Please watch my story"TIFFANY LEBOUEF SEEKS JUSTICE". I have documents to prove my innocence yet no one wants to even acknowledge it. My life has been destroyed.
Look up PRISON STOCKS....very lucrative....WHO ARE THE INVESTORS???
The mistake this young man made was when the LEO asked him to come down off the trailer, he replied "I don't think that's necessary."
Do what the police ask, be polite and compliant, and shut your pie hole, and there would be no story here. What you got was a good old fashioned shellacking for being an asshole.
@silvermediastudio You go ahead and lay down your rights at the feet of these jackboot thugs. Just give in, exactly like they want you to. Be a good little sheep.
@IowaFirearms Being polite and courteous to local law enforcement doesn't mean laying down your rights. Get off your high horse and contribute to the betterment of society, contrary to what you might believe, you are owed nothing. Countless people gave their blood for you to live the way you do and "enjoy your rights," thankless pig.
You tend to counter every statement you made. "Being polite and courteous..." Since when is standing up for your rights considered not polite.....or courteous. "Countless people gave thier blood..." Do you think those people would want us to just give up for what they fought for? The betterment of society means the police work for us. Not the other way around. They have limits and should be forced to work within those limits.
@IowaFirearms You want to talk classy? How about your comment to a girl showing she can dislocate her shoulders that you "just want to do you like im digging for treasure." Pig.
Police have limits set by law & SOP. It isn't for every person to give every cop a hard time on the street because they need to show they know their rights and how smart they are. Cops are people who pay taxes and wipe their ass after a shit just like you, treat them that way and they'll respect you a whole lot more.
@silvermediastudio Police have limits set by law and SOP? Good. The law does not allow them to violate ANYONES rights. If someone is caught committing a crime. So be it. However, if an officer has no RAS or PC then he has no right to detain someone unlawfully. Period. If this kids story holds true, what the officers did was illegal. Unlawful detainment, false imprisonment, etc.
@IowaFirearms The requirements for reasonable suspicion are typically "officer discretion." If the officer isn't sure of what happened, or what might happen, or an individual's intent, they are within the law to detain that person while asking questions and finding facts. This protects both the officer and the individual's safety.
If the individual feels they were detained without reasonable suspicion, or for an excessive duration, they can file a complaint through proper channels.
@silvermediastudio A violation of a persons civil rights is a crime. Some police officers dont have any issues with that. However, some of, if not most of, the officers in these videos are violating the citizen civil rights. Which, as said before, is not only a crime, but a violation of the oath they took to become police officers. But you do what you wish. If you feel that you are not strong enough to defend your rights, and wish to allow them to take them from you, have a good time.
@IowaFirearms I've never felt that way, never been in that position. I am friends with LEOs all of whom are great people who respect citizens and the Constitution, and I interact with law enforcement on a regular basis for a variety of reasons.
You are a mental infant who hasn't learned how to be part of society and properly interact with people.
@silvermediastudio I also am friends with several LEO's. I have two sons on the Sheriffs Department in my county. However, just because an officer "says so", does not make it law. I agree officers have to walk a very fine line, but they need to be ever aware of the possibility that their "hunch" could very well land them in hot water.
And as for IowaFirearms, although childish, he is mostly right. If a civilian were to violate your rights, you would go to no end to make sure they paid.
@FreedomToTheDeath So tell me what the difference is between that and a police officer doing the same thing? Just because you have a badge and a gun does not mean you have special powers. Officers are required to follow the law, not work outside of it.
@FreedomToTheDeath This is true, I agree with what you say. Part of that is police have review boards, and channels for citizens to file complaints against specific officers who have overstepped. Multiple complaints may mean the officer is docked pay, sent for training, put on probation, or terminated.
It would depend on the damages, if I was not harmed I would have no claim. I think police officers are civilian. Only active military and federal agents are something other than civilian, no?
@silvermediastudio That I am not sure of. I always thought of officers as just that. Officers. While in uniform, on duty. Ill ask the boys what they think.
As far as being violated by a citizen, I agree. However, the history of LE actually getting charged with a crime when/if it happens, is a lot harder to find than if you or I did the same things. And its because of the badge. Its just the way it is. Something we may have to deal with. Who knows?
I knew this was going to be BS. First the guy refuses to come down out of the truck, then he refuses to ID himself. Almost every "police abuse" video on YouTube involves the "victim" being a retard and bringing it on themselves somehow. The cops probably went through with the arrest just to hassle him for acting like a retard.
Also we don't know how long the cops were patient with him, and how long he defiantly argued.
@IowaFirearms I'm not a sheep. I know cops can be huge dipshits, and I fully believe in gun & carry rights. I'm just saying that if the cops are simply doing their jobs (investigating a situation), and aren't being dipshits, then why not cooperate, if it doesn't violate your rights/principles?
