this is really cool im watchin this along with my college physics class tohelp ensure i defff getan a. i learned most of thisstuff in high school though. but im an engineerong major and im getting a free MIT education :)
@Danelawz The cross product gives us a "Vector" which is perpendicular to the given vectors, in our case "A"&"B". One thing to notice is that the cross product works ONLY in 3D Vectors. U can NOT use the cross product in 2D Vectors. The Dot product is a scalar quantity nd u use it to find out the angle between two vectors. If two vectors are perpendicular to each other then "θ= 90". "cos θ" is then "0". according to our formula it says: A.B= lAl lBl cos θ = 0 WHEN A nd B are perpendicular.
Although I'm a filmmaking student and it's entirely maths that I'll probably never ever have to use in my life, I can't help but watch his lectures, he's just too damn good a teacher and makes every little figure fascinating.
btw, don't watch the vid from 31:05 if you haven't watched from the start or you might go kabooze *g*
What an absolutely brilliant educator! Such CLEAR explanations and great empathy for the students. Perhaps I could have been a great mathematician of physicist had been my professor.
well, the dot product i think is getting through to my head, but the x product I don't fully understand. one thing that worries me is all those equaions, i just hope i'll be able to learn them before exam time
this r real profesors...u can see his crazy phisycs mind.His life is phisycs,and he wanna learn as more people he can...pretty amaizing.this guy is a hero for me.
This is not even the best MIT class. This is just one of the many introductory classes in physics. This is the least demanding class intended for engineering majors and non-science majors.
There is another class intended for physics majors. It uses the book "Introduction to Mechanics" by Kleppner. That is even more bad ass than this one.
The same with Calculus classes. What they post on the net for free are the least demanding ones.
Look up the MIT OCW site -- all the variations of 8.01. Check the syllabus tab for every course, you will find the book. But there aren't free lectures for that class, obviously. And 8.02 is also very easy.
What kind of qualifications would you need to get into a uni like MIT? I live in scotland and thus may need a grade translation to Highers/Adv. Highers.
so you were once a moron? When did you grow out of your moronic ways? even more so, when in your undergraduate career did you realize that you were in fact a moron?
Yes, I was. I grew out of it in graduate school. I didn't realize I was a moron when I was undergraduate because morons normally don't realize they are morons. It was only after teaching undergraduates for 3 years that I realized they are, in fact, morons.
honestly. I could not think of a better physics lector. I go to MIT now and was going to take 8.02 Physics electricity and magnetism, but he doesn't lecture anymore. Now I'm studying for the exam to pass out of 8.02.
W ogólności długość wektora prędkości się zmienia. Można go zapiac jako sume wektorów bazowych w kartezjańskim ukladzie płaskim. Wektor predkości skierowany wzdłuz osi X nie zmienia sie z uwagi na nieobecnosć sil w tym kieunku. To trywialny wniosek pierwszej zasady dynamiki. Expicite zmienia sie tylko skadow pionowa predkosci. w ukladzie biegunowym kąt i dlugosc wetora prędkosci sie zmienia.
Minute: 41:28 He says the velocity in X axis is constant but if alpha changes should it not change?
He says the velocity doesnt vary with time in horizontal X axis. But velocity is defined as vcos(alpha) and with time the angle alpha and hence velocity in horizontal shud change rite? why doesnt it?
the alpha in v cos(alpha) he wrote on blackboard was measured at the start time hence not time dependent. the reason why velocity along x doesn't change is that acceleration along x is zero since the only force is gravity which is vertical. it is true that at subsequent time alpha will change but then v will also change and these change together will be such that the new vcos(alpha) will stay constant.
When I said that at subsequent times alpha changes I obviously meant the direction of the velocity vector with the horizontal axis so I guess I didn't make any incorrect statements.
Alpha is the incident angle so it is always constant i.e The angle at which projectile was fired/thrown in space. thus Horizontal component is conatant.
