I can appreciate that you are doing it on request...I'm interested in seeing what you do with some of his others.
YOUR HAIR AND FACE ARE THAT OF A MAN BABY.. OUT OF THIS WORLD, KINDA MINNIE ME MIXED WITH OZZY'S DAUGHTER........or something????
skunksnag 3 years ago
GET A LIFE AND STOP JACKIN IT
warhero138 3 years ago
why his hair?! Why?!! He couldnt see ANYTHING!!!!
CrimsonSkull999 3 years ago
Is Ehrman Irrefutable?
TheAmazingCristian 3 years ago
some of his claims (like 1 John 5:7-8 being a very late interpolation) are irrefutable.
migkillertwo 3 years ago
why is it that most religious people just take the words of others as their own opinion instead of thinking for themselves??
bichazuando 3 years ago
So Miller's proposed rule is that Luke's airo means "acquire" except in so-called Triple Tradition passages, correct? How does he explain Luke 22:36, which could not mean acquire since the purse is already owned by the person and does not appear to be a Triple Tradition passage?
RationalRat 3 years ago
Wayne's school = Baptist Bible College, Springfield, Mo.
Jerry Falwell got his Bachelor of Theology there in 1956.
justintempler 3 years ago
I don't respect Jerry Falwell. It sounds hyperfundamentalist.
KabaneTheChristian 3 years ago
I agree :=0
justintempler 3 years ago
From my experiance when other denoms say 'bible college', they refer to something other then 'seminary', ie only ba type stuff, but in the Anglican and Catholic Church, our schools (masters level)are called 'colleges' as synonomus with 'seminary'..iether way, the term does not negate the question. The truth is, much like the differing Geniologies, we simply don't know, but unlike many seem to think, that does not make it a death blow to the Bible. Please forgive my horrid English spelling.
allergictosoda 3 years ago
Your hair looks emo.
mambi 3 years ago
You've never seen emo hair then. My hair is more Beatles esque.
KabaneTheChristian 3 years ago
I'm doing this by request. I'm not presenting a positive case, I'm refuting a negative case. Refutations of a negative case aren't supposed to prove anything.
KabaneTheChristian 3 years ago
Blocked, nerdbombs. You whine on my videos and refuse to provide any evidence, telling us to "look it up". In debate, you provide the evidence for your own position, my mentally ill friend.
KabaneTheChristian 3 years ago
hmmmm...that's an awful lot of tap dancing to try and create a loop hole to avoid the contradiction. I apply Occam's Razor.
But it doesn't really matter. If this contradiction is upheld, I don't see where it makes much of a difference in the grand scheme (other than proving that the Bible has errors...and there are far better choices than this one to do that). I find it more interesting that there are so many different apologist attempts when the obvious is so...well, obvious.
KingHeathen 3 years ago
Uh, KH, if the two contradicting words mean different things, then if you knew Greek and were familiar with those two gospels, then it would be obvious. It only is complex because we speak English only. And these aren't the most fun videos for me either. I'm doing these videos by request.
KabaneTheChristian 3 years ago
yeah, I understand that you think that way. But you sound like a lawyer looking for a loop hole to me with your explanation. But like I said...this particular type of contradiction wasn't important to me, even as a Christian. Look at the numerical errors and you can tell that if nothing else, there are copyist errors somewhere along the way.
And I can appreciate that you are doing it on request...I'm interested in seeing what you do with some of his others.
KingHeathen 3 years ago
What's all this talk about staffs?
Justinfh2point0 3 years ago
I hate you nerdbombs, you claim the bible has contradictions, but wont name any because you know they will be answered.
So when all your arguments have been refuted, when you know what the evidence points to, you always have some thing to fall back on.
CooFrank 3 years ago
well done summary.
phlp314 3 years ago
you haven't named any.
CooFrank 3 years ago
cut your damn hair!!!
good vid
russjumps4fun 3 years ago
"Wheaton"...i'd be curious to know what you think of Westminster.
theChromeLamma 3 years ago
I didn't mean to make this a reply to you russ.
theChromeLamma 3 years ago
haha ya, I was like wtf?
haha
russjumps4fun 3 years ago
Dude it's quite simple, Wheaton or Westminster?...I'm not sure what you don't understand, it's entirely relevant to your original post
lol
theChromeLamma 3 years ago