@FreedomToTheDeath If the cops were asking for his ID, etc, just because they didn't like the way he looked, or some other BS reason, then maybe he would have a valid reason to balk. But they weren't. They were checking out what looked like a suspicious situation. This mindset of "resist the police whenever possible!" is not what the movement is about. The movement is about resisting cops who are abusing their power. When a cop is NOT doing that, then we should reward them by cooperating.
@DominicMetal1979 If the story that this young man stated holds true, then they were abusing their power. The gentleman in the video stated that he was arrested for loitering, even after his boss came out and confirmed his employment. And the charge of obstructing government affairs, or whatever it was, is just a bs charge to push the issue to arrest. And the charges have been dropped. So please come up with another reason why these cops were in the right.
@DominicMetal1979 And to add, if they would have done a better job investigating, I.E. not assuming guilt before innocence by actually checking the office for people who could confirm his right to be there. They jumped to the conclusion, I.E he was guilty before he even had a chance, in their eyes, before doing their job.
What would convince you otherwise? The charges being dropped? I'm offended you think I'd bring you inaccurate information when we've come to have such a trusting relationship, SilentNation.
What is accurate about it? You basically taped one side of a story, where many of his claims he couldn't even look you straight in the eye. You take the time to look up the badge numbers and post names....and nothing more - leaving the one sided impression that this man's claims are right - and everyone elses are wrong. Don't play dumb dumb...you know exactly what I mean.
Can't imagine it's much different in the US. But watch?v=qqvijdxnHxI for a video exposing an IQ test officers in the UK take where if you score too high on the exam, you don't get to be an officer. High IQ is usually associated with critical thinking. Critical Thinkers question authority. Clearly NOT the type of foot soldiers they want going after public "nuisances". An officers who questions is a liability to the bottom line. (And the police departments are businesses, seeking profit)
I know there are many critics that will put down the stand that Kurt made or would call some of the other civil dis as being not worth the trouble. But situations like this where it's clear that it's an abuse of power like in Sam's case shows the populace how out of control the police are.
Arresting someone at their workplace and calling it loitering is as ridiculous as arresting Sam in the court lobby. This could easily turn into a lawsuit.. See you guys in NH.
suggestion: if these criminal fucks "offer" nolle pross in court, object.
if you're a sue-through-the-state kinda guy, this is a pretty good one. just looked up 642:1 ("Obstructing Government Administration"), and they're more full of shit than normal here. obviously, the "loitering" needs to be shoved up their asses.
a nolle pross is often treated as an "of course you wouldn't object" item, for we're supposed to be gleeful that the claws have been retracted, ready to pounce again. however, some judges will ask if defense objects to a nolle pross motion (probably just to be cute), and you can always object without being prompted. that's in court, of course. if it's nolle prossed outside court, paper objection would likely be laughed away.
dropped charges are a major part of the crime syndicate scam. fight.
I'm suspicious I will get to my trial on July 27th, and they will tell my my charges have been dropped. What do I do in that case, assuming the prosecutor tells me in the hallway outside the courtroom?
depending on how much energy you want to spend on this, immediately subpoena dash-cam and all other recordings (e.g., cop text messages, radio blah blah). FOIA stuff is more likely to get results after the case closed. if charges dropped, time to do the section 1983 route, which google has plenty on. you can represent yourself of course, though it's a huge pain in the ass however you slice it.
IMO, the answer lies outside the crime syndicate show trial scam. sucks however it's sliced.
This has been flagged as spam show
Please watch my story"TIFFANY LEBOUEF SEEKS JUSTICE". I have documents to prove my innocence yet no one wants to even acknowledge it. My life has been destroyed.
Look up PRISON STOCKS....very lucrative....WHO ARE THE INVESTORS???
I HOPE NOT THE JUDGES AND POLITICIANS.......
joanarc1111 1 week ago
Cops are useless robots.
cockyhemi 1 week ago
You do not have to show police your ID all you have to do is tell them your name if they ask thats a fed. law it use to be a free country?
jessembrown1 6 months ago
The mistake this young man made was when the LEO asked him to come down off the trailer, he replied "I don't think that's necessary."
Do what the police ask, be polite and compliant, and shut your pie hole, and there would be no story here. What you got was a good old fashioned shellacking for being an asshole.
silvermediastudio 6 months ago
@silvermediastudio You go ahead and lay down your rights at the feet of these jackboot thugs. Just give in, exactly like they want you to. Be a good little sheep.
IowaFirearms 4 months ago
@IowaFirearms Being polite and courteous to local law enforcement doesn't mean laying down your rights. Get off your high horse and contribute to the betterment of society, contrary to what you might believe, you are owed nothing. Countless people gave their blood for you to live the way you do and "enjoy your rights," thankless pig.
silvermediastudio 4 months ago
@silvermediastudio Thankless pig? Wow. Thats classy.