This man is a genius, not in the context of the information, but in the context of the manner of his presenting the information. I have yet to see a professor express it with as much diligence as he.
Physics work!!!!
poetdragon 2 days ago
this is really cool im watchin this along with my college physics class tohelp ensure i defff getan a. i learned most of thisstuff in high school though. but im an engineerong major and im getting a free MIT education :)
iv54 6 days ago
171k visitors
ollobrains1 1 week ago
really great..and the last 4 minutes were the best..
stavrospod 1 week ago
Cool, with these videos i can finally get a REAL education. It is almost like stealing.
howincrediblyshit 3 weeks ago
169,000 viewer!
redrum41987 3 weeks ago in playlist MIT 8.01 Physics I: Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999
the cross product |a||b|sin(theta) must be larger than zero.
saraniu009 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
15:00 >> my face all the time when watching walter lewin teach
tpuemats 1 month ago
Comment removed
tpuemats 1 month ago
can someone answer me this question
is he talking about the right hand rule when referring to the corkscrew?
just like the ones we learned in electricity?
leeyihlun19940520 1 month ago
@leeyihlun19940520 yes
taimoor722 1 week ago
@leeyihlun19940520 - Yes, where your four fingers represent the rotation of vector "A", your thumb is the cross-product vector.
TheLoneDevil 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if anyone needs help with specific questions, send them to me for step-by-step solutions!
AnswerLeak 1 month ago
naja ich hab was unanständiges entdeckt
TrinhLoretacs15 1 month ago
i wish my professor was like that
3llay 2 months ago 4
I have to content myself with the fact that I will never be as cool as this guy. :-)
mdiem 2 months ago
As soon as he starts talking in three dimensions, I'm lost.
goldenate 2 months ago in playlist Walter Lewin Lectures
11 people can go fuck themselves
probowler94 2 months ago
Comment removed
alex10163 2 months ago
@Danelawz The cross product gives us a "Vector" which is perpendicular to the given vectors, in our case "A"&"B". One thing to notice is that the cross product works ONLY in 3D Vectors. U can NOT use the cross product in 2D Vectors. The Dot product is a scalar quantity nd u use it to find out the angle between two vectors. If two vectors are perpendicular to each other then "θ= 90". "cos θ" is then "0". according to our formula it says: A.B= lAl lBl cos θ = 0 WHEN A nd B are perpendicular.
alex10163 2 months ago
"the bad news today is there will be quite a bit of math" wait this is MIT hes at right?!
wittenberg5 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Vrooooomb, Vrooooooooooomb, Vrooooooooooomb
his dots sound like Nascars lol
Palmakoy 3 months ago
awesome!
NE5pats 3 months ago 2
"I have an apple-
not an apple...
This is a tomato-
not a tomato
It's a potato!"
purplebluebirds 3 months ago 20
@purplebluebirds His brain is dealing with physics, not fruit and vegetables. God I laughed though...
Falewick 2 months ago
wouldnt the parabolic curve explain this better
proslice56 4 months ago
lost me at 2:00
trentWHY 4 months ago
There is an error around 22:20. It should be Cx - Cy + Cz.
jrowley47 4 months ago
@jrowley47 there is no error, he just introduced the minus sign into the bracket
holbansimona 4 months ago
@jrowley47 No, because the value of C_y already takes care of the signs.
Yakeyglee 4 months ago
Now that's called passion for physics. Physics works!!
liju87philip 5 months ago 5
Epic
jadx99 5 months ago
his cross product is too confusing, just do it as a determinant
barnettb901 6 months ago in playlist classical mechanics
His dotted lines are amazing.
stewitr 6 months ago 44
2600 is the lecture room number...
baktru 6 months ago in playlist MIT 8.01 Physics I: Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999
what is 26100??????
he keeps saying this no. repeatedly..
diablo9873 7 months ago
@diablo9873 26100 is the lecture hall they are in
wowzabowza123 4 months ago 3
This kind of lecture given in MIT? I am surprised ! this is high school stuffs.....
anuarag67 8 months ago
@anuarag67
I don't know what university you went to, but where I go, we also learned high school stuff in the beginning.