You tend to counter every statement you made. "Being polite and courteous..." Since when is standing up for your rights considered not polite.....or courteous. "Countless people gave thier blood..." Do you think those people would want us to just give up for what they fought for? The betterment of society means the police work for us. Not the other way around. They have limits and should be forced to work within those limits.
IowaFirearms 4 months ago
@IowaFirearms You want to talk classy? How about your comment to a girl showing she can dislocate her shoulders that you "just want to do you like im digging for treasure." Pig.
Police have limits set by law & SOP. It isn't for every person to give every cop a hard time on the street because they need to show they know their rights and how smart they are. Cops are people who pay taxes and wipe their ass after a shit just like you, treat them that way and they'll respect you a whole lot more.
silvermediastudio 4 months ago
@silvermediastudio Police have limits set by law and SOP? Good. The law does not allow them to violate ANYONES rights. If someone is caught committing a crime. So be it. However, if an officer has no RAS or PC then he has no right to detain someone unlawfully. Period. If this kids story holds true, what the officers did was illegal. Unlawful detainment, false imprisonment, etc.
IowaFirearms 4 months ago
@IowaFirearms The requirements for reasonable suspicion are typically "officer discretion." If the officer isn't sure of what happened, or what might happen, or an individual's intent, they are within the law to detain that person while asking questions and finding facts. This protects both the officer and the individual's safety.
If the individual feels they were detained without reasonable suspicion, or for an excessive duration, they can file a complaint through proper channels.
silvermediastudio 4 months ago
@silvermediastudio A violation of a persons civil rights is a crime. Some police officers dont have any issues with that. However, some of, if not most of, the officers in these videos are violating the citizen civil rights. Which, as said before, is not only a crime, but a violation of the oath they took to become police officers. But you do what you wish. If you feel that you are not strong enough to defend your rights, and wish to allow them to take them from you, have a good time.
IowaFirearms 4 months ago
@IowaFirearms I've never felt that way, never been in that position. I am friends with LEOs all of whom are great people who respect citizens and the Constitution, and I interact with law enforcement on a regular basis for a variety of reasons.
You are a mental infant who hasn't learned how to be part of society and properly interact with people.
silvermediastudio 4 months ago
@silvermediastudio I also am friends with several LEO's. I have two sons on the Sheriffs Department in my county. However, just because an officer "says so", does not make it law. I agree officers have to walk a very fine line, but they need to be ever aware of the possibility that their "hunch" could very well land them in hot water.
And as for IowaFirearms, although childish, he is mostly right. If a civilian were to violate your rights, you would go to no end to make sure they paid.
FreedomToTheDeath 4 months ago
@FreedomToTheDeath So tell me what the difference is between that and a police officer doing the same thing? Just because you have a badge and a gun does not mean you have special powers. Officers are required to follow the law, not work outside of it.
FreedomToTheDeath 4 months ago
@FreedomToTheDeath This is true, I agree with what you say. Part of that is police have review boards, and channels for citizens to file complaints against specific officers who have overstepped. Multiple complaints may mean the officer is docked pay, sent for training, put on probation, or terminated.
It would depend on the damages, if I was not harmed I would have no claim. I think police officers are civilian. Only active military and federal agents are something other than civilian, no?
silvermediastudio 4 months ago
@silvermediastudio That I am not sure of. I always thought of officers as just that. Officers. While in uniform, on duty. Ill ask the boys what they think.
As far as being violated by a citizen, I agree. However, the history of LE actually getting charged with a crime when/if it happens, is a lot harder to find than if you or I did the same things. And its because of the badge. Its just the way it is. Something we may have to deal with. Who knows?
FreedomToTheDeath 4 months ago
I knew this was going to be BS. First the guy refuses to come down out of the truck, then he refuses to ID himself. Almost every "police abuse" video on YouTube involves the "victim" being a retard and bringing it on themselves somehow. The cops probably went through with the arrest just to hassle him for acting like a retard.
Also we don't know how long the cops were patient with him, and how long he defiantly argued.
DominicMetal1979 7 months ago
@DominicMetal1979 If the officers would have actually performed thier jobs as required, this would not have happened.
But you know best, be a good little sheep. Ill watch as the wolves slaughter you.
IowaFirearms 4 months ago
@IowaFirearms I'm not a sheep. I know cops can be huge dipshits, and I fully believe in gun & carry rights. I'm just saying that if the cops are simply doing their jobs (investigating a situation), and aren't being dipshits, then why not cooperate, if it doesn't violate your rights/principles?
DominicMetal1979 4 months ago
@DominicMetal1979 Its obvious in this video that the person in the truck felt as if they were violating his rights/principles. So whats the problem.
FreedomToTheDeath 4 months ago
@FreedomToTheDeath If the cops were asking for his ID, etc, just because they didn't like the way he looked, or some other BS reason, then maybe he would have a valid reason to balk. But they weren't. They were checking out what looked like a suspicious situation. This mindset of "resist the police whenever possible!" is not what the movement is about. The movement is about resisting cops who are abusing their power. When a cop is NOT doing that, then we should reward them by cooperating.
DominicMetal1979 4 months ago
@DominicMetal1979 If the story that this young man stated holds true, then they were abusing their power. The gentleman in the video stated that he was arrested for loitering, even after his boss came out and confirmed his employment. And the charge of obstructing government affairs, or whatever it was, is just a bs charge to push the issue to arrest. And the charges have been dropped. So please come up with another reason why these cops were in the right.
FreedomToTheDeath 4 months ago
@DominicMetal1979 And to add, if they would have done a better job investigating, I.E. not assuming guilt before innocence by actually checking the office for people who could confirm his right to be there. They jumped to the conclusion, I.E he was guilty before he even had a chance, in their eyes, before doing their job.
FreedomToTheDeath 4 months ago
Both of Andrew's Charges have been dropped
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago
@GloriousCoconut Congrats, another over reaction on the Police's Part.
Lauraukify 4 months ago
I strongly suspect there is a whole lot more to this story than Keene cops just nit picking some random guy for the fun of it.
SILENTNATION1 2 years ago
What would convince you otherwise? The charges being dropped? I'm offended you think I'd bring you inaccurate information when we've come to have such a trusting relationship, SilentNation.
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago
What is accurate about it? You basically taped one side of a story, where many of his claims he couldn't even look you straight in the eye. You take the time to look up the badge numbers and post names....and nothing more - leaving the one sided impression that this man's claims are right - and everyone elses are wrong. Don't play dumb dumb...you know exactly what I mean.
SILENTNATION1 2 years ago
Could the req's on the application for NewHampshire law enforments now include some basic IQ checks? thx in advance.
sidsixpoint7 2 years ago
Can't imagine it's much different in the US. But watch?v=qqvijdxnHxI for a video exposing an IQ test officers in the UK take where if you score too high on the exam, you don't get to be an officer. High IQ is usually associated with critical thinking. Critical Thinkers question authority. Clearly NOT the type of foot soldiers they want going after public "nuisances". An officers who questions is a liability to the bottom line. (And the police departments are businesses, seeking profit)
JohnBabiuk 2 years ago
This is an outrage!
mackler 2 years ago
I know there are many critics that will put down the stand that Kurt made or would call some of the other civil dis as being not worth the trouble. But situations like this where it's clear that it's an abuse of power like in Sam's case shows the populace how out of control the police are.
Arresting someone at their workplace and calling it loitering is as ridiculous as arresting Sam in the court lobby. This could easily turn into a lawsuit.. See you guys in NH.
wait887 2 years ago
suggestion: if these criminal fucks "offer" nolle pross in court, object.
if you're a sue-through-the-state kinda guy, this is a pretty good one. just looked up 642:1 ("Obstructing Government Administration"), and they're more full of shit than normal here. obviously, the "loitering" needs to be shoved up their asses.
2ndAsstJizzMopper 2 years ago
How do you object to them dropping the charges against you? Does it not mean they simply will not prosecute? How can you force them to go through?
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago
a nolle pross is often treated as an "of course you wouldn't object" item, for we're supposed to be gleeful that the claws have been retracted, ready to pounce again. however, some judges will ask if defense objects to a nolle pross motion (probably just to be cute), and you can always object without being prompted. that's in court, of course. if it's nolle prossed outside court, paper objection would likely be laughed away.
dropped charges are a major part of the crime syndicate scam. fight.
2ndAsstJizzMopper 2 years ago
I'm suspicious I will get to my trial on July 27th, and they will tell my my charges have been dropped. What do I do in that case, assuming the prosecutor tells me in the hallway outside the courtroom?
Nothing?
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago
depending on how much energy you want to spend on this, immediately subpoena dash-cam and all other recordings (e.g., cop text messages, radio blah blah). FOIA stuff is more likely to get results after the case closed. if charges dropped, time to do the section 1983 route, which google has plenty on. you can represent yourself of course, though it's a huge pain in the ass however you slice it.
IMO, the answer lies outside the crime syndicate show trial scam. sucks however it's sliced.
2ndAsstJizzMopper 2 years ago
Excellent work on short notice, Coconut!
TackleTheWorld 2 years ago
I appreciate the recognition. I do what I feel is valuable to be done. Lead by example.
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago
What a waste of time and money. Does the KPD have nothing better to do? If not, I think it's time to trim down the force.
FreeKeene 2 years ago 4
It is not a waste of time and money, it is perfectly in line with the goals of the state, to funnel wealth to the establishment and its friends.
lordmetroid 2 years ago