AleifrLeifrson 8 months ago 5
@AleifrLeifrson because of tough competion we have to do theese things in high school thoroughly..
MrPushp12 7 months ago
Although I'm a filmmaking student and it's entirely maths that I'll probably never ever have to use in my life, I can't help but watch his lectures, he's just too damn good a teacher and makes every little figure fascinating.
btw, don't watch the vid from 31:05 if you haven't watched from the start or you might go kabooze *g*
MrMcj87 8 months ago
i think i got overly excited when the golf ball landed right in the funnel lmao !
fleminem1 9 months ago
What an absolutely brilliant educator! Such CLEAR explanations and great empathy for the students. Perhaps I could have been a great mathematician of physicist had been my professor.
robleclerc 9 months ago
U R GREAT
Yami7761 9 months ago 2
His wackiness is so refreshing.
ac7491 9 months ago
i would call the vector," x component, y component, z component if it were 3d" better than getting confused , my opinion
junior1984able 10 months ago
i f the object 's initial velocity is 0 , then the equation looks something like vf^2= 2ad
for the disance formula: d=(vf/2)change in time
junior1984able 10 months ago
the final velocity of somethin in constant motion = the inital velocity of it + a (change in time)
or vf^2 +vi^2 + 2ad
junior1984able 10 months ago
@KlassicStrat72 I suppose you mean a 90º angle. It's actually a bit over 90º, but not much. It's easy when you get the hang of it.
JmSantos78 10 months ago
well, the dot product i think is getting through to my head, but the x product I don't fully understand. one thing that worries me is all those equaions, i just hope i'll be able to learn them before exam time
Zee96969696 11 months ago
He turned "There is no x acceleration." into a 10-minute experiment.
mariomaruf 11 months ago
@mariomaruf 3-minute. Not 10-minute.
wreynolds1995 10 months ago
His cross product he forgot to subtract the second (Cz) term.
loopdeloop17 11 months ago
@loopdeloop17 Cy not Cz
loopdeloop17 11 months ago
Comment removed
asss2grass 1 year ago
shit, I think I once understood this stuff, but he blew my mind!
ton321 1 year ago
One observation (24:32 min): AxB is a vector, |A||B|sin(theta) is a scalar... the equality only holds if you take |AxB| instead of AxB
juakawillowsbrain 1 year ago
3 down.. way more to go.
CliveSinclairZX 1 year ago 11
This video is fantastic I wish I would have found this earlier
Gsapc0ntrab 1 year ago
I loved physics for scientists and engineers 1, pretty hard for a freshman class but worth it.
aaaa1 1 year ago
Anybody knows how he does the dotted lines in one swing of his arm?
Sinagitarius 1 year ago
does anybody know where can i download the subtitles of this lectures?
RICARDOTORRES1985 1 year ago
@RICARDOTORRES1985 Dude there's a transcript beside the description of the video.
Sinagitarius 1 year ago
What does 8.01 mean?
elchafa 1 year ago
@elchafa In MIT the numbers is what is used to denote a subject. 8.01 in this case is referring to Physics.
KingRobbStark 1 year ago
those dotted lines are so cool
limerick2090 1 year ago
He looks like a mad scientist.
killkill0 1 year ago 8
nice egg.
MrTechnoAlex 1 year ago
this r real profesors...u can see his crazy phisycs mind.His life is phisycs,and he wanna learn as more people he can...pretty amaizing.this guy is a hero for me.
ssrider7 1 year ago
It's sound very Excellent Lectures, I am Learning now. and I love him so much. God Bless you dear Profesor, Arip Nurahman from Indonesia
aripnurwana 1 year ago
so cool how he marks with dots..
GuidoPerdomo 1 year ago
wonderful resource on You tube,his lecture really helped me a lot.ha-ha
days0901 1 year ago
This professor 'wants' to teach. Others are just doing their jobs.
sajidullah 1 year ago 3
why does he have an egg on his pocket?
jackshay01 1 year ago
I love the type of chalk they use, lol
23SuS23 1 year ago 3
he is very funny and makes physics is fun
ditaelita 1 year ago
he is very funny and makes physics is fun
ditaelita 1 year ago
This is not even the best MIT class. This is just one of the many introductory classes in physics. This is the least demanding class intended for engineering majors and non-science majors.
There is another class intended for physics majors. It uses the book "Introduction to Mechanics" by Kleppner. That is even more bad ass than this one.
The same with Calculus classes. What they post on the net for free are the least demanding ones.
LogicalFlawDetector 1 year ago
@LogicalFlawDetector
My frnd, this is an EASY class, everywhere. if u see 8.02, IT IS KICK ASS.
where do they teach with that book? at mit?
gulloogtg 1 year ago
@gulloogtg
Look up the MIT OCW site -- all the variations of 8.01. Check the syllabus tab for every course, you will find the book. But there aren't free lectures for that class, obviously. And 8.02 is also very easy.
LogicalFlawDetector 1 year ago
This guy is great.
What kind of qualifications would you need to get into a uni like MIT? I live in scotland and thus may need a grade translation to Highers/Adv. Highers.
TenForExecution 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
37:15 Help, what is mean "26.100"?
virusnyak 1 year ago
building?
virusnyak 1 year ago
I just figured out vector addition:)
milpitas1985 1 year ago
Great instructor, he teach very good.
musyun1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
teaching undergraduates = teaching morons
johnAshpool 1 year ago
so you were once a moron? When did you grow out of your moronic ways? even more so, when in your undergraduate career did you realize that you were in fact a moron?
thejugglenaut91 1 year ago 4
Yes, I was. I grew out of it in graduate school. I didn't realize I was a moron when I was undergraduate because morons normally don't realize they are morons. It was only after teaching undergraduates for 3 years that I realized they are, in fact, morons.
johnAshpool 1 year ago
Comment removed
johnAshpool 1 year ago
he is clint eastwood, right? .. :P:P
crudvelch 2 years ago
49:15
physics works! see you Wednesday.
asafefraim 2 years ago 8
He's Dutch isn't he?
JustWonderingHowToDo 2 years ago
@JustWonderingHowToDo: Ja, he is indeed dutch.
Whopzer 2 years ago
20:00
holyender515 2 years ago
I wish I could work a piece of chalk like him!
MrKBentley 2 years ago 8
@MrKBentley Just use the chalk in an angle a bit over 90º, but not much. It's easy when you get the hang of it.
JmSantos78 10 months ago
great refresher!
krillansavillan 2 years ago
This prof. is funny and reminds my college time...Loved physics...
femtophysiker 2 years ago 11
honestly. I could not think of a better physics lector. I go to MIT now and was going to take 8.02 Physics electricity and magnetism, but he doesn't lecture anymore. Now I'm studying for the exam to pass out of 8.02.
kfish117 2 years ago 7
physics works.
sixteenfourty 2 years ago 63
@sixteenfourty see you wednesday.
RylyC 2 years ago
im learning
philotaaveti 2 years ago
"my g is always positive"... what a cool homey he is ;-)
naguelles 2 years ago 7
"...if you do that i will KILL you!!! you will always always work in what we call the right hand system..."
i love his passion in his lectures lol ;D
Mathikins 2 years ago 86
@Mathikins : Careful, we know he has a gun from 8.01 Lec 2!
ElizabethAGreene 1 year ago
i learnt this in my as physics class...
ClaireNJay 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Niech ktoś mądry przetłumaczy:
W ogólności długość wektora prędkości się zmienia. Można go zapiac jako sume wektorów bazowych w kartezjańskim ukladzie płaskim. Wektor predkości skierowany wzdłuz osi X nie zmienia sie z uwagi na nieobecnosć sil w tym kieunku. To trywialny wniosek pierwszej zasady dynamiki. Expicite zmienia sie tylko skadow pionowa predkosci. w ukladzie biegunowym kąt i dlugosc wetora prędkosci sie zmienia.
elementary69 2 years ago
Minute: 41:28 He says the velocity in X axis is constant but if alpha changes should it not change?
He says the velocity doesnt vary with time in horizontal X axis. But velocity is defined as vcos(alpha) and with time the angle alpha and hence velocity in horizontal shud change rite? why doesnt it?
rtoindru 2 years ago
the alpha in v cos(alpha) he wrote on blackboard was measured at the start time hence not time dependent. the reason why velocity along x doesn't change is that acceleration along x is zero since the only force is gravity which is vertical. it is true that at subsequent time alpha will change but then v will also change and these change together will be such that the new vcos(alpha) will stay constant.
pathologicalpoet 2 years ago
Yeah I kind of figured that out in time... alfa is the angle of projection and it doesnt change ... so your partially right not fully.
Originally I thought alfa was the tangential angle of the parabolic path! Hence the confusion
rtoindru 2 years ago
When I said that at subsequent times alpha changes I obviously meant the direction of the velocity vector with the horizontal axis so I guess I didn't make any incorrect statements.
pathologicalpoet 2 years ago
Alpha is the incident angle so it is always constant i.e The angle at which projectile was fired/thrown in space. thus Horizontal component is conatant.
nasirk70ahmad 2 years ago
Comment removed
elementary69 2 years ago
FIRST NEWTON LAW
elementary69 2 years ago
What does the 26.100 he keep saying means??
wyz135 2 years ago
i think thats the 'name' of the room. he uses it when talking about an observer who is in the room, but not standing on the table with him.
Very nice video !
thermalCat 2 years ago
"It's like going to the dentist"....LOL
GiveItOrLoseIt 2 years ago
Thanks for the lesson, the fried egg on his shirt makes me lol too :D
BaloneyX 2 years ago
why do american people say math, british peope say maths? is that a competition? like
iiimtf44 2 years ago
at 26.10
I have an apple, Not an apple this is a TOMATO, not a tomato its a POTATO!!
AWSmith1955 2 years ago 7
This man is a genius, not in the context of the information, but in the context of the manner of his presenting the information. I have yet to see a professor express it with as much diligence as he.
lordennis01 3 years ago
fastforward the lecture and watch the last 3 minutes. That's the fun'er' part =]
Cplex702 3 years ago
Thanks for posting this!
PianoWallaby 3 years ago
he is the best
kavoos1000 3 years ago
What's the "twenty six one hundred" he kept mentioning means?
Probably the classroom they are sitting in?
davidablair 3 years ago
Ya that is probably the room. Every building is numbered at MIT, and 100 means its room 00 on the first floor.
newyorkairlines 3 years ago
What's the "twenty six one hundred" he kept mentioning means?
wyz135 3 years ago
really really good lecturer
indagun 3 years ago 7
I love your videos! It gives me something interesting to watch when I am bored! Thank you very much for posting them online!
forsakendreamer 3 years ago 9
Thank you so much for posting this stuff.
dondean517 3 years ago 4
This stuff rules!
swingsetbucket 3 years ago 4
awesome lecture...!!!
very easy to understand!!!
nice & clear!!!! luv it!!
smileyellowkat 3 years ago 10
best prof i have ever had, hands down.
sbee00 3 years ago 8
THIS CLASS WAS VERY GOOD !!!
k9iou 3 years ago 11
hes crazy good at drawing graphs. I couldn't even copy his graphs into my notes because they're so exact!
Anonz3 3 years ago
Kudos !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can I save this to my hard disk and burn this into video lectures to a separate device so that I can relish "virtual Physics" environment?
merabharatmahaniam 3 years ago
yeah, they give a url in the video description where you can download the videos
Anonz3 3 years ago
I really enjoy Dr. Lewin's lectures! Please continue to post more! Thank you.
BrianC589 4 years ago 64